Verrucous Plaques on Sun-Exposed Areas

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 02/19/2025 - 17:02
Display Headline

Verrucous Plaques on Sun-Exposed Areas

THE DIAGNOSIS: Hypertrophic Lupus Erythematosus

The biopsy of the face collected at the initial appointment revealed interface dermatitis with epidermal hyperplasia with no parakeratosis or eosinophils (Figure 1). Microscopic findings were suggestive of hypertrophic lupus erythematosus (HLE) or hypertrophic lichen planus. The rapid plasma reagin and HIV labs collected at the initial appointment were negative, and a review of systems was negative for systemic symptoms. Considering these results and the clinical distribution of the lesions primarily affecting sun-exposed areas of the upper body, a final diagnosis of HLE was made. The patient was counseled on the importance of photoprotection and was started on hydroxychloroquine.

Sattele-1
FIGURE 1. Hypertrophic glassy epithelium with follicular plugging and dense lichenoid interface dermatitis.

Hypertrophic lupus erythematosus, a rare variant of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE), typically manifests as verrucous plaques or nodules commonly found on sun-exposed areas of the body, as was observed in our patient on the face, scalp (Figures 2 and 3), chest, and upper extremities.1 Lesions can have a variable appearance, from hyperkeratotic ulcers to depigmented plaques and keratoacanthomalike lesions.2 On histopathology, HLE falls into the category of lichenoid interface dermatitis and commonly demonstrates hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, follicular plugging, superficial and deep infiltrate, and increased mucin deposition in the dermis.3

Sattele-2
FIGURE 2. Scaly pink patches and plaques with associated scarring alopecia on the scalp.
Sattele-3
FIGURE 3. Hyperkeratotic pink plaques scattered on the scalp.

Although rare, it is critical to remain vigilant for the development of squamous cell carcinoma in patients with chronic untreated CCLE. Hypertrophic lupus erythematosus, specifically, is the most likely variant to give rise to invasive squamous cell carcinoma and can be more aggressive as a result of this malignant transformation.3,4 Ruling out squamous cell carcinoma in the setting of HLE can be achieved by staining for CD123, as HLE commonly is associated with many CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells adjacent to the epithelium, unlike squamous cell carcinoma.3 Fortunately no evidence of invasive squamous cell carcinoma, including cellular atypia or increased mitotic figures, was seen on histology in our patient.

A thorough history and physical examination are essential for screening for HLE, as positive antinuclear antibodies are observed only in half of the patients diagnosed with CCLE.5 Furthermore, antinuclear antibodies sometimes can be negative in patients with HLE who have end-stage organ involvement.

Hypertrophic lupus erythematosus can be challenging to treat. First-line therapies include antimalarials, topical steroids, and sun-protective measures. Intralesional triamcinolone injection also can be used as an adjunctive therapy to expedite the treatment response.6 Evidence supports good response following treatment with acitretin or a combination of isotretinoin and hydroxychloroquine.2 Another therapeutic strategy is implementing immunosuppressants such as methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, and azathioprine for persistent disease. Immunomodulators such as thalidomide historically have been shown to treat severe recalcitrant cases of HLE but typically are reserved for extreme cases due to adverse effects. Biologic agents such as intravenous immunoglobulins and rituximab have been shown to treat CCLE successfully, but routine use is limited due to high cost and lack of strong clinical trials.7

There have been reports of experimental therapies such as monoclonal antibodies (eg, anifrolumab and tocilizumab therapy) providing remission for patients with refractory CCLE, but information on their efficacy—specifically in patients with HLE—is lacking.8 Chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus and its variants require further investigation regarding which treatment options provide the greatest benefit while minimizing adverse effects.

It is important to distinguish HLE from other potential diagnoses. Features of HLE can mimic hypertrophic lichen planus; however, the latter typically appears on the legs while HLE appears more commonly on the upper extremities and face in a photodistributed pattern.9 Since HLE has a lichenoid appearance histologically, it may appear clinically similar to hypertrophic lichen planus. Although not performed in our patient due to cost, direct immunofluorescence can aid in distinguishing HLE from hypertrophic lichen planus. Chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus shows a granular pattern of deposition of IgM (primarily), IgG, IgA, and C3. In contrast, hypertrophic lichen planus exhibits cytoid bodies that stain positive for IgM as well as linear deposition of fibrinogen along the basement membrane.3,10

