User login
What’s Eating You? The South African Fattail Scorpion Revisited
Identification
The South African fattail scorpion (Parabuthus transvaalicus)(Figure) is one of the most poisonous scorpions in southern Africa.1 A member of the Buthidae scorpion family, it can grow as long as 15 cm and is dark brown-black with lighter red-brown pincers. Similar to other fattail scorpions, it has slender pincers (pedipalps) and a thick square tail (the telson). Parabuthus transvaalicus inhabits hot dry deserts, scrublands, and semiarid regions.1,2 It also is popular in exotic pet collections, the most common source of stings in the United States.
Stings and Envenomation
Scorpions with thicker tails generally have more potent venom than those with slender tails and thick pincers. Venom is injected by a stinger at the tip of the telson1; P transvaalicus also can spray venom as far as 3 m.1,2 Venom is not known to cause toxicity through skin contact but could represent a hazard if sprayed in the eye.
Scorpion toxins are a group of complex neurotoxins that act on sodium channels, either retarding inactivation (α toxin) or enhancing activation (β toxin), causing massive depolarization of excitable cells.1,3 The toxin causes neurons to fire repetitively.4 Neurotransmitters—noradrenaline, adrenaline, and acetylcholine—cause the observed sympathetic, parasympathetic, and skeletal muscle effects.1
Incidence
Worldwide, more than 1.2 million individuals are stung by a scorpion annually, causing more than 3250 deaths a year.5 Adults are stung more often, but children experience more severe envenomation, are more likely to develop severe illness requiring intensive supportive care, and have a higher mortality.4
As many as one-third of patients stung by a Parabuthus scorpion develop neuromuscular toxicity, which can be life-threatening.6 In a study of 277 envenomations by P transvaalicus, 10% of patients developed severe symptoms and 5 died. Children younger than 10 years and adults older than 50 years are at greatest risk for
Clinical Presentation
The clinical presentation of scorpion envenomation varies with the species involved, the amount of venom injected, and the victim’s weight and baseline health.1 Scorpion envenomation is divided into 4 grades based on the severity of a sting:
• Grade I: pain and paresthesia at the envenomation site; usually, no local inflammation
• Grade II: local symptoms as well as more remote pain and paresthesia; pain can radiate up the affected limb
• Grade III: cranial nerve or somatic skeletal neuromuscular dysfunction; either presentation can have associated autonomic dysfunction
• Grade IV: both cranial nerve and somatic skeletal neuromuscular dysfunction, with associated auto-nomic dysfunction
The initial symptom of a scorpion sting is intense burning pain. The sting site might be unimpressive, with only a mild local reaction. Symptoms usually progress to maximum severity within 5 hours.1 Muscle pain, cramps, and weakness are prominent. The patient might have difficulty walking and swallowing, with increased salivation and drooling, and visual disturbance with abnormal eye movements. Pulse, blood pressure, and temperature often are elevated. The patient might be hyperreflexic with clonus.1,6
Symptoms of increased sympathetic activity are hypertension, tachycardia, cardiac dysrhythmia, perspiration, hyperglycemia, and restlessness.1,2 Parasympathetic effects are increased salivation, hypotension, bradycardia, and gastric distension. Skeletal muscle effects include tremors and involuntary muscle movement, which can be severe. Cranial nerve dysfunction may manifest as dysphagia, drooling, abnormal eye movements, blurred vision, slurred speech, and tongue fasciculations. Subsequent development of muscle weakness, bulbar paralysis, and difficulty breathing may be caused by depletion of neurotransmitters after prolonged excessive neuronal activity.1
Distinctive Signs in Younger Patients
A child who is stung by a scorpion might have symptoms similar to those seen in an adult victim but can also experience an extreme form of restlessness that indicates severe envenomation characterized by inability to lay still, violent muscle twitching, and uncontrollable flailing of extremities. The child might have facial grimacing, with lip-smacking and chewing motions. In addition, bulbar paralysis and respiratory distress are more likely in children who have been stung than in adults.1,2
Management
Treatment of a P transvaalicus sting is directed at “scorpionism,” envenomation that is associated with systemic symptoms that can be life-threatening. Treatment comprises support of vital functions, symptomatic measures, and injection of antivenin.8
Support of Vital Functions
In adults, systemic symptoms can be delayed as long as 8 hours after the sting. However, most severe cases usually are evident within 60 minutes; infants can reach grade IV as quickly as 15 to 30 minutes.9,10 Loss of pharyngeal reflexes and development of respiratory distress are ominous warning signs requiring immediate respiratory support. Respiratory failure is the most common cause of death.1 An asymptomatic child should be admitted to a hospital for observation for a minimum of 12 hours if the species of scorpion was not identified.2
Pain Relief
Most patients cannot tolerate an ice pack because of severe hyperesthesia. Infiltration of the local sting site with an anesthetic generally is safe and can provide some local pain relief. Intravenous fentanyl has been used in closely monitored patients because the drug is not associated with histamine release. Medications that cause release of histamine, such as morphine, can exacerbate or confuse the clinical picture.
Antivenin
Scorpion antivenin contains purified IgG fragments; allergic reactions are now rare. The sooner antivenin is administered, the greater the benefit. When administered early, it can prevent many of the most serious complications.7 In a randomized, double-blind study of critically ill children with clinically significant signs of scorpion envenomation, intravenous administration of scorpion-specific fragment antigen-binding 2 (F[(ab’]2) antivenin resulted in resolution of clinical symptoms within 4 hours.11
When managing grade III or IV scorpion envenomation, all patients should be admitted to a medical facility equipped to provide intensive supportive care; consider consultation with a regional poison control center. The World Health Organization maintains an international poison control center (at https://www.who.int/ipcs/poisons/centre/en/) with regional telephone numbers; alternatively, in the United States, call the nationwide telephone number of the Poison Control Center (800-222-1222).
The World Health Organization has identified declining production of antivenin as a crisis.12
Resolution
Symptoms of envenomation typically resolve 9 to 30 hours after a sting in a patient with grade III or IV envenomation not treated with antivenin.4 However, pain and paresthesia occasionally last as long as 2 weeks. In rare cases, more long-term sequelae of burning paresthesia persist for months.4
Conclusion
It is important for dermatologists to be aware of the potential for life-threatening envenomation by certain scorpion species native to southern Africa. In the United States, stings of these species most often are seen in patients with a pet collection, but late sequelae also can be seen in travelers returning from an endemic region. The site of a sting often appears unimpressive initially, but severe hyperesthesia is common. Patients with cardiac, neurologic, or respiratory symptoms require intensive supportive care. Proper care can be lifesaving.
- Müller GJ, Modler H, Wium CA, et al. Scorpion sting in southern Africa: diagnosis and management. Continuing Medical Education. 2012;30:356-361.
- Müller GJ. Scorpionism in South Africa. a report of 42 serious scorpion envenomations. S Afr Med J. 1993;83:405-411.
- Quintero-Hernández V, Jiménez-Vargas JM, Gurrola GB, et al. Scorpion venom components that affect ion-channels function. Toxicon. 2013;76:328-342.
- LoVecchio F, McBride C. Scorpion envenomations in young children in central Arizona. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2003;41:937-940.
- Chippaux JP, Goyffon M. Epidemiology of scorpionism: a global appraisal. Acta Trop. 2008;107:71-79.
- Bergman NJ. Clinical description of Parabuthus transvaalicus scorpionism in Zimbabwe. Toxicon. 1997;35:759-771.
- Chippaux JP. Emerging options for the management of scorpion stings. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2012;6:165-173.
- Santos MS, Silva CG, Neto BS, et al. Clinical and epidemiological aspects of scorpionism in the world: a systematic review. Wilderness Environ Med. 2016;27:504-518.
- Amaral CF, Rezende NA. Both cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic factors are involved in the pathogenesis of pulmonary oedema after scorpion envenoming. Toxicon. 1997;35:997-998.
- Bergman NJ. Scorpion sting in Zimbabwe. S Afr Med J. 1997;87:163-167.
- Boyer LV, Theodorou AA, Berg RA, et al; Arizona Envenomation Investigators. antivenom for critically ill children with neurotoxicity from scorpion stings. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2090-2098.
- Theakston RD, Warrell DA, Griffiths E. Report of a WHO workshop on the standardization and control of antivenoms. Toxicon. 2003;41:541-557.
Identification
The South African fattail scorpion (Parabuthus transvaalicus)(Figure) is one of the most poisonous scorpions in southern Africa.1 A member of the Buthidae scorpion family, it can grow as long as 15 cm and is dark brown-black with lighter red-brown pincers. Similar to other fattail scorpions, it has slender pincers (pedipalps) and a thick square tail (the telson). Parabuthus transvaalicus inhabits hot dry deserts, scrublands, and semiarid regions.1,2 It also is popular in exotic pet collections, the most common source of stings in the United States.
Stings and Envenomation
Scorpions with thicker tails generally have more potent venom than those with slender tails and thick pincers. Venom is injected by a stinger at the tip of the telson1; P transvaalicus also can spray venom as far as 3 m.1,2 Venom is not known to cause toxicity through skin contact but could represent a hazard if sprayed in the eye.
Scorpion toxins are a group of complex neurotoxins that act on sodium channels, either retarding inactivation (α toxin) or enhancing activation (β toxin), causing massive depolarization of excitable cells.1,3 The toxin causes neurons to fire repetitively.4 Neurotransmitters—noradrenaline, adrenaline, and acetylcholine—cause the observed sympathetic, parasympathetic, and skeletal muscle effects.1
Incidence
Worldwide, more than 1.2 million individuals are stung by a scorpion annually, causing more than 3250 deaths a year.5 Adults are stung more often, but children experience more severe envenomation, are more likely to develop severe illness requiring intensive supportive care, and have a higher mortality.4
As many as one-third of patients stung by a Parabuthus scorpion develop neuromuscular toxicity, which can be life-threatening.6 In a study of 277 envenomations by P transvaalicus, 10% of patients developed severe symptoms and 5 died. Children younger than 10 years and adults older than 50 years are at greatest risk for
Clinical Presentation
The clinical presentation of scorpion envenomation varies with the species involved, the amount of venom injected, and the victim’s weight and baseline health.1 Scorpion envenomation is divided into 4 grades based on the severity of a sting:
• Grade I: pain and paresthesia at the envenomation site; usually, no local inflammation
• Grade II: local symptoms as well as more remote pain and paresthesia; pain can radiate up the affected limb
• Grade III: cranial nerve or somatic skeletal neuromuscular dysfunction; either presentation can have associated autonomic dysfunction
• Grade IV: both cranial nerve and somatic skeletal neuromuscular dysfunction, with associated auto-nomic dysfunction
The initial symptom of a scorpion sting is intense burning pain. The sting site might be unimpressive, with only a mild local reaction. Symptoms usually progress to maximum severity within 5 hours.1 Muscle pain, cramps, and weakness are prominent. The patient might have difficulty walking and swallowing, with increased salivation and drooling, and visual disturbance with abnormal eye movements. Pulse, blood pressure, and temperature often are elevated. The patient might be hyperreflexic with clonus.1,6
Symptoms of increased sympathetic activity are hypertension, tachycardia, cardiac dysrhythmia, perspiration, hyperglycemia, and restlessness.1,2 Parasympathetic effects are increased salivation, hypotension, bradycardia, and gastric distension. Skeletal muscle effects include tremors and involuntary muscle movement, which can be severe. Cranial nerve dysfunction may manifest as dysphagia, drooling, abnormal eye movements, blurred vision, slurred speech, and tongue fasciculations. Subsequent development of muscle weakness, bulbar paralysis, and difficulty breathing may be caused by depletion of neurotransmitters after prolonged excessive neuronal activity.1
Distinctive Signs in Younger Patients
A child who is stung by a scorpion might have symptoms similar to those seen in an adult victim but can also experience an extreme form of restlessness that indicates severe envenomation characterized by inability to lay still, violent muscle twitching, and uncontrollable flailing of extremities. The child might have facial grimacing, with lip-smacking and chewing motions. In addition, bulbar paralysis and respiratory distress are more likely in children who have been stung than in adults.1,2
Management
Treatment of a P transvaalicus sting is directed at “scorpionism,” envenomation that is associated with systemic symptoms that can be life-threatening. Treatment comprises support of vital functions, symptomatic measures, and injection of antivenin.8
Support of Vital Functions
In adults, systemic symptoms can be delayed as long as 8 hours after the sting. However, most severe cases usually are evident within 60 minutes; infants can reach grade IV as quickly as 15 to 30 minutes.9,10 Loss of pharyngeal reflexes and development of respiratory distress are ominous warning signs requiring immediate respiratory support. Respiratory failure is the most common cause of death.1 An asymptomatic child should be admitted to a hospital for observation for a minimum of 12 hours if the species of scorpion was not identified.2
Pain Relief
Most patients cannot tolerate an ice pack because of severe hyperesthesia. Infiltration of the local sting site with an anesthetic generally is safe and can provide some local pain relief. Intravenous fentanyl has been used in closely monitored patients because the drug is not associated with histamine release. Medications that cause release of histamine, such as morphine, can exacerbate or confuse the clinical picture.
Antivenin
Scorpion antivenin contains purified IgG fragments; allergic reactions are now rare. The sooner antivenin is administered, the greater the benefit. When administered early, it can prevent many of the most serious complications.7 In a randomized, double-blind study of critically ill children with clinically significant signs of scorpion envenomation, intravenous administration of scorpion-specific fragment antigen-binding 2 (F[(ab’]2) antivenin resulted in resolution of clinical symptoms within 4 hours.11
When managing grade III or IV scorpion envenomation, all patients should be admitted to a medical facility equipped to provide intensive supportive care; consider consultation with a regional poison control center. The World Health Organization maintains an international poison control center (at https://www.who.int/ipcs/poisons/centre/en/) with regional telephone numbers; alternatively, in the United States, call the nationwide telephone number of the Poison Control Center (800-222-1222).
The World Health Organization has identified declining production of antivenin as a crisis.12
Resolution
Symptoms of envenomation typically resolve 9 to 30 hours after a sting in a patient with grade III or IV envenomation not treated with antivenin.4 However, pain and paresthesia occasionally last as long as 2 weeks. In rare cases, more long-term sequelae of burning paresthesia persist for months.4
Conclusion
It is important for dermatologists to be aware of the potential for life-threatening envenomation by certain scorpion species native to southern Africa. In the United States, stings of these species most often are seen in patients with a pet collection, but late sequelae also can be seen in travelers returning from an endemic region. The site of a sting often appears unimpressive initially, but severe hyperesthesia is common. Patients with cardiac, neurologic, or respiratory symptoms require intensive supportive care. Proper care can be lifesaving.
Identification
The South African fattail scorpion (Parabuthus transvaalicus)(Figure) is one of the most poisonous scorpions in southern Africa.1 A member of the Buthidae scorpion family, it can grow as long as 15 cm and is dark brown-black with lighter red-brown pincers. Similar to other fattail scorpions, it has slender pincers (pedipalps) and a thick square tail (the telson). Parabuthus transvaalicus inhabits hot dry deserts, scrublands, and semiarid regions.1,2 It also is popular in exotic pet collections, the most common source of stings in the United States.
Stings and Envenomation
Scorpions with thicker tails generally have more potent venom than those with slender tails and thick pincers. Venom is injected by a stinger at the tip of the telson1; P transvaalicus also can spray venom as far as 3 m.1,2 Venom is not known to cause toxicity through skin contact but could represent a hazard if sprayed in the eye.
Scorpion toxins are a group of complex neurotoxins that act on sodium channels, either retarding inactivation (α toxin) or enhancing activation (β toxin), causing massive depolarization of excitable cells.1,3 The toxin causes neurons to fire repetitively.4 Neurotransmitters—noradrenaline, adrenaline, and acetylcholine—cause the observed sympathetic, parasympathetic, and skeletal muscle effects.1
Incidence
Worldwide, more than 1.2 million individuals are stung by a scorpion annually, causing more than 3250 deaths a year.5 Adults are stung more often, but children experience more severe envenomation, are more likely to develop severe illness requiring intensive supportive care, and have a higher mortality.4
As many as one-third of patients stung by a Parabuthus scorpion develop neuromuscular toxicity, which can be life-threatening.6 In a study of 277 envenomations by P transvaalicus, 10% of patients developed severe symptoms and 5 died. Children younger than 10 years and adults older than 50 years are at greatest risk for
Clinical Presentation
The clinical presentation of scorpion envenomation varies with the species involved, the amount of venom injected, and the victim’s weight and baseline health.1 Scorpion envenomation is divided into 4 grades based on the severity of a sting:
• Grade I: pain and paresthesia at the envenomation site; usually, no local inflammation
• Grade II: local symptoms as well as more remote pain and paresthesia; pain can radiate up the affected limb
• Grade III: cranial nerve or somatic skeletal neuromuscular dysfunction; either presentation can have associated autonomic dysfunction
• Grade IV: both cranial nerve and somatic skeletal neuromuscular dysfunction, with associated auto-nomic dysfunction
The initial symptom of a scorpion sting is intense burning pain. The sting site might be unimpressive, with only a mild local reaction. Symptoms usually progress to maximum severity within 5 hours.1 Muscle pain, cramps, and weakness are prominent. The patient might have difficulty walking and swallowing, with increased salivation and drooling, and visual disturbance with abnormal eye movements. Pulse, blood pressure, and temperature often are elevated. The patient might be hyperreflexic with clonus.1,6
Symptoms of increased sympathetic activity are hypertension, tachycardia, cardiac dysrhythmia, perspiration, hyperglycemia, and restlessness.1,2 Parasympathetic effects are increased salivation, hypotension, bradycardia, and gastric distension. Skeletal muscle effects include tremors and involuntary muscle movement, which can be severe. Cranial nerve dysfunction may manifest as dysphagia, drooling, abnormal eye movements, blurred vision, slurred speech, and tongue fasciculations. Subsequent development of muscle weakness, bulbar paralysis, and difficulty breathing may be caused by depletion of neurotransmitters after prolonged excessive neuronal activity.1
Distinctive Signs in Younger Patients
A child who is stung by a scorpion might have symptoms similar to those seen in an adult victim but can also experience an extreme form of restlessness that indicates severe envenomation characterized by inability to lay still, violent muscle twitching, and uncontrollable flailing of extremities. The child might have facial grimacing, with lip-smacking and chewing motions. In addition, bulbar paralysis and respiratory distress are more likely in children who have been stung than in adults.1,2
Management
Treatment of a P transvaalicus sting is directed at “scorpionism,” envenomation that is associated with systemic symptoms that can be life-threatening. Treatment comprises support of vital functions, symptomatic measures, and injection of antivenin.8
Support of Vital Functions
In adults, systemic symptoms can be delayed as long as 8 hours after the sting. However, most severe cases usually are evident within 60 minutes; infants can reach grade IV as quickly as 15 to 30 minutes.9,10 Loss of pharyngeal reflexes and development of respiratory distress are ominous warning signs requiring immediate respiratory support. Respiratory failure is the most common cause of death.1 An asymptomatic child should be admitted to a hospital for observation for a minimum of 12 hours if the species of scorpion was not identified.2
Pain Relief
Most patients cannot tolerate an ice pack because of severe hyperesthesia. Infiltration of the local sting site with an anesthetic generally is safe and can provide some local pain relief. Intravenous fentanyl has been used in closely monitored patients because the drug is not associated with histamine release. Medications that cause release of histamine, such as morphine, can exacerbate or confuse the clinical picture.
Antivenin
Scorpion antivenin contains purified IgG fragments; allergic reactions are now rare. The sooner antivenin is administered, the greater the benefit. When administered early, it can prevent many of the most serious complications.7 In a randomized, double-blind study of critically ill children with clinically significant signs of scorpion envenomation, intravenous administration of scorpion-specific fragment antigen-binding 2 (F[(ab’]2) antivenin resulted in resolution of clinical symptoms within 4 hours.11
When managing grade III or IV scorpion envenomation, all patients should be admitted to a medical facility equipped to provide intensive supportive care; consider consultation with a regional poison control center. The World Health Organization maintains an international poison control center (at https://www.who.int/ipcs/poisons/centre/en/) with regional telephone numbers; alternatively, in the United States, call the nationwide telephone number of the Poison Control Center (800-222-1222).
The World Health Organization has identified declining production of antivenin as a crisis.12
Resolution
Symptoms of envenomation typically resolve 9 to 30 hours after a sting in a patient with grade III or IV envenomation not treated with antivenin.4 However, pain and paresthesia occasionally last as long as 2 weeks. In rare cases, more long-term sequelae of burning paresthesia persist for months.4
Conclusion
It is important for dermatologists to be aware of the potential for life-threatening envenomation by certain scorpion species native to southern Africa. In the United States, stings of these species most often are seen in patients with a pet collection, but late sequelae also can be seen in travelers returning from an endemic region. The site of a sting often appears unimpressive initially, but severe hyperesthesia is common. Patients with cardiac, neurologic, or respiratory symptoms require intensive supportive care. Proper care can be lifesaving.
- Müller GJ, Modler H, Wium CA, et al. Scorpion sting in southern Africa: diagnosis and management. Continuing Medical Education. 2012;30:356-361.
- Müller GJ. Scorpionism in South Africa. a report of 42 serious scorpion envenomations. S Afr Med J. 1993;83:405-411.
- Quintero-Hernández V, Jiménez-Vargas JM, Gurrola GB, et al. Scorpion venom components that affect ion-channels function. Toxicon. 2013;76:328-342.
- LoVecchio F, McBride C. Scorpion envenomations in young children in central Arizona. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2003;41:937-940.
- Chippaux JP, Goyffon M. Epidemiology of scorpionism: a global appraisal. Acta Trop. 2008;107:71-79.
- Bergman NJ. Clinical description of Parabuthus transvaalicus scorpionism in Zimbabwe. Toxicon. 1997;35:759-771.
- Chippaux JP. Emerging options for the management of scorpion stings. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2012;6:165-173.
- Santos MS, Silva CG, Neto BS, et al. Clinical and epidemiological aspects of scorpionism in the world: a systematic review. Wilderness Environ Med. 2016;27:504-518.
- Amaral CF, Rezende NA. Both cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic factors are involved in the pathogenesis of pulmonary oedema after scorpion envenoming. Toxicon. 1997;35:997-998.
- Bergman NJ. Scorpion sting in Zimbabwe. S Afr Med J. 1997;87:163-167.
- Boyer LV, Theodorou AA, Berg RA, et al; Arizona Envenomation Investigators. antivenom for critically ill children with neurotoxicity from scorpion stings. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2090-2098.
- Theakston RD, Warrell DA, Griffiths E. Report of a WHO workshop on the standardization and control of antivenoms. Toxicon. 2003;41:541-557.
- Müller GJ, Modler H, Wium CA, et al. Scorpion sting in southern Africa: diagnosis and management. Continuing Medical Education. 2012;30:356-361.
- Müller GJ. Scorpionism in South Africa. a report of 42 serious scorpion envenomations. S Afr Med J. 1993;83:405-411.
- Quintero-Hernández V, Jiménez-Vargas JM, Gurrola GB, et al. Scorpion venom components that affect ion-channels function. Toxicon. 2013;76:328-342.
- LoVecchio F, McBride C. Scorpion envenomations in young children in central Arizona. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2003;41:937-940.
- Chippaux JP, Goyffon M. Epidemiology of scorpionism: a global appraisal. Acta Trop. 2008;107:71-79.
- Bergman NJ. Clinical description of Parabuthus transvaalicus scorpionism in Zimbabwe. Toxicon. 1997;35:759-771.
- Chippaux JP. Emerging options for the management of scorpion stings. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2012;6:165-173.
- Santos MS, Silva CG, Neto BS, et al. Clinical and epidemiological aspects of scorpionism in the world: a systematic review. Wilderness Environ Med. 2016;27:504-518.
- Amaral CF, Rezende NA. Both cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic factors are involved in the pathogenesis of pulmonary oedema after scorpion envenoming. Toxicon. 1997;35:997-998.
- Bergman NJ. Scorpion sting in Zimbabwe. S Afr Med J. 1997;87:163-167.
- Boyer LV, Theodorou AA, Berg RA, et al; Arizona Envenomation Investigators. antivenom for critically ill children with neurotoxicity from scorpion stings. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2090-2098.
- Theakston RD, Warrell DA, Griffiths E. Report of a WHO workshop on the standardization and control of antivenoms. Toxicon. 2003;41:541-557.
Practice Points
- Exotic and dangerous pets are becoming more popular. Scorpion stings cause potentially life-threatening neurotoxicity, with children particularly susceptible.
- Fattail scorpions are particularly dangerous and physicians should be aware that their stings may be encountered worldwide.
- Symptoms present 1 to 8 hours after envenomation, with severe cases showing hyperreflexia, clonus, difficulty swallowing, and respiratory distress. The sting site may be unimpressive.
What’s Eating You? Cat Flea (Ctenocephalides felis) Revisited
Fleas of the order Siphonaptera are insects that feed on the blood of a mammalian host. They have no wings but jump to near 150 times their body lengths to reach potential hosts.1 An epidemiologic survey performed in 2016 demonstrated that 96% of fleas in the United States are cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis).2 The bites often present as pruritic, nonfollicular-based, excoriated papules; papular urticaria; or vesiculobullous lesions distributed across the lower legs. Antihistamines and topical steroids may be helpful for symptomatic relief, but flea eradication is key.
Identification
Ctenocephalides fleas, including the common cat flea and the dog flea, have a characteristic pronotal comb that resembles a mane of hair (Figure 1) and genal comb that resembles a mustache. Compared to the dog flea (Ctenocephalides canis), cat fleas have a flatter head and fewer hair-bearing notches on the dorsal hind tibia (the dog flea has 8 notches and the cat flea has 6 notches)(Figure 2).
Flea Prevention and Eradication
Effective management of flea bites requires avoidance of infested areas and eradication of fleas from the home and pets. Home treatment should be performed by a qualified specialist and a veterinarian should treat the pet, but the dermatologist must be knowledgeable about treatment options. Flea pupae can lie dormant between floorboards for extended periods of time and hatch rapidly when new tenants enter a house or apartment. Insecticidal dusts and spray formulations frequently are used to treat infested homes. It also is important to reduce flea egg numbers by vacuuming carpets and areas where pets sleep.3 Rodents often introduce fleas to households and pets, so eliminating them from the area may play an important role in flea control. Consulting with a veterinarian is important, as treatment directed at pets is critical to control flea populations. Oral agents, including fluralaner, afoxolaner, sarolaner, and spinosad, can reduce flea populations on animals by as much as 99.3% after 7 days.4,5 Fast-acting pulicidal agents, such as the combination of dinotefuran and fipronil, demonstrate curative activity as soon as 3 hours after treatment, which also may prevent reinfestation for as long as 6 weeks after treatment.6
Vector-Borne Disease
Fleas living on animals in close contact with humans, such as cats and dogs, can transmit zoonotic pathogens. Around 12,000 outpatients and 500 inpatients are diagnosed with cat scratch disease, a form of bartonellosis, annually. Ctenocephalides felis transmits Bartonella henselae from cat-to-cat and often cat-to-human through infected flea feces, causing a primary inoculation lesion and lymphadenitis. Of 3011 primary care providers surveyed from 2014 to 2015, 37.2% had treated at least 1 patient with cat scratch disease, yet knowledge gaps remain regarding the proper treatment and preventative measures for the disease.7 Current recommendations for the treatment of lymphadenitis caused by B henselae include a 5-day course of oral azithromycin.8 The preferred dosing regimen in adults is 500 mg on day 1 and 250 mg on days 2 through 5. Pediatric patients weighing less than 45.5 kg should receive 10 mg/kg on day 1 and 5 mg/kg on days 2 through 5.8 Additionally, less than one-third of the primary care providers surveyed from 2014 to 2015 said they would discuss the importance of pet flea control with immunocompromised patients who own cats, despite evidence implicating fleas in disease transmission.7 Pet-directed topical therapy with agents such as selamectin prescribed by a qualified veterinarian can prevent transmission of B henselae in cats exposed to fleas infected with the bacteria,9 which supports the importance of patient education and flea control, especially in pets owned by immunocompromised patients. Patients who are immunocompromised are at increased risk for persistent or disseminated bartonellosis, including endocarditis, in addition to cat scratch disease. Although arriving at a diagnosis may be difficult, one study found that bartonellosis in 13 renal transplant recipients was best diagnosed using both serology and polymerase chain reaction via DNA extraction of tissue specimens.10 These findings may enhance diagnostic yield for similar patients when bartonellosis is suspected.
Flea-borne typhus is endemic to Texas and Southern California.11,12 Evidence suggests that the pathogenic bacteria, Rickettsia typhi and Rickettsia felis, also commonly infect fleas in the Great Plains area.13 Opossums carry R felis, and the fleas transmit murine or endemic typhus. A retrospective case series in Texas identified 11 cases of fatal flea-borne typhus from 1985 to 2015.11 More than half of the patients reported contact with animals or fleas prior to the illness. Patients with typhus may present with fever, nausea, vomiting, rash (macular, maculopapular, papular, petechial, or morbilliform), respiratory or neurologic symptoms, thrombocytopenia, and elevated hepatic liver enzymes. Unfortunately, there often is a notable delay in initiation of treatment with the appropriate class of antibiotics—tetracyclines—and such delays can prove fatal.11 The current recommendation for nonpregnant adults is oral doxycycline 100 mg twice daily continued 48 hours after the patient becomes afebrile or for 7 days, whichever therapy duration is longer.14 Because of the consequences of delayed treatment, it is important for clinicians to consider a diagnosis of vector-borne illness in a febrile patient with other associated gastrointestinal, cutaneous, respiratory, or neurologic symptoms, especially if they have animal or flea exposures. Flea control and exposure awareness remains paramount in preventing and treating this illness.
Yersinia pestis causes the plague, an important re-emerging disease that causes infection through flea bites, inhalation, or ingestion.15 From 2000 to 2009, 56 cases and 7 deaths in the United States—New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, California, and Texas—and 21,725 cases and 1612 deaths worldwide were attributed to Y pestis. Most patients present with the bubonic form of the disease, with fever and an enlarging painful femoral or inguinal lymph node due to leg flea bites.16 Other forms of disease, including septicemic and pneumonic plague, are less common but relevant, as one-third of cases in the United States present with septicemia.15,17,18 Although molecular diagnosis and immunohistochemistry play important roles, the diagnosis of Y pestis infection often is still accomplished with culture. A 2012 survey of 392 strains from 17 countries demonstrated that Y pestis remained susceptible to the antibiotics currently used to treat the disease, including doxycycline, streptomycin, gentamicin, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and ciprofloxacin.19
Human infection with Dipylidium caninum, a dog tapeworm, has been reported after suspected accidental ingestion of cat fleas carrying the parasite.20 Children, who may present with diarrhea or white worms in their feces, are more susceptible to the infection, perhaps due to accidental flea consumption while being licked by the pet.20,21
Conclusion
Cat fleas may act as a pruritic nuisance for pet owners and even deliver deadly pathogens to immunocompromised patients. Providers can minimize their impact by educating patients on flea prevention and eradication as well as astutely recognizing and treating flea-borne diseases.
- Cadiergues MC. A comparison of jump performances of the dog flea, Ctenocephalides canis (Curtis, 1826) and the cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis (Bouché, 1835). Vet Parasitol. 2000;92:239-241.
- Blagburn B, Butler J, Land T, et al. Who’s who and where: prevalence of Ctenocephalides felis and Ctenocephalides canis in shelter dogs and cats in the United States. Presented at: American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists 61st Annual Meeting; August 6-9, 2016; San Antonio, TX. P9.
- Bitam I, Dittmar K, Parola P, et al. Fleas and flea-borne diseases. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:E667-E676.
- Dryden MW, Canfield MS, Niedfeldt E, et al. Evaluation of sarolaner and spinosad oral treatments to eliminate fleas, reduce dermatologic lesions and minimize pruritus in naturally infested dogs in west Central Florida, USA. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:389.
