User login
Beware “The Great Mimicker” that can lurk in the vulva
LAS VEGAS – Officially a type of precancerous lesion is known as vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN); unofficially, an obstetrician-gynecologist calls it something else: “The Great Mimicker.” That’s because symptoms of VIN can fool physicians into thinking they’re seeing other vulvar conditions. The good news: A biopsy can offer crucial insight and should be performed on any dysplastic or unusual lesion on the vulva.
Amanda Nickles Fader, MD, of Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, offered this advice and other tips about this type of precancerous vulvar lesion in a presentation at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.
According to Dr. Nickles Fader, vulvar cancer accounts for 5% of all gynecologic malignancies, and it appears most in women aged 65-75 years. However, about 15% of all vulvar cancers appear in women under the age of 40 years. “We’re seeing a greater number of premenopausal women with this condition, probably due to HPV [human papillomavirus],” she said, adding that HPV vaccines are crucial to prevention.
The VIN form of precancerous lesion is most common in premenopausal women (75%) and – like vulvar cancer – is linked to HPV infection, HIV infection, cigarette smoking, and weakened or suppressed immune systems, Dr. Nickles Faber said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.
VIN presents with symptoms such as pruritus, altered vulvar appearance at the site of the lesion, palpable abnormality, and perineal pain or burning. About 40% of cases do not show symptoms and are diagnosed by gynecologists at annual visits.
It’s important to biopsy these lesions, she said, because they can mimic other conditions such as vulvar cancer, condyloma acuminatum (genital warts), lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, and condyloma latum (a lesion linked to syphilis).
“Biopsy, biopsy, biopsy,” she urged.
In fact, one form of VIN – differentiated VIN – is associated with dermatologic conditions such as lichen sclerosus, and treatment of these conditions can prevent development of this VIN type.
As for treatment, Dr. Nickles Faber said surgery is the mainstay. About 90% of the time, wide local excision is the “go-to” approach, although the skinning vulvectomy procedure may be appropriate in lesions that are more extensive or multifocal and confluent. “It’s a lot more disfiguring.”
Laser ablation is a “very reasonable” option when cancer has been eliminated as a possibility, she said. It may be appropriate in multifocal or extensive lesions and can have important cosmetic advantages when excision would be inappropriate.
Off-label use of imiquimod 5%, a topical immune response modifier, can be appropriate in multifocal high-grade VINs, but it’s crucial to exclude invasive squamous cell carcinoma. As she noted, imiquimod is Food and Drug Administration–approved for anogenital warts but not for VIN. Beware of toxicity over the long term.
Dr. Nickles Fader reported no relevant financial disclosures.
LAS VEGAS – Officially a type of precancerous lesion is known as vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN); unofficially, an obstetrician-gynecologist calls it something else: “The Great Mimicker.” That’s because symptoms of VIN can fool physicians into thinking they’re seeing other vulvar conditions. The good news: A biopsy can offer crucial insight and should be performed on any dysplastic or unusual lesion on the vulva.
Amanda Nickles Fader, MD, of Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, offered this advice and other tips about this type of precancerous vulvar lesion in a presentation at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.
According to Dr. Nickles Fader, vulvar cancer accounts for 5% of all gynecologic malignancies, and it appears most in women aged 65-75 years. However, about 15% of all vulvar cancers appear in women under the age of 40 years. “We’re seeing a greater number of premenopausal women with this condition, probably due to HPV [human papillomavirus],” she said, adding that HPV vaccines are crucial to prevention.
The VIN form of precancerous lesion is most common in premenopausal women (75%) and – like vulvar cancer – is linked to HPV infection, HIV infection, cigarette smoking, and weakened or suppressed immune systems, Dr. Nickles Faber said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.
VIN presents with symptoms such as pruritus, altered vulvar appearance at the site of the lesion, palpable abnormality, and perineal pain or burning. About 40% of cases do not show symptoms and are diagnosed by gynecologists at annual visits.
It’s important to biopsy these lesions, she said, because they can mimic other conditions such as vulvar cancer, condyloma acuminatum (genital warts), lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, and condyloma latum (a lesion linked to syphilis).
“Biopsy, biopsy, biopsy,” she urged.
In fact, one form of VIN – differentiated VIN – is associated with dermatologic conditions such as lichen sclerosus, and treatment of these conditions can prevent development of this VIN type.
As for treatment, Dr. Nickles Faber said surgery is the mainstay. About 90% of the time, wide local excision is the “go-to” approach, although the skinning vulvectomy procedure may be appropriate in lesions that are more extensive or multifocal and confluent. “It’s a lot more disfiguring.”
Laser ablation is a “very reasonable” option when cancer has been eliminated as a possibility, she said. It may be appropriate in multifocal or extensive lesions and can have important cosmetic advantages when excision would be inappropriate.
Off-label use of imiquimod 5%, a topical immune response modifier, can be appropriate in multifocal high-grade VINs, but it’s crucial to exclude invasive squamous cell carcinoma. As she noted, imiquimod is Food and Drug Administration–approved for anogenital warts but not for VIN. Beware of toxicity over the long term.
Dr. Nickles Fader reported no relevant financial disclosures.
LAS VEGAS – Officially a type of precancerous lesion is known as vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN); unofficially, an obstetrician-gynecologist calls it something else: “The Great Mimicker.” That’s because symptoms of VIN can fool physicians into thinking they’re seeing other vulvar conditions. The good news: A biopsy can offer crucial insight and should be performed on any dysplastic or unusual lesion on the vulva.
Amanda Nickles Fader, MD, of Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, offered this advice and other tips about this type of precancerous vulvar lesion in a presentation at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.
According to Dr. Nickles Fader, vulvar cancer accounts for 5% of all gynecologic malignancies, and it appears most in women aged 65-75 years. However, about 15% of all vulvar cancers appear in women under the age of 40 years. “We’re seeing a greater number of premenopausal women with this condition, probably due to HPV [human papillomavirus],” she said, adding that HPV vaccines are crucial to prevention.
The VIN form of precancerous lesion is most common in premenopausal women (75%) and – like vulvar cancer – is linked to HPV infection, HIV infection, cigarette smoking, and weakened or suppressed immune systems, Dr. Nickles Faber said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.
VIN presents with symptoms such as pruritus, altered vulvar appearance at the site of the lesion, palpable abnormality, and perineal pain or burning. About 40% of cases do not show symptoms and are diagnosed by gynecologists at annual visits.
It’s important to biopsy these lesions, she said, because they can mimic other conditions such as vulvar cancer, condyloma acuminatum (genital warts), lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, and condyloma latum (a lesion linked to syphilis).
“Biopsy, biopsy, biopsy,” she urged.
In fact, one form of VIN – differentiated VIN – is associated with dermatologic conditions such as lichen sclerosus, and treatment of these conditions can prevent development of this VIN type.
As for treatment, Dr. Nickles Faber said surgery is the mainstay. About 90% of the time, wide local excision is the “go-to” approach, although the skinning vulvectomy procedure may be appropriate in lesions that are more extensive or multifocal and confluent. “It’s a lot more disfiguring.”
Laser ablation is a “very reasonable” option when cancer has been eliminated as a possibility, she said. It may be appropriate in multifocal or extensive lesions and can have important cosmetic advantages when excision would be inappropriate.
Off-label use of imiquimod 5%, a topical immune response modifier, can be appropriate in multifocal high-grade VINs, but it’s crucial to exclude invasive squamous cell carcinoma. As she noted, imiquimod is Food and Drug Administration–approved for anogenital warts but not for VIN. Beware of toxicity over the long term.
Dr. Nickles Fader reported no relevant financial disclosures.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM PAGS
New diabetes guidelines downgrade insulin as first-line injectable treatment
The American Diabetes Association is out with new standard-of-care guidelines that – among other things – reject injectable insulin as the main first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), debut a cardiac risk calculator, and offer new recommendations regarding medications for patients with kidney disease, clogged arteries, and heart failure.
The ADA’s newly released 2019 Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes “emphasize a patient-centered approach that considers the multiple health and life factors of each person living with diabetes,” said William T. Cefalu, MD, the ADA’s chief scientific, medical, and mission officer, in a statement.
The 193-page guidelines are now available online at the Diabetes Care website and will be available via an app and the print edition of the journal.
Here’s a closer look at a few of the many new and revised recommendations in the 2019 Standards of Care.
Diabetes treatment
In a new guideline, the standards of care says glucagonlike peptide–1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists should be “a first-line treatment” – ahead of insulin – “for most [type 2] patients who need the greater efficacy of an injectable medication.”
However, the recommendations note that the “high costs and tolerability issues are important barriers to the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists.”
A new recommendation suggests the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists “with demonstrated cardiovascular disease benefit” in patients with type 2 diabetes who have confirmed atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
A related new recommendation says sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors are the preferred treatment for these patients who have heart failure or are at high risk of developing it.
In a new recommendation, the ADA suggests that patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease potentially take a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor or a GLP-1 receptor agonist, which has been shown to reduce the risk of chronic kidney disease progression, cardiac events, or both.
There’s a greater focus on insulin as the preferred treatment for hyperglycemia in gestational diabetes mellitus “as it does not cross the placenta to a measurable extent.” The ADA also warns against metformin and glyburide as first-line agents because they “both cross the placenta to the fetus.”
Diabetes monitoring and screening
The ADA now recommends use of the American College of Cardiology’s atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk calculator, the ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus. The calculator assesses the risk of this disease over 10 years and is “generally a useful tool.”
The ACA recommends screening for cardiac risk factors at least once a year in patients with diabetes.
Physicians are no longer advised to check the feet of patients with diabetes at every visit; now the recommendation is for those at high risk of ulceration only. However, an annual examination of feet is recommended for all patients with diabetes.
The ADA now recommends that patients with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes undergo screening for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis if they have elevated liver enzymes or an ultrasound examination shows signs of fatty liver.
Gabapentin is now listed along with pregabalin and duloxetine as first-line drug treatments for neuropathic pain in diabetes.
The American Diabetes Association is out with new standard-of-care guidelines that – among other things – reject injectable insulin as the main first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), debut a cardiac risk calculator, and offer new recommendations regarding medications for patients with kidney disease, clogged arteries, and heart failure.
The ADA’s newly released 2019 Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes “emphasize a patient-centered approach that considers the multiple health and life factors of each person living with diabetes,” said William T. Cefalu, MD, the ADA’s chief scientific, medical, and mission officer, in a statement.
The 193-page guidelines are now available online at the Diabetes Care website and will be available via an app and the print edition of the journal.
Here’s a closer look at a few of the many new and revised recommendations in the 2019 Standards of Care.
Diabetes treatment
In a new guideline, the standards of care says glucagonlike peptide–1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists should be “a first-line treatment” – ahead of insulin – “for most [type 2] patients who need the greater efficacy of an injectable medication.”
However, the recommendations note that the “high costs and tolerability issues are important barriers to the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists.”
A new recommendation suggests the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists “with demonstrated cardiovascular disease benefit” in patients with type 2 diabetes who have confirmed atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
A related new recommendation says sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors are the preferred treatment for these patients who have heart failure or are at high risk of developing it.
In a new recommendation, the ADA suggests that patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease potentially take a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor or a GLP-1 receptor agonist, which has been shown to reduce the risk of chronic kidney disease progression, cardiac events, or both.
There’s a greater focus on insulin as the preferred treatment for hyperglycemia in gestational diabetes mellitus “as it does not cross the placenta to a measurable extent.” The ADA also warns against metformin and glyburide as first-line agents because they “both cross the placenta to the fetus.”
Diabetes monitoring and screening
The ADA now recommends use of the American College of Cardiology’s atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk calculator, the ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus. The calculator assesses the risk of this disease over 10 years and is “generally a useful tool.”
The ACA recommends screening for cardiac risk factors at least once a year in patients with diabetes.
