Image Quizzes

FHM is a rare phenotype of migraine with aura with a characteristic presentation of motor aura. Motor aura presents as unilateral muscle weakness that tends to be felt first in the hands or arm and may spread to the face. To date, three distinct types have been identified by mutations in one of three genes. Type 1 is the most common and is associated with mutations in the gene CACNA1A. Mutations in ATP1A2 underlie type 2 FHM, and mutations in SCN1A underlie type 3 FHM.

FHM is distinguished from other hemiplegic migraine by family history of one or more affected first- or second-degree relatives. Genetic studies have shown FHM to have autosomal dominant inheritance. From half to three quarters of patients with FHM will have one of the more than 30 identified mutations on CACNA1A that diagnose type 1 FHM. These mutations affect transmission of glutamate in the neurons and neuronal reactions, increasing the susceptibility to cortical spreading depression associated with migraine. Mutations in ATP1A2 are found in about 20% of patients with FHM (type 2). More than 80 individual mutations have been identified, which alter sodium-potassium metabolism in neurons. About 5% of patients have type 3 FHM, associated with mutations in SCN1A that create gain of function or loss of function in neuronal voltage-gated sodium channels. Studies of other possible genes and mutations in relation to FHM, including PRRT2, are ongoing, but to date the associations are not clearly established. 

Patients with FHM may also report sensory symptoms, visual disturbances, or aphasia. FHM generally affects people in their teens and twenties (women more than men) and has an estimated prevalence of 0.003% of the population. On average, patients report having two to three attacks per year, and some patients go for extended periods without a recurrent attack. Motor aura may occur on the same or opposite side of the body as headache and may alternate affected sides with each attack. Differential diagnoses that should be ruled out include transient ischemic attacks, infections (eg, meningitis, encephalitis), tumors, seizures, other inherited disorders, and metabolic issues.

Like other forms of migraine with aura, FHM is treated with abortive and/or preventive medications. Given the rarity of FHM, there are few studies specifically in families with this phenotype. Patients should be counseled on trigger avoidance to limit exposure. Acute treatment includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and other nonopioid pain relievers. The class of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists (rimegepant, ubrogepant, zavegepant) may be considered. However, with FHM, medications associated with ischemia must be avoided. As such, triptans and ergotamines are generally contraindicated, as are beta-blockers. Patients with FHM and more frequent or severe attacks may be considered for preventive treatment to improve function and quality of life and avoid reliance on acute therapies. Options include CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), administered subcutaneously or by intravenous infusion, and onabotulinumtoxinA injection. Current CGRP mAbs include eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab. Combined CGRP mAb therapy with onabotulinumtoxinA may be an effective alternative for patients with resistant FHM. 

Heidi Moawad, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Education, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Heidi Moawad, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

FHM is a rare phenotype of migraine with aura with a characteristic presentation of motor aura. Motor aura presents as unilateral muscle weakness that tends to be felt first in the hands or arm and may spread to the face. To date, three distinct types have been identified by mutations in one of three genes. Type 1 is the most common and is associated with mutations in the gene CACNA1A. Mutations in ATP1A2 underlie type 2 FHM, and mutations in SCN1A underlie type 3 FHM.

FHM is distinguished from other hemiplegic migraine by family history of one or more affected first- or second-degree relatives. Genetic studies have shown FHM to have autosomal dominant inheritance. From half to three quarters of patients with FHM will have one of the more than 30 identified mutations on CACNA1A that diagnose type 1 FHM. These mutations affect transmission of glutamate in the neurons and neuronal reactions, increasing the susceptibility to cortical spreading depression associated with migraine. Mutations in ATP1A2 are found in about 20% of patients with FHM (type 2). More than 80 individual mutations have been identified, which alter sodium-potassium metabolism in neurons. About 5% of patients have type 3 FHM, associated with mutations in SCN1A that create gain of function or loss of function in neuronal voltage-gated sodium channels. Studies of other possible genes and mutations in relation to FHM, including PRRT2, are ongoing, but to date the associations are not clearly established. 

Patients with FHM may also report sensory symptoms, visual disturbances, or aphasia. FHM generally affects people in their teens and twenties (women more than men) and has an estimated prevalence of 0.003% of the population. On average, patients report having two to three attacks per year, and some patients go for extended periods without a recurrent attack. Motor aura may occur on the same or opposite side of the body as headache and may alternate affected sides with each attack. Differential diagnoses that should be ruled out include transient ischemic attacks, infections (eg, meningitis, encephalitis), tumors, seizures, other inherited disorders, and metabolic issues.

Like other forms of migraine with aura, FHM is treated with abortive and/or preventive medications. Given the rarity of FHM, there are few studies specifically in families with this phenotype. Patients should be counseled on trigger avoidance to limit exposure. Acute treatment includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and other nonopioid pain relievers. The class of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists (rimegepant, ubrogepant, zavegepant) may be considered. However, with FHM, medications associated with ischemia must be avoided. As such, triptans and ergotamines are generally contraindicated, as are beta-blockers. Patients with FHM and more frequent or severe attacks may be considered for preventive treatment to improve function and quality of life and avoid reliance on acute therapies. Options include CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), administered subcutaneously or by intravenous infusion, and onabotulinumtoxinA injection. Current CGRP mAbs include eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab. Combined CGRP mAb therapy with onabotulinumtoxinA may be an effective alternative for patients with resistant FHM. 

Heidi Moawad, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Education, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Heidi Moawad, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

FHM is a rare phenotype of migraine with aura with a characteristic presentation of motor aura. Motor aura presents as unilateral muscle weakness that tends to be felt first in the hands or arm and may spread to the face. To date, three distinct types have been identified by mutations in one of three genes. Type 1 is the most common and is associated with mutations in the gene CACNA1A. Mutations in ATP1A2 underlie type 2 FHM, and mutations in SCN1A underlie type 3 FHM.

FHM is distinguished from other hemiplegic migraine by family history of one or more affected first- or second-degree relatives. Genetic studies have shown FHM to have autosomal dominant inheritance. From half to three quarters of patients with FHM will have one of the more than 30 identified mutations on CACNA1A that diagnose type 1 FHM. These mutations affect transmission of glutamate in the neurons and neuronal reactions, increasing the susceptibility to cortical spreading depression associated with migraine. Mutations in ATP1A2 are found in about 20% of patients with FHM (type 2). More than 80 individual mutations have been identified, which alter sodium-potassium metabolism in neurons. About 5% of patients have type 3 FHM, associated with mutations in SCN1A that create gain of function or loss of function in neuronal voltage-gated sodium channels. Studies of other possible genes and mutations in relation to FHM, including PRRT2, are ongoing, but to date the associations are not clearly established. 

Patients with FHM may also report sensory symptoms, visual disturbances, or aphasia. FHM generally affects people in their teens and twenties (women more than men) and has an estimated prevalence of 0.003% of the population. On average, patients report having two to three attacks per year, and some patients go for extended periods without a recurrent attack. Motor aura may occur on the same or opposite side of the body as headache and may alternate affected sides with each attack. Differential diagnoses that should be ruled out include transient ischemic attacks, infections (eg, meningitis, encephalitis), tumors, seizures, other inherited disorders, and metabolic issues.

Like other forms of migraine with aura, FHM is treated with abortive and/or preventive medications. Given the rarity of FHM, there are few studies specifically in families with this phenotype. Patients should be counseled on trigger avoidance to limit exposure. Acute treatment includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and other nonopioid pain relievers. The class of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists (rimegepant, ubrogepant, zavegepant) may be considered. However, with FHM, medications associated with ischemia must be avoided. As such, triptans and ergotamines are generally contraindicated, as are beta-blockers. Patients with FHM and more frequent or severe attacks may be considered for preventive treatment to improve function and quality of life and avoid reliance on acute therapies. Options include CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), administered subcutaneously or by intravenous infusion, and onabotulinumtoxinA injection. Current CGRP mAbs include eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab. Combined CGRP mAb therapy with onabotulinumtoxinA may be an effective alternative for patients with resistant FHM. 

Heidi Moawad, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Education, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Heidi Moawad, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Overall, persons with schizophrenia are more likely than the general population to be overweight and have cardiovascular risk factors before starting treatment with antipsychotics, and such treatment generally worsens these measures. Weight gain and associated morbidity and mortality are common side effects of antipsychotic medications. Olanzapine is associated with significant weight gain of 7% or more, higher than other second-generation antipsychotics. Olanzapine treatment is the major contributor to this patient's additional weight gain over the past 2 years. This added weight has translated to excess wear and tear on her joints, leading to evidence of osteoarthritis. Treatment with olanzapine is also independently associated with detrimental changes in cardiometabolic parameters.

Interventions to prevent or mitigate weight gain with antipsychotics are limited. In general, the American Psychiatric Association does not recommend switching antipsychotics for patients whose schizophrenia is well managed. However, there is increasing evidence that metformin may have a role in mitigating weight gain as well as beneficially modifying cardiometabolic factors in patients with schizophrenia being treated with olanzapine. A systematic review of emerging evidence with metformin in patients with schizophrenia suggests that metformin may also improve some cognitive symptoms of the illness, although further research is needed. The randomized, double-blind MELIA trial of metformin plus lifestyle intervention in antipsychotic-induced weight gain is ongoing. Starting metformin as a preventive measure at the same time as antipsychotic therapy may help to limit excess weight gain. 

Research continues on the potential benefit of adding weight loss medications, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, to antipsychotics. Daily liraglutide is most widely studied, but a published case series with weekly semaglutide also demonstrated weight loss in this setting. Liraglutide also has shown beneficial cardiometabolic effects in patients using antipsychotic medications. More studies of these drugs and of GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide agonists are needed to elucidate the optimal use of these therapies for patients with schizophrenia.

There are few other effective ways to mitigate weight gain with olanzapine. Patients should be counseled on nutrition and lifestyle modifications. Evidence supports improvement with structured lifestyle modifications across a range of patients with less severe mental health issues, and structured programs combined with motivational interviewing were associated with reductions in antipsychotic-induced weight gain in patients with severe mental illness. As with any patient with obesity, however, the success of lifestyle modifications is heavily dependent on the individual's ability and motivation to comply with recommended interventions. 

Nonpharmacologic interventions to address joint pain include heat or cold compresses, physical therapy, and strength and resistance training to improve the strength of muscles supporting the joints. If these measures are ineffective, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including ibuprofen, naproxen, meloxicam, diclofenac, or celecoxib may be used with regular follow-up to assess cardiovascular and gastrointestinal health. Topical NSAIDs also may be useful. For more intractable joint pain, options include injecting a corticosteroid or sodium hyaluronate into the affected joints or joint replacement. 

Carolyn Newberry, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Director of GI Nutrition, Innovative Center for Health and Nutrition in Gastroenterology (ICHANGE), Division of Gastroenterology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY.

Disclosure: Carolyn Newberry, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:

Serve(d) as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: Baster International; InBody.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Overall, persons with schizophrenia are more likely than the general population to be overweight and have cardiovascular risk factors before starting treatment with antipsychotics, and such treatment generally worsens these measures. Weight gain and associated morbidity and mortality are common side effects of antipsychotic medications. Olanzapine is associated with significant weight gain of 7% or more, higher than other second-generation antipsychotics. Olanzapine treatment is the major contributor to this patient's additional weight gain over the past 2 years. This added weight has translated to excess wear and tear on her joints, leading to evidence of osteoarthritis. Treatment with olanzapine is also independently associated with detrimental changes in cardiometabolic parameters.