- Dryden MW, Canfield MS, Kalosy K, et al. Evaluation of fluralaner and afoxolaner treatments to control flea populations, reduce pruritus and minimize dermatologic lesions in naturally infested dogs in private residences in west Central Florida, USA. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:365.
- Delcombel R, Karembe H, Nare B, et al. Synergy between dinotefuran and fipronil against the cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis): improved onset of action and residual speed of kill in adult cats. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:341.
- Nelson CA, Moore AR, Perea AE, et al. Cat scratch disease: U.S. clinicians’ experience and knowledge. Zoonoses Public Health. 2018;65:67-73.
- Spach DH, Kaplan SL. Treatment of cat scratch disease. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-of-cat-scratch-disease?search=treatment%20of%20cat%20scratch&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~59&usage_type=default&display_rank=1.Updated June 12, 2019. Accessed August 15, 2019.
- Bouhsira E, Franc M, Lienard E, et al. The efficacy of a selamectin (Stronghold®) spot on treatment in the prevention of Bartonella henselae transmission by Ctenocephalides felis in cats, using a new high-challenge model. Parasitol Res. 2015;114:1045-1050.
- Shamekhi Amiri F. Bartonellosis in chronic kidney disease: an unrecognized and unsuspected diagnosis. Ther Apher Dial. 2017;21:430-440.
- Pieracci EG, Evert N, Drexler NA, et al. Fatal flea-borne typhus in Texas: a retrospective case series, 1985-2015. American J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;96:1088-1093.
- Maina AN, Fogarty C, Krueger L, et al. Rickettsial infections among Ctenocephalides felis and host animals during a flea-borne rickettsioses outbreak in Orange County, California. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0160604.
- Noden BH, Davidson S, Smith JL, et al. First detection of Rickettsia typhi and Rickettsia felis in fleas collected from client-owned companion animals in the Southern Great Plains. J Med Entomol. 2017;54:1093-1097.
- Sexton DJ. Murine typhus. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/murine-typhus?search=diagnosis-and-treatment-of-murine-typhus&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~21&usage_type=default&display_rank=1. Updated January 17, 2019. Accessed August 15, 2019.
- Riehm JM, Löscher T. Human plague and pneumonic plague: pathogenicity, epidemiology, clinical presentations and therapy [in German]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015;58:721-729.
- Butler T. Plague gives surprises in the first decade of the 21st century in the United States and worldwide. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;89:788-793.
- Gould LH, Pape J, Ettestad P, Griffith KS, et al. Dog-associated risk factors for human plague. Zoonoses Public Health. 2008;55:448-454.
- Margolis DA, Burns J, Reed SL, et al. Septicemic plague in a community hospital in California. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;78:868-871.
- Urich SK, Chalcraft L, Schriefer ME, et al. Lack of antimicrobial resistance in Yersinia pestis isolates from 17 countries in the Americas, Africa, and Asia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:555-558.
- Jiang P, Zhang X, Liu RD, et al. A human case of zoonotic dog tapeworm, Dipylidium caninum (Eucestoda: Dilepidiidae), in China. Korean J Parasitol. 2017;55:61-64.
- Roberts LS, Janovy J Jr, eds. Foundations of Parasitology. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2009.
Fleas of the order Siphonaptera are insects that feed on the blood of a mammalian host. They have no wings but jump to near 150 times their body lengths to reach potential hosts.1 An epidemiologic survey performed in 2016 demonstrated that 96% of fleas in the United States are cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis).2 The bites often present as pruritic, nonfollicular-based, excoriated papules; papular urticaria; or vesiculobullous lesions distributed across the lower legs. Antihistamines and topical steroids may be helpful for symptomatic relief, but flea eradication is key.
Identification
Ctenocephalides fleas, including the common cat flea and the dog flea, have a characteristic pronotal comb that resembles a mane of hair (Figure 1) and genal comb that resembles a mustache. Compared to the dog flea (Ctenocephalides canis), cat fleas have a flatter head and fewer hair-bearing notches on the dorsal hind tibia (the dog flea has 8 notches and the cat flea has 6 notches)(Figure 2).
Flea Prevention and Eradication
Effective management of flea bites requires avoidance of infested areas and eradication of fleas from the home and pets. Home treatment should be performed by a qualified specialist and a veterinarian should treat the pet, but the dermatologist must be knowledgeable about treatment options. Flea pupae can lie dormant between floorboards for extended periods of time and hatch rapidly when new tenants enter a house or apartment. Insecticidal dusts and spray formulations frequently are used to treat infested homes. It also is important to reduce flea egg numbers by vacuuming carpets and areas where pets sleep.3 Rodents often introduce fleas to households and pets, so eliminating them from the area may play an important role in flea control. Consulting with a veterinarian is important, as treatment directed at pets is critical to control flea populations. Oral agents, including fluralaner, afoxolaner, sarolaner, and spinosad, can reduce flea populations on animals by as much as 99.3% after 7 days.4,5 Fast-acting pulicidal agents, such as the combination of dinotefuran and fipronil, demonstrate curative activity as soon as 3 hours after treatment, which also may prevent reinfestation for as long as 6 weeks after treatment.6
Vector-Borne Disease
Fleas living on animals in close contact with humans, such as cats and dogs, can transmit zoonotic pathogens. Around 12,000 outpatients and 500 inpatients are diagnosed with cat scratch disease, a form of bartonellosis, annually. Ctenocephalides felis transmits Bartonella henselae from cat-to-cat and often cat-to-human through infected flea feces, causing a primary inoculation lesion and lymphadenitis. Of 3011 primary care providers surveyed from 2014 to 2015, 37.2% had treated at least 1 patient with cat scratch disease, yet knowledge gaps remain regarding the proper treatment and preventative measures for the disease.7 Current recommendations for the treatment of lymphadenitis caused by B henselae include a 5-day course of oral azithromycin.8 The preferred dosing regimen in adults is 500 mg on day 1 and 250 mg on days 2 through 5. Pediatric patients weighing less than 45.5 kg should receive 10 mg/kg on day 1 and 5 mg/kg on days 2 through 5.8 Additionally, less than one-third of the primary care providers surveyed from 2014 to 2015 said they would discuss the importance of pet flea control with immunocompromised patients who own cats, despite evidence implicating fleas in disease transmission.7 Pet-directed topical therapy with agents such as selamectin prescribed by a qualified veterinarian can prevent transmission of B henselae in cats exposed to fleas infected with the bacteria,9 which supports the importance of patient education and flea control, especially in pets owned by immunocompromised patients. Patients who are immunocompromised are at increased risk for persistent or disseminated bartonellosis, including endocarditis, in addition to cat scratch disease. Although arriving at a diagnosis may be difficult, one study found that bartonellosis in 13 renal transplant recipients was best diagnosed using both serology and polymerase chain reaction via DNA extraction of tissue specimens.10 These findings may enhance diagnostic yield for similar patients when bartonellosis is suspected.
Flea-borne typhus is endemic to Texas and Southern California.11,12 Evidence suggests that the pathogenic bacteria, Rickettsia typhi and Rickettsia felis, also commonly infect fleas in the Great Plains area.13 Opossums carry R felis, and the fleas transmit murine or endemic typhus. A retrospective case series in Texas identified 11 cases of fatal flea-borne typhus from 1985 to 2015.11 More than half of the patients reported contact with animals or fleas prior to the illness. Patients with typhus may present with fever, nausea, vomiting, rash (macular, maculopapular, papular, petechial, or morbilliform), respiratory or neurologic symptoms, thrombocytopenia, and elevated hepatic liver enzymes. Unfortunately, there often is a notable delay in initiation of treatment with the appropriate class of antibiotics—tetracyclines—and such delays can prove fatal.11 The current recommendation for nonpregnant adults is oral doxycycline 100 mg twice daily continued 48 hours after the patient becomes afebrile or for 7 days, whichever therapy duration is longer.14 Because of the consequences of delayed treatment, it is important for clinicians to consider a diagnosis of vector-borne illness in a febrile patient with other associated gastrointestinal, cutaneous, respiratory, or neurologic symptoms, especially if they have animal or flea exposures. Flea control and exposure awareness remains paramount in preventing and treating this illness.
Yersinia pestis causes the plague, an important re-emerging disease that causes infection through flea bites, inhalation, or ingestion.15 From 2000 to 2009, 56 cases and 7 deaths in the United States—New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, California, and Texas—and 21,725 cases and 1612 deaths worldwide were attributed to Y pestis. Most patients present with the bubonic form of the disease, with fever and an enlarging painful femoral or inguinal lymph node due to leg flea bites.16 Other forms of disease, including septicemic and pneumonic plague, are less common but relevant, as one-third of cases in the United States present with septicemia.15,17,18 Although molecular diagnosis and immunohistochemistry play important roles, the diagnosis of Y pestis infection often is still accomplished with culture. A 2012 survey of 392 strains from 17 countries demonstrated that Y pestis remained susceptible to the antibiotics currently used to treat the disease, including doxycycline, streptomycin, gentamicin, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and ciprofloxacin.19
Human infection with Dipylidium caninum, a dog tapeworm, has been reported after suspected accidental ingestion of cat fleas carrying the parasite.20 Children, who may present with diarrhea or white worms in their feces, are more susceptible to the infection, perhaps due to accidental flea consumption while being licked by the pet.20,21
Conclusion
Cat fleas may act as a pruritic nuisance for pet owners and even deliver deadly pathogens to immunocompromised patients. Providers can minimize their impact by educating patients on flea prevention and eradication as well as astutely recognizing and treating flea-borne diseases.
Fleas of the order Siphonaptera are insects that feed on the blood of a mammalian host. They have no wings but jump to near 150 times their body lengths to reach potential hosts.1 An epidemiologic survey performed in 2016 demonstrated that 96% of fleas in the United States are cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis).2 The bites often present as pruritic, nonfollicular-based, excoriated papules; papular urticaria; or vesiculobullous lesions distributed across the lower legs. Antihistamines and topical steroids may be helpful for symptomatic relief, but flea eradication is key.
Identification
Ctenocephalides fleas, including the common cat flea and the dog flea, have a characteristic pronotal comb that resembles a mane of hair (Figure 1) and genal comb that resembles a mustache. Compared to the dog flea (Ctenocephalides canis), cat fleas have a flatter head and fewer hair-bearing notches on the dorsal hind tibia (the dog flea has 8 notches and the cat flea has 6 notches)(Figure 2).
Flea Prevention and Eradication
Effective management of flea bites requires avoidance of infested areas and eradication of fleas from the home and pets. Home treatment should be performed by a qualified specialist and a veterinarian should treat the pet, but the dermatologist must be knowledgeable about treatment options. Flea pupae can lie dormant between floorboards for extended periods of time and hatch rapidly when new tenants enter a house or apartment. Insecticidal dusts and spray formulations frequently are used to treat infested homes. It also is important to reduce flea egg numbers by vacuuming carpets and areas where pets sleep.3 Rodents often introduce fleas to households and pets, so eliminating them from the area may play an important role in flea control. Consulting with a veterinarian is important, as treatment directed at pets is critical to control flea populations. Oral agents, including fluralaner, afoxolaner, sarolaner, and spinosad, can reduce flea populations on animals by as much as 99.3% after 7 days.4,5 Fast-acting pulicidal agents, such as the combination of dinotefuran and fipronil, demonstrate curative activity as soon as 3 hours after treatment, which also may prevent reinfestation for as long as 6 weeks after treatment.6
Vector-Borne Disease
Fleas living on animals in close contact with humans, such as cats and dogs, can transmit zoonotic pathogens. Around 12,000 outpatients and 500 inpatients are diagnosed with cat scratch disease, a form of bartonellosis, annually. Ctenocephalides felis transmits Bartonella henselae from cat-to-cat and often cat-to-human through infected flea feces, causing a primary inoculation lesion and lymphadenitis. Of 3011 primary care providers surveyed from 2014 to 2015, 37.2% had treated at least 1 patient with cat scratch disease, yet knowledge gaps remain regarding the proper treatment and preventative measures for the disease.7 Current recommendations for the treatment of lymphadenitis caused by B henselae include a 5-day course of oral azithromycin.8 The preferred dosing regimen in adults is 500 mg on day 1 and 250 mg on days 2 through 5. Pediatric patients weighing less than 45.5 kg should receive 10 mg/kg on day 1 and 5 mg/kg on days 2 through 5.8 Additionally, less than one-third of the primary care providers surveyed from 2014 to 2015 said they would discuss the importance of pet flea control with immunocompromised patients who own cats, despite evidence implicating fleas in disease transmission.7 Pet-directed topical therapy with agents such as selamectin prescribed by a qualified veterinarian can prevent transmission of B henselae in cats exposed to fleas infected with the bacteria,9 which supports the importance of patient education and flea control, especially in pets owned by immunocompromised patients. Patients who are immunocompromised are at increased risk for persistent or disseminated bartonellosis, including endocarditis, in addition to cat scratch disease. Although arriving at a diagnosis may be difficult, one study found that bartonellosis in 13 renal transplant recipients was best diagnosed using both serology and polymerase chain reaction via DNA extraction of tissue specimens.10 These findings may enhance diagnostic yield for similar patients when bartonellosis is suspected.
Flea-borne typhus is endemic to Texas and Southern California.11,12 Evidence suggests that the pathogenic bacteria, Rickettsia typhi and Rickettsia felis, also commonly infect fleas in the Great Plains area.13 Opossums carry R felis, and the fleas transmit murine or endemic typhus. A retrospective case series in Texas identified 11 cases of fatal flea-borne typhus from 1985 to 2015.11 More than half of the patients reported contact with animals or fleas prior to the illness. Patients with typhus may present with fever, nausea, vomiting, rash (macular, maculopapular, papular, petechial, or morbilliform), respiratory or neurologic symptoms, thrombocytopenia, and elevated hepatic liver enzymes. Unfortunately, there often is a notable delay in initiation of treatment with the appropriate class of antibiotics—tetracyclines—and such delays can prove fatal.11 The current recommendation for nonpregnant adults is oral doxycycline 100 mg twice daily continued 48 hours after the patient becomes afebrile or for 7 days, whichever therapy duration is longer.14 Because of the consequences of delayed treatment, it is important for clinicians to consider a diagnosis of vector-borne illness in a febrile patient with other associated gastrointestinal, cutaneous, respiratory, or neurologic symptoms, especially if they have animal or flea exposures. Flea control and exposure awareness remains paramount in preventing and treating this illness.
Yersinia pestis causes the plague, an important re-emerging disease that causes infection through flea bites, inhalation, or ingestion.15 From 2000 to 2009, 56 cases and 7 deaths in the United States—New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, California, and Texas—and 21,725 cases and 1612 deaths worldwide were attributed to Y pestis. Most patients present with the bubonic form of the disease, with fever and an enlarging painful femoral or inguinal lymph node due to leg flea bites.16 Other forms of disease, including septicemic and pneumonic plague, are less common but relevant, as one-third of cases in the United States present with septicemia.15,17,18 Although molecular diagnosis and immunohistochemistry play important roles, the diagnosis of Y pestis infection often is still accomplished with culture. A 2012 survey of 392 strains from 17 countries demonstrated that Y pestis remained susceptible to the antibiotics currently used to treat the disease, including doxycycline, streptomycin, gentamicin, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and ciprofloxacin.19
Human infection with Dipylidium caninum, a dog tapeworm, has been reported after suspected accidental ingestion of cat fleas carrying the parasite.20 Children, who may present with diarrhea or white worms in their feces, are more susceptible to the infection, perhaps due to accidental flea consumption while being licked by the pet.20,21
Conclusion
Cat fleas may act as a pruritic nuisance for pet owners and even deliver deadly pathogens to immunocompromised patients. Providers can minimize their impact by educating patients on flea prevention and eradication as well as astutely recognizing and treating flea-borne diseases.
- Cadiergues MC. A comparison of jump performances of the dog flea, Ctenocephalides canis (Curtis, 1826) and the cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis (Bouché, 1835). Vet Parasitol. 2000;92:239-241.
- Blagburn B, Butler J, Land T, et al. Who’s who and where: prevalence of Ctenocephalides felis and Ctenocephalides canis in shelter dogs and cats in the United States. Presented at: American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists 61st Annual Meeting; August 6-9, 2016; San Antonio, TX. P9.
- Bitam I, Dittmar K, Parola P, et al. Fleas and flea-borne diseases. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:E667-E676.
- Dryden MW, Canfield MS, Niedfeldt E, et al. Evaluation of sarolaner and spinosad oral treatments to eliminate fleas, reduce dermatologic lesions and minimize pruritus in naturally infested dogs in west Central Florida, USA. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:389.
- Dryden MW, Canfield MS, Kalosy K, et al. Evaluation of fluralaner and afoxolaner treatments to control flea populations, reduce pruritus and minimize dermatologic lesions in naturally infested dogs in private residences in west Central Florida, USA. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:365.
- Delcombel R, Karembe H, Nare B, et al. Synergy between dinotefuran and fipronil against the cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis): improved onset of action and residual speed of kill in adult cats. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:341.
- Nelson CA, Moore AR, Perea AE, et al. Cat scratch disease: U.S. clinicians’ experience and knowledge. Zoonoses Public Health. 2018;65:67-73.
- Spach DH, Kaplan SL. Treatment of cat scratch disease. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-of-cat-scratch-disease?search=treatment%20of%20cat%20scratch&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~59&usage_type=default&display_rank=1.Updated June 12, 2019. Accessed August 15, 2019.
- Bouhsira E, Franc M, Lienard E, et al. The efficacy of a selamectin (Stronghold®) spot on treatment in the prevention of Bartonella henselae transmission by Ctenocephalides felis in cats, using a new high-challenge model. Parasitol Res. 2015;114:1045-1050.
- Shamekhi Amiri F. Bartonellosis in chronic kidney disease: an unrecognized and unsuspected diagnosis. Ther Apher Dial. 2017;21:430-440.
- Pieracci EG, Evert N, Drexler NA, et al. Fatal flea-borne typhus in Texas: a retrospective case series, 1985-2015. American J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;96:1088-1093.
- Maina AN, Fogarty C, Krueger L, et al. Rickettsial infections among Ctenocephalides felis and host animals during a flea-borne rickettsioses outbreak in Orange County, California. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0160604.
- Noden BH, Davidson S, Smith JL, et al. First detection of Rickettsia typhi and Rickettsia felis in fleas collected from client-owned companion animals in the Southern Great Plains. J Med Entomol. 2017;54:1093-1097.
- Sexton DJ. Murine typhus. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/murine-typhus?search=diagnosis-and-treatment-of-murine-typhus&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~21&usage_type=default&display_rank=1. Updated January 17, 2019. Accessed August 15, 2019.
- Riehm JM, Löscher T. Human plague and pneumonic plague: pathogenicity, epidemiology, clinical presentations and therapy [in German]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015;58:721-729.
- Butler T. Plague gives surprises in the first decade of the 21st century in the United States and worldwide. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;89:788-793.
- Gould LH, Pape J, Ettestad P, Griffith KS, et al. Dog-associated risk factors for human plague. Zoonoses Public Health. 2008;55:448-454.
- Margolis DA, Burns J, Reed SL, et al. Septicemic plague in a community hospital in California. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;78:868-871.
- Urich SK, Chalcraft L, Schriefer ME, et al. Lack of antimicrobial resistance in Yersinia pestis isolates from 17 countries in the Americas, Africa, and Asia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:555-558.
- Jiang P, Zhang X, Liu RD, et al. A human case of zoonotic dog tapeworm, Dipylidium caninum (Eucestoda: Dilepidiidae), in China. Korean J Parasitol. 2017;55:61-64.
- Roberts LS, Janovy J Jr, eds. Foundations of Parasitology. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2009.
- Cadiergues MC. A comparison of jump performances of the dog flea, Ctenocephalides canis (Curtis, 1826) and the cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis (Bouché, 1835). Vet Parasitol. 2000;92:239-241.
- Blagburn B, Butler J, Land T, et al. Who’s who and where: prevalence of Ctenocephalides felis and Ctenocephalides canis in shelter dogs and cats in the United States. Presented at: American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists 61st Annual Meeting; August 6-9, 2016; San Antonio, TX. P9.
- Bitam I, Dittmar K, Parola P, et al. Fleas and flea-borne diseases. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:E667-E676.
- Dryden MW, Canfield MS, Niedfeldt E, et al. Evaluation of sarolaner and spinosad oral treatments to eliminate fleas, reduce dermatologic lesions and minimize pruritus in naturally infested dogs in west Central Florida, USA. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:389.
- Dryden MW, Canfield MS, Kalosy K, et al. Evaluation of fluralaner and afoxolaner treatments to control flea populations, reduce pruritus and minimize dermatologic lesions in naturally infested dogs in private residences in west Central Florida, USA. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:365.
- Delcombel R, Karembe H, Nare B, et al. Synergy between dinotefuran and fipronil against the cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis): improved onset of action and residual speed of kill in adult cats. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:341.
- Nelson CA, Moore AR, Perea AE, et al. Cat scratch disease: U.S. clinicians’ experience and knowledge. Zoonoses Public Health. 2018;65:67-73.
- Spach DH, Kaplan SL. Treatment of cat scratch disease. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-of-cat-scratch-disease?search=treatment%20of%20cat%20scratch&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~59&usage_type=default&display_rank=1.Updated June 12, 2019. Accessed August 15, 2019.
- Bouhsira E, Franc M, Lienard E, et al. The efficacy of a selamectin (Stronghold®) spot on treatment in the prevention of Bartonella henselae transmission by Ctenocephalides felis in cats, using a new high-challenge model. Parasitol Res. 2015;114:1045-1050.
- Shamekhi Amiri F. Bartonellosis in chronic kidney disease: an unrecognized and unsuspected diagnosis. Ther Apher Dial. 2017;21:430-440.
- Pieracci EG, Evert N, Drexler NA, et al. Fatal flea-borne typhus in Texas: a retrospective case series, 1985-2015. American J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;96:1088-1093.
- Maina AN, Fogarty C, Krueger L, et al. Rickettsial infections among Ctenocephalides felis and host animals during a flea-borne rickettsioses outbreak in Orange County, California. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0160604.
- Noden BH, Davidson S, Smith JL, et al. First detection of Rickettsia typhi and Rickettsia felis in fleas collected from client-owned companion animals in the Southern Great Plains. J Med Entomol. 2017;54:1093-1097.
- Sexton DJ. Murine typhus. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/murine-typhus?search=diagnosis-and-treatment-of-murine-typhus&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~21&usage_type=default&display_rank=1. Updated January 17, 2019. Accessed August 15, 2019.
- Riehm JM, Löscher T. Human plague and pneumonic plague: pathogenicity, epidemiology, clinical presentations and therapy [in German]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015;58:721-729.
- Butler T. Plague gives surprises in the first decade of the 21st century in the United States and worldwide. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;89:788-793.
- Gould LH, Pape J, Ettestad P, Griffith KS, et al. Dog-associated risk factors for human plague. Zoonoses Public Health. 2008;55:448-454.
- Margolis DA, Burns J, Reed SL, et al. Septicemic plague in a community hospital in California. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;78:868-871.
- Urich SK, Chalcraft L, Schriefer ME, et al. Lack of antimicrobial resistance in Yersinia pestis isolates from 17 countries in the Americas, Africa, and Asia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:555-558.
- Jiang P, Zhang X, Liu RD, et al. A human case of zoonotic dog tapeworm, Dipylidium caninum (Eucestoda: Dilepidiidae), in China. Korean J Parasitol. 2017;55:61-64.
- Roberts LS, Janovy J Jr, eds. Foundations of Parasitology. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2009.
Practice Points
- Cat fleas classically cause pruritic grouped papulovesicles on the lower legs of pet owners.
- Affected patients require thorough education on flea eradication.
- Cat fleas can transmit endemic typhus, cat scratch disease, and bubonic plague.
What’s Eating You? Millipede Burns
Clinical Presentation
Millipedes secrete a noxious toxin implicated in millipede burns. The toxic substance is benzoquinone, a strong irritant secreted from the repugnatorial glands contained in each segment of the arthropod (Figure 1). This compound serves as a natural insect repellant, acting as the millipede’s defense mechanism from potential predators.1 On human skin, benzoquinone causes localized pigmentary changes most commonly presenting on the feet and toes. Local lesions may be associated with pain or burning, but there are no known reports of adverse systemic effects.2 Affected patients experience cutaneous pigmentary changes, which may be dark red, blue, or black, and spontaneously resolve over time.2 The degree of pigment change may be associated with duration of skin contact with the toxin. The affected areas may resemble burns, dermatitis, or skin necrosis. More distal lesions may present similarly to blue toe syndrome or acute arterial occlusion but can be differentiated by the presence of intact peripheral pulses and lack of temperature discrepancy between the feet.3,4 Histologic evaluation of the lesions generally reveals nonspecific full-thickness epidermal necrosis, making clinical suspicion and physical examination paramount to the diagnosis of millipede burns.5
Diagnostic Difficulties
Accurate diagnosis of millipede burns is more difficult when the burn involves an unusual site. The most common site of involvement is the foot (Figure 2), followed by other commonly exposed areas such as the arms, face, and eyes.2,3,6,7 Covered parts of the body are much less commonly affected, requiring the arthropod to gain access via infiltration of clothing, often when hanging on a clothesline. In these cases, burns may be mistaken for child abuse, especially if certain areas of the body are involved, such as the groin and genitals.2 The well-defined arcuate lesions of the burns may resemble injuries from a wire or belt to the unsuspecting observer.
Conclusion
Although millipedes often are regarded as harmless, they are capable of causing adverse reactions through the secretion of toxic chemicals. Millipede burns cause localized pigmentary changes that may be associated with pain or burning in some patients. Because these burns may resemble child abuse in pediatric patients, physicians should be aware of this diagnosis when unusual parts of the body are involved.
- Kuwahara Y, Omura H, Tanabe T. 2-Nitroethenylbenzenes as naturalproducts in millipede defense secretions. Naturwissenschaften. 2002;89:308-310.
- De Capitani EM, Vieira RJ, Bucaretchi F, et al. Human accidents involving Rhinocricus spp., a common millipede genus observed in urban areas of Brazil. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2011;49:187-190.
- Heeren Neto AS, Bernardes Filho F, Martins G. Skin lesions simulating blue toe syndrome caused by prolonged contact with a millipede. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2014;47:257-258.
- Lima CA, Cardoso JL, Magela A, et al. Exogenous pigmentation in toes feigning ischemia of the extremities: a diagnostic challenge brought by arthropods of the Diplopoda class (“millipedes”). An Bras Dermatol. 2010;85:391-392.
- Dar NR, Raza N, Rehman SB. Millipede burn at an unusual site mimicking child abuse in an 8-year-old girl. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2008;47:490-492.
- Hendrickson RG. Millipede exposure. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2005;43:211-212.
- Verma AK, Bourke B. Millipede burn masquerading as trash foot in a paediatric patient [published online October 29, 2013]. ANZ J Surg. 2014;84:388-390.
Clinical Presentation
Millipedes secrete a noxious toxin implicated in millipede burns. The toxic substance is benzoquinone, a strong irritant secreted from the repugnatorial glands contained in each segment of the arthropod (Figure 1). This compound serves as a natural insect repellant, acting as the millipede’s defense mechanism from potential predators.1 On human skin, benzoquinone causes localized pigmentary changes most commonly presenting on the feet and toes. Local lesions may be associated with pain or burning, but there are no known reports of adverse systemic effects.2 Affected patients experience cutaneous pigmentary changes, which may be dark red, blue, or black, and spontaneously resolve over time.2 The degree of pigment change may be associated with duration of skin contact with the toxin. The affected areas may resemble burns, dermatitis, or skin necrosis. More distal lesions may present similarly to blue toe syndrome or acute arterial occlusion but can be differentiated by the presence of intact peripheral pulses and lack of temperature discrepancy between the feet.3,4 Histologic evaluation of the lesions generally reveals nonspecific full-thickness epidermal necrosis, making clinical suspicion and physical examination paramount to the diagnosis of millipede burns.5
Diagnostic Difficulties
Accurate diagnosis of millipede burns is more difficult when the burn involves an unusual site. The most common site of involvement is the foot (Figure 2), followed by other commonly exposed areas such as the arms, face, and eyes.2,3,6,7 Covered parts of the body are much less commonly affected, requiring the arthropod to gain access via infiltration of clothing, often when hanging on a clothesline. In these cases, burns may be mistaken for child abuse, especially if certain areas of the body are involved, such as the groin and genitals.2 The well-defined arcuate lesions of the burns may resemble injuries from a wire or belt to the unsuspecting observer.
Conclusion
Although millipedes often are regarded as harmless, they are capable of causing adverse reactions through the secretion of toxic chemicals. Millipede burns cause localized pigmentary changes that may be associated with pain or burning in some patients. Because these burns may resemble child abuse in pediatric patients, physicians should be aware of this diagnosis when unusual parts of the body are involved.
Clinical Presentation
Millipedes secrete a noxious toxin implicated in millipede burns. The toxic substance is benzoquinone, a strong irritant secreted from the repugnatorial glands contained in each segment of the arthropod (Figure 1). This compound serves as a natural insect repellant, acting as the millipede’s defense mechanism from potential predators.1 On human skin, benzoquinone causes localized pigmentary changes most commonly presenting on the feet and toes. Local lesions may be associated with pain or burning, but there are no known reports of adverse systemic effects.2 Affected patients experience cutaneous pigmentary changes, which may be dark red, blue, or black, and spontaneously resolve over time.2 The degree of pigment change may be associated with duration of skin contact with the toxin. The affected areas may resemble burns, dermatitis, or skin necrosis. More distal lesions may present similarly to blue toe syndrome or acute arterial occlusion but can be differentiated by the presence of intact peripheral pulses and lack of temperature discrepancy between the feet.3,4 Histologic evaluation of the lesions generally reveals nonspecific full-thickness epidermal necrosis, making clinical suspicion and physical examination paramount to the diagnosis of millipede burns.5
Diagnostic Difficulties
Accurate diagnosis of millipede burns is more difficult when the burn involves an unusual site. The most common site of involvement is the foot (Figure 2), followed by other commonly exposed areas such as the arms, face, and eyes.2,3,6,7 Covered parts of the body are much less commonly affected, requiring the arthropod to gain access via infiltration of clothing, often when hanging on a clothesline. In these cases, burns may be mistaken for child abuse, especially if certain areas of the body are involved, such as the groin and genitals.2 The well-defined arcuate lesions of the burns may resemble injuries from a wire or belt to the unsuspecting observer.
Conclusion
Although millipedes often are regarded as harmless, they are capable of causing adverse reactions through the secretion of toxic chemicals. Millipede burns cause localized pigmentary changes that may be associated with pain or burning in some patients. Because these burns may resemble child abuse in pediatric patients, physicians should be aware of this diagnosis when unusual parts of the body are involved.
- Kuwahara Y, Omura H, Tanabe T. 2-Nitroethenylbenzenes as naturalproducts in millipede defense secretions. Naturwissenschaften. 2002;89:308-310.
- De Capitani EM, Vieira RJ, Bucaretchi F, et al. Human accidents involving Rhinocricus spp., a common millipede genus observed in urban areas of Brazil. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2011;49:187-190.
- Heeren Neto AS, Bernardes Filho F, Martins G. Skin lesions simulating blue toe syndrome caused by prolonged contact with a millipede. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2014;47:257-258.
- Lima CA, Cardoso JL, Magela A, et al. Exogenous pigmentation in toes feigning ischemia of the extremities: a diagnostic challenge brought by arthropods of the Diplopoda class (“millipedes”). An Bras Dermatol. 2010;85:391-392.
- Dar NR, Raza N, Rehman SB. Millipede burn at an unusual site mimicking child abuse in an 8-year-old girl. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2008;47:490-492.
- Hendrickson RG. Millipede exposure. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2005;43:211-212.
- Verma AK, Bourke B. Millipede burn masquerading as trash foot in a paediatric patient [published online October 29, 2013]. ANZ J Surg. 2014;84:388-390.