Physicians are no longer advised to check the feet of patients with diabetes at every visit; now the recommendation is for those at high risk of ulceration only. However, an annual examination of feet is recommended for all patients with diabetes.
The ADA now recommends that patients with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes undergo screening for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis if they have elevated liver enzymes or an ultrasound examination shows signs of fatty liver.
Gabapentin is now listed along with pregabalin and duloxetine as first-line drug treatments for neuropathic pain in diabetes.
The American Diabetes Association is out with new standard-of-care guidelines that – among other things – reject injectable insulin as the main first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), debut a cardiac risk calculator, and offer new recommendations regarding medications for patients with kidney disease, clogged arteries, and heart failure.
The ADA’s newly released 2019 Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes “emphasize a patient-centered approach that considers the multiple health and life factors of each person living with diabetes,” said William T. Cefalu, MD, the ADA’s chief scientific, medical, and mission officer, in a statement.
The 193-page guidelines are now available online at the Diabetes Care website and will be available via an app and the print edition of the journal.
Here’s a closer look at a few of the many new and revised recommendations in the 2019 Standards of Care.
Diabetes treatment
In a new guideline, the standards of care says glucagonlike peptide–1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists should be “a first-line treatment” – ahead of insulin – “for most [type 2] patients who need the greater efficacy of an injectable medication.”
However, the recommendations note that the “high costs and tolerability issues are important barriers to the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists.”
A new recommendation suggests the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists “with demonstrated cardiovascular disease benefit” in patients with type 2 diabetes who have confirmed atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
A related new recommendation says sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors are the preferred treatment for these patients who have heart failure or are at high risk of developing it.
In a new recommendation, the ADA suggests that patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease potentially take a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor or a GLP-1 receptor agonist, which has been shown to reduce the risk of chronic kidney disease progression, cardiac events, or both.
There’s a greater focus on insulin as the preferred treatment for hyperglycemia in gestational diabetes mellitus “as it does not cross the placenta to a measurable extent.” The ADA also warns against metformin and glyburide as first-line agents because they “both cross the placenta to the fetus.”
Diabetes monitoring and screening
The ADA now recommends use of the American College of Cardiology’s atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk calculator, the ASCVD Risk Estimator Plus. The calculator assesses the risk of this disease over 10 years and is “generally a useful tool.”
The ACA recommends screening for cardiac risk factors at least once a year in patients with diabetes.
Physicians are no longer advised to check the feet of patients with diabetes at every visit; now the recommendation is for those at high risk of ulceration only. However, an annual examination of feet is recommended for all patients with diabetes.
The ADA now recommends that patients with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes undergo screening for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis if they have elevated liver enzymes or an ultrasound examination shows signs of fatty liver.
Gabapentin is now listed along with pregabalin and duloxetine as first-line drug treatments for neuropathic pain in diabetes.
FROM DIABETES CARE
Wasp-stung lung bugs, fat clay, Botoxed Vulcans, and ‘GOT’ mortality risk
The wonderful world of wasps
Never thought you’d be thankful for wasps, did you? Neither did we. Using mice as test subjects, scientists at MIT found that a tiny peptide in the venom was able to completely eliminate Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which causes respiratory infections and is often resistant to antibiotics. Now if you’re sick, all you have to do is go outside and get stung by a bunch of wasps!
Wait, no, that’s not right. The researchers at MIT engineered a molecule that can be used to create an antibiotic that’s safe for humans. While most insect venom is chock full of compounds that are toxic to humans, the scientists were able to transform their tiny peptide into a bacteria-defeating machine. This is a big victory in the war against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Go, wasps!
Live long and Botox
Talk about highly illogical! Botox patients sometimes return for follow-up visits with dermatologist Kelly Stankiewicz, MD, and haven’t noticed they’ve “Spocked,” even though it may be obvious to just about everyone else.
But other Botox patients are most certainly aware that their eyebrows have arched up on the right and left sides – just like those of a certain Vulcan character on “Star Trek.” And they want to be beamed out of that uncomfortable situation pronto.
Dr. Stankiewicz, who works in Park City, Utah, explained the “Spocking” phenomenon in a presentation about facial treatments at the recent Las Vegas Dermatology Symposium. Spocking can occur in patents who get Botox treatment to eliminate the “11 line” – two vertical wrinkles – between the eyebrows, Dr. Stankiewicz said. It occurs “when the middle of the forehead doesn’t move but the outside does,” she said, causing an unsightly outwardly arched eyebrow look.
The solution to Spocking is easy, she said: “Put a tiny bit of Botox in the forehead muscle right where the eyebrow is peaking the most.”
Leonard Nimoy, the original Mr. Spock, is not available for comment, given that he died in 2015. But Dr. Stankiewicz does have a perspective on Mr. Spock’s trademark look: “It’s like the people who drew his brow knew that Botox was on the horizon.”
Add the dirt, lose the fat
Lots of things are supposed to be stronger than dirt, but it looks like obesity might not be one of them. Investigators who were trying to improve drug delivery using a type of clay – spray-dried smectite clay particles, to be exact – discovered that it has “a unique ability to ‘soak up’ fat droplets in the gut,” according to a statement from the University of South Australia, Adelaide.
“Not only were the clay materials trapping the fats within their particle structure, but they were also preventing them from being absorbed by the body, ensuring that fat simply passed through the digestive system,” researcher Tahnee J. Dening said.
In the study, the smectite outperformed the weight-loss drug orlistat in rats fed a high-fat diet for 2 weeks (Pharm Res. 2019;36:21 doi: 10.1007/s11095-018-2552-9). Even better, smectite is already widely used in foods and nutraceuticals and is considered to be safe. Even even better, smectite is a really fun word to say. And with the prevalence of obesity such as it is, we’re sure that physicians will prescribe smectite just so they can say “smectite” to their patients. Smectite.
When you play the game of thrones …
… You conduct an evidence-based analysis of mortality across the Seven Kingdoms. In celebration of the approaching final season, two researchers published a study of mortality and survival in HBO’s “Game of Thrones” series. They examined data on sociodemographic factors and circumstances of death to identify predictors of mortality.
After looking at 330 characters from the show (186 who suffered death), the authors determined that being male, lowborn, and loyal had the highest correlation with mortality. Poor men who never switched their allegiance from one side to the other had the lowest chance of survival. In addition, the probability of dying in the first hour after appearing on screen was 14%. Not a good statistic if you’re trying to become famous in Westeros. And a mortality risk rivaling even that of Mr. Spock’s red-shirted shipmates down in engineering.
Nurse, sand wedge, STAT!
There really is no sport like golf. The wide green spaces, the fresh air, the thrill of launching a 300-yard drive down the fairway, the fun of double-bogeying the last three holes to shoot yet another 93; golf is a noble pursuit, indeed. And a sport everyone knows doctors love. Right?
In research published in the Christmas edition of the BMJ, a group of doctors from Massachusetts sought to find out just how accurate the stereotype was. Their answer? Doctors really do enjoy teeing it up.
Well, male doctors.
Well, old male doctors.
Using a database of about a million physicians, the researchers found that 5.5% of male physicians and 1.3% of female physicians – or 4.1% overall – maintained an official United States Golf Association handicap. Male physicians aged 61-70 years were most likely to play, and female physicians aged 31-35 years were least likely.
However, while golf is certainly a common pastime among doctors, they aren’t exactly very good at it, as the average doctor is actually slightly worse than the average nondoctor. Surgeons presented a notable exception, possessing significantly lower handicaps than their colleagues while, perhaps not coincidentally, also playing more often. We’re sure there’s a joke about overpaid surgeons in narrow specialties having too much time on their hands, and we’ll get right back to you with it after our 12 o’clock tee time.
The wonderful world of wasps
Never thought you’d be thankful for wasps, did you? Neither did we. Using mice as test subjects, scientists at MIT found that a tiny peptide in the venom was able to completely eliminate Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which causes respiratory infections and is often resistant to antibiotics. Now if you’re sick, all you have to do is go outside and get stung by a bunch of wasps!
Wait, no, that’s not right. The researchers at MIT engineered a molecule that can be used to create an antibiotic that’s safe for humans. While most insect venom is chock full of compounds that are toxic to humans, the scientists were able to transform their tiny peptide into a bacteria-defeating machine. This is a big victory in the war against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Go, wasps!
Live long and Botox
Talk about highly illogical! Botox patients sometimes return for follow-up visits with dermatologist Kelly Stankiewicz, MD, and haven’t noticed they’ve “Spocked,” even though it may be obvious to just about everyone else.
But other Botox patients are most certainly aware that their eyebrows have arched up on the right and left sides – just like those of a certain Vulcan character on “Star Trek.” And they want to be beamed out of that uncomfortable situation pronto.
Dr. Stankiewicz, who works in Park City, Utah, explained the “Spocking” phenomenon in a presentation about facial treatments at the recent Las Vegas Dermatology Symposium. Spocking can occur in patents who get Botox treatment to eliminate the “11 line” – two vertical wrinkles – between the eyebrows, Dr. Stankiewicz said. It occurs “when the middle of the forehead doesn’t move but the outside does,” she said, causing an unsightly outwardly arched eyebrow look.
The solution to Spocking is easy, she said: “Put a tiny bit of Botox in the forehead muscle right where the eyebrow is peaking the most.”
Leonard Nimoy, the original Mr. Spock, is not available for comment, given that he died in 2015. But Dr. Stankiewicz does have a perspective on Mr. Spock’s trademark look: “It’s like the people who drew his brow knew that Botox was on the horizon.”
Add the dirt, lose the fat
Lots of things are supposed to be stronger than dirt, but it looks like obesity might not be one of them. Investigators who were trying to improve drug delivery using a type of clay – spray-dried smectite clay particles, to be exact – discovered that it has “a unique ability to ‘soak up’ fat droplets in the gut,” according to a statement from the University of South Australia, Adelaide.
“Not only were the clay materials trapping the fats within their particle structure, but they were also preventing them from being absorbed by the body, ensuring that fat simply passed through the digestive system,” researcher Tahnee J. Dening said.
In the study, the smectite outperformed the weight-loss drug orlistat in rats fed a high-fat diet for 2 weeks (Pharm Res. 2019;36:21 doi: 10.1007/s11095-018-2552-9). Even better, smectite is already widely used in foods and nutraceuticals and is considered to be safe. Even even better, smectite is a really fun word to say. And with the prevalence of obesity such as it is, we’re sure that physicians will prescribe smectite just so they can say “smectite” to their patients. Smectite.
When you play the game of thrones …
… You conduct an evidence-based analysis of mortality across the Seven Kingdoms. In celebration of the approaching final season, two researchers published a study of mortality and survival in HBO’s “Game of Thrones” series. They examined data on sociodemographic factors and circumstances of death to identify predictors of mortality.
After looking at 330 characters from the show (186 who suffered death), the authors determined that being male, lowborn, and loyal had the highest correlation with mortality. Poor men who never switched their allegiance from one side to the other had the lowest chance of survival. In addition, the probability of dying in the first hour after appearing on screen was 14%. Not a good statistic if you’re trying to become famous in Westeros. And a mortality risk rivaling even that of Mr. Spock’s red-shirted shipmates down in engineering.
Nurse, sand wedge, STAT!
There really is no sport like golf. The wide green spaces, the fresh air, the thrill of launching a 300-yard drive down the fairway, the fun of double-bogeying the last three holes to shoot yet another 93; golf is a noble pursuit, indeed. And a sport everyone knows doctors love. Right?
In research published in the Christmas edition of the BMJ, a group of doctors from Massachusetts sought to find out just how accurate the stereotype was. Their answer? Doctors really do enjoy teeing it up.
Well, male doctors.
Well, old male doctors.
