User login
Best treatment approach for early stage follicular lymphoma is unclear
Randomized trials are needed to determine the optimal treatment approach for early stage follicular lymphoma (FL), according to researchers.
A retrospective study showed similar outcomes among patients who received radiotherapy, immunochemotherapy, combined modality treatment (CMT), and watchful waiting (WW).
There were some differences in progression-free survival (PFS) according to treatment approach. However, there were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) between any of the active treatments or between patients who received active treatment and those managed with WW.
Joshua W. D. Tobin, MD, of Princess Alexandra Hospital in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, and colleagues conducted this research and reported the results in Blood Advances.
The researchers analyzed 365 patients with newly diagnosed, stage I/II FL. The patients had a median age of 63 years and more than half were men. They were diagnosed between 2005 and 2017, and the median follow-up was 45 months.
Most patients (n = 280) received active treatment, but 85 were managed with WW. The WW patients were older and had more extranodal involvement.
Types of active treatment included radiotherapy alone (n = 171), immunochemotherapy alone (n = 63), and CMT (n = 46). Compared with the other groups, patients who received radiotherapy alone had less bulk, fewer nodal sites, and fewer B symptoms, and were more likely to have stage I disease. Patients who received CMT had fewer B symptoms and lower FLIPI scores compared with patients who received immunochemotherapy.
The immunochemotherapy regimens used were largely rituximab based. In all, 106 patients received rituximab (alone or in combination) for induction, and 49 received maintenance rituximab (37 in the immunochemotherapy group and 12 in the CMT group).
Results
Response rates were similar among the active treatment groups. The overall response rate was 95% in the radiotherapy group, 96% in the immunochemotherapy group, and 95% in the CMT group (P = .87).
There was a significant difference in PFS between the radiotherapy, immunochemotherapy, and CMT groups (P = .023), but there was no difference in OS between these groups (P = .38).
There was no significant difference in PFS between the immunochemotherapy and CMT groups (hazard ratio [HR], 1.78; P = .24), so the researchers combined these groups into a single group called “systemic therapy.” The patients treated with systemic therapy had PFS (HR, 1.32; P = .96) and OS (HR, 0.46; P = .21) similar to that of patients treated with radiotherapy alone.
Maintenance rituximab was associated with prolonged PFS among patients treated with systemic therapy (HR, 0.24; P = .017). However, there was no significant difference in OS between patients who received maintenance and those who did not (HR, 0.89; P = .90).
Relapse was less common among patients who received maintenance, and there were no cases of transformation in that group. Relapse occurred in 24.6% of the radiotherapy group, 18.3% of the systemic therapy group, and 4.1% of the group that received systemic therapy plus maintenance (P = .006). Transformation was less likely in the systemic therapy group (1.8%) than in the radiotherapy (6.4%) and WW (9.4%) groups (HR, 0.20; P = .034).
Overall, the active treatment group had better PFS than the WW group (HR, 0.52; P = .002), but there was no significant difference in OS between the groups (HR, 0.94; P = .90).
“Based on our comparable OS between WW and actively treated patients, WW could be considered as an initial management strategy in early stage FL,” Dr. Tobin and colleagues wrote. “However, long-term follow-up is required to determine if a survival benefit exists favoring active treatment.”
The researchers reported relationships with many pharmaceutical companies.
SOURCE: Tobin JWD et al. Blood Adv. 2019 Oct 8;3(19):2804-11.
Randomized trials are needed to determine the optimal treatment approach for early stage follicular lymphoma (FL), according to researchers.
A retrospective study showed similar outcomes among patients who received radiotherapy, immunochemotherapy, combined modality treatment (CMT), and watchful waiting (WW).
There were some differences in progression-free survival (PFS) according to treatment approach. However, there were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) between any of the active treatments or between patients who received active treatment and those managed with WW.
Joshua W. D. Tobin, MD, of Princess Alexandra Hospital in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, and colleagues conducted this research and reported the results in Blood Advances.
The researchers analyzed 365 patients with newly diagnosed, stage I/II FL. The patients had a median age of 63 years and more than half were men. They were diagnosed between 2005 and 2017, and the median follow-up was 45 months.
Most patients (n = 280) received active treatment, but 85 were managed with WW. The WW patients were older and had more extranodal involvement.
Types of active treatment included radiotherapy alone (n = 171), immunochemotherapy alone (n = 63), and CMT (n = 46). Compared with the other groups, patients who received radiotherapy alone had less bulk, fewer nodal sites, and fewer B symptoms, and were more likely to have stage I disease. Patients who received CMT had fewer B symptoms and lower FLIPI scores compared with patients who received immunochemotherapy.
The immunochemotherapy regimens used were largely rituximab based. In all, 106 patients received rituximab (alone or in combination) for induction, and 49 received maintenance rituximab (37 in the immunochemotherapy group and 12 in the CMT group).
Results
Response rates were similar among the active treatment groups. The overall response rate was 95% in the radiotherapy group, 96% in the immunochemotherapy group, and 95% in the CMT group (P = .87).
There was a significant difference in PFS between the radiotherapy, immunochemotherapy, and CMT groups (P = .023), but there was no difference in OS between these groups (P = .38).
There was no significant difference in PFS between the immunochemotherapy and CMT groups (hazard ratio [HR], 1.78; P = .24), so the researchers combined these groups into a single group called “systemic therapy.” The patients treated with systemic therapy had PFS (HR, 1.32; P = .96) and OS (HR, 0.46; P = .21) similar to that of patients treated with radiotherapy alone.
Maintenance rituximab was associated with prolonged PFS among patients treated with systemic therapy (HR, 0.24; P = .017). However, there was no significant difference in OS between patients who received maintenance and those who did not (HR, 0.89; P = .90).
Relapse was less common among patients who received maintenance, and there were no cases of transformation in that group. Relapse occurred in 24.6% of the radiotherapy group, 18.3% of the systemic therapy group, and 4.1% of the group that received systemic therapy plus maintenance (P = .006). Transformation was less likely in the systemic therapy group (1.8%) than in the radiotherapy (6.4%) and WW (9.4%) groups (HR, 0.20; P = .034).
Overall, the active treatment group had better PFS than the WW group (HR, 0.52; P = .002), but there was no significant difference in OS between the groups (HR, 0.94; P = .90).
“Based on our comparable OS between WW and actively treated patients, WW could be considered as an initial management strategy in early stage FL,” Dr. Tobin and colleagues wrote. “However, long-term follow-up is required to determine if a survival benefit exists favoring active treatment.”
The researchers reported relationships with many pharmaceutical companies.
SOURCE: Tobin JWD et al. Blood Adv. 2019 Oct 8;3(19):2804-11.
Randomized trials are needed to determine the optimal treatment approach for early stage follicular lymphoma (FL), according to researchers.
A retrospective study showed similar outcomes among patients who received radiotherapy, immunochemotherapy, combined modality treatment (CMT), and watchful waiting (WW).
There were some differences in progression-free survival (PFS) according to treatment approach. However, there were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) between any of the active treatments or between patients who received active treatment and those managed with WW.
Joshua W. D. Tobin, MD, of Princess Alexandra Hospital in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, and colleagues conducted this research and reported the results in Blood Advances.
The researchers analyzed 365 patients with newly diagnosed, stage I/II FL. The patients had a median age of 63 years and more than half were men. They were diagnosed between 2005 and 2017, and the median follow-up was 45 months.
Most patients (n = 280) received active treatment, but 85 were managed with WW. The WW patients were older and had more extranodal involvement.
Types of active treatment included radiotherapy alone (n = 171), immunochemotherapy alone (n = 63), and CMT (n = 46). Compared with the other groups, patients who received radiotherapy alone had less bulk, fewer nodal sites, and fewer B symptoms, and were more likely to have stage I disease. Patients who received CMT had fewer B symptoms and lower FLIPI scores compared with patients who received immunochemotherapy.
The immunochemotherapy regimens used were largely rituximab based. In all, 106 patients received rituximab (alone or in combination) for induction, and 49 received maintenance rituximab (37 in the immunochemotherapy group and 12 in the CMT group).
Results
Response rates were similar among the active treatment groups. The overall response rate was 95% in the radiotherapy group, 96% in the immunochemotherapy group, and 95% in the CMT group (P = .87).
There was a significant difference in PFS between the radiotherapy, immunochemotherapy, and CMT groups (P = .023), but there was no difference in OS between these groups (P = .38).
There was no significant difference in PFS between the immunochemotherapy and CMT groups (hazard ratio [HR], 1.78; P = .24), so the researchers combined these groups into a single group called “systemic therapy.” The patients treated with systemic therapy had PFS (HR, 1.32; P = .96) and OS (HR, 0.46; P = .21) similar to that of patients treated with radiotherapy alone.
Maintenance rituximab was associated with prolonged PFS among patients treated with systemic therapy (HR, 0.24; P = .017). However, there was no significant difference in OS between patients who received maintenance and those who did not (HR, 0.89; P = .90).
Relapse was less common among patients who received maintenance, and there were no cases of transformation in that group. Relapse occurred in 24.6% of the radiotherapy group, 18.3% of the systemic therapy group, and 4.1% of the group that received systemic therapy plus maintenance (P = .006). Transformation was less likely in the systemic therapy group (1.8%) than in the radiotherapy (6.4%) and WW (9.4%) groups (HR, 0.20; P = .034).
Overall, the active treatment group had better PFS than the WW group (HR, 0.52; P = .002), but there was no significant difference in OS between the groups (HR, 0.94; P = .90).
“Based on our comparable OS between WW and actively treated patients, WW could be considered as an initial management strategy in early stage FL,” Dr. Tobin and colleagues wrote. “However, long-term follow-up is required to determine if a survival benefit exists favoring active treatment.”
The researchers reported relationships with many pharmaceutical companies.
SOURCE: Tobin JWD et al. Blood Adv. 2019 Oct 8;3(19):2804-11.
FROM BLOOD ADVANCES
ASCT may cure follicular lymphoma for some rituximab-naive patients
Prompt autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is often curative in rituximab-naive patients with follicular lymphoma who have experienced early failure of first-line therapy and achieved a response to second-line therapy, suggest results from a registry-based study conducted by GELTAMO (the Spanish Lymphoma and Bone Marrow Transplant Group).