- Kuwahara Y, Omura H, Tanabe T. 2-Nitroethenylbenzenes as naturalproducts in millipede defense secretions. Naturwissenschaften. 2002;89:308-310.
- De Capitani EM, Vieira RJ, Bucaretchi F, et al. Human accidents involving Rhinocricus spp., a common millipede genus observed in urban areas of Brazil. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2011;49:187-190.
- Heeren Neto AS, Bernardes Filho F, Martins G. Skin lesions simulating blue toe syndrome caused by prolonged contact with a millipede. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2014;47:257-258.
- Lima CA, Cardoso JL, Magela A, et al. Exogenous pigmentation in toes feigning ischemia of the extremities: a diagnostic challenge brought by arthropods of the Diplopoda class (“millipedes”). An Bras Dermatol. 2010;85:391-392.
- Dar NR, Raza N, Rehman SB. Millipede burn at an unusual site mimicking child abuse in an 8-year-old girl. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2008;47:490-492.
- Hendrickson RG. Millipede exposure. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2005;43:211-212.
- Verma AK, Bourke B. Millipede burn masquerading as trash foot in a paediatric patient [published online October 29, 2013]. ANZ J Surg. 2014;84:388-390.
Practice Points
- The most common site of involvement of millipede burns is the foot, followed by other commonly exposed areas such as the arms, face, and eyes. Covered parts of the body are much less commonly affected.
- Millipede burns may resemble child abuse in pediatric patients; therefore, physicians should be aware of this diagnosis when unusual parts of the body are involved.
Aquatic Antagonists: Stingray Injury Update
Incidence and Characteristics
Stingrays are dorsoventrally flattened, diamond-shaped fish with light-colored ventral and dark-colored dorsal surfaces. They have strong pectoral wings that allow them to swim forward and backward and even launch off waves.3 Stingrays range in size from the palm of a human hand to 6.5 ft in width. They possess 1 or more spines (2.5 to >30 cm in length) that are disguised by much longer tails.6,7 They often are encountered accidentally because they bury themselves in the sand or mud of shallow coastal waters or rivers with only their eyes and tails exposed to fool prey and avoid predators.
Injury Clinical Presentation
Stingray injuries typically involve the lower legs, ankles, or feet after stepping on a stingray.8 Fishermen can present with injuries of the upper extremities after handling fish with their hands.9 Other rarer injuries occur when individuals are swimming alongside stingrays or when stingrays catapult off waves into moving boats.10,11 Stingrays impale victims by using their tails to direct a retroserrate barb composed of a strong cartilaginous material called vasodentin. The barb releases venom by breaking through the venom-containing integumentary sheath that encapsulates it. Stingray venom contains phosphodiesterase, serotonin, and 5′-nucleotidase. It causes severe pain, vasoconstriction, ischemia, and poor wound healing, along with systemic effects such as disorientation, syncope, seizures, salivation, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, muscle cramps or fasciculations, pruritus, allergic reaction, hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, dyspnea, paralysis, and possibly death.1,8,12,13
Management
Pain Relief
As with many marine envenomations, immersion in hot but not scalding water can inactivate venom and reduce symptoms.8,9 In one retrospective review, 52 of 75 (69%) patients reporting to a California poison center with stingray injuries had improvement in pain within 1 hour of hot water immersion before any analgesics were instituted.8 In another review, 65 of 74 (88%) patients presenting to a California emergency department within 24 hours of sustaining a stingray injury had complete relief of pain within 30 minutes of hot water immersion. Patients who received analgesics in addition to hot water immersion did not require a second dose.9 In concordance with these studies, we suggest immersing areas affected by stingray injuries in hot water (temperature, 43.3°C to 46.1°C [110°F–115°F]; or as close to this range as tolerated) until pain subsides.8,9,14 Ice packs are an alternative to hot water immersion that may be more readily available to patients. If pain does not resolve following hot water immersion or application of an ice pack, additional analgesics and xylocaine without epinephrine may be helpful.9,15
Infection
One major complication of stingray injuries is infection.8,9 Many bacterial species reside in stingray mucus, the marine environment, or on human skin that may be introduced during a single injury. Marine envenomations can involve organisms such as Vibrio, Aeromonas, and Mycobacterium species, which often are resistant to antibiotic prophylaxis covering common causes of soft-tissue infection such as Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species.8,9,16,17 Additionally, physicians should cover for Clostridium species and ensure patients are up-to-date on vaccinations because severe cases of tetanus following stingray injuries have been reported.18 Lastly, fungal infections including fusariosis have been reported following stingray injuries and should be considered if a patient develops an infection.19
Several authors support the use of prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics in all but mild stingray injuries.8,9,20,21 Although no standardized definition exists, mild injuries generally represent patients with superficial lacerations or less, while deeper lacerations and puncture wounds require prophylaxis. Several authors agree on the use of fluoroquinolone antibiotics (eg, ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily) for 5 to 7 days following severe stingray injuries.1,9,13,22 Other proposed antibiotic regimens include trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (160/800 mg twice daily) or tetracycline (500 mg 4 times daily) for 7 days.13 Failure of ciprofloxacin therapy after 7 days has been reported, with resolution of infection after treatment with an intravenous cephalosporin for 7 days.20 Failure of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole therapy also has been reported, with one case requiring levofloxacin for a much longer course.21 Clinical follow-up remains essential after prescribing prophylactic antibiotics, as resistance is common.
Foreign Bodies
Stingray injuries also are often complicated by foreign bodies or retained spines.3,8 Although these complications are less severe than infection, all wounds should be explored for material under local anesthesia. Furthermore, there has been support for thorough debridement of necrotic tissue with referral to a hand specialist for deeper injuries to the hands as well as referral to a foot and ankle specialist for deeper injuries of the lower extremities.23,24 More serious injuries with penetration of vital structures, such as through the chest or abdomen, require immediate exploration in an operating room.1,24
Imaging
Routine imaging of stingray injuries remains controversial. In a case series of 119 patients presenting to a California emergency department with stingray injuries, Clark et al9 found that radiographs were not helpful. This finding likely is due in part to an inability to detect hypodense material such as integumentary or glandular tissue via radiography.3 However, radiographs have been used to identify retained stingray barbs in select cases in which retained barbs are suspected.2,25 Lastly, ultrasonography potentially may offer a better first choice when a barb is not readily apparent; magnetic resonance imaging may be indicated for more involved areas and for further visualization of suspected hypodense material, though at a higher expense.2,9
Biopsy
Biopsies of stingray injuries are rarely performed, and the findings are not well characterized. One case biopsied 2 months after injury showed a large zone of paucicellular necrosis with superficial ulceration and granulomatous inflammation. The stingray venom was most likely responsible for the pattern of necrosis noted in the biopsy.21
Avoidance and Prevention
Patients traveling to areas of the world inhabited by stingrays should receive counseling on how to avoid injury. Prior to entry, individuals can throw stones or use a long stick to clear their walking or swimming areas of venomous fish.26 Polarized sunglasses may help spot stingrays in shallow water. Furthermore, wading through water with a shuffling gait can help individuals avoid stepping directly on a stingray and also warns stingrays that someone is in the area. Individuals who spend more time in coastal waters or river systems inhabited by stingrays may invest in protective stingray gear such as leg guards or specialized wading boots.26 Lastly, fishermen should be advised to avoid handling stingrays with their hands and instead cut their fishing line to release the fish.
- Aurbach PS. Envenomations by aquatic vertebrates. In: Auerbach PS. Wilderness Medicine. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2007:1730-1749.
- Robins CR, Ray GC. A Field Guide to Atlantic Coast Fishes. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1986.
- Diaz JH. The evaluation, management, and prevention of stingray injuries in travelers. J Travel Med. 2008;15:102-109.
- Haddad V Jr, Neto DG, de Paula Neto JB, et al. Freshwater stingrays: study of epidemiologic, clinical and therapeutic aspects based on 84 envenomings in humans and some enzymatic activities of the venom. Toxicon. 2004;43:287-294.
- Marinkelle CJ. Accidents by venomous animals in Colombia. Ind Med Surg. 1966;35:988-992.
- Last PR, White WT, Caire JN, et al. Sharks and Rays of Borneo. Collingwood VIC, Australia: CSIRO Publishing; 2010.
- Mebs D. Venomous and Poisonous Animals: A Handbook for Biologists, Toxicologists and Toxinologists, Physicians and Pharmacists. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2002.
- Clark AT, Clark RF, Cantrell FL. A retrospective review of the presentation and treatment of stingray stings reported to a poison control system. Am J Ther. 2017;24:E177-E180.
- Clark RF, Girard RH, Rao D, et al. Stingray envenomation: a retrospective review of clinical presentation and treatment in 119 cases. J Emerg Med. 2007;33:33-37.
- Mahjoubi L, Joyeux A, Delambre JF, et al. Near-death thoracic trauma caused by a stingray in the Indian Ocean. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29:262-263.
- Parra MW, Constantini EN, Rodas EB. Surviving a transfixing cardiac injury caused by a stingray barb. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:E115-E116.
- Dos Santos JC, Grund LZ, Seibert CS, et al. Stingray venom activates IL-33 producing cardiomyocytes, but not mast cell, to promote acute neutrophil-mediated injury. Sci Rep. 2017;7:7912.
- Auerbach PS, Norris RL. Marine envenomation. In: Longo DL, Kasper SL, Jameson JL, et al, eds. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 18th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2012:144-148.
- Cook MD, Matteucci MJ, Lall R, et al. Stingray envenomation. J Emerg Med. 2006;30:345-347.
- Bowers RC, Mustain MV. Disorders due to physical & environmental agents. In: Humphries RL, Stone C, eds. CURRENT Diagnosis & Treatment Emergency Medicine. 7th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2011:835-861.
- Domingos MO, Franzolin MR, dos Anjos MT, et al. The influence of environmental bacteria in freshwater stingray wound-healing. Toxicon. 2011;58:147-153.
- Auerbach PS, Yajko DM, Nassos PS, et al. Bacteriology of the marine environment: implications for clinical therapy. Ann Emerg Med. 1987;16:643-649.
- Torrez PP, Quiroga MM, Said R, et al. Tetanus after envenomations caused by freshwater stingrays. Toxicon. 2015;97:32-35.
- Hiemenz JW, Kennedy B, Kwon-Chung KJ. Invasive fusariosis associated with an injury by a stingray barb. J Med Vet Mycol. 1990;28:209-213.
- da Silva NJ Jr, Ferreira KR, Pinto RN, et al. A severe accident caused by an ocellate river stingray (Potamotrygon motoro) in central Brazil: how well do we really understand stingray venom chemistry, envenomation, and therapeutics? Toxins (Basel). 2015;7:2272-2288.
- Tartar D, Limova M, North J. Clinical and histopathologic findings in cutaneous sting ray wounds: a case report. Dermatol Online J. 2013;19:19261.
- Jarvis HC, Matheny LM, Clanton TO. Stingray injury to the webspace of the foot. Orthopedics. 2012;35:E762-E765.
- Trickett R, Whitaker IS, Boyce DE. Sting-ray injuries to the hand: case report, literature review and a suggested algorithm for management. J Plast Reconstruct Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:E270-E273.
- Fernandez I, Valladolid G, Varon J, et al. Encounters with venomous sea-life. J Emerg Med. 2011;40:103-112.
- O’Malley GF, O’Malley RN, Pham O, et al. Retained stingray barb and the importance of imaging. Wilderness Environ Med. 2015;26:375-379.
- How to protect yourself from stingrays. Howcast website. https://www.howcast.com/videos/228034-how-to-protect-yourself-from-stingrays/. Accessed July 12, 2018.
Incidence and Characteristics
Stingrays are dorsoventrally flattened, diamond-shaped fish with light-colored ventral and dark-colored dorsal surfaces. They have strong pectoral wings that allow them to swim forward and backward and even launch off waves.3 Stingrays range in size from the palm of a human hand to 6.5 ft in width. They possess 1 or more spines (2.5 to >30 cm in length) that are disguised by much longer tails.6,7 They often are encountered accidentally because they bury themselves in the sand or mud of shallow coastal waters or rivers with only their eyes and tails exposed to fool prey and avoid predators.
Injury Clinical Presentation
Stingray injuries typically involve the lower legs, ankles, or feet after stepping on a stingray.8 Fishermen can present with injuries of the upper extremities after handling fish with their hands.9 Other rarer injuries occur when individuals are swimming alongside stingrays or when stingrays catapult off waves into moving boats.10,11 Stingrays impale victims by using their tails to direct a retroserrate barb composed of a strong cartilaginous material called vasodentin. The barb releases venom by breaking through the venom-containing integumentary sheath that encapsulates it. Stingray venom contains phosphodiesterase, serotonin, and 5′-nucleotidase. It causes severe pain, vasoconstriction, ischemia, and poor wound healing, along with systemic effects such as disorientation, syncope, seizures, salivation, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, muscle cramps or fasciculations, pruritus, allergic reaction, hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, dyspnea, paralysis, and possibly death.1,8,12,13
Management
Pain Relief
As with many marine envenomations, immersion in hot but not scalding water can inactivate venom and reduce symptoms.8,9 In one retrospective review, 52 of 75 (69%) patients reporting to a California poison center with stingray injuries had improvement in pain within 1 hour of hot water immersion before any analgesics were instituted.8 In another review, 65 of 74 (88%) patients presenting to a California emergency department within 24 hours of sustaining a stingray injury had complete relief of pain within 30 minutes of hot water immersion. Patients who received analgesics in addition to hot water immersion did not require a second dose.9 In concordance with these studies, we suggest immersing areas affected by stingray injuries in hot water (temperature, 43.3°C to 46.1°C [110°F–115°F]; or as close to this range as tolerated) until pain subsides.8,9,14 Ice packs are an alternative to hot water immersion that may be more readily available to patients. If pain does not resolve following hot water immersion or application of an ice pack, additional analgesics and xylocaine without epinephrine may be helpful.9,15
Infection
One major complication of stingray injuries is infection.8,9 Many bacterial species reside in stingray mucus, the marine environment, or on human skin that may be introduced during a single injury. Marine envenomations can involve organisms such as Vibrio, Aeromonas, and Mycobacterium species, which often are resistant to antibiotic prophylaxis covering common causes of soft-tissue infection such as Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species.8,9,16,17 Additionally, physicians should cover for Clostridium species and ensure patients are up-to-date on vaccinations because severe cases of tetanus following stingray injuries have been reported.18 Lastly, fungal infections including fusariosis have been reported following stingray injuries and should be considered if a patient develops an infection.19
Several authors support the use of prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics in all but mild stingray injuries.8,9,20,21 Although no standardized definition exists, mild injuries generally represent patients with superficial lacerations or less, while deeper lacerations and puncture wounds require prophylaxis. Several authors agree on the use of fluoroquinolone antibiotics (eg, ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily) for 5 to 7 days following severe stingray injuries.1,9,13,22 Other proposed antibiotic regimens include trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (160/800 mg twice daily) or tetracycline (500 mg 4 times daily) for 7 days.13 Failure of ciprofloxacin therapy after 7 days has been reported, with resolution of infection after treatment with an intravenous cephalosporin for 7 days.20 Failure of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole therapy also has been reported, with one case requiring levofloxacin for a much longer course.21 Clinical follow-up remains essential after prescribing prophylactic antibiotics, as resistance is common.
Foreign Bodies
Stingray injuries also are often complicated by foreign bodies or retained spines.3,8 Although these complications are less severe than infection, all wounds should be explored for material under local anesthesia. Furthermore, there has been support for thorough debridement of necrotic tissue with referral to a hand specialist for deeper injuries to the hands as well as referral to a foot and ankle specialist for deeper injuries of the lower extremities.23,24 More serious injuries with penetration of vital structures, such as through the chest or abdomen, require immediate exploration in an operating room.1,24
Imaging
Routine imaging of stingray injuries remains controversial. In a case series of 119 patients presenting to a California emergency department with stingray injuries, Clark et al9 found that radiographs were not helpful. This finding likely is due in part to an inability to detect hypodense material such as integumentary or glandular tissue via radiography.3 However, radiographs have been used to identify retained stingray barbs in select cases in which retained barbs are suspected.2,25 Lastly, ultrasonography potentially may offer a better first choice when a barb is not readily apparent; magnetic resonance imaging may be indicated for more involved areas and for further visualization of suspected hypodense material, though at a higher expense.2,9
Biopsy
Biopsies of stingray injuries are rarely performed, and the findings are not well characterized. One case biopsied 2 months after injury showed a large zone of paucicellular necrosis with superficial ulceration and granulomatous inflammation. The stingray venom was most likely responsible for the pattern of necrosis noted in the biopsy.21
Avoidance and Prevention
Patients traveling to areas of the world inhabited by stingrays should receive counseling on how to avoid injury. Prior to entry, individuals can throw stones or use a long stick to clear their walking or swimming areas of venomous fish.26 Polarized sunglasses may help spot stingrays in shallow water. Furthermore, wading through water with a shuffling gait can help individuals avoid stepping directly on a stingray and also warns stingrays that someone is in the area. Individuals who spend more time in coastal waters or river systems inhabited by stingrays may invest in protective stingray gear such as leg guards or specialized wading boots.26 Lastly, fishermen should be advised to avoid handling stingrays with their hands and instead cut their fishing line to release the fish.
Incidence and Characteristics
Stingrays are dorsoventrally flattened, diamond-shaped fish with light-colored ventral and dark-colored dorsal surfaces. They have strong pectoral wings that allow them to swim forward and backward and even launch off waves.3 Stingrays range in size from the palm of a human hand to 6.5 ft in width. They possess 1 or more spines (2.5 to >30 cm in length) that are disguised by much longer tails.6,7 They often are encountered accidentally because they bury themselves in the sand or mud of shallow coastal waters or rivers with only their eyes and tails exposed to fool prey and avoid predators.
Injury Clinical Presentation
Stingray injuries typically involve the lower legs, ankles, or feet after stepping on a stingray.8 Fishermen can present with injuries of the upper extremities after handling fish with their hands.9 Other rarer injuries occur when individuals are swimming alongside stingrays or when stingrays catapult off waves into moving boats.10,11 Stingrays impale victims by using their tails to direct a retroserrate barb composed of a strong cartilaginous material called vasodentin. The barb releases venom by breaking through the venom-containing integumentary sheath that encapsulates it. Stingray venom contains phosphodiesterase, serotonin, and 5′-nucleotidase. It causes severe pain, vasoconstriction, ischemia, and poor wound healing, along with systemic effects such as disorientation, syncope, seizures, salivation, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, muscle cramps or fasciculations, pruritus, allergic reaction, hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, dyspnea, paralysis, and possibly death.1,8,12,13
Management
Pain Relief
As with many marine envenomations, immersion in hot but not scalding water can inactivate venom and reduce symptoms.8,9 In one retrospective review, 52 of 75 (69%) patients reporting to a California poison center with stingray injuries had improvement in pain within 1 hour of hot water immersion before any analgesics were instituted.8 In another review, 65 of 74 (88%) patients presenting to a California emergency department within 24 hours of sustaining a stingray injury had complete relief of pain within 30 minutes of hot water immersion. Patients who received analgesics in addition to hot water immersion did not require a second dose.9 In concordance with these studies, we suggest immersing areas affected by stingray injuries in hot water (temperature, 43.3°C to 46.1°C [110°F–115°F]; or as close to this range as tolerated) until pain subsides.8,9,14 Ice packs are an alternative to hot water immersion that may be more readily available to patients. If pain does not resolve following hot water immersion or application of an ice pack, additional analgesics and xylocaine without epinephrine may be helpful.9,15
Infection
One major complication of stingray injuries is infection.8,9 Many bacterial species reside in stingray mucus, the marine environment, or on human skin that may be introduced during a single injury. Marine envenomations can involve organisms such as Vibrio, Aeromonas, and Mycobacterium species, which often are resistant to antibiotic prophylaxis covering common causes of soft-tissue infection such as Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species.8,9,16,17 Additionally, physicians should cover for Clostridium species and ensure patients are up-to-date on vaccinations because severe cases of tetanus following stingray injuries have been reported.18 Lastly, fungal infections including fusariosis have been reported following stingray injuries and should be considered if a patient develops an infection.19
Several authors support the use of prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics in all but mild stingray injuries.8,9,20,21 Although no standardized definition exists, mild injuries generally represent patients with superficial lacerations or less, while deeper lacerations and puncture wounds require prophylaxis. Several authors agree on the use of fluoroquinolone antibiotics (eg, ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily) for 5 to 7 days following severe stingray injuries.1,9,13,22 Other proposed antibiotic regimens include trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (160/800 mg twice daily) or tetracycline (500 mg 4 times daily) for 7 days.13 Failure of ciprofloxacin therapy after 7 days has been reported, with resolution of infection after treatment with an intravenous cephalosporin for 7 days.20 Failure of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole therapy also has been reported, with one case requiring levofloxacin for a much longer course.21 Clinical follow-up remains essential after prescribing prophylactic antibiotics, as resistance is common.
Foreign Bodies
Stingray injuries also are often complicated by foreign bodies or retained spines.3,8 Although these complications are less severe than infection, all wounds should be explored for material under local anesthesia. Furthermore, there has been support for thorough debridement of necrotic tissue with referral to a hand specialist for deeper injuries to the hands as well as referral to a foot and ankle specialist for deeper injuries of the lower extremities.23,24 More serious injuries with penetration of vital structures, such as through the chest or abdomen, require immediate exploration in an operating room.1,24
Imaging
Routine imaging of stingray injuries remains controversial. In a case series of 119 patients presenting to a California emergency department with stingray injuries, Clark et al9 found that radiographs were not helpful. This finding likely is due in part to an inability to detect hypodense material such as integumentary or glandular tissue via radiography.3 However, radiographs have been used to identify retained stingray barbs in select cases in which retained barbs are suspected.2,25 Lastly, ultrasonography potentially may offer a better first choice when a barb is not readily apparent; magnetic resonance imaging may be indicated for more involved areas and for further visualization of suspected hypodense material, though at a higher expense.2,9
Biopsy
Biopsies of stingray injuries are rarely performed, and the findings are not well characterized. One case biopsied 2 months after injury showed a large zone of paucicellular necrosis with superficial ulceration and granulomatous inflammation. The stingray venom was most likely responsible for the pattern of necrosis noted in the biopsy.21
Avoidance and Prevention
Patients traveling to areas of the world inhabited by stingrays should receive counseling on how to avoid injury. Prior to entry, individuals can throw stones or use a long stick to clear their walking or swimming areas of venomous fish.26 Polarized sunglasses may help spot stingrays in shallow water. Furthermore, wading through water with a shuffling gait can help individuals avoid stepping directly on a stingray and also warns stingrays that someone is in the area. Individuals who spend more time in coastal waters or river systems inhabited by stingrays may invest in protective stingray gear such as leg guards or specialized wading boots.26 Lastly, fishermen should be advised to avoid handling stingrays with their hands and instead cut their fishing line to release the fish.
- Aurbach PS. Envenomations by aquatic vertebrates. In: Auerbach PS. Wilderness Medicine. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2007:1730-1749.
- Robins CR, Ray GC. A Field Guide to Atlantic Coast Fishes. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1986.
- Diaz JH. The evaluation, management, and prevention of stingray injuries in travelers. J Travel Med. 2008;15:102-109.
- Haddad V Jr, Neto DG, de Paula Neto JB, et al. Freshwater stingrays: study of epidemiologic, clinical and therapeutic aspects based on 84 envenomings in humans and some enzymatic activities of the venom. Toxicon. 2004;43:287-294.
- Marinkelle CJ. Accidents by venomous animals in Colombia. Ind Med Surg. 1966;35:988-992.
- Last PR, White WT, Caire JN, et al. Sharks and Rays of Borneo. Collingwood VIC, Australia: CSIRO Publishing; 2010.
- Mebs D. Venomous and Poisonous Animals: A Handbook for Biologists, Toxicologists and Toxinologists, Physicians and Pharmacists. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2002.
- Clark AT, Clark RF, Cantrell FL. A retrospective review of the presentation and treatment of stingray stings reported to a poison control system. Am J Ther. 2017;24:E177-E180.
- Clark RF, Girard RH, Rao D, et al. Stingray envenomation: a retrospective review of clinical presentation and treatment in 119 cases. J Emerg Med. 2007;33:33-37.
- Mahjoubi L, Joyeux A, Delambre JF, et al. Near-death thoracic trauma caused by a stingray in the Indian Ocean. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29:262-263.
- Parra MW, Constantini EN, Rodas EB. Surviving a transfixing cardiac injury caused by a stingray barb. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:E115-E116.
- Dos Santos JC, Grund LZ, Seibert CS, et al. Stingray venom activates IL-33 producing cardiomyocytes, but not mast cell, to promote acute neutrophil-mediated injury. Sci Rep. 2017;7:7912.
- Auerbach PS, Norris RL. Marine envenomation. In: Longo DL, Kasper SL, Jameson JL, et al, eds. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 18th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2012:144-148.
- Cook MD, Matteucci MJ, Lall R, et al. Stingray envenomation. J Emerg Med. 2006;30:345-347.
- Bowers RC, Mustain MV. Disorders due to physical & environmental agents. In: Humphries RL, Stone C, eds. CURRENT Diagnosis & Treatment Emergency Medicine. 7th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2011:835-861.
- Domingos MO, Franzolin MR, dos Anjos MT, et al. The influence of environmental bacteria in freshwater stingray wound-healing. Toxicon. 2011;58:147-153.
- Auerbach PS, Yajko DM, Nassos PS, et al. Bacteriology of the marine environment: implications for clinical therapy. Ann Emerg Med. 1987;16:643-649.
- Torrez PP, Quiroga MM, Said R, et al. Tetanus after envenomations caused by freshwater stingrays. Toxicon. 2015;97:32-35.
- Hiemenz JW, Kennedy B, Kwon-Chung KJ. Invasive fusariosis associated with an injury by a stingray barb. J Med Vet Mycol. 1990;28:209-213.
- da Silva NJ Jr, Ferreira KR, Pinto RN, et al. A severe accident caused by an ocellate river stingray (Potamotrygon motoro) in central Brazil: how well do we really understand stingray venom chemistry, envenomation, and therapeutics? Toxins (Basel). 2015;7:2272-2288.
- Tartar D, Limova M, North J. Clinical and histopathologic findings in cutaneous sting ray wounds: a case report. Dermatol Online J. 2013;19:19261.
- Jarvis HC, Matheny LM, Clanton TO. Stingray injury to the webspace of the foot. Orthopedics. 2012;35:E762-E765.
- Trickett R, Whitaker IS, Boyce DE. Sting-ray injuries to the hand: case report, literature review and a suggested algorithm for management. J Plast Reconstruct Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:E270-E273.
- Fernandez I, Valladolid G, Varon J, et al. Encounters with venomous sea-life. J Emerg Med. 2011;40:103-112.
- O’Malley GF, O’Malley RN, Pham O, et al. Retained stingray barb and the importance of imaging. Wilderness Environ Med. 2015;26:375-379.
- How to protect yourself from stingrays. Howcast website. https://www.howcast.com/videos/228034-how-to-protect-yourself-from-stingrays/. Accessed July 12, 2018.
- Aurbach PS. Envenomations by aquatic vertebrates. In: Auerbach PS. Wilderness Medicine. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2007:1730-1749.
- Robins CR, Ray GC. A Field Guide to Atlantic Coast Fishes. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1986.
- Diaz JH. The evaluation, management, and prevention of stingray injuries in travelers. J Travel Med. 2008;15:102-109.
- Haddad V Jr, Neto DG, de Paula Neto JB, et al. Freshwater stingrays: study of epidemiologic, clinical and therapeutic aspects based on 84 envenomings in humans and some enzymatic activities of the venom. Toxicon. 2004;43:287-294.
- Marinkelle CJ. Accidents by venomous animals in Colombia. Ind Med Surg. 1966;35:988-992.
- Last PR, White WT, Caire JN, et al. Sharks and Rays of Borneo. Collingwood VIC, Australia: CSIRO Publishing; 2010.
- Mebs D. Venomous and Poisonous Animals: A Handbook for Biologists, Toxicologists and Toxinologists, Physicians and Pharmacists. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2002.
- Clark AT, Clark RF, Cantrell FL. A retrospective review of the presentation and treatment of stingray stings reported to a poison control system. Am J Ther. 2017;24:E177-E180.
- Clark RF, Girard RH, Rao D, et al. Stingray envenomation: a retrospective review of clinical presentation and treatment in 119 cases. J Emerg Med. 2007;33:33-37.
- Mahjoubi L, Joyeux A, Delambre JF, et al. Near-death thoracic trauma caused by a stingray in the Indian Ocean. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29:262-263.
- Parra MW, Constantini EN, Rodas EB. Surviving a transfixing cardiac injury caused by a stingray barb. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:E115-E116.
- Dos Santos JC, Grund LZ, Seibert CS, et al. Stingray venom activates IL-33 producing cardiomyocytes, but not mast cell, to promote acute neutrophil-mediated injury. Sci Rep. 2017;7:7912.
- Auerbach PS, Norris RL. Marine envenomation. In: Longo DL, Kasper SL, Jameson JL, et al, eds. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 18th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2012:144-148.
- Cook MD, Matteucci MJ, Lall R, et al. Stingray envenomation. J Emerg Med. 2006;30:345-347.
- Bowers RC, Mustain MV. Disorders due to physical & environmental agents. In: Humphries RL, Stone C, eds. CURRENT Diagnosis & Treatment Emergency Medicine. 7th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2011:835-861.
- Domingos MO, Franzolin MR, dos Anjos MT, et al. The influence of environmental bacteria in freshwater stingray wound-healing. Toxicon. 2011;58:147-153.
- Auerbach PS, Yajko DM, Nassos PS, et al. Bacteriology of the marine environment: implications for clinical therapy. Ann Emerg Med. 1987;16:643-649.
- Torrez PP, Quiroga MM, Said R, et al. Tetanus after envenomations caused by freshwater stingrays. Toxicon. 2015;97:32-35.
- Hiemenz JW, Kennedy B, Kwon-Chung KJ. Invasive fusariosis associated with an injury by a stingray barb. J Med Vet Mycol. 1990;28:209-213.
- da Silva NJ Jr, Ferreira KR, Pinto RN, et al. A severe accident caused by an ocellate river stingray (Potamotrygon motoro) in central Brazil: how well do we really understand stingray venom chemistry, envenomation, and therapeutics? Toxins (Basel). 2015;7:2272-2288.
- Tartar D, Limova M, North J. Clinical and histopathologic findings in cutaneous sting ray wounds: a case report. Dermatol Online J. 2013;19:19261.
- Jarvis HC, Matheny LM, Clanton TO. Stingray injury to the webspace of the foot. Orthopedics. 2012;35:E762-E765.
- Trickett R, Whitaker IS, Boyce DE. Sting-ray injuries to the hand: case report, literature review and a suggested algorithm for management. J Plast Reconstruct Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:E270-E273.
- Fernandez I, Valladolid G, Varon J, et al. Encounters with venomous sea-life. J Emerg Med. 2011;40:103-112.
- O’Malley GF, O’Malley RN, Pham O, et al. Retained stingray barb and the importance of imaging. Wilderness Environ Med. 2015;26:375-379.
- How to protect yourself from stingrays. Howcast website. https://www.howcast.com/videos/228034-how-to-protect-yourself-from-stingrays/. Accessed July 12, 2018.
Practice Points
- Acute pain associated with stingray injuries can be treated with hot water immersion.
- Stingray injuries are prone to secondary infection and poor wound healing.
What’s Eating You? Bedbugs
Bedbugs are common pests causing several health and economic consequences. With increased travel, pesticide resistance, and a lack of awareness about prevention, bedbugs have become even more difficult to control, especially within large population centers.1 The US Environmental Protection Agency considers bedbugs to be a considerable public health issue.2 Typically, they are found in private residences; however, there have been more reports of bedbugs discovered in the workplace within the last 20 years.3-5 Herein, we present a case of bedbugs presenting in this unusual environment.