Interventions to prevent or mitigate weight gain with antipsychotics are limited. In general, the American Psychiatric Association does not recommend switching antipsychotics for patients whose schizophrenia is well managed. However, there is increasing evidence that metformin may have a role in mitigating weight gain as well as beneficially modifying cardiometabolic factors in patients with schizophrenia being treated with olanzapine. A systematic review of emerging evidence with metformin in patients with schizophrenia suggests that metformin may also improve some cognitive symptoms of the illness, although further research is needed. The randomized, double-blind MELIA trial of metformin plus lifestyle intervention in antipsychotic-induced weight gain is ongoing. Starting metformin as a preventive measure at the same time as antipsychotic therapy may help to limit excess weight gain. 

Research continues on the potential benefit of adding weight loss medications, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, to antipsychotics. Daily liraglutide is most widely studied, but a published case series with weekly semaglutide also demonstrated weight loss in this setting. Liraglutide also has shown beneficial cardiometabolic effects in patients using antipsychotic medications. More studies of these drugs and of GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide agonists are needed to elucidate the optimal use of these therapies for patients with schizophrenia.

There are few other effective ways to mitigate weight gain with olanzapine. Patients should be counseled on nutrition and lifestyle modifications. Evidence supports improvement with structured lifestyle modifications across a range of patients with less severe mental health issues, and structured programs combined with motivational interviewing were associated with reductions in antipsychotic-induced weight gain in patients with severe mental illness. As with any patient with obesity, however, the success of lifestyle modifications is heavily dependent on the individual's ability and motivation to comply with recommended interventions. 

Nonpharmacologic interventions to address joint pain include heat or cold compresses, physical therapy, and strength and resistance training to improve the strength of muscles supporting the joints. If these measures are ineffective, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including ibuprofen, naproxen, meloxicam, diclofenac, or celecoxib may be used with regular follow-up to assess cardiovascular and gastrointestinal health. Topical NSAIDs also may be useful. For more intractable joint pain, options include injecting a corticosteroid or sodium hyaluronate into the affected joints or joint replacement. 

Carolyn Newberry, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Director of GI Nutrition, Innovative Center for Health and Nutrition in Gastroenterology (ICHANGE), Division of Gastroenterology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY.

Disclosure: Carolyn Newberry, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:

Serve(d) as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: Baster International; InBody.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Overall, persons with schizophrenia are more likely than the general population to be overweight and have cardiovascular risk factors before starting treatment with antipsychotics, and such treatment generally worsens these measures. Weight gain and associated morbidity and mortality are common side effects of antipsychotic medications. Olanzapine is associated with significant weight gain of 7% or more, higher than other second-generation antipsychotics. Olanzapine treatment is the major contributor to this patient's additional weight gain over the past 2 years. This added weight has translated to excess wear and tear on her joints, leading to evidence of osteoarthritis. Treatment with olanzapine is also independently associated with detrimental changes in cardiometabolic parameters.

Interventions to prevent or mitigate weight gain with antipsychotics are limited. In general, the American Psychiatric Association does not recommend switching antipsychotics for patients whose schizophrenia is well managed. However, there is increasing evidence that metformin may have a role in mitigating weight gain as well as beneficially modifying cardiometabolic factors in patients with schizophrenia being treated with olanzapine. A systematic review of emerging evidence with metformin in patients with schizophrenia suggests that metformin may also improve some cognitive symptoms of the illness, although further research is needed. The randomized, double-blind MELIA trial of metformin plus lifestyle intervention in antipsychotic-induced weight gain is ongoing. Starting metformin as a preventive measure at the same time as antipsychotic therapy may help to limit excess weight gain. 

Research continues on the potential benefit of adding weight loss medications, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, to antipsychotics. Daily liraglutide is most widely studied, but a published case series with weekly semaglutide also demonstrated weight loss in this setting. Liraglutide also has shown beneficial cardiometabolic effects in patients using antipsychotic medications. More studies of these drugs and of GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide agonists are needed to elucidate the optimal use of these therapies for patients with schizophrenia.

There are few other effective ways to mitigate weight gain with olanzapine. Patients should be counseled on nutrition and lifestyle modifications. Evidence supports improvement with structured lifestyle modifications across a range of patients with less severe mental health issues, and structured programs combined with motivational interviewing were associated with reductions in antipsychotic-induced weight gain in patients with severe mental illness. As with any patient with obesity, however, the success of lifestyle modifications is heavily dependent on the individual's ability and motivation to comply with recommended interventions. 

Nonpharmacologic interventions to address joint pain include heat or cold compresses, physical therapy, and strength and resistance training to improve the strength of muscles supporting the joints. If these measures are ineffective, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including ibuprofen, naproxen, meloxicam, diclofenac, or celecoxib may be used with regular follow-up to assess cardiovascular and gastrointestinal health. Topical NSAIDs also may be useful. For more intractable joint pain, options include injecting a corticosteroid or sodium hyaluronate into the affected joints or joint replacement. 

Carolyn Newberry, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Director of GI Nutrition, Innovative Center for Health and Nutrition in Gastroenterology (ICHANGE), Division of Gastroenterology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY.

Disclosure: Carolyn Newberry, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:

Serve(d) as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: Baster International; InBody.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Migraine is a form of recurrent headache that can present as migraine with aura or migraine without aura, with the latter being the most common form. As in this patient, migraine without aura is a chronic form of headache of moderate to severe intensity that usually lasts for several hours but rarely may persist for up to 3 days. Headache pain is unilateral and often aggravated by triggers such as routine physical activity. The American Headache Society diagnostic criteria for migraine without aura include having symptoms of nausea and/or hypersensitivity to light or sound. This patient also described symptoms typical of the prodromal phase of migraine, which include yawning, temperature control, excessive thirst, and mood swings.

Patients who have migraine with aura also have unilateral headache pain of several hours' duration but experience visual (eg, dots or flashes) or sensory (prickly sensation on skin) symptoms, or may have brief difficulty with speech or motor function. These aura symptoms generally last 5 to 60 minutes before abating. 

The worldwide impact of migraine potentially reaches a billion individuals. Its prevalence is second only to tension-type headaches. Migraine occurs in patients of all ages and affects women at a rate two to three times higher than in men. Prevalence appears to peak in the third and fourth decades of life and tends to be lower among older adults. Migraine also has a negative effect on patients' work, school, or social lives, and is associated with increased rates of depression and anxiety in adults. For patients who are prone to migraines, potential triggers include some foods and beverages (including those that contain caffeine and alcohol), menstrual cycles in women, exposure to strobing or bright lights or loud sounds, stressful situations, extra physical activity, and too much or too little sleep. 

Migraine is a clinical diagnosis based on number of headaches (five or more episodes) plus two or more of the characteristic signs (unilateral, throbbing pain, pain intensity of ≥ 5 on a 10-point scale, and pain aggravated by routine physical motion, such as climbing stairs or bending over) plus nausea and/or photosensitivity or phonosensitivity. Prodrome symptoms are reported by about 70% of adult patients. Diagnosis rarely requires neuroimaging; however, before prescribing medication, a complete lab and metabolic workup should be done.

Management of migraine without aura includes acute and preventive interventions. Acute interventions cited by the American Headache Society include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen for mild pain, and migraine-specific therapies such as the triptans, ergotamine derivatives, gepants (rimegepant, ubrogepant), and lasmiditan. Because response to any of these therapies will differ among patients with migraine, shared decision-making with patients about benefits and potential side effects is necessary and should include flexibility to change therapy if needed. 

Preventive therapy should be offered to patients experiencing six or more migraines a month (regardless of impairment) and those, like this patient, with three or more migraines a month that significantly impair daily activities. Preventive therapy can be considered for those with fewer monthly episodes, depending on the degree of impairment. Oral preventive therapies with established efficacy include candesartan, certain beta-blockers, topiramate, and valproate. Parenteral monoclonal antibodies that inhibit calcitonin gene-related peptide activity (eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab) and onabotulinumtoxinA may be considered if oral therapies provide inadequate prevention. 

Tension-type headache is the most common form of primary headache. These headaches are bilateral and characterized by a pressing or dull sensation that is often mild in intensity. They are different from migraine in that they occur infrequently, lack sensory symptoms, and generally are of shorter duration (30 minutes to 24 hours). Fasting-related headache is characterized by diffuse, nonpulsating pain and is relieved with food. 

Heidi Moawad, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Education, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Heidi Moawad, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
 

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.
 

Migraine is a form of recurrent headache that can present as migraine with aura or migraine without aura, with the latter being the most common form. As in this patient, migraine without aura is a chronic form of headache of moderate to severe intensity that usually lasts for several hours but rarely may persist for up to 3 days. Headache pain is unilateral and often aggravated by triggers such as routine physical activity. The American Headache Society diagnostic criteria for migraine without aura include having symptoms of nausea and/or hypersensitivity to light or sound. This patient also described symptoms typical of the prodromal phase of migraine, which include yawning, temperature control, excessive thirst, and mood swings.

Patients who have migraine with aura also have unilateral headache pain of several hours' duration but experience visual (eg, dots or flashes) or sensory (prickly sensation on skin) symptoms, or may have brief difficulty with speech or motor function. These aura symptoms generally last 5 to 60 minutes before abating. 

The worldwide impact of migraine potentially reaches a billion individuals. Its prevalence is second only to tension-type headaches. Migraine occurs in patients of all ages and affects women at a rate two to three times higher than in men. Prevalence appears to peak in the third and fourth decades of life and tends to be lower among older adults. Migraine also has a negative effect on patients' work, school, or social lives, and is associated with increased rates of depression and anxiety in adults. For patients who are prone to migraines, potential triggers include some foods and beverages (including those that contain caffeine and alcohol), menstrual cycles in women, exposure to strobing or bright lights or loud sounds, stressful situations, extra physical activity, and too much or too little sleep. 

Migraine is a clinical diagnosis based on number of headaches (five or more episodes) plus two or more of the characteristic signs (unilateral, throbbing pain, pain intensity of ≥ 5 on a 10-point scale, and pain aggravated by routine physical motion, such as climbing stairs or bending over) plus nausea and/or photosensitivity or phonosensitivity. Prodrome symptoms are reported by about 70% of adult patients. Diagnosis rarely requires neuroimaging; however, before prescribing medication, a complete lab and metabolic workup should be done.

Management of migraine without aura includes acute and preventive interventions. Acute interventions cited by the American Headache Society include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen for mild pain, and migraine-specific therapies such as the triptans, ergotamine derivatives, gepants (rimegepant, ubrogepant), and lasmiditan. Because response to any of these therapies will differ among patients with migraine, shared decision-making with patients about benefits and potential side effects is necessary and should include flexibility to change therapy if needed. 

Preventive therapy should be offered to patients experiencing six or more migraines a month (regardless of impairment) and those, like this patient, with three or more migraines a month that significantly impair daily activities. Preventive therapy can be considered for those with fewer monthly episodes, depending on the degree of impairment. Oral preventive therapies with established efficacy include candesartan, certain beta-blockers, topiramate, and valproate. Parenteral monoclonal antibodies that inhibit calcitonin gene-related peptide activity (eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab) and onabotulinumtoxinA may be considered if oral therapies provide inadequate prevention. 

