Breast Cancer

A small percentage of patients with cancer show exceptional responses to treatment and survive significantly longer than patients with clinically comparable tumors, despite having advanced disease.

An ongoing research project is studying why some patients have exceptional responses. The researchers have found particular molecular features in the tumors of about a quarter of these patients. In some cases, there are multiple rare genetic changes in the tumor genome. In other cases, the tumors are infiltrated with certain types of immune cells.

The findings were published online November 19 in Cancer Cell. They come from a genomic analysis of tumor biopsy specimens from 111 patients who were identified by the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI’s) Exceptional Responders Initiative, a national project launched in 2014.

An exceptional responder is defined as an individual who achieves a partial or complete response to a treatment that would be effective in fewer than 10% of similar patients. For exceptional response, the duration of response is at least three times longer than the usual median response time.

In this study of 111 such patients, about one quarter (24%, n = 26 patients) were found to have tumors in which there were molecular features that could potentially explain exceptional responses to treatment.

“We won’t be able to identify, in every patient, which particular drugs will be beneficial,” said Louis Staudt, MD, PhD, director of the NCI’s Center for Cancer Genomics, who co-led the study. “We are nowhere near that. But what it does say is that we have identified particular mutations, some of which we knew about in some types of cancer but can also occur less commonly in other cancer types.”

Staudt noted that these mutations can “illuminate” the path that the cancer will take — and potentially can be used to predict whether the cancer will be aggressive and will require treatment or could be managed with surveillance. This is why this research can be useful in the short term, he said.

“In the longer term, this is the kind of research that inspires future work,” he told Medscape Medical News. “That would encompass clinical trials involving drugs that target some of the pathways we found to be genetically inactivated in some of these responders.”

These results support the use of genetic testing in routine clinical care, he said.

Earlier this year, the NCI team published the results of a pilot study that affirmed the feasibility of this approach. Of the more than 100 cases that were analyzed, six were identified as involving potentially clinically actionable germline mutations.
 

‘Curiosity drove the research’

“We had these wonderful and gratifying experiences with our patients, so we were immediately curious how that happened, so it was pretty much that curiosity that drove a lot of this work,” said Staudt.

In the current study, Staudt and colleagues used multiple genomic methodologies to detect mutations, copy number changes, aberrant methylation, outlier gene expression, and the cellular makeup of the tumor microenvironment.

The hypothesized mechanisms for exceptional responses were broadly divided into the following four categories: DNA damage response (n = 15), intracellular signaling pathway (n = 9), prognostic genetics (n = 9), and immunologic engagement (n = 16). For many patients, two or more of these mechanisms were involved.

The authors note that the “predominance of plausible DNA damage response mechanisms parallels the frequent use of cytotoxic chemotherapy in routine cancer treatment reflected in this cohort.”

Twenty-six patients were identified as exceptional responders. Among these patients, a variety of cancer types was represented: brain (8); gastrointestinal tract (6); breast (4); cholangiocarcinoma (2); lung (2); pancreas, endometrium, ovarian, and bladder (1 each). Many of these patients (65%, n = 17) were treated with chemotherapy that included DNA-damaging agents. For more than half (54%, n = 14), targeted therapies were used, and some patients received both.

The authors highlight several patients as examples of exceptional responders:

• One patient with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) was treated sequentially with surgery, localized carmustine, and radiotherapy. When the cancer recurred, temozolomide was administered. This induced a complete response that has lasted for more than a decade.
• A patient with metastatic colon adenocarcinoma has had an ongoing and nearly complete response that has lasted 45 months (last follow-up) after receiving temozolomide in combination with the investigational drug TRC102 (methoxyamine, under development by Tracon) in a phase 1 clinical trial. TRC102 is an inhibitor of the DNA base excision repair pathway, which is a pathway that causes resistance to alkylating and antimetabolite chemotherapeutics.
• A patient with metastatic, estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer received trastuzumab because of a high-level ERBB2 amplification, together with anastrozole. This resulted in an ongoing 2.4-year partial response.
• Although the patient was clinically HER2 positive, her tumor had exceedingly low expression of ERBB2 mRNA. Molecular profiling had classified the tumor as of the basal-like subtype rather than the HER2-enriched subtype. This meant that it was unlikely that trastuzumab contributed to the exceptional response, the authors note. Because the patient was estrogen-receptor positive, she received anastrozole, an inhibitor of aromatase (CYP19A), which converts testosterone into estradiol.
• A patient who had a gastrointestinal stromal tumor with a deletion of KIT exon 11 experienced relapse after an initial response to imatinib, which targets KIT and other tyrosine kinases, but then achieved a complete response with sunitinib. Gene expression profiling revealed high expression not only of KIT but also of genes encoding several tyrosine kinases that are targeted by sunitinib (KDR, FLT1, and FLT3). This may have accounted for the patient’s response.

Favorable genomic characteristics

The authors defined a “prognostic genetics” category of tumors, characterized by genetic lesions that are now known to be associated with a favorable prognosis but that were not addressed through routine care that these patients received when they were first diagnosed. Although the patients experienced relapse after first-line treatment, their exceptional survival after salvage therapy could be linked to favorable genomic characteristics.

For example, several of the patients with high-grade GBMs and astrocytomas had genetic lesions that are generally more common in low-grade glioma and that have been associated with an indolent clinical course following standard therapy.

The authors also assessed immune response. Examining immune cell infiltration in responder tumors in comparison with control cases, the team found that signatures of B cells and activated (CD56dim) natural killer cells were higher in exceptional-responder tumors.

In one patient with metastatic urothelial cancer who experienced disease progression after chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery, treatment with nivolumab produced a complete response that lasted 7 months. Such an outcome occurs in only about 3% of bladder cancer patients. The tumor expressed high mRNA levels of PDCD1, which encodes the nivolumab target PD-1, and CD274, which encodes the PD-1 ligand PD-L1. There was also a high level of amplification of IFNG, which encodes interferon-gamma, a cytokine that has been linked to favorable response to immune checkpoint blockade.
 

Moving to precision medicine

“It is very valuable to be tested up front and again when the disease progresses, because there may have been some genetic changes, and this may change the treatment,” said co–lead author S. Percy Ivy, MD, of the NCI’s Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis.

“The goal of this study was to understand what was unique about these patients and their genetic makeup that led them to be classified as exceptional responders, and hopefully we will be able to tease that out,” she added.

“As researchers, we have a lot to learn from these patients, and they have a lot to teach us,” she added. “In the future, they will help us as we move closer to the goal of delivering precision oncology to all of our patients. We’re not there yet, but every time we study more deeply and learn more, we are able to provide better care.”

To encourage participation in this effort by investigators around the world, the NCI team and their colleagues have made their molecular profiling results and clinical information publicly available in the NCI Genomic Data Commons.

The study was supported by the NCI’s Intramural Research Program, the National Institutes of Health, the Center for Cancer Research, and the NCI’s Center for Cancer Genomics. Staudt and Ivy have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

This article first appeared on Medscape.com.