Case Report
A 42-year-old man presented to our dermatology clinic with intensely itchy bumps over the bilateral posterior arms of 3 months’ duration. He had no other skin, hair, or nail concerns. Over the last 3 months prior to dermatologic evaluation, he was treated by an outside physician with topical steroids, systemic antibiotics, topical antifungals, and even systemic steroids with no improvement of the lesions or symptoms. On clinical examination at the current presentation, 8 to 10 pink dermal papules coalescing into 10-cm round patches were noted on the bilateral posterior arms (Figure 1). A punch biopsy of the posterior right arm was performed, and histologic analysis showed a dense superficial and deep infiltrate and a perivascular infiltrate of lymphocytes and eosinophils (Figure 2). No notable epidermal changes were observed.
At this time, the patient was counseled that the most likely cause was some unknown arthropod exposure. Given the chronicity of the patient’s disease course, bedbugs were favored; however, an extensive search of the patient’s home failed to uncover any arthropods, let alone bedbugs. A few weeks later, the patient discovered insects emanating from the mesh backing of his office chair while at work (Figure 3). The location of the intruders corresponded exactly with the lesions on the posterior arms. The occupational health office at his workplace collected samples of the arthropods and confirmed they were bedbugs. The patient’s lesions resolved with topical clobetasol once eradication of the workplace was complete.
Discussion
Morphology and Epidemiology
Bedbugs are wingless arthropods that have flat, oval-shaped, reddish brown bodies. They are approximately 4.5-mm long and 2.5-mm wide (Figure 4). The 2 most common species of bedbugs that infect humans are Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus. Bedbugs are most commonly found in hotels, apartments, and residential households near sleep locations. They reside in crevices, cracks, mattresses, cushions, dressers, and other structures proximal to the bed. During the day they remain hidden, but at night they emerge for a blood meal. The average lifespan of a bedbug is 6 to 12 months.6 Females lay more than 200 eggs that hatch in approximately 6 to 10 days.7 Bedbugs progress through 5 nymph stages before becoming adults; several blood meals are required to advance each stage.6
Although commonly attributed to the home, bedbugs are being increasingly seen in the office setting.3-5 In a survey given to pest management professionals in 2015, more than 45% reported that they were contracted by corporations for bedbug infestations in office settings, an increase from 18% in 2010 and 36% in 2013.3 Bedbugs are brought into offices through clothing, luggage, books, and other personal items. Unable to find hosts at night, bedbugs adapt to daytime hours and spread to more unpredictable locations, including chairs, office equipment, desks, and computers.4 Additionally, they frequently move around to find a suitable host.5 As a result, the growth rate of bedbugs in an office setting is much slower than in the home, with fewer insects. Our patient did not have bedbugs at home, but it is possible that other employees transported them to the office over time.
Clinical Manifestations
Bedbugs cause pruritic and nonpruritic skin rashes, often of the arms, legs, neck, and face. A common reaction is an erythematous papule with a hemorrhagic punctum caused by one bite.8 Other presentations include purpuric macules, bullae, and papular urticaria.8-10 Although bedbugs are suspected to transmit infectious diseases, no reports have substantiated that claim.11
Our patient had several coalescing dermal papules on the arms indicating multiple bites around the same area. Due to the stationary aspect of his job—with the arms resting on his chair while typing at his desk—our patient was an easy target for consistent blood meals.
Detection
Due to an overall smaller population of insects in an office setting, detection of bedbugs in the workplace can be difficult. Infestations can be primarily identified on visual inspection by pest control.12 The mesh backing on our patient’s chair was one site where bedbugs resided. It is important to check areas where employees congregate, such as lounges, lunch areas, conference rooms, and printers.4 It also is essential to examine coatracks and locker rooms, as employees may leave personal items that can serve as a source of transmission of the bugs from home. Additional detection tools provided by pest management professionals include canines, as well as devices that emit pheromones, carbon dioxide, or heat to ensnare the insects.12
Treatment
Treatment of bedbug bites is quite variable. For some patients, lesions may resolve on their own. Pruritic maculopapular eruptions can be treated with topical pramoxine or doxepin.8 Patients who develop allergic urticaria can use oral antihistamines. Systemic reactions such as anaphylaxis can be treated with a combination of intramuscular epinephrine, antihistamines, and corticosteroids.8 The etiology of our patient’s condition initially was unknown, and thus he was given unnecessary systemic steroids and antifungals until the source of the rash was identified and eradicated. Topical clobetasol was subsequently administered and was sufficient to resolve his symptoms.
Final Thoughts
Bedbugs continue to remain a nuisance in the home. This case provides an example of bedbugs in the office, a location that is not commonly associated with bedbug infestations. Bedbugs pose numerous psychological, economic, and health consequences.2 Productivity can be reduced, as patients with symptomatic lesions will be unable to work effectively, and those who are unaffected may be unwilling to work knowing their office environment poses a health risk. In addition, employees may worry about bringing the bedbugs home. It is important that employees be educated on the signs of a bedbug infestation and take preventive measures to stop spreading or introducing them to the office space. Due to the scattered habitation of bedbugs in offices, pest control managers need to be vigilant to identify sources of infestation and eradicate accordingly. Clinical manifestations can be nonspecific, resembling autoimmune disorders, fungal infections, or bites from other various arthropods; thus, treatment is highly dependent on the patient’s history and occupational exposure.
Bedbugs have successfully adapted to a new environment in the office space. Dermatologists and other health care professionals can no longer exclusively associate bedbugs with the home. When the clinical and histological presentation suggests an arthropod assault, we must counsel our patients to surveil their homes and work settings alike. If necessary, they should seek the assistance of occupational health professionals.
1. Ralph N, Jones HE, Thorpe LE. Self-reported bed bug infestation among New York City residents: prevalence and risk factors. J Environ Health; 2013;76:38-45.
2. US Environmental Protection Agency. Bed Bugs are public health pests. EPA website. https://www.epa.gov/bedbugs/bed-bugs-are-public-health-pests. Accessed December 6, 2018.
3. Potter MF, Haynes KF, Fredericks J. Bed bugs across America: 2015 Bugs Without Borders survey. Pestworld. 2015:4-14. https://www.npmapestworld.org/default/assets/File/newsroom/magazine/2015/nov-dec_2015.pdf. Accessed December 6, 2018.
4. Pinto LJ, Cooper R, Kraft SK. Bed bugs in office buildings: the ultimate challenge? MGK website. http://giecdn.blob.core.windows.net/fileuploads/file/bedbugs-office-buildings.pdf. Accessed December 6, 2018.
5. Baumblatt JA, Dunn JR, Schaffner W, et al. An outbreak of bed bug infestation in an office building. J Environ Health. 2014;76:16-19.
6. Parasites: bed bugs. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. www.cdc.gov/parasites/bedbugs/biology.html. Updated March 17, 2015. Accessed September 21, 2018.
7. Bed bugs. University of Minnesota Extension website. https://www.extension.umn.edu/garden/insects/find/bed-bugs-in-residences. Accessed September 21, 2018.
8. Goddard J, deShazo R. Bed bugs (Cimex lectularius) and clinical consequences of their bites. JAMA. 2009;301:1358-1366.
9. Scarupa, MD, Economides A. Bedbug bites masquerading as urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:1508-1509.
10. Abdel-Naser MB, Lotfy RA, Al-Sherbiny MM, et al. Patients with papular urticaria have IgG antibodies to bedbug (Cimex lectularius) antigens. Parasitol Res. 2006;98:550-556.
11. Lai O, Ho D, Glick S, et al. Bed bugs and possible transmission of human pathogens: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol Res. 2016;308:531-538.
12. Vaidyanathan R, Feldlaufer MF. Bed bug detection: current technologies and future directions. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88:619-625.
Bedbugs are common pests causing several health and economic consequences. With increased travel, pesticide resistance, and a lack of awareness about prevention, bedbugs have become even more difficult to control, especially within large population centers.1 The US Environmental Protection Agency considers bedbugs to be a considerable public health issue.2 Typically, they are found in private residences; however, there have been more reports of bedbugs discovered in the workplace within the last 20 years.3-5 Herein, we present a case of bedbugs presenting in this unusual environment.
Case Report
A 42-year-old man presented to our dermatology clinic with intensely itchy bumps over the bilateral posterior arms of 3 months’ duration. He had no other skin, hair, or nail concerns. Over the last 3 months prior to dermatologic evaluation, he was treated by an outside physician with topical steroids, systemic antibiotics, topical antifungals, and even systemic steroids with no improvement of the lesions or symptoms. On clinical examination at the current presentation, 8 to 10 pink dermal papules coalescing into 10-cm round patches were noted on the bilateral posterior arms (Figure 1). A punch biopsy of the posterior right arm was performed, and histologic analysis showed a dense superficial and deep infiltrate and a perivascular infiltrate of lymphocytes and eosinophils (Figure 2). No notable epidermal changes were observed.
At this time, the patient was counseled that the most likely cause was some unknown arthropod exposure. Given the chronicity of the patient’s disease course, bedbugs were favored; however, an extensive search of the patient’s home failed to uncover any arthropods, let alone bedbugs. A few weeks later, the patient discovered insects emanating from the mesh backing of his office chair while at work (Figure 3). The location of the intruders corresponded exactly with the lesions on the posterior arms. The occupational health office at his workplace collected samples of the arthropods and confirmed they were bedbugs. The patient’s lesions resolved with topical clobetasol once eradication of the workplace was complete.
Discussion
Morphology and Epidemiology
Bedbugs are wingless arthropods that have flat, oval-shaped, reddish brown bodies. They are approximately 4.5-mm long and 2.5-mm wide (Figure 4). The 2 most common species of bedbugs that infect humans are Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus. Bedbugs are most commonly found in hotels, apartments, and residential households near sleep locations. They reside in crevices, cracks, mattresses, cushions, dressers, and other structures proximal to the bed. During the day they remain hidden, but at night they emerge for a blood meal. The average lifespan of a bedbug is 6 to 12 months.6 Females lay more than 200 eggs that hatch in approximately 6 to 10 days.7 Bedbugs progress through 5 nymph stages before becoming adults; several blood meals are required to advance each stage.6
Although commonly attributed to the home, bedbugs are being increasingly seen in the office setting.3-5 In a survey given to pest management professionals in 2015, more than 45% reported that they were contracted by corporations for bedbug infestations in office settings, an increase from 18% in 2010 and 36% in 2013.3 Bedbugs are brought into offices through clothing, luggage, books, and other personal items. Unable to find hosts at night, bedbugs adapt to daytime hours and spread to more unpredictable locations, including chairs, office equipment, desks, and computers.4 Additionally, they frequently move around to find a suitable host.5 As a result, the growth rate of bedbugs in an office setting is much slower than in the home, with fewer insects. Our patient did not have bedbugs at home, but it is possible that other employees transported them to the office over time.
Clinical Manifestations
Bedbugs cause pruritic and nonpruritic skin rashes, often of the arms, legs, neck, and face. A common reaction is an erythematous papule with a hemorrhagic punctum caused by one bite.8 Other presentations include purpuric macules, bullae, and papular urticaria.8-10 Although bedbugs are suspected to transmit infectious diseases, no reports have substantiated that claim.11
Our patient had several coalescing dermal papules on the arms indicating multiple bites around the same area. Due to the stationary aspect of his job—with the arms resting on his chair while typing at his desk—our patient was an easy target for consistent blood meals.
Detection
Due to an overall smaller population of insects in an office setting, detection of bedbugs in the workplace can be difficult. Infestations can be primarily identified on visual inspection by pest control.12 The mesh backing on our patient’s chair was one site where bedbugs resided. It is important to check areas where employees congregate, such as lounges, lunch areas, conference rooms, and printers.4 It also is essential to examine coatracks and locker rooms, as employees may leave personal items that can serve as a source of transmission of the bugs from home. Additional detection tools provided by pest management professionals include canines, as well as devices that emit pheromones, carbon dioxide, or heat to ensnare the insects.12
Treatment
Treatment of bedbug bites is quite variable. For some patients, lesions may resolve on their own. Pruritic maculopapular eruptions can be treated with topical pramoxine or doxepin.8 Patients who develop allergic urticaria can use oral antihistamines. Systemic reactions such as anaphylaxis can be treated with a combination of intramuscular epinephrine, antihistamines, and corticosteroids.8 The etiology of our patient’s condition initially was unknown, and thus he was given unnecessary systemic steroids and antifungals until the source of the rash was identified and eradicated. Topical clobetasol was subsequently administered and was sufficient to resolve his symptoms.
Final Thoughts
Bedbugs continue to remain a nuisance in the home. This case provides an example of bedbugs in the office, a location that is not commonly associated with bedbug infestations. Bedbugs pose numerous psychological, economic, and health consequences.2 Productivity can be reduced, as patients with symptomatic lesions will be unable to work effectively, and those who are unaffected may be unwilling to work knowing their office environment poses a health risk. In addition, employees may worry about bringing the bedbugs home. It is important that employees be educated on the signs of a bedbug infestation and take preventive measures to stop spreading or introducing them to the office space. Due to the scattered habitation of bedbugs in offices, pest control managers need to be vigilant to identify sources of infestation and eradicate accordingly. Clinical manifestations can be nonspecific, resembling autoimmune disorders, fungal infections, or bites from other various arthropods; thus, treatment is highly dependent on the patient’s history and occupational exposure.
Bedbugs have successfully adapted to a new environment in the office space. Dermatologists and other health care professionals can no longer exclusively associate bedbugs with the home. When the clinical and histological presentation suggests an arthropod assault, we must counsel our patients to surveil their homes and work settings alike. If necessary, they should seek the assistance of occupational health professionals.
Bedbugs are common pests causing several health and economic consequences. With increased travel, pesticide resistance, and a lack of awareness about prevention, bedbugs have become even more difficult to control, especially within large population centers.1 The US Environmental Protection Agency considers bedbugs to be a considerable public health issue.2 Typically, they are found in private residences; however, there have been more reports of bedbugs discovered in the workplace within the last 20 years.3-5 Herein, we present a case of bedbugs presenting in this unusual environment.
Case Report
A 42-year-old man presented to our dermatology clinic with intensely itchy bumps over the bilateral posterior arms of 3 months’ duration. He had no other skin, hair, or nail concerns. Over the last 3 months prior to dermatologic evaluation, he was treated by an outside physician with topical steroids, systemic antibiotics, topical antifungals, and even systemic steroids with no improvement of the lesions or symptoms. On clinical examination at the current presentation, 8 to 10 pink dermal papules coalescing into 10-cm round patches were noted on the bilateral posterior arms (Figure 1). A punch biopsy of the posterior right arm was performed, and histologic analysis showed a dense superficial and deep infiltrate and a perivascular infiltrate of lymphocytes and eosinophils (Figure 2). No notable epidermal changes were observed.
At this time, the patient was counseled that the most likely cause was some unknown arthropod exposure. Given the chronicity of the patient’s disease course, bedbugs were favored; however, an extensive search of the patient’s home failed to uncover any arthropods, let alone bedbugs. A few weeks later, the patient discovered insects emanating from the mesh backing of his office chair while at work (Figure 3). The location of the intruders corresponded exactly with the lesions on the posterior arms. The occupational health office at his workplace collected samples of the arthropods and confirmed they were bedbugs. The patient’s lesions resolved with topical clobetasol once eradication of the workplace was complete.
Discussion
Morphology and Epidemiology
Bedbugs are wingless arthropods that have flat, oval-shaped, reddish brown bodies. They are approximately 4.5-mm long and 2.5-mm wide (Figure 4). The 2 most common species of bedbugs that infect humans are Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus. Bedbugs are most commonly found in hotels, apartments, and residential households near sleep locations. They reside in crevices, cracks, mattresses, cushions, dressers, and other structures proximal to the bed. During the day they remain hidden, but at night they emerge for a blood meal. The average lifespan of a bedbug is 6 to 12 months.6 Females lay more than 200 eggs that hatch in approximately 6 to 10 days.7 Bedbugs progress through 5 nymph stages before becoming adults; several blood meals are required to advance each stage.6
Although commonly attributed to the home, bedbugs are being increasingly seen in the office setting.3-5 In a survey given to pest management professionals in 2015, more than 45% reported that they were contracted by corporations for bedbug infestations in office settings, an increase from 18% in 2010 and 36% in 2013.3 Bedbugs are brought into offices through clothing, luggage, books, and other personal items. Unable to find hosts at night, bedbugs adapt to daytime hours and spread to more unpredictable locations, including chairs, office equipment, desks, and computers.4 Additionally, they frequently move around to find a suitable host.5 As a result, the growth rate of bedbugs in an office setting is much slower than in the home, with fewer insects. Our patient did not have bedbugs at home, but it is possible that other employees transported them to the office over time.
Clinical Manifestations
Bedbugs cause pruritic and nonpruritic skin rashes, often of the arms, legs, neck, and face. A common reaction is an erythematous papule with a hemorrhagic punctum caused by one bite.8 Other presentations include purpuric macules, bullae, and papular urticaria.8-10 Although bedbugs are suspected to transmit infectious diseases, no reports have substantiated that claim.11
Our patient had several coalescing dermal papules on the arms indicating multiple bites around the same area. Due to the stationary aspect of his job—with the arms resting on his chair while typing at his desk—our patient was an easy target for consistent blood meals.
Detection
Due to an overall smaller population of insects in an office setting, detection of bedbugs in the workplace can be difficult. Infestations can be primarily identified on visual inspection by pest control.12 The mesh backing on our patient’s chair was one site where bedbugs resided. It is important to check areas where employees congregate, such as lounges, lunch areas, conference rooms, and printers.4 It also is essential to examine coatracks and locker rooms, as employees may leave personal items that can serve as a source of transmission of the bugs from home. Additional detection tools provided by pest management professionals include canines, as well as devices that emit pheromones, carbon dioxide, or heat to ensnare the insects.12
Treatment
Treatment of bedbug bites is quite variable. For some patients, lesions may resolve on their own. Pruritic maculopapular eruptions can be treated with topical pramoxine or doxepin.8 Patients who develop allergic urticaria can use oral antihistamines. Systemic reactions such as anaphylaxis can be treated with a combination of intramuscular epinephrine, antihistamines, and corticosteroids.8 The etiology of our patient’s condition initially was unknown, and thus he was given unnecessary systemic steroids and antifungals until the source of the rash was identified and eradicated. Topical clobetasol was subsequently administered and was sufficient to resolve his symptoms.
Final Thoughts
Bedbugs continue to remain a nuisance in the home. This case provides an example of bedbugs in the office, a location that is not commonly associated with bedbug infestations. Bedbugs pose numerous psychological, economic, and health consequences.2 Productivity can be reduced, as patients with symptomatic lesions will be unable to work effectively, and those who are unaffected may be unwilling to work knowing their office environment poses a health risk. In addition, employees may worry about bringing the bedbugs home. It is important that employees be educated on the signs of a bedbug infestation and take preventive measures to stop spreading or introducing them to the office space. Due to the scattered habitation of bedbugs in offices, pest control managers need to be vigilant to identify sources of infestation and eradicate accordingly. Clinical manifestations can be nonspecific, resembling autoimmune disorders, fungal infections, or bites from other various arthropods; thus, treatment is highly dependent on the patient’s history and occupational exposure.
Bedbugs have successfully adapted to a new environment in the office space. Dermatologists and other health care professionals can no longer exclusively associate bedbugs with the home. When the clinical and histological presentation suggests an arthropod assault, we must counsel our patients to surveil their homes and work settings alike. If necessary, they should seek the assistance of occupational health professionals.
1. Ralph N, Jones HE, Thorpe LE. Self-reported bed bug infestation among New York City residents: prevalence and risk factors. J Environ Health; 2013;76:38-45.
2. US Environmental Protection Agency. Bed Bugs are public health pests. EPA website. https://www.epa.gov/bedbugs/bed-bugs-are-public-health-pests. Accessed December 6, 2018.
3. Potter MF, Haynes KF, Fredericks J. Bed bugs across America: 2015 Bugs Without Borders survey. Pestworld. 2015:4-14. https://www.npmapestworld.org/default/assets/File/newsroom/magazine/2015/nov-dec_2015.pdf. Accessed December 6, 2018.
4. Pinto LJ, Cooper R, Kraft SK. Bed bugs in office buildings: the ultimate challenge? MGK website. http://giecdn.blob.core.windows.net/fileuploads/file/bedbugs-office-buildings.pdf. Accessed December 6, 2018.
5. Baumblatt JA, Dunn JR, Schaffner W, et al. An outbreak of bed bug infestation in an office building. J Environ Health. 2014;76:16-19.
6. Parasites: bed bugs. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. www.cdc.gov/parasites/bedbugs/biology.html. Updated March 17, 2015. Accessed September 21, 2018.
7. Bed bugs. University of Minnesota Extension website. https://www.extension.umn.edu/garden/insects/find/bed-bugs-in-residences. Accessed September 21, 2018.
8. Goddard J, deShazo R. Bed bugs (Cimex lectularius) and clinical consequences of their bites. JAMA. 2009;301:1358-1366.
9. Scarupa, MD, Economides A. Bedbug bites masquerading as urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:1508-1509.
10. Abdel-Naser MB, Lotfy RA, Al-Sherbiny MM, et al. Patients with papular urticaria have IgG antibodies to bedbug (Cimex lectularius) antigens. Parasitol Res. 2006;98:550-556.
11. Lai O, Ho D, Glick S, et al. Bed bugs and possible transmission of human pathogens: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol Res. 2016;308:531-538.
12. Vaidyanathan R, Feldlaufer MF. Bed bug detection: current technologies and future directions. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88:619-625.
1. Ralph N, Jones HE, Thorpe LE. Self-reported bed bug infestation among New York City residents: prevalence and risk factors. J Environ Health; 2013;76:38-45.
2. US Environmental Protection Agency. Bed Bugs are public health pests. EPA website. https://www.epa.gov/bedbugs/bed-bugs-are-public-health-pests. Accessed December 6, 2018.
3. Potter MF, Haynes KF, Fredericks J. Bed bugs across America: 2015 Bugs Without Borders survey. Pestworld. 2015:4-14. https://www.npmapestworld.org/default/assets/File/newsroom/magazine/2015/nov-dec_2015.pdf. Accessed December 6, 2018.
4. Pinto LJ, Cooper R, Kraft SK. Bed bugs in office buildings: the ultimate challenge? MGK website. http://giecdn.blob.core.windows.net/fileuploads/file/bedbugs-office-buildings.pdf. Accessed December 6, 2018.
5. Baumblatt JA, Dunn JR, Schaffner W, et al. An outbreak of bed bug infestation in an office building. J Environ Health. 2014;76:16-19.
6. Parasites: bed bugs. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. www.cdc.gov/parasites/bedbugs/biology.html. Updated March 17, 2015. Accessed September 21, 2018.
7. Bed bugs. University of Minnesota Extension website. https://www.extension.umn.edu/garden/insects/find/bed-bugs-in-residences. Accessed September 21, 2018.
8. Goddard J, deShazo R. Bed bugs (Cimex lectularius) and clinical consequences of their bites. JAMA. 2009;301:1358-1366.
9. Scarupa, MD, Economides A. Bedbug bites masquerading as urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:1508-1509.
10. Abdel-Naser MB, Lotfy RA, Al-Sherbiny MM, et al. Patients with papular urticaria have IgG antibodies to bedbug (Cimex lectularius) antigens. Parasitol Res. 2006;98:550-556.
11. Lai O, Ho D, Glick S, et al. Bed bugs and possible transmission of human pathogens: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol Res. 2016;308:531-538.
12. Vaidyanathan R, Feldlaufer MF. Bed bug detection: current technologies and future directions. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88:619-625.
Practice Points
- Bedbug exposures in the workplace are on the rise.
- High clinical suspicion is required when atypical dermatoses are not responding to therapy and histology suggests arthropod exposure.
- Once detected, partnership with occupational health and pest management experts is critical to eradicate bedbugs.
Aquatic Antagonists: Lionfish (Pterois volitans)
The lionfish (Pterois volitans) is a member of the Scorpaenidae family of venomous fish.1-3 Lionfish are an invasive species originally from the Indian and Pacific oceans and the Red Sea that now are widely found throughout tropical and temperate oceans in both hemispheres. They are a popular aquarium fish and were inadvertently introduced in the Atlantic Ocean in South Florida during the late 1980s to early 1990s.2,4 Since then, lionfish have spread into reef systems throughout the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea, and Gulf of Mexico in rapidly growing numbers, and they are now fo und all along the southeastern coast of the United States.5
Characteristics
Lionfish are brightly colored with red or maroon and white stripes, tentacles above the eyes and mouth, fan-shaped pectoral fins, and spines that deliver an especially painful venomous sting that often results in edema (Figure 1). They have 12 dorsal spines, 2 pelvic spines, and 3 anal spines.
Symptoms of Envenomation
As lionfish continue to spread to popular areas of the southeast Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea, the chances of human contact with lionfish have increased. Lionfish stings are now the second most common marine envenomation injury after those caused by stingrays.4 Lionfish stings usually occur on the hands, fingers, or forearms during handling of the fish in ocean waters or in maintenance of aquariums. The mechanism of the venom apparatus is similar for all venomous fish. The spines have surrounding integumentary sheaths containing venom that rupture and inject venom when they penetrate the skin.6 The venom is a heat-labile neuromuscular toxin that causes edema (Figure 2), plasma extravasation, and thrombotic skin lesions.7
Wounds are classified into 3 categories: grade I consists of local erythema/ecchymosis, grade II involves vesicle or blister formation, and grade III denotes wounds that develop local necrosis.8 The sting causes immediate and severe throbbing pain, often described as excruciating or rated 10/10 on a basic pain scale, typically radiating up the affected limb. Puncture sites may bleed and often have associated redness and swelling. Pain may last up to 24 hours. Occasionally, foreign material may be left in the wound requiring removal. There also is a chance of secondary infection at the wound site, and severe envenomation can lead to local tissue necrosis.8 Systemic effects can occur in some cases, including nausea, vomiting, sweating, headache, dizziness, disorientation, palpitations, and even syncope.9 However, to our knowledge there are no documented cases of human death from a lionfish sting. Anaphylactic reactions are possible and require immediate treatment.6
A study conducted in the French West Indies evaluated 117 patients with lionfish envenomation and found that victims experienced severe pain and local edema (100%), paresthesia (90%), abdominal cramps (62%), extensive edema (53%), tachycardia (34%), skin rash (32%), gastrointestinal tract symptoms (28%), syncope (27%), transient weakness (24%), hypertension (21%), hypotension (18%), and hyperthermia (9%).9 Complications included local infection (18%) such as skin abscess (5%), skin necrosis (3%), and septic arthritis (2%). Twenty-two percent of patients were hospitalized and 8% required surgery. Local infectious complications were more frequent in those with multiple stings (19%). The study concluded that lionfish now represent a major health threat in the West Indies.9 As lionfish numbers have grown, health care providers are seeing increasing numbers of envenomation cases in areas of the coastal southeastern United States and Caribbean associated with considerable morbidity. Providers in nonendemic areas also may see envenomation injuries due to the lionfish popularity in home aquariums.9
Management
Individuals with lionfish stings should immerse the affected area in hot but not scalding water. Those with more serious injuries should seek medical attention. Home remedies that are generally contraindicated include application of topical papain or meat tenderizer.10 Data on ice packs are mixed, but because the toxin is heat labile, the most effective initial step in treatment is immersion of the affected area in water (temperature, 40°C to 45°C) for 30 to 90 minutes.6 The hot water inactivates the heat-labile toxin, leading to near-complete symptomatic relief in 80% of cases and moderate relief in an additional 14%. Immersion time more than 90 minutes considerably increases the risk for burns. Children should always be monitored to prevent burns. If a patient has received a nerve block for analgesia, the wound should not be immersed in hot water to avoid burns to the skin. The wound should be meticulously cleaned with saline irrigation, and radiography or ultrasonography should be performed as deemed necessary to look for any retained foreign bodies.8 Patients may require parenteral or oral analgesia as well as careful follow-up to ensure proper healing.9 Systemic symptoms require supportive care. Venomous fish wounds typically are small and superficial. Empiric antibiotic therapy is not advised for superficial wounds but may be required for clinically infected wounds.8 Tetanus prophylaxis should be given as appropriate to all affected patients. It has been noted that blister fluid contains high concentrations of lionfish venom, and when present, it increases the likelihood of converting the injury from a grade II to grade III wound with tissue necrosis; therefore, blisters should be drained or excised to decrease the chances of subsequent tissue necrosis.11,12 If secondary infection such as cellulitis develops, antibiotics should be chosen to cover likely pathogens including common skin flora such as staphylococci and marine organisms such as Vibrio species. Wounds showing signs of infection should be cultured, with antibiotics adjusted according to sensitivities.5 Deeper wounds should be left open (unsutured) with a proper dressing to heal. Any wounds that involve vascular or joint structures require specialty management. Wounds involving joints may on occasion require surgical exploration and debridement.
Public Health Concerns
In an attempt to slow the growth of their population, human consumption of the fish has been encouraged. The lionfish toxin is inactivated by cooking, and the fish is considered a delicacy; however, a study in the Virgin Islands found that in areas with endemic ciguatera poisoning, 12% of lionfish carried amounts of the toxin above the level considered safe for consumption. This toxin is not inactivated by cooking or freezing and can lead to ciguatera fish poisoning for which there is no antidote and can be associated with prolonged neurotoxicity.13
Conclusion
As lionfish numbers continue to increase, physicians across multiple specialties and regions may see an increase in envenomation injuries. It is important that physicians are aware of how to recognize and treat lionfish stings, as prompt and comprehensive treatment provides benefit to the patient.
- Pterois volitans. Integrated Taxonomic Information System website. https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=166883#null. Accessed September 6, 2018.
- Morris JA Jr, Whitfield PE. Biology, Ecology, Control and Management of the Invasive Indopacific Lionfish: An Updated Integrated Assessment. Beaufort, NC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; 2009. http://aquaticcommons.org/2847/1/NCCOS_TM_99.pdf. Accessed September 6, 2018.
- Pterois volitans/miles. US Geological Survey website. https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?speciesID=963. Revised April 18, 2018. Accessed September 6, 2018.
- Diaz JH. Invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans) pose public health threats [published online August 15, 2015]. J La State Med Soc. 2015;167:166-171.
- Diaz JH. Marine Scorpaenidae envenomation in travelers: epidemiology, management, and prevention. J Travel Med. 2015;22:251-258.
- Hobday D, Chadha P, Din AH, et al. Denaturing the lionfish. Eplasty. 2016;16:ic20.
- Sáenz A, Ortiz N, Lomonte B, et al. Comparison of biochemical and cytotoxic activities of extracts obtained from dorsal spines and caudal fin of adult and juvenile non-native Caribbean lionfish (Pterois volitans/miles). Toxicon. 2017;137:158-167.
- Schult RF, Acquisto NM, Stair CK, et al. A case of lionfish envenomation presenting to an inland emergency department [published online August 13, 2017]. Case Rep Emerg Med. 2017;2017:5893563.
- Resiere D, Cerland L, De Haro L, et al. Envenomation by the invasive Pterois volitans species (lionfish) in the French West Indies—a two-year prospective study in Martinique. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2016;54:313-318.
- Auerbach PS. Envenomation by aquatic vertebrates. In: Auerback PS. Wilderness Medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier; 2007:1740-1741.
- Auerbach PS, McKinney HE, Rees RE, et al. Analysis of vesicle fluid following the sting of the lionfish, Pterois volitans. Toxicon. 1987;25:1350-1353.
- Patel MR, Wells S. Lionfish envenomation of the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1993;18:523-525.
- Robertson A, Garcia AC, Quintana HA, et al. Invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans): a potential human health threat for Ciguatera fish poisoning in tropical waters. Marine Drugs. 2014;12:88-97.