“Overall, our results suggest that, whereas some patients might benefit from more aggressive therapies, such as allogenic stem cell transplantations, or novel drugs, such as immunomodulatory agents, monoclonal antibodies, phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, or even the application of bispecific T-cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, there are a considerable number of patients in this high-risk [early therapy failure] subgroup that can be cured with ASCT, even in the absence of rituximab,” Ana Jiménez-Ubieto, MD, PhD, of the Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, and colleagues wrote.
The results are more favorable when ASCT is performed in patients experiencing early therapy failure, with less than 1 year from first relapse after primary treatment to ASCT.
“Early ASCT could be a hopeful option in patients with difficult access to rituximab,” the researchers wrote in Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy.
Patients with follicular lymphoma who experience relapse or progression during or soon after first-line therapy have poor overall survival, and there is no standard therapy for this population, according to the researchers. Previous research has shown that ASCT prolongs survival in those who have received rituximab before transplantation, but benefit in the absence of this agent is unknown.
Dr. Jiménez-Ubieto and colleagues conducted a multicenter registry-based retrospective cohort study of 134 patients with nontransformed follicular lymphoma who underwent ASCT during 1989-2007 while in second complete or partial response to rescue chemotherapy and had not received rituximab.
Overall, 65% of the patients had experienced early therapy failure (relapse or progression within 2 years of starting first-line chemotherapy). Within this group, 78% underwent ASCT within 1 year, and 67% underwent ASCT while in second complete response. Median posttransplantation follow-up for the entire study cohort was 13.4 years.
Study results showed that patients who had experienced early therapy failure versus who had not had poorer 5-year progression-free survival (43% vs. 57%; P = .048) but similar 5-year overall survival (69% vs. 77%; P = .4). However, those patients with early therapy failure who underwent ASCT within 1 year had a statistically indistinguishable 5-year progression-free survival relative to counterparts without early therapy failure (48% vs. 66%; P = .44).
Additionally, the 48% progression-free survival seen in this subset was almost identical to the 49% seen in a historical cohort of patients with early therapy failure who similarly underwent ASCT within 1 year of first relapse but received rituximab before transplantation (Hematol Oncol. 2018;36[5]:765-72). This suggests “that the possible synergistic effect of rituximab plus ASCT is not as relevant if ASCT is offered soon in the course of the disease,” the researchers wrote.
Patients who had experienced early therapy failure achieved better overall survival if they underwent ASCT while in second complete response, as opposed to second partial response. Notably, 56% of those who underwent ASCT while in second complete response were alive at 13.7 years of follow-up and remained so long term.
The study was funded by the Foundation Research Institute at the Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. The researchers reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Jiménez-Ubieto A et al. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2019 Jul 9. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2019.06.001.
Prompt autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is often curative in rituximab-naive patients with follicular lymphoma who have experienced early failure of first-line therapy and achieved a response to second-line therapy, suggest results from a registry-based study conducted by GELTAMO (the Spanish Lymphoma and Bone Marrow Transplant Group).
“Overall, our results suggest that, whereas some patients might benefit from more aggressive therapies, such as allogenic stem cell transplantations, or novel drugs, such as immunomodulatory agents, monoclonal antibodies, phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, or even the application of bispecific T-cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, there are a considerable number of patients in this high-risk [early therapy failure] subgroup that can be cured with ASCT, even in the absence of rituximab,” Ana Jiménez-Ubieto, MD, PhD, of the Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, and colleagues wrote.
The results are more favorable when ASCT is performed in patients experiencing early therapy failure, with less than 1 year from first relapse after primary treatment to ASCT.
“Early ASCT could be a hopeful option in patients with difficult access to rituximab,” the researchers wrote in Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy.
Patients with follicular lymphoma who experience relapse or progression during or soon after first-line therapy have poor overall survival, and there is no standard therapy for this population, according to the researchers. Previous research has shown that ASCT prolongs survival in those who have received rituximab before transplantation, but benefit in the absence of this agent is unknown.
Dr. Jiménez-Ubieto and colleagues conducted a multicenter registry-based retrospective cohort study of 134 patients with nontransformed follicular lymphoma who underwent ASCT during 1989-2007 while in second complete or partial response to rescue chemotherapy and had not received rituximab.
Overall, 65% of the patients had experienced early therapy failure (relapse or progression within 2 years of starting first-line chemotherapy). Within this group, 78% underwent ASCT within 1 year, and 67% underwent ASCT while in second complete response. Median posttransplantation follow-up for the entire study cohort was 13.4 years.
Study results showed that patients who had experienced early therapy failure versus who had not had poorer 5-year progression-free survival (43% vs. 57%; P = .048) but similar 5-year overall survival (69% vs. 77%; P = .4). However, those patients with early therapy failure who underwent ASCT within 1 year had a statistically indistinguishable 5-year progression-free survival relative to counterparts without early therapy failure (48% vs. 66%; P = .44).
Additionally, the 48% progression-free survival seen in this subset was almost identical to the 49% seen in a historical cohort of patients with early therapy failure who similarly underwent ASCT within 1 year of first relapse but received rituximab before transplantation (Hematol Oncol. 2018;36[5]:765-72). This suggests “that the possible synergistic effect of rituximab plus ASCT is not as relevant if ASCT is offered soon in the course of the disease,” the researchers wrote.
Patients who had experienced early therapy failure achieved better overall survival if they underwent ASCT while in second complete response, as opposed to second partial response. Notably, 56% of those who underwent ASCT while in second complete response were alive at 13.7 years of follow-up and remained so long term.
The study was funded by the Foundation Research Institute at the Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. The researchers reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Jiménez-Ubieto A et al. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2019 Jul 9. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2019.06.001.
Prompt autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is often curative in rituximab-naive patients with follicular lymphoma who have experienced early failure of first-line therapy and achieved a response to second-line therapy, suggest results from a registry-based study conducted by GELTAMO (the Spanish Lymphoma and Bone Marrow Transplant Group).
“Overall, our results suggest that, whereas some patients might benefit from more aggressive therapies, such as allogenic stem cell transplantations, or novel drugs, such as immunomodulatory agents, monoclonal antibodies, phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, or even the application of bispecific T-cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, there are a considerable number of patients in this high-risk [early therapy failure] subgroup that can be cured with ASCT, even in the absence of rituximab,” Ana Jiménez-Ubieto, MD, PhD, of the Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, and colleagues wrote.
The results are more favorable when ASCT is performed in patients experiencing early therapy failure, with less than 1 year from first relapse after primary treatment to ASCT.
“Early ASCT could be a hopeful option in patients with difficult access to rituximab,” the researchers wrote in Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy.
Patients with follicular lymphoma who experience relapse or progression during or soon after first-line therapy have poor overall survival, and there is no standard therapy for this population, according to the researchers. Previous research has shown that ASCT prolongs survival in those who have received rituximab before transplantation, but benefit in the absence of this agent is unknown.
Dr. Jiménez-Ubieto and colleagues conducted a multicenter registry-based retrospective cohort study of 134 patients with nontransformed follicular lymphoma who underwent ASCT during 1989-2007 while in second complete or partial response to rescue chemotherapy and had not received rituximab.
Overall, 65% of the patients had experienced early therapy failure (relapse or progression within 2 years of starting first-line chemotherapy). Within this group, 78% underwent ASCT within 1 year, and 67% underwent ASCT while in second complete response. Median posttransplantation follow-up for the entire study cohort was 13.4 years.
Study results showed that patients who had experienced early therapy failure versus who had not had poorer 5-year progression-free survival (43% vs. 57%; P = .048) but similar 5-year overall survival (69% vs. 77%; P = .4). However, those patients with early therapy failure who underwent ASCT within 1 year had a statistically indistinguishable 5-year progression-free survival relative to counterparts without early therapy failure (48% vs. 66%; P = .44).
Additionally, the 48% progression-free survival seen in this subset was almost identical to the 49% seen in a historical cohort of patients with early therapy failure who similarly underwent ASCT within 1 year of first relapse but received rituximab before transplantation (Hematol Oncol. 2018;36[5]:765-72). This suggests “that the possible synergistic effect of rituximab plus ASCT is not as relevant if ASCT is offered soon in the course of the disease,” the researchers wrote.
Patients who had experienced early therapy failure achieved better overall survival if they underwent ASCT while in second complete response, as opposed to second partial response. Notably, 56% of those who underwent ASCT while in second complete response were alive at 13.7 years of follow-up and remained so long term.
The study was funded by the Foundation Research Institute at the Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. The researchers reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Jiménez-Ubieto A et al. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2019 Jul 9. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2019.06.001.
FROM HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY AND STEM CELL THERAPY
Obinutuzumab-lenalidomide combo shows promise in relapsed/refractory FL
Obinutuzumab plus lenalidomide showed manageable safety and activity in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL), according to results from a phase 2 trial.
“The results of this phase 2 study show that induction therapy with obinutuzumab and lenalidomide followed by maintenance therapy with obinutuzumab is effective for many patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma,” wrote Franck Morschhauser, MD, PhD, of the University of Lille, France, and colleagues. The results were published in The Lancet Haematology.
The multicenter, single-arm study comprised 89 patients, 88 of whom were assessed for safety and 86 for efficacy. All eligible study patients received a minimum of one prior rituximab-based therapy before receiving obinutuzumab.
Study participants received intravenous obinutuzumab 1,000 mg for six 28-day cycles, in addition to oral lenalidomide 20 mg as induction therapy.
Maintenance therapy (year 1) consisted of oral lenalidomide 10 mg on days 2-22 of each cycle for a maximum of 12 28-day cycles plus obinutuzumab 1,000 mg on day 1 of alternate cycles (total of six infusions). Maintenance therapy (year 2) consisted of obinutuzumab 1,000 mg alone on day 1 for six 56-day cycles.
The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved an overall response at the end of induction therapy. Secondary outcomes included various survival parameters and safety.
After analysis, the researchers found that the proportion of patients who achieved an overall response at induction end was 79% (95% confidence interval, 69-87). In addition, 38% of patients (95% CI, 28-50) had achieved a complete response at the end of induction therapy.
The progression-free survival, event-free survival, and overall survival rates were 65% (95% CI, 54-74), 62% (95% CI, 51-72), and 87% (95% CI, 78-93), respectively, at 2 years (no P values were reported).
“The results suggest that obinutuzumab plus lenalidomide is active as shown by 2-year outcomes (progression-free survival and overall survival) in the overall patient group,” the researchers wrote.