A small percentage of patients with cancer show exceptional responses to treatment and survive significantly longer than patients with clinically comparable tumors, despite having advanced disease.

An ongoing research project is studying why some patients have exceptional responses. The researchers have found particular molecular features in the tumors of about a quarter of these patients. In some cases, there are multiple rare genetic changes in the tumor genome. In other cases, the tumors are infiltrated with certain types of immune cells.

The findings were published online November 19 in Cancer Cell. They come from a genomic analysis of tumor biopsy specimens from 111 patients who were identified by the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI’s) Exceptional Responders Initiative, a national project launched in 2014.

An exceptional responder is defined as an individual who achieves a partial or complete response to a treatment that would be effective in fewer than 10% of similar patients. For exceptional response, the duration of response is at least three times longer than the usual median response time.

In this study of 111 such patients, about one quarter (24%, n = 26 patients) were found to have tumors in which there were molecular features that could potentially explain exceptional responses to treatment.

“We won’t be able to identify, in every patient, which particular drugs will be beneficial,” said Louis Staudt, MD, PhD, director of the NCI’s Center for Cancer Genomics, who co-led the study. “We are nowhere near that. But what it does say is that we have identified particular mutations, some of which we knew about in some types of cancer but can also occur less commonly in other cancer types.”

Staudt noted that these mutations can “illuminate” the path that the cancer will take — and potentially can be used to predict whether the cancer will be aggressive and will require treatment or could be managed with surveillance. This is why this research can be useful in the short term, he said.

“In the longer term, this is the kind of research that inspires future work,” he told Medscape Medical News. “That would encompass clinical trials involving drugs that target some of the pathways we found to be genetically inactivated in some of these responders.”

These results support the use of genetic testing in routine clinical care, he said.

Earlier this year, the NCI team published the results of a pilot study that affirmed the feasibility of this approach. Of the more than 100 cases that were analyzed, six were identified as involving potentially clinically actionable germline mutations.
 

‘Curiosity drove the research’

“We had these wonderful and gratifying experiences with our patients, so we were immediately curious how that happened, so it was pretty much that curiosity that drove a lot of this work,” said Staudt.

In the current study, Staudt and colleagues used multiple genomic methodologies to detect mutations, copy number changes, aberrant methylation, outlier gene expression, and the cellular makeup of the tumor microenvironment.

The hypothesized mechanisms for exceptional responses were broadly divided into the following four categories: DNA damage response (n = 15), intracellular signaling pathway (n = 9), prognostic genetics (n = 9), and immunologic engagement (n = 16). For many patients, two or more of these mechanisms were involved.

The authors note that the “predominance of plausible DNA damage response mechanisms parallels the frequent use of cytotoxic chemotherapy in routine cancer treatment reflected in this cohort.”

Twenty-six patients were identified as exceptional responders. Among these patients, a variety of cancer types was represented: brain (8); gastrointestinal tract (6); breast (4); cholangiocarcinoma (2); lung (2); pancreas, endometrium, ovarian, and bladder (1 each). Many of these patients (65%, n = 17) were treated with chemotherapy that included DNA-damaging agents. For more than half (54%, n = 14), targeted therapies were used, and some patients received both.

The authors highlight several patients as examples of exceptional responders:

• One patient with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) was treated sequentially with surgery, localized carmustine, and radiotherapy. When the cancer recurred, temozolomide was administered. This induced a complete response that has lasted for more than a decade.
• A patient with metastatic colon adenocarcinoma has had an ongoing and nearly complete response that has lasted 45 months (last follow-up) after receiving temozolomide in combination with the investigational drug TRC102 (methoxyamine, under development by Tracon) in a phase 1 clinical trial. TRC102 is an inhibitor of the DNA base excision repair pathway, which is a pathway that causes resistance to alkylating and antimetabolite chemotherapeutics.
• A patient with metastatic, estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer received trastuzumab because of a high-level ERBB2 amplification, together with anastrozole. This resulted in an ongoing 2.4-year partial response.
• Although the patient was clinically HER2 positive, her tumor had exceedingly low expression of ERBB2 mRNA. Molecular profiling had classified the tumor as of the basal-like subtype rather than the HER2-enriched subtype. This meant that it was unlikely that trastuzumab contributed to the exceptional response, the authors note. Because the patient was estrogen-receptor positive, she received anastrozole, an inhibitor of aromatase (CYP19A), which converts testosterone into estradiol.
• A patient who had a gastrointestinal stromal tumor with a deletion of KIT exon 11 experienced relapse after an initial response to imatinib, which targets KIT and other tyrosine kinases, but then achieved a complete response with sunitinib. Gene expression profiling revealed high expression not only of KIT but also of genes encoding several tyrosine kinases that are targeted by sunitinib (KDR, FLT1, and FLT3). This may have accounted for the patient’s response.

Favorable genomic characteristics

The authors defined a “prognostic genetics” category of tumors, characterized by genetic lesions that are now known to be associated with a favorable prognosis but that were not addressed through routine care that these patients received when they were first diagnosed. Although the patients experienced relapse after first-line treatment, their exceptional survival after salvage therapy could be linked to favorable genomic characteristics.

For example, several of the patients with high-grade GBMs and astrocytomas had genetic lesions that are generally more common in low-grade glioma and that have been associated with an indolent clinical course following standard therapy.

The authors also assessed immune response. Examining immune cell infiltration in responder tumors in comparison with control cases, the team found that signatures of B cells and activated (CD56dim) natural killer cells were higher in exceptional-responder tumors.

In one patient with metastatic urothelial cancer who experienced disease progression after chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery, treatment with nivolumab produced a complete response that lasted 7 months. Such an outcome occurs in only about 3% of bladder cancer patients. The tumor expressed high mRNA levels of PDCD1, which encodes the nivolumab target PD-1, and CD274, which encodes the PD-1 ligand PD-L1. There was also a high level of amplification of IFNG, which encodes interferon-gamma, a cytokine that has been linked to favorable response to immune checkpoint blockade.
 

Moving to precision medicine

“It is very valuable to be tested up front and again when the disease progresses, because there may have been some genetic changes, and this may change the treatment,” said co–lead author S. Percy Ivy, MD, of the NCI’s Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis.

“The goal of this study was to understand what was unique about these patients and their genetic makeup that led them to be classified as exceptional responders, and hopefully we will be able to tease that out,” she added.

“As researchers, we have a lot to learn from these patients, and they have a lot to teach us,” she added. “In the future, they will help us as we move closer to the goal of delivering precision oncology to all of our patients. We’re not there yet, but every time we study more deeply and learn more, we are able to provide better care.”

To encourage participation in this effort by investigators around the world, the NCI team and their colleagues have made their molecular profiling results and clinical information publicly available in the NCI Genomic Data Commons.

The study was supported by the NCI’s Intramural Research Program, the National Institutes of Health, the Center for Cancer Research, and the NCI’s Center for Cancer Genomics. Staudt and Ivy have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

This article first appeared on Medscape.com.

A small percentage of patients with cancer show exceptional responses to treatment and survive significantly longer than patients with clinically comparable tumors, despite having advanced disease.

