Environmental Dermatology

Identification

Phlebotomine sand flies are the only member of the Psychodidae family that are capable of taking blood.¹ The mouthparts of the sand fly are toothed distally, and the maxilla and mandible are utilized in a sawtooth fashion to take a bloodmeal.² The flies are very small (ie, only 1.5–3.5 mm in length), which makes their identification difficult.¹ Sand flies can be distinguished by the appearance of their wings, which often are covered in hair and extend across the back in a V shape.³ The adult sand fly is hairy with a 6- to 8-segmented abdomen, and the color can range from gray to yellow to brown.² Phlebotomine sand flies can be further identified by their long antennae, dark eyes, and small heads (Figure).²

As is the case with all Diptera, the sand fly goes through 4 complete life stages from egg to larva to pupa to adult.³ Female sand flies will lay their eggs following a blood meal and have been found to take multiple blood meals in a single cycle.² On average, the eggs will hatch in 6 to 17 days but are temperature dependent.³ The subsequent larvae and pupa stages last 20 to 30 days and 6 to 13 days, respectively.¹ The larvae are white in color with short antennae and dark heads.⁴ Sand flies prefer to lay their eggs in areas where adequate resting places are available and where their larvae will thrive.^4,5 The larvae require warm moist environments to succeed and thus are commonly found in animal burrows.³ Once fully developed, the adult sand fly can live up to 6 weeks.²

Sand Fly Vector

Although it is more common in rural forested areas, the sand fly also can be found in urban areas, including heavily populated cities in Brazil.⁶ Sand flies are most active during hot humid seasons but depending on the local climate may remain active year-round.^1,7 For example, in tropical regions of Asia, the number of sand flies increases substantially during the monsoon season compared to the dry season.² Phlebotomine sand flies are most active at dusk and during the night⁵ but may become agitated during the daytime if their environment is disturbed.¹

Host selection usually is broad and includes a wide variety of vertebrates.² In the United States, host species are thought to include small rodents, foxes, armadillos, and opossums.⁸ One study found that visceral leishmaniasis in foxhounds is able to develop fully in sand flies, thus posing an emerging risk to the American population.⁹

Distribution

The Phlebotominae family contains approximately 700 different species of sand flies but only 21 are known vectors of disease.¹⁰ The great majority belong to 1 of 3 genuses: Phlebotomus, Sergentomyia, and Lutzomyia.¹¹ The vectors are commonly divided into Old World species, dominated by the Phlebotomus genus, and New World species, which exclusively refers to the Lutzomyia genus.³ The Old World and New World distinction helps to classify the various vectors and subsequently the diseases they transmit. Old World refers to those vectors found in Southwest and Central Asia, the Indian subcontinent, the Middle East, and East Africa, as well as Southern Europe.⁶ New World refers to vectors found predominantly in Brazil and other parts of Latin America but also Mexico and the United States.⁶ Sand flies are found to be endemic in 90 countries and on each continent, except Australia.⁵ Although the vector can be found in a variety of environments, sand flies prefer moist environments that typify tropical and subtropical climates, thus it is not surprising that the highest diversity of Phlebotominae in the world can be found in the Amazon basin.¹²

Disease Transmission

Leishmania refers to a genus of intracellular protozoa found in both the Old World and the New World that causes a variety of clinical syndromes.⁵ Approximately 20 Leishmania species are known to cause human disease that includes localized cutaneous, diffuse cutaneous, mucosal cutaneous, and visceral infections.¹³ Cases of all forms of leishmaniasis worldwide have increased rapidly over the last few decades from multiple factors including war in endemic regions, increased numbers of immunodeficient individuals, and increased travel to endemic areas.¹⁴ In the United States, leishmaniasis is caused by both imported and autochthonous forms of transmission and often mirrors recent travel and immigration patterns.^14,15

Sand flies also serve as vectors for sandfly fever, also known as Pappataci fever. Although sandfly fever commonly causes a mild febrile illness, it has been shown to be a considerable cause of aseptic meningitis.¹⁶ A number of novel Phleboviruses have been isolated as causes of sandfly fever, including Massilia virus, Granada virus, and Punique virus.^16-18 A form of sandfly fever caused by the Toscana virus has a predilection for the nervous system and can cause encephalitis.¹⁹ Sandfly fever can be found in both the Old World and New World and thus poses a global risk.² Additionally, Phlebotominae also have been found to transmit the Changuinola virus, a type of bunyavirus that is known to cause febrile illness in Panama.²⁰ Vesicular stomatitis, also carried by sand flies, is a known cause of febrile disease in North and South America, including the United States.² In 2013, the Niakha virus, a novel type of Rhabdoviridae, was isolated from Phlebotominae in Senegal.²¹ The sand fly is noted to transmit another type of Rhabdoviridae in India and Africa, known as the Chandipura virus.²² Although originally thought to cause mild febrile disease, it was the primary cause of multiple outbreaks of fatal encephalitis in India in 2003^23,24 and again in 2012.²²

Sand flies also are known to serve as vectors for the bacterium Bartonella bacilliformis, which is responsible for bartonellosis.²⁵ The disease is divided into 2 forms, which can occur separately or in succession, and is endemic to the Andes region of Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia. The first form is Oroya fever, an acute febrile hemolytic anemia that is fatal in 40% to 88% of cases without intervention.²⁵ This bacterium also causes verruga peruana, an endemic form of bacillary angiomatosis that can persist for years.² Two reports suggested that bartonellosis also can be caused by Bartonella rochalimae and Candidatus Bartonella ancashi.^26,27

Vector Control

Prevention is key to reducing the risk of the various diseases caused by the Phlebotominae vector. Vector control often falls into a few categories, including residual sprays, barriers, and topical repellants.³ It appears that residual sprays applied to houses and animal shelters are the most utilized and effective form of control, with the pyrethroid insecticides having the highest sand fly–specific toxicity.^3,28 Insecticides also have been applied to animal burrows where sand flies are known to reproduce; one study in Kenya showed a 90% reduction in the sand fly population following treatment of termite and animal burrows with a pyrethroid spray.²⁹ Studies by Perich et al^30,31 in 1995 and 2003 showed that using barrier sprays can be an effective protective measure. The investigators applied a 100-m barrier using a pyrethroid spray on vegetation and reported a notable decrease in sand flies for over an 80-day period.^30,31

For personal protection, barrier methods are important adjunct methods of preventing individual exposures. Due to the small size of sand flies, ordinary bed nets are not effective and those treated with insecticides should be used,¹⁵ which may ultimately prove to be the most sustainable way to prevent sand fly–borne disease.³² Protective attire also should be worn, as sand flies are not able to penetrate clothing.² N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET)–based repellants should be applied to exposed skin.¹⁵ Finally, it is important to avoid exposure from dusk to dawn when sand flies are most active.¹⁵

Rise in Autochthonous Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in the United States

With the increased amount of worldwide tourism, especially to endemic areas, providers will continue to see rising numbers of leishmaniasis in the United States. It is difficult to determine the incidence of the disease in the United States, but one study has shown that leishmaniasis accounts for 143 of every 1000 dermatologic diseases acquired by South American tourists.^33,34 In addition, the number of autochthonous cases reported in the United States continues to grow. Although only 29 cases were reported between 1903 and 1996, 13 cases were reported between 2000 and 2008.³⁵ Another report in 2013 described an additional 3 cases in the states of Texas and Oklahoma.³⁵ The cases have continued to move in a northeasterly pattern, suggesting a possible shift in the location of sand fly populations. Each of these cases in which a specific species of Leishmania was identified showed transmission of Leishmania mexicana.³⁵ Most cases of cutaneous disease have occurred in Texas and Oklahoma. The first known case outside of this region was reported in 2014 in North Dakota.⁸ Leishmania donovani, brought into the United States with European foxhounds, also is spreading.⁸ One species of sand fly, Leishmania shannoni, has now been discovered in 16 states,^36-42 where it serves as a potential vector for L mexicana.^43,44

Identification

Phlebotomine sand flies are the only member of the Psychodidae family that are capable of taking blood.¹ The mouthparts of the sand fly are toothed distally, and the maxilla and mandible are utilized in a sawtooth fashion to take a bloodmeal.² The flies are very small (ie, only 1.5–3.5 mm in length), which makes their identification difficult.¹ Sand flies can be distinguished by the appearance of their wings, which often are covered in hair and extend across the back in a V shape.³ The adult sand fly is hairy with a 6- to 8-segmented abdomen, and the color can range from gray to yellow to brown.² Phlebotomine sand flies can be further identified by their long antennae, dark eyes, and small heads (Figure).²

As is the case with all Diptera, the sand fly goes through 4 complete life stages from egg to larva to pupa to adult.³ Female sand flies will lay their eggs following a blood meal and have been found to take multiple blood meals in a single cycle.² On average, the eggs will hatch in 6 to 17 days but are temperature dependent.³ The subsequent larvae and pupa stages last 20 to 30 days and 6 to 13 days, respectively.¹ The larvae are white in color with short antennae and dark heads.⁴ Sand flies prefer to lay their eggs in areas where adequate resting places are available and where their larvae will thrive.^4,5 The larvae require warm moist environments to succeed and thus are commonly found in animal burrows.³ Once fully developed, the adult sand fly can live up to 6 weeks.²

Sand Fly Vector

Although it is more common in rural forested areas, the sand fly also can be found in urban areas, including heavily populated cities in Brazil.⁶ Sand flies are most active during hot humid seasons but depending on the local climate may remain active year-round.^1,7 For example, in tropical regions of Asia, the number of sand flies increases substantially during the monsoon season compared to the dry season.² Phlebotomine sand flies are most active at dusk and during the night⁵ but may become agitated during the daytime if their environment is disturbed.¹

Host selection usually is broad and includes a wide variety of vertebrates.² In the United States, host species are thought to include small rodents, foxes, armadillos, and opossums.⁸ One study found that visceral leishmaniasis in foxhounds is able to develop fully in sand flies, thus posing an emerging risk to the American population.⁹

Distribution

The Phlebotominae family contains approximately 700 different species of sand flies but only 21 are known vectors of disease.¹⁰ The great majority belong to 1 of 3 genuses: Phlebotomus, Sergentomyia, and Lutzomyia.¹¹ The vectors are commonly divided into Old World species, dominated by the Phlebotomus genus, and New World species, which exclusively refers to the Lutzomyia genus.³ The Old World and New World distinction helps to classify the various vectors and subsequently the diseases they transmit. Old World refers to those vectors found in Southwest and Central Asia, the Indian subcontinent, the Middle East, and East Africa, as well as Southern Europe.⁶ New World refers to vectors found predominantly in Brazil and other parts of Latin America but also Mexico and the United States.⁶ Sand flies are found to be endemic in 90 countries and on each continent, except Australia.⁵ Although the vector can be found in a variety of environments, sand flies prefer moist environments that typify tropical and subtropical climates, thus it is not surprising that the highest diversity of Phlebotominae in the world can be found in the Amazon basin.¹²

Disease Transmission

Leishmania refers to a genus of intracellular protozoa found in both the Old World and the New World that causes a variety of clinical syndromes.⁵ Approximately 20 Leishmania species are known to cause human disease that includes localized cutaneous, diffuse cutaneous, mucosal cutaneous, and visceral infections.¹³ Cases of all forms of leishmaniasis worldwide have increased rapidly over the last few decades from multiple factors including war in endemic regions, increased numbers of immunodeficient individuals, and increased travel to endemic areas.¹⁴ In the United States, leishmaniasis is caused by both imported and autochthonous forms of transmission and often mirrors recent travel and immigration patterns.^14,15

Sand flies also serve as vectors for sandfly fever, also known as Pappataci fever. Although sandfly fever commonly causes a mild febrile illness, it has been shown to be a considerable cause of aseptic meningitis.¹⁶ A number of novel Phleboviruses have been isolated as causes of sandfly fever, including Massilia virus, Granada virus, and Punique virus.^16-18 A form of sandfly fever caused by the Toscana virus has a predilection for the nervous system and can cause encephalitis.¹⁹ Sandfly fever can be found in both the Old World and New World and thus poses a global risk.² Additionally, Phlebotominae also have been found to transmit the Changuinola virus, a type of bunyavirus that is known to cause febrile illness in Panama.²⁰ Vesicular stomatitis, also carried by sand flies, is a known cause of febrile disease in North and South America, including the United States.² In 2013, the Niakha virus, a novel type of Rhabdoviridae, was isolated from Phlebotominae in Senegal.²¹ The sand fly is noted to transmit another type of Rhabdoviridae in India and Africa, known as the Chandipura virus.²² Although originally thought to cause mild febrile disease, it was the primary cause of multiple outbreaks of fatal encephalitis in India in 2003^23,24 and again in 2012.²²

Sand flies also are known to serve as vectors for the bacterium Bartonella bacilliformis, which is responsible for bartonellosis.²⁵ The disease is divided into 2 forms, which can occur separately or in succession, and is endemic to the Andes region of Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia. The first form is Oroya fever, an acute febrile hemolytic anemia that is fatal in 40% to 88% of cases without intervention.²⁵ This bacterium also causes verruga peruana, an endemic form of bacillary angiomatosis that can persist for years.² Two reports suggested that bartonellosis also can be caused by Bartonella rochalimae and Candidatus Bartonella ancashi.^26,27

Vector Control

Prevention is key to reducing the risk of the various diseases caused by the Phlebotominae vector. Vector control often falls into a few categories, including residual sprays, barriers, and topical repellants.³ It appears that residual sprays applied to houses and animal shelters are the most utilized and effective form of control, with the pyrethroid insecticides having the highest sand fly–specific toxicity.^3,28 Insecticides also have been applied to animal burrows where sand flies are known to reproduce; one study in Kenya showed a 90% reduction in the sand fly population following treatment of termite and animal burrows with a pyrethroid spray.²⁹ Studies by Perich et al^30,31 in 1995 and 2003 showed that using barrier sprays can be an effective protective measure. The investigators applied a 100-m barrier using a pyrethroid spray on vegetation and reported a notable decrease in sand flies for over an 80-day period.^30,31

For personal protection, barrier methods are important adjunct methods of preventing individual exposures. Due to the small size of sand flies, ordinary bed nets are not effective and those treated with insecticides should be used,¹⁵ which may ultimately prove to be the most sustainable way to prevent sand fly–borne disease.³² Protective attire also should be worn, as sand flies are not able to penetrate clothing.² N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET)–based repellants should be applied to exposed skin.¹⁵ Finally, it is important to avoid exposure from dusk to dawn when sand flies are most active.¹⁵

Rise in Autochthonous Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in the United States

With the increased amount of worldwide tourism, especially to endemic areas, providers will continue to see rising numbers of leishmaniasis in the United States. It is difficult to determine the incidence of the disease in the United States, but one study has shown that leishmaniasis accounts for 143 of every 1000 dermatologic diseases acquired by South American tourists.^33,34 In addition, the number of autochthonous cases reported in the United States continues to grow. Although only 29 cases were reported between 1903 and 1996, 13 cases were reported between 2000 and 2008.³⁵ Another report in 2013 described an additional 3 cases in the states of Texas and Oklahoma.³⁵ The cases have continued to move in a northeasterly pattern, suggesting a possible shift in the location of sand fly populations. Each of these cases in which a specific species of Leishmania was identified showed transmission of Leishmania mexicana.³⁵ Most cases of cutaneous disease have occurred in Texas and Oklahoma. The first known case outside of this region was reported in 2014 in North Dakota.⁸ Leishmania donovani, brought into the United States with European foxhounds, also is spreading.⁸ One species of sand fly, Leishmania shannoni, has now been discovered in 16 states,^36-42 where it serves as a potential vector for L mexicana.^43,44

Identification

Phlebotomine sand flies are the only member of the Psychodidae family that are capable of taking blood.¹ The mouthparts of the sand fly are toothed distally, and the maxilla and mandible are utilized in a sawtooth fashion to take a bloodmeal.² The flies are very small (ie, only 1.5–3.5 mm in length), which makes their identification difficult.¹ Sand flies can be distinguished by the appearance of their wings, which often are covered in hair and extend across the back in a V shape.³ The adult sand fly is hairy with a 6- to 8-segmented abdomen, and the color can range from gray to yellow to brown.² Phlebotomine sand flies can be further identified by their long antennae, dark eyes, and small heads (Figure).²

As is the case with all Diptera, the sand fly goes through 4 complete life stages from egg to larva to pupa to adult.³ Female sand flies will lay their eggs following a blood meal and have been found to take multiple blood meals in a single cycle.² On average, the eggs will hatch in 6 to 17 days but are temperature dependent.³ The subsequent larvae and pupa stages last 20 to 30 days and 6 to 13 days, respectively.¹ The larvae are white in color with short antennae and dark heads.⁴ Sand flies prefer to lay their eggs in areas where adequate resting places are available and where their larvae will thrive.^4,5 The larvae require warm moist environments to succeed and thus are commonly found in animal burrows.³ Once fully developed, the adult sand fly can live up to 6 weeks.²

Sand Fly Vector

Although it is more common in rural forested areas, the sand fly also can be found in urban areas, including heavily populated cities in Brazil.⁶ Sand flies are most active during hot humid seasons but depending on the local climate may remain active year-round.^1,7 For example, in tropical regions of Asia, the number of sand flies increases substantially during the monsoon season compared to the dry season.² Phlebotomine sand flies are most active at dusk and during the night⁵ but may become agitated during the daytime if their environment is disturbed.¹

Host selection usually is broad and includes a wide variety of vertebrates.² In the United States, host species are thought to include small rodents, foxes, armadillos, and opossums.⁸ One study found that visceral leishmaniasis in foxhounds is able to develop fully in sand flies, thus posing an emerging risk to the American population.⁹

Distribution

The Phlebotominae family contains approximately 700 different species of sand flies but only 21 are known vectors of disease.¹⁰ The great majority belong to 1 of 3 genuses: Phlebotomus, Sergentomyia, and Lutzomyia.¹¹ The vectors are commonly divided into Old World species, dominated by the Phlebotomus genus, and New World species, which exclusively refers to the Lutzomyia genus.³ The Old World and New World distinction helps to classify the various vectors and subsequently the diseases they transmit. Old World refers to those vectors found in Southwest and Central Asia, the Indian subcontinent, the Middle East, and East Africa, as well as Southern Europe.⁶ New World refers to vectors found predominantly in Brazil and other parts of Latin America but also Mexico and the United States.⁶ Sand flies are found to be endemic in 90 countries and on each continent, except Australia.⁵ Although the vector can be found in a variety of environments, sand flies prefer moist environments that typify tropical and subtropical climates, thus it is not surprising that the highest diversity of Phlebotominae in the world can be found in the Amazon basin.¹²

Disease Transmission

Leishmania refers to a genus of intracellular protozoa found in both the Old World and the New World that causes a variety of clinical syndromes.⁵ Approximately 20 Leishmania species are known to cause human disease that includes localized cutaneous, diffuse cutaneous, mucosal cutaneous, and visceral infections.¹³ Cases of all forms of leishmaniasis worldwide have increased rapidly over the last few decades from multiple factors including war in endemic regions, increased numbers of immunodeficient individuals, and increased travel to endemic areas.¹⁴ In the United States, leishmaniasis is caused by both imported and autochthonous forms of transmission and often mirrors recent travel and immigration patterns.^14,15

Sand flies also serve as vectors for sandfly fever, also known as Pappataci fever. Although sandfly fever commonly causes a mild febrile illness, it has been shown to be a considerable cause of aseptic meningitis.¹⁶ A number of novel Phleboviruses have been isolated as causes of sandfly fever, including Massilia virus, Granada virus, and Punique virus.^16-18 A form of sandfly fever caused by the Toscana virus has a predilection for the nervous system and can cause encephalitis.¹⁹ Sandfly fever can be found in both the Old World and New World and thus poses a global risk.² Additionally, Phlebotominae also have been found to transmit the Changuinola virus, a type of bunyavirus that is known to cause febrile illness in Panama.²⁰ Vesicular stomatitis, also carried by sand flies, is a known cause of febrile disease in North and South America, including the United States.² In 2013, the Niakha virus, a novel type of Rhabdoviridae, was isolated from Phlebotominae in Senegal.²¹ The sand fly is noted to transmit another type of Rhabdoviridae in India and Africa, known as the Chandipura virus.²² Although originally thought to cause mild febrile disease, it was the primary cause of multiple outbreaks of fatal encephalitis in India in 2003^23,24 and again in 2012.²²

Sand flies also are known to serve as vectors for the bacterium Bartonella bacilliformis, which is responsible for bartonellosis.²⁵ The disease is divided into 2 forms, which can occur separately or in succession, and is endemic to the Andes region of Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia. The first form is Oroya fever, an acute febrile hemolytic anemia that is fatal in 40% to 88% of cases without intervention.²⁵ This bacterium also causes verruga peruana, an endemic form of bacillary angiomatosis that can persist for years.² Two reports suggested that bartonellosis also can be caused by Bartonella rochalimae and Candidatus Bartonella ancashi.^26,27

Vector Control

Prevention is key to reducing the risk of the various diseases caused by the Phlebotominae vector. Vector control often falls into a few categories, including residual sprays, barriers, and topical repellants.³ It appears that residual sprays applied to houses and animal shelters are the most utilized and effective form of control, with the pyrethroid insecticides having the highest sand fly–specific toxicity.^3,28 Insecticides also have been applied to animal burrows where sand flies are known to reproduce; one study in Kenya showed a 90% reduction in the sand fly population following treatment of termite and animal burrows with a pyrethroid spray.²⁹ Studies by Perich et al^30,31 in 1995 and 2003 showed that using barrier sprays can be an effective protective measure. The investigators applied a 100-m barrier using a pyrethroid spray on vegetation and reported a notable decrease in sand flies for over an 80-day period.^30,31

For personal protection, barrier methods are important adjunct methods of preventing individual exposures. Due to the small size of sand flies, ordinary bed nets are not effective and those treated with insecticides should be used,¹⁵ which may ultimately prove to be the most sustainable way to prevent sand fly–borne disease.³² Protective attire also should be worn, as sand flies are not able to penetrate clothing.² N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET)–based repellants should be applied to exposed skin.¹⁵ Finally, it is important to avoid exposure from dusk to dawn when sand flies are most active.¹⁵

Rise in Autochthonous Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in the United States

With the increased amount of worldwide tourism, especially to endemic areas, providers will continue to see rising numbers of leishmaniasis in the United States. It is difficult to determine the incidence of the disease in the United States, but one study has shown that leishmaniasis accounts for 143 of every 1000 dermatologic diseases acquired by South American tourists.^33,34 In addition, the number of autochthonous cases reported in the United States continues to grow. Although only 29 cases were reported between 1903 and 1996, 13 cases were reported between 2000 and 2008.³⁵ Another report in 2013 described an additional 3 cases in the states of Texas and Oklahoma.³⁵ The cases have continued to move in a northeasterly pattern, suggesting a possible shift in the location of sand fly populations. Each of these cases in which a specific species of Leishmania was identified showed transmission of Leishmania mexicana.³⁵ Most cases of cutaneous disease have occurred in Texas and Oklahoma. The first known case outside of this region was reported in 2014 in North Dakota.⁸ Leishmania donovani, brought into the United States with European foxhounds, also is spreading.⁸ One species of sand fly, Leishmania shannoni, has now been discovered in 16 states,^36-42 where it serves as a potential vector for L mexicana.^43,44

Background and Distribution

The Dermacentor ticks belong to the family Ixodidae (hard ticks). The 2 best-known ticks of the genus are Dermacentor andersoni (Rocky Mountain wood tick)(Figure, A) and Dermacentor variabilis (American dog tick)(Figure, B). The Dermacentor ticks are large ticks with small anterior mouthparts that attach to a rectangular basis capituli (Figure, A). Both ticks exhibit widely spaced eyes and posterior festoons as well as bifid coxa 1 (the attachment site for the first pair of legs) and enlarged coxa 4. As adults, these ticks display an ornate hard dorsal plate, or scutum, with numerous pits. Female ticks have a much smaller scutum, allowing for abdominal engorgement during feeding.¹ Although D andersoni tends to have a brown to yellow hue, the specimens of D variabilis display a somewhat silver color pattern.