Tension-type headache is the most common form of primary headache. These headaches are bilateral and characterized by a pressing or dull sensation that is often mild in intensity. They are different from migraine in that they occur infrequently, lack sensory symptoms, and generally are of shorter duration (30 minutes to 24 hours). Fasting-related headache is characterized by diffuse, nonpulsating pain and is relieved with food. 

Heidi Moawad, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Education, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Heidi Moawad, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
 

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.
 

Migraine is a form of recurrent headache that can present as migraine with aura or migraine without aura, with the latter being the most common form. As in this patient, migraine without aura is a chronic form of headache of moderate to severe intensity that usually lasts for several hours but rarely may persist for up to 3 days. Headache pain is unilateral and often aggravated by triggers such as routine physical activity. The American Headache Society diagnostic criteria for migraine without aura include having symptoms of nausea and/or hypersensitivity to light or sound. This patient also described symptoms typical of the prodromal phase of migraine, which include yawning, temperature control, excessive thirst, and mood swings.

Patients who have migraine with aura also have unilateral headache pain of several hours' duration but experience visual (eg, dots or flashes) or sensory (prickly sensation on skin) symptoms, or may have brief difficulty with speech or motor function. These aura symptoms generally last 5 to 60 minutes before abating. 

The worldwide impact of migraine potentially reaches a billion individuals. Its prevalence is second only to tension-type headaches. Migraine occurs in patients of all ages and affects women at a rate two to three times higher than in men. Prevalence appears to peak in the third and fourth decades of life and tends to be lower among older adults. Migraine also has a negative effect on patients' work, school, or social lives, and is associated with increased rates of depression and anxiety in adults. For patients who are prone to migraines, potential triggers include some foods and beverages (including those that contain caffeine and alcohol), menstrual cycles in women, exposure to strobing or bright lights or loud sounds, stressful situations, extra physical activity, and too much or too little sleep. 

Migraine is a clinical diagnosis based on number of headaches (five or more episodes) plus two or more of the characteristic signs (unilateral, throbbing pain, pain intensity of ≥ 5 on a 10-point scale, and pain aggravated by routine physical motion, such as climbing stairs or bending over) plus nausea and/or photosensitivity or phonosensitivity. Prodrome symptoms are reported by about 70% of adult patients. Diagnosis rarely requires neuroimaging; however, before prescribing medication, a complete lab and metabolic workup should be done.

Management of migraine without aura includes acute and preventive interventions. Acute interventions cited by the American Headache Society include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen for mild pain, and migraine-specific therapies such as the triptans, ergotamine derivatives, gepants (rimegepant, ubrogepant), and lasmiditan. Because response to any of these therapies will differ among patients with migraine, shared decision-making with patients about benefits and potential side effects is necessary and should include flexibility to change therapy if needed. 

Preventive therapy should be offered to patients experiencing six or more migraines a month (regardless of impairment) and those, like this patient, with three or more migraines a month that significantly impair daily activities. Preventive therapy can be considered for those with fewer monthly episodes, depending on the degree of impairment. Oral preventive therapies with established efficacy include candesartan, certain beta-blockers, topiramate, and valproate. Parenteral monoclonal antibodies that inhibit calcitonin gene-related peptide activity (eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab) and onabotulinumtoxinA may be considered if oral therapies provide inadequate prevention. 

Tension-type headache is the most common form of primary headache. These headaches are bilateral and characterized by a pressing or dull sensation that is often mild in intensity. They are different from migraine in that they occur infrequently, lack sensory symptoms, and generally are of shorter duration (30 minutes to 24 hours). Fasting-related headache is characterized by diffuse, nonpulsating pain and is relieved with food. 

Heidi Moawad, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Education, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Heidi Moawad, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
 

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.
 

As seen in red on the radiogram, the patient's heart is grossly enlarged, indicating cardiomegaly. Cardiomegaly often is first diagnosed on chest imaging, with diagnosis based on a cardiothoracic ratio of < 0.5. It is not a disease but rather a manifestation of an underlying cause. Patients may have few or no cardiomegaly-related symptoms or have symptoms typical of cardiac dysfunction, like this patient's dyspnea and edema. Conditions that impair normal circulation and that are associated with cardiomegaly development include hypertension, obesity, heart valve disorders, thyroid dysfunction, and anemia. In this patient, cardiomegaly probably has been triggered by uncontrolled hypertension and ongoing obesity. This patient's bloodwork also indicates prediabetes and incipient type 2 diabetes (T2D) (the diagnostic criteria for which are A1c ≥ 6.5% and fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL).

As many as 42% of adults in the United States meet criteria for obesity and are at risk for obesity-related conditions, including cardiomegaly. Guidelines for management of patients with obesity have been published by The Obesity Society and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, and management of obesity is a necessary part of comprehensive care of patients with T2D  as well. For most patients, a BMI ≥ 30 diagnoses obesity; this patient has class 1 obesity, based on a BMI of 30 to 34.9. The patient also has complications of obesity, including stage 2 hypertension and prediabetes. As such, lifestyle management plus medical therapy is the recommended approach to weight loss, with a goal of losing 5% to 10% or more of baseline body weight.

The Obesity Society states that all patients with obesity should be offered effective, evidence-based interventions. Medical management of obesity includes use of pharmacologic interventions with proven benefit in weight loss, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs; eg, semaglutide) or dual gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1 RAs (eg, tirzepatide). Semaglutide and tirzepatide are likely to have cardiovascular benefits for patients with obesity as well. Other medications approved for management of obesity include liraglutide, orlistat, phentermine HCl (with or without topiramate), and naltrexone plus bupropion. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommendations for management of obesity in patients with T2D give preference to semaglutide 2.4 mg/wk and tirzepatide at weekly doses of 5, 10, or 15 mg, depending on patient factors. 

As important for this patient is to get control of hypertension. Studies have shown that lowering blood pressure improves left ventricular hypertrophy, a common source of cardiomegaly. Hypertension guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association recommend a blood pressure goal < 130/80 mm Hg for most adults, which is consistent with the current recommendation from the ADA. Management of hypertension should first incorporate a low-sodium, healthy diet (such as the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension [DASH] diet), physical activity, and weight loss; however, many patients (especially with stage 2 hypertension) require pharmacologic therapy as well. Single-pill combination therapies of drugs from different classes (eg, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor plus calcium channel blocker) are preferred for patients with stage 2 hypertension to improve efficacy and enhance adherence.

Romesh K. Khardori, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Endocrine, and Metabolic Disorders, Eastern Virginia Medical School; EVMS Medical Group, Norfolk, Virginia.

Romesh K. Khardori, MD, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

As seen in red on the radiogram, the patient's heart is grossly enlarged, indicating cardiomegaly. Cardiomegaly often is first diagnosed on chest imaging, with diagnosis based on a cardiothoracic ratio of < 0.5. It is not a disease but rather a manifestation of an underlying cause. Patients may have few or no cardiomegaly-related symptoms or have symptoms typical of cardiac dysfunction, like this patient's dyspnea and edema. Conditions that impair normal circulation and that are associated with cardiomegaly development include hypertension, obesity, heart valve disorders, thyroid dysfunction, and anemia. In this patient, cardiomegaly probably has been triggered by uncontrolled hypertension and ongoing obesity. This patient's bloodwork also indicates prediabetes and incipient type 2 diabetes (T2D) (the diagnostic criteria for which are A1c ≥ 6.5% and fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL).

As many as 42% of adults in the United States meet criteria for obesity and are at risk for obesity-related conditions, including cardiomegaly. Guidelines for management of patients with obesity have been published by The Obesity Society and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, and management of obesity is a necessary part of comprehensive care of patients with T2D  as well. For most patients, a BMI ≥ 30 diagnoses obesity; this patient has class 1 obesity, based on a BMI of 30 to 34.9. The patient also has complications of obesity, including stage 2 hypertension and prediabetes. As such, lifestyle management plus medical therapy is the recommended approach to weight loss, with a goal of losing 5% to 10% or more of baseline body weight.

The Obesity Society states that all patients with obesity should be offered effective, evidence-based interventions. Medical management of obesity includes use of pharmacologic interventions with proven benefit in weight loss, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs; eg, semaglutide) or dual gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1 RAs (eg, tirzepatide). Semaglutide and tirzepatide are likely to have cardiovascular benefits for patients with obesity as well. Other medications approved for management of obesity include liraglutide, orlistat, phentermine HCl (with or without topiramate), and naltrexone plus bupropion. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommendations for management of obesity in patients with T2D give preference to semaglutide 2.4 mg/wk and tirzepatide at weekly doses of 5, 10, or 15 mg, depending on patient factors. 

As important for this patient is to get control of hypertension. Studies have shown that lowering blood pressure improves left ventricular hypertrophy, a common source of cardiomegaly. Hypertension guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association recommend a blood pressure goal < 130/80 mm Hg for most adults, which is consistent with the current recommendation from the ADA. Management of hypertension should first incorporate a low-sodium, healthy diet (such as the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension [DASH] diet), physical activity, and weight loss; however, many patients (especially with stage 2 hypertension) require pharmacologic therapy as well. Single-pill combination therapies of drugs from different classes (eg, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor plus calcium channel blocker) are preferred for patients with stage 2 hypertension to improve efficacy and enhance adherence.

Romesh K. Khardori, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Endocrine, and Metabolic Disorders, Eastern Virginia Medical School; EVMS Medical Group, Norfolk, Virginia.

Romesh K. Khardori, MD, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

As seen in red on the radiogram, the patient's heart is grossly enlarged, indicating cardiomegaly. Cardiomegaly often is first diagnosed on chest imaging, with diagnosis based on a cardiothoracic ratio of < 0.5. It is not a disease but rather a manifestation of an underlying cause. Patients may have few or no cardiomegaly-related symptoms or have symptoms typical of cardiac dysfunction, like this patient's dyspnea and edema. Conditions that impair normal circulation and that are associated with cardiomegaly development include hypertension, obesity, heart valve disorders, thyroid dysfunction, and anemia. In this patient, cardiomegaly probably has been triggered by uncontrolled hypertension and ongoing obesity. This patient's bloodwork also indicates prediabetes and incipient type 2 diabetes (T2D) (the diagnostic criteria for which are A1c ≥ 6.5% and fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL).

As many as 42% of adults in the United States meet criteria for obesity and are at risk for obesity-related conditions, including cardiomegaly. Guidelines for management of patients with obesity have been published by The Obesity Society and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, and management of obesity is a necessary part of comprehensive care of patients with T2D  as well. For most patients, a BMI ≥ 30 diagnoses obesity; this patient has class 1 obesity, based on a BMI of 30 to 34.9. The patient also has complications of obesity, including stage 2 hypertension and prediabetes. As such, lifestyle management plus medical therapy is the recommended approach to weight loss, with a goal of losing 5% to 10% or more of baseline body weight.

The Obesity Society states that all patients with obesity should be offered effective, evidence-based interventions. Medical management of obesity includes use of pharmacologic interventions with proven benefit in weight loss, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs; eg, semaglutide) or dual gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1 RAs (eg, tirzepatide). Semaglutide and tirzepatide are likely to have cardiovascular benefits for patients with obesity as well. Other medications approved for management of obesity include liraglutide, orlistat, phentermine HCl (with or without topiramate), and naltrexone plus bupropion. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommendations for management of obesity in patients with T2D give preference to semaglutide 2.4 mg/wk and tirzepatide at weekly doses of 5, 10, or 15 mg, depending on patient factors. 