With respect to safety, basal cell carcinoma (6%), febrile neutropenia (5%), and infusion-related reactions (3%) were the most frequently reported serious toxicities. One patient died because of therapy-related febrile neutropenia.
The Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation, Celgene, and Roche funded the study. The authors reported financial affiliations with the study sponsors and several other companies.
SOURCE: Morschhauser F et al. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Jul 8. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30089-4.
Obinutuzumab plus lenalidomide showed manageable safety and activity in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL), according to results from a phase 2 trial.
“The results of this phase 2 study show that induction therapy with obinutuzumab and lenalidomide followed by maintenance therapy with obinutuzumab is effective for many patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma,” wrote Franck Morschhauser, MD, PhD, of the University of Lille, France, and colleagues. The results were published in The Lancet Haematology.
The multicenter, single-arm study comprised 89 patients, 88 of whom were assessed for safety and 86 for efficacy. All eligible study patients received a minimum of one prior rituximab-based therapy before receiving obinutuzumab.
Study participants received intravenous obinutuzumab 1,000 mg for six 28-day cycles, in addition to oral lenalidomide 20 mg as induction therapy.
Maintenance therapy (year 1) consisted of oral lenalidomide 10 mg on days 2-22 of each cycle for a maximum of 12 28-day cycles plus obinutuzumab 1,000 mg on day 1 of alternate cycles (total of six infusions). Maintenance therapy (year 2) consisted of obinutuzumab 1,000 mg alone on day 1 for six 56-day cycles.
The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved an overall response at the end of induction therapy. Secondary outcomes included various survival parameters and safety.
After analysis, the researchers found that the proportion of patients who achieved an overall response at induction end was 79% (95% confidence interval, 69-87). In addition, 38% of patients (95% CI, 28-50) had achieved a complete response at the end of induction therapy.
The progression-free survival, event-free survival, and overall survival rates were 65% (95% CI, 54-74), 62% (95% CI, 51-72), and 87% (95% CI, 78-93), respectively, at 2 years (no P values were reported).
“The results suggest that obinutuzumab plus lenalidomide is active as shown by 2-year outcomes (progression-free survival and overall survival) in the overall patient group,” the researchers wrote.
With respect to safety, basal cell carcinoma (6%), febrile neutropenia (5%), and infusion-related reactions (3%) were the most frequently reported serious toxicities. One patient died because of therapy-related febrile neutropenia.
The Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation, Celgene, and Roche funded the study. The authors reported financial affiliations with the study sponsors and several other companies.
SOURCE: Morschhauser F et al. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Jul 8. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30089-4.
Obinutuzumab plus lenalidomide showed manageable safety and activity in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL), according to results from a phase 2 trial.
“The results of this phase 2 study show that induction therapy with obinutuzumab and lenalidomide followed by maintenance therapy with obinutuzumab is effective for many patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma,” wrote Franck Morschhauser, MD, PhD, of the University of Lille, France, and colleagues. The results were published in The Lancet Haematology.
The multicenter, single-arm study comprised 89 patients, 88 of whom were assessed for safety and 86 for efficacy. All eligible study patients received a minimum of one prior rituximab-based therapy before receiving obinutuzumab.
Study participants received intravenous obinutuzumab 1,000 mg for six 28-day cycles, in addition to oral lenalidomide 20 mg as induction therapy.
Maintenance therapy (year 1) consisted of oral lenalidomide 10 mg on days 2-22 of each cycle for a maximum of 12 28-day cycles plus obinutuzumab 1,000 mg on day 1 of alternate cycles (total of six infusions). Maintenance therapy (year 2) consisted of obinutuzumab 1,000 mg alone on day 1 for six 56-day cycles.
The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved an overall response at the end of induction therapy. Secondary outcomes included various survival parameters and safety.
After analysis, the researchers found that the proportion of patients who achieved an overall response at induction end was 79% (95% confidence interval, 69-87). In addition, 38% of patients (95% CI, 28-50) had achieved a complete response at the end of induction therapy.
The progression-free survival, event-free survival, and overall survival rates were 65% (95% CI, 54-74), 62% (95% CI, 51-72), and 87% (95% CI, 78-93), respectively, at 2 years (no P values were reported).
“The results suggest that obinutuzumab plus lenalidomide is active as shown by 2-year outcomes (progression-free survival and overall survival) in the overall patient group,” the researchers wrote.
With respect to safety, basal cell carcinoma (6%), febrile neutropenia (5%), and infusion-related reactions (3%) were the most frequently reported serious toxicities. One patient died because of therapy-related febrile neutropenia.
The Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation, Celgene, and Roche funded the study. The authors reported financial affiliations with the study sponsors and several other companies.
SOURCE: Morschhauser F et al. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Jul 8. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30089-4.
FROM THE LANCET HAEMATOLOGY
FDA approves rituximab biosimilar for cancer, autoimmune disorders
The Food and Drug Administration has approved rituximab-pvvr (Ruxience) for adults with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. It is the first biosimilar approved to treat these two rare autoimmune conditions.
Specifically, the biosimilar product is approved as single-agent therapy for relapsed or refractory, low grade or follicular, CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma; in combination with chemotherapy for other types of previously untreated CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma; and as a single agent for nonprogressing, low-grade, CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma after first-line chemotherapy treatment. It is also approved for both previously untreated and previously treated CD20-positive CLL in combination with chemotherapy. And it is approved for granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis in combination with glucocorticoids.
The approval is based on demonstration that rituximab-pvvr had no clinically meaningful differences in safety or efficacy when compared with the reference drug, rituximab (Rituxan), according to a release from the biosimilar’s developer. As with rituximab, rituximab-pvvr’s label comes with an FDA boxed warning. In the biosimilar’s case, it warns against fatal infusion-related reactions, severe mucocutaneous reactions, hepatitis B virus reactivation, and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Other adverse reactions include fever, headache, neutropenia, and lymphopenia.
The Food and Drug Administration has approved rituximab-pvvr (Ruxience) for adults with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. It is the first biosimilar approved to treat these two rare autoimmune conditions.
Specifically, the biosimilar product is approved as single-agent therapy for relapsed or refractory, low grade or follicular, CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma; in combination with chemotherapy for other types of previously untreated CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma; and as a single agent for nonprogressing, low-grade, CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma after first-line chemotherapy treatment. It is also approved for both previously untreated and previously treated CD20-positive CLL in combination with chemotherapy. And it is approved for granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis in combination with glucocorticoids.
The approval is based on demonstration that rituximab-pvvr had no clinically meaningful differences in safety or efficacy when compared with the reference drug, rituximab (Rituxan), according to a release from the biosimilar’s developer. As with rituximab, rituximab-pvvr’s label comes with an FDA boxed warning. In the biosimilar’s case, it warns against fatal infusion-related reactions, severe mucocutaneous reactions, hepatitis B virus reactivation, and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Other adverse reactions include fever, headache, neutropenia, and lymphopenia.
The Food and Drug Administration has approved rituximab-pvvr (Ruxience) for adults with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. It is the first biosimilar approved to treat these two rare autoimmune conditions.
Specifically, the biosimilar product is approved as single-agent therapy for relapsed or refractory, low grade or follicular, CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma; in combination with chemotherapy for other types of previously untreated CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma; and as a single agent for nonprogressing, low-grade, CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma after first-line chemotherapy treatment. It is also approved for both previously untreated and previously treated CD20-positive CLL in combination with chemotherapy. And it is approved for granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis in combination with glucocorticoids.
The approval is based on demonstration that rituximab-pvvr had no clinically meaningful differences in safety or efficacy when compared with the reference drug, rituximab (Rituxan), according to a release from the biosimilar’s developer. As with rituximab, rituximab-pvvr’s label comes with an FDA boxed warning. In the biosimilar’s case, it warns against fatal infusion-related reactions, severe mucocutaneous reactions, hepatitis B virus reactivation, and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Other adverse reactions include fever, headache, neutropenia, and lymphopenia.
CAR T-cell therapy less effective in transformed follicular lymphoma
All complete responders with FL were still in remission at a median follow-up of 24 months, but the median duration of response was 10.2 months for patients with tFL.
Alexandre V. Hirayama, MD, of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, and colleagues reported these results in Blood.
The trial enrolled 21 adults with relapsed/refractory CD19+ B-cell malignancies, including 8 patients with FL and 13 with tFL. At baseline, the FL/tFL patients had a median age of 56 years (range, 51-62), and 67% were male. Most patients (n = 19) had stage III/IV disease, 17 had extranodal disease, 8 had bulky disease, and 6 had bone marrow involvement. The patients had received a median of 5 prior therapies (range, 2-8), and 13 had received a transplant.
In this study, patients received a lymphodepleting regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed by 2 x 106 CD19 CAR T cells/kg. Five patients (one with FL and four with tFL) also received bridging chemotherapy between leukapheresis and lymphodepletion.
Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome occurred in 50% of FL patients and 39% of tFL patients (P = .35). Grade 1-2 neurotoxicity occurred in 50% and 23%, respectively (P = .67). There were no cases of grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity.
Most FL patients (7 of 8; 88%) achieved a complete response (CR) to treatment, and all of these patients were still in CR at a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 5-37 months). One FL patient received a transplant while in CR.
Six of 13 tFL patients (46%) achieved a CR. At a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 3-39 months), the median duration of response was 10.2 months. The median progression-free survival was 11.2 months in patients who achieved a CR and 1.4 months in all tFL patients.
The researchers noted that peak CAR T-cell counts and the duration of CAR T-cell detection were similar between FL and tFL patients. However, tFL patients had higher serum interleukin-8 concentrations and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels before treatment.
Past research suggested that IL-8 mediates the recruitment of tumor-associated neutrophils, promotes diffuse large B-cell lymphoma progression, and can contribute to local immune suppression. Other studies have linked elevated lactate dehydrogenase to aggressive disease and a more immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.
“Although these data raise the possibility that differences in the tumor microenvironment may, in part, contribute to differences in outcomes after CAR T-cell immunotherapy in FL and tFL patients, additional studies are required,” the researchers wrote.
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Life Science Discovery Fund, the Bezos family, the University of British Columbia Clinician Investigator Program, the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center’s Immunotherapy Integrated Research Center, and Juno Therapeutics/Celgene.