Dermacentor ticks can be found throughout most of North America, with the northern distribution limits of both species previously occurring in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada. Although the range of D andersoni has remained relatively stable within this distribution, the distribution of D variabilis recently has expanded westward and northward of these limits.² The ranges of the 2 species overlap in certain areas, though D andersoni primarily is found in the Rocky Mountain and northwestern states as well as southwestern Canada, whereas D variabilis can be found throughout most parts of the United States, except in the Rocky Mountain states.³ Within these regions the ticks can be found in heavily wooded areas, but they most commonly inhabit fields with tall grass, crops, bushes, and shrubbery, often clustering where these types of vegetation form clearly defined edges.⁴ The diseases transmitted by the Dermacentor ticks include Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF), Colorado tick fever, tularemia, tick paralysis, and even human monocytic erlichiosis, though Amblyomma americanum is the major vector for human monocytic erlichiosis.

Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever

Both species of ticks are known to serve as vectors for RMSF, but D variabilis is the major vector in the United States, especially in the eastern and southeastern parts of the United States. Overall, the majority of cases occur in North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Oklahoma,⁵ with North Carolina having the highest incidence. In endemic areas, RMSF should be suspected in any patient with fever and headache, and empiric treatment with antibiotics should be started while awaiting the results of diagnostic tests. Serologic testing with indirect fluorescent antibodies is widely available and is considered the best method for detection; although the sensitivity is poor during the first 10 to 12 days of infection, it increases to 94% during days 14 to 21.⁶ Therapeutic decisions should be influenced by clinical suspicion and epidemiologic data. Treatment should be started promptly and should never be delayed until confirmatory tests are available. Doxycycline is considered the gold standard therapy in both adults and children, with a typical treatment duration of 10 days. The only other recommended agent for pregnant women in the first or second trimesters or patients with severe hypersensitivity reactions to tetracyclines is chloramphenicol.⁷

Colorado Tick Fever

Colorado tick fever, also known as mountain fever, is an arboviral infection transmitted by D andersoni. Its distribution coincides with the tick’s natural geographic range in the western United States and Rocky Mountains. Colorado tick fever causes an acute febrile illness consisting of chills, headaches, myalgia, retro-orbital pain, and malaise, which tend to occur within 3 to 5 days of the tick bite. Some cases may be accompanied by a nonspecific rash that may be morbilliform or petechial in appearance. Notably, approximately half of all patients will experience transient resolution of symptoms for 24 to 48 hours followed by a recurrence of fever, a phenomenon that has been referred to as saddleback fever. Routine laboratory findings may include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and a peripheral smear with atypical lymphocytes. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction is both sensitive and specific for detecting viral loads in the blood during the first week of infection, though testing does not alter management, which is largely supportive.⁸

Tularemia

Tularemia is a relatively rare disease but has been documented in every US state except Hawaii.⁹ The disease is caused by Francisella tularensis, a small, aerobic, gram-negative coccobacillus transmitted via inhalation, bitingflies, or tick bites; the most common ticks to transmit the disease include D andersoni, D variabilis, and A americanum.¹⁰ Clinical manifestations depend on the form of exposure, with tick bites most often resulting in an ulcerated skin lesion at the site of the vector bite accompanied by regional lymphadenopathy and systemic symptoms such as fever, chills, myalgia, and headache.¹¹ Mucosal manifestations such as pharyngitis, conjunctivitis, and other ocular lesions also are commonly seen. Diagnosis most frequently is made using serology because F tularensis is both challenging and dangerous to culture; in fact, because of the high risk of contagion, F tularensis should only be cultured in biosafety level 3 laboratories. Polymerase chain reaction assays can be used on tissue samples with decent sensitivity (78%) and specificity (96%); however, these assays cannot distinguish between Francisella subspecies and are not readily available to most clinicians.¹² First-line therapy for the treatment of tularemia is streptomycin given as twice-daily intramuscular injections over the course of 7 to 10 days. Alternative agents include gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, doxycycline, and chloramphenicol.¹⁰ Because tularemia is relatively rare, a high index of suspicion is necessary to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with the disease.

Tick Paralysis

More than 40 different species of ticks have been implicated worldwide as causes of tick paralysis, though D andersoni has been the most common in North America. Female patients account for most cases, possibly because long hair conceals ticks on the scalp or neck, the preferred attachment locations for Dermacentor ticks.¹³ The classic presentation of tick paralysis is an acute, flaccid, ascending paralysis that occurs from a neurotoxin in the tick saliva that impairs afferent nerve signal propagation.^14,15 The paralysis progresses over hours to days and typically occurs 5 to 6 days after attachment of the tick. Notably, there is no associated fever with tick paralysis, and without intervention, patients may die of respiratory failure. Overall, the condition carries a fatality rate of nearly 10%¹⁶ but reverses rapidly if the tick is identified and removed.

Protection against tick bites and tick-borne illnesses includes avoidance of infested areas, treatment of populated habitats with insecticide sprays, use of topical repellants prior to outdoor activities, and diligent full-body tick checks upon return from tick-heavy areas. Permethrin can be used to treat clothing and remains protective through multiple washings. Ticks typically survive washing of untreated clothing but are killed by prolonged drying in a dryer. Pets may be treated with oral, intramuscular, or topical agents prescribed by a veterinarian to prevent tick attachments.

Conclusion

Accurate identification of Dermacentor ticks allows for appropriate surveillance for associated diseases and can improve patient outcomes. Patients who engage in outdoor activities in endemic areas should take steps to avoid exposure, use appropriate acaricides and repellents, and perform tick checks after returning indoors.

Background and Distribution

The Dermacentor ticks belong to the family Ixodidae (hard ticks). The 2 best-known ticks of the genus are Dermacentor andersoni (Rocky Mountain wood tick)(Figure, A) and Dermacentor variabilis (American dog tick)(Figure, B). The Dermacentor ticks are large ticks with small anterior mouthparts that attach to a rectangular basis capituli (Figure, A). Both ticks exhibit widely spaced eyes and posterior festoons as well as bifid coxa 1 (the attachment site for the first pair of legs) and enlarged coxa 4. As adults, these ticks display an ornate hard dorsal plate, or scutum, with numerous pits. Female ticks have a much smaller scutum, allowing for abdominal engorgement during feeding.¹ Although D andersoni tends to have a brown to yellow hue, the specimens of D variabilis display a somewhat silver color pattern.

Dermacentor ticks can be found throughout most of North America, with the northern distribution limits of both species previously occurring in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada. Although the range of D andersoni has remained relatively stable within this distribution, the distribution of D variabilis recently has expanded westward and northward of these limits.² The ranges of the 2 species overlap in certain areas, though D andersoni primarily is found in the Rocky Mountain and northwestern states as well as southwestern Canada, whereas D variabilis can be found throughout most parts of the United States, except in the Rocky Mountain states.³ Within these regions the ticks can be found in heavily wooded areas, but they most commonly inhabit fields with tall grass, crops, bushes, and shrubbery, often clustering where these types of vegetation form clearly defined edges.⁴ The diseases transmitted by the Dermacentor ticks include Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF), Colorado tick fever, tularemia, tick paralysis, and even human monocytic erlichiosis, though Amblyomma americanum is the major vector for human monocytic erlichiosis.

Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever

Both species of ticks are known to serve as vectors for RMSF, but D variabilis is the major vector in the United States, especially in the eastern and southeastern parts of the United States. Overall, the majority of cases occur in North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Oklahoma,⁵ with North Carolina having the highest incidence. In endemic areas, RMSF should be suspected in any patient with fever and headache, and empiric treatment with antibiotics should be started while awaiting the results of diagnostic tests. Serologic testing with indirect fluorescent antibodies is widely available and is considered the best method for detection; although the sensitivity is poor during the first 10 to 12 days of infection, it increases to 94% during days 14 to 21.⁶ Therapeutic decisions should be influenced by clinical suspicion and epidemiologic data. Treatment should be started promptly and should never be delayed until confirmatory tests are available. Doxycycline is considered the gold standard therapy in both adults and children, with a typical treatment duration of 10 days. The only other recommended agent for pregnant women in the first or second trimesters or patients with severe hypersensitivity reactions to tetracyclines is chloramphenicol.⁷

Colorado Tick Fever

Colorado tick fever, also known as mountain fever, is an arboviral infection transmitted by D andersoni. Its distribution coincides with the tick’s natural geographic range in the western United States and Rocky Mountains. Colorado tick fever causes an acute febrile illness consisting of chills, headaches, myalgia, retro-orbital pain, and malaise, which tend to occur within 3 to 5 days of the tick bite. Some cases may be accompanied by a nonspecific rash that may be morbilliform or petechial in appearance. Notably, approximately half of all patients will experience transient resolution of symptoms for 24 to 48 hours followed by a recurrence of fever, a phenomenon that has been referred to as saddleback fever. Routine laboratory findings may include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and a peripheral smear with atypical lymphocytes. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction is both sensitive and specific for detecting viral loads in the blood during the first week of infection, though testing does not alter management, which is largely supportive.⁸

Tularemia

Tularemia is a relatively rare disease but has been documented in every US state except Hawaii.⁹ The disease is caused by Francisella tularensis, a small, aerobic, gram-negative coccobacillus transmitted via inhalation, bitingflies, or tick bites; the most common ticks to transmit the disease include D andersoni, D variabilis, and A americanum.¹⁰ Clinical manifestations depend on the form of exposure, with tick bites most often resulting in an ulcerated skin lesion at the site of the vector bite accompanied by regional lymphadenopathy and systemic symptoms such as fever, chills, myalgia, and headache.¹¹ Mucosal manifestations such as pharyngitis, conjunctivitis, and other ocular lesions also are commonly seen. Diagnosis most frequently is made using serology because F tularensis is both challenging and dangerous to culture; in fact, because of the high risk of contagion, F tularensis should only be cultured in biosafety level 3 laboratories. Polymerase chain reaction assays can be used on tissue samples with decent sensitivity (78%) and specificity (96%); however, these assays cannot distinguish between Francisella subspecies and are not readily available to most clinicians.¹² First-line therapy for the treatment of tularemia is streptomycin given as twice-daily intramuscular injections over the course of 7 to 10 days. Alternative agents include gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, doxycycline, and chloramphenicol.¹⁰ Because tularemia is relatively rare, a high index of suspicion is necessary to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with the disease.

Tick Paralysis

More than 40 different species of ticks have been implicated worldwide as causes of tick paralysis, though D andersoni has been the most common in North America. Female patients account for most cases, possibly because long hair conceals ticks on the scalp or neck, the preferred attachment locations for Dermacentor ticks.¹³ The classic presentation of tick paralysis is an acute, flaccid, ascending paralysis that occurs from a neurotoxin in the tick saliva that impairs afferent nerve signal propagation.^14,15 The paralysis progresses over hours to days and typically occurs 5 to 6 days after attachment of the tick. Notably, there is no associated fever with tick paralysis, and without intervention, patients may die of respiratory failure. Overall, the condition carries a fatality rate of nearly 10%¹⁶ but reverses rapidly if the tick is identified and removed.

Protection against tick bites and tick-borne illnesses includes avoidance of infested areas, treatment of populated habitats with insecticide sprays, use of topical repellants prior to outdoor activities, and diligent full-body tick checks upon return from tick-heavy areas. Permethrin can be used to treat clothing and remains protective through multiple washings. Ticks typically survive washing of untreated clothing but are killed by prolonged drying in a dryer. Pets may be treated with oral, intramuscular, or topical agents prescribed by a veterinarian to prevent tick attachments.

Conclusion

Accurate identification of Dermacentor ticks allows for appropriate surveillance for associated diseases and can improve patient outcomes. Patients who engage in outdoor activities in endemic areas should take steps to avoid exposure, use appropriate acaricides and repellents, and perform tick checks after returning indoors.

Background and Distribution

The Dermacentor ticks belong to the family Ixodidae (hard ticks). The 2 best-known ticks of the genus are Dermacentor andersoni (Rocky Mountain wood tick)(Figure, A) and Dermacentor variabilis (American dog tick)(Figure, B). The Dermacentor ticks are large ticks with small anterior mouthparts that attach to a rectangular basis capituli (Figure, A). Both ticks exhibit widely spaced eyes and posterior festoons as well as bifid coxa 1 (the attachment site for the first pair of legs) and enlarged coxa 4. As adults, these ticks display an ornate hard dorsal plate, or scutum, with numerous pits. Female ticks have a much smaller scutum, allowing for abdominal engorgement during feeding.¹ Although D andersoni tends to have a brown to yellow hue, the specimens of D variabilis display a somewhat silver color pattern.

Dermacentor ticks can be found throughout most of North America, with the northern distribution limits of both species previously occurring in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada. Although the range of D andersoni has remained relatively stable within this distribution, the distribution of D variabilis recently has expanded westward and northward of these limits.² The ranges of the 2 species overlap in certain areas, though D andersoni primarily is found in the Rocky Mountain and northwestern states as well as southwestern Canada, whereas D variabilis can be found throughout most parts of the United States, except in the Rocky Mountain states.³ Within these regions the ticks can be found in heavily wooded areas, but they most commonly inhabit fields with tall grass, crops, bushes, and shrubbery, often clustering where these types of vegetation form clearly defined edges.⁴ The diseases transmitted by the Dermacentor ticks include Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF), Colorado tick fever, tularemia, tick paralysis, and even human monocytic erlichiosis, though Amblyomma americanum is the major vector for human monocytic erlichiosis.

Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever

Both species of ticks are known to serve as vectors for RMSF, but D variabilis is the major vector in the United States, especially in the eastern and southeastern parts of the United States. Overall, the majority of cases occur in North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Oklahoma,⁵ with North Carolina having the highest incidence. In endemic areas, RMSF should be suspected in any patient with fever and headache, and empiric treatment with antibiotics should be started while awaiting the results of diagnostic tests. Serologic testing with indirect fluorescent antibodies is widely available and is considered the best method for detection; although the sensitivity is poor during the first 10 to 12 days of infection, it increases to 94% during days 14 to 21.⁶ Therapeutic decisions should be influenced by clinical suspicion and epidemiologic data. Treatment should be started promptly and should never be delayed until confirmatory tests are available. Doxycycline is considered the gold standard therapy in both adults and children, with a typical treatment duration of 10 days. The only other recommended agent for pregnant women in the first or second trimesters or patients with severe hypersensitivity reactions to tetracyclines is chloramphenicol.⁷

Colorado Tick Fever

Colorado tick fever, also known as mountain fever, is an arboviral infection transmitted by D andersoni. Its distribution coincides with the tick’s natural geographic range in the western United States and Rocky Mountains. Colorado tick fever causes an acute febrile illness consisting of chills, headaches, myalgia, retro-orbital pain, and malaise, which tend to occur within 3 to 5 days of the tick bite. Some cases may be accompanied by a nonspecific rash that may be morbilliform or petechial in appearance. Notably, approximately half of all patients will experience transient resolution of symptoms for 24 to 48 hours followed by a recurrence of fever, a phenomenon that has been referred to as saddleback fever. Routine laboratory findings may include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and a peripheral smear with atypical lymphocytes. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction is both sensitive and specific for detecting viral loads in the blood during the first week of infection, though testing does not alter management, which is largely supportive.⁸

Tularemia

Tularemia is a relatively rare disease but has been documented in every US state except Hawaii.⁹ The disease is caused by Francisella tularensis, a small, aerobic, gram-negative coccobacillus transmitted via inhalation, bitingflies, or tick bites; the most common ticks to transmit the disease include D andersoni, D variabilis, and A americanum.¹⁰ Clinical manifestations depend on the form of exposure, with tick bites most often resulting in an ulcerated skin lesion at the site of the vector bite accompanied by regional lymphadenopathy and systemic symptoms such as fever, chills, myalgia, and headache.¹¹ Mucosal manifestations such as pharyngitis, conjunctivitis, and other ocular lesions also are commonly seen. Diagnosis most frequently is made using serology because F tularensis is both challenging and dangerous to culture; in fact, because of the high risk of contagion, F tularensis should only be cultured in biosafety level 3 laboratories. Polymerase chain reaction assays can be used on tissue samples with decent sensitivity (78%) and specificity (96%); however, these assays cannot distinguish between Francisella subspecies and are not readily available to most clinicians.¹² First-line therapy for the treatment of tularemia is streptomycin given as twice-daily intramuscular injections over the course of 7 to 10 days. Alternative agents include gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, doxycycline, and chloramphenicol.¹⁰ Because tularemia is relatively rare, a high index of suspicion is necessary to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with the disease.

Tick Paralysis

More than 40 different species of ticks have been implicated worldwide as causes of tick paralysis, though D andersoni has been the most common in North America. Female patients account for most cases, possibly because long hair conceals ticks on the scalp or neck, the preferred attachment locations for Dermacentor ticks.¹³ The classic presentation of tick paralysis is an acute, flaccid, ascending paralysis that occurs from a neurotoxin in the tick saliva that impairs afferent nerve signal propagation.^14,15 The paralysis progresses over hours to days and typically occurs 5 to 6 days after attachment of the tick. Notably, there is no associated fever with tick paralysis, and without intervention, patients may die of respiratory failure. Overall, the condition carries a fatality rate of nearly 10%¹⁶ but reverses rapidly if the tick is identified and removed.

Protection against tick bites and tick-borne illnesses includes avoidance of infested areas, treatment of populated habitats with insecticide sprays, use of topical repellants prior to outdoor activities, and diligent full-body tick checks upon return from tick-heavy areas. Permethrin can be used to treat clothing and remains protective through multiple washings. Ticks typically survive washing of untreated clothing but are killed by prolonged drying in a dryer. Pets may be treated with oral, intramuscular, or topical agents prescribed by a veterinarian to prevent tick attachments.

Conclusion

Accurate identification of Dermacentor ticks allows for appropriate surveillance for associated diseases and can improve patient outcomes. Patients who engage in outdoor activities in endemic areas should take steps to avoid exposure, use appropriate acaricides and repellents, and perform tick checks after returning indoors.

The head louse (Pediculus humanus capitis) is a blood-sucking arthropod of the suborder Anoplura. Lice are obligate human parasites that have infested humans since antiquity. Pediculosis capitis is an infestation of the scalp by head lice. It is estimated that 6 to 12 million individuals in the United States are affected with head lice per year.¹ Resistance to topical chemical pediculicides is widespread, and new agents have been developed to address this gap in care.

