Neil Osterweil

Lugano, Switzerland – A combination of obinutuzumab (Gazyva) and the experimental immunomodulatory agent CC-122 showed “clinically meaningful” activity against relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in a phase 1b study.

Among 38 patients with heavily pretreated, relapsed/refractory DLBCL, follicular lymphoma (FL), or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), the overall response rate was 66%, including 12 patients (32%) with a complete response (CR), reported Jean-Marie Michot, MD, from the Goustave-Roussy Cancer Center in Villejuif, France.

hematologynews@frontlinemedcom.com

Lugano, Switzerland – A combination of obinutuzumab (Gazyva) and the experimental immunomodulatory agent CC-122 showed “clinically meaningful” activity against relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in a phase 1b study.

Among 38 patients with heavily pretreated, relapsed/refractory DLBCL, follicular lymphoma (FL), or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), the overall response rate was 66%, including 12 patients (32%) with a complete response (CR), reported Jean-Marie Michot, MD, from the Goustave-Roussy Cancer Center in Villejuif, France.

hematologynews@frontlinemedcom.com

Lugano, Switzerland – A combination of obinutuzumab (Gazyva) and the experimental immunomodulatory agent CC-122 showed “clinically meaningful” activity against relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in a phase 1b study.

Among 38 patients with heavily pretreated, relapsed/refractory DLBCL, follicular lymphoma (FL), or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), the overall response rate was 66%, including 12 patients (32%) with a complete response (CR), reported Jean-Marie Michot, MD, from the Goustave-Roussy Cancer Center in Villejuif, France.

hematologynews@frontlinemedcom.com

MADRID – A combination of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax with a hypomethylating agent may produce high overall response rates among older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), early data showed.

Among 100 patients age 65 years and older with previously untreated AML, the combination of venetoclax with either decitabine or azacitidine was associated with a 69% overall responses rate, reported Keith W. Pratz, MD, of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

• Decitabine plus venetoclax 400 mg: 76% (44% CR, 32% CRi).
• Decitabine plus venetoclax 800 mg: 68% (36% CR, 32% CRi).
• Azacitadine plus venetoclax 400 mg: 72% (28% CR, 44% CRi).
• Azacitadine plus venetoclax 800 mg: 56%: (28% CR, 28% CRi, PR 1% [numbers rounded up]).

The combined CR/CRi rate was 60% among patients with poor-risk cytogenetics and 78% among patients with intermediate-risk disease. In addition, the combination was effective among patients with both primary de novo AML (68%) and secondary AML (related to myelodysplasia or myeloproliferative neoplasms or previous therapy; 73%).

Overall survival after a median of 9 months since the first dose of the study drug was estimated to be 79% at 6 months and 70% at 12 months, with the median not reached.

Treatment-related adverse events were similar between the decitabine- and azacitidine-containing arms at the given dose of venetoclax. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events included thrombocytopenia in 56% of patients on the 400-mg dose of venetoclax and in 32% of those on the 800-mg dose. Grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 48% and 30%, respectively, and neutropenia in 40% and 32%.

A phase 3 study of venetoclax at the 400-mg dose with azacitidine has been initiated. NCT02993523 is currently enrolling patients, Dr. Pratz said.

The study was supported by Abbvie and Genentech. Dr. Pratz disclosed research funding from Abbvie and other companies.

MADRID – A combination of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax with a hypomethylating agent may produce high overall response rates among older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), early data showed.

Among 100 patients age 65 years and older with previously untreated AML, the combination of venetoclax with either decitabine or azacitidine was associated with a 69% overall responses rate, reported Keith W. Pratz, MD, of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

• Decitabine plus venetoclax 400 mg: 76% (44% CR, 32% CRi).
• Decitabine plus venetoclax 800 mg: 68% (36% CR, 32% CRi).
• Azacitadine plus venetoclax 400 mg: 72% (28% CR, 44% CRi).
• Azacitadine plus venetoclax 800 mg: 56%: (28% CR, 28% CRi, PR 1% [numbers rounded up]).

The combined CR/CRi rate was 60% among patients with poor-risk cytogenetics and 78% among patients with intermediate-risk disease. In addition, the combination was effective among patients with both primary de novo AML (68%) and secondary AML (related to myelodysplasia or myeloproliferative neoplasms or previous therapy; 73%).

Overall survival after a median of 9 months since the first dose of the study drug was estimated to be 79% at 6 months and 70% at 12 months, with the median not reached.

Treatment-related adverse events were similar between the decitabine- and azacitidine-containing arms at the given dose of venetoclax. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events included thrombocytopenia in 56% of patients on the 400-mg dose of venetoclax and in 32% of those on the 800-mg dose. Grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 48% and 30%, respectively, and neutropenia in 40% and 32%.

A phase 3 study of venetoclax at the 400-mg dose with azacitidine has been initiated. NCT02993523 is currently enrolling patients, Dr. Pratz said.

The study was supported by Abbvie and Genentech. Dr. Pratz disclosed research funding from Abbvie and other companies.

MADRID – A combination of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax with a hypomethylating agent may produce high overall response rates among older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), early data showed.

Among 100 patients age 65 years and older with previously untreated AML, the combination of venetoclax with either decitabine or azacitidine was associated with a 69% overall responses rate, reported Keith W. Pratz, MD, of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

• Decitabine plus venetoclax 400 mg: 76% (44% CR, 32% CRi).
• Decitabine plus venetoclax 800 mg: 68% (36% CR, 32% CRi).
• Azacitadine plus venetoclax 400 mg: 72% (28% CR, 44% CRi).
• Azacitadine plus venetoclax 800 mg: 56%: (28% CR, 28% CRi, PR 1% [numbers rounded up]).

The combined CR/CRi rate was 60% among patients with poor-risk cytogenetics and 78% among patients with intermediate-risk disease. In addition, the combination was effective among patients with both primary de novo AML (68%) and secondary AML (related to myelodysplasia or myeloproliferative neoplasms or previous therapy; 73%).

Overall survival after a median of 9 months since the first dose of the study drug was estimated to be 79% at 6 months and 70% at 12 months, with the median not reached.

Treatment-related adverse events were similar between the decitabine- and azacitidine-containing arms at the given dose of venetoclax. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events included thrombocytopenia in 56% of patients on the 400-mg dose of venetoclax and in 32% of those on the 800-mg dose. Grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 48% and 30%, respectively, and neutropenia in 40% and 32%.

A phase 3 study of venetoclax at the 400-mg dose with azacitidine has been initiated. NCT02993523 is currently enrolling patients, Dr. Pratz said.

The study was supported by Abbvie and Genentech. Dr. Pratz disclosed research funding from Abbvie and other companies.

The answer to the billion dollar question – Does the chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) construct CTL019 (tisagenlecleucel-T) have a favorable risk-benefit profile for the treatment of children and young adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia? – was a unanimous “yes” at a July 12 meeting of the Food and Drug Administration’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.

“This is the most exciting thing I have seen in my lifetime, and probably since the introduction of ‘multiagent total cancer care,’ as it was called then, for treatment of childhood leukemia,” remarked Timothy P. Cripe, MD, PhD, from Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio, and a temporary voting member of the ODAC.

Catherine M. Bollard, MD, MBChB, from the Children’s National Medical Center in Washington, also a temporary ODAC member, said that she voted “yes” because “this is a very poor-risk patient population, this is an unmet need in the pediatric population, and as you saw in the data [presented to ODAC] today, the clinical responses are remarkable. I think Novartis [the maker of CTL019] has done a great job putting together a plan for mitigating risk going forward.”

CTL019 was shown in a pivotal phase 2 clinical trial to induce an overall remission rate of 83% in children and young adults with relapsed/refractory ALL for whom at least two prior lines of therapy had failed. Based on these results, the FDA accepted a biologics license application for the agent from Novartis.

At the meeting, panel members initially seemed favorably disposed toward recommending approval but heard concerns from FDA scientists about the potential for severe or fatal adverse events such as the cytokine release syndrome (CRS); the possible generation of replication competent retrovirus (RCR); and the potential for secondary malignancies from insertional mutagenesis, the incorporation of portions of the lentiviral vector into the patient’s genome.

In his opening remarks, Wilson W. Bryan, MD, from the FDA’s Office of Tissue and Advanced Therapies and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Drug Research, commented that “the clinical development of tisagenlecleucel suggests that this is a life-saving product.”

He went on, however, to frame the FDA’s concerns: “Clinical trials are not always a good predictor of the effectiveness and safety of a marketed product,” he said. “In particular, we are concerned that the same benefit and safety seen in clinical trials may not carry over to routine clinical use.”

The purpose of the hearing was to focus on manufacturing issues related to product quality, including replicability of the product for commercial use and safety issues such as prevention of CRS and neurotoxicities.