Blastomycosis also can lead to development of verrucous plaques in sun-exposed areas, but the lesions typically originate as pustules that ulcerate over time. Lesions also can manifest with central scarring and a heaped edge.3 Unlike HLE, pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia with mixed infiltrate and intradermal pustules are seen in blastomycosis.3 Fungal organisms often are seen on pathology and are relatively large and uniform in size and shape, are found within giant cells, and have a thick refractile asymmetrical wall.11 In rupioid psoriasis, skin lesions mostly are widespread and are not limited to sun-exposed areas. Additionally, biopsies from active rupioid lesions typically show psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia with parakeratosis with no interface inflammation—a key differentiator.12 In secondary syphilis, chancres often are missed and are not reported by patients. Clinically, secondary syphilis often manifests as scaly patches and plaques with palmar involvement and positive rapid plasma reagin, which was negative in our patient.13 Histologically, secondary syphilis can exhibit a vacuolar or lichenoid interface dermatitis; however, it typically exhibits slender acanthosis with long rete ridges and neutrophils in the stratum corneum.3 Furthermore, plasma cells are present in about two-thirds of cases in the United States, with obliteration of the lumen of small vessels and perivascular histiocytes and lymphocytes with apparent cytoplasm commonly seen on pathology. Silver staining or immunostaining for Treponema pallidum may reveal the spirochetes that cause this condition.3

References
  1. Ko CJ, Srivastava B, Braverman I, et al. Hypertrophic lupus erythematosus: the diagnostic utility of CD123 staining. J Cutan Pathol. 2011;38:889-892. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0560.2011.01779.x
  2. Narang T, Sharma M, Gulati N, et al. Extensive hypertrophic lupus erythematosus: atypical presentation. Indian J Dermatol. 2012;57:504. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.103085
  3. Elston D, Ferringer T, Ko C, et al. Dermatopathology. 3rd ed. Saunders/ Elsevier; 2018.
  4. Melikoglu MA, Melikoglu M, Demirci E, et al. Discoid lupus erythematosus- associated cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in systemic lupus erythematosus. Eurasian J Med. 2022;54:204-205. doi:10.5152 /eurasianjmed. 2022.21062
  5. Patsinakidis N, Gambichler T, Lahner N, et al. Cutaneous characteristics and association with antinuclear antibodies in 402 patients with different subtypes of lupus erythematosus. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30:2097-2104. doi:10.1111/jdv.13769
  6. Kulkarni S, Kar S, Madke B, et al. A rare presentation of verrucous/ hypertrophic lupus erythematosus: a variant of cutaneous LE. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2014;5:87. doi:10.4103/2229-5178.126048
  7. Winkelmann RR, Kim GK, Del Rosso JQ. Treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: review and assessment of treatment benefits based on Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2013;6:27-38.
  8. Blum FR, Sampath AJ, Foulke GT. Anifrolumab for treatment of refractory cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022;47:1998- 2001. doi:10.1111/ced.15335
  9. Riahi RR, Cohen PR. Hypertrophic lichen planus mimicking verrucous lupus erythematosus. Cureus. 2018;10:E3555. doi:10.7759/cureus.3555
  10. Demirci GT, Altunay IK, Sarýkaya S, et al. Lupus erythematosus and lichen planus overlap syndrome: a case report with a rapid response to topical corticosteroid therapy. Dermatol Reports. 2011 25;3:E48. doi:10.4081/dr.2011.e48
  11. Caldito EG, Antia C, Petronic-Rosic V. Cutaneous blastomycosis. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158:1064. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3151
  12. Ip KHK, Cheng HS, Oliver FG. Rupioid psoriasis. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157:859. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.0451
  13. Trawinski H. Secondary syphilis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021;118:249. doi:10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0107
Author and Disclosure Information

Lauren Sattele and Drs. Alshaikh and Elston are from the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Lauren Sattele is from the College of Graduate Studies, and Drs. Alshaikh and Elston are from the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery. Dr. Strat is from the School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Greenville.

The authors have no relevant financial disclosures to report.

Correspondence: Lauren Sattele, MSCR, 135 Rutledge Ave, 11th Floor, Charleston, SC 29425-5780 (lauren.sattele@uscmed.sc.edu).

Cutis. 2025 February; 115(2):E13-E15. doi:10.12788/cutis.1173

Issue
Cutis - 115(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E13-E15
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Lauren Sattele and Drs. Alshaikh and Elston are from the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Lauren Sattele is from the College of Graduate Studies, and Drs. Alshaikh and Elston are from the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery. Dr. Strat is from the School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Greenville.

The authors have no relevant financial disclosures to report.