Characteristics of Head Lice

The head louse is a tan-gray–colored, wingless insect measuring approximately 2- to 3-mm long with 3 body segments. It has 6 legs with claws used to grasp individual hairs, and it moves by crawling; it does not fly or jump.^2,3 The head louse has an elongated abdomen and a small head with short antennae and anterior piercing mouthparts (Figure 1).⁴ Nits are transparent, flask-shaped, 0.5- to 0.8-mm egg cases found firmly cemented to the hair shafts approximately 1 to 4 mm above the level of the scalp (Figure 2).⁵ The head louse resides on scalp hair and feeds off the scalp itself. Both lice and nits can be present throughout the scalp but are most commonly found in the postauricular and occipital scalp.^3,4

Female lice live approximately 30 days and lay 5 to 10 eggs per day. Eggs incubate individually in nits laid close to the scalp for 8 to 10 days before hatching.^1,6 The newly hatched nymphs (also called instars) have multiple exoskeletons that are shed as they grow.⁷ Nymphs mature into adults in approximately 2 weeks, and the life cycle begins again.⁸ Head lice are obligate human parasites, feeding approximately every 4 to 6 hours on the blood of the host; however, they can survive up to 4 days without a blood meal on fomites if the climate and conditions are favorable.^5,9

Epidemiology and Transmission

Head lice infestations commonly occur in children aged 3 to 11 years and are more prevalent in girls and women.^1,10 Infestation rates are not reliably recorded, and few population-based studies have been performed; however, it is estimated that 6 to 12 million individuals are infested annually in the United States.¹ Prevalence in some European populations has been estimated to range from 1% to 20%.¹¹ A 2008 literature review found that worldwide prevalence varied across populations from 0.7% to 59%.¹⁰

Transmission occurs most frequently from direct head-to-head contact. One study found that transmission is most likely to occur when hairs are arranged in a parallel alignment and move slowly in relation to one another.¹² Although controversial and probably less notable, transmission also may occur indirectly via fomites or the sharing of hairbrushes, hats, or other headgear.^13,14 Classrooms are a common place for transmission.¹ A 2009 study in Germany found an increase in health department consultations for head lice when schools reopened after vacations. The investigators also found that pediculicide sales peaked from mid-September through October, subsequent to schools reopening after the summer holiday.¹⁵ There is some evidence that overcrowded housing also can lead to increased incidence and transmission.^16,17 There is no consistent correlation of infestation with socioeconomic status.^1,17,18

Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis

Clinically, patients with head lice present with scalp pruritus and sometimes posterior cervical or occipital lymphadenopathy. Pediculosis also can be asymptomatic. With the first exposure, symptoms may not develop for up to 4 to 6 weeks as the immune system develops sensitivity to the louse saliva.⁶ Bite reactions consisting of papules or wheals are related to immune sensitization.⁵ Louse feces and excoriations from scratching to relieve itch also may be present on examination. Secondary infection of excoriations also is possible.¹

Diagnosis of an active infestation is made by identifying living lice. Because lice move quickly and can be difficult to detect, tightly attached nits on the hair shaft within 4 mm of the scalp are at least indicative of a historic infestation and can be suggestive of active infestation.^1,19 Dermoscopy is a helpful tool in differentiating eggs containing nymphs from the empty cases of hatched lice and also from amorphous pseudonits (hair casts)(Figure 3).^19,20 Wet combing improves the accuracy of diagnosing an active infection.²¹

Treatment

Effective treatment of head lice requires eradication of all living lice as well as louse eggs. Topically applied pyrethroids, including pyrethrin shampoos and mousses and permethrin lotion 1%, are considered the first-line therapy.⁸ Pyrethroids are over-the-counter treatments that act by interfering with sodium transport in the louse, causing depolarization of the neuromembranes and respiratory paralysis.²² Pyrethrins are natural compounds derived from the chrysanthemum plant; permethrin is a synthetic compound. Pyrethrins often are combined with piperonyl butoxide, an insecticide synergist that improves efficacy by inhibiting pyrethrin catabolism.²³ Resistance to pyrethroids has become an increasingly important problem in the United States and worldwide.

Malathion lotion 0.5% is another therapeutic option for head lice. Malathion is a prescription organophosphate cholinesterase inhibitor that also causes respiratory paralysis of the louse and is one of the few treatments that is ovicidal.²² It was withdrawn from the market in 1995 due to its flammability and a theoretical risk of respiratory depression if ingested; however, it was reintroduced in 1999 and remains an effective treatment option with little resistance in the United States.²⁴

Lindane 1% (shampoo and lotion), an organochloride compound that acts by causing neuronal hyperstimulation and eventual paralysis of lice, is no longer recommended due to its serious side effects, including central nervous system toxicity and increased risk of seizure.^8,24

New US Food and Drug Administration–Approved Therapies
Newer topical treatments include benzyl alcohol lotion 5%, spinosad topical suspension 0.9%, ivermectin lotion 0.5%, and dimethicone-based products. Benzyl alcohol was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2009 and is available in the United States by prescription.²⁵ Benzyl alcohol kills lice by asphyxiation. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials showed significant treatment success 1 day posttreatment (fewer live lice than the vehicle alone; P=.004) and 2 weeks posttreatment (absence of live lice compared to the vehicle alone; P=.001).²⁶

Spinosad was approved by the FDA in 2011 and is available in the United States by prescription.²⁵ It contains the compounds spinosyn A and spinosyn D, which are naturally derived through fermentation by the soil bacterium Saccharopolyspora spinosa. It also contains benzyl alcohol. Spinosad paralyzes lice by disrupting neuronal activity and is at least partially ovicidal.²⁷ Phase 3 clinical trials published in 2009 showed that spinosad was significantly more effective than permethrin in eradicating head lice (P<.001).²⁸

Topical ivermectin was approved by the FDA in 2012 for prescription use.²⁵ It acts on chloride ion channels, causing hyperpolarization of the muscle cells of lice and resulting in paralysis and death. Oral ivermectin (200 μg/kg) given once and repeated in 10 days is not FDA approved for the treatment of head lice but has shown some effectiveness and is sometimes used.⁸ A comparison study of topical versus oral ivermectin published in 2014 found that eradication was achieved in 88% (n=27) of topical ivermectin users after 1 treatment and 100% (n=31) after 2 treatments. Oral ivermectin produced cure rates of 45% (n=14) after 1 treatment and 97% (n=30) after 2 treatments. Both topical and oral ivermectin treatments are well tolerated.²⁹

Physically Acting Preparations
Products with a physical mode of action are a new attractive option for treatment of pediculosis because the development of resistance is less likely. Studies of silicone-based fluids that physically occlude the respiratory system of the louse, such as dimethicone liquid gel 4%, have shown superiority over treatment with pyrethroids.^30,31 Although the safety of dimethicone has been demonstrated, silicone-based treatments have not yet been widely adopted in the United States and are not currently used as a first-line treatment.³² However, use of such physically acting pediculicides may in time surpass traditional neurotoxic treatments due to their low susceptibility to resistance and good safety profile.^33,34

Alternative Therapies
Nonchemical treatments for head lice that have shown variable success include wet combing, hot air treatments, and varying occlusive treatments. Physical removal via wet combing requires persistent repeated treatments over several weeks; for example, wet combing may be performed every 3 days for at least 2 weeks or until no head lice are detected on 4 consecutive occasions.³⁵ Cure rates range from 38% to 75% with wet combing as a sole treatment of head lice.³⁶ Because this treatment has minimal risks and no adverse side effects, it can be considered as an alternative treatment for some patients.

Hot air treatments also have been studied. A 2006 study showed that a hot air treatment device had the potential to eradicate head lice, most likely by desiccation. Specifically, 30 minutes of exposure to hot air (at 58.9°F, slightly cooler than a standard hair dryer) using the custom-built device resulted in 98% mortality of eggs and 80% mortality of hatched lice.³⁷ Large randomized controlled trials of hot air treatments have not been performed.

Other alternative treatments include plant-derived oils. A laboratory study of essential oils found that spearmint, cassia, and clove showed pediculicidal activity similar to malathion with improved ovicidal activity.³⁸ However, there is a potential for development of contact dermatitis from essential oils.

Complete Eradication of Head Lice
Removal of nits is an important component of effective lice eradication. Biochemical analysis has revealed that the nit sheath of the head louse is similar in composition to amyloid, rendering it difficult to design products that will unravel the nit sheath while leaving human hair undamaged.³⁹ Because pediculicides are not necessarily ovicidal and complete physical nit removal is difficult to achieve, re-treatment in 7 to 10 days often is advisable to ensure that lice in all stages of the life cycle have been killed.⁴ Treatment of any secondary bacterial infection also is important. Although transmission of lice via fomites is less likely than from head-to-head contact, the cleaning of hats, hairbrushes, and linens is prudent. Diagnosing and treating infested close contacts also is essential to achieving eradication.⁴ Coordinated surveillance, education, and treatment efforts in high-risk communities can help detect asymptomatic cases and control local epidemics in a cost-effective manner.⁴⁰ However, “no nit” policies at schools likely cause a net harm, as nit removal is difficult and children with nonviable nits are then excluded from the classroom.⁵

Treatment Resistance
Resistance to topical neurotoxic treatments is becoming increasingly common.^41-43 Therefore, it is important to identify local patterns of resistance, if possible, when selecting a therapy for head lice. Improper usage, changes in pediculicide formulations and packaging, decreased product efficacy, and natural selection have all contributed to this rise in resistance.⁷ Additionally, due to protection from multiple exoskeletons and the natural molting process as they mature into adults, nymphs may only receive a sublethal dose when exposed to pediculicides, contributing further to resistance.⁷ Resistance to synthetic pyrethroids is most predominant, likely due to selection pressure because permethrin historically has been the most widely used insecticide for pediculosis. A 2014 study found that the frequency of sodium-channel insensitivity to pyrethroids, also known as knockdown resistance (or kdr), in US head louse populations collected over a 10-year period was 84.4% and approached 100% in some communities in recent years.⁴⁴ This evidence strongly supports the use of alternative therapeutic categories to effectively eradicate head lice infestations.

Conclusion

Head lice infestation is common in children, and although it is not harmful to the host, it can be an irritating and symptomatic problem and can lead to notable distress, missed days of school, and secondary infections. Identifying active adult lice is the gold standard for diagnosis. Current recommended treatments include pyrethroids as the first-line therapy; however, resistance to these neurotoxic agents is becoming increasingly common. Alternative therapies such as newer neurotoxic agents or pediculicides with physical mechanisms of action (eg, dimethicone-based products) should be considered, particularly in regions where resistance is known to be high. Education about head lice, proper use of treatment, and coordinated diagnosis are necessary for effective management of this problem.

The head louse (Pediculus humanus capitis) is a blood-sucking arthropod of the suborder Anoplura. Lice are obligate human parasites that have infested humans since antiquity. Pediculosis capitis is an infestation of the scalp by head lice. It is estimated that 6 to 12 million individuals in the United States are affected with head lice per year.¹ Resistance to topical chemical pediculicides is widespread, and new agents have been developed to address this gap in care.

Characteristics of Head Lice

The head louse is a tan-gray–colored, wingless insect measuring approximately 2- to 3-mm long with 3 body segments. It has 6 legs with claws used to grasp individual hairs, and it moves by crawling; it does not fly or jump.^2,3 The head louse has an elongated abdomen and a small head with short antennae and anterior piercing mouthparts (Figure 1).⁴ Nits are transparent, flask-shaped, 0.5- to 0.8-mm egg cases found firmly cemented to the hair shafts approximately 1 to 4 mm above the level of the scalp (Figure 2).⁵ The head louse resides on scalp hair and feeds off the scalp itself. Both lice and nits can be present throughout the scalp but are most commonly found in the postauricular and occipital scalp.^3,4

Female lice live approximately 30 days and lay 5 to 10 eggs per day. Eggs incubate individually in nits laid close to the scalp for 8 to 10 days before hatching.^1,6 The newly hatched nymphs (also called instars) have multiple exoskeletons that are shed as they grow.⁷ Nymphs mature into adults in approximately 2 weeks, and the life cycle begins again.⁸ Head lice are obligate human parasites, feeding approximately every 4 to 6 hours on the blood of the host; however, they can survive up to 4 days without a blood meal on fomites if the climate and conditions are favorable.^5,9

Epidemiology and Transmission

Head lice infestations commonly occur in children aged 3 to 11 years and are more prevalent in girls and women.^1,10 Infestation rates are not reliably recorded, and few population-based studies have been performed; however, it is estimated that 6 to 12 million individuals are infested annually in the United States.¹ Prevalence in some European populations has been estimated to range from 1% to 20%.¹¹ A 2008 literature review found that worldwide prevalence varied across populations from 0.7% to 59%.¹⁰

Transmission occurs most frequently from direct head-to-head contact. One study found that transmission is most likely to occur when hairs are arranged in a parallel alignment and move slowly in relation to one another.¹² Although controversial and probably less notable, transmission also may occur indirectly via fomites or the sharing of hairbrushes, hats, or other headgear.^13,14 Classrooms are a common place for transmission.¹ A 2009 study in Germany found an increase in health department consultations for head lice when schools reopened after vacations. The investigators also found that pediculicide sales peaked from mid-September through October, subsequent to schools reopening after the summer holiday.¹⁵ There is some evidence that overcrowded housing also can lead to increased incidence and transmission.^16,17 There is no consistent correlation of infestation with socioeconomic status.^1,17,18

Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis

Clinically, patients with head lice present with scalp pruritus and sometimes posterior cervical or occipital lymphadenopathy. Pediculosis also can be asymptomatic. With the first exposure, symptoms may not develop for up to 4 to 6 weeks as the immune system develops sensitivity to the louse saliva.⁶ Bite reactions consisting of papules or wheals are related to immune sensitization.⁵ Louse feces and excoriations from scratching to relieve itch also may be present on examination. Secondary infection of excoriations also is possible.¹

Diagnosis of an active infestation is made by identifying living lice. Because lice move quickly and can be difficult to detect, tightly attached nits on the hair shaft within 4 mm of the scalp are at least indicative of a historic infestation and can be suggestive of active infestation.^1,19 Dermoscopy is a helpful tool in differentiating eggs containing nymphs from the empty cases of hatched lice and also from amorphous pseudonits (hair casts)(Figure 3).^19,20 Wet combing improves the accuracy of diagnosing an active infection.²¹

Treatment

Effective treatment of head lice requires eradication of all living lice as well as louse eggs. Topically applied pyrethroids, including pyrethrin shampoos and mousses and permethrin lotion 1%, are considered the first-line therapy.⁸ Pyrethroids are over-the-counter treatments that act by interfering with sodium transport in the louse, causing depolarization of the neuromembranes and respiratory paralysis.²² Pyrethrins are natural compounds derived from the chrysanthemum plant; permethrin is a synthetic compound. Pyrethrins often are combined with piperonyl butoxide, an insecticide synergist that improves efficacy by inhibiting pyrethrin catabolism.²³ Resistance to pyrethroids has become an increasingly important problem in the United States and worldwide.

Malathion lotion 0.5% is another therapeutic option for head lice. Malathion is a prescription organophosphate cholinesterase inhibitor that also causes respiratory paralysis of the louse and is one of the few treatments that is ovicidal.²² It was withdrawn from the market in 1995 due to its flammability and a theoretical risk of respiratory depression if ingested; however, it was reintroduced in 1999 and remains an effective treatment option with little resistance in the United States.²⁴

Lindane 1% (shampoo and lotion), an organochloride compound that acts by causing neuronal hyperstimulation and eventual paralysis of lice, is no longer recommended due to its serious side effects, including central nervous system toxicity and increased risk of seizure.^8,24

New US Food and Drug Administration–Approved Therapies
Newer topical treatments include benzyl alcohol lotion 5%, spinosad topical suspension 0.9%, ivermectin lotion 0.5%, and dimethicone-based products. Benzyl alcohol was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2009 and is available in the United States by prescription.²⁵ Benzyl alcohol kills lice by asphyxiation. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials showed significant treatment success 1 day posttreatment (fewer live lice than the vehicle alone; P=.004) and 2 weeks posttreatment (absence of live lice compared to the vehicle alone; P=.001).²⁶

Spinosad was approved by the FDA in 2011 and is available in the United States by prescription.²⁵ It contains the compounds spinosyn A and spinosyn D, which are naturally derived through fermentation by the soil bacterium Saccharopolyspora spinosa. It also contains benzyl alcohol. Spinosad paralyzes lice by disrupting neuronal activity and is at least partially ovicidal.²⁷ Phase 3 clinical trials published in 2009 showed that spinosad was significantly more effective than permethrin in eradicating head lice (P<.001).²⁸

Topical ivermectin was approved by the FDA in 2012 for prescription use.²⁵ It acts on chloride ion channels, causing hyperpolarization of the muscle cells of lice and resulting in paralysis and death. Oral ivermectin (200 μg/kg) given once and repeated in 10 days is not FDA approved for the treatment of head lice but has shown some effectiveness and is sometimes used.⁸ A comparison study of topical versus oral ivermectin published in 2014 found that eradication was achieved in 88% (n=27) of topical ivermectin users after 1 treatment and 100% (n=31) after 2 treatments. Oral ivermectin produced cure rates of 45% (n=14) after 1 treatment and 97% (n=30) after 2 treatments. Both topical and oral ivermectin treatments are well tolerated.²⁹

Physically Acting Preparations
Products with a physical mode of action are a new attractive option for treatment of pediculosis because the development of resistance is less likely. Studies of silicone-based fluids that physically occlude the respiratory system of the louse, such as dimethicone liquid gel 4%, have shown superiority over treatment with pyrethroids.^30,31 Although the safety of dimethicone has been demonstrated, silicone-based treatments have not yet been widely adopted in the United States and are not currently used as a first-line treatment.³² However, use of such physically acting pediculicides may in time surpass traditional neurotoxic treatments due to their low susceptibility to resistance and good safety profile.^33,34

Alternative Therapies
Nonchemical treatments for head lice that have shown variable success include wet combing, hot air treatments, and varying occlusive treatments. Physical removal via wet combing requires persistent repeated treatments over several weeks; for example, wet combing may be performed every 3 days for at least 2 weeks or until no head lice are detected on 4 consecutive occasions.³⁵ Cure rates range from 38% to 75% with wet combing as a sole treatment of head lice.³⁶ Because this treatment has minimal risks and no adverse side effects, it can be considered as an alternative treatment for some patients.

Hot air treatments also have been studied. A 2006 study showed that a hot air treatment device had the potential to eradicate head lice, most likely by desiccation. Specifically, 30 minutes of exposure to hot air (at 58.9°F, slightly cooler than a standard hair dryer) using the custom-built device resulted in 98% mortality of eggs and 80% mortality of hatched lice.³⁷ Large randomized controlled trials of hot air treatments have not been performed.

Other alternative treatments include plant-derived oils. A laboratory study of essential oils found that spearmint, cassia, and clove showed pediculicidal activity similar to malathion with improved ovicidal activity.³⁸ However, there is a potential for development of contact dermatitis from essential oils.

Complete Eradication of Head Lice
Removal of nits is an important component of effective lice eradication. Biochemical analysis has revealed that the nit sheath of the head louse is similar in composition to amyloid, rendering it difficult to design products that will unravel the nit sheath while leaving human hair undamaged.³⁹ Because pediculicides are not necessarily ovicidal and complete physical nit removal is difficult to achieve, re-treatment in 7 to 10 days often is advisable to ensure that lice in all stages of the life cycle have been killed.⁴ Treatment of any secondary bacterial infection also is important. Although transmission of lice via fomites is less likely than from head-to-head contact, the cleaning of hats, hairbrushes, and linens is prudent. Diagnosing and treating infested close contacts also is essential to achieving eradication.⁴ Coordinated surveillance, education, and treatment efforts in high-risk communities can help detect asymptomatic cases and control local epidemics in a cost-effective manner.⁴⁰ However, “no nit” policies at schools likely cause a net harm, as nit removal is difficult and children with nonviable nits are then excluded from the classroom.⁵

Treatment Resistance
Resistance to topical neurotoxic treatments is becoming increasingly common.^41-43 Therefore, it is important to identify local patterns of resistance, if possible, when selecting a therapy for head lice. Improper usage, changes in pediculicide formulations and packaging, decreased product efficacy, and natural selection have all contributed to this rise in resistance.⁷ Additionally, due to protection from multiple exoskeletons and the natural molting process as they mature into adults, nymphs may only receive a sublethal dose when exposed to pediculicides, contributing further to resistance.⁷ Resistance to synthetic pyrethroids is most predominant, likely due to selection pressure because permethrin historically has been the most widely used insecticide for pediculosis. A 2014 study found that the frequency of sodium-channel insensitivity to pyrethroids, also known as knockdown resistance (or kdr), in US head louse populations collected over a 10-year period was 84.4% and approached 100% in some communities in recent years.⁴⁴ This evidence strongly supports the use of alternative therapeutic categories to effectively eradicate head lice infestations.

Conclusion

Head lice infestation is common in children, and although it is not harmful to the host, it can be an irritating and symptomatic problem and can lead to notable distress, missed days of school, and secondary infections. Identifying active adult lice is the gold standard for diagnosis. Current recommended treatments include pyrethroids as the first-line therapy; however, resistance to these neurotoxic agents is becoming increasingly common. Alternative therapies such as newer neurotoxic agents or pediculicides with physical mechanisms of action (eg, dimethicone-based products) should be considered, particularly in regions where resistance is known to be high. Education about head lice, proper use of treatment, and coordinated diagnosis are necessary for effective management of this problem.

The head louse (Pediculus humanus capitis) is a blood-sucking arthropod of the suborder Anoplura. Lice are obligate human parasites that have infested humans since antiquity. Pediculosis capitis is an infestation of the scalp by head lice. It is estimated that 6 to 12 million individuals in the United States are affected with head lice per year.¹ Resistance to topical chemical pediculicides is widespread, and new agents have been developed to address this gap in care.