As important for this patient is to get control of hypertension. Studies have shown that lowering blood pressure improves left ventricular hypertrophy, a common source of cardiomegaly. Hypertension guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association recommend a blood pressure goal < 130/80 mm Hg for most adults, which is consistent with the current recommendation from the ADA. Management of hypertension should first incorporate a low-sodium, healthy diet (such as the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension [DASH] diet), physical activity, and weight loss; however, many patients (especially with stage 2 hypertension) require pharmacologic therapy as well. Single-pill combination therapies of drugs from different classes (eg, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor plus calcium channel blocker) are preferred for patients with stage 2 hypertension to improve efficacy and enhance adherence.

Romesh K. Khardori, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Endocrine, and Metabolic Disorders, Eastern Virginia Medical School; EVMS Medical Group, Norfolk, Virginia.

Romesh K. Khardori, MD, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Migraines are episodic or chronic headaches, typically occurring on one side of the head, that have distinct characteristics and definitions from the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD 3). Migraine can occur at any age and is thought to affect about 5% of children before puberty, increases in prevalence after puberty, and reaches about 30% prevalence at age 25-30 years. Patients with migraine with aura have recurrent, fully reversible symptoms that can include diplopia, motor or sensory disturbances, and/or trouble with language that generally precede headache development. In some cases, aura may develop and resolve without headache. Migraine with aura can present at any age from early childhood onward and is present in about 30% of children and adolescents with migraine. In general, migraine with aura is more prevalent in female than in male individuals, especially adolescents. 

Migraine with brainstem aura, as is the case here, is a specific subtype of migraine with aura, in which the aura specifically reflects an origin within the brainstem. Brainstem symptoms include diplopia, vertigo, difficulty controlling speech muscles, tinnitus, hearing loss, loss of coordination, and possibly impaired consciousness. For the diagnosis of migraine with brainstem aura, patients must not have motor or retinal symptoms. Aura development often is preceded by premonitory symptoms, such as fatigue, hunger or food cravings, and mood elevations.

Migraine without aura, in contrast, is characterized by recurrent moderate to severe pulsating headache lasting from a few hours to up to 3 days. Migraine without aura often causes nausea and sensitivity to light and/or sound.

Chronic migraine is defined as headache (with or without aura) occurring 15 or more days per month for at least the past 3 months. This patient's history does not fit the definition of chronic migraine.

Tension-type headaches generally are bilateral, with durations ranging from minutes to days. They tend to be mild to moderate in intensity and symptoms are not worsened by physical activity. In addition to their bilateral nature, these headaches differ from migraine in lacking associated visual, cortical, or other symptoms. 

Any diagnosis of migraine requires assessment over time, using diagnostic criteria established by the International Headache Society in ICHD 3. It is not necessary to perform neuroimaging studies or CT in patients with migraine symptoms and an otherwise normal neurologic exam.

When a diagnosis of migraine with brainstem aura is established, pediatric or adolescent patients and their families should first be counseled on nonpharmacologic interventions. These interventions, which have demonstrated benefits in reducing headache frequency, include lifestyle modifications, regular sleep and meal schedules, adequate fluid intake, cognitive-behavioral therapy, stress management techniques, massage, and biofeedback techniques. Recommended for acute treatment of migraine are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and triptans. There is limited evidence in pediatric or adolescent patients with use of preventive medications, such as topiramate, amitriptyline, or onabotulinumtoxinA. In clinical trials, patients receiving placebo saw improvements, and active treatments were only marginally, if at all, more effective. Current guidelines recommend a frank discussion with parents about the limitations of preventive therapies before making decisions to use them. 

Heidi Moawad, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Education, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Heidi Moawad, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Migraines are episodic or chronic headaches, typically occurring on one side of the head, that have distinct characteristics and definitions from the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD 3). Migraine can occur at any age and is thought to affect about 5% of children before puberty, increases in prevalence after puberty, and reaches about 30% prevalence at age 25-30 years. Patients with migraine with aura have recurrent, fully reversible symptoms that can include diplopia, motor or sensory disturbances, and/or trouble with language that generally precede headache development. In some cases, aura may develop and resolve without headache. Migraine with aura can present at any age from early childhood onward and is present in about 30% of children and adolescents with migraine. In general, migraine with aura is more prevalent in female than in male individuals, especially adolescents. 

Migraine with brainstem aura, as is the case here, is a specific subtype of migraine with aura, in which the aura specifically reflects an origin within the brainstem. Brainstem symptoms include diplopia, vertigo, difficulty controlling speech muscles, tinnitus, hearing loss, loss of coordination, and possibly impaired consciousness. For the diagnosis of migraine with brainstem aura, patients must not have motor or retinal symptoms. Aura development often is preceded by premonitory symptoms, such as fatigue, hunger or food cravings, and mood elevations.

Migraine without aura, in contrast, is characterized by recurrent moderate to severe pulsating headache lasting from a few hours to up to 3 days. Migraine without aura often causes nausea and sensitivity to light and/or sound.

Chronic migraine is defined as headache (with or without aura) occurring 15 or more days per month for at least the past 3 months. This patient's history does not fit the definition of chronic migraine.

Tension-type headaches generally are bilateral, with durations ranging from minutes to days. They tend to be mild to moderate in intensity and symptoms are not worsened by physical activity. In addition to their bilateral nature, these headaches differ from migraine in lacking associated visual, cortical, or other symptoms. 

Any diagnosis of migraine requires assessment over time, using diagnostic criteria established by the International Headache Society in ICHD 3. It is not necessary to perform neuroimaging studies or CT in patients with migraine symptoms and an otherwise normal neurologic exam.

When a diagnosis of migraine with brainstem aura is established, pediatric or adolescent patients and their families should first be counseled on nonpharmacologic interventions. These interventions, which have demonstrated benefits in reducing headache frequency, include lifestyle modifications, regular sleep and meal schedules, adequate fluid intake, cognitive-behavioral therapy, stress management techniques, massage, and biofeedback techniques. Recommended for acute treatment of migraine are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and triptans. There is limited evidence in pediatric or adolescent patients with use of preventive medications, such as topiramate, amitriptyline, or onabotulinumtoxinA. In clinical trials, patients receiving placebo saw improvements, and active treatments were only marginally, if at all, more effective. Current guidelines recommend a frank discussion with parents about the limitations of preventive therapies before making decisions to use them. 

Heidi Moawad, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Education, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Heidi Moawad, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Migraines are episodic or chronic headaches, typically occurring on one side of the head, that have distinct characteristics and definitions from the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD 3). Migraine can occur at any age and is thought to affect about 5% of children before puberty, increases in prevalence after puberty, and reaches about 30% prevalence at age 25-30 years. Patients with migraine with aura have recurrent, fully reversible symptoms that can include diplopia, motor or sensory disturbances, and/or trouble with language that generally precede headache development. In some cases, aura may develop and resolve without headache. Migraine with aura can present at any age from early childhood onward and is present in about 30% of children and adolescents with migraine. In general, migraine with aura is more prevalent in female than in male individuals, especially adolescents. 

Migraine with brainstem aura, as is the case here, is a specific subtype of migraine with aura, in which the aura specifically reflects an origin within the brainstem. Brainstem symptoms include diplopia, vertigo, difficulty controlling speech muscles, tinnitus, hearing loss, loss of coordination, and possibly impaired consciousness. For the diagnosis of migraine with brainstem aura, patients must not have motor or retinal symptoms. Aura development often is preceded by premonitory symptoms, such as fatigue, hunger or food cravings, and mood elevations.

Migraine without aura, in contrast, is characterized by recurrent moderate to severe pulsating headache lasting from a few hours to up to 3 days. Migraine without aura often causes nausea and sensitivity to light and/or sound.

Chronic migraine is defined as headache (with or without aura) occurring 15 or more days per month for at least the past 3 months. This patient's history does not fit the definition of chronic migraine.

Tension-type headaches generally are bilateral, with durations ranging from minutes to days. They tend to be mild to moderate in intensity and symptoms are not worsened by physical activity. In addition to their bilateral nature, these headaches differ from migraine in lacking associated visual, cortical, or other symptoms. 

Any diagnosis of migraine requires assessment over time, using diagnostic criteria established by the International Headache Society in ICHD 3. It is not necessary to perform neuroimaging studies or CT in patients with migraine symptoms and an otherwise normal neurologic exam.

When a diagnosis of migraine with brainstem aura is established, pediatric or adolescent patients and their families should first be counseled on nonpharmacologic interventions. These interventions, which have demonstrated benefits in reducing headache frequency, include lifestyle modifications, regular sleep and meal schedules, adequate fluid intake, cognitive-behavioral therapy, stress management techniques, massage, and biofeedback techniques. Recommended for acute treatment of migraine are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and triptans. There is limited evidence in pediatric or adolescent patients with use of preventive medications, such as topiramate, amitriptyline, or onabotulinumtoxinA. In clinical trials, patients receiving placebo saw improvements, and active treatments were only marginally, if at all, more effective. Current guidelines recommend a frank discussion with parents about the limitations of preventive therapies before making decisions to use them. 

Heidi Moawad, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Education, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Heidi Moawad, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Given clinical and imaging outcomes, as well as results on IHC assay, this patient is diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer and is referred for further consultation with a multidisciplinary care team.

Triple-negative breast cancer accounts for 15% of all female breast cancer cases. The term "triple-negative" refers to the absence of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) targets and the HER2 target for treatment. Otherwise, triple-negative breast cancer is highly heterogeneous and includes multiple molecular subtypes. Typically, triple-negative breast cancer occurs in younger patients, has a higher grade, a greater tumor size, a higher clinical stage at diagnosis, and a poorer prognosis than non–triple-negative breast cancers.

Biopsy samples from patients with a new primary or newly metastatic breast cancer diagnosis should undergo HR testing, both ER and PR, as well as HER2 receptor testing. Results of ER and PR testing are negative if a validated IHC assay shows 0% to < 1% of nuclei stain, according to the latest American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) HR testing guideline. HER2 results are negative if a validated IHC assay shows weak to moderate complete membrane staining in < 10% of tumor cells, according to ASCO/CAP guidelines. If HER2 results of a primary tumor are negative and specific clinical criteria suggest further testing, the oncologist may choose to order another IHC assay or a validated dual probe in situ hybridization (ISH) assay to aid in clinical decision-making.

Pathologic classification of triple-negative breast cancers includes multiple subgroups determined by therapeutic possibilities: low-risk histologic types (salivary gland–like carcinomas, fibromatosis-like carcinoma, low-grade adenosquamous breast carcinoma), immune activation (tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, CD8, programmed death–ligand 1, tumor mutational burden), HER2-low status (IHC score 1+/2+ nonamplified), associated germline BRCA mutations, and other targets (trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2, HER3). 

Family history is the most common risk factor for developing breast cancer. If a person's mother or sister had breast cancer, the lifetime risk for that individual is four times greater than that of the general population. Risk for breast cancer grows even more if two or more first-degree relatives are diagnosed, or if one first-degree relative was diagnosed with breast cancer at ≤ 50 years of age. About 25% of triple-negative breast cancer cases have accompanying germline BRCA mutations. A recent study by Ahearn and colleagues found that 85 variants were linked to one or more tumor feature of ER-negative disease, and 32 of those variants were associated with triple-negative disease.

For a breast cancer diagnosis, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends multidisciplinary care as well as the development of a personalized survivorship treatment plan, which includes a customized summary of possible long-term treatment toxicities. In addition, multidisciplinary care coordination encourages close follow-up that helps patients adhere to their medications and stay current with ongoing screening.