Correspondence: Lauren Sattele, MSCR, 135 Rutledge Ave, 11th Floor, Charleston, SC 29425-5780 (lauren.sattele@uscmed.sc.edu).

Cutis. 2025 February; 115(2):E13-E15. doi:10.12788/cutis.1173

Author and Disclosure Information

Lauren Sattele and Drs. Alshaikh and Elston are from the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Lauren Sattele is from the College of Graduate Studies, and Drs. Alshaikh and Elston are from the Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery. Dr. Strat is from the School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Greenville.

The authors have no relevant financial disclosures to report.

Correspondence: Lauren Sattele, MSCR, 135 Rutledge Ave, 11th Floor, Charleston, SC 29425-5780 (lauren.sattele@uscmed.sc.edu).

Cutis. 2025 February; 115(2):E13-E15. doi:10.12788/cutis.1173

THE DIAGNOSIS: Hypertrophic Lupus Erythematosus

The biopsy of the face collected at the initial appointment revealed interface dermatitis with epidermal hyperplasia with no parakeratosis or eosinophils (Figure 1). Microscopic findings were suggestive of hypertrophic lupus erythematosus (HLE) or hypertrophic lichen planus. The rapid plasma reagin and HIV labs collected at the initial appointment were negative, and a review of systems was negative for systemic symptoms. Considering these results and the clinical distribution of the lesions primarily affecting sun-exposed areas of the upper body, a final diagnosis of HLE was made. The patient was counseled on the importance of photoprotection and was started on hydroxychloroquine.

Sattele-1
FIGURE 1. Hypertrophic glassy epithelium with follicular plugging and dense lichenoid interface dermatitis.

Hypertrophic lupus erythematosus, a rare variant of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE), typically manifests as verrucous plaques or nodules commonly found on sun-exposed areas of the body, as was observed in our patient on the face, scalp (Figures 2 and 3), chest, and upper extremities.1 Lesions can have a variable appearance, from hyperkeratotic ulcers to depigmented plaques and keratoacanthomalike lesions.2 On histopathology, HLE falls into the category of lichenoid interface dermatitis and commonly demonstrates hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, follicular plugging, superficial and deep infiltrate, and increased mucin deposition in the dermis.3

Sattele-2
FIGURE 2. Scaly pink patches and plaques with associated scarring alopecia on the scalp.
Sattele-3
FIGURE 3. Hyperkeratotic pink plaques scattered on the scalp.

Although rare, it is critical to remain vigilant for the development of squamous cell carcinoma in patients with chronic untreated CCLE. Hypertrophic lupus erythematosus, specifically, is the most likely variant to give rise to invasive squamous cell carcinoma and can be more aggressive as a result of this malignant transformation.3,4 Ruling out squamous cell carcinoma in the setting of HLE can be achieved by staining for CD123, as HLE commonly is associated with many CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells adjacent to the epithelium, unlike squamous cell carcinoma.3 Fortunately no evidence of invasive squamous cell carcinoma, including cellular atypia or increased mitotic figures, was seen on histology in our patient.

A thorough history and physical examination are essential for screening for HLE, as positive antinuclear antibodies are observed only in half of the patients diagnosed with CCLE.5 Furthermore, antinuclear antibodies sometimes can be negative in patients with HLE who have end-stage organ involvement.

Hypertrophic lupus erythematosus can be challenging to treat. First-line therapies include antimalarials, topical steroids, and sun-protective measures. Intralesional triamcinolone injection also can be used as an adjunctive therapy to expedite the treatment response.6 Evidence supports good response following treatment with acitretin or a combination of isotretinoin and hydroxychloroquine.2 Another therapeutic strategy is implementing immunosuppressants such as methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, and azathioprine for persistent disease. Immunomodulators such as thalidomide historically have been shown to treat severe recalcitrant cases of HLE but typically are reserved for extreme cases due to adverse effects. Biologic agents such as intravenous immunoglobulins and rituximab have been shown to treat CCLE successfully, but routine use is limited due to high cost and lack of strong clinical trials.7

There have been reports of experimental therapies such as monoclonal antibodies (eg, anifrolumab and tocilizumab therapy) providing remission for patients with refractory CCLE, but information on their efficacy—specifically in patients with HLE—is lacking.8 Chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus and its variants require further investigation regarding which treatment options provide the greatest benefit while minimizing adverse effects.