The lionfish (Pterois volitans) is a member of the Scorpaenidae family of venomous fish.1-3 Lionfish are an invasive species originally from the Indian and Pacific oceans and the Red Sea that now are widely found throughout tropical and temperate oceans in both hemispheres. They are a popular aquarium fish and were inadvertently introduced in the Atlantic Ocean in South Florida during the late 1980s to early 1990s.2,4 Since then, lionfish have spread into reef systems throughout the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea, and Gulf of Mexico in rapidly growing numbers, and they are now fo und all along the southeastern coast of the United States.5
Characteristics
Lionfish are brightly colored with red or maroon and white stripes, tentacles above the eyes and mouth, fan-shaped pectoral fins, and spines that deliver an especially painful venomous sting that often results in edema (Figure 1). They have 12 dorsal spines, 2 pelvic spines, and 3 anal spines.
Symptoms of Envenomation
As lionfish continue to spread to popular areas of the southeast Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea, the chances of human contact with lionfish have increased. Lionfish stings are now the second most common marine envenomation injury after those caused by stingrays.4 Lionfish stings usually occur on the hands, fingers, or forearms during handling of the fish in ocean waters or in maintenance of aquariums. The mechanism of the venom apparatus is similar for all venomous fish. The spines have surrounding integumentary sheaths containing venom that rupture and inject venom when they penetrate the skin.6 The venom is a heat-labile neuromuscular toxin that causes edema (Figure 2), plasma extravasation, and thrombotic skin lesions.7
Wounds are classified into 3 categories: grade I consists of local erythema/ecchymosis, grade II involves vesicle or blister formation, and grade III denotes wounds that develop local necrosis.8 The sting causes immediate and severe throbbing pain, often described as excruciating or rated 10/10 on a basic pain scale, typically radiating up the affected limb. Puncture sites may bleed and often have associated redness and swelling. Pain may last up to 24 hours. Occasionally, foreign material may be left in the wound requiring removal. There also is a chance of secondary infection at the wound site, and severe envenomation can lead to local tissue necrosis.8 Systemic effects can occur in some cases, including nausea, vomiting, sweating, headache, dizziness, disorientation, palpitations, and even syncope.9 However, to our knowledge there are no documented cases of human death from a lionfish sting. Anaphylactic reactions are possible and require immediate treatment.6
A study conducted in the French West Indies evaluated 117 patients with lionfish envenomation and found that victims experienced severe pain and local edema (100%), paresthesia (90%), abdominal cramps (62%), extensive edema (53%), tachycardia (34%), skin rash (32%), gastrointestinal tract symptoms (28%), syncope (27%), transient weakness (24%), hypertension (21%), hypotension (18%), and hyperthermia (9%).9 Complications included local infection (18%) such as skin abscess (5%), skin necrosis (3%), and septic arthritis (2%). Twenty-two percent of patients were hospitalized and 8% required surgery. Local infectious complications were more frequent in those with multiple stings (19%). The study concluded that lionfish now represent a major health threat in the West Indies.9 As lionfish numbers have grown, health care providers are seeing increasing numbers of envenomation cases in areas of the coastal southeastern United States and Caribbean associated with considerable morbidity. Providers in nonendemic areas also may see envenomation injuries due to the lionfish popularity in home aquariums.9
Management
Individuals with lionfish stings should immerse the affected area in hot but not scalding water. Those with more serious injuries should seek medical attention. Home remedies that are generally contraindicated include application of topical papain or meat tenderizer.10 Data on ice packs are mixed, but because the toxin is heat labile, the most effective initial step in treatment is immersion of the affected area in water (temperature, 40°C to 45°C) for 30 to 90 minutes.6 The hot water inactivates the heat-labile toxin, leading to near-complete symptomatic relief in 80% of cases and moderate relief in an additional 14%. Immersion time more than 90 minutes considerably increases the risk for burns. Children should always be monitored to prevent burns. If a patient has received a nerve block for analgesia, the wound should not be immersed in hot water to avoid burns to the skin. The wound should be meticulously cleaned with saline irrigation, and radiography or ultrasonography should be performed as deemed necessary to look for any retained foreign bodies.8 Patients may require parenteral or oral analgesia as well as careful follow-up to ensure proper healing.9 Systemic symptoms require supportive care. Venomous fish wounds typically are small and superficial. Empiric antibiotic therapy is not advised for superficial wounds but may be required for clinically infected wounds.8 Tetanus prophylaxis should be given as appropriate to all affected patients. It has been noted that blister fluid contains high concentrations of lionfish venom, and when present, it increases the likelihood of converting the injury from a grade II to grade III wound with tissue necrosis; therefore, blisters should be drained or excised to decrease the chances of subsequent tissue necrosis.11,12 If secondary infection such as cellulitis develops, antibiotics should be chosen to cover likely pathogens including common skin flora such as staphylococci and marine organisms such as Vibrio species. Wounds showing signs of infection should be cultured, with antibiotics adjusted according to sensitivities.5 Deeper wounds should be left open (unsutured) with a proper dressing to heal. Any wounds that involve vascular or joint structures require specialty management. Wounds involving joints may on occasion require surgical exploration and debridement.
Public Health Concerns
In an attempt to slow the growth of their population, human consumption of the fish has been encouraged. The lionfish toxin is inactivated by cooking, and the fish is considered a delicacy; however, a study in the Virgin Islands found that in areas with endemic ciguatera poisoning, 12% of lionfish carried amounts of the toxin above the level considered safe for consumption. This toxin is not inactivated by cooking or freezing and can lead to ciguatera fish poisoning for which there is no antidote and can be associated with prolonged neurotoxicity.13
Conclusion
As lionfish numbers continue to increase, physicians across multiple specialties and regions may see an increase in envenomation injuries. It is important that physicians are aware of how to recognize and treat lionfish stings, as prompt and comprehensive treatment provides benefit to the patient.
The lionfish (Pterois volitans) is a member of the Scorpaenidae family of venomous fish.1-3 Lionfish are an invasive species originally from the Indian and Pacific oceans and the Red Sea that now are widely found throughout tropical and temperate oceans in both hemispheres. They are a popular aquarium fish and were inadvertently introduced in the Atlantic Ocean in South Florida during the late 1980s to early 1990s.2,4 Since then, lionfish have spread into reef systems throughout the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea, and Gulf of Mexico in rapidly growing numbers, and they are now fo und all along the southeastern coast of the United States.5
Characteristics
Lionfish are brightly colored with red or maroon and white stripes, tentacles above the eyes and mouth, fan-shaped pectoral fins, and spines that deliver an especially painful venomous sting that often results in edema (Figure 1). They have 12 dorsal spines, 2 pelvic spines, and 3 anal spines.
Symptoms of Envenomation
As lionfish continue to spread to popular areas of the southeast Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea, the chances of human contact with lionfish have increased. Lionfish stings are now the second most common marine envenomation injury after those caused by stingrays.4 Lionfish stings usually occur on the hands, fingers, or forearms during handling of the fish in ocean waters or in maintenance of aquariums. The mechanism of the venom apparatus is similar for all venomous fish. The spines have surrounding integumentary sheaths containing venom that rupture and inject venom when they penetrate the skin.6 The venom is a heat-labile neuromuscular toxin that causes edema (Figure 2), plasma extravasation, and thrombotic skin lesions.7
Wounds are classified into 3 categories: grade I consists of local erythema/ecchymosis, grade II involves vesicle or blister formation, and grade III denotes wounds that develop local necrosis.8 The sting causes immediate and severe throbbing pain, often described as excruciating or rated 10/10 on a basic pain scale, typically radiating up the affected limb. Puncture sites may bleed and often have associated redness and swelling. Pain may last up to 24 hours. Occasionally, foreign material may be left in the wound requiring removal. There also is a chance of secondary infection at the wound site, and severe envenomation can lead to local tissue necrosis.8 Systemic effects can occur in some cases, including nausea, vomiting, sweating, headache, dizziness, disorientation, palpitations, and even syncope.9 However, to our knowledge there are no documented cases of human death from a lionfish sting. Anaphylactic reactions are possible and require immediate treatment.6
A study conducted in the French West Indies evaluated 117 patients with lionfish envenomation and found that victims experienced severe pain and local edema (100%), paresthesia (90%), abdominal cramps (62%), extensive edema (53%), tachycardia (34%), skin rash (32%), gastrointestinal tract symptoms (28%), syncope (27%), transient weakness (24%), hypertension (21%), hypotension (18%), and hyperthermia (9%).9 Complications included local infection (18%) such as skin abscess (5%), skin necrosis (3%), and septic arthritis (2%). Twenty-two percent of patients were hospitalized and 8% required surgery. Local infectious complications were more frequent in those with multiple stings (19%). The study concluded that lionfish now represent a major health threat in the West Indies.9 As lionfish numbers have grown, health care providers are seeing increasing numbers of envenomation cases in areas of the coastal southeastern United States and Caribbean associated with considerable morbidity. Providers in nonendemic areas also may see envenomation injuries due to the lionfish popularity in home aquariums.9
Management
Individuals with lionfish stings should immerse the affected area in hot but not scalding water. Those with more serious injuries should seek medical attention. Home remedies that are generally contraindicated include application of topical papain or meat tenderizer.10 Data on ice packs are mixed, but because the toxin is heat labile, the most effective initial step in treatment is immersion of the affected area in water (temperature, 40°C to 45°C) for 30 to 90 minutes.6 The hot water inactivates the heat-labile toxin, leading to near-complete symptomatic relief in 80% of cases and moderate relief in an additional 14%. Immersion time more than 90 minutes considerably increases the risk for burns. Children should always be monitored to prevent burns. If a patient has received a nerve block for analgesia, the wound should not be immersed in hot water to avoid burns to the skin. The wound should be meticulously cleaned with saline irrigation, and radiography or ultrasonography should be performed as deemed necessary to look for any retained foreign bodies.8 Patients may require parenteral or oral analgesia as well as careful follow-up to ensure proper healing.9 Systemic symptoms require supportive care. Venomous fish wounds typically are small and superficial. Empiric antibiotic therapy is not advised for superficial wounds but may be required for clinically infected wounds.8 Tetanus prophylaxis should be given as appropriate to all affected patients. It has been noted that blister fluid contains high concentrations of lionfish venom, and when present, it increases the likelihood of converting the injury from a grade II to grade III wound with tissue necrosis; therefore, blisters should be drained or excised to decrease the chances of subsequent tissue necrosis.11,12 If secondary infection such as cellulitis develops, antibiotics should be chosen to cover likely pathogens including common skin flora such as staphylococci and marine organisms such as Vibrio species. Wounds showing signs of infection should be cultured, with antibiotics adjusted according to sensitivities.5 Deeper wounds should be left open (unsutured) with a proper dressing to heal. Any wounds that involve vascular or joint structures require specialty management. Wounds involving joints may on occasion require surgical exploration and debridement.
Public Health Concerns
In an attempt to slow the growth of their population, human consumption of the fish has been encouraged. The lionfish toxin is inactivated by cooking, and the fish is considered a delicacy; however, a study in the Virgin Islands found that in areas with endemic ciguatera poisoning, 12% of lionfish carried amounts of the toxin above the level considered safe for consumption. This toxin is not inactivated by cooking or freezing and can lead to ciguatera fish poisoning for which there is no antidote and can be associated with prolonged neurotoxicity.13
Conclusion
As lionfish numbers continue to increase, physicians across multiple specialties and regions may see an increase in envenomation injuries. It is important that physicians are aware of how to recognize and treat lionfish stings, as prompt and comprehensive treatment provides benefit to the patient.
- Pterois volitans. Integrated Taxonomic Information System website. https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=166883#null. Accessed September 6, 2018.
- Morris JA Jr, Whitfield PE. Biology, Ecology, Control and Management of the Invasive Indopacific Lionfish: An Updated Integrated Assessment. Beaufort, NC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; 2009. http://aquaticcommons.org/2847/1/NCCOS_TM_99.pdf. Accessed September 6, 2018.
- Pterois volitans/miles. US Geological Survey website. https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?speciesID=963. Revised April 18, 2018. Accessed September 6, 2018.
- Diaz JH. Invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans) pose public health threats [published online August 15, 2015]. J La State Med Soc. 2015;167:166-171.
- Diaz JH. Marine Scorpaenidae envenomation in travelers: epidemiology, management, and prevention. J Travel Med. 2015;22:251-258.
- Hobday D, Chadha P, Din AH, et al. Denaturing the lionfish. Eplasty. 2016;16:ic20.
- Sáenz A, Ortiz N, Lomonte B, et al. Comparison of biochemical and cytotoxic activities of extracts obtained from dorsal spines and caudal fin of adult and juvenile non-native Caribbean lionfish (Pterois volitans/miles). Toxicon. 2017;137:158-167.
- Schult RF, Acquisto NM, Stair CK, et al. A case of lionfish envenomation presenting to an inland emergency department [published online August 13, 2017]. Case Rep Emerg Med. 2017;2017:5893563.
- Resiere D, Cerland L, De Haro L, et al. Envenomation by the invasive Pterois volitans species (lionfish) in the French West Indies—a two-year prospective study in Martinique. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2016;54:313-318.
- Auerbach PS. Envenomation by aquatic vertebrates. In: Auerback PS. Wilderness Medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier; 2007:1740-1741.
- Auerbach PS, McKinney HE, Rees RE, et al. Analysis of vesicle fluid following the sting of the lionfish, Pterois volitans. Toxicon. 1987;25:1350-1353.
- Patel MR, Wells S. Lionfish envenomation of the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1993;18:523-525.
- Robertson A, Garcia AC, Quintana HA, et al. Invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans): a potential human health threat for Ciguatera fish poisoning in tropical waters. Marine Drugs. 2014;12:88-97.
- Pterois volitans. Integrated Taxonomic Information System website. https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=166883#null. Accessed September 6, 2018.
- Morris JA Jr, Whitfield PE. Biology, Ecology, Control and Management of the Invasive Indopacific Lionfish: An Updated Integrated Assessment. Beaufort, NC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; 2009. http://aquaticcommons.org/2847/1/NCCOS_TM_99.pdf. Accessed September 6, 2018.
- Pterois volitans/miles. US Geological Survey website. https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?speciesID=963. Revised April 18, 2018. Accessed September 6, 2018.
- Diaz JH. Invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans) pose public health threats [published online August 15, 2015]. J La State Med Soc. 2015;167:166-171.
- Diaz JH. Marine Scorpaenidae envenomation in travelers: epidemiology, management, and prevention. J Travel Med. 2015;22:251-258.
- Hobday D, Chadha P, Din AH, et al. Denaturing the lionfish. Eplasty. 2016;16:ic20.
- Sáenz A, Ortiz N, Lomonte B, et al. Comparison of biochemical and cytotoxic activities of extracts obtained from dorsal spines and caudal fin of adult and juvenile non-native Caribbean lionfish (Pterois volitans/miles). Toxicon. 2017;137:158-167.
- Schult RF, Acquisto NM, Stair CK, et al. A case of lionfish envenomation presenting to an inland emergency department [published online August 13, 2017]. Case Rep Emerg Med. 2017;2017:5893563.
- Resiere D, Cerland L, De Haro L, et al. Envenomation by the invasive Pterois volitans species (lionfish) in the French West Indies—a two-year prospective study in Martinique. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2016;54:313-318.
- Auerbach PS. Envenomation by aquatic vertebrates. In: Auerback PS. Wilderness Medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier; 2007:1740-1741.
- Auerbach PS, McKinney HE, Rees RE, et al. Analysis of vesicle fluid following the sting of the lionfish, Pterois volitans. Toxicon. 1987;25:1350-1353.
- Patel MR, Wells S. Lionfish envenomation of the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1993;18:523-525.
- Robertson A, Garcia AC, Quintana HA, et al. Invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans): a potential human health threat for Ciguatera fish poisoning in tropical waters. Marine Drugs. 2014;12:88-97.
Practice Points
- Lionfish are now found all along the southeastern coast of the United States. Physicians may see an increase in envenomation injuries.
- Treat lionfish envenomation with immediate immersion in warm water (temperature, 40°C to 45°C) for 30 to 90 minutes to deactivate heat-labile toxin.
- Infected wounds should be treated with antibiotics for common skin flora and marine organisms such as Vibrio species.
What’s Eating You? Clothes Moths (Tineola Species)
Clothes moths are common pests found inside buildings such as homes, stores, and museums. The most common species of importance include the webbing clothes moth (Tineola bisselliella)(Figure) and the casemaking clothes moth (Tineola pellionella). Both species target textiles such as wool, rugs, feathers, felts, hair, furs, and even grains.1,2 They avoid synthetics and plant materials such as cottons.1
Characteristics
Adult clothes moths extend 7 to 8 mm and are a golden (T bisselliella) to brown (T pellionella) color with fringed wings and a tuft on their heads.1,3 Adults do not eat; females die within a few days of laying eggs, while males live approximately 1 month. Once laid, eggs hatch within 4 to 10 days.1,3 The larvae (caterpillars) incur damage to clothes and other household goods. Fully mature larvae are 12- to 13-mm long, and the Tineola species have white- to cream-colored bodies with brown heads. The webbing clothes moth larva lacks ocelli (eyes), while the casemaking moth larva has a singular ocellus.1
Transmission
An infestation is evidenced by woolen items that have furrows or holes in them. Pheromone traps also can expose an active infestation.3 The webbing moth larvae can be found beneath a self-spun silken mat on the food source that offers the insect protection and camouflage while it eats; the mat collects frass (feces) and clothes particles.1,3,4 The casemaking moth larvae drag around a portable silken bag that takes on the color of the fabric being eaten and serves as a refuge when disturbed.1,3,4 Both adult and larval stages prefer low light conditions. The total time of development from caterpillar to adult varies depending on the temperature and humidity of the environment, but most clothes moths complete their life cycle within 1 to 3 months.1
Management of an Infestation
Multiple infestation treatment options exist should a patient present with a clothes moth infestation. Infested clothing articles or small blankets and rugs can be dry-cleaned or laundered. Any items not in use should be laundered before being sealed in airtight storage containers. Mothball vapor at appropriate concentrations is lethal to the moths, and when possible, clothing should be stored with mothballs or flakes at the concentration recommended by the manufacturer.4 Individuals should avoid application of household insecticides to clothing or bedding, which may be poisonous to people.1,4 Freezing, heating, and dry ice fumigation techniques also can be used to treat infested products.3 Cedarwood usually is insufficient to deter an infestation, as the oil vapor rarely reaches an effective concentration to repel or harm the insects.3,4 Strict housekeeping with attention to vacuuming carpets, baseboards, closets, and laundering all linens and furniture covers can further reduce an infestation.4 Clothes items can be set in the sunlight and brushed to help loosen the pests, as they dislike direct light and may fall from the garments.3 Dust insecticides also can be used per the manufacturer label to treat crevices and baseboards in an active area of infestation that may otherwise be difficult to clean.3 If an extensive infestation exists or larger items are infested, then a professional pest control agency should be employed for proper eradication.
Conclusion
Understanding the life cycle and basic biology of clothes moths and other common household pests will help the clinician identify an infestation and counsel patients if an insect is a true ectoparasite. Clothes moth larvae are not parasites but can be found on clothing and can be confused with myiasis or true parasites.
- Jacobs S. Clothes moth. Penn State Extension website. http://ento.psu.edu/extension/factsheets/clothes-moth. Updated January 2013. Accessed May 14, 2018.
- Querner P. Insect pests and integrated pest management in museums, libraries and historic buildings. Insects. 2015;6:595-607.
- Choe D-H. Pest notes: clothes moths (publication 7435). University of California Agriculture & Natural Resources website. http://ipm.ucanr.edu/PMG/PESTNOTES/pn7435.html. Updated March 2013. Accessed May 14, 2018.
- Potter M. Entfact-609: clothes moths. Entomology at the University of Kentucky website. https://entomology.ca.uky.edu/ef609. Updated October 2001. Accessed May 14, 2018.
Clothes moths are common pests found inside buildings such as homes, stores, and museums. The most common species of importance include the webbing clothes moth (Tineola bisselliella)(Figure) and the casemaking clothes moth (Tineola pellionella). Both species target textiles such as wool, rugs, feathers, felts, hair, furs, and even grains.1,2 They avoid synthetics and plant materials such as cottons.1
Characteristics
Adult clothes moths extend 7 to 8 mm and are a golden (T bisselliella) to brown (T pellionella) color with fringed wings and a tuft on their heads.1,3 Adults do not eat; females die within a few days of laying eggs, while males live approximately 1 month. Once laid, eggs hatch within 4 to 10 days.1,3 The larvae (caterpillars) incur damage to clothes and other household goods. Fully mature larvae are 12- to 13-mm long, and the Tineola species have white- to cream-colored bodies with brown heads. The webbing clothes moth larva lacks ocelli (eyes), while the casemaking moth larva has a singular ocellus.1
Transmission
An infestation is evidenced by woolen items that have furrows or holes in them. Pheromone traps also can expose an active infestation.3 The webbing moth larvae can be found beneath a self-spun silken mat on the food source that offers the insect protection and camouflage while it eats; the mat collects frass (feces) and clothes particles.1,3,4 The casemaking moth larvae drag around a portable silken bag that takes on the color of the fabric being eaten and serves as a refuge when disturbed.1,3,4 Both adult and larval stages prefer low light conditions. The total time of development from caterpillar to adult varies depending on the temperature and humidity of the environment, but most clothes moths complete their life cycle within 1 to 3 months.1
Management of an Infestation
Multiple infestation treatment options exist should a patient present with a clothes moth infestation. Infested clothing articles or small blankets and rugs can be dry-cleaned or laundered. Any items not in use should be laundered before being sealed in airtight storage containers. Mothball vapor at appropriate concentrations is lethal to the moths, and when possible, clothing should be stored with mothballs or flakes at the concentration recommended by the manufacturer.4 Individuals should avoid application of household insecticides to clothing or bedding, which may be poisonous to people.1,4 Freezing, heating, and dry ice fumigation techniques also can be used to treat infested products.3 Cedarwood usually is insufficient to deter an infestation, as the oil vapor rarely reaches an effective concentration to repel or harm the insects.3,4 Strict housekeeping with attention to vacuuming carpets, baseboards, closets, and laundering all linens and furniture covers can further reduce an infestation.4 Clothes items can be set in the sunlight and brushed to help loosen the pests, as they dislike direct light and may fall from the garments.3 Dust insecticides also can be used per the manufacturer label to treat crevices and baseboards in an active area of infestation that may otherwise be difficult to clean.3 If an extensive infestation exists or larger items are infested, then a professional pest control agency should be employed for proper eradication.
Conclusion
Understanding the life cycle and basic biology of clothes moths and other common household pests will help the clinician identify an infestation and counsel patients if an insect is a true ectoparasite. Clothes moth larvae are not parasites but can be found on clothing and can be confused with myiasis or true parasites.
Clothes moths are common pests found inside buildings such as homes, stores, and museums. The most common species of importance include the webbing clothes moth (Tineola bisselliella)(Figure) and the casemaking clothes moth (Tineola pellionella). Both species target textiles such as wool, rugs, feathers, felts, hair, furs, and even grains.1,2 They avoid synthetics and plant materials such as cottons.1
Characteristics
Adult clothes moths extend 7 to 8 mm and are a golden (T bisselliella) to brown (T pellionella) color with fringed wings and a tuft on their heads.1,3 Adults do not eat; females die within a few days of laying eggs, while males live approximately 1 month. Once laid, eggs hatch within 4 to 10 days.1,3 The larvae (caterpillars) incur damage to clothes and other household goods. Fully mature larvae are 12- to 13-mm long, and the Tineola species have white- to cream-colored bodies with brown heads. The webbing clothes moth larva lacks ocelli (eyes), while the casemaking moth larva has a singular ocellus.1
Transmission
An infestation is evidenced by woolen items that have furrows or holes in them. Pheromone traps also can expose an active infestation.3 The webbing moth larvae can be found beneath a self-spun silken mat on the food source that offers the insect protection and camouflage while it eats; the mat collects frass (feces) and clothes particles.1,3,4 The casemaking moth larvae drag around a portable silken bag that takes on the color of the fabric being eaten and serves as a refuge when disturbed.1,3,4 Both adult and larval stages prefer low light conditions. The total time of development from caterpillar to adult varies depending on the temperature and humidity of the environment, but most clothes moths complete their life cycle within 1 to 3 months.1
Management of an Infestation
Multiple infestation treatment options exist should a patient present with a clothes moth infestation. Infested clothing articles or small blankets and rugs can be dry-cleaned or laundered. Any items not in use should be laundered before being sealed in airtight storage containers. Mothball vapor at appropriate concentrations is lethal to the moths, and when possible, clothing should be stored with mothballs or flakes at the concentration recommended by the manufacturer.4 Individuals should avoid application of household insecticides to clothing or bedding, which may be poisonous to people.1,4 Freezing, heating, and dry ice fumigation techniques also can be used to treat infested products.3 Cedarwood usually is insufficient to deter an infestation, as the oil vapor rarely reaches an effective concentration to repel or harm the insects.3,4 Strict housekeeping with attention to vacuuming carpets, baseboards, closets, and laundering all linens and furniture covers can further reduce an infestation.4 Clothes items can be set in the sunlight and brushed to help loosen the pests, as they dislike direct light and may fall from the garments.3 Dust insecticides also can be used per the manufacturer label to treat crevices and baseboards in an active area of infestation that may otherwise be difficult to clean.3 If an extensive infestation exists or larger items are infested, then a professional pest control agency should be employed for proper eradication.
Conclusion
Understanding the life cycle and basic biology of clothes moths and other common household pests will help the clinician identify an infestation and counsel patients if an insect is a true ectoparasite. Clothes moth larvae are not parasites but can be found on clothing and can be confused with myiasis or true parasites.
- Jacobs S. Clothes moth. Penn State Extension website. http://ento.psu.edu/extension/factsheets/clothes-moth. Updated January 2013. Accessed May 14, 2018.
- Querner P. Insect pests and integrated pest management in museums, libraries and historic buildings. Insects. 2015;6:595-607.
- Choe D-H. Pest notes: clothes moths (publication 7435). University of California Agriculture & Natural Resources website. http://ipm.ucanr.edu/PMG/PESTNOTES/pn7435.html. Updated March 2013. Accessed May 14, 2018.
- Potter M. Entfact-609: clothes moths. Entomology at the University of Kentucky website. https://entomology.ca.uky.edu/ef609. Updated October 2001. Accessed May 14, 2018.
- Jacobs S. Clothes moth. Penn State Extension website. http://ento.psu.edu/extension/factsheets/clothes-moth. Updated January 2013. Accessed May 14, 2018.
- Querner P. Insect pests and integrated pest management in museums, libraries and historic buildings. Insects. 2015;6:595-607.
- Choe D-H. Pest notes: clothes moths (publication 7435). University of California Agriculture & Natural Resources website. http://ipm.ucanr.edu/PMG/PESTNOTES/pn7435.html. Updated March 2013. Accessed May 14, 2018.
- Potter M. Entfact-609: clothes moths. Entomology at the University of Kentucky website. https://entomology.ca.uky.edu/ef609. Updated October 2001. Accessed May 14, 2018.
Practice Points
- Clothes moth larvae are common household pests that may be misidentified as a parasitic infection such as myiasis when found on a person.
- Understanding the basic biology of clothes moths will help the clinician identify an infestation and appropriately counsel patients that clothes moths do not pose a considerable health risk.
What’s Eating You? Ixodes Tick and Related Diseases, Part 3: Coinfection and Tick-Bite Prevention
Tick-borne diseases are increasing in prevalence, likely due to climate change in combination with human movement into tick habitats.1-3 The Ixodes genus of hard ticks is a common vector for the transmission of pathogenic viruses, bacteria, parasites, and toxins. Among these, Lyme disease, which is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi, is the most prevalent, followed by babesiosis and human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA), respectively.4 In Europe, tick-borne encephalitis is commonly encountered. More recently identified diseases transmitted by Ixodes ticks include Powassan virus and Borrelia miyamotoi infection; however, these diseases are less frequently encountered than other tick-borne diseases.5,6
As tick-borne diseases become more prevalent, the likelihood of coinfection with more than one Ixodes-transmitted pathogen is increasing.7 Therefore, it is important for physicians who practice in endemic areas to be aware of the possibility of coinfection, which can alter clinical presentation, disease severity, and treatment response in tick-borne diseases. Additionally, public education on tick-bite prevention and prompt tick removal is necessary to combat the rising prevalence of these diseases.
Coinfection
Risk of coinfection with more than one tick-borne disease is contingent on the geographic distribution of the tick species as well as the particular pathogen’s prevalence within reservoir hosts in a given area (Figure). Most coinfections occur with B. burgdorferi and an additional pathogen, usually Anaplasma phagocytophilum (which causes human granulocytic anaplasmosis [HGA]) or Babesia microti (which causes babesiosis). In Europe, coinfection with tick-borne encephalitis virus may occur. There is limited evidence of human coinfection with B miyamotoi or Powassan virus, as isolated infection with either of these pathogens is rare.
In patients with Lyme disease, as many as 35% may have concurrent babesiosis, and as many as 12% may have concurrent HGA in endemic areas (eg, northeast and northern central United States).7-9 Concurrent HGA and babesiosis in the absence of Lyme disease also has been documented.7-9 Coinfection generally increases the diversity of presenting symptoms, often obscuring the primary diagnosis. In addition, these patients may have more severe and prolonged illness.8,10,11
In endemic areas, coinfection with B burgdorferi and an additional pathogen should be suspected if a patient presents with typical symptoms of early Lyme disease, especially erythema migrans, along with (1) combination of fever, chills, and headache; (2) prolonged viral-like illness, particularly 48 hours after appropriate antibiotic treatment; and (3) unexplained blood dyscrasia.7,11,12 When a patient presents with erythema migrans, it is unnecessary to test for HGA, as treatment of Lyme disease with doxycycline also is adequate for treating HGA; however, if systemic symptoms persist despite treatment, testing for babesiosis and other tick-borne illnesses should be considered, as babesiosis requires treatment with atovaquone plus azithromycin or clindamycin plus quinine.13
A complete blood count and peripheral blood smear can aid in the diagnosis of coinfection. The complete blood count may reveal leukopenia, anemia, or thrombocytopenia associated with HGA or babesiosis. The peripheral blood smear can reveal inclusions of intra-erythrocytic ring forms and tetrads (the “Maltese cross” appearance) in babesiosis and intragranulocytic morulae in HGA.12 The most sensitive diagnostic tests for tick-borne diseases are organism-specific IgM and IgG serology for Lyme disease, babesiosis, and HGA and polymerase chain reaction for babesiosis and HGA.7
Prevention Strategies
The most effective means of controlling tick-borne disease is avoiding tick bites altogether. One method is to avoid spending time in high-risk areas that may be infested with ticks, particularly low-lying brush, where ticks are likely to hide.14 For individuals traveling in environments with a high risk of tick exposure, behavioral methods of avoidance are indicated, including wearing long pants and a shirt with long sleeves, tucking the shirt into the pants, and wearing closed-toe shoes. Wearing light-colored clothing may aid in tick identification and prompt removal prior to attachment. Permethrin-impregnated clothing has been proven to decrease the likelihood of tick bites in adults working outdoors.15-17
Topical repellents also play a role in the prevention of tick-borne diseases. The most effective and safe synthetic repellents are N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET); picaridin; p-menthane-3,8-diol; and insect repellent 3535 (IR3535)(ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate).16-19 Plant-based repellents also are available, but their efficacy is strongly influenced by the surrounding environment (eg, temperature, humidity, organic matter).20-22 Individuals also may be exposed to ticks following contact with domesticated animals and pets.23,24 Tick prevention in pets with the use of ectoparasiticides should be directed by a qualified veterinarian.25
Tick Removal
Following a bite, the tick should be removed promptly to avoid transmission of pathogens. Numerous commercial and in-home methods of tick removal are available, but not all are equally effective. Detachment techniques include removal with a card or commercially available radiofrequency device, lassoing, or freezing.26,27 However, the most effective method is simple removal with tweezers. The tick should be grasped close to the skin surface and pulled upward with an even pressure. Commercially available tick-removal devices have not been shown to produce better outcomes than removal of the tick with tweezers.28
Conclusion
When patients do not respond to therapy for presumed tick-borne infection, the diagnosis should be reconsidered. One important consideration is coinfection with a second organism. Prompt identification and removal of ticks can prevent disease transmission.