Using a database of about a million physicians, the researchers found that 5.5% of male physicians and 1.3% of female physicians – or 4.1% overall – maintained an official United States Golf Association handicap. Male physicians aged 61-70 years were most likely to play, and female physicians aged 31-35 years were least likely.
However, while golf is certainly a common pastime among doctors, they aren’t exactly very good at it, as the average doctor is actually slightly worse than the average nondoctor. Surgeons presented a notable exception, possessing significantly lower handicaps than their colleagues while, perhaps not coincidentally, also playing more often. We’re sure there’s a joke about overpaid surgeons in narrow specialties having too much time on their hands, and we’ll get right back to you with it after our 12 o’clock tee time.
The wonderful world of wasps
Never thought you’d be thankful for wasps, did you? Neither did we. Using mice as test subjects, scientists at MIT found that a tiny peptide in the venom was able to completely eliminate Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which causes respiratory infections and is often resistant to antibiotics. Now if you’re sick, all you have to do is go outside and get stung by a bunch of wasps!
Wait, no, that’s not right. The researchers at MIT engineered a molecule that can be used to create an antibiotic that’s safe for humans. While most insect venom is chock full of compounds that are toxic to humans, the scientists were able to transform their tiny peptide into a bacteria-defeating machine. This is a big victory in the war against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Go, wasps!
Live long and Botox
Talk about highly illogical! Botox patients sometimes return for follow-up visits with dermatologist Kelly Stankiewicz, MD, and haven’t noticed they’ve “Spocked,” even though it may be obvious to just about everyone else.
But other Botox patients are most certainly aware that their eyebrows have arched up on the right and left sides – just like those of a certain Vulcan character on “Star Trek.” And they want to be beamed out of that uncomfortable situation pronto.
Dr. Stankiewicz, who works in Park City, Utah, explained the “Spocking” phenomenon in a presentation about facial treatments at the recent Las Vegas Dermatology Symposium. Spocking can occur in patents who get Botox treatment to eliminate the “11 line” – two vertical wrinkles – between the eyebrows, Dr. Stankiewicz said. It occurs “when the middle of the forehead doesn’t move but the outside does,” she said, causing an unsightly outwardly arched eyebrow look.
The solution to Spocking is easy, she said: “Put a tiny bit of Botox in the forehead muscle right where the eyebrow is peaking the most.”
Leonard Nimoy, the original Mr. Spock, is not available for comment, given that he died in 2015. But Dr. Stankiewicz does have a perspective on Mr. Spock’s trademark look: “It’s like the people who drew his brow knew that Botox was on the horizon.”
Add the dirt, lose the fat
Lots of things are supposed to be stronger than dirt, but it looks like obesity might not be one of them. Investigators who were trying to improve drug delivery using a type of clay – spray-dried smectite clay particles, to be exact – discovered that it has “a unique ability to ‘soak up’ fat droplets in the gut,” according to a statement from the University of South Australia, Adelaide.
“Not only were the clay materials trapping the fats within their particle structure, but they were also preventing them from being absorbed by the body, ensuring that fat simply passed through the digestive system,” researcher Tahnee J. Dening said.
In the study, the smectite outperformed the weight-loss drug orlistat in rats fed a high-fat diet for 2 weeks (Pharm Res. 2019;36:21 doi: 10.1007/s11095-018-2552-9). Even better, smectite is already widely used in foods and nutraceuticals and is considered to be safe. Even even better, smectite is a really fun word to say. And with the prevalence of obesity such as it is, we’re sure that physicians will prescribe smectite just so they can say “smectite” to their patients. Smectite.
When you play the game of thrones …
… You conduct an evidence-based analysis of mortality across the Seven Kingdoms. In celebration of the approaching final season, two researchers published a study of mortality and survival in HBO’s “Game of Thrones” series. They examined data on sociodemographic factors and circumstances of death to identify predictors of mortality.
After looking at 330 characters from the show (186 who suffered death), the authors determined that being male, lowborn, and loyal had the highest correlation with mortality. Poor men who never switched their allegiance from one side to the other had the lowest chance of survival. In addition, the probability of dying in the first hour after appearing on screen was 14%. Not a good statistic if you’re trying to become famous in Westeros. And a mortality risk rivaling even that of Mr. Spock’s red-shirted shipmates down in engineering.
Nurse, sand wedge, STAT!
There really is no sport like golf. The wide green spaces, the fresh air, the thrill of launching a 300-yard drive down the fairway, the fun of double-bogeying the last three holes to shoot yet another 93; golf is a noble pursuit, indeed. And a sport everyone knows doctors love. Right?
In research published in the Christmas edition of the BMJ, a group of doctors from Massachusetts sought to find out just how accurate the stereotype was. Their answer? Doctors really do enjoy teeing it up.
Well, male doctors.
Well, old male doctors.
Using a database of about a million physicians, the researchers found that 5.5% of male physicians and 1.3% of female physicians – or 4.1% overall – maintained an official United States Golf Association handicap. Male physicians aged 61-70 years were most likely to play, and female physicians aged 31-35 years were least likely.
However, while golf is certainly a common pastime among doctors, they aren’t exactly very good at it, as the average doctor is actually slightly worse than the average nondoctor. Surgeons presented a notable exception, possessing significantly lower handicaps than their colleagues while, perhaps not coincidentally, also playing more often. We’re sure there’s a joke about overpaid surgeons in narrow specialties having too much time on their hands, and we’ll get right back to you with it after our 12 o’clock tee time.
NCI director: Data failures cost lives
SAN DIEGO – A couple years ago, hematologist-oncologist Norman E. “Ned” Sharpless, MD, was gobsmacked by a groundbreaking study into treatments for acute myeloid leukemia. While the findings offered valuable new insight into the best drug options, they left Dr. Sharpless quaking, and not with delight. “I can recall that my knees buckled,” he said. 
Why? Because the findings, he told colleagues at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, came too late for many patients to benefit. “One could say that’s great news, this is medical progress,” he said. “But I saw this as a clear failure of data aggregation.”
Now, Dr. Sharpless is in a position to do more than fume and speak out. He became the director of the National Cancer Institute in 2017 and he’s made “big data” one of his four priorities for the NCI under his leadership.
“While data security is crucial, there are also costs to not aggregating data and sharing it,” he said. “It means giving patients the wrong drug, it means patients having to die.”
While Dr. Sharpless said he’s disappointed by the progress on data in medicine, he had praise to offer, too. In conversations over his first year-plus on the job, he said, he’s learned that “it’s a great time to be a cancer scientist and a cancer doctor in the United States. ... It’s undeniably a great time to be a blood doctor or blood scientist. We’re making progress at a rate that is faster and greater than at any point in my career as an oncologist. Just look at all the new stuff we’ve got!”
In hematology, great strides are being made in areas such as the treatment of leukemia and lymphoma, he said. Progress is also boosting treatment in areas such as melanoma and lung, breast, ovarian, and head and neck cancer.
“Some of you will correctly point out that this progress is not enough. In some cases, treatments are moderately effective and not curative. These are singles or even doubles, but we still need home runs. We still have too many patients dying of cancer, including blood cancer,” he said. “From my perspective, it’s important to be very clear-eyed. While we have a long way to go to end suffering in all patients, we have to be willing to admit that progress has been impressive.”
Dr. Sharpless touted the Cancer Moonshot, which will allocate $1.8 billion in federal funds for cancer research over 7 years. And he mentioned his four priority areas at NCI: Workforce development, basic science, big data, and clinical trials. Initiatives in these areas include prioritization of research by early-career investigators and increased funding for trials, he said.
As for data, he said, “I’ve been trying to explain to congressional leaders why getting control of our data is important.”
Dr. Sharpless likes to point to his own encounter in his kitchen in 2016 – the one that buckled his knees – with an issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. There he found a study that examined molecular determinants of response to decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes (N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 24;375[21]:2023-36).
“I can still close my eyes now and literally see the faces of patients whom I gave ... a very toxic regimen, some of whom had very bad outcomes,” he said. “I know in retrospect, based on certain statistics, I probably used the wrong drug in some of these patients. If we’d been aggregating data in a deliberate way, from the get-go of AML, a result like this would have fallen out immediately. I’m concerned we’re still making these types of mistakes for other cancer subtypes today.”
Moving forward, he said, the goal is “to create large, multimodal data sets ... And put them in the cloud and make them available to the research community in the most useful format possible, in a way that’s safe and secure. We have to do these things because the costs of not harnessing data are too great.”
Dr. Sharpless reported several past financial relationships with G1 Therapeutics, Healthspan Diagnostics, and Unity Biotechnology.
SAN DIEGO – A couple years ago, hematologist-oncologist Norman E. “Ned” Sharpless, MD, was gobsmacked by a groundbreaking study into treatments for acute myeloid leukemia. While the findings offered valuable new insight into the best drug options, they left Dr. Sharpless quaking, and not with delight. “I can recall that my knees buckled,” he said.
Why? Because the findings, he told colleagues at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, came too late for many patients to benefit. “One could say that’s great news, this is medical progress,” he said. “But I saw this as a clear failure of data aggregation.”
Now, Dr. Sharpless is in a position to do more than fume and speak out. He became the director of the National Cancer Institute in 2017 and he’s made “big data” one of his four priorities for the NCI under his leadership.
“While data security is crucial, there are also costs to not aggregating data and sharing it,” he said. “It means giving patients the wrong drug, it means patients having to die.”
While Dr. Sharpless said he’s disappointed by the progress on data in medicine, he had praise to offer, too. In conversations over his first year-plus on the job, he said, he’s learned that “it’s a great time to be a cancer scientist and a cancer doctor in the United States. ... It’s undeniably a great time to be a blood doctor or blood scientist. We’re making progress at a rate that is faster and greater than at any point in my career as an oncologist. Just look at all the new stuff we’ve got!”
In hematology, great strides are being made in areas such as the treatment of leukemia and lymphoma, he said. Progress is also boosting treatment in areas such as melanoma and lung, breast, ovarian, and head and neck cancer.
“Some of you will correctly point out that this progress is not enough. In some cases, treatments are moderately effective and not curative. These are singles or even doubles, but we still need home runs. We still have too many patients dying of cancer, including blood cancer,” he said. “From my perspective, it’s important to be very clear-eyed. While we have a long way to go to end suffering in all patients, we have to be willing to admit that progress has been impressive.”
Dr. Sharpless touted the Cancer Moonshot, which will allocate $1.8 billion in federal funds for cancer research over 7 years. And he mentioned his four priority areas at NCI: Workforce development, basic science, big data, and clinical trials. Initiatives in these areas include prioritization of research by early-career investigators and increased funding for trials, he said.
As for data, he said, “I’ve been trying to explain to congressional leaders why getting control of our data is important.”
Dr. Sharpless likes to point to his own encounter in his kitchen in 2016 – the one that buckled his knees – with an issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. There he found a study that examined molecular determinants of response to decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes (N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 24;375[21]:2023-36).
“I can still close my eyes now and literally see the faces of patients whom I gave ... a very toxic regimen, some of whom had very bad outcomes,” he said. “I know in retrospect, based on certain statistics, I probably used the wrong drug in some of these patients. If we’d been aggregating data in a deliberate way, from the get-go of AML, a result like this would have fallen out immediately. I’m concerned we’re still making these types of mistakes for other cancer subtypes today.”
Moving forward, he said, the goal is “to create large, multimodal data sets ... And put them in the cloud and make them available to the research community in the most useful format possible, in a way that’s safe and secure. We have to do these things because the costs of not harnessing data are too great.”
Dr. Sharpless reported several past financial relationships with G1 Therapeutics, Healthspan Diagnostics, and Unity Biotechnology.
SAN DIEGO – A couple years ago, hematologist-oncologist Norman E. “Ned” Sharpless, MD, was gobsmacked by a groundbreaking study into treatments for acute myeloid leukemia. While the findings offered valuable new insight into the best drug options, they left Dr. Sharpless quaking, and not with delight. “I can recall that my knees buckled,” he said.
