User login
Legal Issues for the Gastroenterologist: Part II
In the previous issue of The New Gastroenterologist, we discussed statistics and the basis on which most gastroenterologists are sued as well as what you can do to minimize this risk. In this second article, we discuss steps to assist in your defense in the event you have been sued. The following suggestions are based on our experience as defense attorneys who practice in the arena of medical malpractice.
Do not, under any circumstances, add or alter the plaintiff’s medical records. Although you have continued access to electronic medical records, accessing or altering these documents leaves an electronic trail. Attorneys are now frequently requesting an “audit trail” during discovery, which shows who and when someone accessed or altered relevant medical records. Additionally, it is likely that the plaintiff’s counsel has already obtained and reviewed records for their client. As such, counsel will notice any alterations and will require an explanation as to the same. If you did alter any medical records, it is important that you notify your attorney about the specifics of such.
After you have secured an attorney, it is critical that you arrange a meeting to develop a positive relationship early in the litigation process. This is important for many reasons. A medical malpractice case can be a long and arduous process which requires that you be involved with your attorney during the course of the litigation. For the attorney-client relationship to be successful, it is imperative that you know and feel comfortable with your attorney and develop confidence and trust in her. Without this trust, it will be difficult for you to accept various decisions or suggestions that the attorney believes are in your best interest. Conversely, the attorney should get to know you and understand your background, as this will assist in your representation.
A good relationship with you will also aid your attorney in educating herself on medical concepts relating to your case. Remember, your attorney most likely has not attended medical school and many of the medical concepts will initially be new to her. By the time trial arrives, however, your attorney will be very familiar with the medical issues in your case. This learning process can be expedited with your assistance and research.
Your deposition
At some point during the lawsuit, the plaintiff’s attorney will take your deposition. The plaintiff’s attorney will strive to obtain concessions that establish the standard of care, breach of the standard, causation, and damages. Your deposition is not the time for you to provide explanations. It is the time for you to concisely answer specific questions posed by counsel without volunteering any additional information. Ultimately, trials build on what occurs during depositions. Preparation is key. Be open to advice or criticisms from your lawyer. Try to eliminate any quirks or habits that interfere with the substance of your testimony or perceived credibility. A deposition is not a casual conversation, nor is it a test of your memory. Limit your answers to personal knowledge; never guess or speculate. If you do not know the answer to a question, or do not remember something, it is perfectly acceptable for you to say so. Only answer questions that you understand. You are allowed to ask the plaintiff’s counsel to repeat or rephrase questions.
Finally, and most importantly, always tell the truth. Discuss any anticipated issues or concerns with your lawyer before your deposition.
Preparing for trial
Conclusion
In summary, remember that there are things you can do both before and after you are sued to minimize litigation and its impact. As mentioned previously, before a lawsuit, and as a regular part of your practice, it is important that you stay current with medical advances, that you take the time to create a relationship with your patients involving quality communication, and that you thoroughly and legibly document all aspects of care provided. After a suit is filed against you, make sure you notify your insurer immediately, do not alter any records or discuss the case with anyone other than your lawyer or spouse, and do all you can to create a productive and honest relationship with your lawyer. This relationship will be invaluable as you do the difficult and time-consuming work of preparing for your deposition and trial, and it can help you endure and successfully navigate the litigation process.
The Importance of Follow-Up: Further Advice on How to Decrease the Risk of Being Sued
A common basis for establishing a malpractice liability claim against a physician is the failure to follow-up or track a patient’s test results. In today’s world, there is an increasing number of moving parts involved in any given patient’s care. A particular patient may treat with numerous physicians, all of whom use different record systems. Electronic medical record systems have made records more accessible and easier to track, but they also present a new set of challenges.
Every physician needs to determine how they plan to track test results. The ideal system would allow a physician to quickly get back any lab or diagnostic test that he or she orders. All staff members should know how the physician’s system works. Otherwise, test results might accidentally be filed before the physician reviews them or a miscommunication could prevent test results from being delivered. Whatever choice of system, it is key to follow and effectively use the program every time.
Additionally, it can be beneficial to let the patient know when he or she can expect to hear about their results, as failure to keep the patient reasonably informed can create a new set of patient concerns and anxiety. Ultimately, establishing a well-defined system for record-tracking can help physicians avoid malpractice liability claims because of a failure to follow-up.