- McMichael C, Barnett J, McMichael AJ. An ill wind? climate change, migration, and health. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:646-654.
- Ostfeld RS, Brunner JL. Climate change and Ixodes tick-borne diseases of humans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370:20140051.
- Ogden NH, Bigras-Poulin M, O’Callaghan CJ, et al. Vector seasonality, host infection dynamics and fitness of pathogens transmitted by the tick Ixodes scapularis. Parasitology. 2007;134(pt 2):209-227.
- Tickborne diseases of the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/ticks/diseases/index.html. Updated July 25, 2017. Accessed April 10, 2018.
- Hinten SR, Beckett GA, Gensheimer KF, et al. Increased recognition of Powassan encephalitis in the United States, 1999-2005. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8:733-740.
- Platonov AE, Karan LS, Kolyasnikova NM, et al. Humans infected with relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia miyamotoi, Russia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1816-1823.
- Krause PJ, McKay K, Thompson CA, et al; Deer-Associated Infection Study Group. Disease-specific diagnosis of coinfecting tickborne zoonoses: babesiosis, human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, and Lyme disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:1184-1191.
- Krause PJ, Telford SR 3rd, Spielman A, et al. Concurrent Lyme disease and babesiosis. evidence for increased severity and duration of illness. JAMA. 1996;275:1657-1660.
- Belongia EA, Reed KD, Mitchell PD, et al. Clinical and epidemiological features of early Lyme disease and human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Wisconsin. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29:1472-1477.
- Sweeny CJ, Ghassemi M, Agger WA, et al. Coinfection with Babesia microti and Borrelia burgdorferi in a western Wisconsin resident. Mayo Clin Proc.1998;73:338-341.
- Nadelman RB, Horowitz HW, Hsieh TC, et al. Simultaneous human granulocytic ehrlichiosis and Lyme borreliosis. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:27-30.
- Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED, et al. The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:1089-1134.
- Swanson SJ, Neitzel D, Reed DK, et al. Coinfections acquired from Ixodes ticks. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:708-727.
- Hayes EB, Piesman J. How can we prevent Lyme disease? N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2424-2430.
- Vaughn MF, Funkhouser SW, Lin FC, et al. Long-lasting permethrin impregnated uniforms: a randomized-controlled trial for tick bite prevention. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46:473-480.
- Miller NJ, Rainone EE, Dyer MC, et al. Tick bite protection with permethrin-treated summer-weight clothing. J Med Entomol. 2011;48:327-333.
- Richards SL, Balanay JAG, Harris JW. Effectiveness of permethrin-treated clothing to prevent tick exposure in foresters in the central Appalachian region of the USA. Int J Environ Health Res. 2015;25:453-462.
- Pages F, Dautel H, Duvallet G, et al. Tick repellents for human use: prevention of tick bites and tick-borne diseases. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2014;14:85-93.
- Büchel K, Bendin J, Gharbi A, et al. Repellent efficacy of DEET, icaridin, and EBAAP against Ixodes ricinus and Ixodes scapularis nymphs (Acari, Ixodidae). Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2015;6:494-498.
- Schwantes U, Dautel H, Jung G. Prevention of infectious tick-borne diseases in humans: comparative studies of the repellency of different dodecanoic acid-formulations against Ixodes ricinus ticks (Acari: Ixodidae). Parasit Vectors. 2008;8:1-8.
- Bissinger BW, Apperson CS, Sonenshine DE, et al. Efficacy of the new repellent BioUD against three species of ixodid ticks. Exp Appl Acarol. 2009;48:239-250.
- Feaster JE, Scialdone MA, Todd RG, et al. Dihydronepetalactones deter feeding activity by mosquitoes, stable flies, and deer ticks. J Med Entomol. 2009;46:832-840.
- Jennett AL, Smith FD, Wall R. Tick infestation risk for dogs in a peri-urban park. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:358.
- Rand PW, Smith RP Jr, Lacombe EH. Canine seroprevalence and the distribution of Ixodes dammini in an area of emerging Lyme disease. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1331-1334.
- Baneth G, Bourdeau P, Bourdoiseau G, et al; CVBD World Forum. Vector-borne diseases—constant challenge for practicing veterinarians: recommendations from the CVBD World Forum. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:55.
- Akin Belli A, Dervis E, Kar S, et al. Revisiting detachment techniques in human-biting ticks. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75:393-397.
- Ashique KT, Kaliyadan F. Radiofrequency device for tick removal. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72:155-156.
- Due C, Fox W, Medlock JM, et al. Tick bite prevention and tick removal. BMJ. 2013;347:f7123.
Tick-borne diseases are increasing in prevalence, likely due to climate change in combination with human movement into tick habitats.1-3 The Ixodes genus of hard ticks is a common vector for the transmission of pathogenic viruses, bacteria, parasites, and toxins. Among these, Lyme disease, which is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi, is the most prevalent, followed by babesiosis and human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA), respectively.4 In Europe, tick-borne encephalitis is commonly encountered. More recently identified diseases transmitted by Ixodes ticks include Powassan virus and Borrelia miyamotoi infection; however, these diseases are less frequently encountered than other tick-borne diseases.5,6
As tick-borne diseases become more prevalent, the likelihood of coinfection with more than one Ixodes-transmitted pathogen is increasing.7 Therefore, it is important for physicians who practice in endemic areas to be aware of the possibility of coinfection, which can alter clinical presentation, disease severity, and treatment response in tick-borne diseases. Additionally, public education on tick-bite prevention and prompt tick removal is necessary to combat the rising prevalence of these diseases.
Coinfection
Risk of coinfection with more than one tick-borne disease is contingent on the geographic distribution of the tick species as well as the particular pathogen’s prevalence within reservoir hosts in a given area (Figure). Most coinfections occur with B. burgdorferi and an additional pathogen, usually Anaplasma phagocytophilum (which causes human granulocytic anaplasmosis [HGA]) or Babesia microti (which causes babesiosis). In Europe, coinfection with tick-borne encephalitis virus may occur. There is limited evidence of human coinfection with B miyamotoi or Powassan virus, as isolated infection with either of these pathogens is rare.
In patients with Lyme disease, as many as 35% may have concurrent babesiosis, and as many as 12% may have concurrent HGA in endemic areas (eg, northeast and northern central United States).7-9 Concurrent HGA and babesiosis in the absence of Lyme disease also has been documented.7-9 Coinfection generally increases the diversity of presenting symptoms, often obscuring the primary diagnosis. In addition, these patients may have more severe and prolonged illness.8,10,11
In endemic areas, coinfection with B burgdorferi and an additional pathogen should be suspected if a patient presents with typical symptoms of early Lyme disease, especially erythema migrans, along with (1) combination of fever, chills, and headache; (2) prolonged viral-like illness, particularly 48 hours after appropriate antibiotic treatment; and (3) unexplained blood dyscrasia.7,11,12 When a patient presents with erythema migrans, it is unnecessary to test for HGA, as treatment of Lyme disease with doxycycline also is adequate for treating HGA; however, if systemic symptoms persist despite treatment, testing for babesiosis and other tick-borne illnesses should be considered, as babesiosis requires treatment with atovaquone plus azithromycin or clindamycin plus quinine.13
A complete blood count and peripheral blood smear can aid in the diagnosis of coinfection. The complete blood count may reveal leukopenia, anemia, or thrombocytopenia associated with HGA or babesiosis. The peripheral blood smear can reveal inclusions of intra-erythrocytic ring forms and tetrads (the “Maltese cross” appearance) in babesiosis and intragranulocytic morulae in HGA.12 The most sensitive diagnostic tests for tick-borne diseases are organism-specific IgM and IgG serology for Lyme disease, babesiosis, and HGA and polymerase chain reaction for babesiosis and HGA.7
Prevention Strategies
The most effective means of controlling tick-borne disease is avoiding tick bites altogether. One method is to avoid spending time in high-risk areas that may be infested with ticks, particularly low-lying brush, where ticks are likely to hide.14 For individuals traveling in environments with a high risk of tick exposure, behavioral methods of avoidance are indicated, including wearing long pants and a shirt with long sleeves, tucking the shirt into the pants, and wearing closed-toe shoes. Wearing light-colored clothing may aid in tick identification and prompt removal prior to attachment. Permethrin-impregnated clothing has been proven to decrease the likelihood of tick bites in adults working outdoors.15-17
Topical repellents also play a role in the prevention of tick-borne diseases. The most effective and safe synthetic repellents are N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET); picaridin; p-menthane-3,8-diol; and insect repellent 3535 (IR3535)(ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate).16-19 Plant-based repellents also are available, but their efficacy is strongly influenced by the surrounding environment (eg, temperature, humidity, organic matter).20-22 Individuals also may be exposed to ticks following contact with domesticated animals and pets.23,24 Tick prevention in pets with the use of ectoparasiticides should be directed by a qualified veterinarian.25
Tick Removal
Following a bite, the tick should be removed promptly to avoid transmission of pathogens. Numerous commercial and in-home methods of tick removal are available, but not all are equally effective. Detachment techniques include removal with a card or commercially available radiofrequency device, lassoing, or freezing.26,27 However, the most effective method is simple removal with tweezers. The tick should be grasped close to the skin surface and pulled upward with an even pressure. Commercially available tick-removal devices have not been shown to produce better outcomes than removal of the tick with tweezers.28
Conclusion
When patients do not respond to therapy for presumed tick-borne infection, the diagnosis should be reconsidered. One important consideration is coinfection with a second organism. Prompt identification and removal of ticks can prevent disease transmission.
Tick-borne diseases are increasing in prevalence, likely due to climate change in combination with human movement into tick habitats.1-3 The Ixodes genus of hard ticks is a common vector for the transmission of pathogenic viruses, bacteria, parasites, and toxins. Among these, Lyme disease, which is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi, is the most prevalent, followed by babesiosis and human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA), respectively.4 In Europe, tick-borne encephalitis is commonly encountered. More recently identified diseases transmitted by Ixodes ticks include Powassan virus and Borrelia miyamotoi infection; however, these diseases are less frequently encountered than other tick-borne diseases.5,6
As tick-borne diseases become more prevalent, the likelihood of coinfection with more than one Ixodes-transmitted pathogen is increasing.7 Therefore, it is important for physicians who practice in endemic areas to be aware of the possibility of coinfection, which can alter clinical presentation, disease severity, and treatment response in tick-borne diseases. Additionally, public education on tick-bite prevention and prompt tick removal is necessary to combat the rising prevalence of these diseases.
Coinfection
Risk of coinfection with more than one tick-borne disease is contingent on the geographic distribution of the tick species as well as the particular pathogen’s prevalence within reservoir hosts in a given area (Figure). Most coinfections occur with B. burgdorferi and an additional pathogen, usually Anaplasma phagocytophilum (which causes human granulocytic anaplasmosis [HGA]) or Babesia microti (which causes babesiosis). In Europe, coinfection with tick-borne encephalitis virus may occur. There is limited evidence of human coinfection with B miyamotoi or Powassan virus, as isolated infection with either of these pathogens is rare.
In patients with Lyme disease, as many as 35% may have concurrent babesiosis, and as many as 12% may have concurrent HGA in endemic areas (eg, northeast and northern central United States).7-9 Concurrent HGA and babesiosis in the absence of Lyme disease also has been documented.7-9 Coinfection generally increases the diversity of presenting symptoms, often obscuring the primary diagnosis. In addition, these patients may have more severe and prolonged illness.8,10,11
In endemic areas, coinfection with B burgdorferi and an additional pathogen should be suspected if a patient presents with typical symptoms of early Lyme disease, especially erythema migrans, along with (1) combination of fever, chills, and headache; (2) prolonged viral-like illness, particularly 48 hours after appropriate antibiotic treatment; and (3) unexplained blood dyscrasia.7,11,12 When a patient presents with erythema migrans, it is unnecessary to test for HGA, as treatment of Lyme disease with doxycycline also is adequate for treating HGA; however, if systemic symptoms persist despite treatment, testing for babesiosis and other tick-borne illnesses should be considered, as babesiosis requires treatment with atovaquone plus azithromycin or clindamycin plus quinine.13
A complete blood count and peripheral blood smear can aid in the diagnosis of coinfection. The complete blood count may reveal leukopenia, anemia, or thrombocytopenia associated with HGA or babesiosis. The peripheral blood smear can reveal inclusions of intra-erythrocytic ring forms and tetrads (the “Maltese cross” appearance) in babesiosis and intragranulocytic morulae in HGA.12 The most sensitive diagnostic tests for tick-borne diseases are organism-specific IgM and IgG serology for Lyme disease, babesiosis, and HGA and polymerase chain reaction for babesiosis and HGA.7
Prevention Strategies
The most effective means of controlling tick-borne disease is avoiding tick bites altogether. One method is to avoid spending time in high-risk areas that may be infested with ticks, particularly low-lying brush, where ticks are likely to hide.14 For individuals traveling in environments with a high risk of tick exposure, behavioral methods of avoidance are indicated, including wearing long pants and a shirt with long sleeves, tucking the shirt into the pants, and wearing closed-toe shoes. Wearing light-colored clothing may aid in tick identification and prompt removal prior to attachment. Permethrin-impregnated clothing has been proven to decrease the likelihood of tick bites in adults working outdoors.15-17
Topical repellents also play a role in the prevention of tick-borne diseases. The most effective and safe synthetic repellents are N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET); picaridin; p-menthane-3,8-diol; and insect repellent 3535 (IR3535)(ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate).16-19 Plant-based repellents also are available, but their efficacy is strongly influenced by the surrounding environment (eg, temperature, humidity, organic matter).20-22 Individuals also may be exposed to ticks following contact with domesticated animals and pets.23,24 Tick prevention in pets with the use of ectoparasiticides should be directed by a qualified veterinarian.25
Tick Removal
Following a bite, the tick should be removed promptly to avoid transmission of pathogens. Numerous commercial and in-home methods of tick removal are available, but not all are equally effective. Detachment techniques include removal with a card or commercially available radiofrequency device, lassoing, or freezing.26,27 However, the most effective method is simple removal with tweezers. The tick should be grasped close to the skin surface and pulled upward with an even pressure. Commercially available tick-removal devices have not been shown to produce better outcomes than removal of the tick with tweezers.28
Conclusion
When patients do not respond to therapy for presumed tick-borne infection, the diagnosis should be reconsidered. One important consideration is coinfection with a second organism. Prompt identification and removal of ticks can prevent disease transmission.
- McMichael C, Barnett J, McMichael AJ. An ill wind? climate change, migration, and health. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:646-654.
- Ostfeld RS, Brunner JL. Climate change and Ixodes tick-borne diseases of humans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370:20140051.
- Ogden NH, Bigras-Poulin M, O’Callaghan CJ, et al. Vector seasonality, host infection dynamics and fitness of pathogens transmitted by the tick Ixodes scapularis. Parasitology. 2007;134(pt 2):209-227.
- Tickborne diseases of the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/ticks/diseases/index.html. Updated July 25, 2017. Accessed April 10, 2018.
- Hinten SR, Beckett GA, Gensheimer KF, et al. Increased recognition of Powassan encephalitis in the United States, 1999-2005. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8:733-740.
- Platonov AE, Karan LS, Kolyasnikova NM, et al. Humans infected with relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia miyamotoi, Russia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1816-1823.
- Krause PJ, McKay K, Thompson CA, et al; Deer-Associated Infection Study Group. Disease-specific diagnosis of coinfecting tickborne zoonoses: babesiosis, human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, and Lyme disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:1184-1191.
- Krause PJ, Telford SR 3rd, Spielman A, et al. Concurrent Lyme disease and babesiosis. evidence for increased severity and duration of illness. JAMA. 1996;275:1657-1660.
- Belongia EA, Reed KD, Mitchell PD, et al. Clinical and epidemiological features of early Lyme disease and human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Wisconsin. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29:1472-1477.
- Sweeny CJ, Ghassemi M, Agger WA, et al. Coinfection with Babesia microti and Borrelia burgdorferi in a western Wisconsin resident. Mayo Clin Proc.1998;73:338-341.
- Nadelman RB, Horowitz HW, Hsieh TC, et al. Simultaneous human granulocytic ehrlichiosis and Lyme borreliosis. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:27-30.
- Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED, et al. The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:1089-1134.
- Swanson SJ, Neitzel D, Reed DK, et al. Coinfections acquired from Ixodes ticks. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:708-727.
- Hayes EB, Piesman J. How can we prevent Lyme disease? N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2424-2430.
- Vaughn MF, Funkhouser SW, Lin FC, et al. Long-lasting permethrin impregnated uniforms: a randomized-controlled trial for tick bite prevention. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46:473-480.
- Miller NJ, Rainone EE, Dyer MC, et al. Tick bite protection with permethrin-treated summer-weight clothing. J Med Entomol. 2011;48:327-333.
- Richards SL, Balanay JAG, Harris JW. Effectiveness of permethrin-treated clothing to prevent tick exposure in foresters in the central Appalachian region of the USA. Int J Environ Health Res. 2015;25:453-462.
- Pages F, Dautel H, Duvallet G, et al. Tick repellents for human use: prevention of tick bites and tick-borne diseases. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2014;14:85-93.
- Büchel K, Bendin J, Gharbi A, et al. Repellent efficacy of DEET, icaridin, and EBAAP against Ixodes ricinus and Ixodes scapularis nymphs (Acari, Ixodidae). Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2015;6:494-498.
- Schwantes U, Dautel H, Jung G. Prevention of infectious tick-borne diseases in humans: comparative studies of the repellency of different dodecanoic acid-formulations against Ixodes ricinus ticks (Acari: Ixodidae). Parasit Vectors. 2008;8:1-8.
- Bissinger BW, Apperson CS, Sonenshine DE, et al. Efficacy of the new repellent BioUD against three species of ixodid ticks. Exp Appl Acarol. 2009;48:239-250.
- Feaster JE, Scialdone MA, Todd RG, et al. Dihydronepetalactones deter feeding activity by mosquitoes, stable flies, and deer ticks. J Med Entomol. 2009;46:832-840.
- Jennett AL, Smith FD, Wall R. Tick infestation risk for dogs in a peri-urban park. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:358.
- Rand PW, Smith RP Jr, Lacombe EH. Canine seroprevalence and the distribution of Ixodes dammini in an area of emerging Lyme disease. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1331-1334.
- Baneth G, Bourdeau P, Bourdoiseau G, et al; CVBD World Forum. Vector-borne diseases—constant challenge for practicing veterinarians: recommendations from the CVBD World Forum. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:55.
- Akin Belli A, Dervis E, Kar S, et al. Revisiting detachment techniques in human-biting ticks. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75:393-397.
- Ashique KT, Kaliyadan F. Radiofrequency device for tick removal. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72:155-156.
- Due C, Fox W, Medlock JM, et al. Tick bite prevention and tick removal. BMJ. 2013;347:f7123.
- McMichael C, Barnett J, McMichael AJ. An ill wind? climate change, migration, and health. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:646-654.
- Ostfeld RS, Brunner JL. Climate change and Ixodes tick-borne diseases of humans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370:20140051.
- Ogden NH, Bigras-Poulin M, O’Callaghan CJ, et al. Vector seasonality, host infection dynamics and fitness of pathogens transmitted by the tick Ixodes scapularis. Parasitology. 2007;134(pt 2):209-227.
- Tickborne diseases of the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/ticks/diseases/index.html. Updated July 25, 2017. Accessed April 10, 2018.
- Hinten SR, Beckett GA, Gensheimer KF, et al. Increased recognition of Powassan encephalitis in the United States, 1999-2005. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8:733-740.
- Platonov AE, Karan LS, Kolyasnikova NM, et al. Humans infected with relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia miyamotoi, Russia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1816-1823.
- Krause PJ, McKay K, Thompson CA, et al; Deer-Associated Infection Study Group. Disease-specific diagnosis of coinfecting tickborne zoonoses: babesiosis, human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, and Lyme disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:1184-1191.
- Krause PJ, Telford SR 3rd, Spielman A, et al. Concurrent Lyme disease and babesiosis. evidence for increased severity and duration of illness. JAMA. 1996;275:1657-1660.
- Belongia EA, Reed KD, Mitchell PD, et al. Clinical and epidemiological features of early Lyme disease and human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Wisconsin. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29:1472-1477.
- Sweeny CJ, Ghassemi M, Agger WA, et al. Coinfection with Babesia microti and Borrelia burgdorferi in a western Wisconsin resident. Mayo Clin Proc.1998;73:338-341.
- Nadelman RB, Horowitz HW, Hsieh TC, et al. Simultaneous human granulocytic ehrlichiosis and Lyme borreliosis. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:27-30.
- Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED, et al. The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:1089-1134.
- Swanson SJ, Neitzel D, Reed DK, et al. Coinfections acquired from Ixodes ticks. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:708-727.
- Hayes EB, Piesman J. How can we prevent Lyme disease? N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2424-2430.
- Vaughn MF, Funkhouser SW, Lin FC, et al. Long-lasting permethrin impregnated uniforms: a randomized-controlled trial for tick bite prevention. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46:473-480.
- Miller NJ, Rainone EE, Dyer MC, et al. Tick bite protection with permethrin-treated summer-weight clothing. J Med Entomol. 2011;48:327-333.
- Richards SL, Balanay JAG, Harris JW. Effectiveness of permethrin-treated clothing to prevent tick exposure in foresters in the central Appalachian region of the USA. Int J Environ Health Res. 2015;25:453-462.
- Pages F, Dautel H, Duvallet G, et al. Tick repellents for human use: prevention of tick bites and tick-borne diseases. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2014;14:85-93.
- Büchel K, Bendin J, Gharbi A, et al. Repellent efficacy of DEET, icaridin, and EBAAP against Ixodes ricinus and Ixodes scapularis nymphs (Acari, Ixodidae). Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2015;6:494-498.
- Schwantes U, Dautel H, Jung G. Prevention of infectious tick-borne diseases in humans: comparative studies of the repellency of different dodecanoic acid-formulations against Ixodes ricinus ticks (Acari: Ixodidae). Parasit Vectors. 2008;8:1-8.
- Bissinger BW, Apperson CS, Sonenshine DE, et al. Efficacy of the new repellent BioUD against three species of ixodid ticks. Exp Appl Acarol. 2009;48:239-250.
- Feaster JE, Scialdone MA, Todd RG, et al. Dihydronepetalactones deter feeding activity by mosquitoes, stable flies, and deer ticks. J Med Entomol. 2009;46:832-840.
- Jennett AL, Smith FD, Wall R. Tick infestation risk for dogs in a peri-urban park. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:358.
- Rand PW, Smith RP Jr, Lacombe EH. Canine seroprevalence and the distribution of Ixodes dammini in an area of emerging Lyme disease. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1331-1334.
- Baneth G, Bourdeau P, Bourdoiseau G, et al; CVBD World Forum. Vector-borne diseases—constant challenge for practicing veterinarians: recommendations from the CVBD World Forum. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:55.
- Akin Belli A, Dervis E, Kar S, et al. Revisiting detachment techniques in human-biting ticks. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75:393-397.
- Ashique KT, Kaliyadan F. Radiofrequency device for tick removal. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72:155-156.
- Due C, Fox W, Medlock JM, et al. Tick bite prevention and tick removal. BMJ. 2013;347:f7123.
Practice Points
- As tick-borne diseases become more prevalent, the likelihood of coinfection with more than one Ixodes-transmitted pathogen is increasing, particularly in endemic areas.
- Coinfection generally increases the diversity of presenting symptoms, obscuring the primary diagnosis. The disease course also may be prolonged and more severe.
- Prevention of tick attachment and prompt tick removal are critical to combating the rising prevalence of tick-borne diseases.
What’s Eating You? Ixodes Tick and Related Diseases, Part 2: Diagnosis and Treatment of Regional Tick-borne Diseases
The Ixodes tick is prevalent in temperate climates worldwide. During a blood meal, pathogens may be transmitted from the tick to its host. Borrelia burgdorferi, a spirochete responsible for Lyme disease, is the most prevalent pathogen transmitted by Ixodes ticks.1 Borrelia mayonii recently was identified as an additional cause of Lyme disease in the United States.2
The Ixodes tick also is associated with several less common pathogens, including Babesia microti and the tick-borne encephalitis virus, which have been recognized as Ixodes-associated pathogens for many years.3,4 Other pathogens have been identified, including Anaplasma phagocytophilum, recognized in the 1990s as the cause of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, as well as the Powassan virus and Borrelia miyamotoi.5-7 Additionally, tick paralysis has been associated with toxins in the saliva of various species of several genera of ticks, including some Ixodes species.8 Due to an overlap in geographic distribution (Figure) and disease presentations (eTable), it is important that physicians be familiar with these regional pathogens transmitted by Ixodes ticks.
Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis
Formerly known as human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, human granulocytic anaplasmosis is caused by A phagocytophilum and is transmitted by Ixodes scapularis, Ixodes pacificus, and Ixodes persulcatus. The incidence of human granulocytic anaplasmosis in the United States increased 12-fold from 2001 to 2011.9
Presenting symptoms generally are nonspecific, including fever, night sweats, headache, myalgias, and arthralgias, often resulting in misdiagnosis as a viral infection. Laboratory abnormalities include mild transaminitis, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia.9,10 Although most infections resolve spontaneously, 3% of patients develop serious complications. The mortality rate is 0.6%.11
A diagnosis of human granulocytic anaplasmosis should be suspected in patients with a viral-like illness and exposure to ticks in an endemic area. The diagnosis can be confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), acute- and convalescent-phase serologic testing, or direct fluorescent antibody screening. Characteristic morulae may be present in granulocytes.12 Treatment typically includes doxycycline, which also covers B burgdorferi coinfection. When a diagnosis of human granulocytic anaplasmosis is suspected, treatment should never be delayed to await laboratory confirmation. If no clinical improvement is seen within 48 hours, alternate diagnoses or coinfection with B microti should be considered.10
Babesiosis
The protozoan B microti causes babesiosis in the United States, with Babesia divergens being more common in Europe.13 Reported cases of babesiosis in New York increased as much as 20-fold from 2001 to 2008.14 Transmission primarily is from the Ixodes tick but rarely can occur from blood transfusion.15 Tick attachment for at least 36 hours is required for transmission.13
The clinical presentation of babesiosis ranges from asymptomatic to fatal. Symptoms generally are nonspecific, resembling a viral infection and including headache, nausea, diarrhea, arthralgia, and myalgia. Laboratory evaluation may reveal hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, transaminitis, and elevated blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels.16 Rash is not typical. Resolution of symptoms generally occurs within 2 weeks of presentation, although anemia may persist for months.13 Severe disease is more common among elderly and immunocompromised patients. Complications include respiratory failure, renal failure, congestive heart failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. The mortality rate in the United States is approximately 10%.10,16
A diagnosis of babesiosis is made based on the presence of flulike symptoms, laboratory results, and history of recent travel to an endemic area. A thin blood smear allows identification of the organism in erythrocytes as ring forms or tetrads (a “Maltese cross” appearance).17 Polymerase chain reaction is more sensitive than a blood smear, especially in early disease.18 Indirect fluorescent antibody testing is species-specific but cannot verify active infection.10
Treatment of babesiosis is indicated for symptomatic patients with active infection. Positive serology alone is not an indication for treatment. Asymptomatic patients with positive serology should have diagnostic testing repeated in 3 months with subsequent treatment if parasitemia persists. Mild disease is treated with atovaquone plus azithromycin or clindamycin plus quinine. Severe babesiosis is treated with quinine and intravenous clindamycin and may require exchange transfusion.10 Coinfection with B burgdorferi should be considered in patients with flulike symptoms and erythema migrans or treatment failure. Coinfection is diagnosed by Lyme serology plus PCR for B microti. This is an important consideration because treatment of babesiosis does not eradicate B burgdorferi infection.19
Powassan Virus
Powassan virus is a flavivirus that causes encephalitis. It is transmitted by Ixodes cookei (Powassan virus, lineage I) in the Great Lakes region and by I scapularis (Powassan virus, lineage II, or deer tick virus) in the northeastern United States. Transmission can occur within 15 minutes of tick attachment.6,20,21
Patients typically present with fever, headache, altered mental status, seizures, and focal neurologic deficits. Gastrointestinal symptoms and rash also have been reported.21 The diagnosis is made based on clinical presentation and laboratory testing with PCR or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Cross-reactivity on ELISA exists, necessitating confirmation with a neutralizing antibody or PCR. Treatment is supportive. Corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin have been proposed as treatment modalities, but evidence of their efficacy is limited.22
Tick-borne Encephalitis
Tick-borne encephalitis is caused by the flavivirus tick-borne encephalitis virus in Europe and Asia. The tick-borne encephalitis virus is transmitted by Ixodes ricinus in Europe and by Ixodes persulcatus in eastern Russia, China, and Japan. It also has been associated with consumption of unpasteurized milk.23,24
Tick-borne encephalitis presents in a biphasic pattern. The initial viremic phase can persist for as long as 8 days with headache, nausea, myalgia, and fever. One-third of patients then enter an asymptomatic phase, followed by virus penetration into the central nervous system. The neurologic phase produces continued headache and fever with photophobia, focal neurologic deficits, seizures, respiratory depression, or coma. Neurologic sequelae persist in 10% to 20% of patients.25,26
In the viremic stage, diagnosis is made with PCR or culture. During the latent phase or neurologic phase, serologic testing for tick-borne encephalitis virus antibodies is indicated. Neutralizing antibody evaluation may be necessary due to cross-reactivity among flaviviruses.27 Treatment is supportive. An inactivated vaccine is available for high-risk populations.28
Borrelia miyamotoi Disease
Borrelia miyamotoi is a symbiont of the Ixodes tick formerly believed to have no pathogenic significance; however, B miyamotoi was isolated in febrile patients in Russia in 20117 and was identified as a pathogen in both North America29 and Europe in 2013.30 Disease presentation includes nonspecific symptoms of fever, fatigue, headache, arthralgia, myalgia, and nausea. Rash is uncommon. Laboratory abnormalities include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and transaminitis.31,32 Meningoencephalitis may occur in immunocompromised patients.29,30
The diagnosis of B miyamotoi disease is confirmed by PCR or serology. An ELISA that is positive for B burgdorferi IgM but negative with confirmatory immunoblot suggests B miyamotoi disease. Seroconversion using a glpQ protein ELISA also can be assessed.31 If ELISA is positive, Lyme disease can be excluded because B burgdorferi does not possess g1pQ. Treatment is with doxycycline.32
Tick Paralysis
Tick paralysis is an intoxication with holocyclotoxin from the saliva of gravid hard ticks. In the United States, intoxication is associated with ticks of various species of Amblyomma, Dermacentor, and Ixodes in the Northwest, Southeast, and Northeast. In Australia, intoxication is associated with Ixodes.33 Patients present with weakness and fatigue, progressing to ascending flaccid paralysis with sensory sparing. The treatment is tick removal.8,33
Conclusion
Arthropods carry many regional pathogens. Physicians outside of those regions should seek a travel history and be alert for imported disease.
- Steere AC, Grodzicki RL, Kornblatt AN, et al. The spirochetal etiology of Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:733-740.
- Dolan MC, Hojgaard A, Hoxmeier JC, et al. Vector competence of the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis, for the recently recognized Lyme borreliosis spirochete Candidatus Borrelia mayonii. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016;7:665-669.
- Rudzinska MA, Spielman A, Riek RF, et al. Intraerythrocytic ‘gametocytes’ of Babesia microti and their maturation in ticks. Can J Zool. 1979;57:424-434.
- Casals J, Olitsky PK. Enduring immunity following vaccination of mice with formalin-inactivated virus of Russian spring-summer (Far Eastern, tick-borne) encephalitis; correlation with serum-neutralizing and complement-fixing antibodies. J Exp Med. 1945;82:431-443.