Why? Because the findings, he told colleagues at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, came too late for many patients to benefit. “One could say that’s great news, this is medical progress,” he said. “But I saw this as a clear failure of data aggregation.”
Now, Dr. Sharpless is in a position to do more than fume and speak out. He became the director of the National Cancer Institute in 2017 and he’s made “big data” one of his four priorities for the NCI under his leadership.
“While data security is crucial, there are also costs to not aggregating data and sharing it,” he said. “It means giving patients the wrong drug, it means patients having to die.”
While Dr. Sharpless said he’s disappointed by the progress on data in medicine, he had praise to offer, too. In conversations over his first year-plus on the job, he said, he’s learned that “it’s a great time to be a cancer scientist and a cancer doctor in the United States. ... It’s undeniably a great time to be a blood doctor or blood scientist. We’re making progress at a rate that is faster and greater than at any point in my career as an oncologist. Just look at all the new stuff we’ve got!”
In hematology, great strides are being made in areas such as the treatment of leukemia and lymphoma, he said. Progress is also boosting treatment in areas such as melanoma and lung, breast, ovarian, and head and neck cancer.
“Some of you will correctly point out that this progress is not enough. In some cases, treatments are moderately effective and not curative. These are singles or even doubles, but we still need home runs. We still have too many patients dying of cancer, including blood cancer,” he said. “From my perspective, it’s important to be very clear-eyed. While we have a long way to go to end suffering in all patients, we have to be willing to admit that progress has been impressive.”
Dr. Sharpless touted the Cancer Moonshot, which will allocate $1.8 billion in federal funds for cancer research over 7 years. And he mentioned his four priority areas at NCI: Workforce development, basic science, big data, and clinical trials. Initiatives in these areas include prioritization of research by early-career investigators and increased funding for trials, he said.
As for data, he said, “I’ve been trying to explain to congressional leaders why getting control of our data is important.”
Dr. Sharpless likes to point to his own encounter in his kitchen in 2016 – the one that buckled his knees – with an issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. There he found a study that examined molecular determinants of response to decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes (N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 24;375[21]:2023-36).
“I can still close my eyes now and literally see the faces of patients whom I gave ... a very toxic regimen, some of whom had very bad outcomes,” he said. “I know in retrospect, based on certain statistics, I probably used the wrong drug in some of these patients. If we’d been aggregating data in a deliberate way, from the get-go of AML, a result like this would have fallen out immediately. I’m concerned we’re still making these types of mistakes for other cancer subtypes today.”
Moving forward, he said, the goal is “to create large, multimodal data sets ... And put them in the cloud and make them available to the research community in the most useful format possible, in a way that’s safe and secure. We have to do these things because the costs of not harnessing data are too great.”
Dr. Sharpless reported several past financial relationships with G1 Therapeutics, Healthspan Diagnostics, and Unity Biotechnology.
REPORTING FROM ASH 2018
NSAIDs can play major role in pre- and postoperative hysterectomy pain
LAS VEGAS – An ob.gyn. has some handy hysterectomy-related pain management tips for her colleagues: Don’t assume patients know how to titrate between NSAIDs and opioids after surgery. Consider neuropathic medications alone in patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomies. And
Sawsan As-Sanie, MD, MPH, director of the University of Michigan Endometriosis Center, Ann Arbor, offered these and other recommendations about hysterectomy-related pain at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.
Try acetaminophen and an NSAID
In the preoperative period, a combination of acetaminophen (Tylenol) and an NSAID can provide significant postop relief, Dr. As-Sanie said.
She highlighted a 2010 systematic review of 21 studies that included 1,909 patients and found acetaminophen/NSAID combinations improved pain intensity by about 35% in positive studies when compared with either acetaminophen or NSAID alone. The painkiller combination was positive – more effective than a solo agent – in 85% of studies of combo versus acetaminophen alone and 64% of studies of combo versus NSAID alone (Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110[4]:1170-9).
Another study, she said, found that there’s no clear advantage to IV administration for acetaminophen if patients can take the drug orally (Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015 May-Jun;68[3]:238-47).
Consider gabapentin, but not postoperatively
Dr. As-Sanie pointed to a 2014 systematic review and meta-analysis that suggested the use of preoperative gabapentin in abdominal hysterectomy reduces pain and opioid use. However, adding postoperative doses of gabapentin, she said, don’t appear to produce a greater effect (Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123[6]:1221-9).
Consider neuropathics for minimally invasive hysterectomy
Two studies, one in 2004 and the other in 2008, suggest that gabapentin (on a postop basis) and pregabalin (perioperatively) can reduce postop opioid use. (Pregabalin also was linked to more adverse effects.) “Even if they’re having a little bit of pain, they’re using fewer opioids,” she said (Pain. 2004 Jul;110[1-2]:175-81; Pain. 2008 Jan;134[1-2]:106-12).
Educate patients about postop painkiller use
Don’t assume that patients know how to adjust their over-the-counter painkiller use after surgery, Dr. As-Sanie said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company. “While we as physicians think that knowledge about the use of ibuprofen and Tylenol is something everyone should be born with, it’s not obvious to most patients and families.”
It’s important to teach patients to start with NSAIDs or Tylenol postoperatively, and if that doesn’t control pain, “you add opioids and use medications to control constipation as needed. As you recover, you reduce the amount of opioids first and then reduce the NSAIDs or Tylenol,” she said. “That education can be very helpful for the vast majority of patients, and it’s one of the most important things we can provide.”
Don’t over-prescribe opioids
For a 2017 study, Dr. As-Sanie and colleagues tracked hysterectomy patients and surveyed them about their postop opioid use. “When asked 2 weeks after surgery, most used far less than half of what they prescribed,” Dr. As-Sanie said. “If we gave them about 40 pills, they had between 13-15 pills left after the surgery on average. Nearly 50% didn’t use any of their medication” (Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130[6]:1261-8).
Dr. As-Sanie urged colleagues to remember the lesson of the rise of super-sized portions at fast-food restaurants: Give people more of something and they’ll eat (or use) more of it. And the reverse is true: “If you give people fewer pills, they will use fewer pills.”
Dr. As-Sanie highlighted the recommendations about opioid prescription levels for various surgical procedures, including different types of hysterectomies, at www.opioidprescribing.info. The recommendations are provided by the Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network. They’re designed for opioid-naive patients and suggest the lowest doses for vaginal hysterectomy and the highest for abdominal hysterectomy, with recommended doses for laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in between.
Dr. As-Sanie disclosed she is a consultant for AbbVie and Myovant.
LAS VEGAS – An ob.gyn. has some handy hysterectomy-related pain management tips for her colleagues: Don’t assume patients know how to titrate between NSAIDs and opioids after surgery. Consider neuropathic medications alone in patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomies. And
Sawsan As-Sanie, MD, MPH, director of the University of Michigan Endometriosis Center, Ann Arbor, offered these and other recommendations about hysterectomy-related pain at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.
Try acetaminophen and an NSAID
In the preoperative period, a combination of acetaminophen (Tylenol) and an NSAID can provide significant postop relief, Dr. As-Sanie said.
She highlighted a 2010 systematic review of 21 studies that included 1,909 patients and found acetaminophen/NSAID combinations improved pain intensity by about 35% in positive studies when compared with either acetaminophen or NSAID alone. The painkiller combination was positive – more effective than a solo agent – in 85% of studies of combo versus acetaminophen alone and 64% of studies of combo versus NSAID alone (Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110[4]:1170-9).
Another study, she said, found that there’s no clear advantage to IV administration for acetaminophen if patients can take the drug orally (Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015 May-Jun;68[3]:238-47).
Consider gabapentin, but not postoperatively
Dr. As-Sanie pointed to a 2014 systematic review and meta-analysis that suggested the use of preoperative gabapentin in abdominal hysterectomy reduces pain and opioid use. However, adding postoperative doses of gabapentin, she said, don’t appear to produce a greater effect (Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123[6]:1221-9).
Consider neuropathics for minimally invasive hysterectomy
Two studies, one in 2004 and the other in 2008, suggest that gabapentin (on a postop basis) and pregabalin (perioperatively) can reduce postop opioid use. (Pregabalin also was linked to more adverse effects.) “Even if they’re having a little bit of pain, they’re using fewer opioids,” she said (Pain. 2004 Jul;110[1-2]:175-81; Pain. 2008 Jan;134[1-2]:106-12).
Educate patients about postop painkiller use
Don’t assume that patients know how to adjust their over-the-counter painkiller use after surgery, Dr. As-Sanie said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company. “While we as physicians think that knowledge about the use of ibuprofen and Tylenol is something everyone should be born with, it’s not obvious to most patients and families.”
It’s important to teach patients to start with NSAIDs or Tylenol postoperatively, and if that doesn’t control pain, “you add opioids and use medications to control constipation as needed. As you recover, you reduce the amount of opioids first and then reduce the NSAIDs or Tylenol,” she said. “That education can be very helpful for the vast majority of patients, and it’s one of the most important things we can provide.”
Don’t over-prescribe opioids
For a 2017 study, Dr. As-Sanie and colleagues tracked hysterectomy patients and surveyed them about their postop opioid use. “When asked 2 weeks after surgery, most used far less than half of what they prescribed,” Dr. As-Sanie said. “If we gave them about 40 pills, they had between 13-15 pills left after the surgery on average. Nearly 50% didn’t use any of their medication” (Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130[6]:1261-8).
Dr. As-Sanie urged colleagues to remember the lesson of the rise of super-sized portions at fast-food restaurants: Give people more of something and they’ll eat (or use) more of it. And the reverse is true: “If you give people fewer pills, they will use fewer pills.”
Dr. As-Sanie highlighted the recommendations about opioid prescription levels for various surgical procedures, including different types of hysterectomies, at www.opioidprescribing.info. The recommendations are provided by the Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network. They’re designed for opioid-naive patients and suggest the lowest doses for vaginal hysterectomy and the highest for abdominal hysterectomy, with recommended doses for laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in between.
Dr. As-Sanie disclosed she is a consultant for AbbVie and Myovant.
LAS VEGAS – An ob.gyn. has some handy hysterectomy-related pain management tips for her colleagues: Don’t assume patients know how to titrate between NSAIDs and opioids after surgery. Consider neuropathic medications alone in patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomies. And
Sawsan As-Sanie, MD, MPH, director of the University of Michigan Endometriosis Center, Ann Arbor, offered these and other recommendations about hysterectomy-related pain at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium.
Try acetaminophen and an NSAID
In the preoperative period, a combination of acetaminophen (Tylenol) and an NSAID can provide significant postop relief, Dr. As-Sanie said.
She highlighted a 2010 systematic review of 21 studies that included 1,909 patients and found acetaminophen/NSAID combinations improved pain intensity by about 35% in positive studies when compared with either acetaminophen or NSAID alone. The painkiller combination was positive – more effective than a solo agent – in 85% of studies of combo versus acetaminophen alone and 64% of studies of combo versus NSAID alone (Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110[4]:1170-9).
Another study, she said, found that there’s no clear advantage to IV administration for acetaminophen if patients can take the drug orally (Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015 May-Jun;68[3]:238-47).
Consider gabapentin, but not postoperatively
Dr. As-Sanie pointed to a 2014 systematic review and meta-analysis that suggested the use of preoperative gabapentin in abdominal hysterectomy reduces pain and opioid use. However, adding postoperative doses of gabapentin, she said, don’t appear to produce a greater effect (Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123[6]:1221-9).
Consider neuropathics for minimally invasive hysterectomy
Two studies, one in 2004 and the other in 2008, suggest that gabapentin (on a postop basis) and pregabalin (perioperatively) can reduce postop opioid use. (Pregabalin also was linked to more adverse effects.) “Even if they’re having a little bit of pain, they’re using fewer opioids,” she said (Pain. 2004 Jul;110[1-2]:175-81; Pain. 2008 Jan;134[1-2]:106-12).