In the previous issue of The New Gastroenterologist, we discussed statistics and the basis on which most gastroenterologists are sued as well as what you can do to minimize this risk. In this second article, we discuss steps to assist in your defense in the event you have been sued. The following suggestions are based on our experience as defense attorneys who practice in the arena of medical malpractice.
Do not, under any circumstances, add or alter the plaintiff’s medical records. Although you have continued access to electronic medical records, accessing or altering these documents leaves an electronic trail. Attorneys are now frequently requesting an “audit trail” during discovery, which shows who and when someone accessed or altered relevant medical records. Additionally, it is likely that the plaintiff’s counsel has already obtained and reviewed records for their client. As such, counsel will notice any alterations and will require an explanation as to the same. If you did alter any medical records, it is important that you notify your attorney about the specifics of such.
After you have secured an attorney, it is critical that you arrange a meeting to develop a positive relationship early in the litigation process. This is important for many reasons. A medical malpractice case can be a long and arduous process which requires that you be involved with your attorney during the course of the litigation. For the attorney-client relationship to be successful, it is imperative that you know and feel comfortable with your attorney and develop confidence and trust in her. Without this trust, it will be difficult for you to accept various decisions or suggestions that the attorney believes are in your best interest. Conversely, the attorney should get to know you and understand your background, as this will assist in your representation.
A good relationship with you will also aid your attorney in educating herself on medical concepts relating to your case. Remember, your attorney most likely has not attended medical school and many of the medical concepts will initially be new to her. By the time trial arrives, however, your attorney will be very familiar with the medical issues in your case. This learning process can be expedited with your assistance and research.
Your deposition
At some point during the lawsuit, the plaintiff’s attorney will take your deposition. The plaintiff’s attorney will strive to obtain concessions that establish the standard of care, breach of the standard, causation, and damages. Your deposition is not the time for you to provide explanations. It is the time for you to concisely answer specific questions posed by counsel without volunteering any additional information. Ultimately, trials build on what occurs during depositions. Preparation is key. Be open to advice or criticisms from your lawyer. Try to eliminate any quirks or habits that interfere with the substance of your testimony or perceived credibility. A deposition is not a casual conversation, nor is it a test of your memory. Limit your answers to personal knowledge; never guess or speculate. If you do not know the answer to a question, or do not remember something, it is perfectly acceptable for you to say so. Only answer questions that you understand. You are allowed to ask the plaintiff’s counsel to repeat or rephrase questions.
Finally, and most importantly, always tell the truth. Discuss any anticipated issues or concerns with your lawyer before your deposition.
Preparing for trial
Conclusion
In summary, remember that there are things you can do both before and after you are sued to minimize litigation and its impact. As mentioned previously, before a lawsuit, and as a regular part of your practice, it is important that you stay current with medical advances, that you take the time to create a relationship with your patients involving quality communication, and that you thoroughly and legibly document all aspects of care provided. After a suit is filed against you, make sure you notify your insurer immediately, do not alter any records or discuss the case with anyone other than your lawyer or spouse, and do all you can to create a productive and honest relationship with your lawyer. This relationship will be invaluable as you do the difficult and time-consuming work of preparing for your deposition and trial, and it can help you endure and successfully navigate the litigation process.
The Importance of Follow-Up: Further Advice on How to Decrease the Risk of Being Sued
A common basis for establishing a malpractice liability claim against a physician is the failure to follow-up or track a patient’s test results. In today’s world, there is an increasing number of moving parts involved in any given patient’s care. A particular patient may treat with numerous physicians, all of whom use different record systems. Electronic medical record systems have made records more accessible and easier to track, but they also present a new set of challenges.
Every physician needs to determine how they plan to track test results. The ideal system would allow a physician to quickly get back any lab or diagnostic test that he or she orders. All staff members should know how the physician’s system works. Otherwise, test results might accidentally be filed before the physician reviews them or a miscommunication could prevent test results from being delivered. Whatever choice of system, it is key to follow and effectively use the program every time.
Additionally, it can be beneficial to let the patient know when he or she can expect to hear about their results, as failure to keep the patient reasonably informed can create a new set of patient concerns and anxiety. Ultimately, establishing a well-defined system for record-tracking can help physicians avoid malpractice liability claims because of a failure to follow-up.