Characteristics of Head Lice

The head louse is a tan-gray–colored, wingless insect measuring approximately 2- to 3-mm long with 3 body segments. It has 6 legs with claws used to grasp individual hairs, and it moves by crawling; it does not fly or jump.^2,3 The head louse has an elongated abdomen and a small head with short antennae and anterior piercing mouthparts (Figure 1).⁴ Nits are transparent, flask-shaped, 0.5- to 0.8-mm egg cases found firmly cemented to the hair shafts approximately 1 to 4 mm above the level of the scalp (Figure 2).⁵ The head louse resides on scalp hair and feeds off the scalp itself. Both lice and nits can be present throughout the scalp but are most commonly found in the postauricular and occipital scalp.^3,4

Female lice live approximately 30 days and lay 5 to 10 eggs per day. Eggs incubate individually in nits laid close to the scalp for 8 to 10 days before hatching.^1,6 The newly hatched nymphs (also called instars) have multiple exoskeletons that are shed as they grow.⁷ Nymphs mature into adults in approximately 2 weeks, and the life cycle begins again.⁸ Head lice are obligate human parasites, feeding approximately every 4 to 6 hours on the blood of the host; however, they can survive up to 4 days without a blood meal on fomites if the climate and conditions are favorable.^5,9

Epidemiology and Transmission

Head lice infestations commonly occur in children aged 3 to 11 years and are more prevalent in girls and women.^1,10 Infestation rates are not reliably recorded, and few population-based studies have been performed; however, it is estimated that 6 to 12 million individuals are infested annually in the United States.¹ Prevalence in some European populations has been estimated to range from 1% to 20%.¹¹ A 2008 literature review found that worldwide prevalence varied across populations from 0.7% to 59%.¹⁰

Transmission occurs most frequently from direct head-to-head contact. One study found that transmission is most likely to occur when hairs are arranged in a parallel alignment and move slowly in relation to one another.¹² Although controversial and probably less notable, transmission also may occur indirectly via fomites or the sharing of hairbrushes, hats, or other headgear.^13,14 Classrooms are a common place for transmission.¹ A 2009 study in Germany found an increase in health department consultations for head lice when schools reopened after vacations. The investigators also found that pediculicide sales peaked from mid-September through October, subsequent to schools reopening after the summer holiday.¹⁵ There is some evidence that overcrowded housing also can lead to increased incidence and transmission.^16,17 There is no consistent correlation of infestation with socioeconomic status.^1,17,18

Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis

Clinically, patients with head lice present with scalp pruritus and sometimes posterior cervical or occipital lymphadenopathy. Pediculosis also can be asymptomatic. With the first exposure, symptoms may not develop for up to 4 to 6 weeks as the immune system develops sensitivity to the louse saliva.⁶ Bite reactions consisting of papules or wheals are related to immune sensitization.⁵ Louse feces and excoriations from scratching to relieve itch also may be present on examination. Secondary infection of excoriations also is possible.¹

Diagnosis of an active infestation is made by identifying living lice. Because lice move quickly and can be difficult to detect, tightly attached nits on the hair shaft within 4 mm of the scalp are at least indicative of a historic infestation and can be suggestive of active infestation.^1,19 Dermoscopy is a helpful tool in differentiating eggs containing nymphs from the empty cases of hatched lice and also from amorphous pseudonits (hair casts)(Figure 3).^19,20 Wet combing improves the accuracy of diagnosing an active infection.²¹

Treatment

Effective treatment of head lice requires eradication of all living lice as well as louse eggs. Topically applied pyrethroids, including pyrethrin shampoos and mousses and permethrin lotion 1%, are considered the first-line therapy.⁸ Pyrethroids are over-the-counter treatments that act by interfering with sodium transport in the louse, causing depolarization of the neuromembranes and respiratory paralysis.²² Pyrethrins are natural compounds derived from the chrysanthemum plant; permethrin is a synthetic compound. Pyrethrins often are combined with piperonyl butoxide, an insecticide synergist that improves efficacy by inhibiting pyrethrin catabolism.²³ Resistance to pyrethroids has become an increasingly important problem in the United States and worldwide.

Malathion lotion 0.5% is another therapeutic option for head lice. Malathion is a prescription organophosphate cholinesterase inhibitor that also causes respiratory paralysis of the louse and is one of the few treatments that is ovicidal.²² It was withdrawn from the market in 1995 due to its flammability and a theoretical risk of respiratory depression if ingested; however, it was reintroduced in 1999 and remains an effective treatment option with little resistance in the United States.²⁴

Lindane 1% (shampoo and lotion), an organochloride compound that acts by causing neuronal hyperstimulation and eventual paralysis of lice, is no longer recommended due to its serious side effects, including central nervous system toxicity and increased risk of seizure.^8,24

New US Food and Drug Administration–Approved Therapies
Newer topical treatments include benzyl alcohol lotion 5%, spinosad topical suspension 0.9%, ivermectin lotion 0.5%, and dimethicone-based products. Benzyl alcohol was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2009 and is available in the United States by prescription.²⁵ Benzyl alcohol kills lice by asphyxiation. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials showed significant treatment success 1 day posttreatment (fewer live lice than the vehicle alone; P=.004) and 2 weeks posttreatment (absence of live lice compared to the vehicle alone; P=.001).²⁶

Spinosad was approved by the FDA in 2011 and is available in the United States by prescription.²⁵ It contains the compounds spinosyn A and spinosyn D, which are naturally derived through fermentation by the soil bacterium Saccharopolyspora spinosa. It also contains benzyl alcohol. Spinosad paralyzes lice by disrupting neuronal activity and is at least partially ovicidal.²⁷ Phase 3 clinical trials published in 2009 showed that spinosad was significantly more effective than permethrin in eradicating head lice (P<.001).²⁸

Topical ivermectin was approved by the FDA in 2012 for prescription use.²⁵ It acts on chloride ion channels, causing hyperpolarization of the muscle cells of lice and resulting in paralysis and death. Oral ivermectin (200 μg/kg) given once and repeated in 10 days is not FDA approved for the treatment of head lice but has shown some effectiveness and is sometimes used.⁸ A comparison study of topical versus oral ivermectin published in 2014 found that eradication was achieved in 88% (n=27) of topical ivermectin users after 1 treatment and 100% (n=31) after 2 treatments. Oral ivermectin produced cure rates of 45% (n=14) after 1 treatment and 97% (n=30) after 2 treatments. Both topical and oral ivermectin treatments are well tolerated.²⁹

Physically Acting Preparations
Products with a physical mode of action are a new attractive option for treatment of pediculosis because the development of resistance is less likely. Studies of silicone-based fluids that physically occlude the respiratory system of the louse, such as dimethicone liquid gel 4%, have shown superiority over treatment with pyrethroids.^30,31 Although the safety of dimethicone has been demonstrated, silicone-based treatments have not yet been widely adopted in the United States and are not currently used as a first-line treatment.³² However, use of such physically acting pediculicides may in time surpass traditional neurotoxic treatments due to their low susceptibility to resistance and good safety profile.^33,34

Alternative Therapies
Nonchemical treatments for head lice that have shown variable success include wet combing, hot air treatments, and varying occlusive treatments. Physical removal via wet combing requires persistent repeated treatments over several weeks; for example, wet combing may be performed every 3 days for at least 2 weeks or until no head lice are detected on 4 consecutive occasions.³⁵ Cure rates range from 38% to 75% with wet combing as a sole treatment of head lice.³⁶ Because this treatment has minimal risks and no adverse side effects, it can be considered as an alternative treatment for some patients.

Hot air treatments also have been studied. A 2006 study showed that a hot air treatment device had the potential to eradicate head lice, most likely by desiccation. Specifically, 30 minutes of exposure to hot air (at 58.9°F, slightly cooler than a standard hair dryer) using the custom-built device resulted in 98% mortality of eggs and 80% mortality of hatched lice.³⁷ Large randomized controlled trials of hot air treatments have not been performed.

Other alternative treatments include plant-derived oils. A laboratory study of essential oils found that spearmint, cassia, and clove showed pediculicidal activity similar to malathion with improved ovicidal activity.³⁸ However, there is a potential for development of contact dermatitis from essential oils.

Complete Eradication of Head Lice
Removal of nits is an important component of effective lice eradication. Biochemical analysis has revealed that the nit sheath of the head louse is similar in composition to amyloid, rendering it difficult to design products that will unravel the nit sheath while leaving human hair undamaged.³⁹ Because pediculicides are not necessarily ovicidal and complete physical nit removal is difficult to achieve, re-treatment in 7 to 10 days often is advisable to ensure that lice in all stages of the life cycle have been killed.⁴ Treatment of any secondary bacterial infection also is important. Although transmission of lice via fomites is less likely than from head-to-head contact, the cleaning of hats, hairbrushes, and linens is prudent. Diagnosing and treating infested close contacts also is essential to achieving eradication.⁴ Coordinated surveillance, education, and treatment efforts in high-risk communities can help detect asymptomatic cases and control local epidemics in a cost-effective manner.⁴⁰ However, “no nit” policies at schools likely cause a net harm, as nit removal is difficult and children with nonviable nits are then excluded from the classroom.⁵

Treatment Resistance
Resistance to topical neurotoxic treatments is becoming increasingly common.^41-43 Therefore, it is important to identify local patterns of resistance, if possible, when selecting a therapy for head lice. Improper usage, changes in pediculicide formulations and packaging, decreased product efficacy, and natural selection have all contributed to this rise in resistance.⁷ Additionally, due to protection from multiple exoskeletons and the natural molting process as they mature into adults, nymphs may only receive a sublethal dose when exposed to pediculicides, contributing further to resistance.⁷ Resistance to synthetic pyrethroids is most predominant, likely due to selection pressure because permethrin historically has been the most widely used insecticide for pediculosis. A 2014 study found that the frequency of sodium-channel insensitivity to pyrethroids, also known as knockdown resistance (or kdr), in US head louse populations collected over a 10-year period was 84.4% and approached 100% in some communities in recent years.⁴⁴ This evidence strongly supports the use of alternative therapeutic categories to effectively eradicate head lice infestations.

Conclusion

Head lice infestation is common in children, and although it is not harmful to the host, it can be an irritating and symptomatic problem and can lead to notable distress, missed days of school, and secondary infections. Identifying active adult lice is the gold standard for diagnosis. Current recommended treatments include pyrethroids as the first-line therapy; however, resistance to these neurotoxic agents is becoming increasingly common. Alternative therapies such as newer neurotoxic agents or pediculicides with physical mechanisms of action (eg, dimethicone-based products) should be considered, particularly in regions where resistance is known to be high. Education about head lice, proper use of treatment, and coordinated diagnosis are necessary for effective management of this problem.

Scabies is caused by the mite Sarcoptes scabiei var hominis.¹ It is in the arthropod class Arachnida, subclass Acari, and family Sarcoptidae.² Historically, scabies was first described in the Old Testament and by Aristotle,² but the causative organism was not identified until 1687 using a light microscope.³ Scabies affects all age groups, races, and social classes and is globally widespread. It is most prevalent in developing tropical countries.¹ It is estimated that 300 million individuals worldwide are infested with scabies mites annually, with the highest burden in young children.^4-7 In industrialized societies, infections often are seen in young adults and in institutional settings such as nursing homes.⁸ Scabies disproportionately impacts impoverished communities with crowded living conditions, poor hygiene and nutrition, and substandard housing^.5,9 Controlling the spread of the disease in these communities presents challenges but is important because of the connection between scabies and chronic kidney disease.¹⁰ As such, scabies represents a major health problem in the developing world and has been the focus of major health initiatives.^1,11

Identifying Characteristics

Adult females are 0.4-mm long and 0.3-mm wide, with males being smaller. Adult nymphs have 8 legs and larvae have 6 legs. Scabies mites are distinguishable from other arachnids by the position of a distinct gnathosoma and the lack of a division between the abdomen and cephalothorax.¹² They are ovoid with a small anterior cephalic and caudal thoracoabdominal portion with hairlike projections coming off from the rudimentary legs. They can crawl as fast as 2.5 cm per minute on warm skin.² The life cycle of the mite begins after mating: the male mite dies, and the female lays up to 3 eggs per day, which hatch in 3 to 4 days,² in skin burrows within the stratum granulosum.¹² Maturation from larva to adult takes 10 to 14 days.¹² A female mite can live for 4 to 6 weeks and can produce up to 40 ova (Figure 1).

Disease Transmission

Without a host, mites are able to survive and remain capable of infestation for 24 to 36 hours at 21°C and 40% to 80% relative humidity. Lower temperatures and higher humidity prolong survival, but infectivity decreases the longer they are without a host.¹³

An adult human with ordinary scabies will have an average of 12 adult female mites on the body surface at a given time.¹⁴ However, hundreds of mites can be found in neglected children in underprivileged communities and millions in patients with crusted scabies.¹³ Transmission of typical scabies requires close direct skin-to-skin contact for 15 to 20 minutes.^2,8 Transmission from clothing or fomites are an unlikely source of infestation with the exception of patients who are heavily infested such as in crusted scabies.¹² In adults, sexual contact is an important method of transmission,¹² and patients with scabies should be screened for other sexually transmitted diseases.⁸

Clinical Manifestations

Signs of scabies on the skin include burrows, erythematous papules, and generalized pruritus (Figure 2).¹² The scalp, face, and neck frequently are involved in infants and children,² and the hands, wrists, elbows, genitalia, axillae, umbilicus, belt line, nipples, and buttocks commonly are involved in adults.¹² Itching is characteristically worse at night.⁸ In tropical climates, patients with scabies are predisposed to secondary bacterial skin infections, particularly Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococci). The association between scabies and pyoderma caused by group A streptococci has been well established.^15,16 Mika et al¹⁰ suggested that local complement inhibition plays an important role in the development of pyoderma in scabies-infested skin. A relationship between scabies and poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis (PSGN) has been established.^11,17 An outbreak of PSGN in Brazil following an epidemic of Streptococcus zooepidemicus resulted in a high prevalence of renal abnormalities (mean follow-up, 5.4 years).¹⁸ In an aboriginal population with high rates of end-stage renal disease, follow-up in children 6 to 18 years after an epidemic of PSGN (mean follow-up, 14.6 years) showed that risk for overt proteinuria was more than 6 times greater than in healthy controls (95% confidence interval, 2.2-16.9).¹⁹ Scabies skin infestations and infections are endemic in many remote aboriginal communities²⁰ where 70% of children younger than 2 years have chronic scabies and skin sores.²¹ In Dhaka, an urban slum in Bangladesh, the incidence of at least one scabies infection in children younger than 6 years was 952 per 1000 per year. In urban settlements in Dhaka, 49% (288/589) of infested children were not treated for up to 44 weeks after the characteristic signs and symptoms had developed due to restricted access to health care.²² In Brazil, scabies is hyperendemic in many poor communities and slums and is commonly associated with considerable morbidity.²³ Edison et al²⁴ reported that scabies and bacterial superinfections cause substantial morbidity among American Samoan children, with superinfections present in 53% (604/1139) of children diagnosed with scabies. Steer et al²⁵ found that impetigo and scabies had been underestimated in Fiji where 25.6% and 18.5% of primary school children and 12.2% and 14.0% of infants had impetigo and scabies, respectively. In a systematic review of scabies and impetigo prevalence, Romani et al²⁶ concluded that scabies and associated impetigo are common problems in the developing world that disproportionately affect children and communities in underprivileged areas and tropical countries, with the Pacific and Latin American regions having the highest prevalence of scabies. Scabies represents a major health concern worldwide due to the strong relationship between scabies and secondary infection.²⁷

Prevention and Control in the Developing World

Low-cost diagnostic equipment can play a key role in the definitive diagnosis and management of scabies outbreaks in the developing world. Micali et al²⁸ found that a $30 videomicroscope was as effective in scabies diagnosis as a $20,000 videodermatoscope. Because of the low cost of benzyl benzoate, it is commonly used as a first-line drug in many parts of the world,¹³ whereas permethrin cream 5% is the standard treatment in the developed world.²⁹ Recognition of the role of scabies in patients with pyoderma is key, and one study indicated clinically apparent scabies went unnoticed by physicians in 52% of patients presenting with skin lesions.³⁰ Drug shortages also can contribute to a high prevalence of scabies infestation in the community.³¹ Mass treatment with ivermectin has proven to be an effective means of reducing the prevalence of many parasitic diseases,^1,32,33 and it shows great promise for crusted scabies, institutional outbreaks, and mass administration in highly endemic communites.⁸ However, there is evidence of ivermectin tolerance among mites, which could undermine the success of mass drug administration.³⁴ Another important consideration is population mobility and the risk for rapid reintroduction of scabies infection across regions.³⁵

Complicating disease control are the socioeconomic factors associated with scabies in the developing world. Families with scabies infestation typically do not own their homes, are less likely to have constant electricity, have a lower monthly income, and live in substandard housing.²⁰ Families can spend a substantial part of their household income on treatment, impacting what they can spend on food.^8,11 In addition to medication, control of scabies requires community education and involvement, along with access to primary care and attention to living conditions and environmental factors.^34,36

Scabies is caused by the mite Sarcoptes scabiei var hominis.¹ It is in the arthropod class Arachnida, subclass Acari, and family Sarcoptidae.² Historically, scabies was first described in the Old Testament and by Aristotle,² but the causative organism was not identified until 1687 using a light microscope.³ Scabies affects all age groups, races, and social classes and is globally widespread. It is most prevalent in developing tropical countries.¹ It is estimated that 300 million individuals worldwide are infested with scabies mites annually, with the highest burden in young children.^4-7 In industrialized societies, infections often are seen in young adults and in institutional settings such as nursing homes.⁸ Scabies disproportionately impacts impoverished communities with crowded living conditions, poor hygiene and nutrition, and substandard housing^.5,9 Controlling the spread of the disease in these communities presents challenges but is important because of the connection between scabies and chronic kidney disease.¹⁰ As such, scabies represents a major health problem in the developing world and has been the focus of major health initiatives.^1,11

Identifying Characteristics

Adult females are 0.4-mm long and 0.3-mm wide, with males being smaller. Adult nymphs have 8 legs and larvae have 6 legs. Scabies mites are distinguishable from other arachnids by the position of a distinct gnathosoma and the lack of a division between the abdomen and cephalothorax.¹² They are ovoid with a small anterior cephalic and caudal thoracoabdominal portion with hairlike projections coming off from the rudimentary legs. They can crawl as fast as 2.5 cm per minute on warm skin.² The life cycle of the mite begins after mating: the male mite dies, and the female lays up to 3 eggs per day, which hatch in 3 to 4 days,² in skin burrows within the stratum granulosum.¹² Maturation from larva to adult takes 10 to 14 days.¹² A female mite can live for 4 to 6 weeks and can produce up to 40 ova (Figure 1).