“We are also concerned about the hypothetical risk of secondary malignancies. Therefore, we are asking for the committee’s recommendations regarding the nature and duration of follow-up of patients who would receive this product,” Dr. Bryan said.

“CTL019 is a living drug, which demonstrates activity after a single infusion,” said Samit Hirawat, MD, head of oncology global development for Novartis.

But the nature of CTL019 as a living drug also means that it is subject to variations in the ability of autologous T cells harvested via leukapheresis to be infected with the lentiviral vector and expanded into a population of CAR T cells large enough to have therapeutic value, said Xiaobin Victor Lu, PhD, a chemistry, manufacturing, and controls reviewer for the FDA.

Mitigation plan

Novartis’ proposed plan includes specific, long-term steps for mitigating the risk of CRS and neurologic events, such as cerebral edema, the latter of which caused the FDA to call for a clinical hold of the phase 2 ROCKET trial for a different CAR T-cell construct.

Among the proposed elements of the mitigation plan are a 15-year minimum pharmacovigilance program and long-term safety follow-up for adverse events related to the therapy, efficacy, immunogenicity, transgene persistence of CD19 CAR, and the incidence of second malignancies possibly related to insertional mutagenesis.

Novartis also will train treatment center staff on processes for cell collection, cryopreservation, transport, chain of identity, safety management, and logistics for handling the CAR T-cell product. The company proposes to provide on-site training of personnel on CRS and neurotoxicity risk and management, as well as to offer information to patients and caregivers about the signs and symptoms of adverse events of concern.

Dr. Cripe expressed his concerns that Novartis’ proposal to initially limit the mitigation plan to 30 or 35 treatment sites would create problems of access and economic disparities among patients, and could cause inequities among treatment centers even with the same city.

David Lebwohl, MD, head of the CAR T global program for Novartis, said that the planned number of sites for the mitigation program would be expanded after 6 to 12 months if the CAR T construct receives final approval and clinical implementation goes well.

There was nearly unanimous agreement among the panel members that the planned 15-year follow-up and other mitigation measures would be adequate for detecting serious short- and long-term consequences of CAR T-cell therapy.

Patient/advocate perspective

In the public comment section of the proceedings, panel members were urged to vote in favor of CTL019 by parents of children with ALL, including Don McMahon, whose son Connor received the therapy after multiple relapses, and Tom Whitehead, father of Emily Whitehead, the first patient to receive CAR T cells for ALL.

Both children are alive and doing well.

CTL019 is produced by Novartis.

The answer to the billion dollar question – Does the chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) construct CTL019 (tisagenlecleucel-T) have a favorable risk-benefit profile for the treatment of children and young adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia? – was a unanimous “yes” at a July 12 meeting of the Food and Drug Administration’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.

“This is the most exciting thing I have seen in my lifetime, and probably since the introduction of ‘multiagent total cancer care,’ as it was called then, for treatment of childhood leukemia,” remarked Timothy P. Cripe, MD, PhD, from Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio, and a temporary voting member of the ODAC.

Catherine M. Bollard, MD, MBChB, from the Children’s National Medical Center in Washington, also a temporary ODAC member, said that she voted “yes” because “this is a very poor-risk patient population, this is an unmet need in the pediatric population, and as you saw in the data [presented to ODAC] today, the clinical responses are remarkable. I think Novartis [the maker of CTL019] has done a great job putting together a plan for mitigating risk going forward.”

CTL019 was shown in a pivotal phase 2 clinical trial to induce an overall remission rate of 83% in children and young adults with relapsed/refractory ALL for whom at least two prior lines of therapy had failed. Based on these results, the FDA accepted a biologics license application for the agent from Novartis.

At the meeting, panel members initially seemed favorably disposed toward recommending approval but heard concerns from FDA scientists about the potential for severe or fatal adverse events such as the cytokine release syndrome (CRS); the possible generation of replication competent retrovirus (RCR); and the potential for secondary malignancies from insertional mutagenesis, the incorporation of portions of the lentiviral vector into the patient’s genome.

In his opening remarks, Wilson W. Bryan, MD, from the FDA’s Office of Tissue and Advanced Therapies and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Drug Research, commented that “the clinical development of tisagenlecleucel suggests that this is a life-saving product.”

He went on, however, to frame the FDA’s concerns: “Clinical trials are not always a good predictor of the effectiveness and safety of a marketed product,” he said. “In particular, we are concerned that the same benefit and safety seen in clinical trials may not carry over to routine clinical use.”

The purpose of the hearing was to focus on manufacturing issues related to product quality, including replicability of the product for commercial use and safety issues such as prevention of CRS and neurotoxicities.

“We are also concerned about the hypothetical risk of secondary malignancies. Therefore, we are asking for the committee’s recommendations regarding the nature and duration of follow-up of patients who would receive this product,” Dr. Bryan said.

“CTL019 is a living drug, which demonstrates activity after a single infusion,” said Samit Hirawat, MD, head of oncology global development for Novartis.

But the nature of CTL019 as a living drug also means that it is subject to variations in the ability of autologous T cells harvested via leukapheresis to be infected with the lentiviral vector and expanded into a population of CAR T cells large enough to have therapeutic value, said Xiaobin Victor Lu, PhD, a chemistry, manufacturing, and controls reviewer for the FDA.

Mitigation plan

Novartis’ proposed plan includes specific, long-term steps for mitigating the risk of CRS and neurologic events, such as cerebral edema, the latter of which caused the FDA to call for a clinical hold of the phase 2 ROCKET trial for a different CAR T-cell construct.

Among the proposed elements of the mitigation plan are a 15-year minimum pharmacovigilance program and long-term safety follow-up for adverse events related to the therapy, efficacy, immunogenicity, transgene persistence of CD19 CAR, and the incidence of second malignancies possibly related to insertional mutagenesis.

Novartis also will train treatment center staff on processes for cell collection, cryopreservation, transport, chain of identity, safety management, and logistics for handling the CAR T-cell product. The company proposes to provide on-site training of personnel on CRS and neurotoxicity risk and management, as well as to offer information to patients and caregivers about the signs and symptoms of adverse events of concern.

Dr. Cripe expressed his concerns that Novartis’ proposal to initially limit the mitigation plan to 30 or 35 treatment sites would create problems of access and economic disparities among patients, and could cause inequities among treatment centers even with the same city.

David Lebwohl, MD, head of the CAR T global program for Novartis, said that the planned number of sites for the mitigation program would be expanded after 6 to 12 months if the CAR T construct receives final approval and clinical implementation goes well.

There was nearly unanimous agreement among the panel members that the planned 15-year follow-up and other mitigation measures would be adequate for detecting serious short- and long-term consequences of CAR T-cell therapy.

Patient/advocate perspective

In the public comment section of the proceedings, panel members were urged to vote in favor of CTL019 by parents of children with ALL, including Don McMahon, whose son Connor received the therapy after multiple relapses, and Tom Whitehead, father of Emily Whitehead, the first patient to receive CAR T cells for ALL.

Both children are alive and doing well.

CTL019 is produced by Novartis.

The answer to the billion dollar question – Does the chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) construct CTL019 (tisagenlecleucel-T) have a favorable risk-benefit profile for the treatment of children and young adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia? – was a unanimous “yes” at a July 12 meeting of the Food and Drug Administration’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.

“This is the most exciting thing I have seen in my lifetime, and probably since the introduction of ‘multiagent total cancer care,’ as it was called then, for treatment of childhood leukemia,” remarked Timothy P. Cripe, MD, PhD, from Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio, and a temporary voting member of the ODAC.

Catherine M. Bollard, MD, MBChB, from the Children’s National Medical Center in Washington, also a temporary ODAC member, said that she voted “yes” because “this is a very poor-risk patient population, this is an unmet need in the pediatric population, and as you saw in the data [presented to ODAC] today, the clinical responses are remarkable. I think Novartis [the maker of CTL019] has done a great job putting together a plan for mitigating risk going forward.”

CTL019 was shown in a pivotal phase 2 clinical trial to induce an overall remission rate of 83% in children and young adults with relapsed/refractory ALL for whom at least two prior lines of therapy had failed. Based on these results, the FDA accepted a biologics license application for the agent from Novartis.

At the meeting, panel members initially seemed favorably disposed toward recommending approval but heard concerns from FDA scientists about the potential for severe or fatal adverse events such as the cytokine release syndrome (CRS); the possible generation of replication competent retrovirus (RCR); and the potential for secondary malignancies from insertional mutagenesis, the incorporation of portions of the lentiviral vector into the patient’s genome.

In his opening remarks, Wilson W. Bryan, MD, from the FDA’s Office of Tissue and Advanced Therapies and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Drug Research, commented that “the clinical development of tisagenlecleucel suggests that this is a life-saving product.”