Educate patients about postop painkiller use
Don’t assume that patients know how to adjust their over-the-counter painkiller use after surgery, Dr. As-Sanie said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company. “While we as physicians think that knowledge about the use of ibuprofen and Tylenol is something everyone should be born with, it’s not obvious to most patients and families.”
It’s important to teach patients to start with NSAIDs or Tylenol postoperatively, and if that doesn’t control pain, “you add opioids and use medications to control constipation as needed. As you recover, you reduce the amount of opioids first and then reduce the NSAIDs or Tylenol,” she said. “That education can be very helpful for the vast majority of patients, and it’s one of the most important things we can provide.”
Don’t over-prescribe opioids
For a 2017 study, Dr. As-Sanie and colleagues tracked hysterectomy patients and surveyed them about their postop opioid use. “When asked 2 weeks after surgery, most used far less than half of what they prescribed,” Dr. As-Sanie said. “If we gave them about 40 pills, they had between 13-15 pills left after the surgery on average. Nearly 50% didn’t use any of their medication” (Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130[6]:1261-8).
Dr. As-Sanie urged colleagues to remember the lesson of the rise of super-sized portions at fast-food restaurants: Give people more of something and they’ll eat (or use) more of it. And the reverse is true: “If you give people fewer pills, they will use fewer pills.”
Dr. As-Sanie highlighted the recommendations about opioid prescription levels for various surgical procedures, including different types of hysterectomies, at www.opioidprescribing.info. The recommendations are provided by the Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network. They’re designed for opioid-naive patients and suggest the lowest doses for vaginal hysterectomy and the highest for abdominal hysterectomy, with recommended doses for laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in between.
Dr. As-Sanie disclosed she is a consultant for AbbVie and Myovant.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM PAGS
Gap in care: Female patients with incontinence
LAS VEGAS – A pelvic surgeon brought a bold message to a gathering of gynecologists: There’s a great gap in American care for pelvic floor disorders such as urinary incontinence, and they’re the right physicians to make a difference by treating these common conditions.
“There are never going to be enough specialists to deal with these problems. This is a natural progression for many of you,” said urogynecologist and pelvic surgeon Mickey M. Karram, MD, in a joint presentation at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium. In fact, he said, “there’s so much disease out there to fix that you may become more overwhelmed.”
Dr. Karram, who has offices in Cincinnati, Beverly Hills, and Orange County, Calif., spoke about female urinary incontinence with obstetrician-gynecologist Beri M. Ridgeway, MD, of Cleveland Clinic. They offered these tips:
Test for stress incontinence
Dr. Karram recommends using a “quick and easy” cystometrogram (CMG) test to “corroborate or refute what the patient thinks is going on” in regard to urinary function. “With this simple test, you’ll get a clear understanding of sensation [to urinate] and of what their fullness and capacity numbers are,” he said. And if you have the patient cough or strain during the test, “you should be able to duplicate a sign of stress incontinence 90% of the time.”
If patients don’t leak when they take this test, there may be another problem such as overactive bladder, a condition that can’t be duplicated via the test, he said.
Ask the right questions
When it comes to identifying when they have urinary difficulties, some patients “say yes to every question we ask,” said Dr. Ridgeway, and they may not be able to distinguish between urgency and leakage.
A better approach is to ask women to provide specific examples of when they have continence issues, she said. It’s also useful to ask patients about what bothers them the most if they have multiple symptoms: Is it urgency (“Gotta go; gotta go”)? Leakage during certain situations like coughing and laughing? “That helps me decide how to go about treating them first and foremost,” she said. “It doesn’t mean you won’t treat both [problems], but it really gives you a reference point of where to start.”
Research suggests that women tend to be more bothered by urge incontinence than stress incontinence, she said, because they can regulate their activities or avoid the stress form.
Beware of acute incontinence cases
“If a woman walks in and says ‘Everything was great until a week or two ago, but now I’m living in pads,’ it could be a fecal impaction or a pelvic mass,” Dr. Karram said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.
Discuss the many treatment options
In some cases of incontinence, Dr. Ridgeway said she’ll mention “the array of treatment options, such as pelvic floor physical therapy, bladder retraining, vaginal estrogen, medications, and Botox.”
She added: “I explain that we’ll work together, and sometimes it will take a couple tries, or we’ll try a couple things at once.”
Dr. Ridgeway disclosed consulting for Coloplast and serving as an independent contractor (legal) for Ethicon. Dr. Karram disclosed speaking for Allergan, Astellas Pharma, Coloplast, and Cynosure/Hologic; consulting for Coloplast and Cynosure/Hologic; and receiving royalties from BihlerMed.
LAS VEGAS – A pelvic surgeon brought a bold message to a gathering of gynecologists: There’s a great gap in American care for pelvic floor disorders such as urinary incontinence, and they’re the right physicians to make a difference by treating these common conditions.
“There are never going to be enough specialists to deal with these problems. This is a natural progression for many of you,” said urogynecologist and pelvic surgeon Mickey M. Karram, MD, in a joint presentation at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium. In fact, he said, “there’s so much disease out there to fix that you may become more overwhelmed.”
Dr. Karram, who has offices in Cincinnati, Beverly Hills, and Orange County, Calif., spoke about female urinary incontinence with obstetrician-gynecologist Beri M. Ridgeway, MD, of Cleveland Clinic. They offered these tips:
Test for stress incontinence
Dr. Karram recommends using a “quick and easy” cystometrogram (CMG) test to “corroborate or refute what the patient thinks is going on” in regard to urinary function. “With this simple test, you’ll get a clear understanding of sensation [to urinate] and of what their fullness and capacity numbers are,” he said. And if you have the patient cough or strain during the test, “you should be able to duplicate a sign of stress incontinence 90% of the time.”
If patients don’t leak when they take this test, there may be another problem such as overactive bladder, a condition that can’t be duplicated via the test, he said.
Ask the right questions
When it comes to identifying when they have urinary difficulties, some patients “say yes to every question we ask,” said Dr. Ridgeway, and they may not be able to distinguish between urgency and leakage.
A better approach is to ask women to provide specific examples of when they have continence issues, she said. It’s also useful to ask patients about what bothers them the most if they have multiple symptoms: Is it urgency (“Gotta go; gotta go”)? Leakage during certain situations like coughing and laughing? “That helps me decide how to go about treating them first and foremost,” she said. “It doesn’t mean you won’t treat both [problems], but it really gives you a reference point of where to start.”
Research suggests that women tend to be more bothered by urge incontinence than stress incontinence, she said, because they can regulate their activities or avoid the stress form.
Beware of acute incontinence cases
“If a woman walks in and says ‘Everything was great until a week or two ago, but now I’m living in pads,’ it could be a fecal impaction or a pelvic mass,” Dr. Karram said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.
Discuss the many treatment options
In some cases of incontinence, Dr. Ridgeway said she’ll mention “the array of treatment options, such as pelvic floor physical therapy, bladder retraining, vaginal estrogen, medications, and Botox.”
She added: “I explain that we’ll work together, and sometimes it will take a couple tries, or we’ll try a couple things at once.”
Dr. Ridgeway disclosed consulting for Coloplast and serving as an independent contractor (legal) for Ethicon. Dr. Karram disclosed speaking for Allergan, Astellas Pharma, Coloplast, and Cynosure/Hologic; consulting for Coloplast and Cynosure/Hologic; and receiving royalties from BihlerMed.
LAS VEGAS – A pelvic surgeon brought a bold message to a gathering of gynecologists: There’s a great gap in American care for pelvic floor disorders such as urinary incontinence, and they’re the right physicians to make a difference by treating these common conditions.
“There are never going to be enough specialists to deal with these problems. This is a natural progression for many of you,” said urogynecologist and pelvic surgeon Mickey M. Karram, MD, in a joint presentation at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium. In fact, he said, “there’s so much disease out there to fix that you may become more overwhelmed.”
Dr. Karram, who has offices in Cincinnati, Beverly Hills, and Orange County, Calif., spoke about female urinary incontinence with obstetrician-gynecologist Beri M. Ridgeway, MD, of Cleveland Clinic. They offered these tips:
Test for stress incontinence
Dr. Karram recommends using a “quick and easy” cystometrogram (CMG) test to “corroborate or refute what the patient thinks is going on” in regard to urinary function. “With this simple test, you’ll get a clear understanding of sensation [to urinate] and of what their fullness and capacity numbers are,” he said. And if you have the patient cough or strain during the test, “you should be able to duplicate a sign of stress incontinence 90% of the time.”
If patients don’t leak when they take this test, there may be another problem such as overactive bladder, a condition that can’t be duplicated via the test, he said.
Ask the right questions
When it comes to identifying when they have urinary difficulties, some patients “say yes to every question we ask,” said Dr. Ridgeway, and they may not be able to distinguish between urgency and leakage.
A better approach is to ask women to provide specific examples of when they have continence issues, she said. It’s also useful to ask patients about what bothers them the most if they have multiple symptoms: Is it urgency (“Gotta go; gotta go”)? Leakage during certain situations like coughing and laughing? “That helps me decide how to go about treating them first and foremost,” she said. “It doesn’t mean you won’t treat both [problems], but it really gives you a reference point of where to start.”
Research suggests that women tend to be more bothered by urge incontinence than stress incontinence, she said, because they can regulate their activities or avoid the stress form.
Beware of acute incontinence cases
“If a woman walks in and says ‘Everything was great until a week or two ago, but now I’m living in pads,’ it could be a fecal impaction or a pelvic mass,” Dr. Karram said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.
Discuss the many treatment options
In some cases of incontinence, Dr. Ridgeway said she’ll mention “the array of treatment options, such as pelvic floor physical therapy, bladder retraining, vaginal estrogen, medications, and Botox.”
She added: “I explain that we’ll work together, and sometimes it will take a couple tries, or we’ll try a couple things at once.”
Dr. Ridgeway disclosed consulting for Coloplast and serving as an independent contractor (legal) for Ethicon. Dr. Karram disclosed speaking for Allergan, Astellas Pharma, Coloplast, and Cynosure/Hologic; consulting for Coloplast and Cynosure/Hologic; and receiving royalties from BihlerMed.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM PAGS
When is it appropriate to remove ovaries in hysterectomy?
LAS VEGAS – The removal of both ovaries during hysterectomy – bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) – has declined sharply in popularity as physicians have become more aware of its risks.
Still, “we’re still seeing a relatively high rate of inappropriate BSO,” Amanda Nickles Fader, MD, said, despite “the many benefits of ovarian conservation. Strong consideration should be made for maintaining normal ovaries in premenopausal women who are not at higher genetic risk of ovarian cancer.”
Dr. Nickles Fader, director of the Kelly gynecologic oncology service and the director of the center for rare gynecologic cancers at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, who spoke at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium, urged gynecologists to understand the data about ovarian conservation in hysterectomy and carefully counsel patients.
“We can counsel patients with 100% certainty that BSO absolutely reduces ovarian and fallopian tube cancer rates. That’s a given,” she said. “Women get very excited about that, but you’ve got to be careful to counsel them about the flip side: The overall benefit may not be there when you consider the other morbidity and mortality that may occur because of this removal.”
As she noted, multiple retrospective, prospective, and observational studies have linked ovary removal to a variety of heightened risks, especially on the cardiac front. She highlighted a 2009 study of nearly 30,000 nurses who’d undergone hysterectomy for benign disease, about which the authors wrote that, “compared with ovarian conservation, bilateral oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease is associated with a decreased risk of breast and ovarian cancer but an increased risk of all-cause mortality, fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease, and lung cancer.” No age group gained a survival benefit from oophorectomy (Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;113[5]:1027-37 ).