The researchers disclosed relationships with Celgene, Juno Therapeutics, Lyell Immunopharma, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Nohla, Kite Pharma, Gilead, Genentech, Novartis, Eureka Therapeutics, Nektar Therapeutics, Caribou Biosciences, Precision Biosciences, Aptevo, Humanigen, and Allogene.
SOURCE: Hirayama AV et al. Blood. 2019 Jun 26. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000905
All complete responders with FL were still in remission at a median follow-up of 24 months, but the median duration of response was 10.2 months for patients with tFL.
Alexandre V. Hirayama, MD, of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, and colleagues reported these results in Blood.
The trial enrolled 21 adults with relapsed/refractory CD19+ B-cell malignancies, including 8 patients with FL and 13 with tFL. At baseline, the FL/tFL patients had a median age of 56 years (range, 51-62), and 67% were male. Most patients (n = 19) had stage III/IV disease, 17 had extranodal disease, 8 had bulky disease, and 6 had bone marrow involvement. The patients had received a median of 5 prior therapies (range, 2-8), and 13 had received a transplant.
In this study, patients received a lymphodepleting regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed by 2 x 106 CD19 CAR T cells/kg. Five patients (one with FL and four with tFL) also received bridging chemotherapy between leukapheresis and lymphodepletion.
Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome occurred in 50% of FL patients and 39% of tFL patients (P = .35). Grade 1-2 neurotoxicity occurred in 50% and 23%, respectively (P = .67). There were no cases of grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity.
Most FL patients (7 of 8; 88%) achieved a complete response (CR) to treatment, and all of these patients were still in CR at a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 5-37 months). One FL patient received a transplant while in CR.
Six of 13 tFL patients (46%) achieved a CR. At a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 3-39 months), the median duration of response was 10.2 months. The median progression-free survival was 11.2 months in patients who achieved a CR and 1.4 months in all tFL patients.
The researchers noted that peak CAR T-cell counts and the duration of CAR T-cell detection were similar between FL and tFL patients. However, tFL patients had higher serum interleukin-8 concentrations and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels before treatment.
Past research suggested that IL-8 mediates the recruitment of tumor-associated neutrophils, promotes diffuse large B-cell lymphoma progression, and can contribute to local immune suppression. Other studies have linked elevated lactate dehydrogenase to aggressive disease and a more immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.
“Although these data raise the possibility that differences in the tumor microenvironment may, in part, contribute to differences in outcomes after CAR T-cell immunotherapy in FL and tFL patients, additional studies are required,” the researchers wrote.
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Life Science Discovery Fund, the Bezos family, the University of British Columbia Clinician Investigator Program, the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center’s Immunotherapy Integrated Research Center, and Juno Therapeutics/Celgene.
The researchers disclosed relationships with Celgene, Juno Therapeutics, Lyell Immunopharma, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Nohla, Kite Pharma, Gilead, Genentech, Novartis, Eureka Therapeutics, Nektar Therapeutics, Caribou Biosciences, Precision Biosciences, Aptevo, Humanigen, and Allogene.
SOURCE: Hirayama AV et al. Blood. 2019 Jun 26. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000905
All complete responders with FL were still in remission at a median follow-up of 24 months, but the median duration of response was 10.2 months for patients with tFL.
Alexandre V. Hirayama, MD, of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, and colleagues reported these results in Blood.
The trial enrolled 21 adults with relapsed/refractory CD19+ B-cell malignancies, including 8 patients with FL and 13 with tFL. At baseline, the FL/tFL patients had a median age of 56 years (range, 51-62), and 67% were male. Most patients (n = 19) had stage III/IV disease, 17 had extranodal disease, 8 had bulky disease, and 6 had bone marrow involvement. The patients had received a median of 5 prior therapies (range, 2-8), and 13 had received a transplant.
In this study, patients received a lymphodepleting regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed by 2 x 106 CD19 CAR T cells/kg. Five patients (one with FL and four with tFL) also received bridging chemotherapy between leukapheresis and lymphodepletion.
Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome occurred in 50% of FL patients and 39% of tFL patients (P = .35). Grade 1-2 neurotoxicity occurred in 50% and 23%, respectively (P = .67). There were no cases of grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity.
Most FL patients (7 of 8; 88%) achieved a complete response (CR) to treatment, and all of these patients were still in CR at a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 5-37 months). One FL patient received a transplant while in CR.
Six of 13 tFL patients (46%) achieved a CR. At a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 3-39 months), the median duration of response was 10.2 months. The median progression-free survival was 11.2 months in patients who achieved a CR and 1.4 months in all tFL patients.
The researchers noted that peak CAR T-cell counts and the duration of CAR T-cell detection were similar between FL and tFL patients. However, tFL patients had higher serum interleukin-8 concentrations and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels before treatment.
Past research suggested that IL-8 mediates the recruitment of tumor-associated neutrophils, promotes diffuse large B-cell lymphoma progression, and can contribute to local immune suppression. Other studies have linked elevated lactate dehydrogenase to aggressive disease and a more immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.
“Although these data raise the possibility that differences in the tumor microenvironment may, in part, contribute to differences in outcomes after CAR T-cell immunotherapy in FL and tFL patients, additional studies are required,” the researchers wrote.
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Life Science Discovery Fund, the Bezos family, the University of British Columbia Clinician Investigator Program, the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center’s Immunotherapy Integrated Research Center, and Juno Therapeutics/Celgene.
The researchers disclosed relationships with Celgene, Juno Therapeutics, Lyell Immunopharma, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Nohla, Kite Pharma, Gilead, Genentech, Novartis, Eureka Therapeutics, Nektar Therapeutics, Caribou Biosciences, Precision Biosciences, Aptevo, Humanigen, and Allogene.
SOURCE: Hirayama AV et al. Blood. 2019 Jun 26. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000905
FROM BLOOD
5F9 plus rituximab take a bite out of drug-resistant NHL
AMSTERDAM – The novel monoclonal antibody , thereby thwarting a mechanism that non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) use to evade immune surveillance, investigators report.
Among 97 patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive or indolent lymphomas in a phase 1b/2 trial who were treated with Hu5F9 (5F9) plus rituximab, the objective response rate (ORR) was 45%, reported Mark Roschewski, MD, of the National Cancer Institute’s Center for Cancer Research in Bethesda, Md.
5F9 is an immune checkpoint inhibitor that targets CD47, the “don’t eat me” signal that inhibits macrophages from carrying out their crucial phagocytosis role.
“Rituximab, through its activity on the Fc receptor, places an extrinsic ‘eat me’ signal, so when you give these two things together you’re blocking the ‘don’t eat me’ signal and you’re placing the ‘eat me’ signal, and then the cell becomes susceptible to phagocytosis,” he said in a briefing prior to his presentation of the data at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association.
5F9 is the first agent in its class and the most advanced in clinical trials, but several similar agents are also in development. As previously reported, a similar molecule labeled TTI-621 has shown early activity in the treatment of T-cell lymphomas.
In an interview, Dr. Roschewski explained that the therapeutic approach shows promise for the treatment of NHL and nonmalignant diseases.
“This target isn’t even specific to cancer. There is rationale for using this to treat infections or other conditions. Basically, anything that your innate immune system should normally chew up, if that cell has always been evading it using that signal, this removes that [evasion] mechanism,” he said.
In preclinical studies, 5F9 showed the most activity against NHL and acute myeloid leukemia, he noted.
Results of the phase 1b portion of the study were reported in the New England Journal of Medicine (2018;379:1711-21). At the EHA Congress, Dr. Roschewski reported on extended follow-up of the phase 1b cohort and preliminary phase 2 data.
In phase 2, the investigators enrolled patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) that was either primary refractory to standard therapy or relapsed/refractory after two or more prior lines of therapy and who were not eligible for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. They also enrolled a smaller cohort of patients with the indolent lymphoma histologies follicular lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) whose disease was relapsed or refractory to at least two prior lines.
Dr. Roschewski reported on pooled data for 115 patients enrolled in phases 1b and 2: 70 with DLBCL, 41 with FL, and 4 with MZL.
The patients were heavily pretreated with a median of three prior lines of therapy. Of the patients with DLBCL, 59% had primary refractory disease, and 89% of the patients with DLBCL in phase 2 were not eligible for CAR T-cell therapy.
Among all patients in this analysis, 85% had disease that was refractory to a prior rituximab-containing regimen, and the majority had disease that was refractory to the last rituximab-containing regimen.
Among 97 patients evaluable for response (59 with DLBCL, 35 with FL, and 3 with MZL), the ORR was 45%, including 19% CR and 27% partial responses (PR). An additional 17% of patients had stable disease, and 38% experienced disease progression.
The ORR for DLBCL patients was 35%, consisting of 15% CR and 20% PR. An additional 12% of patients with DLBCL had stable disease, and 53% experienced progression.
Of the patients with indolent lymphomas, the ORR was 61%, including 24% CR and 37% PR. Of this group, 24% had stable disease, and 16% had disease progression.
For all patients, the median time to response was 1.8 months (range 1.6-7.3 months).
Efficacy among patients with DLBCL was similar across subtypes and for patients with primary refractory vs. acquired refractory disease. The responses also were similar irrespective of prior lines of therapy.
Patients tolerated the combination well, with no maximum tolerated dose at up to 45 mg/kg of 5F9, and no significant dose-related toxicities.
Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2. The most common adverse events included expected on-target anemia, caused by clearance of aging red blood cells, which are cleared by the CD47-blocking effects of 5F9. This anemia can be mitigated with an initial priming dose of 1 mg/kg 5FP that causes a transient mild decline in hemoglobin and a temporary reticulocytosis that soon resolves. Hemoglobin levels return to baseline even with continued 5F9 at doses much higher than the priming dose, Dr. Roschewski said.
Other adverse events were infusion reactions and related symptoms. There were no autoimmune adverse events, and just 8 of the 115 patients available for the safety analysis (7%) had to discontinue therapy.
Enrollment in the phase 2 trial is continuing, and a 30-mg/kg maintenance dose of 5F9 has been selected for a trial in patients with DLBCL who are either ineligible for CAR T-cell therapy or have disease that progressed on three or more prior lines of therapy.
The study is funded by Forty Seven and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. Dr. Roschewski reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Roschewski M et al. EHA Congress, Abstract S867.