He went on, however, to frame the FDA’s concerns: “Clinical trials are not always a good predictor of the effectiveness and safety of a marketed product,” he said. “In particular, we are concerned that the same benefit and safety seen in clinical trials may not carry over to routine clinical use.”

The purpose of the hearing was to focus on manufacturing issues related to product quality, including replicability of the product for commercial use and safety issues such as prevention of CRS and neurotoxicities.

“We are also concerned about the hypothetical risk of secondary malignancies. Therefore, we are asking for the committee’s recommendations regarding the nature and duration of follow-up of patients who would receive this product,” Dr. Bryan said.

“CTL019 is a living drug, which demonstrates activity after a single infusion,” said Samit Hirawat, MD, head of oncology global development for Novartis.

But the nature of CTL019 as a living drug also means that it is subject to variations in the ability of autologous T cells harvested via leukapheresis to be infected with the lentiviral vector and expanded into a population of CAR T cells large enough to have therapeutic value, said Xiaobin Victor Lu, PhD, a chemistry, manufacturing, and controls reviewer for the FDA.

Mitigation plan

Novartis’ proposed plan includes specific, long-term steps for mitigating the risk of CRS and neurologic events, such as cerebral edema, the latter of which caused the FDA to call for a clinical hold of the phase 2 ROCKET trial for a different CAR T-cell construct.

Among the proposed elements of the mitigation plan are a 15-year minimum pharmacovigilance program and long-term safety follow-up for adverse events related to the therapy, efficacy, immunogenicity, transgene persistence of CD19 CAR, and the incidence of second malignancies possibly related to insertional mutagenesis.

Novartis also will train treatment center staff on processes for cell collection, cryopreservation, transport, chain of identity, safety management, and logistics for handling the CAR T-cell product. The company proposes to provide on-site training of personnel on CRS and neurotoxicity risk and management, as well as to offer information to patients and caregivers about the signs and symptoms of adverse events of concern.

Dr. Cripe expressed his concerns that Novartis’ proposal to initially limit the mitigation plan to 30 or 35 treatment sites would create problems of access and economic disparities among patients, and could cause inequities among treatment centers even with the same city.

David Lebwohl, MD, head of the CAR T global program for Novartis, said that the planned number of sites for the mitigation program would be expanded after 6 to 12 months if the CAR T construct receives final approval and clinical implementation goes well.

There was nearly unanimous agreement among the panel members that the planned 15-year follow-up and other mitigation measures would be adequate for detecting serious short- and long-term consequences of CAR T-cell therapy.

Patient/advocate perspective

In the public comment section of the proceedings, panel members were urged to vote in favor of CTL019 by parents of children with ALL, including Don McMahon, whose son Connor received the therapy after multiple relapses, and Tom Whitehead, father of Emily Whitehead, the first patient to receive CAR T cells for ALL.

Both children are alive and doing well.

CTL019 is produced by Novartis.

MADRID – Monotherapy with the investigational oral agent enasidenib was associated with comparatively high response rates among patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and IDH2 mutations in a phase 1/2 study.

Among 214 patients treated at a dose level of 100 mg daily, the overall response rate was 37%, including 20.1% complete responses (CRs) and 7.9% complete responses with incomplete recovery of platelets (CRp) or incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), reported Eytan M. Stein, MD, an internist and hematologic oncologist at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

“In patients with relapsed/refractory AML (with IDH2 mutations), most of whom had received multiple prior AML treatments, enasidenib induced durable CRs that were associated with overall survival of greater than 8 months,” he said at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association.

The IDH2 gene encodes for isocitrate dehydrogenase 2, which is an enzyme of the citric acid cycle. An estimated 8%-15% of patients with AML have mutations in IDH2 that cause intracellular accumulation of beta-hydroxyglutarate, which leads to blockage of myeloblast differentiation through a variety of mechanisms. The primary mechanism of action of enasidenib appears to be through its action on differentiation, rather than through cytotoxicity, Dr. Stein said.

He reported updated results from the fully enrolled cohorts of the phase 1/2 study. Earlier data from the study were reported at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and in a paper published concurrently in Blood.

In the study, the investigators first enrolled 113 patients with advanced hematologic malignancies with IDH2 mutations and treated them with cumulative daily doses of enasidenib ranging from 50 to 650 mg.

In a phase 1 expansion study at the established dose of 100 mg daily, 126 patients with IDH2 mutations were enrolled in one of four cohorts: patients aged 60 or older with relapsed or refractory AML or AML patients of any age who experienced a relapse after undergoing a bone marrow transplant (BMT); patients under age 60 except those with post-BMT relapses; patients with previously untreated AML who were 60 years or older who declined the standard of care; and patients with other hematologic malignancies who were ineligible for other study arms.

The study also included a phase 2 expansion cohort of 106 patients with relapsed/refractory AML with IDH2 mutations treated with enasidenib 100 mg daily. The data cutoff was Oct. 14, 2016.

Among 214 patients treated at the 100-mg/day dose, the ORR was 37%, including 20.1% with a CR, 7.9% with a CRp or CRi, 3.7% with partial responses, and 5.1% with a morphologic leukemia-free state.

The median time to first response was 1.9 months, and the median time to CR was 3.7 months.

Clinicians should wait until patients have received at least four cycles of the drug before determining whether they should be continued on the drug or switched to another therapy, Dr. Stein said.

After 30 months of follow-up, overall survival (OS) among the 281 patients with relapsed/refractory AML with IDH2 mutations who were treated with enasidenib at any dose level was 8.4 months. Among the 214 treated at the 100-mg daily dose level, the median OS was 8.3 months.

When the investigators looked at OS by best response, they saw that patients who had a CR had a median OS of 22.9 months. For patients with responses other than CR, the median OS was 15.1 months. For patients with no response to the drug, the median OS was 5.6 months.

Patients generally tolerated the drug well. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in severity.

An increase in blood bilirubin was the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse event, occurring in 8% of all patients. The effect was caused by an off-target reaction and was not associated with elevations in liver enzymes or evidence of liver damage, Dr. Stein said.

Grade 3 or 4 dyspnea occurred in 6% of patients, and 7% of all patients had serious treatment-related IDH-inhibitor–associated differentiation syndrome (IDH-DS). This syndrome presents with symptoms similar to those of retinoic acid syndrome, which occurs during treatment for acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Enasidenib is being explored in a phase 3 study comparing enasidenib monotherapy with conventional care in patients with late-stage AML and in combination with other agents and regimens in phase 1/2 studies in patients with newly diagnosed AML with IDH2 mutations.

Enasidenib has been granted priority review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for relapsed/refractory AML with an IDH2 mutation and has been given a Prescription Drug User Fee Act action date of Aug. 30, 2017, according to Celgene.

The study was funded by Celgene. Dr. Stein disclosed a consulting/advisory role with the company, research funding, and travel expenses.

MADRID – Monotherapy with the investigational oral agent enasidenib was associated with comparatively high response rates among patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and IDH2 mutations in a phase 1/2 study.

Among 214 patients treated at a dose level of 100 mg daily, the overall response rate was 37%, including 20.1% complete responses (CRs) and 7.9% complete responses with incomplete recovery of platelets (CRp) or incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), reported Eytan M. Stein, MD, an internist and hematologic oncologist at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

“In patients with relapsed/refractory AML (with IDH2 mutations), most of whom had received multiple prior AML treatments, enasidenib induced durable CRs that were associated with overall survival of greater than 8 months,” he said at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association.

The IDH2 gene encodes for isocitrate dehydrogenase 2, which is an enzyme of the citric acid cycle. An estimated 8%-15% of patients with AML have mutations in IDH2 that cause intracellular accumulation of beta-hydroxyglutarate, which leads to blockage of myeloblast differentiation through a variety of mechanisms. The primary mechanism of action of enasidenib appears to be through its action on differentiation, rather than through cytotoxicity, Dr. Stein said.

He reported updated results from the fully enrolled cohorts of the phase 1/2 study. Earlier data from the study were reported at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and in a paper published concurrently in Blood.

In the study, the investigators first enrolled 113 patients with advanced hematologic malignancies with IDH2 mutations and treated them with cumulative daily doses of enasidenib ranging from 50 to 650 mg.

In a phase 1 expansion study at the established dose of 100 mg daily, 126 patients with IDH2 mutations were enrolled in one of four cohorts: patients aged 60 or older with relapsed or refractory AML or AML patients of any age who experienced a relapse after undergoing a bone marrow transplant (BMT); patients under age 60 except those with post-BMT relapses; patients with previously untreated AML who were 60 years or older who declined the standard of care; and patients with other hematologic malignancies who were ineligible for other study arms.

The study also included a phase 2 expansion cohort of 106 patients with relapsed/refractory AML with IDH2 mutations treated with enasidenib 100 mg daily. The data cutoff was Oct. 14, 2016.