Because triple-negative breast cancer lacks HR and HER2 therapeutic targets, it can be difficult to treat. Standard therapy for high-risk triple-negative tumors includes chemotherapy with taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) plus anthracycline-based treatment (cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with stage 2 and 3 tumors to reduce locoregional surgical extension and to allow for personalized treatment based on pathologic response. In 2018, two poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors, olaparib and talazoparib, were approved for use in select patients with triple-negative breast cancer, significantly changing the treatment paradigm for this disease. Other promising treatments have emerged recently in clinical trials for triple-negative disease, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors, and cytotoxin-conjugated antibodies.

Daniel S. Schwartz, MD, is Medical Director of Thoracic Oncology, St. Catherine of Siena Medical Center, Catholic Health Services, Smithtown, New York.

Dr. Schwartz serve(d) as a member of the following medical societies:
American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Surgeons, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Western Thoracic Surgical Association.

Disclosure: Daniel S. Schwartz, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.
 

Given clinical and imaging outcomes, as well as results on IHC assay, this patient is diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer and is referred for further consultation with a multidisciplinary care team.

Triple-negative breast cancer accounts for 15% of all female breast cancer cases. The term "triple-negative" refers to the absence of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) targets and the HER2 target for treatment. Otherwise, triple-negative breast cancer is highly heterogeneous and includes multiple molecular subtypes. Typically, triple-negative breast cancer occurs in younger patients, has a higher grade, a greater tumor size, a higher clinical stage at diagnosis, and a poorer prognosis than non–triple-negative breast cancers.

Biopsy samples from patients with a new primary or newly metastatic breast cancer diagnosis should undergo HR testing, both ER and PR, as well as HER2 receptor testing. Results of ER and PR testing are negative if a validated IHC assay shows 0% to < 1% of nuclei stain, according to the latest American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) HR testing guideline. HER2 results are negative if a validated IHC assay shows weak to moderate complete membrane staining in < 10% of tumor cells, according to ASCO/CAP guidelines. If HER2 results of a primary tumor are negative and specific clinical criteria suggest further testing, the oncologist may choose to order another IHC assay or a validated dual probe in situ hybridization (ISH) assay to aid in clinical decision-making.

Pathologic classification of triple-negative breast cancers includes multiple subgroups determined by therapeutic possibilities: low-risk histologic types (salivary gland–like carcinomas, fibromatosis-like carcinoma, low-grade adenosquamous breast carcinoma), immune activation (tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, CD8, programmed death–ligand 1, tumor mutational burden), HER2-low status (IHC score 1+/2+ nonamplified), associated germline BRCA mutations, and other targets (trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2, HER3). 

Family history is the most common risk factor for developing breast cancer. If a person's mother or sister had breast cancer, the lifetime risk for that individual is four times greater than that of the general population. Risk for breast cancer grows even more if two or more first-degree relatives are diagnosed, or if one first-degree relative was diagnosed with breast cancer at ≤ 50 years of age. About 25% of triple-negative breast cancer cases have accompanying germline BRCA mutations. A recent study by Ahearn and colleagues found that 85 variants were linked to one or more tumor feature of ER-negative disease, and 32 of those variants were associated with triple-negative disease.

For a breast cancer diagnosis, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends multidisciplinary care as well as the development of a personalized survivorship treatment plan, which includes a customized summary of possible long-term treatment toxicities. In addition, multidisciplinary care coordination encourages close follow-up that helps patients adhere to their medications and stay current with ongoing screening.

Because triple-negative breast cancer lacks HR and HER2 therapeutic targets, it can be difficult to treat. Standard therapy for high-risk triple-negative tumors includes chemotherapy with taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) plus anthracycline-based treatment (cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with stage 2 and 3 tumors to reduce locoregional surgical extension and to allow for personalized treatment based on pathologic response. In 2018, two poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors, olaparib and talazoparib, were approved for use in select patients with triple-negative breast cancer, significantly changing the treatment paradigm for this disease. Other promising treatments have emerged recently in clinical trials for triple-negative disease, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors, and cytotoxin-conjugated antibodies.

Daniel S. Schwartz, MD, is Medical Director of Thoracic Oncology, St. Catherine of Siena Medical Center, Catholic Health Services, Smithtown, New York.

Dr. Schwartz serve(d) as a member of the following medical societies:
American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Surgeons, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Western Thoracic Surgical Association.

Disclosure: Daniel S. Schwartz, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.
 

Given clinical and imaging outcomes, as well as results on IHC assay, this patient is diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer and is referred for further consultation with a multidisciplinary care team.

Triple-negative breast cancer accounts for 15% of all female breast cancer cases. The term "triple-negative" refers to the absence of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) targets and the HER2 target for treatment. Otherwise, triple-negative breast cancer is highly heterogeneous and includes multiple molecular subtypes. Typically, triple-negative breast cancer occurs in younger patients, has a higher grade, a greater tumor size, a higher clinical stage at diagnosis, and a poorer prognosis than non–triple-negative breast cancers.

Biopsy samples from patients with a new primary or newly metastatic breast cancer diagnosis should undergo HR testing, both ER and PR, as well as HER2 receptor testing. Results of ER and PR testing are negative if a validated IHC assay shows 0% to < 1% of nuclei stain, according to the latest American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) HR testing guideline. HER2 results are negative if a validated IHC assay shows weak to moderate complete membrane staining in < 10% of tumor cells, according to ASCO/CAP guidelines. If HER2 results of a primary tumor are negative and specific clinical criteria suggest further testing, the oncologist may choose to order another IHC assay or a validated dual probe in situ hybridization (ISH) assay to aid in clinical decision-making.

Pathologic classification of triple-negative breast cancers includes multiple subgroups determined by therapeutic possibilities: low-risk histologic types (salivary gland–like carcinomas, fibromatosis-like carcinoma, low-grade adenosquamous breast carcinoma), immune activation (tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, CD8, programmed death–ligand 1, tumor mutational burden), HER2-low status (IHC score 1+/2+ nonamplified), associated germline BRCA mutations, and other targets (trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2, HER3). 

Family history is the most common risk factor for developing breast cancer. If a person's mother or sister had breast cancer, the lifetime risk for that individual is four times greater than that of the general population. Risk for breast cancer grows even more if two or more first-degree relatives are diagnosed, or if one first-degree relative was diagnosed with breast cancer at ≤ 50 years of age. About 25% of triple-negative breast cancer cases have accompanying germline BRCA mutations. A recent study by Ahearn and colleagues found that 85 variants were linked to one or more tumor feature of ER-negative disease, and 32 of those variants were associated with triple-negative disease.

For a breast cancer diagnosis, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends multidisciplinary care as well as the development of a personalized survivorship treatment plan, which includes a customized summary of possible long-term treatment toxicities. In addition, multidisciplinary care coordination encourages close follow-up that helps patients adhere to their medications and stay current with ongoing screening.

Because triple-negative breast cancer lacks HR and HER2 therapeutic targets, it can be difficult to treat. Standard therapy for high-risk triple-negative tumors includes chemotherapy with taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) plus anthracycline-based treatment (cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with stage 2 and 3 tumors to reduce locoregional surgical extension and to allow for personalized treatment based on pathologic response. In 2018, two poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors, olaparib and talazoparib, were approved for use in select patients with triple-negative breast cancer, significantly changing the treatment paradigm for this disease. Other promising treatments have emerged recently in clinical trials for triple-negative disease, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors, and cytotoxin-conjugated antibodies.

Daniel S. Schwartz, MD, is Medical Director of Thoracic Oncology, St. Catherine of Siena Medical Center, Catholic Health Services, Smithtown, New York.

Dr. Schwartz serve(d) as a member of the following medical societies:
American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Surgeons, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Western Thoracic Surgical Association.

Disclosure: Daniel S. Schwartz, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.
 

In a lifelong smoker, a tumor in the periphery of the lung and histology showing glandular cells with some neuroendocrine differentiation is most likely large cell carcinoma, a type of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although small cell lung cancer is also associated with smoking, histology typically demonstrates highly cellular aspirates with small blue cells with very scant or null cytoplasm, loosely arranged or in a syncytial pattern. Bronchial adenoma is unlikely, given the patient's unintentional weight loss and fatigue over the past few months. Mesothelioma is most associated with asbestos exposure and is found in the lung pleura, which typically presents with pleural effusion.

Lung cancer is the top cause of cancer deaths in the US, second only to prostate cancer in men and breast cancer in women; approximately 85% of all lung cancers are classified as NSCLC. Histologically, NSCLC is further categorized into adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma (LCC). When a patient presents with intrathoracic symptoms (including cough, chest pain, wheezing, or dyspnea) and a pulmonary nodule on chest radiography, NSCLC is typically suspected as a possible diagnosis. Smoking is the most common cause of this lung cancer (78% in men, 90% in women). 

Several methods confirm the diagnosis of NSCLC, including bronchoscopy, sputum cytology, mediastinoscopy, thoracentesis, thoracoscopy, and transthoracic needle biopsy. Which method is chosen depends on the primary lesion location and accessibility. Histologic evaluation helps differentiate between the various subtypes of NSCLC. LCC is a subset of NSCLC that is a diagnosis of exclusion. Histologically, LCC is poorly differentiated, and 90% of cases will show squamous, glandular, or neuroendocrine differentiation.

When first diagnosed with NSCLC, 20% of patients have cancer confined to a specific area, 25% of patients have cancer that has spread to nearby areas, and 55% of patients have cancer that has spread to distant body parts. The specific symptoms experienced by patients will vary depending on the location of the cancer. The prognosis for NSCLC depends on the staging of the tumor, nodes, and metastases, the patient's performance status, and any existing health conditions. In the US, the 5-year relative survival rate is 61.2% for localized disease, 33.5% for regional disease, and 7.0% for disease with distant metastases. 

Treatment of NSCLC also varies according to the patient's functional status, tumor stage, molecular characteristics, and comorbidities. Generally, patients with stage I, II, or III NSCLC are treated with the intent to cure, which can include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or a combined approach. Lobectomy or resection is generally accepted as an approach for surgical intervention on early-stage NSCLC; however, for stages higher than IB (including stage II/III), patients are recommended to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with stage IV disease (or recurrence after initial management) are typically treated with systemic therapy or should be considered for palliative treatment to improve quality of life and overall survival.
 

Karl J. D'Silva, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston; Medical Director, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Peabody, Massachusetts.

Karl J. D'Silva, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

In a lifelong smoker, a tumor in the periphery of the lung and histology showing glandular cells with some neuroendocrine differentiation is most likely large cell carcinoma, a type of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although small cell lung cancer is also associated with smoking, histology typically demonstrates highly cellular aspirates with small blue cells with very scant or null cytoplasm, loosely arranged or in a syncytial pattern. Bronchial adenoma is unlikely, given the patient's unintentional weight loss and fatigue over the past few months. Mesothelioma is most associated with asbestos exposure and is found in the lung pleura, which typically presents with pleural effusion.

Lung cancer is the top cause of cancer deaths in the US, second only to prostate cancer in men and breast cancer in women; approximately 85% of all lung cancers are classified as NSCLC. Histologically, NSCLC is further categorized into adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma (LCC). When a patient presents with intrathoracic symptoms (including cough, chest pain, wheezing, or dyspnea) and a pulmonary nodule on chest radiography, NSCLC is typically suspected as a possible diagnosis. Smoking is the most common cause of this lung cancer (78% in men, 90% in women). 