An ongoing research project is studying why some patients have exceptional responses. The researchers have found particular molecular features in the tumors of about a quarter of these patients. In some cases, there are multiple rare genetic changes in the tumor genome. In other cases, the tumors are infiltrated with certain types of immune cells.

The findings were published online November 19 in Cancer Cell. They come from a genomic analysis of tumor biopsy specimens from 111 patients who were identified by the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI’s) Exceptional Responders Initiative, a national project launched in 2014.

An exceptional responder is defined as an individual who achieves a partial or complete response to a treatment that would be effective in fewer than 10% of similar patients. For exceptional response, the duration of response is at least three times longer than the usual median response time.

In this study of 111 such patients, about one quarter (24%, n = 26 patients) were found to have tumors in which there were molecular features that could potentially explain exceptional responses to treatment.

“We won’t be able to identify, in every patient, which particular drugs will be beneficial,” said Louis Staudt, MD, PhD, director of the NCI’s Center for Cancer Genomics, who co-led the study. “We are nowhere near that. But what it does say is that we have identified particular mutations, some of which we knew about in some types of cancer but can also occur less commonly in other cancer types.”

Staudt noted that these mutations can “illuminate” the path that the cancer will take — and potentially can be used to predict whether the cancer will be aggressive and will require treatment or could be managed with surveillance. This is why this research can be useful in the short term, he said.

“In the longer term, this is the kind of research that inspires future work,” he told Medscape Medical News. “That would encompass clinical trials involving drugs that target some of the pathways we found to be genetically inactivated in some of these responders.”

These results support the use of genetic testing in routine clinical care, he said.

Earlier this year, the NCI team published the results of a pilot study that affirmed the feasibility of this approach. Of the more than 100 cases that were analyzed, six were identified as involving potentially clinically actionable germline mutations.
 

‘Curiosity drove the research’

“We had these wonderful and gratifying experiences with our patients, so we were immediately curious how that happened, so it was pretty much that curiosity that drove a lot of this work,” said Staudt.

In the current study, Staudt and colleagues used multiple genomic methodologies to detect mutations, copy number changes, aberrant methylation, outlier gene expression, and the cellular makeup of the tumor microenvironment.

The hypothesized mechanisms for exceptional responses were broadly divided into the following four categories: DNA damage response (n = 15), intracellular signaling pathway (n = 9), prognostic genetics (n = 9), and immunologic engagement (n = 16). For many patients, two or more of these mechanisms were involved.

The authors note that the “predominance of plausible DNA damage response mechanisms parallels the frequent use of cytotoxic chemotherapy in routine cancer treatment reflected in this cohort.”

Twenty-six patients were identified as exceptional responders. Among these patients, a variety of cancer types was represented: brain (8); gastrointestinal tract (6); breast (4); cholangiocarcinoma (2); lung (2); pancreas, endometrium, ovarian, and bladder (1 each). Many of these patients (65%, n = 17) were treated with chemotherapy that included DNA-damaging agents. For more than half (54%, n = 14), targeted therapies were used, and some patients received both.

The authors highlight several patients as examples of exceptional responders:

• One patient with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) was treated sequentially with surgery, localized carmustine, and radiotherapy. When the cancer recurred, temozolomide was administered. This induced a complete response that has lasted for more than a decade.
• A patient with metastatic colon adenocarcinoma has had an ongoing and nearly complete response that has lasted 45 months (last follow-up) after receiving temozolomide in combination with the investigational drug TRC102 (methoxyamine, under development by Tracon) in a phase 1 clinical trial. TRC102 is an inhibitor of the DNA base excision repair pathway, which is a pathway that causes resistance to alkylating and antimetabolite chemotherapeutics.
• A patient with metastatic, estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer received trastuzumab because of a high-level ERBB2 amplification, together with anastrozole. This resulted in an ongoing 2.4-year partial response.
• Although the patient was clinically HER2 positive, her tumor had exceedingly low expression of ERBB2 mRNA. Molecular profiling had classified the tumor as of the basal-like subtype rather than the HER2-enriched subtype. This meant that it was unlikely that trastuzumab contributed to the exceptional response, the authors note. Because the patient was estrogen-receptor positive, she received anastrozole, an inhibitor of aromatase (CYP19A), which converts testosterone into estradiol.
• A patient who had a gastrointestinal stromal tumor with a deletion of KIT exon 11 experienced relapse after an initial response to imatinib, which targets KIT and other tyrosine kinases, but then achieved a complete response with sunitinib. Gene expression profiling revealed high expression not only of KIT but also of genes encoding several tyrosine kinases that are targeted by sunitinib (KDR, FLT1, and FLT3). This may have accounted for the patient’s response.

Favorable genomic characteristics

The authors defined a “prognostic genetics” category of tumors, characterized by genetic lesions that are now known to be associated with a favorable prognosis but that were not addressed through routine care that these patients received when they were first diagnosed. Although the patients experienced relapse after first-line treatment, their exceptional survival after salvage therapy could be linked to favorable genomic characteristics.

For example, several of the patients with high-grade GBMs and astrocytomas had genetic lesions that are generally more common in low-grade glioma and that have been associated with an indolent clinical course following standard therapy.

The authors also assessed immune response. Examining immune cell infiltration in responder tumors in comparison with control cases, the team found that signatures of B cells and activated (CD56dim) natural killer cells were higher in exceptional-responder tumors.

In one patient with metastatic urothelial cancer who experienced disease progression after chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery, treatment with nivolumab produced a complete response that lasted 7 months. Such an outcome occurs in only about 3% of bladder cancer patients. The tumor expressed high mRNA levels of PDCD1, which encodes the nivolumab target PD-1, and CD274, which encodes the PD-1 ligand PD-L1. There was also a high level of amplification of IFNG, which encodes interferon-gamma, a cytokine that has been linked to favorable response to immune checkpoint blockade.
 

Moving to precision medicine

“It is very valuable to be tested up front and again when the disease progresses, because there may have been some genetic changes, and this may change the treatment,” said co–lead author S. Percy Ivy, MD, of the NCI’s Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis.

“The goal of this study was to understand what was unique about these patients and their genetic makeup that led them to be classified as exceptional responders, and hopefully we will be able to tease that out,” she added.

“As researchers, we have a lot to learn from these patients, and they have a lot to teach us,” she added. “In the future, they will help us as we move closer to the goal of delivering precision oncology to all of our patients. We’re not there yet, but every time we study more deeply and learn more, we are able to provide better care.”

To encourage participation in this effort by investigators around the world, the NCI team and their colleagues have made their molecular profiling results and clinical information publicly available in the NCI Genomic Data Commons.

The study was supported by the NCI’s Intramural Research Program, the National Institutes of Health, the Center for Cancer Research, and the NCI’s Center for Cancer Genomics. Staudt and Ivy have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

This article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Immunotherapy with pembrolizumab holds promise for improving the generally dismal outlook in patients with leptomeningeal metastases, a phase 2 trial suggests.

Results from the trial were reported at the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer’s 35th Anniversary Annual Meeting.