Among 214 patients treated at the 100-mg/day dose, the ORR was 37%, including 20.1% with a CR, 7.9% with a CRp or CRi, 3.7% with partial responses, and 5.1% with a morphologic leukemia-free state.

The median time to first response was 1.9 months, and the median time to CR was 3.7 months.

Clinicians should wait until patients have received at least four cycles of the drug before determining whether they should be continued on the drug or switched to another therapy, Dr. Stein said.

After 30 months of follow-up, overall survival (OS) among the 281 patients with relapsed/refractory AML with IDH2 mutations who were treated with enasidenib at any dose level was 8.4 months. Among the 214 treated at the 100-mg daily dose level, the median OS was 8.3 months.

When the investigators looked at OS by best response, they saw that patients who had a CR had a median OS of 22.9 months. For patients with responses other than CR, the median OS was 15.1 months. For patients with no response to the drug, the median OS was 5.6 months.

Patients generally tolerated the drug well. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in severity.

An increase in blood bilirubin was the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse event, occurring in 8% of all patients. The effect was caused by an off-target reaction and was not associated with elevations in liver enzymes or evidence of liver damage, Dr. Stein said.

Grade 3 or 4 dyspnea occurred in 6% of patients, and 7% of all patients had serious treatment-related IDH-inhibitor–associated differentiation syndrome (IDH-DS). This syndrome presents with symptoms similar to those of retinoic acid syndrome, which occurs during treatment for acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Enasidenib is being explored in a phase 3 study comparing enasidenib monotherapy with conventional care in patients with late-stage AML and in combination with other agents and regimens in phase 1/2 studies in patients with newly diagnosed AML with IDH2 mutations.

Enasidenib has been granted priority review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for relapsed/refractory AML with an IDH2 mutation and has been given a Prescription Drug User Fee Act action date of Aug. 30, 2017, according to Celgene.

The study was funded by Celgene. Dr. Stein disclosed a consulting/advisory role with the company, research funding, and travel expenses.

MADRID – Monotherapy with the investigational oral agent enasidenib was associated with comparatively high response rates among patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and IDH2 mutations in a phase 1/2 study.

Among 214 patients treated at a dose level of 100 mg daily, the overall response rate was 37%, including 20.1% complete responses (CRs) and 7.9% complete responses with incomplete recovery of platelets (CRp) or incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), reported Eytan M. Stein, MD, an internist and hematologic oncologist at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

“In patients with relapsed/refractory AML (with IDH2 mutations), most of whom had received multiple prior AML treatments, enasidenib induced durable CRs that were associated with overall survival of greater than 8 months,” he said at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association.

The IDH2 gene encodes for isocitrate dehydrogenase 2, which is an enzyme of the citric acid cycle. An estimated 8%-15% of patients with AML have mutations in IDH2 that cause intracellular accumulation of beta-hydroxyglutarate, which leads to blockage of myeloblast differentiation through a variety of mechanisms. The primary mechanism of action of enasidenib appears to be through its action on differentiation, rather than through cytotoxicity, Dr. Stein said.

He reported updated results from the fully enrolled cohorts of the phase 1/2 study. Earlier data from the study were reported at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and in a paper published concurrently in Blood.

In the study, the investigators first enrolled 113 patients with advanced hematologic malignancies with IDH2 mutations and treated them with cumulative daily doses of enasidenib ranging from 50 to 650 mg.

In a phase 1 expansion study at the established dose of 100 mg daily, 126 patients with IDH2 mutations were enrolled in one of four cohorts: patients aged 60 or older with relapsed or refractory AML or AML patients of any age who experienced a relapse after undergoing a bone marrow transplant (BMT); patients under age 60 except those with post-BMT relapses; patients with previously untreated AML who were 60 years or older who declined the standard of care; and patients with other hematologic malignancies who were ineligible for other study arms.

The study also included a phase 2 expansion cohort of 106 patients with relapsed/refractory AML with IDH2 mutations treated with enasidenib 100 mg daily. The data cutoff was Oct. 14, 2016.

Among 214 patients treated at the 100-mg/day dose, the ORR was 37%, including 20.1% with a CR, 7.9% with a CRp or CRi, 3.7% with partial responses, and 5.1% with a morphologic leukemia-free state.

The median time to first response was 1.9 months, and the median time to CR was 3.7 months.

Clinicians should wait until patients have received at least four cycles of the drug before determining whether they should be continued on the drug or switched to another therapy, Dr. Stein said.

After 30 months of follow-up, overall survival (OS) among the 281 patients with relapsed/refractory AML with IDH2 mutations who were treated with enasidenib at any dose level was 8.4 months. Among the 214 treated at the 100-mg daily dose level, the median OS was 8.3 months.

When the investigators looked at OS by best response, they saw that patients who had a CR had a median OS of 22.9 months. For patients with responses other than CR, the median OS was 15.1 months. For patients with no response to the drug, the median OS was 5.6 months.

Patients generally tolerated the drug well. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in severity.

An increase in blood bilirubin was the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse event, occurring in 8% of all patients. The effect was caused by an off-target reaction and was not associated with elevations in liver enzymes or evidence of liver damage, Dr. Stein said.

Grade 3 or 4 dyspnea occurred in 6% of patients, and 7% of all patients had serious treatment-related IDH-inhibitor–associated differentiation syndrome (IDH-DS). This syndrome presents with symptoms similar to those of retinoic acid syndrome, which occurs during treatment for acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Enasidenib is being explored in a phase 3 study comparing enasidenib monotherapy with conventional care in patients with late-stage AML and in combination with other agents and regimens in phase 1/2 studies in patients with newly diagnosed AML with IDH2 mutations.

Enasidenib has been granted priority review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for relapsed/refractory AML with an IDH2 mutation and has been given a Prescription Drug User Fee Act action date of Aug. 30, 2017, according to Celgene.

The study was funded by Celgene. Dr. Stein disclosed a consulting/advisory role with the company, research funding, and travel expenses.

LUGANO, SWITZERLAND – Copanlisib, an investigational intravenous inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), was associated with “promising” efficacy and a better safety profile than has been seen with oral PI3K inhibitors in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent lymphomas.

In a phase 2 trial of the drug as monotherapy in patients with indolent lymphomas, copanlisib was associated with an overall response rate of 58.6% among 104 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), including 14.4% complete responses (CR) and 44.2% partial responses (PR), reported Martin Dreyling, MD, of the Universität München-Grosshadern in Munich, Germany.

“The favorable risk-benefit profile of this compound suggests further [need for] testing in follicular lymphoma. My personal interpretation is that the different safety profile is due to the intermittent dosing and the IV application, avoiding adverse cause-effect both in the gut and the liver,” he said at the 14th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma.

Dr. Dreyling noted that the oral PI3K inhibitor idelalisib (Zydelig) is approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia in combination with rituximab and in patients with relapsed FL or small lymphocytic lymphomas (SLL) who have received at least two prior lines of systemic therapy. This agent, however, carries a black box warning about fatal and serious toxicities, including hepatic events, severe diarrhea, colitis, pneumonitis, infections, and intestinal perforation.

Copanlisib inhibits all isoforms of P13K but is predominantly active against the alpha and delta isoforms of the kinase. The alpha form, expressed in many cell types, is involved in insulin signaling and angiogenesis and in resistance mechanisms to lymphoma. The delta form, expressed in leukocytes, is involved in B-cell signaling, development, and survival, making PIK3 an attractive target, Dr. Dreyling explained.

The study included patients with indolent B-cell lymphomas, including FL grades 1-3a, marginal zone lymphoma, SLL, or lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM) for whom at least two prior lines of therapy had failed.

The patients received copanlisib 60 mg IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Of 142 assigned to and started on treatment, 46 patients (32.3%) remained on treatment at the time of data cutoff. Of the 96 patients (67.7%) who discontinued, 35 did so because of adverse events, 36 discontinued for radiologic or clinical evidence of progression, 16 withdrew, 5 were discontinued on the treating physician’s decision, and 4 stopped for other, unspecified reasons.

Among all 142 patients, the median duration of therapy was 22 weeks and the median number of cycles was 5.5. In all, 26.1% of patients required a dosage reduction to 45 mg, and 5.6% required reduction to 30 mg.

As noted, the objective tumor response rate (ORR) among patients was 58.6% for 104 patients with FL. For the 23 patients with marginal zone lymphoma, the ORR was 69.6%, consisting of two complete and 14 partial responses. Among eight patients with SLL, there were six partial responses and no complete responses. For the six patients with LPL/WM, there was one partial response.

The overall median duration of response was 22.6 months. Among patients with refractory disease and in all patients with FL the median duration of response was 12.2 months.

The median progression-free survival after 24 months of follow-up was 11.2 months for all patients. The median overall survival has not been reached.

The most frequent adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were hyperglycemia in 40.1% (33.1% grade 3 and 7.0% grade 4) and hypertension in 22.5% (all grade 3).