AMSTERDAM – The novel monoclonal antibody , thereby thwarting a mechanism that non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) use to evade immune surveillance, investigators report.
Among 97 patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive or indolent lymphomas in a phase 1b/2 trial who were treated with Hu5F9 (5F9) plus rituximab, the objective response rate (ORR) was 45%, reported Mark Roschewski, MD, of the National Cancer Institute’s Center for Cancer Research in Bethesda, Md.
5F9 is an immune checkpoint inhibitor that targets CD47, the “don’t eat me” signal that inhibits macrophages from carrying out their crucial phagocytosis role.
“Rituximab, through its activity on the Fc receptor, places an extrinsic ‘eat me’ signal, so when you give these two things together you’re blocking the ‘don’t eat me’ signal and you’re placing the ‘eat me’ signal, and then the cell becomes susceptible to phagocytosis,” he said in a briefing prior to his presentation of the data at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association.
5F9 is the first agent in its class and the most advanced in clinical trials, but several similar agents are also in development. As previously reported, a similar molecule labeled TTI-621 has shown early activity in the treatment of T-cell lymphomas.
In an interview, Dr. Roschewski explained that the therapeutic approach shows promise for the treatment of NHL and nonmalignant diseases.
“This target isn’t even specific to cancer. There is rationale for using this to treat infections or other conditions. Basically, anything that your innate immune system should normally chew up, if that cell has always been evading it using that signal, this removes that [evasion] mechanism,” he said.
In preclinical studies, 5F9 showed the most activity against NHL and acute myeloid leukemia, he noted.
Results of the phase 1b portion of the study were reported in the New England Journal of Medicine (2018;379:1711-21). At the EHA Congress, Dr. Roschewski reported on extended follow-up of the phase 1b cohort and preliminary phase 2 data.
In phase 2, the investigators enrolled patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) that was either primary refractory to standard therapy or relapsed/refractory after two or more prior lines of therapy and who were not eligible for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. They also enrolled a smaller cohort of patients with the indolent lymphoma histologies follicular lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) whose disease was relapsed or refractory to at least two prior lines.
Dr. Roschewski reported on pooled data for 115 patients enrolled in phases 1b and 2: 70 with DLBCL, 41 with FL, and 4 with MZL.
The patients were heavily pretreated with a median of three prior lines of therapy. Of the patients with DLBCL, 59% had primary refractory disease, and 89% of the patients with DLBCL in phase 2 were not eligible for CAR T-cell therapy.
Among all patients in this analysis, 85% had disease that was refractory to a prior rituximab-containing regimen, and the majority had disease that was refractory to the last rituximab-containing regimen.
Among 97 patients evaluable for response (59 with DLBCL, 35 with FL, and 3 with MZL), the ORR was 45%, including 19% CR and 27% partial responses (PR). An additional 17% of patients had stable disease, and 38% experienced disease progression.
The ORR for DLBCL patients was 35%, consisting of 15% CR and 20% PR. An additional 12% of patients with DLBCL had stable disease, and 53% experienced progression.
Of the patients with indolent lymphomas, the ORR was 61%, including 24% CR and 37% PR. Of this group, 24% had stable disease, and 16% had disease progression.
For all patients, the median time to response was 1.8 months (range 1.6-7.3 months).
Efficacy among patients with DLBCL was similar across subtypes and for patients with primary refractory vs. acquired refractory disease. The responses also were similar irrespective of prior lines of therapy.
Patients tolerated the combination well, with no maximum tolerated dose at up to 45 mg/kg of 5F9, and no significant dose-related toxicities.
Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2. The most common adverse events included expected on-target anemia, caused by clearance of aging red blood cells, which are cleared by the CD47-blocking effects of 5F9. This anemia can be mitigated with an initial priming dose of 1 mg/kg 5FP that causes a transient mild decline in hemoglobin and a temporary reticulocytosis that soon resolves. Hemoglobin levels return to baseline even with continued 5F9 at doses much higher than the priming dose, Dr. Roschewski said.
Other adverse events were infusion reactions and related symptoms. There were no autoimmune adverse events, and just 8 of the 115 patients available for the safety analysis (7%) had to discontinue therapy.
Enrollment in the phase 2 trial is continuing, and a 30-mg/kg maintenance dose of 5F9 has been selected for a trial in patients with DLBCL who are either ineligible for CAR T-cell therapy or have disease that progressed on three or more prior lines of therapy.
The study is funded by Forty Seven and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. Dr. Roschewski reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Roschewski M et al. EHA Congress, Abstract S867.
AMSTERDAM – The novel monoclonal antibody , thereby thwarting a mechanism that non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) use to evade immune surveillance, investigators report.
Among 97 patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive or indolent lymphomas in a phase 1b/2 trial who were treated with Hu5F9 (5F9) plus rituximab, the objective response rate (ORR) was 45%, reported Mark Roschewski, MD, of the National Cancer Institute’s Center for Cancer Research in Bethesda, Md.
5F9 is an immune checkpoint inhibitor that targets CD47, the “don’t eat me” signal that inhibits macrophages from carrying out their crucial phagocytosis role.
“Rituximab, through its activity on the Fc receptor, places an extrinsic ‘eat me’ signal, so when you give these two things together you’re blocking the ‘don’t eat me’ signal and you’re placing the ‘eat me’ signal, and then the cell becomes susceptible to phagocytosis,” he said in a briefing prior to his presentation of the data at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association.
5F9 is the first agent in its class and the most advanced in clinical trials, but several similar agents are also in development. As previously reported, a similar molecule labeled TTI-621 has shown early activity in the treatment of T-cell lymphomas.
In an interview, Dr. Roschewski explained that the therapeutic approach shows promise for the treatment of NHL and nonmalignant diseases.
“This target isn’t even specific to cancer. There is rationale for using this to treat infections or other conditions. Basically, anything that your innate immune system should normally chew up, if that cell has always been evading it using that signal, this removes that [evasion] mechanism,” he said.
In preclinical studies, 5F9 showed the most activity against NHL and acute myeloid leukemia, he noted.
Results of the phase 1b portion of the study were reported in the New England Journal of Medicine (2018;379:1711-21). At the EHA Congress, Dr. Roschewski reported on extended follow-up of the phase 1b cohort and preliminary phase 2 data.
In phase 2, the investigators enrolled patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) that was either primary refractory to standard therapy or relapsed/refractory after two or more prior lines of therapy and who were not eligible for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. They also enrolled a smaller cohort of patients with the indolent lymphoma histologies follicular lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) whose disease was relapsed or refractory to at least two prior lines.
Dr. Roschewski reported on pooled data for 115 patients enrolled in phases 1b and 2: 70 with DLBCL, 41 with FL, and 4 with MZL.
The patients were heavily pretreated with a median of three prior lines of therapy. Of the patients with DLBCL, 59% had primary refractory disease, and 89% of the patients with DLBCL in phase 2 were not eligible for CAR T-cell therapy.
Among all patients in this analysis, 85% had disease that was refractory to a prior rituximab-containing regimen, and the majority had disease that was refractory to the last rituximab-containing regimen.
Among 97 patients evaluable for response (59 with DLBCL, 35 with FL, and 3 with MZL), the ORR was 45%, including 19% CR and 27% partial responses (PR). An additional 17% of patients had stable disease, and 38% experienced disease progression.
The ORR for DLBCL patients was 35%, consisting of 15% CR and 20% PR. An additional 12% of patients with DLBCL had stable disease, and 53% experienced progression.
Of the patients with indolent lymphomas, the ORR was 61%, including 24% CR and 37% PR. Of this group, 24% had stable disease, and 16% had disease progression.
For all patients, the median time to response was 1.8 months (range 1.6-7.3 months).
Efficacy among patients with DLBCL was similar across subtypes and for patients with primary refractory vs. acquired refractory disease. The responses also were similar irrespective of prior lines of therapy.
Patients tolerated the combination well, with no maximum tolerated dose at up to 45 mg/kg of 5F9, and no significant dose-related toxicities.
Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2. The most common adverse events included expected on-target anemia, caused by clearance of aging red blood cells, which are cleared by the CD47-blocking effects of 5F9. This anemia can be mitigated with an initial priming dose of 1 mg/kg 5FP that causes a transient mild decline in hemoglobin and a temporary reticulocytosis that soon resolves. Hemoglobin levels return to baseline even with continued 5F9 at doses much higher than the priming dose, Dr. Roschewski said.
Other adverse events were infusion reactions and related symptoms. There were no autoimmune adverse events, and just 8 of the 115 patients available for the safety analysis (7%) had to discontinue therapy.
Enrollment in the phase 2 trial is continuing, and a 30-mg/kg maintenance dose of 5F9 has been selected for a trial in patients with DLBCL who are either ineligible for CAR T-cell therapy or have disease that progressed on three or more prior lines of therapy.
The study is funded by Forty Seven and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. Dr. Roschewski reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Roschewski M et al. EHA Congress, Abstract S867.
REPORTING FROM EHA CONGRESS
Key clinical point: The combination of Hu5F9 and rituximab shows activity in heavily pretreated, relapsed/refractory lymphomas.
Major finding: Among all evaluable patients, the objective response rate was 45%. The objective response rate for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was 35%.
Study details: A pooled analysis of data from phase 1b/2 studies in patients with aggressive and indolent lymphomas. Among 97 patients evaluable for response, there were 59 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 35 with follicular lymphoma, and 3 with marginal zone lymphoma.
Disclosures: The study is funded by Forty Seven and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. Dr. Roschewski reported having no financial disclosures.
Source: Roschewski M et al. EHA Congress, Abstract S867.
R2 appears active in high-risk FL and MZL
CHICAGO – Lenalidomide plus rituximab (R2) demonstrated activity against relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) in the phase 3b MAGNIFY trial.
R2 produced responses in FL and MZL patients, including those who had previously experienced early relapse and patients who were refractory to rituximab or both lenalidomide and rituximab at baseline.
David Jacob Andorsky, MD, of Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers in Boulder, Colo., and colleagues presented these results in a poster at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The ongoing MAGNIFY trial has enrolled 370 patients with relapsed/refractory FL (grade 1-3a) or MZL.