It is important to distinguish HLE from other potential diagnoses. Features of HLE can mimic hypertrophic lichen planus; however, the latter typically appears on the legs while HLE appears more commonly on the upper extremities and face in a photodistributed pattern.9 Since HLE has a lichenoid appearance histologically, it may appear clinically similar to hypertrophic lichen planus. Although not performed in our patient due to cost, direct immunofluorescence can aid in distinguishing HLE from hypertrophic lichen planus. Chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus shows a granular pattern of deposition of IgM (primarily), IgG, IgA, and C3. In contrast, hypertrophic lichen planus exhibits cytoid bodies that stain positive for IgM as well as linear deposition of fibrinogen along the basement membrane.3,10

Blastomycosis also can lead to development of verrucous plaques in sun-exposed areas, but the lesions typically originate as pustules that ulcerate over time. Lesions also can manifest with central scarring and a heaped edge.3 Unlike HLE, pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia with mixed infiltrate and intradermal pustules are seen in blastomycosis.3 Fungal organisms often are seen on pathology and are relatively large and uniform in size and shape, are found within giant cells, and have a thick refractile asymmetrical wall.11 In rupioid psoriasis, skin lesions mostly are widespread and are not limited to sun-exposed areas. Additionally, biopsies from active rupioid lesions typically show psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia with parakeratosis with no interface inflammation—a key differentiator.12 In secondary syphilis, chancres often are missed and are not reported by patients. Clinically, secondary syphilis often manifests as scaly patches and plaques with palmar involvement and positive rapid plasma reagin, which was negative in our patient.13 Histologically, secondary syphilis can exhibit a vacuolar or lichenoid interface dermatitis; however, it typically exhibits slender acanthosis with long rete ridges and neutrophils in the stratum corneum.3 Furthermore, plasma cells are present in about two-thirds of cases in the United States, with obliteration of the lumen of small vessels and perivascular histiocytes and lymphocytes with apparent cytoplasm commonly seen on pathology. Silver staining or immunostaining for Treponema pallidum may reveal the spirochetes that cause this condition.3

THE DIAGNOSIS: Hypertrophic Lupus Erythematosus

The biopsy of the face collected at the initial appointment revealed interface dermatitis with epidermal hyperplasia with no parakeratosis or eosinophils (Figure 1). Microscopic findings were suggestive of hypertrophic lupus erythematosus (HLE) or hypertrophic lichen planus. The rapid plasma reagin and HIV labs collected at the initial appointment were negative, and a review of systems was negative for systemic symptoms. Considering these results and the clinical distribution of the lesions primarily affecting sun-exposed areas of the upper body, a final diagnosis of HLE was made. The patient was counseled on the importance of photoprotection and was started on hydroxychloroquine.

Sattele-1
FIGURE 1. Hypertrophic glassy epithelium with follicular plugging and dense lichenoid interface dermatitis.

Hypertrophic lupus erythematosus, a rare variant of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE), typically manifests as verrucous plaques or nodules commonly found on sun-exposed areas of the body, as was observed in our patient on the face, scalp (Figures 2 and 3), chest, and upper extremities.1 Lesions can have a variable appearance, from hyperkeratotic ulcers to depigmented plaques and keratoacanthomalike lesions.2 On histopathology, HLE falls into the category of lichenoid interface dermatitis and commonly demonstrates hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, follicular plugging, superficial and deep infiltrate, and increased mucin deposition in the dermis.3

Sattele-2
FIGURE 2. Scaly pink patches and plaques with associated scarring alopecia on the scalp.
Sattele-3
FIGURE 3. Hyperkeratotic pink plaques scattered on the scalp.

Although rare, it is critical to remain vigilant for the development of squamous cell carcinoma in patients with chronic untreated CCLE. Hypertrophic lupus erythematosus, specifically, is the most likely variant to give rise to invasive squamous cell carcinoma and can be more aggressive as a result of this malignant transformation.3,4 Ruling out squamous cell carcinoma in the setting of HLE can be achieved by staining for CD123, as HLE commonly is associated with many CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells adjacent to the epithelium, unlike squamous cell carcinoma.3 Fortunately no evidence of invasive squamous cell carcinoma, including cellular atypia or increased mitotic figures, was seen on histology in our patient.

A thorough history and physical examination are essential for screening for HLE, as positive antinuclear antibodies are observed only in half of the patients diagnosed with CCLE.5 Furthermore, antinuclear antibodies sometimes can be negative in patients with HLE who have end-stage organ involvement.