Grade 3 diarrhea, a significant problem with idelalisib, occurred in 4.2% of patients, and there were no grade 4 events.

Grade 3 pneumonitis was seen in two patients, and one had grade 4 colitis. There were three drug related deaths, including one patient each from lung infection, respiratory failure, or thromboembolic event..

The study was supported by Bayer. Dr. Dreyling disclosed receiving honoraria from the company and serving on a scientific/advisory board for the company.

LUGANO, SWITZERLAND – Copanlisib, an investigational intravenous inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), was associated with “promising” efficacy and a better safety profile than has been seen with oral PI3K inhibitors in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent lymphomas.

In a phase 2 trial of the drug as monotherapy in patients with indolent lymphomas, copanlisib was associated with an overall response rate of 58.6% among 104 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), including 14.4% complete responses (CR) and 44.2% partial responses (PR), reported Martin Dreyling, MD, of the Universität München-Grosshadern in Munich, Germany.

“The favorable risk-benefit profile of this compound suggests further [need for] testing in follicular lymphoma. My personal interpretation is that the different safety profile is due to the intermittent dosing and the IV application, avoiding adverse cause-effect both in the gut and the liver,” he said at the 14th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma.

Dr. Dreyling noted that the oral PI3K inhibitor idelalisib (Zydelig) is approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia in combination with rituximab and in patients with relapsed FL or small lymphocytic lymphomas (SLL) who have received at least two prior lines of systemic therapy. This agent, however, carries a black box warning about fatal and serious toxicities, including hepatic events, severe diarrhea, colitis, pneumonitis, infections, and intestinal perforation.

Copanlisib inhibits all isoforms of P13K but is predominantly active against the alpha and delta isoforms of the kinase. The alpha form, expressed in many cell types, is involved in insulin signaling and angiogenesis and in resistance mechanisms to lymphoma. The delta form, expressed in leukocytes, is involved in B-cell signaling, development, and survival, making PIK3 an attractive target, Dr. Dreyling explained.

The study included patients with indolent B-cell lymphomas, including FL grades 1-3a, marginal zone lymphoma, SLL, or lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM) for whom at least two prior lines of therapy had failed.

The patients received copanlisib 60 mg IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Of 142 assigned to and started on treatment, 46 patients (32.3%) remained on treatment at the time of data cutoff. Of the 96 patients (67.7%) who discontinued, 35 did so because of adverse events, 36 discontinued for radiologic or clinical evidence of progression, 16 withdrew, 5 were discontinued on the treating physician’s decision, and 4 stopped for other, unspecified reasons.

Among all 142 patients, the median duration of therapy was 22 weeks and the median number of cycles was 5.5. In all, 26.1% of patients required a dosage reduction to 45 mg, and 5.6% required reduction to 30 mg.

As noted, the objective tumor response rate (ORR) among patients was 58.6% for 104 patients with FL. For the 23 patients with marginal zone lymphoma, the ORR was 69.6%, consisting of two complete and 14 partial responses. Among eight patients with SLL, there were six partial responses and no complete responses. For the six patients with LPL/WM, there was one partial response.

The overall median duration of response was 22.6 months. Among patients with refractory disease and in all patients with FL the median duration of response was 12.2 months.

The median progression-free survival after 24 months of follow-up was 11.2 months for all patients. The median overall survival has not been reached.

The most frequent adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were hyperglycemia in 40.1% (33.1% grade 3 and 7.0% grade 4) and hypertension in 22.5% (all grade 3).

Grade 3 diarrhea, a significant problem with idelalisib, occurred in 4.2% of patients, and there were no grade 4 events.

Grade 3 pneumonitis was seen in two patients, and one had grade 4 colitis. There were three drug related deaths, including one patient each from lung infection, respiratory failure, or thromboembolic event..

The study was supported by Bayer. Dr. Dreyling disclosed receiving honoraria from the company and serving on a scientific/advisory board for the company.

LUGANO, SWITZERLAND – Copanlisib, an investigational intravenous inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), was associated with “promising” efficacy and a better safety profile than has been seen with oral PI3K inhibitors in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent lymphomas.

In a phase 2 trial of the drug as monotherapy in patients with indolent lymphomas, copanlisib was associated with an overall response rate of 58.6% among 104 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), including 14.4% complete responses (CR) and 44.2% partial responses (PR), reported Martin Dreyling, MD, of the Universität München-Grosshadern in Munich, Germany.

“The favorable risk-benefit profile of this compound suggests further [need for] testing in follicular lymphoma. My personal interpretation is that the different safety profile is due to the intermittent dosing and the IV application, avoiding adverse cause-effect both in the gut and the liver,” he said at the 14th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma.

Dr. Dreyling noted that the oral PI3K inhibitor idelalisib (Zydelig) is approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia in combination with rituximab and in patients with relapsed FL or small lymphocytic lymphomas (SLL) who have received at least two prior lines of systemic therapy. This agent, however, carries a black box warning about fatal and serious toxicities, including hepatic events, severe diarrhea, colitis, pneumonitis, infections, and intestinal perforation.

Copanlisib inhibits all isoforms of P13K but is predominantly active against the alpha and delta isoforms of the kinase. The alpha form, expressed in many cell types, is involved in insulin signaling and angiogenesis and in resistance mechanisms to lymphoma. The delta form, expressed in leukocytes, is involved in B-cell signaling, development, and survival, making PIK3 an attractive target, Dr. Dreyling explained.

The study included patients with indolent B-cell lymphomas, including FL grades 1-3a, marginal zone lymphoma, SLL, or lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM) for whom at least two prior lines of therapy had failed.

The patients received copanlisib 60 mg IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Of 142 assigned to and started on treatment, 46 patients (32.3%) remained on treatment at the time of data cutoff. Of the 96 patients (67.7%) who discontinued, 35 did so because of adverse events, 36 discontinued for radiologic or clinical evidence of progression, 16 withdrew, 5 were discontinued on the treating physician’s decision, and 4 stopped for other, unspecified reasons.

Among all 142 patients, the median duration of therapy was 22 weeks and the median number of cycles was 5.5. In all, 26.1% of patients required a dosage reduction to 45 mg, and 5.6% required reduction to 30 mg.

As noted, the objective tumor response rate (ORR) among patients was 58.6% for 104 patients with FL. For the 23 patients with marginal zone lymphoma, the ORR was 69.6%, consisting of two complete and 14 partial responses. Among eight patients with SLL, there were six partial responses and no complete responses. For the six patients with LPL/WM, there was one partial response.

The overall median duration of response was 22.6 months. Among patients with refractory disease and in all patients with FL the median duration of response was 12.2 months.

The median progression-free survival after 24 months of follow-up was 11.2 months for all patients. The median overall survival has not been reached.

The most frequent adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were hyperglycemia in 40.1% (33.1% grade 3 and 7.0% grade 4) and hypertension in 22.5% (all grade 3).

Grade 3 diarrhea, a significant problem with idelalisib, occurred in 4.2% of patients, and there were no grade 4 events.

Grade 3 pneumonitis was seen in two patients, and one had grade 4 colitis. There were three drug related deaths, including one patient each from lung infection, respiratory failure, or thromboembolic event..

The study was supported by Bayer. Dr. Dreyling disclosed receiving honoraria from the company and serving on a scientific/advisory board for the company.

LUGANO, SWITZERLAND – Tazemetostat, a first-in-class experimental agent that inhibits an oncogenic protein, shows efficacy in patients with heavily pretreated, relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), interim results from a phase II study suggest.

Among patients with relapsed/refractory FL who had mutations in EZH2 (enhancer of zeste homolog 2), a member of a family of proteins that are involved in epigenetic gene silencing, the overall response rate (ORR) was 92%, reported Franck Morschhauser, MD, PhD, of the University of Lille, France.

Neil Osterweil/Frontline Medical News

Large multicenter study

Dr. Morschhauser reported interim results from a global, multi-center open-label study of tazemetostat in six cohorts of patients with relapsed/refractory FL (two monotherapy cohorts of 45 patients each) or DLBCL (three monotherapy cohorts of 60 patients each). A sixth cohort consisting of 70 patients with DLBCL treated with tazemetostat and prednisolone was added in 2017.

In the ongoing trial, patients receive oral tazemetostat 800 mg twice daily until disease progression or withdrawal from study, and are being followed for ORR, progression-free survival, overall survival, duration-of response, safety, and pharmacokinetics.

The longest follow-up at the time of data cutoff was approximately 18 months. Among 13 evaluable patients with FL with EZH2 mutations, the ORR was 92%, including one complete response (CR) and 11 partial responses (PR). In contrast, the ORR for 54 patients with FL and wild-type EZH2 was 28%, consisting of three CRs and 11 PRs. One patient with mutated EZH2 and 23 with wild-type EZH2 had stable disease.