For induction, patients receive lenalidomide (20 mg per day on days 1-21 for 12 cycles) and rituximab (375 mg/m2 per week in cycle 1 and then on day 1 of cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11). Patients who achieve stable disease or better on R2 induction are randomized to maintenance with R2 or rituximab alone.
Dr. Andorsky and colleagues presented results of R2 induction in 310 evaluable patients – 247 with FL and 63 with MZL.
The patients had a median age of 66 years (range, 35-91 years) at baseline, and they had received a median of two prior therapies (range, one to eight). Some patients had experienced early relapse (37%, n = 115), were refractory to rituximab (36%, n = 113), or were refractory to both rituximab and lenalidomide (20%, n = 63) at baseline.
Results
At a median follow-up of 16.7 months, the overall response rate was 73%, and the complete response rate was 45%. The overall response rate was 74% in FL patients, 65% in MZL patients, 63% in rituximab-refractory patients, 51% in double-refractory patients, and 68% in patients with an early relapse.
The median duration of response was 36.8 months in all patients, 35.8 months in MZL patients, and not reached in FL patients. The median duration of response was 35.8 months in patients who were rituximab refractory and was not reached in patients who were not refractory to rituximab.
The median progression-free survival was 36 months overall, 30 months in FL patients, 38 months in MZL patients, 23 months in patients with early relapse, and 15.5 months in double-refractory patients.
“While these [subgroup analyses of efficacy] were exploratory endpoints, I think this suggests that [R2] is a promising regimen for patients that are in the high-risk subgroup,” said Carla Casulo, MD, of the University of Rochester (N.Y.), who reviewed this study in a poster discussion session.
The most common adverse events in this trial were fatigue (48%), neutropenia (40%), diarrhea (35%), nausea (30%), and constipation (29%). The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia (34%).
The MAGNIFY trial is sponsored by Celgene. Dr. Andorsky reported financial relationships with Celgene, CTI BioPharma, and Gilead Sciences. Dr. Casulo reported financial relationships with Gilead Sciences, Celgene, and Roche.
SOURCE: Andorsky DJ et al. ASCO 2019, Abstract 7513.
CHICAGO – Lenalidomide plus rituximab (R2) demonstrated activity against relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) in the phase 3b MAGNIFY trial.
R2 produced responses in FL and MZL patients, including those who had previously experienced early relapse and patients who were refractory to rituximab or both lenalidomide and rituximab at baseline.
David Jacob Andorsky, MD, of Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers in Boulder, Colo., and colleagues presented these results in a poster at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The ongoing MAGNIFY trial has enrolled 370 patients with relapsed/refractory FL (grade 1-3a) or MZL.
For induction, patients receive lenalidomide (20 mg per day on days 1-21 for 12 cycles) and rituximab (375 mg/m2 per week in cycle 1 and then on day 1 of cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11). Patients who achieve stable disease or better on R2 induction are randomized to maintenance with R2 or rituximab alone.
Dr. Andorsky and colleagues presented results of R2 induction in 310 evaluable patients – 247 with FL and 63 with MZL.
The patients had a median age of 66 years (range, 35-91 years) at baseline, and they had received a median of two prior therapies (range, one to eight). Some patients had experienced early relapse (37%, n = 115), were refractory to rituximab (36%, n = 113), or were refractory to both rituximab and lenalidomide (20%, n = 63) at baseline.
Results
At a median follow-up of 16.7 months, the overall response rate was 73%, and the complete response rate was 45%. The overall response rate was 74% in FL patients, 65% in MZL patients, 63% in rituximab-refractory patients, 51% in double-refractory patients, and 68% in patients with an early relapse.
The median duration of response was 36.8 months in all patients, 35.8 months in MZL patients, and not reached in FL patients. The median duration of response was 35.8 months in patients who were rituximab refractory and was not reached in patients who were not refractory to rituximab.
The median progression-free survival was 36 months overall, 30 months in FL patients, 38 months in MZL patients, 23 months in patients with early relapse, and 15.5 months in double-refractory patients.
“While these [subgroup analyses of efficacy] were exploratory endpoints, I think this suggests that [R2] is a promising regimen for patients that are in the high-risk subgroup,” said Carla Casulo, MD, of the University of Rochester (N.Y.), who reviewed this study in a poster discussion session.
The most common adverse events in this trial were fatigue (48%), neutropenia (40%), diarrhea (35%), nausea (30%), and constipation (29%). The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia (34%).
The MAGNIFY trial is sponsored by Celgene. Dr. Andorsky reported financial relationships with Celgene, CTI BioPharma, and Gilead Sciences. Dr. Casulo reported financial relationships with Gilead Sciences, Celgene, and Roche.
SOURCE: Andorsky DJ et al. ASCO 2019, Abstract 7513.
CHICAGO – Lenalidomide plus rituximab (R2) demonstrated activity against relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) in the phase 3b MAGNIFY trial.
R2 produced responses in FL and MZL patients, including those who had previously experienced early relapse and patients who were refractory to rituximab or both lenalidomide and rituximab at baseline.
David Jacob Andorsky, MD, of Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers in Boulder, Colo., and colleagues presented these results in a poster at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The ongoing MAGNIFY trial has enrolled 370 patients with relapsed/refractory FL (grade 1-3a) or MZL.
For induction, patients receive lenalidomide (20 mg per day on days 1-21 for 12 cycles) and rituximab (375 mg/m2 per week in cycle 1 and then on day 1 of cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11). Patients who achieve stable disease or better on R2 induction are randomized to maintenance with R2 or rituximab alone.
Dr. Andorsky and colleagues presented results of R2 induction in 310 evaluable patients – 247 with FL and 63 with MZL.
The patients had a median age of 66 years (range, 35-91 years) at baseline, and they had received a median of two prior therapies (range, one to eight). Some patients had experienced early relapse (37%, n = 115), were refractory to rituximab (36%, n = 113), or were refractory to both rituximab and lenalidomide (20%, n = 63) at baseline.
Results
At a median follow-up of 16.7 months, the overall response rate was 73%, and the complete response rate was 45%. The overall response rate was 74% in FL patients, 65% in MZL patients, 63% in rituximab-refractory patients, 51% in double-refractory patients, and 68% in patients with an early relapse.
The median duration of response was 36.8 months in all patients, 35.8 months in MZL patients, and not reached in FL patients. The median duration of response was 35.8 months in patients who were rituximab refractory and was not reached in patients who were not refractory to rituximab.
The median progression-free survival was 36 months overall, 30 months in FL patients, 38 months in MZL patients, 23 months in patients with early relapse, and 15.5 months in double-refractory patients.
“While these [subgroup analyses of efficacy] were exploratory endpoints, I think this suggests that [R2] is a promising regimen for patients that are in the high-risk subgroup,” said Carla Casulo, MD, of the University of Rochester (N.Y.), who reviewed this study in a poster discussion session.
The most common adverse events in this trial were fatigue (48%), neutropenia (40%), diarrhea (35%), nausea (30%), and constipation (29%). The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia (34%).
The MAGNIFY trial is sponsored by Celgene. Dr. Andorsky reported financial relationships with Celgene, CTI BioPharma, and Gilead Sciences. Dr. Casulo reported financial relationships with Gilead Sciences, Celgene, and Roche.
SOURCE: Andorsky DJ et al. ASCO 2019, Abstract 7513.
REPORTING FROM ASCO 2019
Inhibitor produces high response rate in relapsed/refractory FL
CHICAGO – The phosphoinositide 3-kinase–delta inhibitor ME-401, given with or without rituximab, produced an overall response rate of 80% in a phase 1b trial of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.
Response rates were similar between patients who received ME-401 alone and those who received it in combination with rituximab.
Response rates were also similar between patients on an intermittent dosing schedule and those on a continuous dosing schedule. However, intermittent dosing decreased the rate of delayed grade 3 adverse events (AEs).
“The idea that continuous inhibition of target is absolutely essential for activity of this class of drugs has not been proven,” said Andrew Zelenetz, MD, PhD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.
“The promising results of this somewhat novel intermittent schedule that we used with ME-401 suggests to me that we can maintain efficacy and reduce toxicity.”
Dr. Zelenetz and colleagues presented these results in a poster at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Patients and dosing
Data were presented for 54 patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma enrolled on this study. The patients had a median age of 63.5 years, and 80% were male. They had received a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1-10).
Initially, patients received ME-401 at 60 mg, 120 mg, or 180 mg once daily continuously on a 28-day cycle. However, the dose-escalation portion of the study was closed because response rates were comparable among the three doses, the safety profile was similar, and there were no dose-limiting toxicities.
Two additional groups of patients received ME-401 at 60 mg daily for two cycles, followed by an intermittent schedule (IS) of 60 mg on days 1-7, repeated every 28 days.
The researchers had observed delayed grade 3 AEs on the continuous schedule (CS), and they hypothesized that the IS might prevent these events. Patients could revert to the CS if they had stable disease or progressed on the IS.
“One of the advantages of this particular agent is the very long half-life,” Dr. Zelenetz said. “So, essentially, we have 2 weeks on drug and 2 weeks off [with the IS]. It takes about a week to clear the drug because it has about a 30-hour half-life.”
In all, 40 patients received ME-401 monotherapy, and 14 received ME-401 plus rituximab at 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks and then on day 1 of cycles 3-6. There were 31 patients who received ME-401 on the CS and 23 who received ME-401 on the IS.
Results
A total of 50 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The overall response rate in these patients was 80% (40/50), and 20% (10/50) achieved a complete response.
The overall response rate was 79% (30/38) in patients who received ME-401 alone, 83% (10/12) in those who received ME-401 plus rituximab, 83% (25/30) in patients on the CS, and 75% (15/20) in those on the IS.
The median duration of response and median progression-free survival have not been reached. The median follow-up for response duration is 8.8 months in the IS group and 8.3 months in the CS group. The median follow-up for progression-free survival is 5.5 months and 6.5 months, respectively.
A total of 18 patients on the IS (78%) were still on therapy at the data cutoff, as were 14 patients (45%) on the CS.
Seven patients (23%) on the CS and two patients (9%) on the IS discontinued treatment due to progression. Four patients in the IS group and two in the CS group who were switched to IS dosing reverted to CS dosing after experiencing progression.
Four CS patients (13%) discontinued treatment because of AEs, but none of the IS patients did.