“Unfortunately, when patients present with leptomeningeal disease, they usually have a poor prognosis. Their median survival is measured at 6-24 weeks,” commented lead study author Jarushka Naidoo, MBBCh, an adjunct assistant professor of oncology at the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and a consultant medical oncologist at Beaumont Hospital in Dublin.

“While there may be some standard approaches for how we treat leptomeningeal disease, there are no universal standard therapies that are efficacious across solid tumor types,” Dr. Naidoo added.

With this in mind, Dr. Naidoo and colleagues tested systemic pembrolizumab in a trial of patients with leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors.

The trial closed early because of poor accrual, after enrolling 13 patients: 5 with breast carcinoma, 3 with high-grade glioma, 3 with non–small cell lung cancer, 1 with squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, and 1 with head and neck squamous carcinoma. Nine patients (69%) had received at least two prior lines of systemic therapy.
 

Response, safety, and biomarkers

Overall, five patients (38%) had a central nervous system response, as ascertained from radiologic response on MRI, cytologic response in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and/or clinical response in neurologic symptoms, Dr. Naidoo reported.

Two patients had a complete CNS response: a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, who was still alive at 3 years, and a patient with non–small cell lung cancer, who survived 9 months but succumbed to metastases elsewhere.

For the entire cohort, median CNS progression-free survival was 2.9 months, and median overall survival was 4.9 months.

“This is consistent with published prospective studies of systemic agents for leptomeningeal disease,” Dr. Naidoo pointed out. “Notably, even though numbers are small, we do see the tail-on-the-curve phenomenon in both of these survival curves, which is consistent with immune checkpoint blockade prospective studies.”

The rate of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 15.4%, and there were no grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events.

The number of patients was too small for formal correlational testing, but both patients who achieved a complete response developed immune-related adverse events.

The trial’s biomarker analyses showed that an aneuploidy assay using CSF tumor-derived DNA performed well at detecting leptomeningeal metastases, with sensitivity of 84.6%, compared with just 53.8% for CSF cytopathology (the current preferred method).

A multiplex assay of CSF cytokines identified similar baseline profiles for patients who went on to have responses and showed similar changes in profile (notably a reduction in proinflammatory cytokines) for the two patients who had complete responses.

Given the trial’s 38% CNS response rate, pembrolizumab “needs to be studied in larger populations of patients to confirm this result, but it could be used as a potential treatment option for patients with leptomeningeal disease from solid tumors,” Dr. Naidoo concluded. “Reassuringly, pembrolizumab was well tolerated, and this is extremely important in a patient population that is traditionally quite frail and in which other standard therapies that are used, such as high-dose methotrexate or intrathecal chemotherapy, are associated with far higher rates of toxicity.”
 

An unmet need

“Leptomeningeal metastasis is a strong unmet need, although its occurrence is fortunately quite rare,” commented Kim Margolin, MD, a clinical professor and medical oncologist at City of Hope National Medical Center in Duarte, Calif., who was not involved in this study.

Courtesy of City of Hope

The trial is noteworthy for showing activity of programmed death–1 (PD-1) blockade given only systemically and not with additional intrathecal therapy (as has been done in a concurrent study at MD Anderson Cancer Center) and for providing insight into various biomarkers, Dr. Margolin said in an interview.

“I cannot take a stand on author conclusions other than to agree it warrants further evaluation in carefully selected patients, and it would be great to compare something like peripheral PD-1 blockade alone versus in combination with intrathecal therapy versus a combination such as CTLA4 blockade plus PD-1 blockade such as our group and others have shown to have increased activity in CNS metastases over PD-1 block alone,” Dr. Margolin said.

“The drugs in this class are already approved, so there is no reason not to try them,” she noted.

However, patients with leptomeningeal metastases of melanoma, for example, are likely to have already received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.

“So the settings in which off-the-shelf PD-1 blockade would be useful are extremely limited,” she concluded.

The current trial was funded by Merck, the National Institutes of Health, the Lung Cancer Foundation of America, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Johns Hopkins University Seed Grants. Dr. Naidoo disclosed relationships with AstraZeneca, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Roche/Genentech. Dr. Margolin disclosed no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Naidoo J et al. SITC 2020, Abstract 788.

Immunotherapy with pembrolizumab holds promise for improving the generally dismal outlook in patients with leptomeningeal metastases, a phase 2 trial suggests.

Results from the trial were reported at the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer’s 35th Anniversary Annual Meeting.

“Unfortunately, when patients present with leptomeningeal disease, they usually have a poor prognosis. Their median survival is measured at 6-24 weeks,” commented lead study author Jarushka Naidoo, MBBCh, an adjunct assistant professor of oncology at the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and a consultant medical oncologist at Beaumont Hospital in Dublin.

“While there may be some standard approaches for how we treat leptomeningeal disease, there are no universal standard therapies that are efficacious across solid tumor types,” Dr. Naidoo added.

With this in mind, Dr. Naidoo and colleagues tested systemic pembrolizumab in a trial of patients with leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors.

The trial closed early because of poor accrual, after enrolling 13 patients: 5 with breast carcinoma, 3 with high-grade glioma, 3 with non–small cell lung cancer, 1 with squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, and 1 with head and neck squamous carcinoma. Nine patients (69%) had received at least two prior lines of systemic therapy.
 

Response, safety, and biomarkers

Overall, five patients (38%) had a central nervous system response, as ascertained from radiologic response on MRI, cytologic response in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and/or clinical response in neurologic symptoms, Dr. Naidoo reported.

Two patients had a complete CNS response: a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, who was still alive at 3 years, and a patient with non–small cell lung cancer, who survived 9 months but succumbed to metastases elsewhere.

For the entire cohort, median CNS progression-free survival was 2.9 months, and median overall survival was 4.9 months.

“This is consistent with published prospective studies of systemic agents for leptomeningeal disease,” Dr. Naidoo pointed out. “Notably, even though numbers are small, we do see the tail-on-the-curve phenomenon in both of these survival curves, which is consistent with immune checkpoint blockade prospective studies.”

The rate of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 15.4%, and there were no grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events.

The number of patients was too small for formal correlational testing, but both patients who achieved a complete response developed immune-related adverse events.

The trial’s biomarker analyses showed that an aneuploidy assay using CSF tumor-derived DNA performed well at detecting leptomeningeal metastases, with sensitivity of 84.6%, compared with just 53.8% for CSF cytopathology (the current preferred method).

A multiplex assay of CSF cytokines identified similar baseline profiles for patients who went on to have responses and showed similar changes in profile (notably a reduction in proinflammatory cytokines) for the two patients who had complete responses.

Given the trial’s 38% CNS response rate, pembrolizumab “needs to be studied in larger populations of patients to confirm this result, but it could be used as a potential treatment option for patients with leptomeningeal disease from solid tumors,” Dr. Naidoo concluded. “Reassuringly, pembrolizumab was well tolerated, and this is extremely important in a patient population that is traditionally quite frail and in which other standard therapies that are used, such as high-dose methotrexate or intrathecal chemotherapy, are associated with far higher rates of toxicity.”
 