Among 17 patients with DLBCL and EZH2 mutations, the ORR was 29%, consisting of 5 PR. For 119 patients with wild-type EZH2, the ORR was 15%, consisting of 10 CR and 8 PR. Six patients with mutations and 22 with wild-type EZH2 had stable disease.

Among the patients with FL, 75% had significant reduction in tumor burden.

The time to response ranged from 2 months to 1 year, with a median of approximately 4 months.

The variability in time to response “makes it a little bit tricky to calculate response duration,” Dr. Morschhauser said.

The drug had a “favorable” safety profile, with treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or greater in more than 5% of patients including thrombocytopenias in 6% of patients, anemias in 4%, and neutropenias in 6%. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to dose reductions occurred in 4% of patients, and those leading to drug discontinuation or study withdrawal occurred in 12% of patients.

In a retrospective analysis, the investigators performed molecular profiling studies using next-generation sequencing to look for predictors of response to tazemetostat. They found that patients most likely to respond to tazemetostat were those with activating mutations in EZH2 and MYD88. In contrast, patients with mutations HIST1H1E or MYC were not likely to respond.

Thomas E. Witzig, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., the invited discussant, said that the study is important because “it provides proof of principle that attacking the methylation issue, attacking one of these enzymes, is very important and can produce single-agent responses.

“It also demonstrates the value of mutation status, and this trial knowledge of that mutation status has actually changed the trial design, so that now they are only putting patients on with mutations,” he said.

The trial also raises the possibility of targeting other parts of the methylation pathway to treat cancer, he added.

The study was sponsored by Epizyme, the maker of tazemetostat. Dr. Morschhauser disclosed receiving honoraria from and serving on advisory boards for both companies. Dr. Witzig has disclosed grants for clinical trials from Novartis and Wyeth, and he has served on advisory boards for Cephalon, Novartis, and Wyeth.

LUGANO, SWITZERLAND – Tazemetostat, a first-in-class experimental agent that inhibits an oncogenic protein, shows efficacy in patients with heavily pretreated, relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), interim results from a phase II study suggest.

Among patients with relapsed/refractory FL who had mutations in EZH2 (enhancer of zeste homolog 2), a member of a family of proteins that are involved in epigenetic gene silencing, the overall response rate (ORR) was 92%, reported Franck Morschhauser, MD, PhD, of the University of Lille, France.

Neil Osterweil/Frontline Medical News

Large multicenter study

Dr. Morschhauser reported interim results from a global, multi-center open-label study of tazemetostat in six cohorts of patients with relapsed/refractory FL (two monotherapy cohorts of 45 patients each) or DLBCL (three monotherapy cohorts of 60 patients each). A sixth cohort consisting of 70 patients with DLBCL treated with tazemetostat and prednisolone was added in 2017.

In the ongoing trial, patients receive oral tazemetostat 800 mg twice daily until disease progression or withdrawal from study, and are being followed for ORR, progression-free survival, overall survival, duration-of response, safety, and pharmacokinetics.

The longest follow-up at the time of data cutoff was approximately 18 months. Among 13 evaluable patients with FL with EZH2 mutations, the ORR was 92%, including one complete response (CR) and 11 partial responses (PR). In contrast, the ORR for 54 patients with FL and wild-type EZH2 was 28%, consisting of three CRs and 11 PRs. One patient with mutated EZH2 and 23 with wild-type EZH2 had stable disease.

Among 17 patients with DLBCL and EZH2 mutations, the ORR was 29%, consisting of 5 PR. For 119 patients with wild-type EZH2, the ORR was 15%, consisting of 10 CR and 8 PR. Six patients with mutations and 22 with wild-type EZH2 had stable disease.

Among the patients with FL, 75% had significant reduction in tumor burden.

The time to response ranged from 2 months to 1 year, with a median of approximately 4 months.

The variability in time to response “makes it a little bit tricky to calculate response duration,” Dr. Morschhauser said.

The drug had a “favorable” safety profile, with treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or greater in more than 5% of patients including thrombocytopenias in 6% of patients, anemias in 4%, and neutropenias in 6%. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to dose reductions occurred in 4% of patients, and those leading to drug discontinuation or study withdrawal occurred in 12% of patients.

In a retrospective analysis, the investigators performed molecular profiling studies using next-generation sequencing to look for predictors of response to tazemetostat. They found that patients most likely to respond to tazemetostat were those with activating mutations in EZH2 and MYD88. In contrast, patients with mutations HIST1H1E or MYC were not likely to respond.

Thomas E. Witzig, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., the invited discussant, said that the study is important because “it provides proof of principle that attacking the methylation issue, attacking one of these enzymes, is very important and can produce single-agent responses.

“It also demonstrates the value of mutation status, and this trial knowledge of that mutation status has actually changed the trial design, so that now they are only putting patients on with mutations,” he said.

The trial also raises the possibility of targeting other parts of the methylation pathway to treat cancer, he added.

The study was sponsored by Epizyme, the maker of tazemetostat. Dr. Morschhauser disclosed receiving honoraria from and serving on advisory boards for both companies. Dr. Witzig has disclosed grants for clinical trials from Novartis and Wyeth, and he has served on advisory boards for Cephalon, Novartis, and Wyeth.

LUGANO, SWITZERLAND – Tazemetostat, a first-in-class experimental agent that inhibits an oncogenic protein, shows efficacy in patients with heavily pretreated, relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), interim results from a phase II study suggest.

Among patients with relapsed/refractory FL who had mutations in EZH2 (enhancer of zeste homolog 2), a member of a family of proteins that are involved in epigenetic gene silencing, the overall response rate (ORR) was 92%, reported Franck Morschhauser, MD, PhD, of the University of Lille, France.

Neil Osterweil/Frontline Medical News

Large multicenter study

Dr. Morschhauser reported interim results from a global, multi-center open-label study of tazemetostat in six cohorts of patients with relapsed/refractory FL (two monotherapy cohorts of 45 patients each) or DLBCL (three monotherapy cohorts of 60 patients each). A sixth cohort consisting of 70 patients with DLBCL treated with tazemetostat and prednisolone was added in 2017.

In the ongoing trial, patients receive oral tazemetostat 800 mg twice daily until disease progression or withdrawal from study, and are being followed for ORR, progression-free survival, overall survival, duration-of response, safety, and pharmacokinetics.

The longest follow-up at the time of data cutoff was approximately 18 months. Among 13 evaluable patients with FL with EZH2 mutations, the ORR was 92%, including one complete response (CR) and 11 partial responses (PR). In contrast, the ORR for 54 patients with FL and wild-type EZH2 was 28%, consisting of three CRs and 11 PRs. One patient with mutated EZH2 and 23 with wild-type EZH2 had stable disease.

Among 17 patients with DLBCL and EZH2 mutations, the ORR was 29%, consisting of 5 PR. For 119 patients with wild-type EZH2, the ORR was 15%, consisting of 10 CR and 8 PR. Six patients with mutations and 22 with wild-type EZH2 had stable disease.

Among the patients with FL, 75% had significant reduction in tumor burden.

The time to response ranged from 2 months to 1 year, with a median of approximately 4 months.

The variability in time to response “makes it a little bit tricky to calculate response duration,” Dr. Morschhauser said.

The drug had a “favorable” safety profile, with treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or greater in more than 5% of patients including thrombocytopenias in 6% of patients, anemias in 4%, and neutropenias in 6%. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to dose reductions occurred in 4% of patients, and those leading to drug discontinuation or study withdrawal occurred in 12% of patients.

In a retrospective analysis, the investigators performed molecular profiling studies using next-generation sequencing to look for predictors of response to tazemetostat. They found that patients most likely to respond to tazemetostat were those with activating mutations in EZH2 and MYD88. In contrast, patients with mutations HIST1H1E or MYC were not likely to respond.

Thomas E. Witzig, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., the invited discussant, said that the study is important because “it provides proof of principle that attacking the methylation issue, attacking one of these enzymes, is very important and can produce single-agent responses.

“It also demonstrates the value of mutation status, and this trial knowledge of that mutation status has actually changed the trial design, so that now they are only putting patients on with mutations,” he said.

The trial also raises the possibility of targeting other parts of the methylation pathway to treat cancer, he added.

The study was sponsored by Epizyme, the maker of tazemetostat. Dr. Morschhauser disclosed receiving honoraria from and serving on advisory boards for both companies. Dr. Witzig has disclosed grants for clinical trials from Novartis and Wyeth, and he has served on advisory boards for Cephalon, Novartis, and Wyeth.