AEs occurring in at least 15% of patients were diarrhea/colitis (40.7%), fatigue (35.2%), cough (33.3%), rash (24.1%), ALT increase (24.1%), nausea (24.1%), AST increase (22.2%), and decreased appetite (16.7%).
There were no grade 4-5 AEs. Grade 3 drug-related AEs of special interest (in the CS and IS groups, respectively) were diarrhea/colitis (16.1% and 8.7%), rash (12.9% and 0%), ALT increase (6.5% and 4.3%), AST increase (6.5% and 0%), pneumonia (6.5% and 0%), and mucositis (1.9% and 0%).
“[W]hile the grade 3 immune-related events seem to be very consistent in terms of class effects, they did seem to improve with transition to intermittent schedule,” said Carla Casulo, MD, of the University of Rochester (N.Y.), who reviewed this study in a poster discussion session.
“And I think that this novel design helps to create an opportunity to limit treatment and mitigate toxicity without necessarily compromising efficacy.”
The phase 1b trial is sponsored by MEI Pharma. Dr. Zelenetz reported relationships with MEI Pharma and several other companies. Dr. Casulo reported relationships with Gilead Sciences, Celgene, and Roche.
SOURCE: Zelenetz A et al. ASCO 2019, Abstract 7512.
CHICAGO – The phosphoinositide 3-kinase–delta inhibitor ME-401, given with or without rituximab, produced an overall response rate of 80% in a phase 1b trial of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.
Response rates were similar between patients who received ME-401 alone and those who received it in combination with rituximab.
Response rates were also similar between patients on an intermittent dosing schedule and those on a continuous dosing schedule. However, intermittent dosing decreased the rate of delayed grade 3 adverse events (AEs).
“The idea that continuous inhibition of target is absolutely essential for activity of this class of drugs has not been proven,” said Andrew Zelenetz, MD, PhD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.
“The promising results of this somewhat novel intermittent schedule that we used with ME-401 suggests to me that we can maintain efficacy and reduce toxicity.”
Dr. Zelenetz and colleagues presented these results in a poster at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Patients and dosing
Data were presented for 54 patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma enrolled on this study. The patients had a median age of 63.5 years, and 80% were male. They had received a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1-10).
Initially, patients received ME-401 at 60 mg, 120 mg, or 180 mg once daily continuously on a 28-day cycle. However, the dose-escalation portion of the study was closed because response rates were comparable among the three doses, the safety profile was similar, and there were no dose-limiting toxicities.
Two additional groups of patients received ME-401 at 60 mg daily for two cycles, followed by an intermittent schedule (IS) of 60 mg on days 1-7, repeated every 28 days.
The researchers had observed delayed grade 3 AEs on the continuous schedule (CS), and they hypothesized that the IS might prevent these events. Patients could revert to the CS if they had stable disease or progressed on the IS.
“One of the advantages of this particular agent is the very long half-life,” Dr. Zelenetz said. “So, essentially, we have 2 weeks on drug and 2 weeks off [with the IS]. It takes about a week to clear the drug because it has about a 30-hour half-life.”
In all, 40 patients received ME-401 monotherapy, and 14 received ME-401 plus rituximab at 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks and then on day 1 of cycles 3-6. There were 31 patients who received ME-401 on the CS and 23 who received ME-401 on the IS.
Results
A total of 50 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The overall response rate in these patients was 80% (40/50), and 20% (10/50) achieved a complete response.
The overall response rate was 79% (30/38) in patients who received ME-401 alone, 83% (10/12) in those who received ME-401 plus rituximab, 83% (25/30) in patients on the CS, and 75% (15/20) in those on the IS.
The median duration of response and median progression-free survival have not been reached. The median follow-up for response duration is 8.8 months in the IS group and 8.3 months in the CS group. The median follow-up for progression-free survival is 5.5 months and 6.5 months, respectively.
A total of 18 patients on the IS (78%) were still on therapy at the data cutoff, as were 14 patients (45%) on the CS.
Seven patients (23%) on the CS and two patients (9%) on the IS discontinued treatment due to progression. Four patients in the IS group and two in the CS group who were switched to IS dosing reverted to CS dosing after experiencing progression.
Four CS patients (13%) discontinued treatment because of AEs, but none of the IS patients did.
AEs occurring in at least 15% of patients were diarrhea/colitis (40.7%), fatigue (35.2%), cough (33.3%), rash (24.1%), ALT increase (24.1%), nausea (24.1%), AST increase (22.2%), and decreased appetite (16.7%).
There were no grade 4-5 AEs. Grade 3 drug-related AEs of special interest (in the CS and IS groups, respectively) were diarrhea/colitis (16.1% and 8.7%), rash (12.9% and 0%), ALT increase (6.5% and 4.3%), AST increase (6.5% and 0%), pneumonia (6.5% and 0%), and mucositis (1.9% and 0%).
“[W]hile the grade 3 immune-related events seem to be very consistent in terms of class effects, they did seem to improve with transition to intermittent schedule,” said Carla Casulo, MD, of the University of Rochester (N.Y.), who reviewed this study in a poster discussion session.
“And I think that this novel design helps to create an opportunity to limit treatment and mitigate toxicity without necessarily compromising efficacy.”
The phase 1b trial is sponsored by MEI Pharma. Dr. Zelenetz reported relationships with MEI Pharma and several other companies. Dr. Casulo reported relationships with Gilead Sciences, Celgene, and Roche.
SOURCE: Zelenetz A et al. ASCO 2019, Abstract 7512.
CHICAGO – The phosphoinositide 3-kinase–delta inhibitor ME-401, given with or without rituximab, produced an overall response rate of 80% in a phase 1b trial of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.
Response rates were similar between patients who received ME-401 alone and those who received it in combination with rituximab.
Response rates were also similar between patients on an intermittent dosing schedule and those on a continuous dosing schedule. However, intermittent dosing decreased the rate of delayed grade 3 adverse events (AEs).
“The idea that continuous inhibition of target is absolutely essential for activity of this class of drugs has not been proven,” said Andrew Zelenetz, MD, PhD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.
“The promising results of this somewhat novel intermittent schedule that we used with ME-401 suggests to me that we can maintain efficacy and reduce toxicity.”
Dr. Zelenetz and colleagues presented these results in a poster at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Patients and dosing
Data were presented for 54 patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma enrolled on this study. The patients had a median age of 63.5 years, and 80% were male. They had received a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1-10).
Initially, patients received ME-401 at 60 mg, 120 mg, or 180 mg once daily continuously on a 28-day cycle. However, the dose-escalation portion of the study was closed because response rates were comparable among the three doses, the safety profile was similar, and there were no dose-limiting toxicities.
Two additional groups of patients received ME-401 at 60 mg daily for two cycles, followed by an intermittent schedule (IS) of 60 mg on days 1-7, repeated every 28 days.
The researchers had observed delayed grade 3 AEs on the continuous schedule (CS), and they hypothesized that the IS might prevent these events. Patients could revert to the CS if they had stable disease or progressed on the IS.
“One of the advantages of this particular agent is the very long half-life,” Dr. Zelenetz said. “So, essentially, we have 2 weeks on drug and 2 weeks off [with the IS]. It takes about a week to clear the drug because it has about a 30-hour half-life.”
In all, 40 patients received ME-401 monotherapy, and 14 received ME-401 plus rituximab at 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks and then on day 1 of cycles 3-6. There were 31 patients who received ME-401 on the CS and 23 who received ME-401 on the IS.
Results
A total of 50 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The overall response rate in these patients was 80% (40/50), and 20% (10/50) achieved a complete response.
The overall response rate was 79% (30/38) in patients who received ME-401 alone, 83% (10/12) in those who received ME-401 plus rituximab, 83% (25/30) in patients on the CS, and 75% (15/20) in those on the IS.
The median duration of response and median progression-free survival have not been reached. The median follow-up for response duration is 8.8 months in the IS group and 8.3 months in the CS group. The median follow-up for progression-free survival is 5.5 months and 6.5 months, respectively.
A total of 18 patients on the IS (78%) were still on therapy at the data cutoff, as were 14 patients (45%) on the CS.
Seven patients (23%) on the CS and two patients (9%) on the IS discontinued treatment due to progression. Four patients in the IS group and two in the CS group who were switched to IS dosing reverted to CS dosing after experiencing progression.
Four CS patients (13%) discontinued treatment because of AEs, but none of the IS patients did.
AEs occurring in at least 15% of patients were diarrhea/colitis (40.7%), fatigue (35.2%), cough (33.3%), rash (24.1%), ALT increase (24.1%), nausea (24.1%), AST increase (22.2%), and decreased appetite (16.7%).
There were no grade 4-5 AEs. Grade 3 drug-related AEs of special interest (in the CS and IS groups, respectively) were diarrhea/colitis (16.1% and 8.7%), rash (12.9% and 0%), ALT increase (6.5% and 4.3%), AST increase (6.5% and 0%), pneumonia (6.5% and 0%), and mucositis (1.9% and 0%).
“[W]hile the grade 3 immune-related events seem to be very consistent in terms of class effects, they did seem to improve with transition to intermittent schedule,” said Carla Casulo, MD, of the University of Rochester (N.Y.), who reviewed this study in a poster discussion session.
“And I think that this novel design helps to create an opportunity to limit treatment and mitigate toxicity without necessarily compromising efficacy.”
The phase 1b trial is sponsored by MEI Pharma. Dr. Zelenetz reported relationships with MEI Pharma and several other companies. Dr. Casulo reported relationships with Gilead Sciences, Celgene, and Roche.
SOURCE: Zelenetz A et al. ASCO 2019, Abstract 7512.
REPORTING FROM ASCO 2019
FDA approves lenalidomide/rituximab for previously treated FL, MZL
The Food and Drug Administration has approved lenalidomide (Revlimid), in combination with rituximab, for the treatment of adult patients with previously treated follicular or marginal zone lymphoma.
FDA approval is based on results from the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 AUGMENT trial, which evaluated lenalidomide/rituximab versus rituximab and placebo in patients with previously treated follicular or marginal zone lymphoma. The median progression-free survival in those receiving lenalidomide/rituximab was 39.4 months, compared with 14.1 months for those receiving rituximab/placebo (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.62; P less than .0001).
A numeric trend was seen in overall survival over the follow-up period of 28.3 months (16 vs. 26 deaths; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.33-1.13).