An unmet need

“Leptomeningeal metastasis is a strong unmet need, although its occurrence is fortunately quite rare,” commented Kim Margolin, MD, a clinical professor and medical oncologist at City of Hope National Medical Center in Duarte, Calif., who was not involved in this study.

Courtesy of City of Hope

The trial is noteworthy for showing activity of programmed death–1 (PD-1) blockade given only systemically and not with additional intrathecal therapy (as has been done in a concurrent study at MD Anderson Cancer Center) and for providing insight into various biomarkers, Dr. Margolin said in an interview.

“I cannot take a stand on author conclusions other than to agree it warrants further evaluation in carefully selected patients, and it would be great to compare something like peripheral PD-1 blockade alone versus in combination with intrathecal therapy versus a combination such as CTLA4 blockade plus PD-1 blockade such as our group and others have shown to have increased activity in CNS metastases over PD-1 block alone,” Dr. Margolin said.

“The drugs in this class are already approved, so there is no reason not to try them,” she noted.

However, patients with leptomeningeal metastases of melanoma, for example, are likely to have already received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.

“So the settings in which off-the-shelf PD-1 blockade would be useful are extremely limited,” she concluded.

The current trial was funded by Merck, the National Institutes of Health, the Lung Cancer Foundation of America, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Johns Hopkins University Seed Grants. Dr. Naidoo disclosed relationships with AstraZeneca, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Roche/Genentech. Dr. Margolin disclosed no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Naidoo J et al. SITC 2020, Abstract 788.

Immunotherapy with pembrolizumab holds promise for improving the generally dismal outlook in patients with leptomeningeal metastases, a phase 2 trial suggests.

Results from the trial were reported at the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer’s 35th Anniversary Annual Meeting.

“Unfortunately, when patients present with leptomeningeal disease, they usually have a poor prognosis. Their median survival is measured at 6-24 weeks,” commented lead study author Jarushka Naidoo, MBBCh, an adjunct assistant professor of oncology at the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and a consultant medical oncologist at Beaumont Hospital in Dublin.

“While there may be some standard approaches for how we treat leptomeningeal disease, there are no universal standard therapies that are efficacious across solid tumor types,” Dr. Naidoo added.

With this in mind, Dr. Naidoo and colleagues tested systemic pembrolizumab in a trial of patients with leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors.

The trial closed early because of poor accrual, after enrolling 13 patients: 5 with breast carcinoma, 3 with high-grade glioma, 3 with non–small cell lung cancer, 1 with squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, and 1 with head and neck squamous carcinoma. Nine patients (69%) had received at least two prior lines of systemic therapy.
 

Response, safety, and biomarkers

Overall, five patients (38%) had a central nervous system response, as ascertained from radiologic response on MRI, cytologic response in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and/or clinical response in neurologic symptoms, Dr. Naidoo reported.

Two patients had a complete CNS response: a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, who was still alive at 3 years, and a patient with non–small cell lung cancer, who survived 9 months but succumbed to metastases elsewhere.

For the entire cohort, median CNS progression-free survival was 2.9 months, and median overall survival was 4.9 months.

“This is consistent with published prospective studies of systemic agents for leptomeningeal disease,” Dr. Naidoo pointed out. “Notably, even though numbers are small, we do see the tail-on-the-curve phenomenon in both of these survival curves, which is consistent with immune checkpoint blockade prospective studies.”

The rate of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 15.4%, and there were no grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events.

The number of patients was too small for formal correlational testing, but both patients who achieved a complete response developed immune-related adverse events.

The trial’s biomarker analyses showed that an aneuploidy assay using CSF tumor-derived DNA performed well at detecting leptomeningeal metastases, with sensitivity of 84.6%, compared with just 53.8% for CSF cytopathology (the current preferred method).

A multiplex assay of CSF cytokines identified similar baseline profiles for patients who went on to have responses and showed similar changes in profile (notably a reduction in proinflammatory cytokines) for the two patients who had complete responses.

Given the trial’s 38% CNS response rate, pembrolizumab “needs to be studied in larger populations of patients to confirm this result, but it could be used as a potential treatment option for patients with leptomeningeal disease from solid tumors,” Dr. Naidoo concluded. “Reassuringly, pembrolizumab was well tolerated, and this is extremely important in a patient population that is traditionally quite frail and in which other standard therapies that are used, such as high-dose methotrexate or intrathecal chemotherapy, are associated with far higher rates of toxicity.”
 

An unmet need

“Leptomeningeal metastasis is a strong unmet need, although its occurrence is fortunately quite rare,” commented Kim Margolin, MD, a clinical professor and medical oncologist at City of Hope National Medical Center in Duarte, Calif., who was not involved in this study.

Courtesy of City of Hope

The trial is noteworthy for showing activity of programmed death–1 (PD-1) blockade given only systemically and not with additional intrathecal therapy (as has been done in a concurrent study at MD Anderson Cancer Center) and for providing insight into various biomarkers, Dr. Margolin said in an interview.

“I cannot take a stand on author conclusions other than to agree it warrants further evaluation in carefully selected patients, and it would be great to compare something like peripheral PD-1 blockade alone versus in combination with intrathecal therapy versus a combination such as CTLA4 blockade plus PD-1 blockade such as our group and others have shown to have increased activity in CNS metastases over PD-1 block alone,” Dr. Margolin said.

“The drugs in this class are already approved, so there is no reason not to try them,” she noted.

However, patients with leptomeningeal metastases of melanoma, for example, are likely to have already received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.

“So the settings in which off-the-shelf PD-1 blockade would be useful are extremely limited,” she concluded.

The current trial was funded by Merck, the National Institutes of Health, the Lung Cancer Foundation of America, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Johns Hopkins University Seed Grants. Dr. Naidoo disclosed relationships with AstraZeneca, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Roche/Genentech. Dr. Margolin disclosed no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Naidoo J et al. SITC 2020, Abstract 788.

The utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasing, and is considered standard of care for the majority of patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer subtypes. A significant benefit of neoadjuvant systemic therapy is assessment of the tumor biology via chemotherapy response, which has prognostic implications and additionally can help tailor therapy in the adjuvant setting. In the era of precision medicine, de-escalation strategies are considered to provide patients with efficacious treatment and spare toxicity. Tasoulis et al assessed the accuracy of image-guided biopsy after neoadjuvant therapy to predict residual disease, and found a false negative rate (FNR) of 3.2% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.4% when the residual imaging abnormality was 2cm or smaller with a minimum of 6 vacuum-assisted biopsies performed. They also demonstrated a FNR of 4.2% and NPV of 97.2% in the subgroup of patients with ERBB2-positive and triple-negative subtypes, those most likely to achieve a pathologic complete response. These findings suggest that local therapy de-escalation may be a relevant strategy for those patients who have excellent responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) have historically been, and still are, considered important prognostic and predictive factors. Beyond these, the role of genomic assays in breast cancer is evolving, and the 21-gene recurrence score is a valuable prognostic tool to assess chemotherapy benefit in women with early-stage ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Precision medicine in oncology strives to identify and apply an individualized approach to cancer care based on strong scientific data. Zhang and colleagues demonstrated the prognostic ability of an 8 DNA repair-related gene signature that was constructed from gene expression profiles from over 1,000 women diagnosed with breast cancer. These genes have roles in ER-mediated transactivation, DNA damage repair and cell adhesion processes. Additionally, Kudela et al showed that microRNAs (mRNAs), which are small RNAs that regulate gene expression, are able to classify intrinsic breast cancer subtype, play a role in endocrine resistance, and may also enhance the function of predictive models such as the 21-gene recurrence score (Kudela). Ongoing research in the field of tumor genomics will help advance the field of personalized treatment for breast cancer.