LUGANO, SWITZERLAND – A combination of the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) ibrutinib (Imbruvica) and the pan-phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor buparlisib showed clinical activity superior to that of single-agent ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

In a phase I/IB dose escalation study and expansion cohort testing the combination in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma, and MCL, the overall response rate (ORR) among patients with MCL was 100%, consisting of complete responses (CR) in 8 of 11 patients, and partial responses (PR) in 3 patients, reported Connie Lee Batlevi, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

LUGANO, SWITZERLAND – A combination of the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) ibrutinib (Imbruvica) and the pan-phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor buparlisib showed clinical activity superior to that of single-agent ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

In a phase I/IB dose escalation study and expansion cohort testing the combination in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma, and MCL, the overall response rate (ORR) among patients with MCL was 100%, consisting of complete responses (CR) in 8 of 11 patients, and partial responses (PR) in 3 patients, reported Connie Lee Batlevi, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

LUGANO, SWITZERLAND – A combination of the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) ibrutinib (Imbruvica) and the pan-phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor buparlisib showed clinical activity superior to that of single-agent ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

In a phase I/IB dose escalation study and expansion cohort testing the combination in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma, and MCL, the overall response rate (ORR) among patients with MCL was 100%, consisting of complete responses (CR) in 8 of 11 patients, and partial responses (PR) in 3 patients, reported Connie Lee Batlevi, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

MADRID – For patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL), an extensive and diverse T-cell receptor repertoire may be predictive of response to blinatumomab (Blincyto), investigators suggest.

Patients with responses to blinatumomab had a significantly more diverse T-cell receptor–beta (TRB) gene repertoire at the time of screening, compared with patients who would go on to have minimal residual disease after starting on blinatumomab therapy, reported Michaela Kotrova, MD, from the 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University and University Hospital Motol in Prague, Czech Republic.

Nancy B. Baron/Frontline Medical News

MADRID – For patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL), an extensive and diverse T-cell receptor repertoire may be predictive of response to blinatumomab (Blincyto), investigators suggest.

Patients with responses to blinatumomab had a significantly more diverse T-cell receptor–beta (TRB) gene repertoire at the time of screening, compared with patients who would go on to have minimal residual disease after starting on blinatumomab therapy, reported Michaela Kotrova, MD, from the 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University and University Hospital Motol in Prague, Czech Republic.

Nancy B. Baron/Frontline Medical News

MADRID – For patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL), an extensive and diverse T-cell receptor repertoire may be predictive of response to blinatumomab (Blincyto), investigators suggest.

Patients with responses to blinatumomab had a significantly more diverse T-cell receptor–beta (TRB) gene repertoire at the time of screening, compared with patients who would go on to have minimal residual disease after starting on blinatumomab therapy, reported Michaela Kotrova, MD, from the 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University and University Hospital Motol in Prague, Czech Republic.

Nancy B. Baron/Frontline Medical News

LUGANO, SWITZERLAND – A novel combination of the anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab (Keytruda) and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab was associated with a high overall response rate (ORR) in patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma in a phase II clinical trial.

Among 20 patients evaluable for efficacy, the overall response rate to the combination was 65%, including 50% complete responses (CR) reported Loretta J. Nastoupil, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“Follicular lymphoma is probably one of the best examples of targeting the immune system and also one of the earliest examples. Over the last few years we’ve learned a great deal about the different mechanisms of not only negative impact on infiltrating T cells, but also immune escape and T-cell exhaustion,” she said at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma.

Although biopsies of follicular lymphoma tumors have demonstrated infiltration of anti-tumor T cells, these cells are typically impeded by immune checkpoints, including PD-1 and its ligand (PD-L1).

The use of anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab has been shown to enhance the function of antitumor T cells in follicular lymphoma, and blocking PD-1 on natural killer cells enhances the antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity of the natural killer cells, she said.

Because rituximab, a mainstay of therapy for non-Hodgkin lymphomas, induces antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, the investigators reasoned that combining it with pembrolizumab would simultaneously and synergistically stimulate activation of innate and adaptive immunity.

They designed a phase II, single-arm study in 30 patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma following one or more prior lines of therapy. The patients also had to have rituximab-sensitive disease, defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response lasting for at least 6 months following the most recent rituximab-containing therapy.

The patients were treated with rituximab 375 mg/m² IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 1, and pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 16 cycles starting on day 2 of cycle 1.

The investigators expected that the combination would improve ORR, the primary endpoint, to at least 60%, compared with 40% for historical controls treated with repeat courses of rituximab.

At the data cutoff for the interim analysis, 32 patients had been enrolled, 30 were evaluable for safety, and 20 for efficacy after a median follow-up of 8.2 months.

Among the 20 patients (median age 64) in the efficacy analysis, 10 (50%) had a CR, and 3 (15%) had a partial response, for an ORR of 65%. Three additional patients had stable disease, and four had disease progression as best responses.

Among the patients with CRs, the duration of response ranged from nearly 275 days to more than 600 days.

“This does appear to be durable, and it is time dependent in terms of response. We did see early response, and we also saw deepening of response over time,” Dr. Nastoupil said.

Four patients were discontinued from the study because of immune-related adverse events. All four patients had achieved a CR at the time of study removal, and all four have ongoing CRs.

Among the 30 patients evaluable for safety, there were no grade 4 adverse events, no deaths, and few grade 3 events. Most events were grade 1 or 2, and included fatigue, eye pain/blurred vision/watery eye, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea dyspnea, rash, cough, and lymphopenia.

The investigators also looked at potential biomarkers for response, including PD-L1 expression in tumors prior to treatment. They found in samples from three patients who went on to achieve CRs that PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was low, ranging from 0% to 8%, suggesting that PD-L1 expression may not be necessary to generate a response with the combination.

They then looked at the association between CD8-positive T effector cells and responses in 12 patients, and found that patients with higher levels of expression had better ORR and CR rates.

“These interim results warrant further investigation of this combination in follicular lymphoma, and an expansion to include patients with refractory follicular lymphoma is planned,” Dr. Nastoupil concluded.

The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society supported the study. Dr Nastoupil has disclosed consulting fees from Celgene and contracted research for Abbvie, Janssen, and TG Therapeutics.

LUGANO, SWITZERLAND – A novel combination of the anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab (Keytruda) and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab was associated with a high overall response rate (ORR) in patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma in a phase II clinical trial.

Among 20 patients evaluable for efficacy, the overall response rate to the combination was 65%, including 50% complete responses (CR) reported Loretta J. Nastoupil, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“Follicular lymphoma is probably one of the best examples of targeting the immune system and also one of the earliest examples. Over the last few years we’ve learned a great deal about the different mechanisms of not only negative impact on infiltrating T cells, but also immune escape and T-cell exhaustion,” she said at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma.

Although biopsies of follicular lymphoma tumors have demonstrated infiltration of anti-tumor T cells, these cells are typically impeded by immune checkpoints, including PD-1 and its ligand (PD-L1).

The use of anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab has been shown to enhance the function of antitumor T cells in follicular lymphoma, and blocking PD-1 on natural killer cells enhances the antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity of the natural killer cells, she said.

Because rituximab, a mainstay of therapy for non-Hodgkin lymphomas, induces antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, the investigators reasoned that combining it with pembrolizumab would simultaneously and synergistically stimulate activation of innate and adaptive immunity.

They designed a phase II, single-arm study in 30 patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma following one or more prior lines of therapy. The patients also had to have rituximab-sensitive disease, defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response lasting for at least 6 months following the most recent rituximab-containing therapy.

The patients were treated with rituximab 375 mg/m² IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 1, and pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 16 cycles starting on day 2 of cycle 1.

The investigators expected that the combination would improve ORR, the primary endpoint, to at least 60%, compared with 40% for historical controls treated with repeat courses of rituximab.

At the data cutoff for the interim analysis, 32 patients had been enrolled, 30 were evaluable for safety, and 20 for efficacy after a median follow-up of 8.2 months.

Among the 20 patients (median age 64) in the efficacy analysis, 10 (50%) had a CR, and 3 (15%) had a partial response, for an ORR of 65%. Three additional patients had stable disease, and four had disease progression as best responses.

Among the patients with CRs, the duration of response ranged from nearly 275 days to more than 600 days.

“This does appear to be durable, and it is time dependent in terms of response. We did see early response, and we also saw deepening of response over time,” Dr. Nastoupil said.

Four patients were discontinued from the study because of immune-related adverse events. All four patients had achieved a CR at the time of study removal, and all four have ongoing CRs.

Among the 30 patients evaluable for safety, there were no grade 4 adverse events, no deaths, and few grade 3 events. Most events were grade 1 or 2, and included fatigue, eye pain/blurred vision/watery eye, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea dyspnea, rash, cough, and lymphopenia.

The investigators also looked at potential biomarkers for response, including PD-L1 expression in tumors prior to treatment. They found in samples from three patients who went on to achieve CRs that PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was low, ranging from 0% to 8%, suggesting that PD-L1 expression may not be necessary to generate a response with the combination.

They then looked at the association between CD8-positive T effector cells and responses in 12 patients, and found that patients with higher levels of expression had better ORR and CR rates.