The most common adverse events associated with lenalidomide/rituximab are neutropenia, diarrhea, constipation, cough, fatigue, rash, pyrexia, leukopenia, pruritus, upper respiratory tract infections, abdominal pain, anemia, headache, and thrombocytopenia. Lenalidomide also contains a boxed warning for embryo-fetal toxicity, hematologic toxicity, and venous and arterial thromboembolism.
“Chemotherapy continues to be a standard of care for indolent forms of NHL, but most patients will relapse or become refractory to their current treatment. This approval represents a new therapeutic option for previously treated patients with follicular and marginal zone lymphomas, including those who relapse or no longer respond to initial treatment,” Meghan Gutierrez, CEO of the Lymphoma Research Foundation, said in a statement.
The Food and Drug Administration has approved lenalidomide (Revlimid), in combination with rituximab, for the treatment of adult patients with previously treated follicular or marginal zone lymphoma.
FDA approval is based on results from the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 AUGMENT trial, which evaluated lenalidomide/rituximab versus rituximab and placebo in patients with previously treated follicular or marginal zone lymphoma. The median progression-free survival in those receiving lenalidomide/rituximab was 39.4 months, compared with 14.1 months for those receiving rituximab/placebo (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.62; P less than .0001).
A numeric trend was seen in overall survival over the follow-up period of 28.3 months (16 vs. 26 deaths; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.33-1.13).
The most common adverse events associated with lenalidomide/rituximab are neutropenia, diarrhea, constipation, cough, fatigue, rash, pyrexia, leukopenia, pruritus, upper respiratory tract infections, abdominal pain, anemia, headache, and thrombocytopenia. Lenalidomide also contains a boxed warning for embryo-fetal toxicity, hematologic toxicity, and venous and arterial thromboembolism.
“Chemotherapy continues to be a standard of care for indolent forms of NHL, but most patients will relapse or become refractory to their current treatment. This approval represents a new therapeutic option for previously treated patients with follicular and marginal zone lymphomas, including those who relapse or no longer respond to initial treatment,” Meghan Gutierrez, CEO of the Lymphoma Research Foundation, said in a statement.
The Food and Drug Administration has approved lenalidomide (Revlimid), in combination with rituximab, for the treatment of adult patients with previously treated follicular or marginal zone lymphoma.
FDA approval is based on results from the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 AUGMENT trial, which evaluated lenalidomide/rituximab versus rituximab and placebo in patients with previously treated follicular or marginal zone lymphoma. The median progression-free survival in those receiving lenalidomide/rituximab was 39.4 months, compared with 14.1 months for those receiving rituximab/placebo (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.62; P less than .0001).
A numeric trend was seen in overall survival over the follow-up period of 28.3 months (16 vs. 26 deaths; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.33-1.13).
The most common adverse events associated with lenalidomide/rituximab are neutropenia, diarrhea, constipation, cough, fatigue, rash, pyrexia, leukopenia, pruritus, upper respiratory tract infections, abdominal pain, anemia, headache, and thrombocytopenia. Lenalidomide also contains a boxed warning for embryo-fetal toxicity, hematologic toxicity, and venous and arterial thromboembolism.
“Chemotherapy continues to be a standard of care for indolent forms of NHL, but most patients will relapse or become refractory to their current treatment. This approval represents a new therapeutic option for previously treated patients with follicular and marginal zone lymphomas, including those who relapse or no longer respond to initial treatment,” Meghan Gutierrez, CEO of the Lymphoma Research Foundation, said in a statement.
Trial follow-up spotlights survival gains in follicular lymphoma
Results from a 13-year follow-up of a trial comparing two types of rituximab-based chemotherapy as upfront treatment for patients with follicular lymphoma show an “extraordinary improvement” in overall survival, compared with the prerituximab era.
In a finding that the researchers termed “somewhat unexpected,” complete remission was the strongest factor in long-term survival.
Between March 2000 and May 2005, researchers enrolled 136 high-risk follicular lymphoma patients in the GITMO-IIL trial to evaluate the superiority of high-dose chemotherapy with rituximab and autograft (R-HDS) versus conventional chemotherapy with rituximab (R-CHOP) as frontline therapy. At a median follow-up of 4 years, there was no survival advantage for R-HDS.
In the current analysis – that had a 13-year median follow-up – median survival had not yet been reached. As of February 2017, two-thirds of all patients were alive at their last follow-up. Overall survival was 68.5% in the R-CHOP arm and 64.5% in the R-HDS arm, Riccardo Bruna, MD, of the European Institute of Oncology in Milano, Italy, and his colleagues, reported in Haematologica.
The main causes of death for the 46 patients who had died as of long-term follow-up were disease progression and secondary malignancies. Other causes included cardiovascular events, infections, graft failure following autograft, anaphylactic shock, and late sudden death.
Complete remission was seen in 98 patients (73.1%) overall – 59.1% in the R-CHOP arm and 86.7% in the R-HDS arm. Achieving durable complete remission was associated with prolonged survival, the researchers reported. Of the 79 patients in complete remission at 2 years after the start of treatment, 65 (82.3%) were alive at 13 years, compared with 21 (58.3%) of 36 patients who had an early relapse (P = .003).
“[Complete remission] achievement was the most important factor for prolonged survival,” the researchers wrote. “The importance of disease response is further emphasized by the first-time observation that [molecular remission] achievement is associated with survival duration and a high proportion of patients had prolonged survival in the absence of disease recurrence.”
The researchers reported that this is longest ever follow-up reported for first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma with rituximab-based chemotherapy.
This work was supported in part by the Ministero Italiano Università e Ricerca and by Banca del Piemonte. The initial clinical trial was supported by Compagnia di San Paolo, Regione Piemonte, and Roche, which provided rituximab for the study.
SOURCE: Bruna R et al. Haematologica. 2019 Apr 11. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.209932.
Results from a 13-year follow-up of a trial comparing two types of rituximab-based chemotherapy as upfront treatment for patients with follicular lymphoma show an “extraordinary improvement” in overall survival, compared with the prerituximab era.
In a finding that the researchers termed “somewhat unexpected,” complete remission was the strongest factor in long-term survival.
Between March 2000 and May 2005, researchers enrolled 136 high-risk follicular lymphoma patients in the GITMO-IIL trial to evaluate the superiority of high-dose chemotherapy with rituximab and autograft (R-HDS) versus conventional chemotherapy with rituximab (R-CHOP) as frontline therapy. At a median follow-up of 4 years, there was no survival advantage for R-HDS.
In the current analysis – that had a 13-year median follow-up – median survival had not yet been reached. As of February 2017, two-thirds of all patients were alive at their last follow-up. Overall survival was 68.5% in the R-CHOP arm and 64.5% in the R-HDS arm, Riccardo Bruna, MD, of the European Institute of Oncology in Milano, Italy, and his colleagues, reported in Haematologica.
The main causes of death for the 46 patients who had died as of long-term follow-up were disease progression and secondary malignancies. Other causes included cardiovascular events, infections, graft failure following autograft, anaphylactic shock, and late sudden death.
Complete remission was seen in 98 patients (73.1%) overall – 59.1% in the R-CHOP arm and 86.7% in the R-HDS arm. Achieving durable complete remission was associated with prolonged survival, the researchers reported. Of the 79 patients in complete remission at 2 years after the start of treatment, 65 (82.3%) were alive at 13 years, compared with 21 (58.3%) of 36 patients who had an early relapse (P = .003).
“[Complete remission] achievement was the most important factor for prolonged survival,” the researchers wrote. “The importance of disease response is further emphasized by the first-time observation that [molecular remission] achievement is associated with survival duration and a high proportion of patients had prolonged survival in the absence of disease recurrence.”
The researchers reported that this is longest ever follow-up reported for first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma with rituximab-based chemotherapy.
This work was supported in part by the Ministero Italiano Università e Ricerca and by Banca del Piemonte. The initial clinical trial was supported by Compagnia di San Paolo, Regione Piemonte, and Roche, which provided rituximab for the study.
SOURCE: Bruna R et al. Haematologica. 2019 Apr 11. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.209932.
Results from a 13-year follow-up of a trial comparing two types of rituximab-based chemotherapy as upfront treatment for patients with follicular lymphoma show an “extraordinary improvement” in overall survival, compared with the prerituximab era.
In a finding that the researchers termed “somewhat unexpected,” complete remission was the strongest factor in long-term survival.
Between March 2000 and May 2005, researchers enrolled 136 high-risk follicular lymphoma patients in the GITMO-IIL trial to evaluate the superiority of high-dose chemotherapy with rituximab and autograft (R-HDS) versus conventional chemotherapy with rituximab (R-CHOP) as frontline therapy. At a median follow-up of 4 years, there was no survival advantage for R-HDS.
In the current analysis – that had a 13-year median follow-up – median survival had not yet been reached. As of February 2017, two-thirds of all patients were alive at their last follow-up. Overall survival was 68.5% in the R-CHOP arm and 64.5% in the R-HDS arm, Riccardo Bruna, MD, of the European Institute of Oncology in Milano, Italy, and his colleagues, reported in Haematologica.
The main causes of death for the 46 patients who had died as of long-term follow-up were disease progression and secondary malignancies. Other causes included cardiovascular events, infections, graft failure following autograft, anaphylactic shock, and late sudden death.
Complete remission was seen in 98 patients (73.1%) overall – 59.1% in the R-CHOP arm and 86.7% in the R-HDS arm. Achieving durable complete remission was associated with prolonged survival, the researchers reported. Of the 79 patients in complete remission at 2 years after the start of treatment, 65 (82.3%) were alive at 13 years, compared with 21 (58.3%) of 36 patients who had an early relapse (P = .003).
“[Complete remission] achievement was the most important factor for prolonged survival,” the researchers wrote. “The importance of disease response is further emphasized by the first-time observation that [molecular remission] achievement is associated with survival duration and a high proportion of patients had prolonged survival in the absence of disease recurrence.”
The researchers reported that this is longest ever follow-up reported for first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma with rituximab-based chemotherapy.
This work was supported in part by the Ministero Italiano Università e Ricerca and by Banca del Piemonte. The initial clinical trial was supported by Compagnia di San Paolo, Regione Piemonte, and Roche, which provided rituximab for the study.
SOURCE: Bruna R et al. Haematologica. 2019 Apr 11. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.209932.
FROM HAEMATOLOGICA