Disease Transmission

Without a host, mites are able to survive and remain capable of infestation for 24 to 36 hours at 21°C and 40% to 80% relative humidity. Lower temperatures and higher humidity prolong survival, but infectivity decreases the longer they are without a host.¹³

An adult human with ordinary scabies will have an average of 12 adult female mites on the body surface at a given time.¹⁴ However, hundreds of mites can be found in neglected children in underprivileged communities and millions in patients with crusted scabies.¹³ Transmission of typical scabies requires close direct skin-to-skin contact for 15 to 20 minutes.^2,8 Transmission from clothing or fomites are an unlikely source of infestation with the exception of patients who are heavily infested such as in crusted scabies.¹² In adults, sexual contact is an important method of transmission,¹² and patients with scabies should be screened for other sexually transmitted diseases.⁸

Clinical Manifestations

Signs of scabies on the skin include burrows, erythematous papules, and generalized pruritus (Figure 2).¹² The scalp, face, and neck frequently are involved in infants and children,² and the hands, wrists, elbows, genitalia, axillae, umbilicus, belt line, nipples, and buttocks commonly are involved in adults.¹² Itching is characteristically worse at night.⁸ In tropical climates, patients with scabies are predisposed to secondary bacterial skin infections, particularly Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococci). The association between scabies and pyoderma caused by group A streptococci has been well established.^15,16 Mika et al¹⁰ suggested that local complement inhibition plays an important role in the development of pyoderma in scabies-infested skin. A relationship between scabies and poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis (PSGN) has been established.^11,17 An outbreak of PSGN in Brazil following an epidemic of Streptococcus zooepidemicus resulted in a high prevalence of renal abnormalities (mean follow-up, 5.4 years).¹⁸ In an aboriginal population with high rates of end-stage renal disease, follow-up in children 6 to 18 years after an epidemic of PSGN (mean follow-up, 14.6 years) showed that risk for overt proteinuria was more than 6 times greater than in healthy controls (95% confidence interval, 2.2-16.9).¹⁹ Scabies skin infestations and infections are endemic in many remote aboriginal communities²⁰ where 70% of children younger than 2 years have chronic scabies and skin sores.²¹ In Dhaka, an urban slum in Bangladesh, the incidence of at least one scabies infection in children younger than 6 years was 952 per 1000 per year. In urban settlements in Dhaka, 49% (288/589) of infested children were not treated for up to 44 weeks after the characteristic signs and symptoms had developed due to restricted access to health care.²² In Brazil, scabies is hyperendemic in many poor communities and slums and is commonly associated with considerable morbidity.²³ Edison et al²⁴ reported that scabies and bacterial superinfections cause substantial morbidity among American Samoan children, with superinfections present in 53% (604/1139) of children diagnosed with scabies. Steer et al²⁵ found that impetigo and scabies had been underestimated in Fiji where 25.6% and 18.5% of primary school children and 12.2% and 14.0% of infants had impetigo and scabies, respectively. In a systematic review of scabies and impetigo prevalence, Romani et al²⁶ concluded that scabies and associated impetigo are common problems in the developing world that disproportionately affect children and communities in underprivileged areas and tropical countries, with the Pacific and Latin American regions having the highest prevalence of scabies. Scabies represents a major health concern worldwide due to the strong relationship between scabies and secondary infection.²⁷

Prevention and Control in the Developing World

Low-cost diagnostic equipment can play a key role in the definitive diagnosis and management of scabies outbreaks in the developing world. Micali et al²⁸ found that a $30 videomicroscope was as effective in scabies diagnosis as a $20,000 videodermatoscope. Because of the low cost of benzyl benzoate, it is commonly used as a first-line drug in many parts of the world,¹³ whereas permethrin cream 5% is the standard treatment in the developed world.²⁹ Recognition of the role of scabies in patients with pyoderma is key, and one study indicated clinically apparent scabies went unnoticed by physicians in 52% of patients presenting with skin lesions.³⁰ Drug shortages also can contribute to a high prevalence of scabies infestation in the community.³¹ Mass treatment with ivermectin has proven to be an effective means of reducing the prevalence of many parasitic diseases,^1,32,33 and it shows great promise for crusted scabies, institutional outbreaks, and mass administration in highly endemic communites.⁸ However, there is evidence of ivermectin tolerance among mites, which could undermine the success of mass drug administration.³⁴ Another important consideration is population mobility and the risk for rapid reintroduction of scabies infection across regions.³⁵

Complicating disease control are the socioeconomic factors associated with scabies in the developing world. Families with scabies infestation typically do not own their homes, are less likely to have constant electricity, have a lower monthly income, and live in substandard housing.²⁰ Families can spend a substantial part of their household income on treatment, impacting what they can spend on food.^8,11 In addition to medication, control of scabies requires community education and involvement, along with access to primary care and attention to living conditions and environmental factors.^34,36

Scabies is caused by the mite Sarcoptes scabiei var hominis.¹ It is in the arthropod class Arachnida, subclass Acari, and family Sarcoptidae.² Historically, scabies was first described in the Old Testament and by Aristotle,² but the causative organism was not identified until 1687 using a light microscope.³ Scabies affects all age groups, races, and social classes and is globally widespread. It is most prevalent in developing tropical countries.¹ It is estimated that 300 million individuals worldwide are infested with scabies mites annually, with the highest burden in young children.^4-7 In industrialized societies, infections often are seen in young adults and in institutional settings such as nursing homes.⁸ Scabies disproportionately impacts impoverished communities with crowded living conditions, poor hygiene and nutrition, and substandard housing^.5,9 Controlling the spread of the disease in these communities presents challenges but is important because of the connection between scabies and chronic kidney disease.¹⁰ As such, scabies represents a major health problem in the developing world and has been the focus of major health initiatives.^1,11

Identifying Characteristics

Adult females are 0.4-mm long and 0.3-mm wide, with males being smaller. Adult nymphs have 8 legs and larvae have 6 legs. Scabies mites are distinguishable from other arachnids by the position of a distinct gnathosoma and the lack of a division between the abdomen and cephalothorax.¹² They are ovoid with a small anterior cephalic and caudal thoracoabdominal portion with hairlike projections coming off from the rudimentary legs. They can crawl as fast as 2.5 cm per minute on warm skin.² The life cycle of the mite begins after mating: the male mite dies, and the female lays up to 3 eggs per day, which hatch in 3 to 4 days,² in skin burrows within the stratum granulosum.¹² Maturation from larva to adult takes 10 to 14 days.¹² A female mite can live for 4 to 6 weeks and can produce up to 40 ova (Figure 1).

Disease Transmission

Without a host, mites are able to survive and remain capable of infestation for 24 to 36 hours at 21°C and 40% to 80% relative humidity. Lower temperatures and higher humidity prolong survival, but infectivity decreases the longer they are without a host.¹³

An adult human with ordinary scabies will have an average of 12 adult female mites on the body surface at a given time.¹⁴ However, hundreds of mites can be found in neglected children in underprivileged communities and millions in patients with crusted scabies.¹³ Transmission of typical scabies requires close direct skin-to-skin contact for 15 to 20 minutes.^2,8 Transmission from clothing or fomites are an unlikely source of infestation with the exception of patients who are heavily infested such as in crusted scabies.¹² In adults, sexual contact is an important method of transmission,¹² and patients with scabies should be screened for other sexually transmitted diseases.⁸

Clinical Manifestations

Signs of scabies on the skin include burrows, erythematous papules, and generalized pruritus (Figure 2).¹² The scalp, face, and neck frequently are involved in infants and children,² and the hands, wrists, elbows, genitalia, axillae, umbilicus, belt line, nipples, and buttocks commonly are involved in adults.¹² Itching is characteristically worse at night.⁸ In tropical climates, patients with scabies are predisposed to secondary bacterial skin infections, particularly Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococci). The association between scabies and pyoderma caused by group A streptococci has been well established.^15,16 Mika et al¹⁰ suggested that local complement inhibition plays an important role in the development of pyoderma in scabies-infested skin. A relationship between scabies and poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis (PSGN) has been established.^11,17 An outbreak of PSGN in Brazil following an epidemic of Streptococcus zooepidemicus resulted in a high prevalence of renal abnormalities (mean follow-up, 5.4 years).¹⁸ In an aboriginal population with high rates of end-stage renal disease, follow-up in children 6 to 18 years after an epidemic of PSGN (mean follow-up, 14.6 years) showed that risk for overt proteinuria was more than 6 times greater than in healthy controls (95% confidence interval, 2.2-16.9).¹⁹ Scabies skin infestations and infections are endemic in many remote aboriginal communities²⁰ where 70% of children younger than 2 years have chronic scabies and skin sores.²¹ In Dhaka, an urban slum in Bangladesh, the incidence of at least one scabies infection in children younger than 6 years was 952 per 1000 per year. In urban settlements in Dhaka, 49% (288/589) of infested children were not treated for up to 44 weeks after the characteristic signs and symptoms had developed due to restricted access to health care.²² In Brazil, scabies is hyperendemic in many poor communities and slums and is commonly associated with considerable morbidity.²³ Edison et al²⁴ reported that scabies and bacterial superinfections cause substantial morbidity among American Samoan children, with superinfections present in 53% (604/1139) of children diagnosed with scabies. Steer et al²⁵ found that impetigo and scabies had been underestimated in Fiji where 25.6% and 18.5% of primary school children and 12.2% and 14.0% of infants had impetigo and scabies, respectively. In a systematic review of scabies and impetigo prevalence, Romani et al²⁶ concluded that scabies and associated impetigo are common problems in the developing world that disproportionately affect children and communities in underprivileged areas and tropical countries, with the Pacific and Latin American regions having the highest prevalence of scabies. Scabies represents a major health concern worldwide due to the strong relationship between scabies and secondary infection.²⁷

Prevention and Control in the Developing World

Low-cost diagnostic equipment can play a key role in the definitive diagnosis and management of scabies outbreaks in the developing world. Micali et al²⁸ found that a $30 videomicroscope was as effective in scabies diagnosis as a $20,000 videodermatoscope. Because of the low cost of benzyl benzoate, it is commonly used as a first-line drug in many parts of the world,¹³ whereas permethrin cream 5% is the standard treatment in the developed world.²⁹ Recognition of the role of scabies in patients with pyoderma is key, and one study indicated clinically apparent scabies went unnoticed by physicians in 52% of patients presenting with skin lesions.³⁰ Drug shortages also can contribute to a high prevalence of scabies infestation in the community.³¹ Mass treatment with ivermectin has proven to be an effective means of reducing the prevalence of many parasitic diseases,^1,32,33 and it shows great promise for crusted scabies, institutional outbreaks, and mass administration in highly endemic communites.⁸ However, there is evidence of ivermectin tolerance among mites, which could undermine the success of mass drug administration.³⁴ Another important consideration is population mobility and the risk for rapid reintroduction of scabies infection across regions.³⁵

Complicating disease control are the socioeconomic factors associated with scabies in the developing world. Families with scabies infestation typically do not own their homes, are less likely to have constant electricity, have a lower monthly income, and live in substandard housing.²⁰ Families can spend a substantial part of their household income on treatment, impacting what they can spend on food.^8,11 In addition to medication, control of scabies requires community education and involvement, along with access to primary care and attention to living conditions and environmental factors.^34,36

Delusional infestation is the fixed false belief of skin infestation with a pathogen. Patients will often bring “proof” of their infestation to their visit to a physician. The presentation of a specimen was previously referred to by several names that reflected the receptacle that the patient utilized to bring the specimen (eg, a baggie or matchbox), but now the more encompassing term specimen sign is employed.¹ Establishing rapport with the patient is critically important in the treatment of delusional infestation. Examining the specimen samples brought by the patient is a simple manner of communicating to a patient that the clinician is empathetic to and respectful of his/her concerns.^2,3 The specimens often consist of dirt, dust, debris, fibers, and skin flakes and fragments, but they also have been reported to contain flies and insect parts.^4,5 In our case, the patient captured a minute brown scavenger beetle with adhesive tape.

Case Report

A woman in her mid-30s with a history of generalized anxiety disorder presented to the dermatology clinic with a concern of bugs infesting her skin. The symptoms occurred just after she moved into a new home with her family approximately 4 months prior to presentation. She felt the home was not cleaned properly, but they could not afford to move. She reported a crawling sensation that she identified as bugs biting her all over her body. Prior to presentation in the dermatology clinic, she and her family were treated by primary care for scabies 3 times with permethrin cream, and she was prescribed 1 course of oral ivermectin. She reported seeing bugs all over her house, which led her to clean her home and clothing many times. She was more concerned now because she thought her 2 children also were starting to be affected.

Physical examination revealed pressured speech, and the patient became tearful several times. The skin demonstrated several excoriations in various stages of healing on the breasts, legs, and upper back, as well as small scars in the same distribution. She brought several specimens stuck to clear tape to the visit. Examination of the specimens revealed fabric fibers; various debris; and a small, brown, 6-legged beetle with punctate indentations in rows along the wing covers (Figure). The head was narrower than the thorax, which was narrower than the abdomen.

We diagnosed the patient with a delusional infestation and discussed the beetle that we saw when examining the specimen the patient brought to the clinic. We provided reassurance that the minute brown scavenger beetle is not pathogenic and was present incidentally. Thus far, the patient has been resistant to initiating specific therapy for the delusional infestation, such as risperidone, olanzapine, or pimozide. We continue regular follow-up appointments with the patient to continue building the therapeutic relationship and revisiting the subject of treatment.

Comment

Minute brown scavenger beetles are arthropod members of the family Latridiidae. They also are commonly referred to as plaster or mold beetles. They are small (0.8–3.0 mm) and can be found in moist environments such as dead and rotting foliage, bird’s nests, debris, moist wallpaper/plaster, and stored products. They feed exclusively on fungus, such as mold and mildew, and pose no threat to humans.⁶ It is important for clinicians to recognize the appearance of the minute brown scavenger beetle so as not to mistake it for a pathogenic arthropod in patients presenting with delusional parasitosis.

Delusional infestation is the fixed false belief of skin infestation with a pathogen. Patients will often bring “proof” of their infestation to their visit to a physician. The presentation of a specimen was previously referred to by several names that reflected the receptacle that the patient utilized to bring the specimen (eg, a baggie or matchbox), but now the more encompassing term specimen sign is employed.¹ Establishing rapport with the patient is critically important in the treatment of delusional infestation. Examining the specimen samples brought by the patient is a simple manner of communicating to a patient that the clinician is empathetic to and respectful of his/her concerns.^2,3 The specimens often consist of dirt, dust, debris, fibers, and skin flakes and fragments, but they also have been reported to contain flies and insect parts.^4,5 In our case, the patient captured a minute brown scavenger beetle with adhesive tape.

Case Report

A woman in her mid-30s with a history of generalized anxiety disorder presented to the dermatology clinic with a concern of bugs infesting her skin. The symptoms occurred just after she moved into a new home with her family approximately 4 months prior to presentation. She felt the home was not cleaned properly, but they could not afford to move. She reported a crawling sensation that she identified as bugs biting her all over her body. Prior to presentation in the dermatology clinic, she and her family were treated by primary care for scabies 3 times with permethrin cream, and she was prescribed 1 course of oral ivermectin. She reported seeing bugs all over her house, which led her to clean her home and clothing many times. She was more concerned now because she thought her 2 children also were starting to be affected.

Physical examination revealed pressured speech, and the patient became tearful several times. The skin demonstrated several excoriations in various stages of healing on the breasts, legs, and upper back, as well as small scars in the same distribution. She brought several specimens stuck to clear tape to the visit. Examination of the specimens revealed fabric fibers; various debris; and a small, brown, 6-legged beetle with punctate indentations in rows along the wing covers (Figure). The head was narrower than the thorax, which was narrower than the abdomen.

We diagnosed the patient with a delusional infestation and discussed the beetle that we saw when examining the specimen the patient brought to the clinic. We provided reassurance that the minute brown scavenger beetle is not pathogenic and was present incidentally. Thus far, the patient has been resistant to initiating specific therapy for the delusional infestation, such as risperidone, olanzapine, or pimozide. We continue regular follow-up appointments with the patient to continue building the therapeutic relationship and revisiting the subject of treatment.

Comment

Minute brown scavenger beetles are arthropod members of the family Latridiidae. They also are commonly referred to as plaster or mold beetles. They are small (0.8–3.0 mm) and can be found in moist environments such as dead and rotting foliage, bird’s nests, debris, moist wallpaper/plaster, and stored products. They feed exclusively on fungus, such as mold and mildew, and pose no threat to humans.⁶ It is important for clinicians to recognize the appearance of the minute brown scavenger beetle so as not to mistake it for a pathogenic arthropod in patients presenting with delusional parasitosis.

Delusional infestation is the fixed false belief of skin infestation with a pathogen. Patients will often bring “proof” of their infestation to their visit to a physician. The presentation of a specimen was previously referred to by several names that reflected the receptacle that the patient utilized to bring the specimen (eg, a baggie or matchbox), but now the more encompassing term specimen sign is employed.¹ Establishing rapport with the patient is critically important in the treatment of delusional infestation. Examining the specimen samples brought by the patient is a simple manner of communicating to a patient that the clinician is empathetic to and respectful of his/her concerns.^2,3 The specimens often consist of dirt, dust, debris, fibers, and skin flakes and fragments, but they also have been reported to contain flies and insect parts.^4,5 In our case, the patient captured a minute brown scavenger beetle with adhesive tape.

Case Report

A woman in her mid-30s with a history of generalized anxiety disorder presented to the dermatology clinic with a concern of bugs infesting her skin. The symptoms occurred just after she moved into a new home with her family approximately 4 months prior to presentation. She felt the home was not cleaned properly, but they could not afford to move. She reported a crawling sensation that she identified as bugs biting her all over her body. Prior to presentation in the dermatology clinic, she and her family were treated by primary care for scabies 3 times with permethrin cream, and she was prescribed 1 course of oral ivermectin. She reported seeing bugs all over her house, which led her to clean her home and clothing many times. She was more concerned now because she thought her 2 children also were starting to be affected.

Physical examination revealed pressured speech, and the patient became tearful several times. The skin demonstrated several excoriations in various stages of healing on the breasts, legs, and upper back, as well as small scars in the same distribution. She brought several specimens stuck to clear tape to the visit. Examination of the specimens revealed fabric fibers; various debris; and a small, brown, 6-legged beetle with punctate indentations in rows along the wing covers (Figure). The head was narrower than the thorax, which was narrower than the abdomen.

We diagnosed the patient with a delusional infestation and discussed the beetle that we saw when examining the specimen the patient brought to the clinic. We provided reassurance that the minute brown scavenger beetle is not pathogenic and was present incidentally. Thus far, the patient has been resistant to initiating specific therapy for the delusional infestation, such as risperidone, olanzapine, or pimozide. We continue regular follow-up appointments with the patient to continue building the therapeutic relationship and revisiting the subject of treatment.

Comment

Minute brown scavenger beetles are arthropod members of the family Latridiidae. They also are commonly referred to as plaster or mold beetles. They are small (0.8–3.0 mm) and can be found in moist environments such as dead and rotting foliage, bird’s nests, debris, moist wallpaper/plaster, and stored products. They feed exclusively on fungus, such as mold and mildew, and pose no threat to humans.⁶ It is important for clinicians to recognize the appearance of the minute brown scavenger beetle so as not to mistake it for a pathogenic arthropod in patients presenting with delusional parasitosis.

Identifying Characteristics

The sticktight flea (Echidnophaga gallinacea) earns its name by embedding its head in the host's skin using broad and serrated laciniae and can feed at one site for up to 19 days.¹ It differs in morphology from dog (Ctenocephalides canis) and cat (Ctenocephalides felis) fleas, lacking genal (mustache area) and promotal (back of the head) ctenidia (combs), and is half the size of the cat flea. It has 2 pairs of setae (hairs) behind the antennae with an anteriorly flattened head (Figure). 

Disease Transmission

Although its primary host is poultry and it also is known as the stickfast or chicken flea, the sticktight flea has been found in many species of birds and mammals, including humans. It is becoming more common in dogs in many parts of the world, including the United States,^2-5 and has been found to be the most common flea on dogs in areas of South Africa.⁶ Other noted hosts of E gallinacea are rodents, cottontail rabbits, cats, ground squirrels, and pigs.^7-14 Human infestation occurs from exposure to affected animals.¹⁵ As blood feeders, fleas have long been known to serve as vectors for many diseases, including bubonic plague, typhus, and tularemia, as well as an intermediate host of the dog tapeworm (Dipylidium caninum).⁵ Rickettsia felis, belonging to the spotted fever group, is an emerging infectious disease in humans commonly found in the cat flea (C felis) but also has been detected in E gallinacea.⁷ Echidnophaga gallinacea is found worldwide in the tropics, subtropics, and temperate zones, and it is the only representative of the genus found in the United States.¹ Given the wide range of wild and domestic animal hosts and wide geographic distribution for E gallinacea, it represents an increasing risk for humans.

Echidnophaga gallinacea favors feeding from fleshy areas without thick fur or plumage. In birds, the area around the eyes, comb, and wattles is included; in dogs, it can be the eyes, in between the toes, and in the genital area.¹ Flea bites cause irritation and itching for hosts including humans, typically resulting in clusters of firm, pruritic, erythematous papules with a central punctum.¹⁵ Severe bites also may lead to bullous lesions. In birds, symptoms can be extreme, with infestation around the eyes leading to swelling and blindness, a decline in egg production, weight loss, and death in young birds.¹ Similar to other fleas, E gallinacea is wingless and depends on jumping onto a host for transmission, which can be from the ground, carpeting and flooring, furniture, or another host. Fleas are champion jumpers (relative to body size) and can jump 100 times their length.¹⁶

Management

Treating sticktight fleas can be tricky, as they embed tightly into the host's skin. Animals should be treated by a qualified veterinarian. Removal of attached fleas in humans requires grasping the flea firmly with tweezers and pulling from the skin. If the infestation is considerable, malathion 5% liquid or gel can be applied. Patients can treat itching with topical steroids and antipruritic creams, and oral antihistamines can be used to relieve symptoms and reduce the likelihood of damaged skin as well as the potential for secondary infection. The flea-infested environment should be treated with insecticides. For treatment of hard surfaces, dichlorvos and propetamphos are effective. Organophosphates work well on fabric and carpeting. Domestic pets and livestock may be treated by a veterinarian with agents such as fipronil, selamectin, imidacloprid, metaflumizone, nitenpyram, lufenuron, methoprene, and pyriproxyfen.
 

Identifying Characteristics

The sticktight flea (Echidnophaga gallinacea) earns its name by embedding its head in the host's skin using broad and serrated laciniae and can feed at one site for up to 19 days.¹ It differs in morphology from dog (Ctenocephalides canis) and cat (Ctenocephalides felis) fleas, lacking genal (mustache area) and promotal (back of the head) ctenidia (combs), and is half the size of the cat flea. It has 2 pairs of setae (hairs) behind the antennae with an anteriorly flattened head (Figure). 

Disease Transmission

Although its primary host is poultry and it also is known as the stickfast or chicken flea, the sticktight flea has been found in many species of birds and mammals, including humans. It is becoming more common in dogs in many parts of the world, including the United States,^2-5 and has been found to be the most common flea on dogs in areas of South Africa.⁶ Other noted hosts of E gallinacea are rodents, cottontail rabbits, cats, ground squirrels, and pigs.^7-14 Human infestation occurs from exposure to affected animals.¹⁵ As blood feeders, fleas have long been known to serve as vectors for many diseases, including bubonic plague, typhus, and tularemia, as well as an intermediate host of the dog tapeworm (Dipylidium caninum).⁵ Rickettsia felis, belonging to the spotted fever group, is an emerging infectious disease in humans commonly found in the cat flea (C felis) but also has been detected in E gallinacea.⁷ Echidnophaga gallinacea is found worldwide in the tropics, subtropics, and temperate zones, and it is the only representative of the genus found in the United States.¹ Given the wide range of wild and domestic animal hosts and wide geographic distribution for E gallinacea, it represents an increasing risk for humans.