Hypertrophic lupus erythematosus can be challenging to treat. First-line therapies include antimalarials, topical steroids, and sun-protective measures. Intralesional triamcinolone injection also can be used as an adjunctive therapy to expedite the treatment response.6 Evidence supports good response following treatment with acitretin or a combination of isotretinoin and hydroxychloroquine.2 Another therapeutic strategy is implementing immunosuppressants such as methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, and azathioprine for persistent disease. Immunomodulators such as thalidomide historically have been shown to treat severe recalcitrant cases of HLE but typically are reserved for extreme cases due to adverse effects. Biologic agents such as intravenous immunoglobulins and rituximab have been shown to treat CCLE successfully, but routine use is limited due to high cost and lack of strong clinical trials.7

There have been reports of experimental therapies such as monoclonal antibodies (eg, anifrolumab and tocilizumab therapy) providing remission for patients with refractory CCLE, but information on their efficacy—specifically in patients with HLE—is lacking.8 Chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus and its variants require further investigation regarding which treatment options provide the greatest benefit while minimizing adverse effects.

It is important to distinguish HLE from other potential diagnoses. Features of HLE can mimic hypertrophic lichen planus; however, the latter typically appears on the legs while HLE appears more commonly on the upper extremities and face in a photodistributed pattern.9 Since HLE has a lichenoid appearance histologically, it may appear clinically similar to hypertrophic lichen planus. Although not performed in our patient due to cost, direct immunofluorescence can aid in distinguishing HLE from hypertrophic lichen planus. Chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus shows a granular pattern of deposition of IgM (primarily), IgG, IgA, and C3. In contrast, hypertrophic lichen planus exhibits cytoid bodies that stain positive for IgM as well as linear deposition of fibrinogen along the basement membrane.3,10

Blastomycosis also can lead to development of verrucous plaques in sun-exposed areas, but the lesions typically originate as pustules that ulcerate over time. Lesions also can manifest with central scarring and a heaped edge.3 Unlike HLE, pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia with mixed infiltrate and intradermal pustules are seen in blastomycosis.3 Fungal organisms often are seen on pathology and are relatively large and uniform in size and shape, are found within giant cells, and have a thick refractile asymmetrical wall.11 In rupioid psoriasis, skin lesions mostly are widespread and are not limited to sun-exposed areas. Additionally, biopsies from active rupioid lesions typically show psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia with parakeratosis with no interface inflammation—a key differentiator.12 In secondary syphilis, chancres often are missed and are not reported by patients. Clinically, secondary syphilis often manifests as scaly patches and plaques with palmar involvement and positive rapid plasma reagin, which was negative in our patient.13 Histologically, secondary syphilis can exhibit a vacuolar or lichenoid interface dermatitis; however, it typically exhibits slender acanthosis with long rete ridges and neutrophils in the stratum corneum.3 Furthermore, plasma cells are present in about two-thirds of cases in the United States, with obliteration of the lumen of small vessels and perivascular histiocytes and lymphocytes with apparent cytoplasm commonly seen on pathology. Silver staining or immunostaining for Treponema pallidum may reveal the spirochetes that cause this condition.3