Several methods confirm the diagnosis of NSCLC, including bronchoscopy, sputum cytology, mediastinoscopy, thoracentesis, thoracoscopy, and transthoracic needle biopsy. Which method is chosen depends on the primary lesion location and accessibility. Histologic evaluation helps differentiate between the various subtypes of NSCLC. LCC is a subset of NSCLC that is a diagnosis of exclusion. Histologically, LCC is poorly differentiated, and 90% of cases will show squamous, glandular, or neuroendocrine differentiation.

When first diagnosed with NSCLC, 20% of patients have cancer confined to a specific area, 25% of patients have cancer that has spread to nearby areas, and 55% of patients have cancer that has spread to distant body parts. The specific symptoms experienced by patients will vary depending on the location of the cancer. The prognosis for NSCLC depends on the staging of the tumor, nodes, and metastases, the patient's performance status, and any existing health conditions. In the US, the 5-year relative survival rate is 61.2% for localized disease, 33.5% for regional disease, and 7.0% for disease with distant metastases. 

Treatment of NSCLC also varies according to the patient's functional status, tumor stage, molecular characteristics, and comorbidities. Generally, patients with stage I, II, or III NSCLC are treated with the intent to cure, which can include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or a combined approach. Lobectomy or resection is generally accepted as an approach for surgical intervention on early-stage NSCLC; however, for stages higher than IB (including stage II/III), patients are recommended to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with stage IV disease (or recurrence after initial management) are typically treated with systemic therapy or should be considered for palliative treatment to improve quality of life and overall survival.
 

Karl J. D'Silva, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston; Medical Director, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Peabody, Massachusetts.

Karl J. D'Silva, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

In a lifelong smoker, a tumor in the periphery of the lung and histology showing glandular cells with some neuroendocrine differentiation is most likely large cell carcinoma, a type of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although small cell lung cancer is also associated with smoking, histology typically demonstrates highly cellular aspirates with small blue cells with very scant or null cytoplasm, loosely arranged or in a syncytial pattern. Bronchial adenoma is unlikely, given the patient's unintentional weight loss and fatigue over the past few months. Mesothelioma is most associated with asbestos exposure and is found in the lung pleura, which typically presents with pleural effusion.

Lung cancer is the top cause of cancer deaths in the US, second only to prostate cancer in men and breast cancer in women; approximately 85% of all lung cancers are classified as NSCLC. Histologically, NSCLC is further categorized into adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma (LCC). When a patient presents with intrathoracic symptoms (including cough, chest pain, wheezing, or dyspnea) and a pulmonary nodule on chest radiography, NSCLC is typically suspected as a possible diagnosis. Smoking is the most common cause of this lung cancer (78% in men, 90% in women). 

Several methods confirm the diagnosis of NSCLC, including bronchoscopy, sputum cytology, mediastinoscopy, thoracentesis, thoracoscopy, and transthoracic needle biopsy. Which method is chosen depends on the primary lesion location and accessibility. Histologic evaluation helps differentiate between the various subtypes of NSCLC. LCC is a subset of NSCLC that is a diagnosis of exclusion. Histologically, LCC is poorly differentiated, and 90% of cases will show squamous, glandular, or neuroendocrine differentiation.

When first diagnosed with NSCLC, 20% of patients have cancer confined to a specific area, 25% of patients have cancer that has spread to nearby areas, and 55% of patients have cancer that has spread to distant body parts. The specific symptoms experienced by patients will vary depending on the location of the cancer. The prognosis for NSCLC depends on the staging of the tumor, nodes, and metastases, the patient's performance status, and any existing health conditions. In the US, the 5-year relative survival rate is 61.2% for localized disease, 33.5% for regional disease, and 7.0% for disease with distant metastases. 

Treatment of NSCLC also varies according to the patient's functional status, tumor stage, molecular characteristics, and comorbidities. Generally, patients with stage I, II, or III NSCLC are treated with the intent to cure, which can include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or a combined approach. Lobectomy or resection is generally accepted as an approach for surgical intervention on early-stage NSCLC; however, for stages higher than IB (including stage II/III), patients are recommended to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with stage IV disease (or recurrence after initial management) are typically treated with systemic therapy or should be considered for palliative treatment to improve quality of life and overall survival.
 

Karl J. D'Silva, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston; Medical Director, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Peabody, Massachusetts.

Karl J. D'Silva, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Given the patient's results on the genetic panel and MRI, as well as the noted cognitive decline and increased aggression, this patient is suspected of having limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE) secondary to AD and is referred to the neurologist on her multidisciplinary care team for further consultation and testing.

AD is one of the most common forms of dementia. More than 6 million people in the United States have clinical AD or mild cognitive impairment because of AD. LATE is a new classification of dementia, identified in 2019, that mimics AD but is a unique disease entity driven by the misfolding of the protein TDP-43, which regulates gene expression in the brain. Misfolded TDP-43 protein is common among older adults aged ≥ 85 years, and about a quarter of this population has enough misfolded TDP-43 protein to affect their memory and cognition. 

Diagnosing AD currently relies on a clinical approach. A complete physical examination, with a detailed neurologic examination and a mental status examination, is used to evaluate disease stage. Initial mental status testing evaluates attention and concentration, recent and remote memory, language, praxis, executive function, and visuospatial function. Because LATE is a newly discovered form of dementia, there are no set guidelines on diagnosing LATE and no robust biomarker for TDP-43. What is known about LATE has been gleaned mostly from retrospective clinicopathologic studies. 

The LATE consensus working group reports that the clinical course of disease, as studied by autopsy-proven LATE neuropathologic change (LATE-NC), is described as an "amnestic cognitive syndrome that can evolve to incorporate multiple cognitive domains and ultimately to impair activities of daily living." Researchers are currently analyzing different clinical assessments and neuroimaging with MRI to characterize LATE. A group of international researchers recently published a set of clinical criteria for limbic-predominant amnestic neurodegenerative syndrome (LANS), which is associated with LATE-NC. Their criteria include "core, standard and advanced features that are measurable in vivo, including older age at evaluation, mild clinical syndrome, disproportionate hippocampal atrophy, impaired semantic memory, limbic hypometabolism, absence of neocortical degenerative patterns and low likelihood of neocortical tau, with degrees of certainty (highest, high, moderate, low)." Other neuroimaging studies of autopsy-confirmed LATE-NC have shown that atrophy is mostly focused in the medial temporal lobe with marked reduced hippocampal volume.

The group reports that LATE and AD probably share pathophysiologic mechanisms. One of the universally accepted hallmarks of AD is the formation of beta-amyloid plaques, which are dense, mostly insoluble deposits of beta-amyloid protein that develop around neurons in the hippocampus and other regions in the cerebral cortex used for decision-making. These plaques disrupt brain function and lead to brain atrophy. The LATE group also reports that this same pathology has been noted with LATE: "Many subjects with LATE-NC have comorbid brain pathologies, often including amyloid-beta plaques and tauopathy." That said, genetic studies have helped identify five genes with risk alleles for LATE (GRN, TMEM106B, ABCC9, KCNMB2, and APOE), suggesting disease-specific underlying mechanisms compared to AD. 

Patient and caregiver education and guidance is vital with a dementia diagnosis. If LATE and/or AD are suspected, physicians should encourage the involvement of family and friends who agree to become more involved in the patient's care as the disease progresses. These individuals need to understand the patient's wishes around care, especially for the future when the patient is no longer able to make decisions. The patient may also consider establishing medical advance directives and durable power of attorney for medical and financial decision-making. Caregivers supporting the patient are encouraged to help balance the physical needs of the patient while maintaining respect for them as a competent adult to the extent allowed by the progression of their disease. 

Because LATE is a new classification of dementia, there are no known effective treatments. One ongoing study is testing the use of autologous bone marrow–derived stem cells to help improve cognitive impairment among patients with LATE, AD, and other dementias. Current AD treatments are focused on symptomatic therapies that modulate neurotransmitters — either acetylcholine or glutamate. The standard medical treatment includes cholinesterase inhibitors and a partial N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist. Two amyloid-directed antibodies (aducanumab, lecanemab) are currently available in the United States for individuals with AD exhibiting mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia. A third agent currently in clinical trials (donanemab) has shown significantly slowed clinical progression after 1.5 years among clinical trial participants with early symptomatic AD and amyloid and tau pathology.

Shaheen E. Lakhan, MD, PhD, MS, MEd, Chief of Pain Management, Carilion Clinic and Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia.

Disclosure: Shaheen E. Lakhan, MD, PhD, MS, MEd, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Given the patient's results on the genetic panel and MRI, as well as the noted cognitive decline and increased aggression, this patient is suspected of having limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE) secondary to AD and is referred to the neurologist on her multidisciplinary care team for further consultation and testing.

AD is one of the most common forms of dementia. More than 6 million people in the United States have clinical AD or mild cognitive impairment because of AD. LATE is a new classification of dementia, identified in 2019, that mimics AD but is a unique disease entity driven by the misfolding of the protein TDP-43, which regulates gene expression in the brain. Misfolded TDP-43 protein is common among older adults aged ≥ 85 years, and about a quarter of this population has enough misfolded TDP-43 protein to affect their memory and cognition. 

Diagnosing AD currently relies on a clinical approach. A complete physical examination, with a detailed neurologic examination and a mental status examination, is used to evaluate disease stage. Initial mental status testing evaluates attention and concentration, recent and remote memory, language, praxis, executive function, and visuospatial function. Because LATE is a newly discovered form of dementia, there are no set guidelines on diagnosing LATE and no robust biomarker for TDP-43. What is known about LATE has been gleaned mostly from retrospective clinicopathologic studies. 

The LATE consensus working group reports that the clinical course of disease, as studied by autopsy-proven LATE neuropathologic change (LATE-NC), is described as an "amnestic cognitive syndrome that can evolve to incorporate multiple cognitive domains and ultimately to impair activities of daily living." Researchers are currently analyzing different clinical assessments and neuroimaging with MRI to characterize LATE. A group of international researchers recently published a set of clinical criteria for limbic-predominant amnestic neurodegenerative syndrome (LANS), which is associated with LATE-NC. Their criteria include "core, standard and advanced features that are measurable in vivo, including older age at evaluation, mild clinical syndrome, disproportionate hippocampal atrophy, impaired semantic memory, limbic hypometabolism, absence of neocortical degenerative patterns and low likelihood of neocortical tau, with degrees of certainty (highest, high, moderate, low)." Other neuroimaging studies of autopsy-confirmed LATE-NC have shown that atrophy is mostly focused in the medial temporal lobe with marked reduced hippocampal volume.

The group reports that LATE and AD probably share pathophysiologic mechanisms. One of the universally accepted hallmarks of AD is the formation of beta-amyloid plaques, which are dense, mostly insoluble deposits of beta-amyloid protein that develop around neurons in the hippocampus and other regions in the cerebral cortex used for decision-making. These plaques disrupt brain function and lead to brain atrophy. The LATE group also reports that this same pathology has been noted with LATE: "Many subjects with LATE-NC have comorbid brain pathologies, often including amyloid-beta plaques and tauopathy." That said, genetic studies have helped identify five genes with risk alleles for LATE (GRN, TMEM106B, ABCC9, KCNMB2, and APOE), suggesting disease-specific underlying mechanisms compared to AD. 