Meanwhile, over the past decade, the “pendulum has swung” toward ovary conservation, at least in premenopausal women, Dr. Nickles Fader said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.
A 2016 analysis of health statistics in five U.S. Eastern and Midwestern states found that, rates of hospital-based, hysterectomy-alone procedures grew by 15% from 2005 to 2013, while rates of oophorectomy alone and hysterectomy/oophorectomy combination procedures declined by 12% and 29%, respectively.
Still, Dr. Nickles Fader said, as many as 60% of hysterectomies are still performed in conjunction with oophorectomy.
Ovary removal, of course, can be appropriate when patients are at risk of ovarian cancer. Hereditary ovarian cancer accounts for up to 25% of epithelial ovarian cancer, she said, and research suggests that risk-reducing surgery is an effective preventative approach when high-penetrance genes are present. However, the value of the surgery is less clear in regard to moderate-penetrance genes.
Dr. Nickles Fader pointed to guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network that specify genes and syndromes that should trigger risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or hysterectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy after childbirth.
Researchers are exploring salpingectomy – fallopian tube removal – as a possible replacement for oophorectomy. Dr. Nickles Fader highlighted a small pilot study published in 2018 that reported “BRCA mutation carriers who underwent bilateral salpingectomy had no intraoperative complications, were satisfied with their procedure choice, and had decreased cancer worry and anxiety after the procedure.”
Moving forward, she said, research will provide more insight into preventative options such as removing fallopian tubes alone instead of ovaries. “We’re starting to learn, and will probably know in the next 10-15 years, whether oophorectomy is necessary for all high-risk and moderate-risk women or if we can get away with removing their tubes and giving them the maximal health benefits of ovarian conservation.”
Dr. Nickles Fader reported consulting for Ethicon Endosurgery.
LAS VEGAS – The removal of both ovaries during hysterectomy – bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) – has declined sharply in popularity as physicians have become more aware of its risks.
Still, “we’re still seeing a relatively high rate of inappropriate BSO,” Amanda Nickles Fader, MD, said, despite “the many benefits of ovarian conservation. Strong consideration should be made for maintaining normal ovaries in premenopausal women who are not at higher genetic risk of ovarian cancer.”
Dr. Nickles Fader, director of the Kelly gynecologic oncology service and the director of the center for rare gynecologic cancers at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, who spoke at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium, urged gynecologists to understand the data about ovarian conservation in hysterectomy and carefully counsel patients.
“We can counsel patients with 100% certainty that BSO absolutely reduces ovarian and fallopian tube cancer rates. That’s a given,” she said. “Women get very excited about that, but you’ve got to be careful to counsel them about the flip side: The overall benefit may not be there when you consider the other morbidity and mortality that may occur because of this removal.”
As she noted, multiple retrospective, prospective, and observational studies have linked ovary removal to a variety of heightened risks, especially on the cardiac front. She highlighted a 2009 study of nearly 30,000 nurses who’d undergone hysterectomy for benign disease, about which the authors wrote that, “compared with ovarian conservation, bilateral oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease is associated with a decreased risk of breast and ovarian cancer but an increased risk of all-cause mortality, fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease, and lung cancer.” No age group gained a survival benefit from oophorectomy (Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;113[5]:1027-37 ).
Meanwhile, over the past decade, the “pendulum has swung” toward ovary conservation, at least in premenopausal women, Dr. Nickles Fader said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.
A 2016 analysis of health statistics in five U.S. Eastern and Midwestern states found that, rates of hospital-based, hysterectomy-alone procedures grew by 15% from 2005 to 2013, while rates of oophorectomy alone and hysterectomy/oophorectomy combination procedures declined by 12% and 29%, respectively.
Still, Dr. Nickles Fader said, as many as 60% of hysterectomies are still performed in conjunction with oophorectomy.
Ovary removal, of course, can be appropriate when patients are at risk of ovarian cancer. Hereditary ovarian cancer accounts for up to 25% of epithelial ovarian cancer, she said, and research suggests that risk-reducing surgery is an effective preventative approach when high-penetrance genes are present. However, the value of the surgery is less clear in regard to moderate-penetrance genes.
Dr. Nickles Fader pointed to guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network that specify genes and syndromes that should trigger risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or hysterectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy after childbirth.
Researchers are exploring salpingectomy – fallopian tube removal – as a possible replacement for oophorectomy. Dr. Nickles Fader highlighted a small pilot study published in 2018 that reported “BRCA mutation carriers who underwent bilateral salpingectomy had no intraoperative complications, were satisfied with their procedure choice, and had decreased cancer worry and anxiety after the procedure.”
Moving forward, she said, research will provide more insight into preventative options such as removing fallopian tubes alone instead of ovaries. “We’re starting to learn, and will probably know in the next 10-15 years, whether oophorectomy is necessary for all high-risk and moderate-risk women or if we can get away with removing their tubes and giving them the maximal health benefits of ovarian conservation.”
Dr. Nickles Fader reported consulting for Ethicon Endosurgery.
LAS VEGAS – The removal of both ovaries during hysterectomy – bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) – has declined sharply in popularity as physicians have become more aware of its risks.
Still, “we’re still seeing a relatively high rate of inappropriate BSO,” Amanda Nickles Fader, MD, said, despite “the many benefits of ovarian conservation. Strong consideration should be made for maintaining normal ovaries in premenopausal women who are not at higher genetic risk of ovarian cancer.”
Dr. Nickles Fader, director of the Kelly gynecologic oncology service and the director of the center for rare gynecologic cancers at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, who spoke at the Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery Symposium, urged gynecologists to understand the data about ovarian conservation in hysterectomy and carefully counsel patients.
“We can counsel patients with 100% certainty that BSO absolutely reduces ovarian and fallopian tube cancer rates. That’s a given,” she said. “Women get very excited about that, but you’ve got to be careful to counsel them about the flip side: The overall benefit may not be there when you consider the other morbidity and mortality that may occur because of this removal.”
As she noted, multiple retrospective, prospective, and observational studies have linked ovary removal to a variety of heightened risks, especially on the cardiac front. She highlighted a 2009 study of nearly 30,000 nurses who’d undergone hysterectomy for benign disease, about which the authors wrote that, “compared with ovarian conservation, bilateral oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease is associated with a decreased risk of breast and ovarian cancer but an increased risk of all-cause mortality, fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease, and lung cancer.” No age group gained a survival benefit from oophorectomy (Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;113[5]:1027-37 ).
Meanwhile, over the past decade, the “pendulum has swung” toward ovary conservation, at least in premenopausal women, Dr. Nickles Fader said at the meeting jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.
A 2016 analysis of health statistics in five U.S. Eastern and Midwestern states found that, rates of hospital-based, hysterectomy-alone procedures grew by 15% from 2005 to 2013, while rates of oophorectomy alone and hysterectomy/oophorectomy combination procedures declined by 12% and 29%, respectively.
Still, Dr. Nickles Fader said, as many as 60% of hysterectomies are still performed in conjunction with oophorectomy.
Ovary removal, of course, can be appropriate when patients are at risk of ovarian cancer. Hereditary ovarian cancer accounts for up to 25% of epithelial ovarian cancer, she said, and research suggests that risk-reducing surgery is an effective preventative approach when high-penetrance genes are present. However, the value of the surgery is less clear in regard to moderate-penetrance genes.
Dr. Nickles Fader pointed to guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network that specify genes and syndromes that should trigger risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or hysterectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy after childbirth.
Researchers are exploring salpingectomy – fallopian tube removal – as a possible replacement for oophorectomy. Dr. Nickles Fader highlighted a small pilot study published in 2018 that reported “BRCA mutation carriers who underwent bilateral salpingectomy had no intraoperative complications, were satisfied with their procedure choice, and had decreased cancer worry and anxiety after the procedure.”
Moving forward, she said, research will provide more insight into preventative options such as removing fallopian tubes alone instead of ovaries. “We’re starting to learn, and will probably know in the next 10-15 years, whether oophorectomy is necessary for all high-risk and moderate-risk women or if we can get away with removing their tubes and giving them the maximal health benefits of ovarian conservation.”
Dr. Nickles Fader reported consulting for Ethicon Endosurgery.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM PAGS
Despite risks, exercise is important for patients with sickle cell
SAN DIEGO – Don’t let all your patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA) and sickle cell trait (SCT) off the hook when it comes to exercise. That was the advice from Robert I. Liem, MD, a pediatric hematologist-oncologist who studies fitness.
While some patients may face risk, these conditions should pose less of a barrier to moderate- and even high-intensity exercise, Dr. Liem, of Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago and Northwestern University, Chicago, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
“Instead of just focusing on potential harms, we should consider a paradigm shift, especially in sickle cell anemia,” he said. “There, we can start to consider the benefits of exercise, which may include some disease-modifying effects.”
There have been no formal studies into whether high-intensity exercise poses harm in patients with SCA, Dr. Liem noted. Why? There are several reasons, he said, including concern that exercise could increase sickling of red blood cells and assumptions about “sedentary behavior” in SCA.
However, there are indications that factors other than SCA may be reducing fitness in this population, a fact that could potentially be reversed by exercise.
Dr. Liem led a study that found “children and young adults with SCA have reduced exercise capacity attributable to factors independent of anemia.” The study showed that peak VO2 was 30% lower in children and young adults with SCA, compared with controls (Physiol Rep. 2015. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12338).
There are many possible explanations for this, he said, including patient-related factors such as pain during exercise and poor access to fitness resources.
Another study found low fitness in 83% of adults with SCA and identified chronic anemia as the most important factor (Am J Hematol. 2014 Aug;89[8]:819-24).
In patients with sickle cell trait, which Dr. Liem said affects an estimated 6%-9% of African-Americans, early reports of sudden death appeared in the 1960s and 1970s, and recent studies have provided more insight into the risk.
In 2012, a study tracked NCAA student athletes and found that Division I football players with SCT faced a 37-fold higher risk of exertion-related death than did athletes without SCT. Five players with SCT, all black and all Division I football players, had died over a 5-year period (Br J Sports Med 2012 Apr;46[5]:325-30).
A 2016 study, meanwhile, tracked more than 47,000 black soldiers in the U.S. Army and found those with SCT didn’t face a higher risk of death although they did have a “significantly higher risk” of exertional rhabdomyolysis (N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4; 375[5]:435-42).
While the cause of exercise-related harm in SCT isn’t fully understood, Dr. Liem said, it’s possible that extreme states such as severe dehydration, acidosis, and hypoxemia may trigger sickling. A combination of SCT, extreme exercise, heat, and genetic predisposition could produce harm by creating a “perfect storm,” he added.
Should patients with SCA or SCT exercise? Yes, Dr. Liem said, pointing to the importance of fitness in the general population.
Exercising to volitional exhaustion appears to be safe in children and adults with SCA, he said, and lack of exercise could lead to a variety of negative effects on growth in children and on quality of life.
There are “limited but promising data” linking exercise to benefits in SCA and SCT populations, he said.
Moving forward, Dr. Liem noted that guidelines from the NCAA and National Athletic Trainers’ Association offer insight into exercise best practices in SCT. They’re designed to promote acclimation during training, access to fluids, and prompt recognition of symptoms of heat-related illness and a condition known as “exercise collapse associated with sickle trait.”
However, there are no guidelines for exercise in SCA and it’s not helpful to let patients set limits on themselves based on the symptoms they experience, he said.
Dr. Liem reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – Don’t let all your patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA) and sickle cell trait (SCT) off the hook when it comes to exercise. That was the advice from Robert I. Liem, MD, a pediatric hematologist-oncologist who studies fitness.
While some patients may face risk, these conditions should pose less of a barrier to moderate- and even high-intensity exercise, Dr. Liem, of Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago and Northwestern University, Chicago, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
“Instead of just focusing on potential harms, we should consider a paradigm shift, especially in sickle cell anemia,” he said. “There, we can start to consider the benefits of exercise, which may include some disease-modifying effects.”