Erin Roesch, MD
The Cleveland Clinic

References:

Killelea BK, Yang VQ, Wang SY, Hayse B, Mougalian S, Horowitz NR, Chagpar AB, Pusztai L, Lannin DR. Racial differences in the use and outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: results from the National Cancer Data Base. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4267-76.

Heil J, Schaefgen B, Sinn P, Harcos A, Gomez C, Stieber A, Hennings A, Schuetz F, Sohn C, Schneeweiss A, Golatta M. Diagnosis of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer by minimal invasive biopsy techniques. Br J Cancer. 2015;113:1565-70.

Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, Geyer CE Jr, Dees EC, Goetz MP, Olson JA Jr, Lively T, Badve SS, Saphner TJ, Wagner LI, Whelan TJ, Ellis MJ, Paik S, Wood WC, Ravdin PM, Keane MM, Gomez Moreno HL, Reddy PS, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Berenberg JL, Abrams J, Sledge GW Jr. Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:111-21.

Emmadi R, Canestrari E, Arbieva ZH, Mu W, Dai Y, Frasor J, Wiley E. Correlative analysis of miRNA expression and Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score in estrogen receptor positive breast carcinomas. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145346.

The utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasing, and is considered standard of care for the majority of patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer subtypes. A significant benefit of neoadjuvant systemic therapy is assessment of the tumor biology via chemotherapy response, which has prognostic implications and additionally can help tailor therapy in the adjuvant setting. In the era of precision medicine, de-escalation strategies are considered to provide patients with efficacious treatment and spare toxicity. Tasoulis et al assessed the accuracy of image-guided biopsy after neoadjuvant therapy to predict residual disease, and found a false negative rate (FNR) of 3.2% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.4% when the residual imaging abnormality was 2cm or smaller with a minimum of 6 vacuum-assisted biopsies performed. They also demonstrated a FNR of 4.2% and NPV of 97.2% in the subgroup of patients with ERBB2-positive and triple-negative subtypes, those most likely to achieve a pathologic complete response. These findings suggest that local therapy de-escalation may be a relevant strategy for those patients who have excellent responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) have historically been, and still are, considered important prognostic and predictive factors. Beyond these, the role of genomic assays in breast cancer is evolving, and the 21-gene recurrence score is a valuable prognostic tool to assess chemotherapy benefit in women with early-stage ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Precision medicine in oncology strives to identify and apply an individualized approach to cancer care based on strong scientific data. Zhang and colleagues demonstrated the prognostic ability of an 8 DNA repair-related gene signature that was constructed from gene expression profiles from over 1,000 women diagnosed with breast cancer. These genes have roles in ER-mediated transactivation, DNA damage repair and cell adhesion processes. Additionally, Kudela et al showed that microRNAs (mRNAs), which are small RNAs that regulate gene expression, are able to classify intrinsic breast cancer subtype, play a role in endocrine resistance, and may also enhance the function of predictive models such as the 21-gene recurrence score (Kudela). Ongoing research in the field of tumor genomics will help advance the field of personalized treatment for breast cancer.

Erin Roesch, MD
The Cleveland Clinic

References:

Killelea BK, Yang VQ, Wang SY, Hayse B, Mougalian S, Horowitz NR, Chagpar AB, Pusztai L, Lannin DR. Racial differences in the use and outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: results from the National Cancer Data Base. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4267-76.

Heil J, Schaefgen B, Sinn P, Harcos A, Gomez C, Stieber A, Hennings A, Schuetz F, Sohn C, Schneeweiss A, Golatta M. Diagnosis of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer by minimal invasive biopsy techniques. Br J Cancer. 2015;113:1565-70.

Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, Geyer CE Jr, Dees EC, Goetz MP, Olson JA Jr, Lively T, Badve SS, Saphner TJ, Wagner LI, Whelan TJ, Ellis MJ, Paik S, Wood WC, Ravdin PM, Keane MM, Gomez Moreno HL, Reddy PS, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Berenberg JL, Abrams J, Sledge GW Jr. Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:111-21.

Emmadi R, Canestrari E, Arbieva ZH, Mu W, Dai Y, Frasor J, Wiley E. Correlative analysis of miRNA expression and Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score in estrogen receptor positive breast carcinomas. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145346.

The utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasing, and is considered standard of care for the majority of patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer subtypes. A significant benefit of neoadjuvant systemic therapy is assessment of the tumor biology via chemotherapy response, which has prognostic implications and additionally can help tailor therapy in the adjuvant setting. In the era of precision medicine, de-escalation strategies are considered to provide patients with efficacious treatment and spare toxicity. Tasoulis et al assessed the accuracy of image-guided biopsy after neoadjuvant therapy to predict residual disease, and found a false negative rate (FNR) of 3.2% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.4% when the residual imaging abnormality was 2cm or smaller with a minimum of 6 vacuum-assisted biopsies performed. They also demonstrated a FNR of 4.2% and NPV of 97.2% in the subgroup of patients with ERBB2-positive and triple-negative subtypes, those most likely to achieve a pathologic complete response. These findings suggest that local therapy de-escalation may be a relevant strategy for those patients who have excellent responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) have historically been, and still are, considered important prognostic and predictive factors. Beyond these, the role of genomic assays in breast cancer is evolving, and the 21-gene recurrence score is a valuable prognostic tool to assess chemotherapy benefit in women with early-stage ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Precision medicine in oncology strives to identify and apply an individualized approach to cancer care based on strong scientific data. Zhang and colleagues demonstrated the prognostic ability of an 8 DNA repair-related gene signature that was constructed from gene expression profiles from over 1,000 women diagnosed with breast cancer. These genes have roles in ER-mediated transactivation, DNA damage repair and cell adhesion processes. Additionally, Kudela et al showed that microRNAs (mRNAs), which are small RNAs that regulate gene expression, are able to classify intrinsic breast cancer subtype, play a role in endocrine resistance, and may also enhance the function of predictive models such as the 21-gene recurrence score (Kudela). Ongoing research in the field of tumor genomics will help advance the field of personalized treatment for breast cancer.

Erin Roesch, MD
The Cleveland Clinic

References:

Killelea BK, Yang VQ, Wang SY, Hayse B, Mougalian S, Horowitz NR, Chagpar AB, Pusztai L, Lannin DR. Racial differences in the use and outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: results from the National Cancer Data Base. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4267-76.