Patient and caregiver education and guidance is vital with a dementia diagnosis. If LATE and/or AD are suspected, physicians should encourage the involvement of family and friends who agree to become more involved in the patient's care as the disease progresses. These individuals need to understand the patient's wishes around care, especially for the future when the patient is no longer able to make decisions. The patient may also consider establishing medical advance directives and durable power of attorney for medical and financial decision-making. Caregivers supporting the patient are encouraged to help balance the physical needs of the patient while maintaining respect for them as a competent adult to the extent allowed by the progression of their disease. 

Because LATE is a new classification of dementia, there are no known effective treatments. One ongoing study is testing the use of autologous bone marrow–derived stem cells to help improve cognitive impairment among patients with LATE, AD, and other dementias. Current AD treatments are focused on symptomatic therapies that modulate neurotransmitters — either acetylcholine or glutamate. The standard medical treatment includes cholinesterase inhibitors and a partial N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist. Two amyloid-directed antibodies (aducanumab, lecanemab) are currently available in the United States for individuals with AD exhibiting mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia. A third agent currently in clinical trials (donanemab) has shown significantly slowed clinical progression after 1.5 years among clinical trial participants with early symptomatic AD and amyloid and tau pathology.

Shaheen E. Lakhan, MD, PhD, MS, MEd, Chief of Pain Management, Carilion Clinic and Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia.

Disclosure: Shaheen E. Lakhan, MD, PhD, MS, MEd, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Given the patient's results on the genetic panel and MRI, as well as the noted cognitive decline and increased aggression, this patient is suspected of having limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE) secondary to AD and is referred to the neurologist on her multidisciplinary care team for further consultation and testing.

AD is one of the most common forms of dementia. More than 6 million people in the United States have clinical AD or mild cognitive impairment because of AD. LATE is a new classification of dementia, identified in 2019, that mimics AD but is a unique disease entity driven by the misfolding of the protein TDP-43, which regulates gene expression in the brain. Misfolded TDP-43 protein is common among older adults aged ≥ 85 years, and about a quarter of this population has enough misfolded TDP-43 protein to affect their memory and cognition. 

Diagnosing AD currently relies on a clinical approach. A complete physical examination, with a detailed neurologic examination and a mental status examination, is used to evaluate disease stage. Initial mental status testing evaluates attention and concentration, recent and remote memory, language, praxis, executive function, and visuospatial function. Because LATE is a newly discovered form of dementia, there are no set guidelines on diagnosing LATE and no robust biomarker for TDP-43. What is known about LATE has been gleaned mostly from retrospective clinicopathologic studies. 

The LATE consensus working group reports that the clinical course of disease, as studied by autopsy-proven LATE neuropathologic change (LATE-NC), is described as an "amnestic cognitive syndrome that can evolve to incorporate multiple cognitive domains and ultimately to impair activities of daily living." Researchers are currently analyzing different clinical assessments and neuroimaging with MRI to characterize LATE. A group of international researchers recently published a set of clinical criteria for limbic-predominant amnestic neurodegenerative syndrome (LANS), which is associated with LATE-NC. Their criteria include "core, standard and advanced features that are measurable in vivo, including older age at evaluation, mild clinical syndrome, disproportionate hippocampal atrophy, impaired semantic memory, limbic hypometabolism, absence of neocortical degenerative patterns and low likelihood of neocortical tau, with degrees of certainty (highest, high, moderate, low)." Other neuroimaging studies of autopsy-confirmed LATE-NC have shown that atrophy is mostly focused in the medial temporal lobe with marked reduced hippocampal volume.

The group reports that LATE and AD probably share pathophysiologic mechanisms. One of the universally accepted hallmarks of AD is the formation of beta-amyloid plaques, which are dense, mostly insoluble deposits of beta-amyloid protein that develop around neurons in the hippocampus and other regions in the cerebral cortex used for decision-making. These plaques disrupt brain function and lead to brain atrophy. The LATE group also reports that this same pathology has been noted with LATE: "Many subjects with LATE-NC have comorbid brain pathologies, often including amyloid-beta plaques and tauopathy." That said, genetic studies have helped identify five genes with risk alleles for LATE (GRN, TMEM106B, ABCC9, KCNMB2, and APOE), suggesting disease-specific underlying mechanisms compared to AD. 

Patient and caregiver education and guidance is vital with a dementia diagnosis. If LATE and/or AD are suspected, physicians should encourage the involvement of family and friends who agree to become more involved in the patient's care as the disease progresses. These individuals need to understand the patient's wishes around care, especially for the future when the patient is no longer able to make decisions. The patient may also consider establishing medical advance directives and durable power of attorney for medical and financial decision-making. Caregivers supporting the patient are encouraged to help balance the physical needs of the patient while maintaining respect for them as a competent adult to the extent allowed by the progression of their disease. 

Because LATE is a new classification of dementia, there are no known effective treatments. One ongoing study is testing the use of autologous bone marrow–derived stem cells to help improve cognitive impairment among patients with LATE, AD, and other dementias. Current AD treatments are focused on symptomatic therapies that modulate neurotransmitters — either acetylcholine or glutamate. The standard medical treatment includes cholinesterase inhibitors and a partial N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist. Two amyloid-directed antibodies (aducanumab, lecanemab) are currently available in the United States for individuals with AD exhibiting mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia. A third agent currently in clinical trials (donanemab) has shown significantly slowed clinical progression after 1.5 years among clinical trial participants with early symptomatic AD and amyloid and tau pathology.

Shaheen E. Lakhan, MD, PhD, MS, MEd, Chief of Pain Management, Carilion Clinic and Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia.

Disclosure: Shaheen E. Lakhan, MD, PhD, MS, MEd, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Migraine is one of the most common neurologic diseases, affecting about 14% of the population. Migraines may also be associated with auras or visual or sensory symptoms that precede the headache. However, approximately 4% of people with migraine experience their usual migraines and sometimes also experience episodes of an aura that is not followed by a headache. Silent migraines, also known as acephalgic migraines or "migraine auras without headache," typically cause symptoms that accompany the phases of a migraine, but without the classic headache pain. It is most common among young adults in their 20s and 30s and older adults between 40 and 60 years of age, especially in those who had auras accompanied by migraine headaches when younger. 

According to the International Headache Society, a migraine aura develops gradually over 5 to 10 minutes and lasts for less than 1 hour. Although the symptoms of a silent migraine may vary from person to person, visual symptoms occur in more than 90% of migraine auras. Visual symptoms may also be accompanied by other neurologic symptoms such as dizziness, numbness or tingling, and aphasia. The most common visual symptoms are positive symptoms, such as flash scotoma, visual distortion, colored spots, and flash hallucinations. Visual symptoms may easily be confused with symptoms of a transient ischemic attack (TIA). However, migraine auras generally last 15 to 30 minutes. They are often described as dynamic, bright, multicolored forms in geometric patterns. In contrast, the visual symptoms of a TIA last on average 3 to 10 minutes and are described as a static, dark dimming of vision. 

The diagnosis of migraine aura without headache should be made after all other possible causes have been excluded, particularly TIAs and focal seizures because of the diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic implications. Testing may include a neurologic and eye examination, MRI, CT angiography, and laboratory testing for clotting disorders. 

Migraine aura without headache is a benign condition and generally does not require treatment. When symptoms of silent migraines are severe enough, low-dose aspirin and calcium-channel blockers may be considered as treatment options. However, triptans, which are often used in patients with migraine headaches, should not be used to treat silent migraines because they do not act fast enough to affect an aura. In addition, triptans should be used with caution in older patients, who may have vascular disease, hypertension, and other cardiovascular risk factors. 
 

Jasmin Harpe, MD, MPH, Headache Fellow, Department of Neurology, Harvard University, John R. Graham Headache Center, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA

Jasmin Harpe, MD, MPH, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Migraine is one of the most common neurologic diseases, affecting about 14% of the population. Migraines may also be associated with auras or visual or sensory symptoms that precede the headache. However, approximately 4% of people with migraine experience their usual migraines and sometimes also experience episodes of an aura that is not followed by a headache. Silent migraines, also known as acephalgic migraines or "migraine auras without headache," typically cause symptoms that accompany the phases of a migraine, but without the classic headache pain. It is most common among young adults in their 20s and 30s and older adults between 40 and 60 years of age, especially in those who had auras accompanied by migraine headaches when younger. 

According to the International Headache Society, a migraine aura develops gradually over 5 to 10 minutes and lasts for less than 1 hour. Although the symptoms of a silent migraine may vary from person to person, visual symptoms occur in more than 90% of migraine auras. Visual symptoms may also be accompanied by other neurologic symptoms such as dizziness, numbness or tingling, and aphasia. The most common visual symptoms are positive symptoms, such as flash scotoma, visual distortion, colored spots, and flash hallucinations. Visual symptoms may easily be confused with symptoms of a transient ischemic attack (TIA). However, migraine auras generally last 15 to 30 minutes. They are often described as dynamic, bright, multicolored forms in geometric patterns. In contrast, the visual symptoms of a TIA last on average 3 to 10 minutes and are described as a static, dark dimming of vision. 

The diagnosis of migraine aura without headache should be made after all other possible causes have been excluded, particularly TIAs and focal seizures because of the diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic implications. Testing may include a neurologic and eye examination, MRI, CT angiography, and laboratory testing for clotting disorders. 

Migraine aura without headache is a benign condition and generally does not require treatment. When symptoms of silent migraines are severe enough, low-dose aspirin and calcium-channel blockers may be considered as treatment options. However, triptans, which are often used in patients with migraine headaches, should not be used to treat silent migraines because they do not act fast enough to affect an aura. In addition, triptans should be used with caution in older patients, who may have vascular disease, hypertension, and other cardiovascular risk factors. 
 

Jasmin Harpe, MD, MPH, Headache Fellow, Department of Neurology, Harvard University, John R. Graham Headache Center, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA

Jasmin Harpe, MD, MPH, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Migraine is one of the most common neurologic diseases, affecting about 14% of the population. Migraines may also be associated with auras or visual or sensory symptoms that precede the headache. However, approximately 4% of people with migraine experience their usual migraines and sometimes also experience episodes of an aura that is not followed by a headache. Silent migraines, also known as acephalgic migraines or "migraine auras without headache," typically cause symptoms that accompany the phases of a migraine, but without the classic headache pain. It is most common among young adults in their 20s and 30s and older adults between 40 and 60 years of age, especially in those who had auras accompanied by migraine headaches when younger. 

According to the International Headache Society, a migraine aura develops gradually over 5 to 10 minutes and lasts for less than 1 hour. Although the symptoms of a silent migraine may vary from person to person, visual symptoms occur in more than 90% of migraine auras. Visual symptoms may also be accompanied by other neurologic symptoms such as dizziness, numbness or tingling, and aphasia. The most common visual symptoms are positive symptoms, such as flash scotoma, visual distortion, colored spots, and flash hallucinations. Visual symptoms may easily be confused with symptoms of a transient ischemic attack (TIA). However, migraine auras generally last 15 to 30 minutes. They are often described as dynamic, bright, multicolored forms in geometric patterns. In contrast, the visual symptoms of a TIA last on average 3 to 10 minutes and are described as a static, dark dimming of vision. 

The diagnosis of migraine aura without headache should be made after all other possible causes have been excluded, particularly TIAs and focal seizures because of the diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic implications. Testing may include a neurologic and eye examination, MRI, CT angiography, and laboratory testing for clotting disorders. 