In the previous issue of The New Gastroenterologist, we discussed statistics and the basis on which most gastroenterologists are sued as well as what you can do to minimize this risk. In this second article, we discuss steps to assist in your defense in the event you have been sued. The following suggestions are based on our experience as defense attorneys who practice in the arena of medical malpractice.
Do not, under any circumstances, add or alter the plaintiff’s medical records. Although you have continued access to electronic medical records, accessing or altering these documents leaves an electronic trail. Attorneys are now frequently requesting an “audit trail” during discovery, which shows who and when someone accessed or altered relevant medical records. Additionally, it is likely that the plaintiff’s counsel has already obtained and reviewed records for their client. As such, counsel will notice any alterations and will require an explanation as to the same. If you did alter any medical records, it is important that you notify your attorney about the specifics of such.
After you have secured an attorney, it is critical that you arrange a meeting to develop a positive relationship early in the litigation process. This is important for many reasons. A medical malpractice case can be a long and arduous process which requires that you be involved with your attorney during the course of the litigation. For the attorney-client relationship to be successful, it is imperative that you know and feel comfortable with your attorney and develop confidence and trust in her. Without this trust, it will be difficult for you to accept various decisions or suggestions that the attorney believes are in your best interest. Conversely, the attorney should get to know you and understand your background, as this will assist in your representation.
A good relationship with you will also aid your attorney in educating herself on medical concepts relating to your case. Remember, your attorney most likely has not attended medical school and many of the medical concepts will initially be new to her. By the time trial arrives, however, your attorney will be very familiar with the medical issues in your case. This learning process can be expedited with your assistance and research.
Your deposition
At some point during the lawsuit, the plaintiff’s attorney will take your deposition. The plaintiff’s attorney will strive to obtain concessions that establish the standard of care, breach of the standard, causation, and damages. Your deposition is not the time for you to provide explanations. It is the time for you to concisely answer specific questions posed by counsel without volunteering any additional information. Ultimately, trials build on what occurs during depositions. Preparation is key. Be open to advice or criticisms from your lawyer. Try to eliminate any quirks or habits that interfere with the substance of your testimony or perceived credibility. A deposition is not a casual conversation, nor is it a test of your memory. Limit your answers to personal knowledge; never guess or speculate. If you do not know the answer to a question, or do not remember something, it is perfectly acceptable for you to say so. Only answer questions that you understand. You are allowed to ask the plaintiff’s counsel to repeat or rephrase questions.
Finally, and most importantly, always tell the truth. Discuss any anticipated issues or concerns with your lawyer before your deposition.
Preparing for trial
Conclusion
In summary, remember that there are things you can do both before and after you are sued to minimize litigation and its impact. As mentioned previously, before a lawsuit, and as a regular part of your practice, it is important that you stay current with medical advances, that you take the time to create a relationship with your patients involving quality communication, and that you thoroughly and legibly document all aspects of care provided. After a suit is filed against you, make sure you notify your insurer immediately, do not alter any records or discuss the case with anyone other than your lawyer or spouse, and do all you can to create a productive and honest relationship with your lawyer. This relationship will be invaluable as you do the difficult and time-consuming work of preparing for your deposition and trial, and it can help you endure and successfully navigate the litigation process.
The Importance of Follow-Up: Further Advice on How to Decrease the Risk of Being Sued
A common basis for establishing a malpractice liability claim against a physician is the failure to follow-up or track a patient’s test results. In today’s world, there is an increasing number of moving parts involved in any given patient’s care. A particular patient may treat with numerous physicians, all of whom use different record systems. Electronic medical record systems have made records more accessible and easier to track, but they also present a new set of challenges.
Every physician needs to determine how they plan to track test results. The ideal system would allow a physician to quickly get back any lab or diagnostic test that he or she orders. All staff members should know how the physician’s system works. Otherwise, test results might accidentally be filed before the physician reviews them or a miscommunication could prevent test results from being delivered. Whatever choice of system, it is key to follow and effectively use the program every time.
Additionally, it can be beneficial to let the patient know when he or she can expect to hear about their results, as failure to keep the patient reasonably informed can create a new set of patient concerns and anxiety. Ultimately, establishing a well-defined system for record-tracking can help physicians avoid malpractice liability claims because of a failure to follow-up.