- Magnarelli LA, Stafford KC III, Mather TN, et al. Hemocytic rickettsia-like organisms in ticks: serologic reactivity with antisera to Ehrlichiae and detection of DNA of agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2710-2714.
- McLean DM, Donohue WL. Powassan virus: isolation of virus from a fatal case of encephalitis. Can Med Assoc J. 1959;80:708-711.
- Platonov AE, Karan LS, Kolyasnikova NM, et al. Humans infected with relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia miyamotoi, Russia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1816-1823.
- Diaz JH. A 60-year meta-analysis of tick paralysis in the United States: a predictable, preventable, and often misdiagnosed poisoning. J Med Toxicol. 2010;6:15-21.
- Bakken J, Dumler JS. Human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29:341-355.
- Chapman AS, Bakken JS, Folk SM, et al; Tickborne Rickettsial Diseases Working Group; CDC. Diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases: Rocky Mountain spotted fever, ehrlichioses, and anaplasmosis—United States: a practical guide for physicians and other health-care and public health professionals. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-4):1-27.
- Dahlgren FS, Mandel EJ, Krebs JW, et al. Increasing incidence of Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in the United States, 2000-2007. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;85:124-130.
- Aguero-Rosenfeld ME. Diagnosis of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis: state of the art. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2002;2:233-239.
- Vannier EG, Diuk-Wasser MA, Ben Mamoun C, et al. Babesiosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29:357-370.
- Joseph JT, Roy SS, Shams N, et al. Babesiosis in Lower Hudson Valley, New York, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:843-847.
- McQuiston JH, Childs JE, Chamberland ME, et al. Transmission of tickborne agents by blood transfusions: a review of known and potential risks in the United States. Transfusion. 2000;40:274-284.
- Hatcher JC, Greenberg PD, Antique J, et al. Severe babesiosis in Long Island: review of 34 cases and their complications. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:1117-1125.
- Healy GR, Ruebush TK. Morphology of Babesia microti in human blood smears. Am J Clin Pathol. 1980;73:107-109.
- Kowalski TJ, Jobe DA, Dolan EC, et al. The emergence of clinically relevant babesiosis in southwestern Wisconsin. WMJ. 2015;114:152-157.
- Krause PJ, Telford SR III, Spielman A, et al. Concurrent Lyme disease and babesiosis. evidence for increased severity and duration of illness. JAMA. 1996;275:1657-1660.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Statistics & maps. http://www.cdc.gov/powassan/statistics.html. Updated February 14, 2017. Accessed December 11, 2017.
- Piantadosi A, Rubin DB, McQuillen DP, et al. Emerging cases of Powassan virus encephalitis in New England: clinical presentation, imaging, and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:707-713.
- El Khoury MY, Camargo JF, White JL, et al. Potential role of deer tick virus in Powassan encephalitis cases in Lyme disease-endemic areas of New York, U.S.A. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:1926-1933.
- World Health Organization (WHO). Vaccines against tick-borne encephalitis: WHO position paper. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2011;86:241-256.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Tick-borne encephalitis among U.S. travelers to Europe and Asia—2000-2009. JAMA. 2010;303:2132-2135.
- Valarcher JF, Hägglund S, Juremalm M, et al. Tick-borne encephalitits. Rev Sci Tech. 2015;34:453-466.
- Schultze D, Dollenmaier G, Rohner A, et al. Benefit of detecting tick-borne encephalitis viremia in the first phase of illness. J Clin Virol. 2007;38:172-175.
- Holzmann H. Diagnosis of tick-borne encephalitis. Vaccine. 2003;21(suppl 1):S36-S40.
- Zavadska D, Anca I, André F, et al. Recommendations for tick-borne encephalitis vaccination from the Central European Vaccination Awareness Group. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013;9:362-374.
- Gugliotta JL, Goethert HK, Berardi VP, et al. Meningoencephalitis from Borrelia miyamotoi in an immunocompromised patient. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:240-245.
- Hovius JW, de Wever B, Sohne M, et al. A case of meningoencephalitis by the relapsing fever spirochaete Borrelia miyamotoi in Europe. Lancet. 2013;382:658.
- Molloy PJ, Telford SR III, Chowdri HR, et al. Borrelia miyamotoi disease in the northeastern United States: a case series. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:91-98.
- Telford SR 3rd, Goethert HK, Molloy PJ, et al. Borrelia miyamotoi disease: neither Lyme disease nor relapsing fever. Clin Lab Med. 2015;35:867-882.
- Diaz JH. A comparative meta-analysis of tick paralysis in the United States and Australia. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2015;53:874-883.
The Ixodes tick is prevalent in temperate climates worldwide. During a blood meal, pathogens may be transmitted from the tick to its host. Borrelia burgdorferi, a spirochete responsible for Lyme disease, is the most prevalent pathogen transmitted by Ixodes ticks.1 Borrelia mayonii recently was identified as an additional cause of Lyme disease in the United States.2
The Ixodes tick also is associated with several less common pathogens, including Babesia microti and the tick-borne encephalitis virus, which have been recognized as Ixodes-associated pathogens for many years.3,4 Other pathogens have been identified, including Anaplasma phagocytophilum, recognized in the 1990s as the cause of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, as well as the Powassan virus and Borrelia miyamotoi.5-7 Additionally, tick paralysis has been associated with toxins in the saliva of various species of several genera of ticks, including some Ixodes species.8 Due to an overlap in geographic distribution (Figure) and disease presentations (eTable), it is important that physicians be familiar with these regional pathogens transmitted by Ixodes ticks.
Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis
Formerly known as human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, human granulocytic anaplasmosis is caused by A phagocytophilum and is transmitted by Ixodes scapularis, Ixodes pacificus, and Ixodes persulcatus. The incidence of human granulocytic anaplasmosis in the United States increased 12-fold from 2001 to 2011.9
Presenting symptoms generally are nonspecific, including fever, night sweats, headache, myalgias, and arthralgias, often resulting in misdiagnosis as a viral infection. Laboratory abnormalities include mild transaminitis, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia.9,10 Although most infections resolve spontaneously, 3% of patients develop serious complications. The mortality rate is 0.6%.11
A diagnosis of human granulocytic anaplasmosis should be suspected in patients with a viral-like illness and exposure to ticks in an endemic area. The diagnosis can be confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), acute- and convalescent-phase serologic testing, or direct fluorescent antibody screening. Characteristic morulae may be present in granulocytes.12 Treatment typically includes doxycycline, which also covers B burgdorferi coinfection. When a diagnosis of human granulocytic anaplasmosis is suspected, treatment should never be delayed to await laboratory confirmation. If no clinical improvement is seen within 48 hours, alternate diagnoses or coinfection with B microti should be considered.10
Babesiosis
The protozoan B microti causes babesiosis in the United States, with Babesia divergens being more common in Europe.13 Reported cases of babesiosis in New York increased as much as 20-fold from 2001 to 2008.14 Transmission primarily is from the Ixodes tick but rarely can occur from blood transfusion.15 Tick attachment for at least 36 hours is required for transmission.13
The clinical presentation of babesiosis ranges from asymptomatic to fatal. Symptoms generally are nonspecific, resembling a viral infection and including headache, nausea, diarrhea, arthralgia, and myalgia. Laboratory evaluation may reveal hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, transaminitis, and elevated blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels.16 Rash is not typical. Resolution of symptoms generally occurs within 2 weeks of presentation, although anemia may persist for months.13 Severe disease is more common among elderly and immunocompromised patients. Complications include respiratory failure, renal failure, congestive heart failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. The mortality rate in the United States is approximately 10%.10,16
A diagnosis of babesiosis is made based on the presence of flulike symptoms, laboratory results, and history of recent travel to an endemic area. A thin blood smear allows identification of the organism in erythrocytes as ring forms or tetrads (a “Maltese cross” appearance).17 Polymerase chain reaction is more sensitive than a blood smear, especially in early disease.18 Indirect fluorescent antibody testing is species-specific but cannot verify active infection.10
Treatment of babesiosis is indicated for symptomatic patients with active infection. Positive serology alone is not an indication for treatment. Asymptomatic patients with positive serology should have diagnostic testing repeated in 3 months with subsequent treatment if parasitemia persists. Mild disease is treated with atovaquone plus azithromycin or clindamycin plus quinine. Severe babesiosis is treated with quinine and intravenous clindamycin and may require exchange transfusion.10 Coinfection with B burgdorferi should be considered in patients with flulike symptoms and erythema migrans or treatment failure. Coinfection is diagnosed by Lyme serology plus PCR for B microti. This is an important consideration because treatment of babesiosis does not eradicate B burgdorferi infection.19
Powassan Virus
Powassan virus is a flavivirus that causes encephalitis. It is transmitted by Ixodes cookei (Powassan virus, lineage I) in the Great Lakes region and by I scapularis (Powassan virus, lineage II, or deer tick virus) in the northeastern United States. Transmission can occur within 15 minutes of tick attachment.6,20,21
Patients typically present with fever, headache, altered mental status, seizures, and focal neurologic deficits. Gastrointestinal symptoms and rash also have been reported.21 The diagnosis is made based on clinical presentation and laboratory testing with PCR or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Cross-reactivity on ELISA exists, necessitating confirmation with a neutralizing antibody or PCR. Treatment is supportive. Corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin have been proposed as treatment modalities, but evidence of their efficacy is limited.22
Tick-borne Encephalitis
Tick-borne encephalitis is caused by the flavivirus tick-borne encephalitis virus in Europe and Asia. The tick-borne encephalitis virus is transmitted by Ixodes ricinus in Europe and by Ixodes persulcatus in eastern Russia, China, and Japan. It also has been associated with consumption of unpasteurized milk.23,24
Tick-borne encephalitis presents in a biphasic pattern. The initial viremic phase can persist for as long as 8 days with headache, nausea, myalgia, and fever. One-third of patients then enter an asymptomatic phase, followed by virus penetration into the central nervous system. The neurologic phase produces continued headache and fever with photophobia, focal neurologic deficits, seizures, respiratory depression, or coma. Neurologic sequelae persist in 10% to 20% of patients.25,26
In the viremic stage, diagnosis is made with PCR or culture. During the latent phase or neurologic phase, serologic testing for tick-borne encephalitis virus antibodies is indicated. Neutralizing antibody evaluation may be necessary due to cross-reactivity among flaviviruses.27 Treatment is supportive. An inactivated vaccine is available for high-risk populations.28
Borrelia miyamotoi Disease
Borrelia miyamotoi is a symbiont of the Ixodes tick formerly believed to have no pathogenic significance; however, B miyamotoi was isolated in febrile patients in Russia in 20117 and was identified as a pathogen in both North America29 and Europe in 2013.30 Disease presentation includes nonspecific symptoms of fever, fatigue, headache, arthralgia, myalgia, and nausea. Rash is uncommon. Laboratory abnormalities include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and transaminitis.31,32 Meningoencephalitis may occur in immunocompromised patients.29,30
The diagnosis of B miyamotoi disease is confirmed by PCR or serology. An ELISA that is positive for B burgdorferi IgM but negative with confirmatory immunoblot suggests B miyamotoi disease. Seroconversion using a glpQ protein ELISA also can be assessed.31 If ELISA is positive, Lyme disease can be excluded because B burgdorferi does not possess g1pQ. Treatment is with doxycycline.32
Tick Paralysis
Tick paralysis is an intoxication with holocyclotoxin from the saliva of gravid hard ticks. In the United States, intoxication is associated with ticks of various species of Amblyomma, Dermacentor, and Ixodes in the Northwest, Southeast, and Northeast. In Australia, intoxication is associated with Ixodes.33 Patients present with weakness and fatigue, progressing to ascending flaccid paralysis with sensory sparing. The treatment is tick removal.8,33
Conclusion
Arthropods carry many regional pathogens. Physicians outside of those regions should seek a travel history and be alert for imported disease.
The Ixodes tick is prevalent in temperate climates worldwide. During a blood meal, pathogens may be transmitted from the tick to its host. Borrelia burgdorferi, a spirochete responsible for Lyme disease, is the most prevalent pathogen transmitted by Ixodes ticks.1 Borrelia mayonii recently was identified as an additional cause of Lyme disease in the United States.2
The Ixodes tick also is associated with several less common pathogens, including Babesia microti and the tick-borne encephalitis virus, which have been recognized as Ixodes-associated pathogens for many years.3,4 Other pathogens have been identified, including Anaplasma phagocytophilum, recognized in the 1990s as the cause of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, as well as the Powassan virus and Borrelia miyamotoi.5-7 Additionally, tick paralysis has been associated with toxins in the saliva of various species of several genera of ticks, including some Ixodes species.8 Due to an overlap in geographic distribution (Figure) and disease presentations (eTable), it is important that physicians be familiar with these regional pathogens transmitted by Ixodes ticks.
Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis
Formerly known as human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, human granulocytic anaplasmosis is caused by A phagocytophilum and is transmitted by Ixodes scapularis, Ixodes pacificus, and Ixodes persulcatus. The incidence of human granulocytic anaplasmosis in the United States increased 12-fold from 2001 to 2011.9
Presenting symptoms generally are nonspecific, including fever, night sweats, headache, myalgias, and arthralgias, often resulting in misdiagnosis as a viral infection. Laboratory abnormalities include mild transaminitis, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia.9,10 Although most infections resolve spontaneously, 3% of patients develop serious complications. The mortality rate is 0.6%.11
A diagnosis of human granulocytic anaplasmosis should be suspected in patients with a viral-like illness and exposure to ticks in an endemic area. The diagnosis can be confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), acute- and convalescent-phase serologic testing, or direct fluorescent antibody screening. Characteristic morulae may be present in granulocytes.12 Treatment typically includes doxycycline, which also covers B burgdorferi coinfection. When a diagnosis of human granulocytic anaplasmosis is suspected, treatment should never be delayed to await laboratory confirmation. If no clinical improvement is seen within 48 hours, alternate diagnoses or coinfection with B microti should be considered.10
Babesiosis
The protozoan B microti causes babesiosis in the United States, with Babesia divergens being more common in Europe.13 Reported cases of babesiosis in New York increased as much as 20-fold from 2001 to 2008.14 Transmission primarily is from the Ixodes tick but rarely can occur from blood transfusion.15 Tick attachment for at least 36 hours is required for transmission.13
The clinical presentation of babesiosis ranges from asymptomatic to fatal. Symptoms generally are nonspecific, resembling a viral infection and including headache, nausea, diarrhea, arthralgia, and myalgia. Laboratory evaluation may reveal hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, transaminitis, and elevated blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels.16 Rash is not typical. Resolution of symptoms generally occurs within 2 weeks of presentation, although anemia may persist for months.13 Severe disease is more common among elderly and immunocompromised patients. Complications include respiratory failure, renal failure, congestive heart failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. The mortality rate in the United States is approximately 10%.10,16
A diagnosis of babesiosis is made based on the presence of flulike symptoms, laboratory results, and history of recent travel to an endemic area. A thin blood smear allows identification of the organism in erythrocytes as ring forms or tetrads (a “Maltese cross” appearance).17 Polymerase chain reaction is more sensitive than a blood smear, especially in early disease.18 Indirect fluorescent antibody testing is species-specific but cannot verify active infection.10
Treatment of babesiosis is indicated for symptomatic patients with active infection. Positive serology alone is not an indication for treatment. Asymptomatic patients with positive serology should have diagnostic testing repeated in 3 months with subsequent treatment if parasitemia persists. Mild disease is treated with atovaquone plus azithromycin or clindamycin plus quinine. Severe babesiosis is treated with quinine and intravenous clindamycin and may require exchange transfusion.10 Coinfection with B burgdorferi should be considered in patients with flulike symptoms and erythema migrans or treatment failure. Coinfection is diagnosed by Lyme serology plus PCR for B microti. This is an important consideration because treatment of babesiosis does not eradicate B burgdorferi infection.19
Powassan Virus
Powassan virus is a flavivirus that causes encephalitis. It is transmitted by Ixodes cookei (Powassan virus, lineage I) in the Great Lakes region and by I scapularis (Powassan virus, lineage II, or deer tick virus) in the northeastern United States. Transmission can occur within 15 minutes of tick attachment.6,20,21
Patients typically present with fever, headache, altered mental status, seizures, and focal neurologic deficits. Gastrointestinal symptoms and rash also have been reported.21 The diagnosis is made based on clinical presentation and laboratory testing with PCR or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Cross-reactivity on ELISA exists, necessitating confirmation with a neutralizing antibody or PCR. Treatment is supportive. Corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin have been proposed as treatment modalities, but evidence of their efficacy is limited.22
Tick-borne Encephalitis
Tick-borne encephalitis is caused by the flavivirus tick-borne encephalitis virus in Europe and Asia. The tick-borne encephalitis virus is transmitted by Ixodes ricinus in Europe and by Ixodes persulcatus in eastern Russia, China, and Japan. It also has been associated with consumption of unpasteurized milk.23,24
Tick-borne encephalitis presents in a biphasic pattern. The initial viremic phase can persist for as long as 8 days with headache, nausea, myalgia, and fever. One-third of patients then enter an asymptomatic phase, followed by virus penetration into the central nervous system. The neurologic phase produces continued headache and fever with photophobia, focal neurologic deficits, seizures, respiratory depression, or coma. Neurologic sequelae persist in 10% to 20% of patients.25,26
In the viremic stage, diagnosis is made with PCR or culture. During the latent phase or neurologic phase, serologic testing for tick-borne encephalitis virus antibodies is indicated. Neutralizing antibody evaluation may be necessary due to cross-reactivity among flaviviruses.27 Treatment is supportive. An inactivated vaccine is available for high-risk populations.28
Borrelia miyamotoi Disease
Borrelia miyamotoi is a symbiont of the Ixodes tick formerly believed to have no pathogenic significance; however, B miyamotoi was isolated in febrile patients in Russia in 20117 and was identified as a pathogen in both North America29 and Europe in 2013.30 Disease presentation includes nonspecific symptoms of fever, fatigue, headache, arthralgia, myalgia, and nausea. Rash is uncommon. Laboratory abnormalities include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and transaminitis.31,32 Meningoencephalitis may occur in immunocompromised patients.29,30
The diagnosis of B miyamotoi disease is confirmed by PCR or serology. An ELISA that is positive for B burgdorferi IgM but negative with confirmatory immunoblot suggests B miyamotoi disease. Seroconversion using a glpQ protein ELISA also can be assessed.31 If ELISA is positive, Lyme disease can be excluded because B burgdorferi does not possess g1pQ. Treatment is with doxycycline.32
Tick Paralysis
Tick paralysis is an intoxication with holocyclotoxin from the saliva of gravid hard ticks. In the United States, intoxication is associated with ticks of various species of Amblyomma, Dermacentor, and Ixodes in the Northwest, Southeast, and Northeast. In Australia, intoxication is associated with Ixodes.33 Patients present with weakness and fatigue, progressing to ascending flaccid paralysis with sensory sparing. The treatment is tick removal.8,33
Conclusion
Arthropods carry many regional pathogens. Physicians outside of those regions should seek a travel history and be alert for imported disease.
- Steere AC, Grodzicki RL, Kornblatt AN, et al. The spirochetal etiology of Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:733-740.
- Dolan MC, Hojgaard A, Hoxmeier JC, et al. Vector competence of the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis, for the recently recognized Lyme borreliosis spirochete Candidatus Borrelia mayonii. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016;7:665-669.
- Rudzinska MA, Spielman A, Riek RF, et al. Intraerythrocytic ‘gametocytes’ of Babesia microti and their maturation in ticks. Can J Zool. 1979;57:424-434.
- Casals J, Olitsky PK. Enduring immunity following vaccination of mice with formalin-inactivated virus of Russian spring-summer (Far Eastern, tick-borne) encephalitis; correlation with serum-neutralizing and complement-fixing antibodies. J Exp Med. 1945;82:431-443.
- Magnarelli LA, Stafford KC III, Mather TN, et al. Hemocytic rickettsia-like organisms in ticks: serologic reactivity with antisera to Ehrlichiae and detection of DNA of agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2710-2714.
- McLean DM, Donohue WL. Powassan virus: isolation of virus from a fatal case of encephalitis. Can Med Assoc J. 1959;80:708-711.
- Platonov AE, Karan LS, Kolyasnikova NM, et al. Humans infected with relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia miyamotoi, Russia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1816-1823.
- Diaz JH. A 60-year meta-analysis of tick paralysis in the United States: a predictable, preventable, and often misdiagnosed poisoning. J Med Toxicol. 2010;6:15-21.
- Bakken J, Dumler JS. Human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29:341-355.
- Chapman AS, Bakken JS, Folk SM, et al; Tickborne Rickettsial Diseases Working Group; CDC. Diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases: Rocky Mountain spotted fever, ehrlichioses, and anaplasmosis—United States: a practical guide for physicians and other health-care and public health professionals. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-4):1-27.
- Dahlgren FS, Mandel EJ, Krebs JW, et al. Increasing incidence of Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in the United States, 2000-2007. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;85:124-130.
- Aguero-Rosenfeld ME. Diagnosis of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis: state of the art. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2002;2:233-239.
- Vannier EG, Diuk-Wasser MA, Ben Mamoun C, et al. Babesiosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29:357-370.
- Joseph JT, Roy SS, Shams N, et al. Babesiosis in Lower Hudson Valley, New York, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:843-847.
- McQuiston JH, Childs JE, Chamberland ME, et al. Transmission of tickborne agents by blood transfusions: a review of known and potential risks in the United States. Transfusion. 2000;40:274-284.
- Hatcher JC, Greenberg PD, Antique J, et al. Severe babesiosis in Long Island: review of 34 cases and their complications. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:1117-1125.
- Healy GR, Ruebush TK. Morphology of Babesia microti in human blood smears. Am J Clin Pathol. 1980;73:107-109.
- Kowalski TJ, Jobe DA, Dolan EC, et al. The emergence of clinically relevant babesiosis in southwestern Wisconsin. WMJ. 2015;114:152-157.
- Krause PJ, Telford SR III, Spielman A, et al. Concurrent Lyme disease and babesiosis. evidence for increased severity and duration of illness. JAMA. 1996;275:1657-1660.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Statistics & maps. http://www.cdc.gov/powassan/statistics.html. Updated February 14, 2017. Accessed December 11, 2017.
- Piantadosi A, Rubin DB, McQuillen DP, et al. Emerging cases of Powassan virus encephalitis in New England: clinical presentation, imaging, and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:707-713.
- El Khoury MY, Camargo JF, White JL, et al. Potential role of deer tick virus in Powassan encephalitis cases in Lyme disease-endemic areas of New York, U.S.A. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:1926-1933.
- World Health Organization (WHO). Vaccines against tick-borne encephalitis: WHO position paper. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2011;86:241-256.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Tick-borne encephalitis among U.S. travelers to Europe and Asia—2000-2009. JAMA. 2010;303:2132-2135.
- Valarcher JF, Hägglund S, Juremalm M, et al. Tick-borne encephalitits. Rev Sci Tech. 2015;34:453-466.
- Schultze D, Dollenmaier G, Rohner A, et al. Benefit of detecting tick-borne encephalitis viremia in the first phase of illness. J Clin Virol. 2007;38:172-175.
- Holzmann H. Diagnosis of tick-borne encephalitis. Vaccine. 2003;21(suppl 1):S36-S40.
- Zavadska D, Anca I, André F, et al. Recommendations for tick-borne encephalitis vaccination from the Central European Vaccination Awareness Group. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013;9:362-374.
- Gugliotta JL, Goethert HK, Berardi VP, et al. Meningoencephalitis from Borrelia miyamotoi in an immunocompromised patient. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:240-245.
- Hovius JW, de Wever B, Sohne M, et al. A case of meningoencephalitis by the relapsing fever spirochaete Borrelia miyamotoi in Europe. Lancet. 2013;382:658.
- Molloy PJ, Telford SR III, Chowdri HR, et al. Borrelia miyamotoi disease in the northeastern United States: a case series. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:91-98.
- Telford SR 3rd, Goethert HK, Molloy PJ, et al. Borrelia miyamotoi disease: neither Lyme disease nor relapsing fever. Clin Lab Med. 2015;35:867-882.
- Diaz JH. A comparative meta-analysis of tick paralysis in the United States and Australia. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2015;53:874-883.
- Steere AC, Grodzicki RL, Kornblatt AN, et al. The spirochetal etiology of Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:733-740.
- Dolan MC, Hojgaard A, Hoxmeier JC, et al. Vector competence of the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis, for the recently recognized Lyme borreliosis spirochete Candidatus Borrelia mayonii. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016;7:665-669.
- Rudzinska MA, Spielman A, Riek RF, et al. Intraerythrocytic ‘gametocytes’ of Babesia microti and their maturation in ticks. Can J Zool. 1979;57:424-434.
- Casals J, Olitsky PK. Enduring immunity following vaccination of mice with formalin-inactivated virus of Russian spring-summer (Far Eastern, tick-borne) encephalitis; correlation with serum-neutralizing and complement-fixing antibodies. J Exp Med. 1945;82:431-443.
- Magnarelli LA, Stafford KC III, Mather TN, et al. Hemocytic rickettsia-like organisms in ticks: serologic reactivity with antisera to Ehrlichiae and detection of DNA of agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2710-2714.
- McLean DM, Donohue WL. Powassan virus: isolation of virus from a fatal case of encephalitis. Can Med Assoc J. 1959;80:708-711.
- Platonov AE, Karan LS, Kolyasnikova NM, et al. Humans infected with relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia miyamotoi, Russia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1816-1823.
- Diaz JH. A 60-year meta-analysis of tick paralysis in the United States: a predictable, preventable, and often misdiagnosed poisoning. J Med Toxicol. 2010;6:15-21.
- Bakken J, Dumler JS. Human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29:341-355.
- Chapman AS, Bakken JS, Folk SM, et al; Tickborne Rickettsial Diseases Working Group; CDC. Diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases: Rocky Mountain spotted fever, ehrlichioses, and anaplasmosis—United States: a practical guide for physicians and other health-care and public health professionals. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-4):1-27.
- Dahlgren FS, Mandel EJ, Krebs JW, et al. Increasing incidence of Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in the United States, 2000-2007. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;85:124-130.
- Aguero-Rosenfeld ME. Diagnosis of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis: state of the art. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2002;2:233-239.
- Vannier EG, Diuk-Wasser MA, Ben Mamoun C, et al. Babesiosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29:357-370.
- Joseph JT, Roy SS, Shams N, et al. Babesiosis in Lower Hudson Valley, New York, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:843-847.
- McQuiston JH, Childs JE, Chamberland ME, et al. Transmission of tickborne agents by blood transfusions: a review of known and potential risks in the United States. Transfusion. 2000;40:274-284.
- Hatcher JC, Greenberg PD, Antique J, et al. Severe babesiosis in Long Island: review of 34 cases and their complications. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:1117-1125.
- Healy GR, Ruebush TK. Morphology of Babesia microti in human blood smears. Am J Clin Pathol. 1980;73:107-109.
- Kowalski TJ, Jobe DA, Dolan EC, et al. The emergence of clinically relevant babesiosis in southwestern Wisconsin. WMJ. 2015;114:152-157.
- Krause PJ, Telford SR III, Spielman A, et al. Concurrent Lyme disease and babesiosis. evidence for increased severity and duration of illness. JAMA. 1996;275:1657-1660.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Statistics & maps. http://www.cdc.gov/powassan/statistics.html. Updated February 14, 2017. Accessed December 11, 2017.
- Piantadosi A, Rubin DB, McQuillen DP, et al. Emerging cases of Powassan virus encephalitis in New England: clinical presentation, imaging, and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:707-713.
- El Khoury MY, Camargo JF, White JL, et al. Potential role of deer tick virus in Powassan encephalitis cases in Lyme disease-endemic areas of New York, U.S.A. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:1926-1933.
- World Health Organization (WHO). Vaccines against tick-borne encephalitis: WHO position paper. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2011;86:241-256.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Tick-borne encephalitis among U.S. travelers to Europe and Asia—2000-2009. JAMA. 2010;303:2132-2135.
- Valarcher JF, Hägglund S, Juremalm M, et al. Tick-borne encephalitits. Rev Sci Tech. 2015;34:453-466.
- Schultze D, Dollenmaier G, Rohner A, et al. Benefit of detecting tick-borne encephalitis viremia in the first phase of illness. J Clin Virol. 2007;38:172-175.
- Holzmann H. Diagnosis of tick-borne encephalitis. Vaccine. 2003;21(suppl 1):S36-S40.
- Zavadska D, Anca I, André F, et al. Recommendations for tick-borne encephalitis vaccination from the Central European Vaccination Awareness Group. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013;9:362-374.
- Gugliotta JL, Goethert HK, Berardi VP, et al. Meningoencephalitis from Borrelia miyamotoi in an immunocompromised patient. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:240-245.
- Hovius JW, de Wever B, Sohne M, et al. A case of meningoencephalitis by the relapsing fever spirochaete Borrelia miyamotoi in Europe. Lancet. 2013;382:658.
- Molloy PJ, Telford SR III, Chowdri HR, et al. Borrelia miyamotoi disease in the northeastern United States: a case series. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:91-98.
- Telford SR 3rd, Goethert HK, Molloy PJ, et al. Borrelia miyamotoi disease: neither Lyme disease nor relapsing fever. Clin Lab Med. 2015;35:867-882.
- Diaz JH. A comparative meta-analysis of tick paralysis in the United States and Australia. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2015;53:874-883.
Practice Points
- Apart from the more familiar Borrelia burgdorferi, several less common pathogens associated with diseases transmitted by Ixodes ticks include Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Babesia microti, Borrelia miyamotoi, the Powassan virus, and the tick-borne encephalitis virus.
- Overlap in both the geographic distribution and the clinical presentations of these uncommon pathogens underscores the importance of being familiar with their capacity for causing illness and effective treatment.
- Intoxication with the saliva of some Ixodes species can cause an ascending flaccid tick paralysis.
What’s Eating You? Ixodes Tick and Related Diseases, Part 1: Life Cycle, Local Reactions, and Lyme Disease
Ticks are ectoparasitic hemophages that feed on mammals, reptiles, and birds. The Ixodidae family comprises the hard ticks. A hard dorsal plate, scutum, and capitulum that extends outward from the body are features that distinguish the hard tick. 1Ixodes is the largest genus of hard ticks, with more than 250 species localized in temperate climates.2 It has an inornate scutum and lacks festoons (Figure 1).1 The Ixodes ricinus species complex accounts for most species relevant to the spread of human disease (Figure 2), with Ixodes scapularis in the northeastern, north midwestern, and southern United States; Ixodes pacificus in western United States; I ricinus in Europe and North Africa; and Ixodes persulcatus in Russia and Asia. Ixodes holocyclus is endemic to Australia.3,4
Life Cycle
Ixodes species progress through 4 life stages—egg, larvae, nymph, and adult—during their 3-host life cycle. Lifespan is 2 to 6 years, varying with environmental factors. A blood meal is required between each stage. Female ticks have a small scutum, allowing the abdomen to engorge during meals (Figure 3).