References
  1. Ko CJ, Srivastava B, Braverman I, et al. Hypertrophic lupus erythematosus: the diagnostic utility of CD123 staining. J Cutan Pathol. 2011;38:889-892. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0560.2011.01779.x
  2. Narang T, Sharma M, Gulati N, et al. Extensive hypertrophic lupus erythematosus: atypical presentation. Indian J Dermatol. 2012;57:504. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.103085
  3. Elston D, Ferringer T, Ko C, et al. Dermatopathology. 3rd ed. Saunders/ Elsevier; 2018.
  4. Melikoglu MA, Melikoglu M, Demirci E, et al. Discoid lupus erythematosus- associated cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in systemic lupus erythematosus. Eurasian J Med. 2022;54:204-205. doi:10.5152 /eurasianjmed. 2022.21062
  5. Patsinakidis N, Gambichler T, Lahner N, et al. Cutaneous characteristics and association with antinuclear antibodies in 402 patients with different subtypes of lupus erythematosus. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30:2097-2104. doi:10.1111/jdv.13769
  6. Kulkarni S, Kar S, Madke B, et al. A rare presentation of verrucous/ hypertrophic lupus erythematosus: a variant of cutaneous LE. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2014;5:87. doi:10.4103/2229-5178.126048
  7. Winkelmann RR, Kim GK, Del Rosso JQ. Treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: review and assessment of treatment benefits based on Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2013;6:27-38.
  8. Blum FR, Sampath AJ, Foulke GT. Anifrolumab for treatment of refractory cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022;47:1998- 2001. doi:10.1111/ced.15335
  9. Riahi RR, Cohen PR. Hypertrophic lichen planus mimicking verrucous lupus erythematosus. Cureus. 2018;10:E3555. doi:10.7759/cureus.3555
  10. Demirci GT, Altunay IK, Sarýkaya S, et al. Lupus erythematosus and lichen planus overlap syndrome: a case report with a rapid response to topical corticosteroid therapy. Dermatol Reports. 2011 25;3:E48. doi:10.4081/dr.2011.e48
  11. Caldito EG, Antia C, Petronic-Rosic V. Cutaneous blastomycosis. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158:1064. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3151
  12. Ip KHK, Cheng HS, Oliver FG. Rupioid psoriasis. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157:859. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.0451
  13. Trawinski H. Secondary syphilis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021;118:249. doi:10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0107
References
  1. Ko CJ, Srivastava B, Braverman I, et al. Hypertrophic lupus erythematosus: the diagnostic utility of CD123 staining. J Cutan Pathol. 2011;38:889-892. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0560.2011.01779.x
  2. Narang T, Sharma M, Gulati N, et al. Extensive hypertrophic lupus erythematosus: atypical presentation. Indian J Dermatol. 2012;57:504. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.103085
  3. Elston D, Ferringer T, Ko C, et al. Dermatopathology. 3rd ed. Saunders/ Elsevier; 2018.
  4. Melikoglu MA, Melikoglu M, Demirci E, et al. Discoid lupus erythematosus- associated cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in systemic lupus erythematosus. Eurasian J Med. 2022;54:204-205. doi:10.5152 /eurasianjmed. 2022.21062
  5. Patsinakidis N, Gambichler T, Lahner N, et al. Cutaneous characteristics and association with antinuclear antibodies in 402 patients with different subtypes of lupus erythematosus. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30:2097-2104. doi:10.1111/jdv.13769
  6. Kulkarni S, Kar S, Madke B, et al. A rare presentation of verrucous/ hypertrophic lupus erythematosus: a variant of cutaneous LE. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2014;5:87. doi:10.4103/2229-5178.126048
  7. Winkelmann RR, Kim GK, Del Rosso JQ. Treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: review and assessment of treatment benefits based on Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2013;6:27-38.
  8. Blum FR, Sampath AJ, Foulke GT. Anifrolumab for treatment of refractory cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022;47:1998- 2001. doi:10.1111/ced.15335
  9. Riahi RR, Cohen PR. Hypertrophic lichen planus mimicking verrucous lupus erythematosus. Cureus. 2018;10:E3555. doi:10.7759/cureus.3555
  10. Demirci GT, Altunay IK, Sarýkaya S, et al. Lupus erythematosus and lichen planus overlap syndrome: a case report with a rapid response to topical corticosteroid therapy. Dermatol Reports. 2011 25;3:E48. doi:10.4081/dr.2011.e48
  11. Caldito EG, Antia C, Petronic-Rosic V. Cutaneous blastomycosis. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158:1064. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3151
  12. Ip KHK, Cheng HS, Oliver FG. Rupioid psoriasis. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157:859. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.0451
  13. Trawinski H. Secondary syphilis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021;118:249. doi:10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0107
Issue
Cutis - 115(1)
Issue
Cutis - 115(1)
Page Number
E13-E15
Page Number
E13-E15
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline

Verrucous Plaques on Sun-Exposed Areas

Display Headline

Verrucous Plaques on Sun-Exposed Areas

Sections
Questionnaire Body

A 54-year-old man with no notable medical history presented to an outpatient dermatology clinic with multiple skin lesions on sun-exposed areas including the face, chest, scalp, and bilateral upper extremities. The patient reported that he had not seen a doctor for 26 years. He noted that the lesions had been present for many years but was unsure of the exact timeframe. Physical examination revealed verrucous plaques with a violaceous rim and central hypopigmentation on the chest, scalp, face, and arms. Scarring alopecia also was noted on the scalp with no associated pain or pruritus. Antinuclear antibody and extractable nuclear antigen tests were negative, and urine analysis was normal. A shave biopsy of the chest was performed for histopathologic evaluation. Rapid plasma reagin tests and HIV antibody tests also were performed.

Sattele-Quiz
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Tue, 01/28/2025 - 10:49
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 01/28/2025 - 10:49
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 01/28/2025 - 10:49
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
survey writer start date
Tue, 01/28/2025 - 10:49