There have been no formal studies into whether high-intensity exercise poses harm in patients with SCA, Dr. Liem noted. Why? There are several reasons, he said, including concern that exercise could increase sickling of red blood cells and assumptions about “sedentary behavior” in SCA.
However, there are indications that factors other than SCA may be reducing fitness in this population, a fact that could potentially be reversed by exercise.
Dr. Liem led a study that found “children and young adults with SCA have reduced exercise capacity attributable to factors independent of anemia.” The study showed that peak VO2 was 30% lower in children and young adults with SCA, compared with controls (Physiol Rep. 2015. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12338).
There are many possible explanations for this, he said, including patient-related factors such as pain during exercise and poor access to fitness resources.
Another study found low fitness in 83% of adults with SCA and identified chronic anemia as the most important factor (Am J Hematol. 2014 Aug;89[8]:819-24).
In patients with sickle cell trait, which Dr. Liem said affects an estimated 6%-9% of African-Americans, early reports of sudden death appeared in the 1960s and 1970s, and recent studies have provided more insight into the risk.
In 2012, a study tracked NCAA student athletes and found that Division I football players with SCT faced a 37-fold higher risk of exertion-related death than did athletes without SCT. Five players with SCT, all black and all Division I football players, had died over a 5-year period (Br J Sports Med 2012 Apr;46[5]:325-30).
A 2016 study, meanwhile, tracked more than 47,000 black soldiers in the U.S. Army and found those with SCT didn’t face a higher risk of death although they did have a “significantly higher risk” of exertional rhabdomyolysis (N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4; 375[5]:435-42).
While the cause of exercise-related harm in SCT isn’t fully understood, Dr. Liem said, it’s possible that extreme states such as severe dehydration, acidosis, and hypoxemia may trigger sickling. A combination of SCT, extreme exercise, heat, and genetic predisposition could produce harm by creating a “perfect storm,” he added.
Should patients with SCA or SCT exercise? Yes, Dr. Liem said, pointing to the importance of fitness in the general population.
Exercising to volitional exhaustion appears to be safe in children and adults with SCA, he said, and lack of exercise could lead to a variety of negative effects on growth in children and on quality of life.
There are “limited but promising data” linking exercise to benefits in SCA and SCT populations, he said.
Moving forward, Dr. Liem noted that guidelines from the NCAA and National Athletic Trainers’ Association offer insight into exercise best practices in SCT. They’re designed to promote acclimation during training, access to fluids, and prompt recognition of symptoms of heat-related illness and a condition known as “exercise collapse associated with sickle trait.”
However, there are no guidelines for exercise in SCA and it’s not helpful to let patients set limits on themselves based on the symptoms they experience, he said.
Dr. Liem reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – Don’t let all your patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA) and sickle cell trait (SCT) off the hook when it comes to exercise. That was the advice from Robert I. Liem, MD, a pediatric hematologist-oncologist who studies fitness.
While some patients may face risk, these conditions should pose less of a barrier to moderate- and even high-intensity exercise, Dr. Liem, of Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago and Northwestern University, Chicago, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.
“Instead of just focusing on potential harms, we should consider a paradigm shift, especially in sickle cell anemia,” he said. “There, we can start to consider the benefits of exercise, which may include some disease-modifying effects.”
There have been no formal studies into whether high-intensity exercise poses harm in patients with SCA, Dr. Liem noted. Why? There are several reasons, he said, including concern that exercise could increase sickling of red blood cells and assumptions about “sedentary behavior” in SCA.
However, there are indications that factors other than SCA may be reducing fitness in this population, a fact that could potentially be reversed by exercise.
Dr. Liem led a study that found “children and young adults with SCA have reduced exercise capacity attributable to factors independent of anemia.” The study showed that peak VO2 was 30% lower in children and young adults with SCA, compared with controls (Physiol Rep. 2015. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12338).
There are many possible explanations for this, he said, including patient-related factors such as pain during exercise and poor access to fitness resources.
Another study found low fitness in 83% of adults with SCA and identified chronic anemia as the most important factor (Am J Hematol. 2014 Aug;89[8]:819-24).
In patients with sickle cell trait, which Dr. Liem said affects an estimated 6%-9% of African-Americans, early reports of sudden death appeared in the 1960s and 1970s, and recent studies have provided more insight into the risk.
In 2012, a study tracked NCAA student athletes and found that Division I football players with SCT faced a 37-fold higher risk of exertion-related death than did athletes without SCT. Five players with SCT, all black and all Division I football players, had died over a 5-year period (Br J Sports Med 2012 Apr;46[5]:325-30).
A 2016 study, meanwhile, tracked more than 47,000 black soldiers in the U.S. Army and found those with SCT didn’t face a higher risk of death although they did have a “significantly higher risk” of exertional rhabdomyolysis (N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4; 375[5]:435-42).
While the cause of exercise-related harm in SCT isn’t fully understood, Dr. Liem said, it’s possible that extreme states such as severe dehydration, acidosis, and hypoxemia may trigger sickling. A combination of SCT, extreme exercise, heat, and genetic predisposition could produce harm by creating a “perfect storm,” he added.
Should patients with SCA or SCT exercise? Yes, Dr. Liem said, pointing to the importance of fitness in the general population.
Exercising to volitional exhaustion appears to be safe in children and adults with SCA, he said, and lack of exercise could lead to a variety of negative effects on growth in children and on quality of life.
There are “limited but promising data” linking exercise to benefits in SCA and SCT populations, he said.
Moving forward, Dr. Liem noted that guidelines from the NCAA and National Athletic Trainers’ Association offer insight into exercise best practices in SCT. They’re designed to promote acclimation during training, access to fluids, and prompt recognition of symptoms of heat-related illness and a condition known as “exercise collapse associated with sickle trait.”
However, there are no guidelines for exercise in SCA and it’s not helpful to let patients set limits on themselves based on the symptoms they experience, he said.
Dr. Liem reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM ASH 2018
Tom Brokaw opens up on surviving multiple myeloma
SAN DIEGO – Tom Brokaw has devoted his life to openness and transparency. But he kept mum about a big story that only he could fully tell – his diagnosis of multiple myeloma. He alerted his bosses and a few loved ones but otherwise kept his condition secret even as he struggled to walk and navigate stairs.
“I didn’t want to be Tom Brokaw, cancer victim,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. But he did decide to go public in a big way and he said he doesn’t regret it. “I’m kind of the multiple myeloma poster boy.”
Since opening up about myeloma, “I have learned more about life and medicine, and kindness and the extraordinary strength of this country, than I have in all my other experiences,” he said. “I can say, oddly enough, at age 78 about to be 79, that having multiple myeloma has been a kind of privilege for me.”
Mr. Brokaw is best known as the longtime anchor of “NBC Nightly News” and author of “The Greatest Generation,” about the American experience in World War II. He was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2013 and revealed his condition publicly in 2014.
In 2016, he described his treatment in a New York Times commentary: “...three years of chemotherapy, a spinal operation that cost me three inches of height, monthly infusions of bone supplements, and drugs to prevent respiratory infection.” He also described fatigue, bone damage, and a 24-pill-a-day regimen.
In his presentation at ASH, Mr. Brokaw detailed the adjustment of having to slow down after an active life as a cyclist and outdoorsman. “I’m not going to go down the street with a cane. My birth certificate says I’m 78 years old, but I still think I’m 38, anchoring the news.”
“There was so much concentration on the disease itself that I don’t think I got as much as I needed regarding the radiant effects.”
At one point, he fell while running with his dog, and developed an infection in a cavity in his elbow. Still, he refused to cancel a flight to Washington, D.C., for an interview with the secretary of defense. The infection got worse, soaking his shirt with leakage, and when he returned “they slammed me into intensive care.”
He got a stern instruction that “you can’t do this anymore,” and he responded with an “ohh-kay.”
“It’s the anchorman in me. You get used to doing what you want to do. But I have to be much more careful about what I do and when I do it,” he said.
Now, Mr. Brokaw still struggles to follow advice about risks such as flying. But he remains active as a speaker, a special correspondent for NBC, and an author. “By and large,” he said, “I’m getting along OK. I’m grateful for that.”
SAN DIEGO – Tom Brokaw has devoted his life to openness and transparency. But he kept mum about a big story that only he could fully tell – his diagnosis of multiple myeloma. He alerted his bosses and a few loved ones but otherwise kept his condition secret even as he struggled to walk and navigate stairs.
“I didn’t want to be Tom Brokaw, cancer victim,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. But he did decide to go public in a big way and he said he doesn’t regret it. “I’m kind of the multiple myeloma poster boy.”
Since opening up about myeloma, “I have learned more about life and medicine, and kindness and the extraordinary strength of this country, than I have in all my other experiences,” he said. “I can say, oddly enough, at age 78 about to be 79, that having multiple myeloma has been a kind of privilege for me.”
Mr. Brokaw is best known as the longtime anchor of “NBC Nightly News” and author of “The Greatest Generation,” about the American experience in World War II. He was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2013 and revealed his condition publicly in 2014.
In 2016, he described his treatment in a New York Times commentary: “...three years of chemotherapy, a spinal operation that cost me three inches of height, monthly infusions of bone supplements, and drugs to prevent respiratory infection.” He also described fatigue, bone damage, and a 24-pill-a-day regimen.
In his presentation at ASH, Mr. Brokaw detailed the adjustment of having to slow down after an active life as a cyclist and outdoorsman. “I’m not going to go down the street with a cane. My birth certificate says I’m 78 years old, but I still think I’m 38, anchoring the news.”
“There was so much concentration on the disease itself that I don’t think I got as much as I needed regarding the radiant effects.”
At one point, he fell while running with his dog, and developed an infection in a cavity in his elbow. Still, he refused to cancel a flight to Washington, D.C., for an interview with the secretary of defense. The infection got worse, soaking his shirt with leakage, and when he returned “they slammed me into intensive care.”
He got a stern instruction that “you can’t do this anymore,” and he responded with an “ohh-kay.”
“It’s the anchorman in me. You get used to doing what you want to do. But I have to be much more careful about what I do and when I do it,” he said.
Now, Mr. Brokaw still struggles to follow advice about risks such as flying. But he remains active as a speaker, a special correspondent for NBC, and an author. “By and large,” he said, “I’m getting along OK. I’m grateful for that.”
SAN DIEGO – Tom Brokaw has devoted his life to openness and transparency. But he kept mum about a big story that only he could fully tell – his diagnosis of multiple myeloma. He alerted his bosses and a few loved ones but otherwise kept his condition secret even as he struggled to walk and navigate stairs.
“I didn’t want to be Tom Brokaw, cancer victim,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. But he did decide to go public in a big way and he said he doesn’t regret it. “I’m kind of the multiple myeloma poster boy.”
Since opening up about myeloma, “I have learned more about life and medicine, and kindness and the extraordinary strength of this country, than I have in all my other experiences,” he said. “I can say, oddly enough, at age 78 about to be 79, that having multiple myeloma has been a kind of privilege for me.”
Mr. Brokaw is best known as the longtime anchor of “NBC Nightly News” and author of “The Greatest Generation,” about the American experience in World War II. He was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2013 and revealed his condition publicly in 2014.
In 2016, he described his treatment in a New York Times commentary: “...three years of chemotherapy, a spinal operation that cost me three inches of height, monthly infusions of bone supplements, and drugs to prevent respiratory infection.” He also described fatigue, bone damage, and a 24-pill-a-day regimen.
In his presentation at ASH, Mr. Brokaw detailed the adjustment of having to slow down after an active life as a cyclist and outdoorsman. “I’m not going to go down the street with a cane. My birth certificate says I’m 78 years old, but I still think I’m 38, anchoring the news.”