Migraine aura without headache is a benign condition and generally does not require treatment. When symptoms of silent migraines are severe enough, low-dose aspirin and calcium-channel blockers may be considered as treatment options. However, triptans, which are often used in patients with migraine headaches, should not be used to treat silent migraines because they do not act fast enough to affect an aura. In addition, triptans should be used with caution in older patients, who may have vascular disease, hypertension, and other cardiovascular risk factors. 
 

Jasmin Harpe, MD, MPH, Headache Fellow, Department of Neurology, Harvard University, John R. Graham Headache Center, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA

Jasmin Harpe, MD, MPH, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is consistent with the patient's joint pain, dactylitis, enthesitis, skin plaques, and radiographic findings, making it the most likely diagnosis. 

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is possible because of the patient's joint symptoms; however, it is not the correct answer because of negative RF and ACPA tests and skin plaques. 

Osteoarthritis might cause joint pain but does not typically present with prolonged morning stiffness, skin plaques, or the "pencil-in-cup" radiographic finding. 

Gout, an inflammatory arthritis, primarily affects the big toe and does not align with the patient's skin and radiographic manifestations. 

PsA is a chronic inflammatory arthritis that often develops in people with psoriasis. It affects roughly 0.05%- 0.25% of the general population and up to 41% of people with psoriasis. PsA is most seen in White patients between 35 and 55 years and affects both men and women equally. PsA is linked to a higher risk for obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and other conditions, including uveitis and inflammatory bowel disease.

Clinically, PsA presents with a diverse range of manifestations, encompassing peripheral joint inflammation, often with an asymmetric distribution; axial skeletal involvement reminiscent of spondylitis; dactylitis characterized by sausage-like swelling of fingers or toes; and enthesitis. Common symptoms or findings include early morning stiffness for > 30 minutes; joint pain, tenderness, and swelling; back pain aggravated by rest and relieved by exercise; limited joint motion; and deformity. Although most patients have a preceding condition in skin psoriasis, diagnosis of PsA is often delayed. Furthermore, nearly 80% of patients may exhibit nail changes, such as pitting or onycholysis, compared with about 40% of patients with psoriasis without arthritis. The heterogeneity of its clinical features often necessitates a comprehensive differential diagnosis to distinguish PsA from other spondyloarthropathies and rheumatic diseases. The most accepted classification criteria for PsA are the Classification of Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria, which have been used since 2006.

No laboratory tests are specific for PsA; however, a normal ESR and CRP level should not be used to rule out a diagnosis of PsA because these values are increased in only about 40% of patients. RF and ACPA are classically considered absent in PsA, and a negative RF is regarded as a criterion for diagnosing PsA per the CASPAR classification criteria. Radiographic changes show some characteristic patterns in PsA, including erosive damage, gross joint destruction, joint space narrowing, and "pencil-in-cup" deformity.

PsA treatment options have evolved over the years. Whereas in the past, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and cyclosporine were commonly prescribed, the development of immunologically targeted biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs since 2000 has revolutionized the treatment of PsA. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (ie, etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab) have been shown to improve all domains (psoriatic and articular disease) of PsA and are considered a milestone in managing the condition. Other emerging therapeutic strategies in recent years have demonstrated efficacy in treating PsA, including monoclonal antibodies targeting interleukin (IL)-12, IL-23, and IL-17, as well as small-molecule phosphodiesterase 4 and Janus kinase inhibitors.

Although most of these options have the potential to be effective in all clinical domains of the disease, their cross-domain efficacy can vary from patient to patient. In some cases, treatment may not be practical or can lose effectiveness over time, and true disease remission is rare. As a result, clinicians must regularly assess each domain and aim to achieve remission or low disease activity across the different active domains while also being aware of potential adverse events.

Alan Irvine, MD, DSc, Consultant Dermatologist, ADI Dermatology LTD, Dublin, Ireland

Alan Irvine, MD, DSc, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant, or trustee for: Sanofi; Abbvie; Regeneron; Leo; Pfizer; Janssen.
Serve(d) as a speaker or member of a speakers bureau for: Sanofi; Abbvie; Regeneron; Leo; Pfizer; Janssen.

Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Sanofi; Abbvie; Regeneron; Leo; Pfizer; Janssen.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.
 

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is consistent with the patient's joint pain, dactylitis, enthesitis, skin plaques, and radiographic findings, making it the most likely diagnosis. 

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is possible because of the patient's joint symptoms; however, it is not the correct answer because of negative RF and ACPA tests and skin plaques. 

Osteoarthritis might cause joint pain but does not typically present with prolonged morning stiffness, skin plaques, or the "pencil-in-cup" radiographic finding. 

Gout, an inflammatory arthritis, primarily affects the big toe and does not align with the patient's skin and radiographic manifestations. 

PsA is a chronic inflammatory arthritis that often develops in people with psoriasis. It affects roughly 0.05%- 0.25% of the general population and up to 41% of people with psoriasis. PsA is most seen in White patients between 35 and 55 years and affects both men and women equally. PsA is linked to a higher risk for obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and other conditions, including uveitis and inflammatory bowel disease.

Clinically, PsA presents with a diverse range of manifestations, encompassing peripheral joint inflammation, often with an asymmetric distribution; axial skeletal involvement reminiscent of spondylitis; dactylitis characterized by sausage-like swelling of fingers or toes; and enthesitis. Common symptoms or findings include early morning stiffness for > 30 minutes; joint pain, tenderness, and swelling; back pain aggravated by rest and relieved by exercise; limited joint motion; and deformity. Although most patients have a preceding condition in skin psoriasis, diagnosis of PsA is often delayed. Furthermore, nearly 80% of patients may exhibit nail changes, such as pitting or onycholysis, compared with about 40% of patients with psoriasis without arthritis. The heterogeneity of its clinical features often necessitates a comprehensive differential diagnosis to distinguish PsA from other spondyloarthropathies and rheumatic diseases. The most accepted classification criteria for PsA are the Classification of Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria, which have been used since 2006.

No laboratory tests are specific for PsA; however, a normal ESR and CRP level should not be used to rule out a diagnosis of PsA because these values are increased in only about 40% of patients. RF and ACPA are classically considered absent in PsA, and a negative RF is regarded as a criterion for diagnosing PsA per the CASPAR classification criteria. Radiographic changes show some characteristic patterns in PsA, including erosive damage, gross joint destruction, joint space narrowing, and "pencil-in-cup" deformity.

PsA treatment options have evolved over the years. Whereas in the past, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and cyclosporine were commonly prescribed, the development of immunologically targeted biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs since 2000 has revolutionized the treatment of PsA. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (ie, etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab) have been shown to improve all domains (psoriatic and articular disease) of PsA and are considered a milestone in managing the condition. Other emerging therapeutic strategies in recent years have demonstrated efficacy in treating PsA, including monoclonal antibodies targeting interleukin (IL)-12, IL-23, and IL-17, as well as small-molecule phosphodiesterase 4 and Janus kinase inhibitors.

Although most of these options have the potential to be effective in all clinical domains of the disease, their cross-domain efficacy can vary from patient to patient. In some cases, treatment may not be practical or can lose effectiveness over time, and true disease remission is rare. As a result, clinicians must regularly assess each domain and aim to achieve remission or low disease activity across the different active domains while also being aware of potential adverse events.

Alan Irvine, MD, DSc, Consultant Dermatologist, ADI Dermatology LTD, Dublin, Ireland

Alan Irvine, MD, DSc, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant, or trustee for: Sanofi; Abbvie; Regeneron; Leo; Pfizer; Janssen.
Serve(d) as a speaker or member of a speakers bureau for: Sanofi; Abbvie; Regeneron; Leo; Pfizer; Janssen.

Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Sanofi; Abbvie; Regeneron; Leo; Pfizer; Janssen.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.
 

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is consistent with the patient's joint pain, dactylitis, enthesitis, skin plaques, and radiographic findings, making it the most likely diagnosis. 

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is possible because of the patient's joint symptoms; however, it is not the correct answer because of negative RF and ACPA tests and skin plaques. 

Osteoarthritis might cause joint pain but does not typically present with prolonged morning stiffness, skin plaques, or the "pencil-in-cup" radiographic finding. 

Gout, an inflammatory arthritis, primarily affects the big toe and does not align with the patient's skin and radiographic manifestations. 

PsA is a chronic inflammatory arthritis that often develops in people with psoriasis. It affects roughly 0.05%- 0.25% of the general population and up to 41% of people with psoriasis. PsA is most seen in White patients between 35 and 55 years and affects both men and women equally. PsA is linked to a higher risk for obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and other conditions, including uveitis and inflammatory bowel disease.

Clinically, PsA presents with a diverse range of manifestations, encompassing peripheral joint inflammation, often with an asymmetric distribution; axial skeletal involvement reminiscent of spondylitis; dactylitis characterized by sausage-like swelling of fingers or toes; and enthesitis. Common symptoms or findings include early morning stiffness for > 30 minutes; joint pain, tenderness, and swelling; back pain aggravated by rest and relieved by exercise; limited joint motion; and deformity. Although most patients have a preceding condition in skin psoriasis, diagnosis of PsA is often delayed. Furthermore, nearly 80% of patients may exhibit nail changes, such as pitting or onycholysis, compared with about 40% of patients with psoriasis without arthritis. The heterogeneity of its clinical features often necessitates a comprehensive differential diagnosis to distinguish PsA from other spondyloarthropathies and rheumatic diseases. The most accepted classification criteria for PsA are the Classification of Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria, which have been used since 2006.

No laboratory tests are specific for PsA; however, a normal ESR and CRP level should not be used to rule out a diagnosis of PsA because these values are increased in only about 40% of patients. RF and ACPA are classically considered absent in PsA, and a negative RF is regarded as a criterion for diagnosing PsA per the CASPAR classification criteria. Radiographic changes show some characteristic patterns in PsA, including erosive damage, gross joint destruction, joint space narrowing, and "pencil-in-cup" deformity.

PsA treatment options have evolved over the years. Whereas in the past, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and cyclosporine were commonly prescribed, the development of immunologically targeted biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs since 2000 has revolutionized the treatment of PsA. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (ie, etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab) have been shown to improve all domains (psoriatic and articular disease) of PsA and are considered a milestone in managing the condition. Other emerging therapeutic strategies in recent years have demonstrated efficacy in treating PsA, including monoclonal antibodies targeting interleukin (IL)-12, IL-23, and IL-17, as well as small-molecule phosphodiesterase 4 and Janus kinase inhibitors.

Although most of these options have the potential to be effective in all clinical domains of the disease, their cross-domain efficacy can vary from patient to patient. In some cases, treatment may not be practical or can lose effectiveness over time, and true disease remission is rare. As a result, clinicians must regularly assess each domain and aim to achieve remission or low disease activity across the different active domains while also being aware of potential adverse events.

Alan Irvine, MD, DSc, Consultant Dermatologist, ADI Dermatology LTD, Dublin, Ireland

Alan Irvine, MD, DSc, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships:
Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant, or trustee for: Sanofi; Abbvie; Regeneron; Leo; Pfizer; Janssen.
Serve(d) as a speaker or member of a speakers bureau for: Sanofi; Abbvie; Regeneron; Leo; Pfizer; Janssen.

Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Sanofi; Abbvie; Regeneron; Leo; Pfizer; Janssen.

Image Quizzes are fictional or fictionalized clinical scenarios intended to provide evidence-based educational takeaways.