Echidnophaga gallinacea favors feeding from fleshy areas without thick fur or plumage. In birds, the area around the eyes, comb, and wattles is included; in dogs, it can be the eyes, in between the toes, and in the genital area.¹ Flea bites cause irritation and itching for hosts including humans, typically resulting in clusters of firm, pruritic, erythematous papules with a central punctum.¹⁵ Severe bites also may lead to bullous lesions. In birds, symptoms can be extreme, with infestation around the eyes leading to swelling and blindness, a decline in egg production, weight loss, and death in young birds.¹ Similar to other fleas, E gallinacea is wingless and depends on jumping onto a host for transmission, which can be from the ground, carpeting and flooring, furniture, or another host. Fleas are champion jumpers (relative to body size) and can jump 100 times their length.¹⁶

Management

Treating sticktight fleas can be tricky, as they embed tightly into the host's skin. Animals should be treated by a qualified veterinarian. Removal of attached fleas in humans requires grasping the flea firmly with tweezers and pulling from the skin. If the infestation is considerable, malathion 5% liquid or gel can be applied. Patients can treat itching with topical steroids and antipruritic creams, and oral antihistamines can be used to relieve symptoms and reduce the likelihood of damaged skin as well as the potential for secondary infection. The flea-infested environment should be treated with insecticides. For treatment of hard surfaces, dichlorvos and propetamphos are effective. Organophosphates work well on fabric and carpeting. Domestic pets and livestock may be treated by a veterinarian with agents such as fipronil, selamectin, imidacloprid, metaflumizone, nitenpyram, lufenuron, methoprene, and pyriproxyfen.
 

Identifying Characteristics

The sticktight flea (Echidnophaga gallinacea) earns its name by embedding its head in the host's skin using broad and serrated laciniae and can feed at one site for up to 19 days.¹ It differs in morphology from dog (Ctenocephalides canis) and cat (Ctenocephalides felis) fleas, lacking genal (mustache area) and promotal (back of the head) ctenidia (combs), and is half the size of the cat flea. It has 2 pairs of setae (hairs) behind the antennae with an anteriorly flattened head (Figure). 

Disease Transmission

Although its primary host is poultry and it also is known as the stickfast or chicken flea, the sticktight flea has been found in many species of birds and mammals, including humans. It is becoming more common in dogs in many parts of the world, including the United States,^2-5 and has been found to be the most common flea on dogs in areas of South Africa.⁶ Other noted hosts of E gallinacea are rodents, cottontail rabbits, cats, ground squirrels, and pigs.^7-14 Human infestation occurs from exposure to affected animals.¹⁵ As blood feeders, fleas have long been known to serve as vectors for many diseases, including bubonic plague, typhus, and tularemia, as well as an intermediate host of the dog tapeworm (Dipylidium caninum).⁵ Rickettsia felis, belonging to the spotted fever group, is an emerging infectious disease in humans commonly found in the cat flea (C felis) but also has been detected in E gallinacea.⁷ Echidnophaga gallinacea is found worldwide in the tropics, subtropics, and temperate zones, and it is the only representative of the genus found in the United States.¹ Given the wide range of wild and domestic animal hosts and wide geographic distribution for E gallinacea, it represents an increasing risk for humans.

Echidnophaga gallinacea favors feeding from fleshy areas without thick fur or plumage. In birds, the area around the eyes, comb, and wattles is included; in dogs, it can be the eyes, in between the toes, and in the genital area.¹ Flea bites cause irritation and itching for hosts including humans, typically resulting in clusters of firm, pruritic, erythematous papules with a central punctum.¹⁵ Severe bites also may lead to bullous lesions. In birds, symptoms can be extreme, with infestation around the eyes leading to swelling and blindness, a decline in egg production, weight loss, and death in young birds.¹ Similar to other fleas, E gallinacea is wingless and depends on jumping onto a host for transmission, which can be from the ground, carpeting and flooring, furniture, or another host. Fleas are champion jumpers (relative to body size) and can jump 100 times their length.¹⁶

Management

Treating sticktight fleas can be tricky, as they embed tightly into the host's skin. Animals should be treated by a qualified veterinarian. Removal of attached fleas in humans requires grasping the flea firmly with tweezers and pulling from the skin. If the infestation is considerable, malathion 5% liquid or gel can be applied. Patients can treat itching with topical steroids and antipruritic creams, and oral antihistamines can be used to relieve symptoms and reduce the likelihood of damaged skin as well as the potential for secondary infection. The flea-infested environment should be treated with insecticides. For treatment of hard surfaces, dichlorvos and propetamphos are effective. Organophosphates work well on fabric and carpeting. Domestic pets and livestock may be treated by a veterinarian with agents such as fipronil, selamectin, imidacloprid, metaflumizone, nitenpyram, lufenuron, methoprene, and pyriproxyfen.
 

Identifying Characteristics and Disease Transmission

Chiggers belong to the Trombiculidae family of mites and also are referred to as harvest mites, harvest bugs, harvest lice, mower’s mites, and redbugs.¹ The term chigger specifically describes the larval stage of this mite’s life cycle, as it is the only stage responsible for chigger bites. The nymph and adult phases feed on vegetable matter. Trombiculid mites are most often found in forests, grassy areas, gardens, and moist areas of soil near bodies of water. Trombicula alfreddugesi is the most common species in the United States, and these mites mainly live in the southeastern and south central regions of the country. Conversely, Trombicula autumnalis is most predominant in Western Europe and East Asia.¹

The life cycle of the mite includes the egg, larval, nymphal, and adult stages.² Due to their need for air humidity greater than 80%, mites lay their eggs on low leaves, blades of grass, or on the ground. They spend most of their lives on vegetation no more than 30 cm above ground level.³ Eggs remain dormant for approximately 6 days until the hatching of the prelarvae, which have 6 legs and are nonfeeding. It takes another 6 days for the prelarvae to mature into larvae. Measuring 0.15 to 0.3 mm in length, mite larvae are a mere fraction of the size of adult mites, which generally are 1 to 2 mm in length, and are bright red or brown-red in color (Figure 1).

The biting larvae have many acceptable hosts including turtles, toads, birds, small mammals, and humans, which act as accidental hosts. Larvae remain on vegetation waiting for a suitable host to pass by so they may attach to its skin and remain there for several days. In the exploration for an ideal area to begin feeding (eg, thin epidermis,⁴ localized increased air humidity⁵), larvae can travel extensively on the skin; however, they often are stopped by tight-fitting sections of clothing (eg, waistbands), so bites are mostly found in clusters. To feed, mite larvae latch onto the skin using chelicerae, jawlike appendages found in the front of the mouth in arachnids.⁶ They then inject digestive enzymes that liquefy epidermal cells on direct contact, which results in the formation of a stylostome from which the mites may suck up lymph fluid and broken down tissue.⁷ Although the actual initial bite is painless, this feeding process leads to the localized inflammation and irritation noticed by infested patients.⁸

The classic clinical presentation includes severe pruritus and cutaneous swelling as well as erythema caused by the combination of several factors, such as enzyme-induced cellular mechanical damage, human immune response, and sometimes a superimposed bacterial infection. Papules and papulovesicles appear in groups, most commonly affecting the legs and waistline (Figure 2).⁹ Itching generally occurs within hours of larval latching and subsides within 72 hours. Cutaneous lesions typically take 1 to 2 weeks to heal. In some rare cases, patients may react with urticarial, bullous, or morbilliform eruptions, and the inflammation and pruritus can last for weeks.⁶ Summer penile syndrome has been noted in boys who display a local hypersensitivity to chigger bites.¹⁰ This syndrome represents a triad of penile swelling, dysuria, and pruritus, which lasts for a few days to a few weeks.

Disease Management

Because the lesions are self-healing, treatment is focused on symptomatic relief of itching by means of topical antipruritics (eg, camphor and menthol, pramoxine lotion) or oral antihistamines (eg, diphenhydramine, hydroxyzine). Potent topical corticosteroids may be used to alleviate inflammation and pruritus, especially when occluded under plastic wrap to increase absorption. In severe cases, an intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (2.5–5 mg/mL) injection may be required.⁹ The best practice, however, is to take preventative measures to avoid becoming a host for the mites. Patients should take special care when traveling in infested areas by completely covering their skin, tucking pant cuffs into their socks, and applying products containing DEET (N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide or N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide) to the skin and clothing. The odds of prevention are increased even further when clothing also is treated with permethrin.¹¹

In parts of Asia and Australia, these mites may transmit Orientia tsutsugamushi, the organism responsible for scrub typhus, through their saliva during a bite.¹² Scrub typhus is associated with an eschar, as well as fever, intense headache, and diffuse myalgia. It responds well to treatment with doxycycline 100 mg twice daily.¹³ Studies investigating genetic material found in trombiculid mites across the globe have detected Ehrlichia-specific DNA in Spain,¹⁴Borrelia-specific DNA in the Czech Republic,^15,16 and Hantavirus-specific RNA in Texas.¹⁷ There is evidence that the mites play a role in maintenance of zoonotic reservoirs, while humans are infected via ingestion or inhalation of infectious rodent extreta.¹⁸

Identifying Characteristics and Disease Transmission

Chiggers belong to the Trombiculidae family of mites and also are referred to as harvest mites, harvest bugs, harvest lice, mower’s mites, and redbugs.¹ The term chigger specifically describes the larval stage of this mite’s life cycle, as it is the only stage responsible for chigger bites. The nymph and adult phases feed on vegetable matter. Trombiculid mites are most often found in forests, grassy areas, gardens, and moist areas of soil near bodies of water. Trombicula alfreddugesi is the most common species in the United States, and these mites mainly live in the southeastern and south central regions of the country. Conversely, Trombicula autumnalis is most predominant in Western Europe and East Asia.¹

The life cycle of the mite includes the egg, larval, nymphal, and adult stages.² Due to their need for air humidity greater than 80%, mites lay their eggs on low leaves, blades of grass, or on the ground. They spend most of their lives on vegetation no more than 30 cm above ground level.³ Eggs remain dormant for approximately 6 days until the hatching of the prelarvae, which have 6 legs and are nonfeeding. It takes another 6 days for the prelarvae to mature into larvae. Measuring 0.15 to 0.3 mm in length, mite larvae are a mere fraction of the size of adult mites, which generally are 1 to 2 mm in length, and are bright red or brown-red in color (Figure 1).

The biting larvae have many acceptable hosts including turtles, toads, birds, small mammals, and humans, which act as accidental hosts. Larvae remain on vegetation waiting for a suitable host to pass by so they may attach to its skin and remain there for several days. In the exploration for an ideal area to begin feeding (eg, thin epidermis,⁴ localized increased air humidity⁵), larvae can travel extensively on the skin; however, they often are stopped by tight-fitting sections of clothing (eg, waistbands), so bites are mostly found in clusters. To feed, mite larvae latch onto the skin using chelicerae, jawlike appendages found in the front of the mouth in arachnids.⁶ They then inject digestive enzymes that liquefy epidermal cells on direct contact, which results in the formation of a stylostome from which the mites may suck up lymph fluid and broken down tissue.⁷ Although the actual initial bite is painless, this feeding process leads to the localized inflammation and irritation noticed by infested patients.⁸

The classic clinical presentation includes severe pruritus and cutaneous swelling as well as erythema caused by the combination of several factors, such as enzyme-induced cellular mechanical damage, human immune response, and sometimes a superimposed bacterial infection. Papules and papulovesicles appear in groups, most commonly affecting the legs and waistline (Figure 2).⁹ Itching generally occurs within hours of larval latching and subsides within 72 hours. Cutaneous lesions typically take 1 to 2 weeks to heal. In some rare cases, patients may react with urticarial, bullous, or morbilliform eruptions, and the inflammation and pruritus can last for weeks.⁶ Summer penile syndrome has been noted in boys who display a local hypersensitivity to chigger bites.¹⁰ This syndrome represents a triad of penile swelling, dysuria, and pruritus, which lasts for a few days to a few weeks.

Disease Management

Because the lesions are self-healing, treatment is focused on symptomatic relief of itching by means of topical antipruritics (eg, camphor and menthol, pramoxine lotion) or oral antihistamines (eg, diphenhydramine, hydroxyzine). Potent topical corticosteroids may be used to alleviate inflammation and pruritus, especially when occluded under plastic wrap to increase absorption. In severe cases, an intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (2.5–5 mg/mL) injection may be required.⁹ The best practice, however, is to take preventative measures to avoid becoming a host for the mites. Patients should take special care when traveling in infested areas by completely covering their skin, tucking pant cuffs into their socks, and applying products containing DEET (N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide or N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide) to the skin and clothing. The odds of prevention are increased even further when clothing also is treated with permethrin.¹¹

In parts of Asia and Australia, these mites may transmit Orientia tsutsugamushi, the organism responsible for scrub typhus, through their saliva during a bite.¹² Scrub typhus is associated with an eschar, as well as fever, intense headache, and diffuse myalgia. It responds well to treatment with doxycycline 100 mg twice daily.¹³ Studies investigating genetic material found in trombiculid mites across the globe have detected Ehrlichia-specific DNA in Spain,¹⁴Borrelia-specific DNA in the Czech Republic,^15,16 and Hantavirus-specific RNA in Texas.¹⁷ There is evidence that the mites play a role in maintenance of zoonotic reservoirs, while humans are infected via ingestion or inhalation of infectious rodent extreta.¹⁸

Identifying Characteristics and Disease Transmission

Chiggers belong to the Trombiculidae family of mites and also are referred to as harvest mites, harvest bugs, harvest lice, mower’s mites, and redbugs.¹ The term chigger specifically describes the larval stage of this mite’s life cycle, as it is the only stage responsible for chigger bites. The nymph and adult phases feed on vegetable matter. Trombiculid mites are most often found in forests, grassy areas, gardens, and moist areas of soil near bodies of water. Trombicula alfreddugesi is the most common species in the United States, and these mites mainly live in the southeastern and south central regions of the country. Conversely, Trombicula autumnalis is most predominant in Western Europe and East Asia.¹

The life cycle of the mite includes the egg, larval, nymphal, and adult stages.² Due to their need for air humidity greater than 80%, mites lay their eggs on low leaves, blades of grass, or on the ground. They spend most of their lives on vegetation no more than 30 cm above ground level.³ Eggs remain dormant for approximately 6 days until the hatching of the prelarvae, which have 6 legs and are nonfeeding. It takes another 6 days for the prelarvae to mature into larvae. Measuring 0.15 to 0.3 mm in length, mite larvae are a mere fraction of the size of adult mites, which generally are 1 to 2 mm in length, and are bright red or brown-red in color (Figure 1).

The biting larvae have many acceptable hosts including turtles, toads, birds, small mammals, and humans, which act as accidental hosts. Larvae remain on vegetation waiting for a suitable host to pass by so they may attach to its skin and remain there for several days. In the exploration for an ideal area to begin feeding (eg, thin epidermis,⁴ localized increased air humidity⁵), larvae can travel extensively on the skin; however, they often are stopped by tight-fitting sections of clothing (eg, waistbands), so bites are mostly found in clusters. To feed, mite larvae latch onto the skin using chelicerae, jawlike appendages found in the front of the mouth in arachnids.⁶ They then inject digestive enzymes that liquefy epidermal cells on direct contact, which results in the formation of a stylostome from which the mites may suck up lymph fluid and broken down tissue.⁷ Although the actual initial bite is painless, this feeding process leads to the localized inflammation and irritation noticed by infested patients.⁸

The classic clinical presentation includes severe pruritus and cutaneous swelling as well as erythema caused by the combination of several factors, such as enzyme-induced cellular mechanical damage, human immune response, and sometimes a superimposed bacterial infection. Papules and papulovesicles appear in groups, most commonly affecting the legs and waistline (Figure 2).⁹ Itching generally occurs within hours of larval latching and subsides within 72 hours. Cutaneous lesions typically take 1 to 2 weeks to heal. In some rare cases, patients may react with urticarial, bullous, or morbilliform eruptions, and the inflammation and pruritus can last for weeks.⁶ Summer penile syndrome has been noted in boys who display a local hypersensitivity to chigger bites.¹⁰ This syndrome represents a triad of penile swelling, dysuria, and pruritus, which lasts for a few days to a few weeks.

Disease Management

Because the lesions are self-healing, treatment is focused on symptomatic relief of itching by means of topical antipruritics (eg, camphor and menthol, pramoxine lotion) or oral antihistamines (eg, diphenhydramine, hydroxyzine). Potent topical corticosteroids may be used to alleviate inflammation and pruritus, especially when occluded under plastic wrap to increase absorption. In severe cases, an intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (2.5–5 mg/mL) injection may be required.⁹ The best practice, however, is to take preventative measures to avoid becoming a host for the mites. Patients should take special care when traveling in infested areas by completely covering their skin, tucking pant cuffs into their socks, and applying products containing DEET (N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide or N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide) to the skin and clothing. The odds of prevention are increased even further when clothing also is treated with permethrin.¹¹

In parts of Asia and Australia, these mites may transmit Orientia tsutsugamushi, the organism responsible for scrub typhus, through their saliva during a bite.¹² Scrub typhus is associated with an eschar, as well as fever, intense headache, and diffuse myalgia. It responds well to treatment with doxycycline 100 mg twice daily.¹³ Studies investigating genetic material found in trombiculid mites across the globe have detected Ehrlichia-specific DNA in Spain,¹⁴Borrelia-specific DNA in the Czech Republic,^15,16 and Hantavirus-specific RNA in Texas.¹⁷ There is evidence that the mites play a role in maintenance of zoonotic reservoirs, while humans are infected via ingestion or inhalation of infectious rodent extreta.¹⁸

Identifying Characteristics and Disease Transmission

Cheyletiella are nonburrowing mites characterized by hooklike anterior palps (Figure 1) that have a worldwide distribution. Human dermatitis is the result of contact with an affected animal and may present as papular or bullous lesions. Cheyletiella blakei affects cats, Cheyletiella parasitovorax is found on rabbits, and Cheyletiella yasguri is found on dogs. The mites live in the outer layer of the epidermis of the host animal and feed on surface debris and tissue fluids.¹ They complete an entire 35-day life cycle on a single animal host. The larval, nymph, and adult male mites die within 48 hours of separation from a host. The female mite and possibly the eggs can live up to 10 days off the host, which makes environmental decontamination a critical part of pest control.² In animals, the mite often produces a subtle dermatitis sometimes called walking dandruff (Figure 2).³ Affected animals also can be asymptomatic, and up to 50% of rabbits in commercial colonies may harbor Cheyletiella or other mites.⁴

The typical human patient with Cheyletiella-associated dermatitis is a female 40 years or younger who presents with grouped pruritic papules.⁵ Although papules usually are grouped on exposed areas, they also may be widespread.^6,7 Bullous eruptions caused by Cheyletiella mites may mimic those found in immunobullous diseases (Figure 3).⁸ Children may experience widespread dermatitis after taking a nap where a dog has slept.⁹ Pet owners, farmers, and veterinarians frequently present with zoonotic mite-induced dermatitis.¹⁰ Arthralgia and peripheral eosinophilia caused by Cheyletiella infestation also has been reported.¹¹

Management of Affected Pets

In a case of human infestation resulting from an affected pet, the implicated pet should be evaluated by a qualified veterinarian. Various diagnostic techniques for animals have been used, including adhesive tape preparations.¹² A rapid knockdown insecticidal spray marketed for use on animals has been used to facilitate collection of mites, but some pets may be susceptible to toxicity from insecticides. The scaly area should be carefully brushed with a toothbrush or fine-tooth comb, and all scales, crust, and hair collected should be placed in a resealable plastic storage bag. When alcohol is added to the bag, most contents will sink, but the mites tend to float. Vacuum cleaners fitted with in-line filters also have been used to collect mites. The filter samples can be treated with hot potassium hydroxide, then floated in a concentrated sugar solution to collect the ectoparasites.¹³ Often, a straightforward approach using a #10 blade to provide a skin scraping from the animal in question is effective.¹⁴

Various treatment modalities may be employed by the veterinarian, including dips or shampoos, as well as fipronil.^15,16 A single application of fipronil 10% has been shown to be highly effective in the elimination of mites after a single application in cats.¹⁷ Oral ivermectin and topical amitraz also have been used.^18,19 A veterinarian should treat the animals, as some are more susceptible to toxicity from topical or systemic agents.

Treatment in Humans

Cheyletiella infestations in humans usually are self-limited and resolve within a few weeks after treatment of the source animal. Symptomatic treatment with antipruritic medications and topical steroids may be of use while awaiting resolution. Identification and treatment of the vector is key to eliminating the infestation and preventing recurrence.

Identifying Characteristics and Disease Transmission

Cheyletiella are nonburrowing mites characterized by hooklike anterior palps (Figure 1) that have a worldwide distribution. Human dermatitis is the result of contact with an affected animal and may present as papular or bullous lesions. Cheyletiella blakei affects cats, Cheyletiella parasitovorax is found on rabbits, and Cheyletiella yasguri is found on dogs. The mites live in the outer layer of the epidermis of the host animal and feed on surface debris and tissue fluids.¹ They complete an entire 35-day life cycle on a single animal host. The larval, nymph, and adult male mites die within 48 hours of separation from a host. The female mite and possibly the eggs can live up to 10 days off the host, which makes environmental decontamination a critical part of pest control.² In animals, the mite often produces a subtle dermatitis sometimes called walking dandruff (Figure 2).³ Affected animals also can be asymptomatic, and up to 50% of rabbits in commercial colonies may harbor Cheyletiella or other mites.⁴

The typical human patient with Cheyletiella-associated dermatitis is a female 40 years or younger who presents with grouped pruritic papules.⁵ Although papules usually are grouped on exposed areas, they also may be widespread.^6,7 Bullous eruptions caused by Cheyletiella mites may mimic those found in immunobullous diseases (Figure 3).⁸ Children may experience widespread dermatitis after taking a nap where a dog has slept.⁹ Pet owners, farmers, and veterinarians frequently present with zoonotic mite-induced dermatitis.¹⁰ Arthralgia and peripheral eosinophilia caused by Cheyletiella infestation also has been reported.¹¹

Management of Affected Pets

In a case of human infestation resulting from an affected pet, the implicated pet should be evaluated by a qualified veterinarian. Various diagnostic techniques for animals have been used, including adhesive tape preparations.¹² A rapid knockdown insecticidal spray marketed for use on animals has been used to facilitate collection of mites, but some pets may be susceptible to toxicity from insecticides. The scaly area should be carefully brushed with a toothbrush or fine-tooth comb, and all scales, crust, and hair collected should be placed in a resealable plastic storage bag. When alcohol is added to the bag, most contents will sink, but the mites tend to float. Vacuum cleaners fitted with in-line filters also have been used to collect mites. The filter samples can be treated with hot potassium hydroxide, then floated in a concentrated sugar solution to collect the ectoparasites.¹³ Often, a straightforward approach using a #10 blade to provide a skin scraping from the animal in question is effective.¹⁴

Various treatment modalities may be employed by the veterinarian, including dips or shampoos, as well as fipronil.^15,16 A single application of fipronil 10% has been shown to be highly effective in the elimination of mites after a single application in cats.¹⁷ Oral ivermectin and topical amitraz also have been used.^18,19 A veterinarian should treat the animals, as some are more susceptible to toxicity from topical or systemic agents.