“There was so much concentration on the disease itself that I don’t think I got as much as I needed regarding the radiant effects.”
At one point, he fell while running with his dog, and developed an infection in a cavity in his elbow. Still, he refused to cancel a flight to Washington, D.C., for an interview with the secretary of defense. The infection got worse, soaking his shirt with leakage, and when he returned “they slammed me into intensive care.”
He got a stern instruction that “you can’t do this anymore,” and he responded with an “ohh-kay.”
“It’s the anchorman in me. You get used to doing what you want to do. But I have to be much more careful about what I do and when I do it,” he said.
Now, Mr. Brokaw still struggles to follow advice about risks such as flying. But he remains active as a speaker, a special correspondent for NBC, and an author. “By and large,” he said, “I’m getting along OK. I’m grateful for that.”
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM ASH 2018
Potty pathogens in space, fundus photos, and ethnic microbiomes
The earth is not enough
Earthly competitors have proved to be unworthy, so this week, Bacteria vs. the World visits the International Space Station, which – and we double-checked this – is in space. It’s a pretty exclusive location, and admission is by invitation only. Unless, of, course, you happen to be the ultimate hitchhiker. Four samples taken from the toilet of the ISS (and one from a piece of exercise equipment) were found to contain unknown strains of antibiotic-resistant Enterobacter bugandensis, investigators reported (BMC Microbiol. 2018 Nov 23;18[1]:175).
These bacterial stowaways were not virulent, lead author Nitin Singh, PhD, of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory said in a separate statement. But an analysis conducted by the team “reveals that the ISS isolates have a 79% probability of being a human pathogen.”
So, what does this mean for future space exploration? Cue the “Star Trek” music: “Space … the final frontier. These are the voyages of the bacterial transport ship Enterprise.”
Putting the FUN in fundus photos
You just got even more dependent on your phone: The American Academy of Opthalmology has published guidelines on how to use smartphones to take fundus photography, a.k.a. photographs of the back of the eye.
Advancement in smartphone optical quality has turned them into an important clinical tool, especially for specialists in low-funded or rural areas who don’t have access to imaging systems. Doctors can purchase special lenses and phone software to take these photos and then can easily upload the images to their Instagram accounts. (Even doctors need likes.)
An eye hospital in India has taken fundus accessibility a step further and posted a video on YouTube showing how to make a functional fundus camera that costs only 100 rupees. All you need in some cardboard, a water bottle, and a lens. “MacGyver: Chennai Edition.”
I feel it in my gut
Whoever said “inside, we’re all the same” clearly wasn’t considering the gut. A study from Vanderbilt University comprising 1,700 American subjects found that differences in gut microbiomes are most consistently linked with ethnicity. Vanderbilt biologist Seth Bordenstein emphasized how changing the gut microbiome can lead to curing illness but that it’s imperative that medical professionals understand how the gut differs across ethnicities.
Researchers found 12 types of bacteria that vary in abundancy by ethnicity. No comment on whether this was linked to differences in cuisine, but this writer fervently hopes new research arrives proving that tacos produce the healthiest gut microbiome.
F-bombing blood cancer
Call it a tale of two Toms.
TV newsman Tom Brokaw, who has multiple myeloma, says he’s become the “poster boy” for blood cancer. At first, though, he kept his diagnosis secret from just about everyone. But occasionally he let his emotions get the best of him. Especially when he’d see a Manhattan bus stop ad spotlighting the chiseled body of another Tom: the quarterback named Brady.
As he explained in a presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, he found it harder to get around because of back problems, which are common in multiple myeloma. As a result, he couldn’t manage to get to the office.
Still, “every day I’d force myself to leave the walker at home,” he recalled. “In that cold and sleety fall, I’d walk half a block to the coffee shop to get a bagel. There was this enormous new bus stop, with an animated advertisement board. Looking right at me was Tom Brady, advertising Ugg boots. I’d look down 79th Street at every inch of Tom Brady, and all the little old ladies were mooning over him as they were getting on the bus.”
Brokaw knew just what to do to make himself feel better. “I’d hobble over and look at him and drop the F-bomb on him every morning. Frankly, it was therapeutic for me.”
Later, he met the New England Patriots quarterback and told him the story, replacing “F-bomb” with the real word. “He had this little posse with him, and they roared. They said nobody talks to Tom like that.”
Brokaw still resists pleas to slow down from concerned loved ones, such as his emergency physician daughter. “My birth certificate says I’m 78 years old,” he said, “but I still think I’m 38 anchoring the news.” And still tossing tight-spiral F-bombs at cancer and gridiron G.O.A.T.s alike.
The earth is not enough
Earthly competitors have proved to be unworthy, so this week, Bacteria vs. the World visits the International Space Station, which – and we double-checked this – is in space. It’s a pretty exclusive location, and admission is by invitation only. Unless, of, course, you happen to be the ultimate hitchhiker. Four samples taken from the toilet of the ISS (and one from a piece of exercise equipment) were found to contain unknown strains of antibiotic-resistant Enterobacter bugandensis, investigators reported (BMC Microbiol. 2018 Nov 23;18[1]:175).
These bacterial stowaways were not virulent, lead author Nitin Singh, PhD, of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory said in a separate statement. But an analysis conducted by the team “reveals that the ISS isolates have a 79% probability of being a human pathogen.”
So, what does this mean for future space exploration? Cue the “Star Trek” music: “Space … the final frontier. These are the voyages of the bacterial transport ship Enterprise.”
Putting the FUN in fundus photos
You just got even more dependent on your phone: The American Academy of Opthalmology has published guidelines on how to use smartphones to take fundus photography, a.k.a. photographs of the back of the eye.
Advancement in smartphone optical quality has turned them into an important clinical tool, especially for specialists in low-funded or rural areas who don’t have access to imaging systems. Doctors can purchase special lenses and phone software to take these photos and then can easily upload the images to their Instagram accounts. (Even doctors need likes.)
An eye hospital in India has taken fundus accessibility a step further and posted a video on YouTube showing how to make a functional fundus camera that costs only 100 rupees. All you need in some cardboard, a water bottle, and a lens. “MacGyver: Chennai Edition.”
I feel it in my gut
Whoever said “inside, we’re all the same” clearly wasn’t considering the gut. A study from Vanderbilt University comprising 1,700 American subjects found that differences in gut microbiomes are most consistently linked with ethnicity. Vanderbilt biologist Seth Bordenstein emphasized how changing the gut microbiome can lead to curing illness but that it’s imperative that medical professionals understand how the gut differs across ethnicities.
Researchers found 12 types of bacteria that vary in abundancy by ethnicity. No comment on whether this was linked to differences in cuisine, but this writer fervently hopes new research arrives proving that tacos produce the healthiest gut microbiome.
F-bombing blood cancer
Call it a tale of two Toms.
TV newsman Tom Brokaw, who has multiple myeloma, says he’s become the “poster boy” for blood cancer. At first, though, he kept his diagnosis secret from just about everyone. But occasionally he let his emotions get the best of him. Especially when he’d see a Manhattan bus stop ad spotlighting the chiseled body of another Tom: the quarterback named Brady.
As he explained in a presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, he found it harder to get around because of back problems, which are common in multiple myeloma. As a result, he couldn’t manage to get to the office.
Still, “every day I’d force myself to leave the walker at home,” he recalled. “In that cold and sleety fall, I’d walk half a block to the coffee shop to get a bagel. There was this enormous new bus stop, with an animated advertisement board. Looking right at me was Tom Brady, advertising Ugg boots. I’d look down 79th Street at every inch of Tom Brady, and all the little old ladies were mooning over him as they were getting on the bus.”
Brokaw knew just what to do to make himself feel better. “I’d hobble over and look at him and drop the F-bomb on him every morning. Frankly, it was therapeutic for me.”
Later, he met the New England Patriots quarterback and told him the story, replacing “F-bomb” with the real word. “He had this little posse with him, and they roared. They said nobody talks to Tom like that.”
Brokaw still resists pleas to slow down from concerned loved ones, such as his emergency physician daughter. “My birth certificate says I’m 78 years old,” he said, “but I still think I’m 38 anchoring the news.” And still tossing tight-spiral F-bombs at cancer and gridiron G.O.A.T.s alike.
The earth is not enough
Earthly competitors have proved to be unworthy, so this week, Bacteria vs. the World visits the International Space Station, which – and we double-checked this – is in space. It’s a pretty exclusive location, and admission is by invitation only. Unless, of, course, you happen to be the ultimate hitchhiker. Four samples taken from the toilet of the ISS (and one from a piece of exercise equipment) were found to contain unknown strains of antibiotic-resistant Enterobacter bugandensis, investigators reported (BMC Microbiol. 2018 Nov 23;18[1]:175).
These bacterial stowaways were not virulent, lead author Nitin Singh, PhD, of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory said in a separate statement. But an analysis conducted by the team “reveals that the ISS isolates have a 79% probability of being a human pathogen.”
So, what does this mean for future space exploration? Cue the “Star Trek” music: “Space … the final frontier. These are the voyages of the bacterial transport ship Enterprise.”
Putting the FUN in fundus photos
You just got even more dependent on your phone: The American Academy of Opthalmology has published guidelines on how to use smartphones to take fundus photography, a.k.a. photographs of the back of the eye.
Advancement in smartphone optical quality has turned them into an important clinical tool, especially for specialists in low-funded or rural areas who don’t have access to imaging systems. Doctors can purchase special lenses and phone software to take these photos and then can easily upload the images to their Instagram accounts. (Even doctors need likes.)
An eye hospital in India has taken fundus accessibility a step further and posted a video on YouTube showing how to make a functional fundus camera that costs only 100 rupees. All you need in some cardboard, a water bottle, and a lens. “MacGyver: Chennai Edition.”
I feel it in my gut
Whoever said “inside, we’re all the same” clearly wasn’t considering the gut. A study from Vanderbilt University comprising 1,700 American subjects found that differences in gut microbiomes are most consistently linked with ethnicity. Vanderbilt biologist Seth Bordenstein emphasized how changing the gut microbiome can lead to curing illness but that it’s imperative that medical professionals understand how the gut differs across ethnicities.
Researchers found 12 types of bacteria that vary in abundancy by ethnicity. No comment on whether this was linked to differences in cuisine, but this writer fervently hopes new research arrives proving that tacos produce the healthiest gut microbiome.
F-bombing blood cancer
Call it a tale of two Toms.
TV newsman Tom Brokaw, who has multiple myeloma, says he’s become the “poster boy” for blood cancer. At first, though, he kept his diagnosis secret from just about everyone. But occasionally he let his emotions get the best of him. Especially when he’d see a Manhattan bus stop ad spotlighting the chiseled body of another Tom: the quarterback named Brady.
As he explained in a presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, he found it harder to get around because of back problems, which are common in multiple myeloma. As a result, he couldn’t manage to get to the office.
Still, “every day I’d force myself to leave the walker at home,” he recalled. “In that cold and sleety fall, I’d walk half a block to the coffee shop to get a bagel. There was this enormous new bus stop, with an animated advertisement board. Looking right at me was Tom Brady, advertising Ugg boots. I’d look down 79th Street at every inch of Tom Brady, and all the little old ladies were mooning over him as they were getting on the bus.”
Brokaw knew just what to do to make himself feel better. “I’d hobble over and look at him and drop the F-bomb on him every morning. Frankly, it was therapeutic for me.”
Later, he met the New England Patriots quarterback and told him the story, replacing “F-bomb” with the real word. “He had this little posse with him, and they roared. They said nobody talks to Tom like that.”
Brokaw still resists pleas to slow down from concerned loved ones, such as his emergency physician daughter. “My birth certificate says I’m 78 years old,” he said, “but I still think I’m 38 anchoring the news.” And still tossing tight-spiral F-bombs at cancer and gridiron G.O.A.T.s alike.