Heil J, Schaefgen B, Sinn P, Harcos A, Gomez C, Stieber A, Hennings A, Schuetz F, Sohn C, Schneeweiss A, Golatta M. Diagnosis of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer by minimal invasive biopsy techniques. Br J Cancer. 2015;113:1565-70.

Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, Geyer CE Jr, Dees EC, Goetz MP, Olson JA Jr, Lively T, Badve SS, Saphner TJ, Wagner LI, Whelan TJ, Ellis MJ, Paik S, Wood WC, Ravdin PM, Keane MM, Gomez Moreno HL, Reddy PS, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Berenberg JL, Abrams J, Sledge GW Jr. Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:111-21.

Emmadi R, Canestrari E, Arbieva ZH, Mu W, Dai Y, Frasor J, Wiley E. Correlative analysis of miRNA expression and Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score in estrogen receptor positive breast carcinomas. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145346.

Key clinical point: Differences in microRNAs (mRNAs), a group of small RNAs that regulate gene expression, can be used to distinguish among breast cancer subtypes.

Major finding: Altered expression of microRNAs distinguished between cancer and healthy samples, and also identified breast cancer subtypes including HER2, Luminal A, Luminal B, and triple negative breast cancer, according to a retrospective study of 740 breast cancer cases included in the review.

Study details: The data come from a review of the latest research on the prognostic and predictive value of microRNAs in patients with luminal A breast cancer.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic, the Slovak Research and Development Agency, and the Operational Programme Research and Innovation funded by the ERDF.

Citation: Kudela E et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 17. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207691.

Key clinical point: Differences in microRNAs (mRNAs), a group of small RNAs that regulate gene expression, can be used to distinguish among breast cancer subtypes.

Major finding: Altered expression of microRNAs distinguished between cancer and healthy samples, and also identified breast cancer subtypes including HER2, Luminal A, Luminal B, and triple negative breast cancer, according to a retrospective study of 740 breast cancer cases included in the review.

Study details: The data come from a review of the latest research on the prognostic and predictive value of microRNAs in patients with luminal A breast cancer.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic, the Slovak Research and Development Agency, and the Operational Programme Research and Innovation funded by the ERDF.

Citation: Kudela E et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 17. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207691.

Key clinical point: Differences in microRNAs (mRNAs), a group of small RNAs that regulate gene expression, can be used to distinguish among breast cancer subtypes.

Major finding: Altered expression of microRNAs distinguished between cancer and healthy samples, and also identified breast cancer subtypes including HER2, Luminal A, Luminal B, and triple negative breast cancer, according to a retrospective study of 740 breast cancer cases included in the review.

Study details: The data come from a review of the latest research on the prognostic and predictive value of microRNAs in patients with luminal A breast cancer.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic, the Slovak Research and Development Agency, and the Operational Programme Research and Innovation funded by the ERDF.

Citation: Kudela E et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 17. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207691.

Key clinical point: Over a 12-month period, 15.4% of women with early breast cancer reported losing income. Although stress, anxiety, and depression were not association with household income changes (risk ratios 2.42, 1.12, and 1.41, respectively), the proportion of women reporting high stress was greatest among those who lost income (13.2%, compared to 3.1% among women maintaining an income of $100,000 or higher).

Major finding: Women with a household income below $50,000 had a higher risk of losing household income compared to those with incomes of $50,000 or higher, suggesting that lower income women may be more vulnerable to income loss after diagnosis with breast cancer.

Study details: The data come from a prospective, longitudinal cohort study including 467 women with early breast cancer enrolled in the Young and Strong cohort trial from 2012 to 2013.

Disclosures: The study was supported by an ASCO Improving Cancer Care grant, the National Institutes of Health, an NIH training grants. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Cook EE et al. BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 6. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09562-z.

Key clinical point: Over a 12-month period, 15.4% of women with early breast cancer reported losing income. Although stress, anxiety, and depression were not association with household income changes (risk ratios 2.42, 1.12, and 1.41, respectively), the proportion of women reporting high stress was greatest among those who lost income (13.2%, compared to 3.1% among women maintaining an income of $100,000 or higher).

Major finding: Women with a household income below $50,000 had a higher risk of losing household income compared to those with incomes of $50,000 or higher, suggesting that lower income women may be more vulnerable to income loss after diagnosis with breast cancer.

Study details: The data come from a prospective, longitudinal cohort study including 467 women with early breast cancer enrolled in the Young and Strong cohort trial from 2012 to 2013.

Disclosures: The study was supported by an ASCO Improving Cancer Care grant, the National Institutes of Health, an NIH training grants. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Cook EE et al. BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 6. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09562-z.

Key clinical point: Over a 12-month period, 15.4% of women with early breast cancer reported losing income. Although stress, anxiety, and depression were not association with household income changes (risk ratios 2.42, 1.12, and 1.41, respectively), the proportion of women reporting high stress was greatest among those who lost income (13.2%, compared to 3.1% among women maintaining an income of $100,000 or higher).

Major finding: Women with a household income below $50,000 had a higher risk of losing household income compared to those with incomes of $50,000 or higher, suggesting that lower income women may be more vulnerable to income loss after diagnosis with breast cancer.

Study details: The data come from a prospective, longitudinal cohort study including 467 women with early breast cancer enrolled in the Young and Strong cohort trial from 2012 to 2013.

Disclosures: The study was supported by an ASCO Improving Cancer Care grant, the National Institutes of Health, an NIH training grants. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Cook EE et al. BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 6. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09562-z.

Key clinical point: An exercise and diet intervention had no significant impact on fatigue in women with breast cancer who were undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Major finding: Based on the general cancer-related fatigue score using the MFI-20 questionnaire, general fatigue levels were not significantly different between groups of breast cancer patients randomized to an Adapted Physical Activity Diet (APAD) program and controls (P = 0.274).

Study details: The data come from a randomized, controlled trial of 360 adult women with early breast cancer designed to evaluate the impact of an exercise and nutrition intervention on fatigue during 6 months of chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the INCa-DGOS and by a Montpellier Cancer SIRIC grant. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. 

Citation: Jacot W et al. Nutrients. 2020 Oct 9. doi: 10.3390/nu12103081.

Key clinical point: An exercise and diet intervention had no significant impact on fatigue in women with breast cancer who were undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Major finding: Based on the general cancer-related fatigue score using the MFI-20 questionnaire, general fatigue levels were not significantly different between groups of breast cancer patients randomized to an Adapted Physical Activity Diet (APAD) program and controls (P = 0.274).

Study details: The data come from a randomized, controlled trial of 360 adult women with early breast cancer designed to evaluate the impact of an exercise and nutrition intervention on fatigue during 6 months of chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the INCa-DGOS and by a Montpellier Cancer SIRIC grant. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. 

Citation: Jacot W et al. Nutrients. 2020 Oct 9. doi: 10.3390/nu12103081.

Key clinical point: An exercise and diet intervention had no significant impact on fatigue in women with breast cancer who were undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Major finding: Based on the general cancer-related fatigue score using the MFI-20 questionnaire, general fatigue levels were not significantly different between groups of breast cancer patients randomized to an Adapted Physical Activity Diet (APAD) program and controls (P = 0.274).