Treatment in Humans

Cheyletiella infestations in humans usually are self-limited and resolve within a few weeks after treatment of the source animal. Symptomatic treatment with antipruritic medications and topical steroids may be of use while awaiting resolution. Identification and treatment of the vector is key to eliminating the infestation and preventing recurrence.

Identifying Characteristics and Disease Transmission

Cheyletiella are nonburrowing mites characterized by hooklike anterior palps (Figure 1) that have a worldwide distribution. Human dermatitis is the result of contact with an affected animal and may present as papular or bullous lesions. Cheyletiella blakei affects cats, Cheyletiella parasitovorax is found on rabbits, and Cheyletiella yasguri is found on dogs. The mites live in the outer layer of the epidermis of the host animal and feed on surface debris and tissue fluids.¹ They complete an entire 35-day life cycle on a single animal host. The larval, nymph, and adult male mites die within 48 hours of separation from a host. The female mite and possibly the eggs can live up to 10 days off the host, which makes environmental decontamination a critical part of pest control.² In animals, the mite often produces a subtle dermatitis sometimes called walking dandruff (Figure 2).³ Affected animals also can be asymptomatic, and up to 50% of rabbits in commercial colonies may harbor Cheyletiella or other mites.⁴

The typical human patient with Cheyletiella-associated dermatitis is a female 40 years or younger who presents with grouped pruritic papules.⁵ Although papules usually are grouped on exposed areas, they also may be widespread.^6,7 Bullous eruptions caused by Cheyletiella mites may mimic those found in immunobullous diseases (Figure 3).⁸ Children may experience widespread dermatitis after taking a nap where a dog has slept.⁹ Pet owners, farmers, and veterinarians frequently present with zoonotic mite-induced dermatitis.¹⁰ Arthralgia and peripheral eosinophilia caused by Cheyletiella infestation also has been reported.¹¹

Management of Affected Pets

In a case of human infestation resulting from an affected pet, the implicated pet should be evaluated by a qualified veterinarian. Various diagnostic techniques for animals have been used, including adhesive tape preparations.¹² A rapid knockdown insecticidal spray marketed for use on animals has been used to facilitate collection of mites, but some pets may be susceptible to toxicity from insecticides. The scaly area should be carefully brushed with a toothbrush or fine-tooth comb, and all scales, crust, and hair collected should be placed in a resealable plastic storage bag. When alcohol is added to the bag, most contents will sink, but the mites tend to float. Vacuum cleaners fitted with in-line filters also have been used to collect mites. The filter samples can be treated with hot potassium hydroxide, then floated in a concentrated sugar solution to collect the ectoparasites.¹³ Often, a straightforward approach using a #10 blade to provide a skin scraping from the animal in question is effective.¹⁴

Various treatment modalities may be employed by the veterinarian, including dips or shampoos, as well as fipronil.^15,16 A single application of fipronil 10% has been shown to be highly effective in the elimination of mites after a single application in cats.¹⁷ Oral ivermectin and topical amitraz also have been used.^18,19 A veterinarian should treat the animals, as some are more susceptible to toxicity from topical or systemic agents.

Treatment in Humans

Cheyletiella infestations in humans usually are self-limited and resolve within a few weeks after treatment of the source animal. Symptomatic treatment with antipruritic medications and topical steroids may be of use while awaiting resolution. Identification and treatment of the vector is key to eliminating the infestation and preventing recurrence.

The lone star tick (Amblyomma americanum) is distributed throughout much of the eastern United States. It serves as a vector for species of Rickettsia, Ehrlichia, and Borrelia that are an important cause of tick-borne illness (Table). In addition, the bite of the lone star tick can cause impressive local and systemic reactions. Delayed anaphylaxis to ingestion of red meat has been attributed to the bite of A americanum.¹ Herein, we discuss human disease associated with the lone star tick as well as potential tick-control measures.

Tick Characteristics

Lone star ticks are characterized by long anterior mouthparts and an ornate scutum (hard dorsal plate). Widely spaced eyes and posterior festoons also are present. In contrast to some other ticks, adanal plates are absent on the ventral surface in male lone star ticks. Amblyomma americanum demonstrates a single white spot on the female’s scutum (Figure 1). The male has inverted horseshoe markings on the posterior scutum. The female’s scutum often covers only a portion of the body to allow room for engorgement.

Patients usually become aware of tick bites while the tick is still attached to the skin, which provides the physician with an opportunity to identify the tick and discuss tick-control measures as well as symptoms of tick-borne disease. Once the tick has been removed, delayed-type hypersensitivity to the tick antigens continues at the attachment site. Erythema and pruritus can be dramatic. Nodules with a pseudolymphomatous histology can occur. Milder reactions respond to application of topical corticosteroids. More intense reactions may require intralesional corticosteroid injection or even surgical excision.

Most hard ticks have a 3-host life cycle, meaning they attach for one long blood meal during each phase of the life cycle. Because they search for a new host for each blood meal, they are efficient disease vectors. The larval ticks, so-called seed ticks, have 6 legs and feed on small animals. Nymphs and adults feed on larger animals. Nymphs resemble small adult ticks with 8 legs but are sexually immature.

Distribution

Amblyomma americanum has a wide distribution in the United States from Texas to Iowa and as far north as Maine (Figure 2).² Tick attachments often are seen in individuals who work outdoors, especially in areas where new commercial or residential development disrupts the environment and the tick’s usual hosts move out of the area. Hungry ticks are left behind in search of a host.

Disease Transmission

Lone star ticks have been implicated as vectors of Ehrlichia chaffeensis, the agent of human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME),³ which has been documented from the mid-Atlantic to south-central United States. It may present as a somewhat milder Rocky Mountain spotted fever–like illness with fever and headache or as a life-threatening systemic illness with organ failure. Prompt diagnosis and treatment with a tetracycline has been correlated with a better prognosis.⁴ Immunofluorescent antibody testing and polymerase chain reaction can be used to establish the diagnosis.⁵ Two tick species—A americanum and Dermacentor variabilis—have been implicated as vectors, but A americanum appears to be the major vector.^6,7

The lone star tick also is a vector for Erlichia ewingii, the cause of human ehrlichiosis ewingii. Human ehrlichiosis ewingii is a rare disease that presents similar to HME, with most reported cases occurring in immunocompromised hosts.⁸

A novel member of the Phlebovirus genus, the Heartland virus, was first described in 2 Missouri farmers who presented with symptoms similar to HME but did not respond to doxycycline treatment.⁹ The virus has since been isolated from A americanum adult ticks, implicating them as the major vectors of the disease.¹⁰

Rickettsia parkeri, a cause of spotted fever rickettsiosis, is responsible for an eschar-associated illness in affected individuals.¹¹ The organism has been detected in A americanum ticks collected from the wild. Experiments show the tick is capable of transmitting R parkeri to animals in the laboratory. It is unclear, however, what role A americanum plays in the natural transmission of the disease.¹²

In Missouri, strains of Borrelia have been isolated from A americanum ticks that feed on cottontail rabbits, but it seems unlikely that the tick plays any role in transmission of true Lyme disease^13,14; Borrelia has been shown to have poor survival in the saliva of A americanum beyond 24 hours.¹⁵ Southern tick–associated rash illness is a Lyme disease–like illness with several reported cases due to A americanum.¹⁶ Patients generally present with an erythema migrans–like rash and may have headache, fever, arthralgia, or myalgia.¹⁶ The causative organism remains unclear, though Borrelia lonestari has been implicated.¹⁷ Lone star ticks also transmit tularemia and may transmit Rocky Mountain spotted fever and Q fever.¹³

Bullis fever (first reported at Camp Bullis near San Antonio, Texas) affected huge numbers of military personnel from 1942 to 1943.¹⁸ The causative organism appears to be rickettsial. During one outbreak of Bullis fever, it was noted that A americanum was so numerous that more than 4000 adult ticks were collected under a single juniper tree and more than 1000 ticks were removed from a single soldier who sat in a thicket for 2 hours.¹² No cases of Bullis fever have been reported in recent years,¹² which probably relates to the introduction of fire ants.

Disease Hosts

At Little Rock Air Force Base in Arkansas, A americanum has been a source of Ehrlichia infection. During one outbreak, deer in the area were found to have as many as 2550 ticks per ear,¹⁹ which demonstrates the magnitude of tick infestation in some areas of the United States. Tick infestation is not merely of concern to the US military. Ticks are ubiquitous and can be found on neatly trimmed suburban lawns as well as in rough thickets.

More recently, bites from A americanum have been found to induce allergies to red meat in some patients.¹ IgE antibodies directed against galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha gal) have been implicated as the cause of this reaction. These antibodies cause delayed-onset anaphylaxis occurring 3 to 6 hours after ingestion of red meat. Tick bites appear to be the most important and perhaps the only cause of IgE antibodies to alpha gal in the United States.¹

Wild white-tailed deer serve as reservoir hosts for several diseases transmitted by A americanum, including HME, human ehrlichiosis ewingii, and Southern tick–associated rash illness.^12,20 Communities located close to wildlife reserves may have higher rates of infection.²¹ Application of acaricides to corn contained in deer feeders has been shown to be an effective method of decreasing local tick populations, which is a potential method for disease control in at-risk areas, though it is costly and time consuming.²²

Tick-Control Measures

Hard ticks produce little urine. Instead, excess water is eliminated via salivation back into the host. Loss of water also occurs through spiracles. Absorption of water from the atmosphere is important for the tick to maintain hydration. The tick produces intensely hygroscopic saliva that absorbs water from surrounding moist air. The humidified saliva is then reingested by the tick. In hot climates, ticks are prone to dehydration unless they can find a source of moist air, usually within a layer of leaf debris.²³ When the leaf debris is stirred by a human walking through the area, the tick can make contact with the human. Therefore, removal of leaf debris is a critical part of tick-control efforts, as it reduces tick numbers by means of dehydration. Tick eggs also require sufficient humidity to hatch. Leaf removal increases the effectiveness of insecticide applications, which would otherwise do little harm to the ticks below if sprayed on top of leaf debris.

Some lone star ticks attach to birds and disseminate widely. Attachments to animal hosts with long-range migration patterns complicate tick-control efforts.²⁴ Animal migration may contribute to the spread of disease from one geographic region to another.

Imported fire ants are voracious eaters that gather and consume ticks eggs. Fire ants provide an excellent natural means of tick control. Tick numbers in places such as Camp Bullis have declined dramatically since the introduction of imported fire ants.²⁵

The lone star tick (Amblyomma americanum) is distributed throughout much of the eastern United States. It serves as a vector for species of Rickettsia, Ehrlichia, and Borrelia that are an important cause of tick-borne illness (Table). In addition, the bite of the lone star tick can cause impressive local and systemic reactions. Delayed anaphylaxis to ingestion of red meat has been attributed to the bite of A americanum.¹ Herein, we discuss human disease associated with the lone star tick as well as potential tick-control measures.

Tick Characteristics

Lone star ticks are characterized by long anterior mouthparts and an ornate scutum (hard dorsal plate). Widely spaced eyes and posterior festoons also are present. In contrast to some other ticks, adanal plates are absent on the ventral surface in male lone star ticks. Amblyomma americanum demonstrates a single white spot on the female’s scutum (Figure 1). The male has inverted horseshoe markings on the posterior scutum. The female’s scutum often covers only a portion of the body to allow room for engorgement.

Patients usually become aware of tick bites while the tick is still attached to the skin, which provides the physician with an opportunity to identify the tick and discuss tick-control measures as well as symptoms of tick-borne disease. Once the tick has been removed, delayed-type hypersensitivity to the tick antigens continues at the attachment site. Erythema and pruritus can be dramatic. Nodules with a pseudolymphomatous histology can occur. Milder reactions respond to application of topical corticosteroids. More intense reactions may require intralesional corticosteroid injection or even surgical excision.

Most hard ticks have a 3-host life cycle, meaning they attach for one long blood meal during each phase of the life cycle. Because they search for a new host for each blood meal, they are efficient disease vectors. The larval ticks, so-called seed ticks, have 6 legs and feed on small animals. Nymphs and adults feed on larger animals. Nymphs resemble small adult ticks with 8 legs but are sexually immature.

Distribution

Amblyomma americanum has a wide distribution in the United States from Texas to Iowa and as far north as Maine (Figure 2).² Tick attachments often are seen in individuals who work outdoors, especially in areas where new commercial or residential development disrupts the environment and the tick’s usual hosts move out of the area. Hungry ticks are left behind in search of a host.

Disease Transmission

Lone star ticks have been implicated as vectors of Ehrlichia chaffeensis, the agent of human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME),³ which has been documented from the mid-Atlantic to south-central United States. It may present as a somewhat milder Rocky Mountain spotted fever–like illness with fever and headache or as a life-threatening systemic illness with organ failure. Prompt diagnosis and treatment with a tetracycline has been correlated with a better prognosis.⁴ Immunofluorescent antibody testing and polymerase chain reaction can be used to establish the diagnosis.⁵ Two tick species—A americanum and Dermacentor variabilis—have been implicated as vectors, but A americanum appears to be the major vector.^6,7

The lone star tick also is a vector for Erlichia ewingii, the cause of human ehrlichiosis ewingii. Human ehrlichiosis ewingii is a rare disease that presents similar to HME, with most reported cases occurring in immunocompromised hosts.⁸

A novel member of the Phlebovirus genus, the Heartland virus, was first described in 2 Missouri farmers who presented with symptoms similar to HME but did not respond to doxycycline treatment.⁹ The virus has since been isolated from A americanum adult ticks, implicating them as the major vectors of the disease.¹⁰

Rickettsia parkeri, a cause of spotted fever rickettsiosis, is responsible for an eschar-associated illness in affected individuals.¹¹ The organism has been detected in A americanum ticks collected from the wild. Experiments show the tick is capable of transmitting R parkeri to animals in the laboratory. It is unclear, however, what role A americanum plays in the natural transmission of the disease.¹²

In Missouri, strains of Borrelia have been isolated from A americanum ticks that feed on cottontail rabbits, but it seems unlikely that the tick plays any role in transmission of true Lyme disease^13,14; Borrelia has been shown to have poor survival in the saliva of A americanum beyond 24 hours.¹⁵ Southern tick–associated rash illness is a Lyme disease–like illness with several reported cases due to A americanum.¹⁶ Patients generally present with an erythema migrans–like rash and may have headache, fever, arthralgia, or myalgia.¹⁶ The causative organism remains unclear, though Borrelia lonestari has been implicated.¹⁷ Lone star ticks also transmit tularemia and may transmit Rocky Mountain spotted fever and Q fever.¹³

Bullis fever (first reported at Camp Bullis near San Antonio, Texas) affected huge numbers of military personnel from 1942 to 1943.¹⁸ The causative organism appears to be rickettsial. During one outbreak of Bullis fever, it was noted that A americanum was so numerous that more than 4000 adult ticks were collected under a single juniper tree and more than 1000 ticks were removed from a single soldier who sat in a thicket for 2 hours.¹² No cases of Bullis fever have been reported in recent years,¹² which probably relates to the introduction of fire ants.

Disease Hosts

At Little Rock Air Force Base in Arkansas, A americanum has been a source of Ehrlichia infection. During one outbreak, deer in the area were found to have as many as 2550 ticks per ear,¹⁹ which demonstrates the magnitude of tick infestation in some areas of the United States. Tick infestation is not merely of concern to the US military. Ticks are ubiquitous and can be found on neatly trimmed suburban lawns as well as in rough thickets.

More recently, bites from A americanum have been found to induce allergies to red meat in some patients.¹ IgE antibodies directed against galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha gal) have been implicated as the cause of this reaction. These antibodies cause delayed-onset anaphylaxis occurring 3 to 6 hours after ingestion of red meat. Tick bites appear to be the most important and perhaps the only cause of IgE antibodies to alpha gal in the United States.¹

Wild white-tailed deer serve as reservoir hosts for several diseases transmitted by A americanum, including HME, human ehrlichiosis ewingii, and Southern tick–associated rash illness.^12,20 Communities located close to wildlife reserves may have higher rates of infection.²¹ Application of acaricides to corn contained in deer feeders has been shown to be an effective method of decreasing local tick populations, which is a potential method for disease control in at-risk areas, though it is costly and time consuming.²²

Tick-Control Measures

Hard ticks produce little urine. Instead, excess water is eliminated via salivation back into the host. Loss of water also occurs through spiracles. Absorption of water from the atmosphere is important for the tick to maintain hydration. The tick produces intensely hygroscopic saliva that absorbs water from surrounding moist air. The humidified saliva is then reingested by the tick. In hot climates, ticks are prone to dehydration unless they can find a source of moist air, usually within a layer of leaf debris.²³ When the leaf debris is stirred by a human walking through the area, the tick can make contact with the human. Therefore, removal of leaf debris is a critical part of tick-control efforts, as it reduces tick numbers by means of dehydration. Tick eggs also require sufficient humidity to hatch. Leaf removal increases the effectiveness of insecticide applications, which would otherwise do little harm to the ticks below if sprayed on top of leaf debris.

Some lone star ticks attach to birds and disseminate widely. Attachments to animal hosts with long-range migration patterns complicate tick-control efforts.²⁴ Animal migration may contribute to the spread of disease from one geographic region to another.

Imported fire ants are voracious eaters that gather and consume ticks eggs. Fire ants provide an excellent natural means of tick control. Tick numbers in places such as Camp Bullis have declined dramatically since the introduction of imported fire ants.²⁵

The lone star tick (Amblyomma americanum) is distributed throughout much of the eastern United States. It serves as a vector for species of Rickettsia, Ehrlichia, and Borrelia that are an important cause of tick-borne illness (Table). In addition, the bite of the lone star tick can cause impressive local and systemic reactions. Delayed anaphylaxis to ingestion of red meat has been attributed to the bite of A americanum.¹ Herein, we discuss human disease associated with the lone star tick as well as potential tick-control measures.

Tick Characteristics

Lone star ticks are characterized by long anterior mouthparts and an ornate scutum (hard dorsal plate). Widely spaced eyes and posterior festoons also are present. In contrast to some other ticks, adanal plates are absent on the ventral surface in male lone star ticks. Amblyomma americanum demonstrates a single white spot on the female’s scutum (Figure 1). The male has inverted horseshoe markings on the posterior scutum. The female’s scutum often covers only a portion of the body to allow room for engorgement.

Patients usually become aware of tick bites while the tick is still attached to the skin, which provides the physician with an opportunity to identify the tick and discuss tick-control measures as well as symptoms of tick-borne disease. Once the tick has been removed, delayed-type hypersensitivity to the tick antigens continues at the attachment site. Erythema and pruritus can be dramatic. Nodules with a pseudolymphomatous histology can occur. Milder reactions respond to application of topical corticosteroids. More intense reactions may require intralesional corticosteroid injection or even surgical excision.

Most hard ticks have a 3-host life cycle, meaning they attach for one long blood meal during each phase of the life cycle. Because they search for a new host for each blood meal, they are efficient disease vectors. The larval ticks, so-called seed ticks, have 6 legs and feed on small animals. Nymphs and adults feed on larger animals. Nymphs resemble small adult ticks with 8 legs but are sexually immature.

Distribution

Amblyomma americanum has a wide distribution in the United States from Texas to Iowa and as far north as Maine (Figure 2).² Tick attachments often are seen in individuals who work outdoors, especially in areas where new commercial or residential development disrupts the environment and the tick’s usual hosts move out of the area. Hungry ticks are left behind in search of a host.