Larvae hatch in the early summer and remain dormant until the spring, emerging as a nymph. Following a blood meal, the nymph molts and reemerges as an adult in autumn. During autumn and winter, the female lays as many as 2000 eggs that emerge in early summer.5 Nymphs are small and easily undetected for the duration required for pathogen transmission, making nymphs the stage most likely to transmit disease.6
The majority of tick-borne diseases present from May to July, corresponding to nymph activity. Fewer cases present in the autumn and early spring because the adult female feeds during cooler months.7
Larvae have 6 legs and are about the size of a sesame seed when engorged. Nymphs are slightly larger with 8 legs. Adults are largest and have 8 legs. Following a blood meal, the tick becomes engorged, increasing in size and lightening in color (Figure 3).1
Ticks are found in low-lying shrubs and tall grass as well as on the forest floor. They search for a host by detecting CO2, warmth, the smell of sweat, and the color white, prompting attachment.8 Habitats hospitable to Ixodes have expanded in the wake of climate, environmental, and socioeconomic changes, potentially contributing to the increasing incidence and expansion of zoonoses associated with this vector.9,10
Local Reactions
A tick bite may induce local hypersensitivity, leading to a red papule or plaque at the bite site, followed by swelling, warmth, and erythema. A cellular immune reaction induces induration and pruritus. Hard ticks are less likely than soft ticks to cause a serious local reaction.11,12
A variety of clinical and histologic features are observed following an arthropod bite. Histologically, acute tick bites show a neutrophilic infiltrate with fibrin deposition. Chronic reactions demonstrate a wedge-shaped, mixed infiltrate with prominent endothelial swelling. Eosinophilic cellulitis, or Wells syndrome, reveals tissue eosinophilia and flame figures.13 Tick mouthparts may be identified in the tissue. B-cell hyperplasia is seen in Borrelia lymphocytoma and is more common in Europe, presenting as erythematous to plum–colored nodules on the ear and areola.14
Lyme Disease
Disease manifestations vary by location. Lyme disease is associated with Borrelia burgdorferi and the recently identified Borrelia mayonii in the United States15; in Europe and Asia, acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans is associated with Borrelia afzelii and neuroborreliosis, with Borrelia garinii. Lyme disease is the most common tick-borne illness in the United States.16 The I ricinus species complex is the most common vector harboring Borrelia species.17 At least 36 hours of tick adherence is required for disease transmission.18 The incubation period is 3 to 20 days (median, 12 days).19
Clinical Findings
Erythema migrans is the most characteristic sign, seen in 80% of cases of Lyme disease. The typical rash is a centrifugally spreading, erythematous, annular patch with central clearing at the site of the tick bite.20 Atypical rashes include vesicular, indurated, ulcerated, and follicular variants.21 Histopathology commonly shows a superficial and deep perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate with plasma cells, histiocytes, and eosinophils.22 Typically, the rash resolves in 3 to 5 weeks.18
Early disseminated Lyme disease can present with any of the following findings: multiple erythema migrans; neurologic involvement, including cranial nerve palsy and meningitis; and Lyme carditis, which may result in atrioventricular block.23,24 Late findings include arthritis, encephalopathy, and polyneuropathy. A late cutaneous manifestation, acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans, is rare in the United States but occurs in as many as 10% of Lyme disease cases in Europe. An initial inflammatory response manifests as blue-red erythema and edema of the extensor surfaces of the extremities, commonly on the dorsal hands, feet, elbows, and knees. Firm fibrotic nodules may develop later over the olecranon and patella.23,24
The term chronic Lyme disease has been used to describe the persistence of symptoms after treatment; however, large clinical trials have not detected a difference in symptom frequency between patients with a history of Lyme disease and matched controls.25,26 Many patients with chronic Lyme disease may instead have posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome, described as nonspecific symptoms including fatigue, arthralgia, and decreased mental acuity following treatment of confirmed Lyme disease. Symptoms generally improve within 1 year.27
Laboratory Testing
The gold standard for laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease is 2-tiered serologic testing. First, an enzyme immunoassay or immunofluorescence assay is used to screen for antibodies. A Western blot follows if the result of the screen is positive or equivocal. Western blot testing for IgM and IgG is used when illness duration is less than 4 weeks; after 4 weeks, a Western blot for IgG alone is sufficient.27,28 The 2-tiered test has 99% specificity. Sensitivity increases with duration of disease (29%–40% with erythema migrans; 42%–87% in early disseminated disease; 97%–100% in late disease).29,30 A false-positive result can occur in the presence of infectious mononucleosis, an autoimmune disorder, and syphilis. If serologic testing is negative and suspicion remains high, testing should be repeated in 2 to 4 weeks.31 When a patient in a Lyme-endemic area presents with typical erythema migrans, serologic testing is unnecessary prior to treatment.32
Management
Treatment of Lyme disease centers on antibiotic therapy (Table). First-line treatment of early disseminated disease is doxycycline for 14 days (range, 10–21 days).27 In pregnant women, children younger than 8 years, and tetracycline-allergic patients, amoxicillin or cefuroxime axetil for 14 days (range, 14–21 days) may be used.33 For erythema migrans without complications, doxycycline for 10 days is effective. Complications that require hospitalization are treated with intravenous ceftriaxone.27 Re-treatment in patients with posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome is not recommended.34 Prophylaxis with a single dose of doxycycline 200 mg may be indicated when all of the following conditions are met: (1) the patient is in an area where more than 20% of Ixodes ticks are infected with B burgdorferi, (2) the attached tick is I scapularis, (3) the tick has been attached for more than 36 hours, and (4) treatment is begun within 72 hours of tick removal.27
- Anderson JF, Magnarelli LA. Biology of ticks. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2008;22:195-215.
- Jongejan F, Uilenberg G. The global importance of ticks. Parasitology. 2004;129(suppl):S3-S14.
- Xu G, Fang QQ, Keirans JE, et al. Molecular phylogenetic analyses indicate that the Ixodes ricinus complex is a paraphyletic group. J Parasitol. 2003;89:452-457.
- Swanson SJ, Neitzel D, Reed DK, et al. Coinfections acquired from Ixodes ticks. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:708-727.
- Mathison BA, Pritt BS. Laboratory identification of arthropod ectoparasites. Clin Microbol Rev. 2014;27:48-67.
- Falco RC, Fish D, Piesman J. Duration of tick bites in a Lyme disease-endemic area. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143:187-192.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lyme disease graphs. http://www.cdc.gov/lyme/stats/graphs.html. Updated November 21, 2016. Accessed November 21, 2017.
- Randolph SE. The impact of tick ecology on pathogen transmission dynamics. In: Bowman AS, Nuttall PA, eds. Ticks: Biology, Disease and Control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2008:40-72.
- Ostfeld RS, Brunner JL. Climate change and Ixodes tick-borne diseases of humans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370. pii:20140051. doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0051.
- Medlock JM, Hansford KM, Bormane A, et al. Driving forces for changes in geographical distribution of Ixodes ricinus ticks in Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:1.
- McGinley-Smith DE, Tsao SS. Dermatoses from ticks. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:393-396.
- Middleton DB. Tick-borne infections. What starts as a tiny bite may have a serious outcome. Postgrad Med. 1994;95:131-139.
- Melski JW. Wells’ syndrome, insect bites, and eosinophils. Dermatol Clin. 2015;8:287-293.
- Castelli E, Caputo V, Morello V, et al. Local reactions to tick bites. Am J Dermatopathol. 2008;30:241-248.
- Pritt BS, Mead PS, Johnson DK, et al. Identification of a novel pathogenic Borrelia species causing Lyme borreliosis with unusually high spirochaetaemia: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:556-564.
- Orloski KA, Hayes EB, Campbell GL, et al. Surveillance for Lyme disease—United States, 1992-1998. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000;49:1-11.
- Gray JS. The ecology of ticks transmitting Lyme borreliosis. Exp Appl Acarol. 1998;22:249-258.
- Piesman J, Mather TN, Sinsky RJ, et al. Duration of tick attachment and Borrelia burgdorferi transmission. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:557-558.
- Richardson M, Elliman D, Maguire H, et al. Evidence base of incubation periods, periods of infectiousness and exclusion policies for the control of communicable diseases in schools and preschools. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001;20:380-391.
- Myers SA, Sexton DJ. Dermatologic manifestations of arthropod-borne diseases. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1994;8:689-712.
- Ducroux E, Debarbieux S, Boibieux A, et al. Follicular borreliosis: an atypical presentation of erythema chronicum migrans. Dermatology. 2009;219:84-85.
- Miraflor AP, Seidel GD, Perry AE, et al. The many masks of cutaneous Lyme disease. J Cutan Pathol. 2016:43:32-40.
- Lenormand C, Jaulhac B, Debarbieux S, et al. Expanding the clinicopathological spectrum of late cutaneous Lyme borreliosis (acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans): a prospective study of 20 culture and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) documented cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:685-692.
- Zajkowska J, Czupryna P, Pancewicz SA, et al. Acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11:800.
- Seltzer EG, Gerber MA, Cartter ML, et al. Long-term outcomes of persons with Lyme disease. JAMA. 2000;283:609-616.
- Shadick NA, Phillips CB, Sangha O, et al. Musculoskeletal and neurologic outcomes in patients with previously treated Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:919-926.
- Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED, et al. The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:1089-1134.
- Schriefer ME. Lyme disease diagnosis: serology. Clin Lab Med. 2015;35:797-814.
- Wormser GP, Nowakowski J, Nadelman RB, et al. Impact of clinical variables on Borrelia burgdorferi-specific antibody seropositivity in acute-phase sera from patients in North America with culture-confirmed early Lyme disease. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008;15:1519-1522.
- Leeflang MM, Ang CW, Berkhout J, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for Lyme borreliosis in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:140.
- Sanchez E, Vannier E, Wormser GP, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: a review. JAMA. 2016;315:1767-1777.
- Lantos PM, Brinkerhoff RJ, Wormser GP, et al. Empiric antibiotic treatment of erythema migrans-like skin lesions as a function of geography: a clinical and cost effectiveness modeling study. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013;13:877-883.
- Smith GN, Gemmill I, Moore KM. Management of tick bites and Lyme disease during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34:1087-1091.
- Berende A, ter Hofstede HJ, Vos FJ, et al. Randomized trial of longer-term therapy for symptoms attributed to Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1209-1220.
Ticks are ectoparasitic hemophages that feed on mammals, reptiles, and birds. The Ixodidae family comprises the hard ticks. A hard dorsal plate, scutum, and capitulum that extends outward from the body are features that distinguish the hard tick. 1Ixodes is the largest genus of hard ticks, with more than 250 species localized in temperate climates.2 It has an inornate scutum and lacks festoons (Figure 1).1 The Ixodes ricinus species complex accounts for most species relevant to the spread of human disease (Figure 2), with Ixodes scapularis in the northeastern, north midwestern, and southern United States; Ixodes pacificus in western United States; I ricinus in Europe and North Africa; and Ixodes persulcatus in Russia and Asia. Ixodes holocyclus is endemic to Australia.3,4
Life Cycle
Ixodes species progress through 4 life stages—egg, larvae, nymph, and adult—during their 3-host life cycle. Lifespan is 2 to 6 years, varying with environmental factors. A blood meal is required between each stage. Female ticks have a small scutum, allowing the abdomen to engorge during meals (Figure 3).
Larvae hatch in the early summer and remain dormant until the spring, emerging as a nymph. Following a blood meal, the nymph molts and reemerges as an adult in autumn. During autumn and winter, the female lays as many as 2000 eggs that emerge in early summer.5 Nymphs are small and easily undetected for the duration required for pathogen transmission, making nymphs the stage most likely to transmit disease.6
The majority of tick-borne diseases present from May to July, corresponding to nymph activity. Fewer cases present in the autumn and early spring because the adult female feeds during cooler months.7
Larvae have 6 legs and are about the size of a sesame seed when engorged. Nymphs are slightly larger with 8 legs. Adults are largest and have 8 legs. Following a blood meal, the tick becomes engorged, increasing in size and lightening in color (Figure 3).1
Ticks are found in low-lying shrubs and tall grass as well as on the forest floor. They search for a host by detecting CO2, warmth, the smell of sweat, and the color white, prompting attachment.8 Habitats hospitable to Ixodes have expanded in the wake of climate, environmental, and socioeconomic changes, potentially contributing to the increasing incidence and expansion of zoonoses associated with this vector.9,10
Local Reactions
A tick bite may induce local hypersensitivity, leading to a red papule or plaque at the bite site, followed by swelling, warmth, and erythema. A cellular immune reaction induces induration and pruritus. Hard ticks are less likely than soft ticks to cause a serious local reaction.11,12
A variety of clinical and histologic features are observed following an arthropod bite. Histologically, acute tick bites show a neutrophilic infiltrate with fibrin deposition. Chronic reactions demonstrate a wedge-shaped, mixed infiltrate with prominent endothelial swelling. Eosinophilic cellulitis, or Wells syndrome, reveals tissue eosinophilia and flame figures.13 Tick mouthparts may be identified in the tissue. B-cell hyperplasia is seen in Borrelia lymphocytoma and is more common in Europe, presenting as erythematous to plum–colored nodules on the ear and areola.14
Lyme Disease
Disease manifestations vary by location. Lyme disease is associated with Borrelia burgdorferi and the recently identified Borrelia mayonii in the United States15; in Europe and Asia, acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans is associated with Borrelia afzelii and neuroborreliosis, with Borrelia garinii. Lyme disease is the most common tick-borne illness in the United States.16 The I ricinus species complex is the most common vector harboring Borrelia species.17 At least 36 hours of tick adherence is required for disease transmission.18 The incubation period is 3 to 20 days (median, 12 days).19
Clinical Findings
Erythema migrans is the most characteristic sign, seen in 80% of cases of Lyme disease. The typical rash is a centrifugally spreading, erythematous, annular patch with central clearing at the site of the tick bite.20 Atypical rashes include vesicular, indurated, ulcerated, and follicular variants.21 Histopathology commonly shows a superficial and deep perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate with plasma cells, histiocytes, and eosinophils.22 Typically, the rash resolves in 3 to 5 weeks.18
Early disseminated Lyme disease can present with any of the following findings: multiple erythema migrans; neurologic involvement, including cranial nerve palsy and meningitis; and Lyme carditis, which may result in atrioventricular block.23,24 Late findings include arthritis, encephalopathy, and polyneuropathy. A late cutaneous manifestation, acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans, is rare in the United States but occurs in as many as 10% of Lyme disease cases in Europe. An initial inflammatory response manifests as blue-red erythema and edema of the extensor surfaces of the extremities, commonly on the dorsal hands, feet, elbows, and knees. Firm fibrotic nodules may develop later over the olecranon and patella.23,24
The term chronic Lyme disease has been used to describe the persistence of symptoms after treatment; however, large clinical trials have not detected a difference in symptom frequency between patients with a history of Lyme disease and matched controls.25,26 Many patients with chronic Lyme disease may instead have posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome, described as nonspecific symptoms including fatigue, arthralgia, and decreased mental acuity following treatment of confirmed Lyme disease. Symptoms generally improve within 1 year.27
Laboratory Testing
The gold standard for laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease is 2-tiered serologic testing. First, an enzyme immunoassay or immunofluorescence assay is used to screen for antibodies. A Western blot follows if the result of the screen is positive or equivocal. Western blot testing for IgM and IgG is used when illness duration is less than 4 weeks; after 4 weeks, a Western blot for IgG alone is sufficient.27,28 The 2-tiered test has 99% specificity. Sensitivity increases with duration of disease (29%–40% with erythema migrans; 42%–87% in early disseminated disease; 97%–100% in late disease).29,30 A false-positive result can occur in the presence of infectious mononucleosis, an autoimmune disorder, and syphilis. If serologic testing is negative and suspicion remains high, testing should be repeated in 2 to 4 weeks.31 When a patient in a Lyme-endemic area presents with typical erythema migrans, serologic testing is unnecessary prior to treatment.32
Management
Treatment of Lyme disease centers on antibiotic therapy (Table). First-line treatment of early disseminated disease is doxycycline for 14 days (range, 10–21 days).27 In pregnant women, children younger than 8 years, and tetracycline-allergic patients, amoxicillin or cefuroxime axetil for 14 days (range, 14–21 days) may be used.33 For erythema migrans without complications, doxycycline for 10 days is effective. Complications that require hospitalization are treated with intravenous ceftriaxone.27 Re-treatment in patients with posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome is not recommended.34 Prophylaxis with a single dose of doxycycline 200 mg may be indicated when all of the following conditions are met: (1) the patient is in an area where more than 20% of Ixodes ticks are infected with B burgdorferi, (2) the attached tick is I scapularis, (3) the tick has been attached for more than 36 hours, and (4) treatment is begun within 72 hours of tick removal.27
Ticks are ectoparasitic hemophages that feed on mammals, reptiles, and birds. The Ixodidae family comprises the hard ticks. A hard dorsal plate, scutum, and capitulum that extends outward from the body are features that distinguish the hard tick. 1Ixodes is the largest genus of hard ticks, with more than 250 species localized in temperate climates.2 It has an inornate scutum and lacks festoons (Figure 1).1 The Ixodes ricinus species complex accounts for most species relevant to the spread of human disease (Figure 2), with Ixodes scapularis in the northeastern, north midwestern, and southern United States; Ixodes pacificus in western United States; I ricinus in Europe and North Africa; and Ixodes persulcatus in Russia and Asia. Ixodes holocyclus is endemic to Australia.3,4
Life Cycle
Ixodes species progress through 4 life stages—egg, larvae, nymph, and adult—during their 3-host life cycle. Lifespan is 2 to 6 years, varying with environmental factors. A blood meal is required between each stage. Female ticks have a small scutum, allowing the abdomen to engorge during meals (Figure 3).
Larvae hatch in the early summer and remain dormant until the spring, emerging as a nymph. Following a blood meal, the nymph molts and reemerges as an adult in autumn. During autumn and winter, the female lays as many as 2000 eggs that emerge in early summer.5 Nymphs are small and easily undetected for the duration required for pathogen transmission, making nymphs the stage most likely to transmit disease.6
The majority of tick-borne diseases present from May to July, corresponding to nymph activity. Fewer cases present in the autumn and early spring because the adult female feeds during cooler months.7
Larvae have 6 legs and are about the size of a sesame seed when engorged. Nymphs are slightly larger with 8 legs. Adults are largest and have 8 legs. Following a blood meal, the tick becomes engorged, increasing in size and lightening in color (Figure 3).1
Ticks are found in low-lying shrubs and tall grass as well as on the forest floor. They search for a host by detecting CO2, warmth, the smell of sweat, and the color white, prompting attachment.8 Habitats hospitable to Ixodes have expanded in the wake of climate, environmental, and socioeconomic changes, potentially contributing to the increasing incidence and expansion of zoonoses associated with this vector.9,10
Local Reactions
A tick bite may induce local hypersensitivity, leading to a red papule or plaque at the bite site, followed by swelling, warmth, and erythema. A cellular immune reaction induces induration and pruritus. Hard ticks are less likely than soft ticks to cause a serious local reaction.11,12
A variety of clinical and histologic features are observed following an arthropod bite. Histologically, acute tick bites show a neutrophilic infiltrate with fibrin deposition. Chronic reactions demonstrate a wedge-shaped, mixed infiltrate with prominent endothelial swelling. Eosinophilic cellulitis, or Wells syndrome, reveals tissue eosinophilia and flame figures.13 Tick mouthparts may be identified in the tissue. B-cell hyperplasia is seen in Borrelia lymphocytoma and is more common in Europe, presenting as erythematous to plum–colored nodules on the ear and areola.14
Lyme Disease
Disease manifestations vary by location. Lyme disease is associated with Borrelia burgdorferi and the recently identified Borrelia mayonii in the United States15; in Europe and Asia, acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans is associated with Borrelia afzelii and neuroborreliosis, with Borrelia garinii. Lyme disease is the most common tick-borne illness in the United States.16 The I ricinus species complex is the most common vector harboring Borrelia species.17 At least 36 hours of tick adherence is required for disease transmission.18 The incubation period is 3 to 20 days (median, 12 days).19
Clinical Findings
Erythema migrans is the most characteristic sign, seen in 80% of cases of Lyme disease. The typical rash is a centrifugally spreading, erythematous, annular patch with central clearing at the site of the tick bite.20 Atypical rashes include vesicular, indurated, ulcerated, and follicular variants.21 Histopathology commonly shows a superficial and deep perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate with plasma cells, histiocytes, and eosinophils.22 Typically, the rash resolves in 3 to 5 weeks.18
Early disseminated Lyme disease can present with any of the following findings: multiple erythema migrans; neurologic involvement, including cranial nerve palsy and meningitis; and Lyme carditis, which may result in atrioventricular block.23,24 Late findings include arthritis, encephalopathy, and polyneuropathy. A late cutaneous manifestation, acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans, is rare in the United States but occurs in as many as 10% of Lyme disease cases in Europe. An initial inflammatory response manifests as blue-red erythema and edema of the extensor surfaces of the extremities, commonly on the dorsal hands, feet, elbows, and knees. Firm fibrotic nodules may develop later over the olecranon and patella.23,24
The term chronic Lyme disease has been used to describe the persistence of symptoms after treatment; however, large clinical trials have not detected a difference in symptom frequency between patients with a history of Lyme disease and matched controls.25,26 Many patients with chronic Lyme disease may instead have posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome, described as nonspecific symptoms including fatigue, arthralgia, and decreased mental acuity following treatment of confirmed Lyme disease. Symptoms generally improve within 1 year.27
Laboratory Testing
The gold standard for laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease is 2-tiered serologic testing. First, an enzyme immunoassay or immunofluorescence assay is used to screen for antibodies. A Western blot follows if the result of the screen is positive or equivocal. Western blot testing for IgM and IgG is used when illness duration is less than 4 weeks; after 4 weeks, a Western blot for IgG alone is sufficient.27,28 The 2-tiered test has 99% specificity. Sensitivity increases with duration of disease (29%–40% with erythema migrans; 42%–87% in early disseminated disease; 97%–100% in late disease).29,30 A false-positive result can occur in the presence of infectious mononucleosis, an autoimmune disorder, and syphilis. If serologic testing is negative and suspicion remains high, testing should be repeated in 2 to 4 weeks.31 When a patient in a Lyme-endemic area presents with typical erythema migrans, serologic testing is unnecessary prior to treatment.32
Management
Treatment of Lyme disease centers on antibiotic therapy (Table). First-line treatment of early disseminated disease is doxycycline for 14 days (range, 10–21 days).27 In pregnant women, children younger than 8 years, and tetracycline-allergic patients, amoxicillin or cefuroxime axetil for 14 days (range, 14–21 days) may be used.33 For erythema migrans without complications, doxycycline for 10 days is effective. Complications that require hospitalization are treated with intravenous ceftriaxone.27 Re-treatment in patients with posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome is not recommended.34 Prophylaxis with a single dose of doxycycline 200 mg may be indicated when all of the following conditions are met: (1) the patient is in an area where more than 20% of Ixodes ticks are infected with B burgdorferi, (2) the attached tick is I scapularis, (3) the tick has been attached for more than 36 hours, and (4) treatment is begun within 72 hours of tick removal.27
- Anderson JF, Magnarelli LA. Biology of ticks. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2008;22:195-215.
- Jongejan F, Uilenberg G. The global importance of ticks. Parasitology. 2004;129(suppl):S3-S14.
- Xu G, Fang QQ, Keirans JE, et al. Molecular phylogenetic analyses indicate that the Ixodes ricinus complex is a paraphyletic group. J Parasitol. 2003;89:452-457.
- Swanson SJ, Neitzel D, Reed DK, et al. Coinfections acquired from Ixodes ticks. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:708-727.
- Mathison BA, Pritt BS. Laboratory identification of arthropod ectoparasites. Clin Microbol Rev. 2014;27:48-67.
- Falco RC, Fish D, Piesman J. Duration of tick bites in a Lyme disease-endemic area. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143:187-192.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lyme disease graphs. http://www.cdc.gov/lyme/stats/graphs.html. Updated November 21, 2016. Accessed November 21, 2017.
- Randolph SE. The impact of tick ecology on pathogen transmission dynamics. In: Bowman AS, Nuttall PA, eds. Ticks: Biology, Disease and Control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2008:40-72.
- Ostfeld RS, Brunner JL. Climate change and Ixodes tick-borne diseases of humans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370. pii:20140051. doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0051.
- Medlock JM, Hansford KM, Bormane A, et al. Driving forces for changes in geographical distribution of Ixodes ricinus ticks in Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:1.
- McGinley-Smith DE, Tsao SS. Dermatoses from ticks. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:393-396.
- Middleton DB. Tick-borne infections. What starts as a tiny bite may have a serious outcome. Postgrad Med. 1994;95:131-139.
- Melski JW. Wells’ syndrome, insect bites, and eosinophils. Dermatol Clin. 2015;8:287-293.
- Castelli E, Caputo V, Morello V, et al. Local reactions to tick bites. Am J Dermatopathol. 2008;30:241-248.
- Pritt BS, Mead PS, Johnson DK, et al. Identification of a novel pathogenic Borrelia species causing Lyme borreliosis with unusually high spirochaetaemia: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:556-564.
- Orloski KA, Hayes EB, Campbell GL, et al. Surveillance for Lyme disease—United States, 1992-1998. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000;49:1-11.
- Gray JS. The ecology of ticks transmitting Lyme borreliosis. Exp Appl Acarol. 1998;22:249-258.
- Piesman J, Mather TN, Sinsky RJ, et al. Duration of tick attachment and Borrelia burgdorferi transmission. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:557-558.
- Richardson M, Elliman D, Maguire H, et al. Evidence base of incubation periods, periods of infectiousness and exclusion policies for the control of communicable diseases in schools and preschools. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001;20:380-391.
- Myers SA, Sexton DJ. Dermatologic manifestations of arthropod-borne diseases. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1994;8:689-712.
- Ducroux E, Debarbieux S, Boibieux A, et al. Follicular borreliosis: an atypical presentation of erythema chronicum migrans. Dermatology. 2009;219:84-85.
- Miraflor AP, Seidel GD, Perry AE, et al. The many masks of cutaneous Lyme disease. J Cutan Pathol. 2016:43:32-40.
- Lenormand C, Jaulhac B, Debarbieux S, et al. Expanding the clinicopathological spectrum of late cutaneous Lyme borreliosis (acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans): a prospective study of 20 culture and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) documented cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:685-692.
- Zajkowska J, Czupryna P, Pancewicz SA, et al. Acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11:800.
- Seltzer EG, Gerber MA, Cartter ML, et al. Long-term outcomes of persons with Lyme disease. JAMA. 2000;283:609-616.
- Shadick NA, Phillips CB, Sangha O, et al. Musculoskeletal and neurologic outcomes in patients with previously treated Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:919-926.
- Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED, et al. The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:1089-1134.
- Schriefer ME. Lyme disease diagnosis: serology. Clin Lab Med. 2015;35:797-814.
- Wormser GP, Nowakowski J, Nadelman RB, et al. Impact of clinical variables on Borrelia burgdorferi-specific antibody seropositivity in acute-phase sera from patients in North America with culture-confirmed early Lyme disease. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008;15:1519-1522.
- Leeflang MM, Ang CW, Berkhout J, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for Lyme borreliosis in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:140.
- Sanchez E, Vannier E, Wormser GP, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: a review. JAMA. 2016;315:1767-1777.
- Lantos PM, Brinkerhoff RJ, Wormser GP, et al. Empiric antibiotic treatment of erythema migrans-like skin lesions as a function of geography: a clinical and cost effectiveness modeling study. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013;13:877-883.
- Smith GN, Gemmill I, Moore KM. Management of tick bites and Lyme disease during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34:1087-1091.
- Berende A, ter Hofstede HJ, Vos FJ, et al. Randomized trial of longer-term therapy for symptoms attributed to Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1209-1220.
- Anderson JF, Magnarelli LA. Biology of ticks. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2008;22:195-215.
- Jongejan F, Uilenberg G. The global importance of ticks. Parasitology. 2004;129(suppl):S3-S14.
- Xu G, Fang QQ, Keirans JE, et al. Molecular phylogenetic analyses indicate that the Ixodes ricinus complex is a paraphyletic group. J Parasitol. 2003;89:452-457.
- Swanson SJ, Neitzel D, Reed DK, et al. Coinfections acquired from Ixodes ticks. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:708-727.
- Mathison BA, Pritt BS. Laboratory identification of arthropod ectoparasites. Clin Microbol Rev. 2014;27:48-67.
- Falco RC, Fish D, Piesman J. Duration of tick bites in a Lyme disease-endemic area. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143:187-192.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lyme disease graphs. http://www.cdc.gov/lyme/stats/graphs.html. Updated November 21, 2016. Accessed November 21, 2017.
- Randolph SE. The impact of tick ecology on pathogen transmission dynamics. In: Bowman AS, Nuttall PA, eds. Ticks: Biology, Disease and Control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2008:40-72.
- Ostfeld RS, Brunner JL. Climate change and Ixodes tick-borne diseases of humans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370. pii:20140051. doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0051.
- Medlock JM, Hansford KM, Bormane A, et al. Driving forces for changes in geographical distribution of Ixodes ricinus ticks in Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:1.
- McGinley-Smith DE, Tsao SS. Dermatoses from ticks. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:393-396.
- Middleton DB. Tick-borne infections. What starts as a tiny bite may have a serious outcome. Postgrad Med. 1994;95:131-139.
- Melski JW. Wells’ syndrome, insect bites, and eosinophils. Dermatol Clin. 2015;8:287-293.
- Castelli E, Caputo V, Morello V, et al. Local reactions to tick bites. Am J Dermatopathol. 2008;30:241-248.
- Pritt BS, Mead PS, Johnson DK, et al. Identification of a novel pathogenic Borrelia species causing Lyme borreliosis with unusually high spirochaetaemia: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:556-564.
- Orloski KA, Hayes EB, Campbell GL, et al. Surveillance for Lyme disease—United States, 1992-1998. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000;49:1-11.
- Gray JS. The ecology of ticks transmitting Lyme borreliosis. Exp Appl Acarol. 1998;22:249-258.
- Piesman J, Mather TN, Sinsky RJ, et al. Duration of tick attachment and Borrelia burgdorferi transmission. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:557-558.
- Richardson M, Elliman D, Maguire H, et al. Evidence base of incubation periods, periods of infectiousness and exclusion policies for the control of communicable diseases in schools and preschools. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001;20:380-391.
- Myers SA, Sexton DJ. Dermatologic manifestations of arthropod-borne diseases. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1994;8:689-712.
- Ducroux E, Debarbieux S, Boibieux A, et al. Follicular borreliosis: an atypical presentation of erythema chronicum migrans. Dermatology. 2009;219:84-85.
- Miraflor AP, Seidel GD, Perry AE, et al. The many masks of cutaneous Lyme disease. J Cutan Pathol. 2016:43:32-40.
- Lenormand C, Jaulhac B, Debarbieux S, et al. Expanding the clinicopathological spectrum of late cutaneous Lyme borreliosis (acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans): a prospective study of 20 culture and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) documented cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:685-692.
- Zajkowska J, Czupryna P, Pancewicz SA, et al. Acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11:800.
- Seltzer EG, Gerber MA, Cartter ML, et al. Long-term outcomes of persons with Lyme disease. JAMA. 2000;283:609-616.
- Shadick NA, Phillips CB, Sangha O, et al. Musculoskeletal and neurologic outcomes in patients with previously treated Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:919-926.
- Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED, et al. The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:1089-1134.
- Schriefer ME. Lyme disease diagnosis: serology. Clin Lab Med. 2015;35:797-814.
- Wormser GP, Nowakowski J, Nadelman RB, et al. Impact of clinical variables on Borrelia burgdorferi-specific antibody seropositivity in acute-phase sera from patients in North America with culture-confirmed early Lyme disease. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008;15:1519-1522.
- Leeflang MM, Ang CW, Berkhout J, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for Lyme borreliosis in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:140.
- Sanchez E, Vannier E, Wormser GP, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: a review. JAMA. 2016;315:1767-1777.
- Lantos PM, Brinkerhoff RJ, Wormser GP, et al. Empiric antibiotic treatment of erythema migrans-like skin lesions as a function of geography: a clinical and cost effectiveness modeling study. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013;13:877-883.
- Smith GN, Gemmill I, Moore KM. Management of tick bites and Lyme disease during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34:1087-1091.
- Berende A, ter Hofstede HJ, Vos FJ, et al. Randomized trial of longer-term therapy for symptoms attributed to Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1209-1220.
Practice Points
- Lyme disease is transmitted by Ixodes ticks in the northeastern, midwestern, and far western United States.
- Most tick-borne illnesses, including Lyme disease, respond to treatment with doxycycline.
- Babesiosis, a malarialike illness, can be transmitted concurrently with Lyme disease.