“These interim results warrant further investigation of this combination in follicular lymphoma, and an expansion to include patients with refractory follicular lymphoma is planned,” Dr. Nastoupil concluded.

The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society supported the study. Dr Nastoupil has disclosed consulting fees from Celgene and contracted research for Abbvie, Janssen, and TG Therapeutics.

LUGANO, SWITZERLAND – A novel combination of the anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab (Keytruda) and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab was associated with a high overall response rate (ORR) in patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma in a phase II clinical trial.

Among 20 patients evaluable for efficacy, the overall response rate to the combination was 65%, including 50% complete responses (CR) reported Loretta J. Nastoupil, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“Follicular lymphoma is probably one of the best examples of targeting the immune system and also one of the earliest examples. Over the last few years we’ve learned a great deal about the different mechanisms of not only negative impact on infiltrating T cells, but also immune escape and T-cell exhaustion,” she said at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma.

Although biopsies of follicular lymphoma tumors have demonstrated infiltration of anti-tumor T cells, these cells are typically impeded by immune checkpoints, including PD-1 and its ligand (PD-L1).

The use of anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab has been shown to enhance the function of antitumor T cells in follicular lymphoma, and blocking PD-1 on natural killer cells enhances the antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity of the natural killer cells, she said.

Because rituximab, a mainstay of therapy for non-Hodgkin lymphomas, induces antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, the investigators reasoned that combining it with pembrolizumab would simultaneously and synergistically stimulate activation of innate and adaptive immunity.

They designed a phase II, single-arm study in 30 patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma following one or more prior lines of therapy. The patients also had to have rituximab-sensitive disease, defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response lasting for at least 6 months following the most recent rituximab-containing therapy.

The patients were treated with rituximab 375 mg/m² IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 1, and pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 16 cycles starting on day 2 of cycle 1.

The investigators expected that the combination would improve ORR, the primary endpoint, to at least 60%, compared with 40% for historical controls treated with repeat courses of rituximab.

At the data cutoff for the interim analysis, 32 patients had been enrolled, 30 were evaluable for safety, and 20 for efficacy after a median follow-up of 8.2 months.

Among the 20 patients (median age 64) in the efficacy analysis, 10 (50%) had a CR, and 3 (15%) had a partial response, for an ORR of 65%. Three additional patients had stable disease, and four had disease progression as best responses.

Among the patients with CRs, the duration of response ranged from nearly 275 days to more than 600 days.

“This does appear to be durable, and it is time dependent in terms of response. We did see early response, and we also saw deepening of response over time,” Dr. Nastoupil said.

Four patients were discontinued from the study because of immune-related adverse events. All four patients had achieved a CR at the time of study removal, and all four have ongoing CRs.

Among the 30 patients evaluable for safety, there were no grade 4 adverse events, no deaths, and few grade 3 events. Most events were grade 1 or 2, and included fatigue, eye pain/blurred vision/watery eye, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea dyspnea, rash, cough, and lymphopenia.

The investigators also looked at potential biomarkers for response, including PD-L1 expression in tumors prior to treatment. They found in samples from three patients who went on to achieve CRs that PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was low, ranging from 0% to 8%, suggesting that PD-L1 expression may not be necessary to generate a response with the combination.

They then looked at the association between CD8-positive T effector cells and responses in 12 patients, and found that patients with higher levels of expression had better ORR and CR rates.

“These interim results warrant further investigation of this combination in follicular lymphoma, and an expansion to include patients with refractory follicular lymphoma is planned,” Dr. Nastoupil concluded.

The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society supported the study. Dr Nastoupil has disclosed consulting fees from Celgene and contracted research for Abbvie, Janssen, and TG Therapeutics.

MADRID – Two chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) constructs are showing promising activity against treatment-refractory, aggressive forms of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in multicenter clinical trials.

In the ZUMA-1 trial, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 CAR-T product, was associated with an 82% objective response rate (ORR), including 54% complete responses, in patients with refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), or transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL), reported Yi Lin, MD, PhD, from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester Minnesota.

Nancy Baron/Frontline Medical News

ZUMA-1

Dr. Lin reported phase II results from ZUMA-1, investigating axi-cel at a target dose of 2 x 10⁶ cells per kilogram in 72 patients with refractory DLBCL (cohort 1), and 20 patients with refractory PMBCL or TFL (cohort 2).

The median patient age was 58 years. Patients had stage III or IV disease, 47% had International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores of 3-4, 77% had disease that was refractory to second-line therapies or beyond, and 21% had disease that relapsed within 12 months of an autologous bone marrow transplant

The axi-cel construct was successfully manufactured in 99% of patients, with an average turnaround time from apheresis to the clinical site of 17 days.

As noted before, the trial met its primary endpoint with an 82% ORR, consisting of 54% complete responses and 28% partial responses.

The median duration of response was 8.2 months, and for patients with complete responses the median duration has not been reached.

Median overall survival has also not been reached.

The treatment was generally safe, with only 13% of patients experiencing grade 3 or greater cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and 28% having grade 3 or greater neurologic events. The events were generally reversible, and the rates of each declined over time. The use of tociluzumab or steroids to control adverse events did not have a negative effect on responses, Dr. Lin said.

JULIET

In the ongoing JULIET study, patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL after at least two prior lines of therapy and who are not candidates for stem cell transplants are enrolled.

Nancy Baron/Frontline Medical News

MADRID – Two chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) constructs are showing promising activity against treatment-refractory, aggressive forms of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in multicenter clinical trials.

In the ZUMA-1 trial, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 CAR-T product, was associated with an 82% objective response rate (ORR), including 54% complete responses, in patients with refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), or transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL), reported Yi Lin, MD, PhD, from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester Minnesota.

Nancy Baron/Frontline Medical News

ZUMA-1

Dr. Lin reported phase II results from ZUMA-1, investigating axi-cel at a target dose of 2 x 10⁶ cells per kilogram in 72 patients with refractory DLBCL (cohort 1), and 20 patients with refractory PMBCL or TFL (cohort 2).

The median patient age was 58 years. Patients had stage III or IV disease, 47% had International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores of 3-4, 77% had disease that was refractory to second-line therapies or beyond, and 21% had disease that relapsed within 12 months of an autologous bone marrow transplant

The axi-cel construct was successfully manufactured in 99% of patients, with an average turnaround time from apheresis to the clinical site of 17 days.

As noted before, the trial met its primary endpoint with an 82% ORR, consisting of 54% complete responses and 28% partial responses.

The median duration of response was 8.2 months, and for patients with complete responses the median duration has not been reached.

Median overall survival has also not been reached.

The treatment was generally safe, with only 13% of patients experiencing grade 3 or greater cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and 28% having grade 3 or greater neurologic events. The events were generally reversible, and the rates of each declined over time. The use of tociluzumab or steroids to control adverse events did not have a negative effect on responses, Dr. Lin said.

JULIET

In the ongoing JULIET study, patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL after at least two prior lines of therapy and who are not candidates for stem cell transplants are enrolled.

Nancy Baron/Frontline Medical News

MADRID – Two chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) constructs are showing promising activity against treatment-refractory, aggressive forms of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in multicenter clinical trials.

In the ZUMA-1 trial, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 CAR-T product, was associated with an 82% objective response rate (ORR), including 54% complete responses, in patients with refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), or transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL), reported Yi Lin, MD, PhD, from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester Minnesota.

Nancy Baron/Frontline Medical News

ZUMA-1

Dr. Lin reported phase II results from ZUMA-1, investigating axi-cel at a target dose of 2 x 10⁶ cells per kilogram in 72 patients with refractory DLBCL (cohort 1), and 20 patients with refractory PMBCL or TFL (cohort 2).

The median patient age was 58 years. Patients had stage III or IV disease, 47% had International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores of 3-4, 77% had disease that was refractory to second-line therapies or beyond, and 21% had disease that relapsed within 12 months of an autologous bone marrow transplant

The axi-cel construct was successfully manufactured in 99% of patients, with an average turnaround time from apheresis to the clinical site of 17 days.

As noted before, the trial met its primary endpoint with an 82% ORR, consisting of 54% complete responses and 28% partial responses.

The median duration of response was 8.2 months, and for patients with complete responses the median duration has not been reached.

Median overall survival has also not been reached.

The treatment was generally safe, with only 13% of patients experiencing grade 3 or greater cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and 28% having grade 3 or greater neurologic events. The events were generally reversible, and the rates of each declined over time. The use of tociluzumab or steroids to control adverse events did not have a negative effect on responses, Dr. Lin said.

JULIET

In the ongoing JULIET study, patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL after at least two prior lines of therapy and who are not candidates for stem cell transplants are enrolled.

Nancy Baron/Frontline Medical News