Disease Transmission

Lone star ticks have been implicated as vectors of Ehrlichia chaffeensis, the agent of human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME),³ which has been documented from the mid-Atlantic to south-central United States. It may present as a somewhat milder Rocky Mountain spotted fever–like illness with fever and headache or as a life-threatening systemic illness with organ failure. Prompt diagnosis and treatment with a tetracycline has been correlated with a better prognosis.⁴ Immunofluorescent antibody testing and polymerase chain reaction can be used to establish the diagnosis.⁵ Two tick species—A americanum and Dermacentor variabilis—have been implicated as vectors, but A americanum appears to be the major vector.^6,7

The lone star tick also is a vector for Erlichia ewingii, the cause of human ehrlichiosis ewingii. Human ehrlichiosis ewingii is a rare disease that presents similar to HME, with most reported cases occurring in immunocompromised hosts.⁸

A novel member of the Phlebovirus genus, the Heartland virus, was first described in 2 Missouri farmers who presented with symptoms similar to HME but did not respond to doxycycline treatment.⁹ The virus has since been isolated from A americanum adult ticks, implicating them as the major vectors of the disease.¹⁰

Rickettsia parkeri, a cause of spotted fever rickettsiosis, is responsible for an eschar-associated illness in affected individuals.¹¹ The organism has been detected in A americanum ticks collected from the wild. Experiments show the tick is capable of transmitting R parkeri to animals in the laboratory. It is unclear, however, what role A americanum plays in the natural transmission of the disease.¹²

In Missouri, strains of Borrelia have been isolated from A americanum ticks that feed on cottontail rabbits, but it seems unlikely that the tick plays any role in transmission of true Lyme disease^13,14; Borrelia has been shown to have poor survival in the saliva of A americanum beyond 24 hours.¹⁵ Southern tick–associated rash illness is a Lyme disease–like illness with several reported cases due to A americanum.¹⁶ Patients generally present with an erythema migrans–like rash and may have headache, fever, arthralgia, or myalgia.¹⁶ The causative organism remains unclear, though Borrelia lonestari has been implicated.¹⁷ Lone star ticks also transmit tularemia and may transmit Rocky Mountain spotted fever and Q fever.¹³

Bullis fever (first reported at Camp Bullis near San Antonio, Texas) affected huge numbers of military personnel from 1942 to 1943.¹⁸ The causative organism appears to be rickettsial. During one outbreak of Bullis fever, it was noted that A americanum was so numerous that more than 4000 adult ticks were collected under a single juniper tree and more than 1000 ticks were removed from a single soldier who sat in a thicket for 2 hours.¹² No cases of Bullis fever have been reported in recent years,¹² which probably relates to the introduction of fire ants.

Disease Hosts

At Little Rock Air Force Base in Arkansas, A americanum has been a source of Ehrlichia infection. During one outbreak, deer in the area were found to have as many as 2550 ticks per ear,¹⁹ which demonstrates the magnitude of tick infestation in some areas of the United States. Tick infestation is not merely of concern to the US military. Ticks are ubiquitous and can be found on neatly trimmed suburban lawns as well as in rough thickets.

More recently, bites from A americanum have been found to induce allergies to red meat in some patients.¹ IgE antibodies directed against galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha gal) have been implicated as the cause of this reaction. These antibodies cause delayed-onset anaphylaxis occurring 3 to 6 hours after ingestion of red meat. Tick bites appear to be the most important and perhaps the only cause of IgE antibodies to alpha gal in the United States.¹

Wild white-tailed deer serve as reservoir hosts for several diseases transmitted by A americanum, including HME, human ehrlichiosis ewingii, and Southern tick–associated rash illness.^12,20 Communities located close to wildlife reserves may have higher rates of infection.²¹ Application of acaricides to corn contained in deer feeders has been shown to be an effective method of decreasing local tick populations, which is a potential method for disease control in at-risk areas, though it is costly and time consuming.²²

Tick-Control Measures

Hard ticks produce little urine. Instead, excess water is eliminated via salivation back into the host. Loss of water also occurs through spiracles. Absorption of water from the atmosphere is important for the tick to maintain hydration. The tick produces intensely hygroscopic saliva that absorbs water from surrounding moist air. The humidified saliva is then reingested by the tick. In hot climates, ticks are prone to dehydration unless they can find a source of moist air, usually within a layer of leaf debris.²³ When the leaf debris is stirred by a human walking through the area, the tick can make contact with the human. Therefore, removal of leaf debris is a critical part of tick-control efforts, as it reduces tick numbers by means of dehydration. Tick eggs also require sufficient humidity to hatch. Leaf removal increases the effectiveness of insecticide applications, which would otherwise do little harm to the ticks below if sprayed on top of leaf debris.

Some lone star ticks attach to birds and disseminate widely. Attachments to animal hosts with long-range migration patterns complicate tick-control efforts.²⁴ Animal migration may contribute to the spread of disease from one geographic region to another.

Imported fire ants are voracious eaters that gather and consume ticks eggs. Fire ants provide an excellent natural means of tick control. Tick numbers in places such as Camp Bullis have declined dramatically since the introduction of imported fire ants.²⁵

Sea urchin injuries are commonly seen in coastal regions near both warm and cold salt water with frequent recreational water activities or fishing. Sea urchins belong to the class Echinoidea with approximately 600 species, of which roughly 80 are poisonous to humans.^1,2 When a human comes in contact with a sea urchin, the spines of the sea urchin (made of calcium carbonate) can penetrate the skin and break off from the sea urchin, becoming embedded in the skin. Injuries from sea urchin spines are most commonly seen on the hands and feet, as the likelihood of contact with a sea urchin is greater on these sites. The severity of sea urchin spine injuries can vary widely, from minimal local trauma and pain to arthritis, synovitis, and occasionally systemic illness.^1,3 It is important to recognize the wide variety of responses to sea urchin spine injuries and the impact of prompt treatment. Many published reports on injuries from sea urchin spines describe arthritis and synovitis from spines in the joints.^1,2,4-6 Fewer reports discuss nonjoint injuries and the dermatologic aspects of sea urchin spine injuries.^3,7,8 We pre-sent a case of a patient with a puncture injury from sea urchin spines that resulted in painful granulomas.

Case Report

A 29-year-old otherwise healthy man was referred to our dermatology clinic by the university student health center due to continued pain in the right thigh. Five weeks prior to presentation to the student health center, the patient had fallen on a sea urchin while snorkeling in Hawaii. Sea urchin spines became lodged in the right thigh, some of which were removed in a local medical clinic in Hawaii. He was given oral antibiotics prior to his return home. A plain film radiograph of the affected area ordered by the student health center showed several punctate and linear densities in the lateral aspect of the right mid thigh (Figure 1). These findings were consistent with sea urchin spines within the superficial soft tissues of the lateral thigh.

At the time of presentation to our dermatology clinic, the patient reported sharp intermittent pain localized to the right thigh. The patient denied any fever, chills, or pain in the joints. On physical examination, there were several firm nodules on the right thigh, ranging from 4 to 20 mm in diameter (Figure 2). The nodules were tender to palpation with some surrounding edema. Drainage was not noted. Several scars were visible at sites of the original puncture injuries and removal of the spines.

Two 6-mm punch biopsies were performed on representative nodules on the right thigh for histopathologic examination. Along with the biopsy tissue, firm, brown-black, linear foreign bodies consistent with sea urchin spines were extracted with forceps (Figure 3). Histopathologic examination revealed a dense, diffuse, mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate in the dermis predominantly composed of lymphocytes, histiocytes, and numerous eosinophils. Proliferation of small vessels was noted. In one of the biopsies, small fragments of necrotic tissue were present. These findings were consistent with granulomatous inflammation and granulation tissue due to a foreign body.

At the time of suture removal 2 weeks later, the biopsied areas were well healed with minimal erythema. The patient reported decreased pain in the involved areas. He was not seen in clinic again due to resolution of the nodules and associated pain.

Comment

Sea urchin spine injuries are commonly seen in coastal regions with frequent participation in recreational and occupational water activities. A wide variety of responses can be seen in sea urchin spine injuries. There generally are 2 types of cutaneous reaction patterns to sea urchin spines: a primary initial reaction and a secondary delayed/granulomatous reaction. When the spines initially penetrate the skin, the primary initial reaction consists of sharp localized pain that worsens with applied pressure. In addition to pain, bleeding, erythema, edema, and myalgia can occur.³ These symptoms typically subside a few hours after complete removal of the spines from the skin.⁶ If some spines remain in the skin, a secondary delayed/granulomatous reaction can occur, which can lead to the formation of granulomas that can manifest as nodules or papules and can be diffuse.

Many patients may think their painful encounter with a sea urchin was just an unfortunate event, but depending on the location of the injury, more serious extracutaneous reactions and chronic symptoms may occur. Some cases have described the development of arthritis and synovitis from the implantation of spines into joints.^1,2,4-6 Other extracutaneous complications include neuropathy and paresthesia, local bone destruction, radiating pain, muscular weakness, and hypotension.³

The severity of the injury also can depend on the sea urchin species and the number of spines implanted. There are approximately 80 poisonous sea urchin species possessing toxins in venomous spines, resulting in edema and change in the leukocyte-endothelial interaction.⁹ Substances identified in the spines include proteins, steroids, serotonin, histamine, and glycosides.^3,9 The number of spines implanted, particularly the number of venomous spines, can lead to more severe complications. Penetration of 15 or more venomous spines can commonly lead to extracutaneous symptoms.³ Another concern, irrespective of species type, is the potential for secondary infection associated with the spine penetration or implantation into the skin. Mycobacterium marinum infections have been reported in some sea urchin granulomas,¹⁰ as well as fungal infection, bacterial infection, and tetanus.³

The diagnosis of sea urchin spine injuries starts with a thorough history and physical examination. A positive history of sea urchin contact suggests the diagnosis, and radiographs can be useful to find the location of the spine(s), especially if there are no visible nodules on the skin. However, small fragments of spine may not be completely observed on plain radiographs. Any signs or symptoms of infection should prompt a culture for confirmation and guidance for management. Cutaneous biopsies can be helpful for both diagnosis confirmation and symptomatic relief. Reported cases have described granulomatous reactions in the vast majority of the histologic specimens, with necrosis an additional common finding.^7,8 Sea urchin granulomas can be of varying types, the majority being foreign-body and sarcoid types.^3,6,7

Treatment of sea urchin spine injuries primarily involves removal of the spines by a physician. Patients may soak the affected areas in warm water prior to the removal of the spines to aid in pain relief. Surgical removal with local anesthesia and cutaneous extraction is a common treatment method, and more extensive surgical removal of the spines is another option, especially in areas around the joints.² The use of liquid nitrogen or skin punch biopsy also have been described as possible methods to remove the spines.^11,12

Conclusion

Sea urchin spine injuries can result in a wide range of cutaneous and systemic complications. Prompt diagnosis and treatment to remove the sea urchin spines can lessen the associated pain and is important in the prevention of more serious complications.

Sea urchin injuries are commonly seen in coastal regions near both warm and cold salt water with frequent recreational water activities or fishing. Sea urchins belong to the class Echinoidea with approximately 600 species, of which roughly 80 are poisonous to humans.^1,2 When a human comes in contact with a sea urchin, the spines of the sea urchin (made of calcium carbonate) can penetrate the skin and break off from the sea urchin, becoming embedded in the skin. Injuries from sea urchin spines are most commonly seen on the hands and feet, as the likelihood of contact with a sea urchin is greater on these sites. The severity of sea urchin spine injuries can vary widely, from minimal local trauma and pain to arthritis, synovitis, and occasionally systemic illness.^1,3 It is important to recognize the wide variety of responses to sea urchin spine injuries and the impact of prompt treatment. Many published reports on injuries from sea urchin spines describe arthritis and synovitis from spines in the joints.^1,2,4-6 Fewer reports discuss nonjoint injuries and the dermatologic aspects of sea urchin spine injuries.^3,7,8 We pre-sent a case of a patient with a puncture injury from sea urchin spines that resulted in painful granulomas.

Case Report

A 29-year-old otherwise healthy man was referred to our dermatology clinic by the university student health center due to continued pain in the right thigh. Five weeks prior to presentation to the student health center, the patient had fallen on a sea urchin while snorkeling in Hawaii. Sea urchin spines became lodged in the right thigh, some of which were removed in a local medical clinic in Hawaii. He was given oral antibiotics prior to his return home. A plain film radiograph of the affected area ordered by the student health center showed several punctate and linear densities in the lateral aspect of the right mid thigh (Figure 1). These findings were consistent with sea urchin spines within the superficial soft tissues of the lateral thigh.

At the time of presentation to our dermatology clinic, the patient reported sharp intermittent pain localized to the right thigh. The patient denied any fever, chills, or pain in the joints. On physical examination, there were several firm nodules on the right thigh, ranging from 4 to 20 mm in diameter (Figure 2). The nodules were tender to palpation with some surrounding edema. Drainage was not noted. Several scars were visible at sites of the original puncture injuries and removal of the spines.

Two 6-mm punch biopsies were performed on representative nodules on the right thigh for histopathologic examination. Along with the biopsy tissue, firm, brown-black, linear foreign bodies consistent with sea urchin spines were extracted with forceps (Figure 3). Histopathologic examination revealed a dense, diffuse, mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate in the dermis predominantly composed of lymphocytes, histiocytes, and numerous eosinophils. Proliferation of small vessels was noted. In one of the biopsies, small fragments of necrotic tissue were present. These findings were consistent with granulomatous inflammation and granulation tissue due to a foreign body.

At the time of suture removal 2 weeks later, the biopsied areas were well healed with minimal erythema. The patient reported decreased pain in the involved areas. He was not seen in clinic again due to resolution of the nodules and associated pain.

Comment

Sea urchin spine injuries are commonly seen in coastal regions with frequent participation in recreational and occupational water activities. A wide variety of responses can be seen in sea urchin spine injuries. There generally are 2 types of cutaneous reaction patterns to sea urchin spines: a primary initial reaction and a secondary delayed/granulomatous reaction. When the spines initially penetrate the skin, the primary initial reaction consists of sharp localized pain that worsens with applied pressure. In addition to pain, bleeding, erythema, edema, and myalgia can occur.³ These symptoms typically subside a few hours after complete removal of the spines from the skin.⁶ If some spines remain in the skin, a secondary delayed/granulomatous reaction can occur, which can lead to the formation of granulomas that can manifest as nodules or papules and can be diffuse.

Many patients may think their painful encounter with a sea urchin was just an unfortunate event, but depending on the location of the injury, more serious extracutaneous reactions and chronic symptoms may occur. Some cases have described the development of arthritis and synovitis from the implantation of spines into joints.^1,2,4-6 Other extracutaneous complications include neuropathy and paresthesia, local bone destruction, radiating pain, muscular weakness, and hypotension.³

The severity of the injury also can depend on the sea urchin species and the number of spines implanted. There are approximately 80 poisonous sea urchin species possessing toxins in venomous spines, resulting in edema and change in the leukocyte-endothelial interaction.⁹ Substances identified in the spines include proteins, steroids, serotonin, histamine, and glycosides.^3,9 The number of spines implanted, particularly the number of venomous spines, can lead to more severe complications. Penetration of 15 or more venomous spines can commonly lead to extracutaneous symptoms.³ Another concern, irrespective of species type, is the potential for secondary infection associated with the spine penetration or implantation into the skin. Mycobacterium marinum infections have been reported in some sea urchin granulomas,¹⁰ as well as fungal infection, bacterial infection, and tetanus.³

The diagnosis of sea urchin spine injuries starts with a thorough history and physical examination. A positive history of sea urchin contact suggests the diagnosis, and radiographs can be useful to find the location of the spine(s), especially if there are no visible nodules on the skin. However, small fragments of spine may not be completely observed on plain radiographs. Any signs or symptoms of infection should prompt a culture for confirmation and guidance for management. Cutaneous biopsies can be helpful for both diagnosis confirmation and symptomatic relief. Reported cases have described granulomatous reactions in the vast majority of the histologic specimens, with necrosis an additional common finding.^7,8 Sea urchin granulomas can be of varying types, the majority being foreign-body and sarcoid types.^3,6,7

Treatment of sea urchin spine injuries primarily involves removal of the spines by a physician. Patients may soak the affected areas in warm water prior to the removal of the spines to aid in pain relief. Surgical removal with local anesthesia and cutaneous extraction is a common treatment method, and more extensive surgical removal of the spines is another option, especially in areas around the joints.² The use of liquid nitrogen or skin punch biopsy also have been described as possible methods to remove the spines.^11,12

Conclusion

Sea urchin spine injuries can result in a wide range of cutaneous and systemic complications. Prompt diagnosis and treatment to remove the sea urchin spines can lessen the associated pain and is important in the prevention of more serious complications.

Sea urchin injuries are commonly seen in coastal regions near both warm and cold salt water with frequent recreational water activities or fishing. Sea urchins belong to the class Echinoidea with approximately 600 species, of which roughly 80 are poisonous to humans.^1,2 When a human comes in contact with a sea urchin, the spines of the sea urchin (made of calcium carbonate) can penetrate the skin and break off from the sea urchin, becoming embedded in the skin. Injuries from sea urchin spines are most commonly seen on the hands and feet, as the likelihood of contact with a sea urchin is greater on these sites. The severity of sea urchin spine injuries can vary widely, from minimal local trauma and pain to arthritis, synovitis, and occasionally systemic illness.^1,3 It is important to recognize the wide variety of responses to sea urchin spine injuries and the impact of prompt treatment. Many published reports on injuries from sea urchin spines describe arthritis and synovitis from spines in the joints.^1,2,4-6 Fewer reports discuss nonjoint injuries and the dermatologic aspects of sea urchin spine injuries.^3,7,8 We pre-sent a case of a patient with a puncture injury from sea urchin spines that resulted in painful granulomas.

Case Report

A 29-year-old otherwise healthy man was referred to our dermatology clinic by the university student health center due to continued pain in the right thigh. Five weeks prior to presentation to the student health center, the patient had fallen on a sea urchin while snorkeling in Hawaii. Sea urchin spines became lodged in the right thigh, some of which were removed in a local medical clinic in Hawaii. He was given oral antibiotics prior to his return home. A plain film radiograph of the affected area ordered by the student health center showed several punctate and linear densities in the lateral aspect of the right mid thigh (Figure 1). These findings were consistent with sea urchin spines within the superficial soft tissues of the lateral thigh.

At the time of presentation to our dermatology clinic, the patient reported sharp intermittent pain localized to the right thigh. The patient denied any fever, chills, or pain in the joints. On physical examination, there were several firm nodules on the right thigh, ranging from 4 to 20 mm in diameter (Figure 2). The nodules were tender to palpation with some surrounding edema. Drainage was not noted. Several scars were visible at sites of the original puncture injuries and removal of the spines.

Two 6-mm punch biopsies were performed on representative nodules on the right thigh for histopathologic examination. Along with the biopsy tissue, firm, brown-black, linear foreign bodies consistent with sea urchin spines were extracted with forceps (Figure 3). Histopathologic examination revealed a dense, diffuse, mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate in the dermis predominantly composed of lymphocytes, histiocytes, and numerous eosinophils. Proliferation of small vessels was noted. In one of the biopsies, small fragments of necrotic tissue were present. These findings were consistent with granulomatous inflammation and granulation tissue due to a foreign body.

At the time of suture removal 2 weeks later, the biopsied areas were well healed with minimal erythema. The patient reported decreased pain in the involved areas. He was not seen in clinic again due to resolution of the nodules and associated pain.

Comment

Sea urchin spine injuries are commonly seen in coastal regions with frequent participation in recreational and occupational water activities. A wide variety of responses can be seen in sea urchin spine injuries. There generally are 2 types of cutaneous reaction patterns to sea urchin spines: a primary initial reaction and a secondary delayed/granulomatous reaction. When the spines initially penetrate the skin, the primary initial reaction consists of sharp localized pain that worsens with applied pressure. In addition to pain, bleeding, erythema, edema, and myalgia can occur.³ These symptoms typically subside a few hours after complete removal of the spines from the skin.⁶ If some spines remain in the skin, a secondary delayed/granulomatous reaction can occur, which can lead to the formation of granulomas that can manifest as nodules or papules and can be diffuse.

Many patients may think their painful encounter with a sea urchin was just an unfortunate event, but depending on the location of the injury, more serious extracutaneous reactions and chronic symptoms may occur. Some cases have described the development of arthritis and synovitis from the implantation of spines into joints.^1,2,4-6 Other extracutaneous complications include neuropathy and paresthesia, local bone destruction, radiating pain, muscular weakness, and hypotension.³

The severity of the injury also can depend on the sea urchin species and the number of spines implanted. There are approximately 80 poisonous sea urchin species possessing toxins in venomous spines, resulting in edema and change in the leukocyte-endothelial interaction.⁹ Substances identified in the spines include proteins, steroids, serotonin, histamine, and glycosides.^3,9 The number of spines implanted, particularly the number of venomous spines, can lead to more severe complications. Penetration of 15 or more venomous spines can commonly lead to extracutaneous symptoms.³ Another concern, irrespective of species type, is the potential for secondary infection associated with the spine penetration or implantation into the skin. Mycobacterium marinum infections have been reported in some sea urchin granulomas,¹⁰ as well as fungal infection, bacterial infection, and tetanus.³

The diagnosis of sea urchin spine injuries starts with a thorough history and physical examination. A positive history of sea urchin contact suggests the diagnosis, and radiographs can be useful to find the location of the spine(s), especially if there are no visible nodules on the skin. However, small fragments of spine may not be completely observed on plain radiographs. Any signs or symptoms of infection should prompt a culture for confirmation and guidance for management. Cutaneous biopsies can be helpful for both diagnosis confirmation and symptomatic relief. Reported cases have described granulomatous reactions in the vast majority of the histologic specimens, with necrosis an additional common finding.^7,8 Sea urchin granulomas can be of varying types, the majority being foreign-body and sarcoid types.^3,6,7

Treatment of sea urchin spine injuries primarily involves removal of the spines by a physician. Patients may soak the affected areas in warm water prior to the removal of the spines to aid in pain relief. Surgical removal with local anesthesia and cutaneous extraction is a common treatment method, and more extensive surgical removal of the spines is another option, especially in areas around the joints.² The use of liquid nitrogen or skin punch biopsy also have been described as possible methods to remove the spines.^11,12

Conclusion

Sea urchin spine injuries can result in a wide range of cutaneous and systemic complications. Prompt diagnosis and treatment to remove the sea urchin spines can lessen the associated pain and is important in the prevention of more serious complications.