Study details: The data come from a randomized, controlled trial of 360 adult women with early breast cancer designed to evaluate the impact of an exercise and nutrition intervention on fatigue during 6 months of chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the INCa-DGOS and by a Montpellier Cancer SIRIC grant. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. 

Citation: Jacot W et al. Nutrients. 2020 Oct 9. doi: 10.3390/nu12103081.

Key clinical point: A prognostic signature including 8 DNA repair-related genes (MDC1, RPA3, MED17, DDB2, SFPQ, XRCC4, CYP19A1, and PARP3) predicted overall survival in breast cancer patients

Major finding: The areas under the curve were for 3-year survival and 5-year survival were 0.717 and 0.772, respectively, in the GSE9893 data set, and 0.691 and 0.718, respectively, in the GSE42568 data set.

Study details: The data come from 1,096 women with breast cancer; gene expression profiles and clinical data were collected from a Chinese health database between October 9, 2019, and February 3, 2020.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Zhang D et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 5. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14622.

Key clinical point: A prognostic signature including 8 DNA repair-related genes (MDC1, RPA3, MED17, DDB2, SFPQ, XRCC4, CYP19A1, and PARP3) predicted overall survival in breast cancer patients

Major finding: The areas under the curve were for 3-year survival and 5-year survival were 0.717 and 0.772, respectively, in the GSE9893 data set, and 0.691 and 0.718, respectively, in the GSE42568 data set.

Study details: The data come from 1,096 women with breast cancer; gene expression profiles and clinical data were collected from a Chinese health database between October 9, 2019, and February 3, 2020.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Zhang D et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 5. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14622.

Key clinical point: A prognostic signature including 8 DNA repair-related genes (MDC1, RPA3, MED17, DDB2, SFPQ, XRCC4, CYP19A1, and PARP3) predicted overall survival in breast cancer patients

Major finding: The areas under the curve were for 3-year survival and 5-year survival were 0.717 and 0.772, respectively, in the GSE9893 data set, and 0.691 and 0.718, respectively, in the GSE42568 data set.

Study details: The data come from 1,096 women with breast cancer; gene expression profiles and clinical data were collected from a Chinese health database between October 9, 2019, and February 3, 2020.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Zhang D et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 5. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14622.

Key clinical point: The use of textured implants in reconstructive surgery after breast cancer mastectomy was significantly associated with lower rates of disease-free survival compared to smooth implants, but no difference was noted in local and regional recurrence-free survival based on implant texture.

Major finding: Rates of disease-free survival were significantly lower among breast cancer patients who received textured breast implants compared to those who received smooth implants (hazard ratio 3.054); the association was even stronger among patients with stage II or III tumors (HR 8.874).

Study details: The data come from a cohort study of 650 women representing 687 cases of breast cancer who were treated at a single center in South Korea between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Lee K-T et al. JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4124.

Key clinical point: The use of textured implants in reconstructive surgery after breast cancer mastectomy was significantly associated with lower rates of disease-free survival compared to smooth implants, but no difference was noted in local and regional recurrence-free survival based on implant texture.

Major finding: Rates of disease-free survival were significantly lower among breast cancer patients who received textured breast implants compared to those who received smooth implants (hazard ratio 3.054); the association was even stronger among patients with stage II or III tumors (HR 8.874).

Study details: The data come from a cohort study of 650 women representing 687 cases of breast cancer who were treated at a single center in South Korea between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Lee K-T et al. JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4124.

Key clinical point: The use of textured implants in reconstructive surgery after breast cancer mastectomy was significantly associated with lower rates of disease-free survival compared to smooth implants, but no difference was noted in local and regional recurrence-free survival based on implant texture.

Major finding: Rates of disease-free survival were significantly lower among breast cancer patients who received textured breast implants compared to those who received smooth implants (hazard ratio 3.054); the association was even stronger among patients with stage II or III tumors (HR 8.874).

Study details: The data come from a cohort study of 650 women representing 687 cases of breast cancer who were treated at a single center in South Korea between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Lee K-T et al. JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4124.

Key clinical point: Vacuum-assisted biopsy accurately predicted residual disease in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Major finding: The overall false negative rate using vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) was 18.7%; in a subgroup of patients with a complete/partial response and imaging abnormalities of 2 cm or smaller, the false negative rate was 3.2% and the negative predictive value was 97.4% for an overall accuracy of 89.5% with VAB.

Study details: The data come from a diagnostic study of 166 women with breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by image-guided biopsy.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.  

Citation: Tasoulis MK et al. JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4103.

Key clinical point: Vacuum-assisted biopsy accurately predicted residual disease in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Major finding: The overall false negative rate using vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) was 18.7%; in a subgroup of patients with a complete/partial response and imaging abnormalities of 2 cm or smaller, the false negative rate was 3.2% and the negative predictive value was 97.4% for an overall accuracy of 89.5% with VAB.

Study details: The data come from a diagnostic study of 166 women with breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by image-guided biopsy.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.  

Citation: Tasoulis MK et al. JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4103.

Key clinical point: Vacuum-assisted biopsy accurately predicted residual disease in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Major finding: The overall false negative rate using vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) was 18.7%; in a subgroup of patients with a complete/partial response and imaging abnormalities of 2 cm or smaller, the false negative rate was 3.2% and the negative predictive value was 97.4% for an overall accuracy of 89.5% with VAB.

Study details: The data come from a diagnostic study of 166 women with breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by image-guided biopsy.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.  

Citation: Tasoulis MK et al. JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4103.

Key clinical point: Outcomes including recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival were similar for breast cancer patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) or skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 

Major finding: Breast cancer patients who underwent IBR with NSM/SSM as surgical treatment showed similar rates of overall survival at 5 years compared to those who underwent conventional mastectomy (92.0% vs. 89.3%).

Study details: The data come from a retrospective, case-control study of 1,266 breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by immediate breast reconstruction or conventional mastectomy at a single center between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2016.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Wu Z-Y et al. JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 14. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4132.

Key clinical point: Outcomes including recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival were similar for breast cancer patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) or skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 

Major finding: Breast cancer patients who underwent IBR with NSM/SSM as surgical treatment showed similar rates of overall survival at 5 years compared to those who underwent conventional mastectomy (92.0% vs. 89.3%).

Study details: The data come from a retrospective, case-control study of 1,266 breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by immediate breast reconstruction or conventional mastectomy at a single center between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2016.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Wu Z-Y et al. JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 14. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4132.

Key clinical point: Outcomes including recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival were similar for breast cancer patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) or skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 

Major finding: Breast cancer patients who underwent IBR with NSM/SSM as surgical treatment showed similar rates of overall survival at 5 years compared to those who underwent conventional mastectomy (92.0% vs. 89.3%).

Study details: The data come from a retrospective, case-control study of 1,266 breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by immediate breast reconstruction or conventional mastectomy at a single center between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2016.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Wu Z-Y et al. JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 14. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4132.